CCCTMA Cumberland County Bicycle Report

8/14/2019 CCCTMA Cumberland County Bicycle Report

1/48

Bicycle Facilities inventoryand analysis

CUMBERLAND COUNTY

Cross County Connection Transportation Management Association

December 2007

2002 D Lincoln Drive West

Marlton, NJ 08053

Phone: (856) 596-8228

www.driveless.com


2/48

BICYCLE FACILITIES INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS

CUMBERLAND COUNTY

December 2007

2002D Lincoln Drive WestMarlton, NJ 08053

(856) 596-8228www.driveless.com

Cross County Connection TMA was incorporated in 1989through the efforts of a group of southern New Jerseybusiness leaders, local government officials, andrepresentatives from the New Jersey Department ofTransportation (NJDOT) and New Jersey Transit Corporation(NJ TRANSIT) to address mobility issues in the region andreduce the number of vehicles on state and local roadways.Today, Cross County Connection is a non-profit organization,which partners with NJDOT, NJ TRANSIT, Federal HighwayAdministration and its members to provide solutions to

complex transportation problems for counties, municipalities,employers and commuters in our seven-county region.

This Cross County Connection Transportation ManagementAssociation publication is funded by the New Jersey Department ofTransportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation FederalHighway Administration. The Federal Government and the State ofNew Jersey assume no liability for the contents.


3/48

Bicycle Facilities Inventory and Analysis: Cumberland County____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Cross County Connection December 2007i

Table of Contents

Page1. INTRODUCTION 1

Perspective 1The Cumberland County Work 3Methodology 3

2. INVENTORY 4

Inventory Findings 4Linkages to Public Transit 5Linkages with Adjacent Counties 5Summary 9

3. BICYCLE FACILITY RANKING ANALYSIS 10

Ranking Criteria 10Findings 12Summary 15

4.PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIESRECOMMENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION

16

Bicycle Corridors: Northern and Southern 16Summary 22

5 CONCLUSION 23Bicycle Task Force 23

Planning Tools 23Funding Opportunities 24Summary 24

List of Tables

PageTable 1 Bicycle Facilities by Segments & Miles:

Cumberland County5

Table 2 Criteria 1: Proximity to CommuterRoadways

10

Table 3 Criteria 2: Number of Bus Routes within 2Miles

11

Table 4 Criteria 3: Proximity to Business Parks 12Table 5 Criteria 4: Number of Schools within 2Miles

12

Table 6 Highest Ranking Facilities Averaged byMunicipality

13

Table 7 Highest Ranking Facilities Overall byMunicipality

13

Table 8 Workplace County Flows: CumberlandCounty Residents, 2000

14

Table 9 Proposed Bicycle Facilities Recommendedfor Construction

20


4/48

Bicycle Facilities Inventory and Analysis: Cumberland County___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Cross County Connection December 2007ii

List of Figures

PageFigure 1 Bicycle Facilities Inventory: Cumberland

County6

Figure 2 Bicycle Facilities and Bus Routes:Cumberland County

7

Figure 3 Bicycle Facilities Inventory: Atlantic,Cumberland, Salem and Gloucester

Counties

8

Figure 4 Cumberland County Proposed BicycleFacilities Recommended for ConstructionNorthern & Southern Corridors

18

Figure 5 Proposed Facility Shiloh Pike 30Figure 6 Proposed Facility Broad Street 30Figure 7 Proposed Facility Commerce Street 31Figure 8 Proposed Facility Pearl Street 31Figure 9 Proposed Facility 2nd Street (Route 47) 32

Figure 10 Proposed Facility Bridgeton SunsetSprint Triathlon

32

Figure 11 Proposed Facility Route 49 (Main Street) 33Figure 12 Proposed Facility Laurel Lake 33Figure 13 Proposed Facility Circuit Route 2 34Figure 14 Proposed Facility Proposed Mayor

Aitken Drive34

Figure 15 Proposed Facility Circuit Route 4 35

Figure 16 Proposed Facility Rails to Trails Route 35Figure 17 Proposed Facility Upper Deerfield TwpProposed Off-Road

36

Figure 18 Proposed Facility Route 77 36Figure 19 Proposed Facility Circuit Route 3 37Figure 20 Proposed Facility Carmel Road 37Figure 21 Proposed Facility School House Lane 38Figure 22 Proposed Facility Cooper Street 38

Figure 23 Proposed Facility Sharp Street 39

Figure 24 Proposed Facility Laurel Lake(Municipal) 39Figure 25 Proposed Facility -Circuit Route 5 40Figure 26 Proposed Facility -Circuit Route (Rt. 719) 40Figure 27 Proposed Facility -Bridgeton Millville Pike 41

List of Appendices

PageAppendix A Bicycle Facilities Inventory: CumberlandCounty Table of Attributes

25

Appendix B Proposed Bicycle Facilities 30Appendix C Funding and Technical Assistance

Sources for Bicycle Facilities42


5/48


6/48


7/48


8/48


9/48


10/48

47

Vineland City

Maurice River Twp

Millville City

Downe Twp

Fairfield Twp

Lawrence Twp

Hopewell Twp

Commercial Twp

Upper Deerfield Twp

Greenwich Twp

Deerfield TwpStow Creek Twp

Bridgeton City

Shiloh Borough

55

56

49

47

77

56

676

616

553

553

616

553

553

Figure 1: Bicycle Facilities Inventory

Cumberland County

School

Bicycle Facilities

Existing, Off-Road

Existing, On-Road

Proposed, Off-Road

Proposed, On-Road

Business ParkPark

0 2 41 Miles

2002D Lincoln Drive W

Marlton, NJ 08053

www.driveless.com

December 2007

6


11/48

Atlantic County

Cape May County

Salem County

49

47

47

Vineland City

Maurice River Twp

Millville City

Downe Twp

Fairfield Twp

Lawrence Twp

Hopewell Twp

Commercial Twp

Upper Deerfield Twp

Greenwich Twp

Deerfield TwpStow Creek Twp

Bridgeton City

Shiloh Borough

55

56

47

77

56

676

616

553

553

616

553

553

313

408

553

410

Figure 2: Bicycle Facilities

and Bus Routes

Cumberland County

School

Bicycle Facilities

Existing, Off-Road

Existing, On-Road

Proposed, Off-Road

Proposed, On-Road

Business Park

Cumberland County Shuttle

NJ TRANSIT Bus

Park

0 2.5 51.25 Miles

7

2002D Lincoln Drive W

Marlton, NJ 08053

www.driveless.com

December 2007

400


12/48


13/48


Cross County Connection December 20079

Gloucester County Linkages

In Cumberland County only Vineland City shares a border withGloucester County. There are no existing or proposed linksbetween Cumberland County and Gloucester County.

However, a proposed route in Pittsgrove Township, SalemCounty, could link with a proposed route in Newfield Boroughand Franklin Township, Gloucester County, if the missingsegment in Vineland was proposed. By creating this link inVineland, bicyclists would have access to Gloucester andSalem counties.

Atlantic County Linkages

At the present time, Atlantic County and Cumberland Countydo not have existing or proposed bicycle facilities that link withone another. Atlantic County has proposed bicycle facilities

along Routes 54, 40 and 50. These routes provide north-south and east-west access into Atlantic County. Additionally,Route 54 merges into Route 206 in Burlington County andRoute 50 provides access into Cape May County. Thefeasibility of connecting bicycle routes from these routes intoCumberland County should be considered.

SUMMARY

As Figure 1 demonstrates, Cumberland County has severalproposed bicycle facilities in the western section of the county.Additionally, several facilities are clustered in the southeasternsection of the County. Additional routes are proposed alongRoutes 553 and 49, however the remainder of the County,including the Vineland area, is not connected to bicyclefacilities.

Many of the proposed facilities appear on the States BicyclePlan but are not part of any municipal plan. Municipal supportof these proposed facilities must be obtained if they are to beconstructed.

Given the limited financial resources that may be available toconstruct this bicycle facility network, a prioritization systemshould be put into place to ensure that those facilities with themost benefit will be built first. Phase II of Cross CountyConnections bicycle facility project does this; and is discussedin chapters 3 and 4.


14/48



3. BICYCLE FACILITY RANKING ANALYSIS

To identify those bicycle facilities that should be built in thenear future, Cross County Connection developed a set ofranking criteria and applied each criterion to the bicycle facilityinventory. The purpose of ranking criteria is to determinewhich facilities are most suitable for commuter usage. Thecriteria are as follows:

1. Proximity to commuter roadways2. Number of New Jersey TRANSIT bus routes within two

miles3. Proximity to business parks4. Number of schools within two miles

RANKING CRITERIA

For each criterion, a set of values or points was established.Criteria one and four are assigned from zero to four pointswhile criteria two and three have been weighted and areassigned from two to six points, equaling a possible 20 pointsfor each bicycle facility. A score of zero shows that aparticular criterion is least conducive to bicycle usage. Forexample, a zero in Criterion One would indicate that a facilityis more than two miles from the commuter roadways. A score

of four or six in a particular criterion shows that the facility ismost conducive to bicycle usage. For example, in CriterionTwo a score of six would indicate that a facility is within twomiles of more than five NJ TRANSIT bus routes.

Criterion One: Proximity to Commuter Roadways

Routes 77, 56, 55, 49, 47, 616, 621, 623, 638, 670, 676 and553 were chosen as the attractors in this criterion. They serveas the major transportation arteries through CumberlandCounty, thus allowing access to most areas throughout thestudy area. Therefore, the closer a bicycle facility is to one ofthese roads, the more attractive the facility will be as a

commuter corridor for bicyclists.

Cross County Connection identified the bicycle facilities withina two mile buffer of the identified commuter roadways. Asshown in Table 2, those facilities that fell within the two milebuffer were then scored based on their distance from theroadway.

Table 2Criteria 1: Proximity to Commuter Roadways

ScoreDistance of Bicycle Facility from CommuterRoadway

0 >2 miles

1 1.5 2.0 miles2 1.0 1.5 miles

3 0.5 1.0 miles4 0 0.5 miles


15/48



Criterion Two: Proximity to New Jersey TRANSIT BusRoutes

The number of NJ TRANSIT routes within a two mile buffer ofthe bicycle facility was selected as a criterion because abicyclist linking with a bus route has access to a much largergeographic area for employment. All NJ TRANSIT buses havebicycle racks. In addition, the number of routes is important

because a bicyclist can ride along a bicycle facility to anintersect point with a NJ TRANSIT bus, put the bicycle on thebike rack and ride to their stop. Upon reaching their stop, thebicyclist can then take the bicycle off of the bus and ride totheir destination. Therefore, the number of bus routes wouldhelp to determine the usage of a particular bicycle facility as acommuter route. Table 3 shows how the bicycle facilities werescored based on the distance to bus routes.

County shuttle services also play an important role indetermining a commuter bicycle route. There are four countyshuttles operating throughout Cumberland County that link toNJ TRANSIT bus routes in Vineland and Bridgeton. Theseshuttles can help a bicyclist reach an employment site outsidethe two mile buffer zone.

Table 3Criteria 2: Number of Bus Routes Within Two Miles

Score Number of Bus Routes Within Two Miles

0 02 1

3 24 3

5 4

6 5 or more

Criterion Three: Proximity to Business Parks

Bicycle facilities benefit from being within two miles of abusiness park because of increased proximity to employmentopportunities. If a business park is along or in proximity to a

bicycle facility, then the usage of the bicycle facility as acommuter route would most likely increase. When combinedwith other modes of transport, such as buses that have bicycleracks, commuters could arrive at their employment sites bycombining different modes of transportation and incorporatethe bicycle facility into the overall transportation network.

The business parks in Cumberland County were identifiedusing county maps, the New Jersey Department of Labor and

Workforce Development employers database, theCumberland County Department of Planning andDevelopment, the City of Vineland Economic DevelopmentDepartment, the City of Bridgeton Economic and DevelopmentDepartment, the City of Millville Industrial and Economic


16/48



Department and local knowledge and experience. The bicyclefacilities were scored as shown in Table 4.

Table 4Criteria 3: Proximity to Business Parks

Score Proximity to Business Parks0 >2 miles

2 1.5 2 miles3 1.0 1.5 miles4 0.5 1.0 miles5 0.25- 0.5 miles6 0 to 0.25 miles

Criterion Four: Number of Schools within Two Miles

The number of schools within a two mile buffer was selectedas a criterion to encourage students to use bicycles tocommute to school. When considered along with governmentspending on programs such as the Safe Routes to SchoolsInitiative, schools are becoming a significant attractor foralternative modes of commuting. Including this criterion allowsCross County Connection to account for a growing number ofcommuters. At the present time, approximately 25% of

morning traffic is school related. The bicycle facilities werescored as shown in Table 6.

Table 5Criteria 4: Number of Schools Within Two Miles

Score Number of Schools Within Two Miles0 01 1 to 32 4 to 73 8 to104 11+

FINDINGS

Each facility was scored and ranked based on the abovecriteria. All municipalities in Cumberland County have at leastone existing or proposed bicycle facility. The facilities rangedin score from a low of 0 to a high of 17. The highest possiblescore is 20, which shows that the bicycle facility is most

conducive to commuting. The lowest possible score is a 0which shows that the bicycle facility is least conducive tocommuting. The average score amongst the 73 facilities is10.0. The facilities that scored at or above the average scoreare located in eight municipalities, as shown on Table 6.Table 6 shows the average score of all bicycle facilities in eachof the eight municipalities.

As Table 6 shows, the range of the 8 highest scores variesfrom a low of 10.0 to a high of 17.0.


17/48



Table 6Highest Ranking Facilities Averaged by Municipality

Rank Municipality Score

1 Vineland City 17.02 Bridgeton City 15.0

3 Millville City 14.04 Hopewell Township 13.0

5 Upper Deerfield Township 13.0

6 Shiloh Borough 11.07 Fairfield Township 10.0

8 GreenwichTownship 10.0

This analysis also examined the overall scores of each bicyclefacility in each municipality. The overall score is comprised ofthe individual scores of all of the existing and proposed

facilities within the municipality thus indicating the volume offacilities in the municipality; the higher the overall score, thegreater the number of facilities in the municipality. As Table 7shows, Bridgeton City surpasses all other municipalities withan overall score of 226 while the next thirteen municipalitiesrange from a score of 158 to 1. Forty-two percent of thereported bicycle facilities in Cumberland County are proposedwhile fifty-eight percent are existing facilities.

Table 7Highest Ranking Facilities Overall by Municipality

Rank Municipality Score1 Bridgeton City 2262 Millville City 1583 Maurice River Township 1194 Hopewell Township 1145 Upper Deerfield Township 66

6 Fairfield Township 607 Downe Township 438 Greenwich Township 409 Commercial Township 23

10 Shiloh Borough 2211 Vineland City 1712 Lawrence Township 1513 Deerfield Township 5

14 Stow Creek Township 1

County Resident Commuting Patterns

The U.S. Census of 2000 documented the commuting patternsof employees from their county of residence to their county ofemployment. Approximately, 22% of Cumberland Countys

employed residents travel outside the County for employment.Given this percentage and this studys emphasis on bicyclefacilities for commuting purposes, Cross CountyConnection thought it important to analyze existing andproposed bicycle facilities linking to employment destinationsnot only within the County, but outside the County, as well.


18/48


19/48



SUMMARY

Thirty-nine existing and proposed bicycle facilities, out of atotal of 73 facilities, scored above the average of 10.0. Asstated above, these bicycle facilities are located in proximity toexisting commuter attractors. Cumberland County has a largenumber of existing facilities that make the county highlysuitable for building proposed facilities to complement the

existing network. The proposed facilities will fill the gapswithin the established network by improving the mobility andaccessibility of users throughout Cumberland County.

The Cumberland County bicycle network will play an importantrole in connecting the neighboring counties of Gloucester andSalem. The proposed facilities travel along the road network,and connect with NJ TRANSIT bus routes that takecommuters into Gloucester and Salem Counties. These

counties support a significant number of employmentopportunities for Cumberland County residents. Given thepublic transit connections into these counties, it is reasonableto assume that a strong bicycle network in Cumberland Countywill be attractive to many residents seeking employmentoutside of Cumberland County.

Connections between Atlantic and Cumberland Counties are

not present for Cumberland County residents traveling intoAtlantic County for employment. There are no existing orproposed facilities linking the two counties. Currently, there isonly one NJ TRANSIT bus route that connects Cumberlandand Atlantic Counties. Bicycle facilities should be consideredto link the counties and to provide an alternate mode of

transportation for Cumberland County residents employed inAtlantic County.

Cross County Connection believes that funding theconstruction of the identified proposed facilities is a next stepto improving the bicycle network in Cumberland County forcommuting purposes. Therefore the need to assist themunicipalities to obtain funding and complete their proposed

facilities is the priority. Cross County Connection believes thatthis is the next step in making Cumberland County attractiveas an alternative commuting location for visitors and residents.


20/48


21/48



Township, Bridgeton City, Millville City and Vineland City. Thesouthern corridor includes Greenwich Township, FairfieldTownship, Lawrence Township, Downe Township,Commercial Township and Maurice River Township.

As Table 9 shows, there are five proposed routesrecommended for construction in the southern corridor. Fourof the five proposed routes traverse both corridors. The

northern corridor routes provide access to large employmentand population areas. They also provide access to bus routesserving Salem, Gloucester and Atlantic counties.

Figure 4: Cumberland County


22/48

Atlantic County

Cape May County

Salem County

47

49

55

56

49

47

77

56

676

626

616

623

553

553

616

553

553

553

313

408

553

410

Vineland City

Maurice River Township

Millville City

Downe Township

Fairfield Township

Lawrence Township

Hopewell Township

Commercial Township

Upper Deerfield Township

Greenwich Township

Deerfield Township

Stow Creek Township

Bridgeton City

Shiloh Borough

Downe Township

Figure 4: Cumberland County

Proposed Bicycle Facilities

Recommended for Construction

Northern & Southern Corridors

www.driveless.com2002D Lincoln Dr W, Marlton, NJ 08053Tel. (856)-596-8228December, 2007

School

Bicycle Facilities

Proposed, Off-Road

Proposed, On-Road

Business Park

Cumberland County Shuttle

NJ TRANSIT Bus

Park

Northern Corridor

Southern Corridor

0 2.5 51.25 Miles

18

400


23/48


24/48



Table 9

Proposed Bicycle Facilities Recommended for ConstructionFigure # (Refer toAppendix B)

FacilityName/Location

Municipality Score Corridor Type

5 Shiloh Pike Bridgeton City, Hopewell, Shiloh 17 Northern On Road6 Broad Street Bridgeton City 16 Northern On Road

7 Commerce Street Fairfield, Bridgeton City 16Northern &

SouthernOn Road

8 Pearl Street Bridgeton City 16 Northern On Road

92nd Street (Route47)

Millville City, Maurice River 16Northern &Southern

On Road

10The BridgetonSunset SprintTriathlon

Greenwich, Hopewell, Bridgeton City 16Northern &Southern

On Road

11Route 49 (MainStreet)

Millville City, Maurice River 15Northern &Southern

On Road

12 Laurel Lake Millville City 15 Northern Off Road13 Circuit Route 2 Hopewell 15 Northern On Road

14Proposed MayorAitken Drive

Bridgeton City 15Northern

On Road

15 Circuit Route 4 Hopewell, Bridgeton City 15 Northern On Road16 Rails to Trail Route Hopewell, Bridgeton City 14 Northern Off Road

17Upper DeerfieldTownship

Proposed Off-Road

Upper Deerfield 14 Northern Off Road

18 Route 77 Upper Deerfield 14 Northern On Road19 Circuit Route 3 Hopewell, Bridgeton City 14 Northern On Road20 Carmel Road Millville City 14 Northern On Road21 School House Lane Millville City 14 Northern On Road


25/48



22 Cooper Street Millville City 14 Northern On Road23 Sharp Street Millville City 14 Northern On Road

24Laurel Lake(Municipal Funded)

Millville City 14Northern

Off Road

25 Circuit Route 5 Upper Deerfield 12 Northern On Road

26Circuit Route(Route 719)

Hopewell, Upper Deerfield 11Northern

On Road

27 Bridgeton MillvillePike Fairfield 10 Southern On Road


26/48



SUMMARY

Eight municipalities have proposed bicycle facilities thatscored at or above average in the bicycle ranking system. It ishighly recommended that the City of Vineland, which has notbeen included within the proposed network, be linked to therest of the bicycle system in the future.

The City of Vineland has great potential for bicycles facilities.There are three NJ TRANSIT routes that serve the city. Abicycle facility could be proposed along NJ Transit Route 553,which will connect Cumberland and Atlantic Counties.Proposed facilities in the City of Vineland could provideconnections to bicycle facilities in Millville.

Cumberland County possesses a high number of existingbicycle facilities, business parks and other attractors that,

together with increases in projected population andemployment, make the Countys bicycle network suitable forimproving both transportation mobility and effectiveness.Cross County Connection recommends funding the proposedfacilities because they will provide modes of alternativetransportation for commuters in Cumberland County. Whenlinked to bicycle facilities and bus routes serving theneighboring counties, these facilities can provide a regionalbicycle transportation network established through acoordinated planning effort between county and municipalgovernments.


27/48


28/48

Bicycle Facilities Inventory and Analysis: Cumberland County


29/48



Appendix ABicycle Facilities Inventory: Cumberland CountyTable of Attributes

Municipality Path Name Status TypeLength(miles)

NJ TransitBus Routes

Within 2 MilesSource

Milleville City, Maurice River

Twp 2nd Street (Route 47) Proposed On-Road 13.4 313, 408, 553 NJ State Plan

Bridgeton City Babe Ruth Drive Existing On-Road 0.1 410, 553 Bridgeton City

Downe Twp Beaver Dam Rd Existing On-Road 1.3 NJ State Plan

Fairfield Twp Bridgeton Fairton Existing On-Road 0.4 Fairfield Twp

Fairfield Twp Bridgeton Millville Rd Proposed On-Road 2.5 553 NJ State Plan

Bridgeton City Broad Street Proposed On-Road 1.4 410, 553 NJ State Plan

Bridgeton City Burlington Rd Existing On-Road 3.4 410, 553 NJ State Plan

Bridgeton City Burt Street Existing On-Road 0.3 410, 553 Bridgeton City

Millville City Carmel Rd Proposed On-Road 0.8 313, 408, 553 City of Millville

Stow Creek Twp Causeway Rd Existing On-Road 2.0 NJ State Plan

Fairfield Twp,Lawrence Twp Cedarville Fairton Rd Existing On-Road 1.9 NJ State Plan

Downe Twp, Lawrence Twp Cedarville Newport Rd Existing On-Road 1.5 NJ State Plan

Stow Creek Twp Chestnut Rd Existing On-Road 1.8 NJ State Plan



30/48



Municipality Path Name Status TypeLength

(miles)



Shiloh Boro, Hopewell Twp Circuit Route (Rt 635) Proposed On-Road 5.3 Hopewell TwpHopewell Twp, UpperdeerfieldTwp Circuit Route (Rt 719) Proposed On-Road 6.4 410 Hopewell Twp

Greenwich, Hopewell Twp Circuit Route 1 Proposed On-Road 4.8 Hopewell Twp

Hopewell Twp Circuit Route 2 Proposed On-Road 6.1 410, 553 Hopewell Twp

Hopewell, Bridgeton City Circuit Route 3 Proposed On-Road 0.8 410, 553 Hopewell Twp

Hopewell Twp Circuit Route 4 Proposed On-Road 3.5 410, 553 Hopewell Twp

Upperdeerfield Circuit Route 5 Proposed On-Road 7.3 410, 553 Hopewell Twp

Fairfield Twp, Bridgeton City Commerce Street Proposed On-Road 2.0 410, 553 NJ State Plan

Millville City Cooper St Proposed On-Road 0.3 313, 408, 553 City of Millville

Vineland Township Delsea Drive Existing On-Road 1.4 313, 408, 553 Vineland City

Maurice River Earth Dike Existing On-Road 0.9 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Fairfield Twp Fairton Gouldtown Existing On-Road 1.4 553 Fairfield Twp

Maurice River Glade Rd Existing On-Road 3.9 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Greenwich Twp

Greenwich-Shiloh Rd

C 62 Existing On-Road 8.4 410, 553 NJ State Plan

Downe Twp Haleyville Rd Existing On-Road 2.1 NJ State Plan

Downe Township Hansey's Creek Road Proposed On-Road 2.5 Downe Township

Commercial High Street Existing On-Road 0.7 NJ State Plan



31/48




(miles)



Maurice River High Street Existing On-Road 1.0 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Commercial Twp Highland Street Existing On-Road 4.1 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Maurice River Hunters Mill Rd Proposed On-Road 0.6 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Millville City Laurel Lake Proposed Off-Road 1.1 313, 408, 553 Millville City

Millville CityLaurel Lake (MunicipalFunded) Proposed Off-Road 0.3 313, 408, 553 Millville City

Maurice River Main Street Existing On-Road 2.4 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Downe TwpMain Street DowneTwp Existing On-Road 1.4 NJ State Plan

Fairfield Twp Main Street Fairfield Existing On-Road 0.4 410, 553 Fairfield Twp

Lawrence

Main Street Lawrence

Twp Existing On-Road 2.9 NJ State Plan

Maurice River TwpMain Street MauriceRiver Existing On-Road 2.3 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Maurice River Matts Landing Rd Existing On-Road 1.2 NJ State Plan

Maurice River Matts Landing Rd 1 Proposed On-Road 1.6 NJ State Plan

Maurice River TwpMauricetownCrossway Rd Existing On-Road 1.7 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Bridgeton City Mayor Aitken Drive Existing On-Road 0.5 410, 553 Bridgeton City

Maurice River Menhaden Rd Existing On-Road 0.6 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Downe Twp Mill Rd Existing On-Road 0.6 NJ State Plan

Commercial Twp Miller Ave Existing On-Road 1.1 NJ State Plan



32/48

y y y y___________________________________________________________________________________________________



(miles)



Deerfield Township Morton Avenue Existing On-Road 1.9 Deerfield Township

Maurice River Newell Rd Existing On-Road 1.4 313, 408 NJ State PlanBridgeton City, UpperDeerfield Twp Park Drive Existing On-Road 1.4 410, 553 Bridgeton City

Bridgeton City Pearl Street Proposed On-Road 2.3 410, 553 NJ State Plan

Maurice River Point Rd Existing On-Road 3.1 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Maurice River Port Norris Proposed Off-Road 5.3 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Commercial, Downe Twp

Port Norris DividingCreek Rd (MainStreet) Existing On-Road 5.6 NJ State Plan

Bridgeton CityProposed MayorAitken Dr Proposed On-Road 0.4 410, 553 Bridgeton City

Maurice River Railroad Ave Proposed On-Road 1.5 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Hopewell Rails to Trail Route Proposed Off-Road 4.1 410, 553 Hopewell Township

Bridgeton City Rosenhayn Ave Existing On-Road 1.0 410, 553 NJ State PlanMillville City, Maurice RiverTwp, Route 49 (Main Street) Proposed On-Road 16.3 313, 408, 553 NJ State Plan

Upperdeerfield Route 77 Proposed On-Road 7.7 410, 553 NJ State Plan

Bridgeton City Scholastic Drive Existing On-Road 0.5 410, 553 Bridgeton City

Millville City School House Ln Proposed On-Road 0.1 313, 408, 553 City of Millville

Millville City Sharp St Proposed On-Road 0.1 313, 408, 553 Millville City



33/48

y y y y___________________________________________________________________________________________________



(miles)



Bridgeton City, Hopewell Twp,Shiloh Boro Shiloh Pike Proposed On-Road 3.6 410, 553 NJ State PlanGreenwich, Hopewell,Bridgeton City

The Bridgeton SunsetSprint Triathlon Proposed On-Road 6.8 410, 553 Hopewell Twp

Maurice River Thompson Beach Rd Proposed On-Road 1.9 313, 408 NJ State Plan

Downe Twp Turkey Point Rd Existing On-Road 2.7313, 408, 410,553 Downe Twp

Millville City Union Lake Existing Off-Road 1.2 313, 408, 553 Millville City

Upper DeerfieldUpper Deerfield TwpProposed Off-Road Proposed Off-Road 5.0 410, 553 NJ State Plan

Millville City Waltman Park Existing Off-Road 0.3 313, 408, 553 Millville City

Millville City Ware Ave Existing On-Road 0.4 313, 408, 553 Millville City

Bridgeton City West Ave Existing On-Road 2.5 410, 553 Bridgeton City

Greenwich Twp Ye Greate Street Existing On-Road 1.7 NJ State Plan

Total Facilities: 73 Paths191.2 Miles Existing Facilities: 75.4 Miles

ProposedFacilities: 115.8 Miles

On-Road: 73.9 Miles On-Road: 100 Miles

Off-Road: 1.5 Miles Off-Road: 15.8 Miles


34/48


35/48

A di B P d Bi l F iliti



36/48

Appendix B: Proposed Bicycle Facilities

32

Number of Bus Routes Within 2 Miles

Miles from Business Park

Number of Schools within 2 Miles

Overall Score

2nd Street (Rout 47)

Miles to Commuter Roadway

16

3

10


37/48


33




Overall Score

Route 49 (Main Street)Miles to Commuter Roadway

15

3

10


38/48


34




Overall Score

Mayor Aitken DrMiles to Commuter Roadway

15

2

10


39/48


35 December 2007




Overall Score

Circuit Route 4Miles to Commuter Roadway

15

2

9


40/48

pp p y

36

DeerfieldPlaza

Shopping CtrCarlis Corner

LaurelPlaza

Pearl

St

North Bridgeton

Upper Deerfield Twp

77

56

Hopewell Twp

Landis

Ave

Deerfie

ldRd

MortonA

ve

PolkLn

North

ville

Rd

WeberRd

BigOakRd

RichardsRd Parvins

MillRd

FinleyRd

Fox

Old

Burlingto

n

Silver Lake

WoodruffRd

OldDeerfieldPike

BurlingtonRd

Rosenhayn

GartonRd

Cente

rton

Rd

HustedStatio

n

AlmondRd

Business Park

NJ TRANSIT Bus

Proposed Off Road

15

1

Figure 17: Upper Deerfield Proposed Off Road Facility

Upper Deerfield Twp

410

400

553

410

,

School

611

553

606

659

December 2007




Overall Score

Route 77Miles to Commuter Roadway

14

2

3


41/48

pp p y

37




Overall Score


14

2

10


42/48

38




Overall Score

School House LnMiles to Commuter Roadway

14

3

8


43/48

39 December 2007

Figure 24: Laurel Lake Municipal

Millville City




Overall Score

Laurel Lake Muinicipal

Miles to Commuter Roadway

14

3

9


44/48

40




Overall Score


12

2

8


45/48

41




Overall Score

Bridgeton Millville PikeMiles to Commuter Roadway

10

1

2


46/48


47/48


48/48

Documents

CCCTMA Cumberland County Bicycle Report