55
Comparison of Environmental Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Wood Treated with Impacts of Wood Treated with Three Three Different Arsenic-Free Preservatives Different Arsenic-Free Preservatives and and CCA CCA CCA-TAG Meeting CCA-TAG Meeting B. Dubey B. Dubey 1 , T. Townsend , T. Townsend 1 , H. Solo-Gabriele , H. Solo-Gabriele 2 1 University of Florida, Dept. of Environ. Eng. University of Florida, Dept. of Environ. Eng. Sciences Sciences 2 University of Miami, Dept. of Civil, Arch. And University of Miami, Dept. of Civil, Arch. And Environ Engineering Environ Engineering August 18, 2005

CCA-TAG Meeting

  • Upload
    cady

  • View
    25

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Wood Treated with Three Different Arsenic-Free Preservatives and CCA. CCA-TAG Meeting B. Dubey 1 , T. Townsend 1 , H. Solo-Gabriele 2 1 University of Florida, Dept. of Environ. Eng. Sciences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CCA-TAG Meeting

Comparison of Environmental Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Wood Treated with Impacts of Wood Treated with Three Three Different Arsenic-Free Preservatives Different Arsenic-Free Preservatives

and and CCACCA

CCA-TAG MeetingCCA-TAG Meeting

B. DubeyB. Dubey11, T. Townsend, T. Townsend11, H. Solo-Gabriele, H. Solo-Gabriele2211University of Florida, Dept. of Environ. Eng. SciencesUniversity of Florida, Dept. of Environ. Eng. Sciences

22University of Miami, Dept. of Civil, Arch. And Environ University of Miami, Dept. of Civil, Arch. And Environ EngineeringEngineering

August 18, 2005

Page 2: CCA-TAG Meeting

Research ObjectiveResearch Objective

Compare and contrast the potential Compare and contrast the potential environmental impact of wood treated with environmental impact of wood treated with arsenic and chromium free preservatives arsenic and chromium free preservatives with that from CCA-treated wood with that from CCA-treated wood

Page 3: CCA-TAG Meeting

Specific ObjectivesSpecific Objectives

1.1. Leachate characterization for heavy Leachate characterization for heavy metals in the leachate produced on co-metals in the leachate produced on co-disposal of pressure-treated wood in C&D disposal of pressure-treated wood in C&D and MSW landfill environmentand MSW landfill environment

2.2. Impact of surface water conditions on Impact of surface water conditions on chemical leaching and aquatic toxicity of chemical leaching and aquatic toxicity of pressure-treated wood pressure-treated wood

3.3. Impact on soil from pressure- treated Impact on soil from pressure- treated wood leachateswood leachates

Page 4: CCA-TAG Meeting

Pressure Treated Wood Being Pressure Treated Wood Being EvaluatedEvaluated

• ACQ : Alkaline Copper QuaternaryACQ : Alkaline Copper Quaternary• CBA : Copper Boron AzoleCBA : Copper Boron Azole• DOT : Disodium Octaborate DOT : Disodium Octaborate

Tetrahydrate Tetrahydrate • CCA : Chromated Copper ArsenateCCA : Chromated Copper Arsenate

Page 5: CCA-TAG Meeting

Leachate characterization for heavy Leachate characterization for heavy metals in the leachate produced on co-metals in the leachate produced on co-disposal of pressure-treated wood in disposal of pressure-treated wood in C&D and MSW environmentC&D and MSW environment

-Simulated C&D landfill environment-Simulated C&D landfill environment

-Leaching with MSW leachate-Leaching with MSW leachate

Disposal ScenariosDisposal Scenarios

Page 6: CCA-TAG Meeting

The county provideda large area near apaved road for locating the lysimeters.

Page 7: CCA-TAG Meeting

The driller used a 3-ft bucket auger.

Page 8: CCA-TAG Meeting

The hole prior to lysimeter installation. 15 ft deep.

Page 9: CCA-TAG Meeting
Page 10: CCA-TAG Meeting
Page 11: CCA-TAG Meeting
Page 12: CCA-TAG Meeting
Page 13: CCA-TAG Meeting
Page 14: CCA-TAG Meeting

The annulus of the holes was backfilled with sand.

Page 15: CCA-TAG Meeting

Thermocouple wires were included for temperature measurement.

Page 16: CCA-TAG Meeting

Waste Composition for Simulated C&D Landfill Waste Composition for Simulated C&D Landfill

33%

30%

14%

12%

8%

1% 1%1%

UT WoodConcreteRoofingDrywallCardboardFerrousInsulationSteel

Page 17: CCA-TAG Meeting

Waste Composition for Co-disposal of ACQ in Waste Composition for Co-disposal of ACQ in Simulated C&D LandfillSimulated C&D Landfill

5% 1%5%

23%

29%

14%

12%

8%

1% 1%1%

LBPHg LampACQUT WoodConcreteRoofingDrywallCardboardNon FerrousInsulationSteel

Page 18: CCA-TAG Meeting

Waste Composition for Co-disposal of CCA in Waste Composition for Co-disposal of CCA in Simulated C&D LandfillSimulated C&D Landfill

5% 1%5%

23%

29%

14%

12%

8%

1%1%

1%

LBPHg LampCCAUT WoodConcreteRoofingDrywallCardboardNon FerrousInsulationSteel

Page 19: CCA-TAG Meeting

Cutting wood into smaller pieces

Page 20: CCA-TAG Meeting

ACQLead based paintCCA

Page 21: CCA-TAG Meeting

Loading the ColumnLoading the Column

Page 22: CCA-TAG Meeting
Page 23: CCA-TAG Meeting

C&D Lysimeters

Page 24: CCA-TAG Meeting

C&D LBP, CCA, Hg lamps

• Wood blocks added during mixing

• Wood blocks throughout lysimeter

• Hg lamps were broken inside lysimeter, starting after first lift

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

River Rock

LBP, CCA

LBP, CCA

Hg lamps

Page 25: CCA-TAG Meeting

C&D LBP, ACQ, Hg lamps

• Same as C&D lysimeter with CCA wood, but ACQ treated wood used instead. LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

River Rock

LBP, ACQ

LBP, ACQ

Hg lamps

Page 26: CCA-TAG Meeting

Compacting the WasteCompacting the Waste

Page 27: CCA-TAG Meeting
Page 28: CCA-TAG Meeting

Water addition

Page 29: CCA-TAG Meeting

Filling sampling bottles

Page 30: CCA-TAG Meeting

Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun

pH

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

C&D Control C&D CCA C&D ACQ

Page 31: CCA-TAG Meeting

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

OR

P

-300

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

C&D Control C&D CCA C&D ACQ

Page 32: CCA-TAG Meeting

9/1/04 11/1/04 1/1/05 3/1/05 5/1/05 7/1/05

Ars

enic

(mg/

L)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

C&D Control C&D CCA C&D ACQ

Page 33: CCA-TAG Meeting

9/1/04 11/1/04 1/1/05 3/1/05 5/1/05 7/1/05

Chr

omiu

m (m

g/L)

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

0.22

C&D Control C&D CCA C&D ACQ

Page 34: CCA-TAG Meeting

9/1/04 11/1/04 1/1/05 3/1/05 5/1/05 7/1/05

Bor

on (m

g/L)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

C&D Control C&D CCA C&D ACQ

Page 35: CCA-TAG Meeting

• Copper was below detect in all three C&D column leachates throughout the duration of experiment

Page 36: CCA-TAG Meeting

Batch Test Results• Blocks of CCA and

ACQ were leached in leachates from the control columns.

• The results were compared to results from leaching blocks using the TCLP and SPLP.

Page 37: CCA-TAG Meeting

Sawdust

TCLP SPLP C&D Leachate0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

TCLP SPLP C&D Leachate

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/L)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0100 gm Blocks

Arsenic Copper Chromium

As

Cu

Cr

Leaching of CCA Blocks

Page 38: CCA-TAG Meeting

100 gm Blocks

TCLP SPLP C&D Leachate

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/L)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Copper Boron

TCLP SPLP C&D Leachate0

10

20

30

40

50

60Sawdust

Leaching of ACQ Blocks

Copper

Boron

Page 39: CCA-TAG Meeting

• Minimal leaching of copper observed suggesting that disposal of copper-based wood preservatives posses minimal impact to groundwater from copper leaching

• What will happen if the landfill gets aerobic over a long period??

Page 40: CCA-TAG Meeting

Leaching of treated wood sawdust Leaching of treated wood sawdust with MSW landfill leachatewith MSW landfill leachate

• Sawdust samples of CCA, ACQ, CBA and Borate treated wood was prepared from treated wood lumber

• 26 MSW landfill leachate samples were collected to use as the leaching fluid

• Batch leaching test of TCLP, SPLP and WET was also conducted for comparison

Page 41: CCA-TAG Meeting

Solid Waste Size Reduce toLess Than 1 cm

Leach 100 g for 18 hours at 30 RPM

Filter Solidsfrom Leachate

Analyze LeachateX mg/L

Page 42: CCA-TAG Meeting

MSW TCLP SPLP WET

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/L)

0.1

1

10

100As Cr Cu

CCA

Page 43: CCA-TAG Meeting

MSW TCLP SPLP WET

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/L)

1

10

100

Cu B ACQ

Page 44: CCA-TAG Meeting

CBA

MSW TCLP SPLP WET

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/L)

10

100

Cu B

Page 45: CCA-TAG Meeting

Borate

MSW TCLP SPLP WET

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/L)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160Boron

Page 46: CCA-TAG Meeting

Summary of results for MSW Summary of results for MSW leaching studyleaching study

• Metals leach from pressure treated wood when leached with landfill leachate

• Leaching concentrations from the pressure treated wood vary with leachate quality

• Results indicate that the co-disposal of treated wood with municipal solid waste could impact the leachate quality

Page 47: CCA-TAG Meeting

Impact of surface water conditions Impact of surface water conditions on chemical leaching and aquatic on chemical leaching and aquatic toxicity of pressure-treated woodtoxicity of pressure-treated wood

Page 48: CCA-TAG Meeting

Parameters being measuredParameters being measured

• Total copper, free copper and toxicity Total copper, free copper and toxicity analysis using MetPlate and Algal analysis using MetPlate and Algal assay will be performed on each wood assay will be performed on each wood block leachateblock leachate

• Samples will also be analyzed for Samples will also be analyzed for TOC, TDS, alkalinity and anionsTOC, TDS, alkalinity and anions

Page 49: CCA-TAG Meeting

Some preliminary leaching dataSome preliminary leaching data

Average Total Copper (mg/L) Aquatic Toxicity EC50 (%)

Final pH Sample Type

DI NW-1 NW-2 DI NW-1 NW-2 DI NW-1 NW-2

CCA 1.50 0.25 0.46 9.3 68.8 35.3 5.38 6.89 5.51 ACQ 5.25 3.05 3.63 10.0 27.2 24.5 5.98 6.81 6.09 CBA 20.5 12.7 16.5 2.7 9.4 6.4 6.07 6.65 5.81

Page 50: CCA-TAG Meeting

Impact on soil from pressure- Impact on soil from pressure- treated wood leachatestreated wood leachates

Page 51: CCA-TAG Meeting

Decks have been set up at Solar Energy Research Park, UF

Page 52: CCA-TAG Meeting

Soil column in lab with three soils

Page 53: CCA-TAG Meeting

Parameters being analyzed

• Preservative components, pH, ORP, Conductivity in leachate and soil

• Soil samples being characterized for pH, OM, CEC, Grain size distribution etc.

Page 54: CCA-TAG Meeting

In summary

• Out of 4 experiments comparing the treated wood, two have been completed and two are underway

• Results from uncompleted experiments will be updated in the subsequent meetings

Page 55: CCA-TAG Meeting

Questions?Questions?