6

Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 2: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 3: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 4: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 5: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 6: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial