Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TA
BL
E O
F JU
DIC
IAL
RE
VIE
W C
ASE
S
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
1.
4 W
ins L
eisu
re L
td v
The
Lice
nsin
g C
omm
ittee
for
Blac
kpoo
l Cou
ncil
& O
ther
s[2
007]
EW
HC
221
3 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Lice
nsin
gLi
cens
ing
Act
2003
Rev
iew
of l
icen
sing
pan
el’s
deci
sion
that
W w
as n
ot a
nin
tere
sted
par
ty fo
r the
pur
pose
sof
the
2003
Act
con
cern
ing
anap
plic
atio
n w
hich
had
bee
nsu
bmitt
ed b
y an
othe
r com
pany
for a
new
pre
mis
es li
cens
e.A
llege
d th
at p
anel
’s d
ecis
ion
irrat
iona
l, an
d fu
rther
that
it h
adfa
iled
to ta
ke a
ccou
nt o
f mat
eria
lfa
ctor
s.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
2.
Abbe
y M
ine
Ltd
v Th
e C
oal
Auth
ority
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
189
(Adm
in)
ND
PBD
ecis
ion
tore
fuse
am
inin
g lic
ence
Coa
l Ind
ustry
Act
199
4Ill
egal
ity, i
rrat
iona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
1 Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt: w
hich
cen
tral g
over
nmen
t dep
artm
ent (
incl
udin
g ex
ecut
ive
agen
cies
of p
artic
ular
gov
ernm
enta
l dep
artm
ents
eg
pris
on se
rvic
e sh
ould
be
liste
d as
Hom
eO
ffic
e), N
on-D
epar
tmen
tal P
ublic
Bod
ies (
“ND
PB”)
(eg
Fina
ncia
l Ser
vice
s Aut
horit
y, L
aw C
omm
issi
on),
devo
lved
adm
inis
tratio
n (e
g Th
e N
atio
nal A
ssem
bly
for W
ales
),lo
cal a
utho
rity,
loca
l edu
catio
n au
thor
ity (i
nclu
ding
scho
ol g
over
nors
), N
HS
and
PCTs
, trib
unal
s, om
buds
men
, oth
er lo
cal a
genc
ies,
polic
e, o
ther
em
erge
ncy
serv
ices
(not
incl
udin
g po
lice)
.2 B
road
are
a of
law
: whe
ther
edu
catio
n cl
aim
, pla
nnin
g cl
aim
, im
mig
ratio
n de
cisi
ons,
extra
ditio
n, o
r brie
f des
crip
tion
if fe
lt ne
cess
ary
etc.
Not
e: n
o cr
imin
al.
3 Eg:
Ille
galit
y, ir
ratio
nalit
y, p
roce
dura
l im
prop
riety
, cla
im u
nder
the
Hum
an R
ight
s Act
199
8, E
U la
w.
4 Eg:
Qua
shin
g or
der,
proh
ibiti
ng o
rder
, man
dato
ry o
rder
, inj
unct
ions
, dec
lara
tion,
dam
ages
.5 E
g: w
hat r
emed
ies,
if an
y, w
ere
gran
ted
eg Q
uash
ing
orde
r, in
junc
tion
etc.
6 Con
side
r whe
ther
the
stat
utor
y re
gim
e en
visa
ges t
he ty
pe o
f los
s and
the
cate
gory
of c
laim
ant.
7 Fac
tors
to b
e ta
ken
into
acc
ount
in a
sses
sing
serio
us fa
ult:
clar
ity o
f sta
tuto
ry re
gim
e; d
egre
e of
dis
cret
ion;
com
plex
ity o
f tas
k; w
heth
er th
ere
was
an
inte
ntio
nal b
reac
h.
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
3.
Abu
Ride
h v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
tefo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t[2
007]
EW
HC
223
7 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Con
trol o
rder
sPr
even
tion
ofTe
rror
ism
Act
200
5
App
eal a
gain
st th
e m
odifi
catio
nof
con
trol o
rder
. Alle
ged
that
mod
ified
con
trol o
rder
cons
titut
ed b
reac
h of
Art
5, 3
and
8 of
the
ECH
R.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
N/A
N/A
4.
AF v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 2
001
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Con
trol o
rder
Prev
entio
n of
Terr
oris
mA
ct 2
005
App
eal a
gain
st re
fusa
l of S
S to
mod
ify a
con
trol o
rder
.A
llow
ed in
part.
Yes
No
N/A
5.
Akpa
ta v
Gen
eral
Med
ical
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
713
(Adm
in)
ND
PBPr
ofes
sion
alre
gula
tion
Med
ical
Act
1983
/G
ener
alM
edic
alC
ounc
il(F
itnes
s to
Prac
tise)
Rul
es O
rder
of C
ounc
il20
04
App
eal a
gain
st d
ecis
ion
ofFi
tnes
s to
Prac
tise
Pane
l tha
t A’s
nam
e sh
ould
be
eras
ed fr
omR
egis
ter.
A so
ught
adj
ourn
men
tof
pan
el h
earin
g w
hich
was
refu
sed.
Alle
ged
that
(1) p
anel
had
erre
d in
refu
sing
requ
est (
2)pa
nel’s
find
ings
of f
act i
ncor
rect
(3) e
rasu
re u
nfai
r and
disp
ropo
rtion
ate
(4) p
anel
sfa
ilure
to c
omm
ent o
n ad
vers
em
edia
unf
air
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
6.
Aldo
gen
v Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
586
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
and
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esR
evie
w o
f SS’
s dec
isio
ndi
smis
sing
A’s
app
licat
ion
for
leav
e to
rem
ain
unde
r the
Turk
ish-
EC A
ssoc
iatio
nA
gree
men
t.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
7.
Andr
easo
n v
Secr
etar
y of
Stat
ute
for t
he H
ome
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Asy
lum
and
Nat
iona
lity,
Imm
igra
tion
Rev
iew
of S
S’s d
ecis
ion
toce
rtify
A’s
asy
lum
app
licat
ion
asA
llow
ed. A
narr
owly
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
2578
(Adm
in)
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
and
Asy
lum
Act
200
2cl
early
unf
ound
ed. I
ssue
-w
heth
er, o
n th
e av
aila
ble
mat
eria
l, A
's cl
aim
cou
ld n
otsu
ccee
d in
fron
t of a
nim
mig
ratio
n ju
dge.
satis
fied
the
requ
irem
ent
that
the
mat
ter
was
arg
uabl
ean
d th
at h
iscl
aim
wou
ldno
t ine
vita
bly
be re
ject
ed b
yan im
mig
ratio
nju
dge.
8.
Anth
ony
Cre
an v
Gov
ernm
ent
of Ir
elan
d [2
007]
EW
HC
814
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
, bre
ach
of A
rt 8
ofH
RA
(app
eal)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
9.
Anti-
Was
te L
td v
Env
iron
men
tAg
ency
[200
7] E
WH
C 7
17(A
dmin
)
NPD
BEn
viro
nmen
tLa
ndfil
l(E
ngla
nd a
ndW
ales
)R
egul
atio
ns20
02
Rev
iew
age
ncy’
s ref
usal
to g
rant
perm
its to
allo
w A
to d
epos
itw
aste
in tw
o la
ndfil
l site
s on
grou
nds t
hat “
pigg
ybac
king
” no
tpe
rmitt
ed. S
ough
t Qua
shin
gor
der a
nd d
ecla
ratio
ns to
esta
blis
h tru
e co
nstru
ctio
n of
mat
eria
l pro
visi
ons i
nR
egul
atio
ns.
Allo
wed
.D
ecla
ratio
nsgr
ante
d in
favo
ur o
fcl
aim
ant.
Bot
hde
clar
atio
nssu
bseq
uent
lyqu
ashe
d by
Cou
rt of
App
eal i
n[2
007]
EW
CA
Civ
137
7.
Yes
No
N/A
10.
Ashm
an v
Par
ole
Boar
d &
Cen
tral
Crim
e an
dC
rimin
alA
alle
ged
that
con
tinua
tion
of h
isA
llow
ed.
Yes
N/A
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Anot
her [
2007
] EW
HC
264
7(A
dmin
)G
over
nmen
tD
epar
tmen
tpe
nolo
gyJu
stic
e A
ct20
03de
tent
ion
beyo
nd th
e ex
piry
of
min
imum
term
with
out
reas
onab
le st
eps h
avin
g be
enta
ken
to a
sses
s whe
ther
cont
inue
d de
tent
ion
just
ified
was
brea
ch o
f Art
5(4)
of E
CH
R.
Soug
ht d
ecla
ratio
n an
dm
anda
tory
ord
er th
at P
arol
eB
oard
hea
ring
take
pla
ce in
7da
ys.
Dec
lara
tory
relie
f gra
nted
.M
anda
tory
orde
r ref
used
.
11.
Ashw
ell P
rope
rty
Gro
up P
lcan
d An
or v
Cam
brid
ge C
ityC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
175
3(A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n),
proc
edur
al im
prop
riety
Qua
shin
g (a
ppea
l)
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
12.
Asse
ts R
ecov
ery
Agen
cy v
Kea
n [2
007]
EW
HC
112
(Adm
in)
ND
PBA
sset
sR
ecov
ery/
Civ
ilPr
oced
ure
Proc
eeds
of
Crim
e A
ct20
02, a
sam
ende
d.
App
licat
ion
to se
t asi
de a
prop
erty
free
zing
ord
er o
ngr
ound
s tha
t AR
A h
ad n
o go
odar
guab
le c
laim
to th
e pr
oper
ty,
the
orde
r was
obt
aine
d in
bre
ach
of d
uty
of fu
ll an
d fr
ank
disc
losu
re a
nd p
roce
edin
gs a
nab
use
of p
roce
ss
Dis
mis
sed.
Alth
ough
obta
ined
by
non-
disc
losu
rean
d in
noce
ntm
isre
pres
enta
tio
n at
aw
ithou
t not
ice
hear
ing,
AR
A’s
mis
judg
emen
tha
d no
t bee
nse
rious
; a
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
broa
d, m
erits
-ba
sed
eval
uatio
n of
all t
heci
rcum
stan
ces
foun
d no
abus
e of
proc
ess.
13.
Awey
s &
Oth
ers v
Birm
ingh
am C
ity C
ounc
il[2
007]
EW
HC
52
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Hou
sing
/H
omel
ess
Hou
sing
Act
1996
(1) I
llega
lity
– re
view
of t
heLo
cal A
utho
rity’
s hou
sing
allo
catio
n po
licy
for t
heho
mel
ess
(2) B
reac
h of
Art
8 of
EC
HR
(1) A
llow
ed –
polic
yun
law
ful.
Arg
umen
t to
be h
eard
on
appr
opria
teor
ders
(2) A
rgua
ble
Yes
Yes
. Con
sist
ent
brea
ch o
f cle
arst
atut
ory
duty
.
Yes
14.
Bald
er v
Gen
eral
Med
ical
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
054
(Adm
in)
ND
PBPr
ofes
sion
alre
gula
tion
Med
ical
Act
1983
App
eal a
gain
st G
MC
’s d
ecis
ion
to e
rase
B fr
om R
egis
ter a
s are
sult
of c
onvi
ctio
ns. A
llege
dth
at sa
nctio
n to
o se
vere
, GM
Cfa
iled
to h
ave
prop
er re
gard
toce
rtain
mat
ters
put
bef
ore
it an
dit
had
acte
d un
fairl
y in
prev
entin
g B
from
pro
perly
putti
ng fo
rwar
d m
atte
rs h
ew
ishe
d to
.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
15.
Bald
ing
v Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
Cen
tral
Soci
al se
curit
ySo
cial
Alle
ged
that
DW
P ha
dA
llow
ed.
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
for W
ork
and
Pens
ions
[200
7]EW
HC
759
(Adm
in)
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Secu
rity
Adm
inis
tratio
n A
ct 1
992
and
Inso
lven
cyA
ct 1
986
wro
ngfu
lly d
educ
ted
sum
s for
over
paid
ben
efits
, a li
abili
ty/d
ebt
from
whi
ch h
e re
leas
ed w
hen
hew
as d
isch
arge
d fr
om b
ankr
uptc
y.
16.
Bam
ber v
HM
Rev
enue
&C
usto
ms [
2007
] EW
HC
798
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
Tax
No
B c
laim
ed h
e ha
d de
trim
enta
llyre
lied
on a
flat
rate
exp
ense
allo
wan
ce a
gree
men
t ent
ered
into
by
the
Com
mis
sion
ers (
from
whi
ch th
ey la
ter r
esile
d) a
ndth
eref
ore
he w
as e
ntitl
ed to
kee
pth
e ag
reem
ent i
n fo
rce
betw
een
him
self
and
Com
mis
sion
ers o
nba
sis t
hat t
here
wou
ld o
ther
wis
ebe
subs
tant
ial u
nfai
rnes
s.
Dam
ages
; Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
No
No
N/A
17.
Banf
ield
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for J
ustic
e [2
007]
EW
HC
2605
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Sent
enci
ngC
rime
(Sen
tenc
es)
Act
199
7/C
rimin
alJu
stic
e A
ct20
03
Rev
iew
of S
S’s d
ecis
ion
not t
otra
nsfe
r B, p
rison
er se
rvin
g lif
ese
nten
ce, t
o op
en c
ondi
tions
.C
halle
nge
base
d on
2 g
roun
ds(1
) pro
cedu
ral u
nfai
rnes
s (2)
irrat
iona
lity
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
18.
Bayr
akta
rgol
u v
Sout
hC
ambr
idge
shir
e D
istr
ict
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 9
64(A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng(G
ener
al
Rev
iew
of L
ocal
Aut
horit
y’s
deci
sion
to g
rant
list
ed b
uild
ing
cons
ent a
nd p
lann
ing
perm
issi
on–
alle
ged
that
(1) d
ecis
ion
was
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Dev
elop
men
tPr
oced
ure)
Ord
er 1
995
(?)
fund
amen
tally
flaw
ed (2
) was
inbr
each
of P
lann
ing
Polic
yG
uida
nce,
and
(3) L
ocal
Aut
horit
y ha
d ta
ken
into
acc
ount
imm
ater
ial c
onsi
dera
tions
19.
BBC
v S
ugar
[200
7] E
WH
C90
5 (A
dmin
)Tr
ibun
alM
edia
and
Ente
rtain
men
tFr
eedo
m o
fIn
form
atio
nA
ct 2
000
Cha
lleng
e to
Info
rmat
ion
Com
mis
sion
er’s
dec
isio
n no
t to
orde
r rel
ease
of B
BC
repo
rt
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
20.
Belfi
elds
Ltd
v S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e fo
r Com
mun
ities
and
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
304
0 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Acq
uisi
tion
of L
and
Act
1981
Proc
edur
al im
prop
riety
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
N/A
N/A
N/A
21.
Bens
on v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rJu
stic
e [2
007]
EW
HC
205
5(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Crim
e an
dPe
nolo
gyC
rimin
alJu
stic
e A
ct20
03
Rev
iew
of S
S’s d
ecis
ion
tore
fuse
app
eal a
gain
st th
e ea
rlier
deci
sion
to re
voke
B’s
rele
ase
onlic
ence
and
retu
rn h
im to
cust
ody.
Alle
ged
that
(1) t
he a
ppea
l sys
tem
, con
tain
edin
the
2003
Act
, was
inco
mpa
tible
with
Art
5(4)
of
ECH
R a
s the
re w
as n
oin
depe
nden
t ass
essm
ent o
f the
deci
sion
;
(2) B
’s a
ppea
l aga
inst
the
Allo
wed
on
basi
s of
grou
nd (2
).Q
uash
edde
cisi
on a
ndre
mitt
edm
atte
r for
fres
hco
nsid
erat
ion.
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
deci
sion
had
bee
n pr
oced
ural
lyun
fair
as h
e w
as n
ot g
iven
apr
oper
opp
ortu
nity
to m
eet t
heal
lega
tions
aga
inst
him
.R
emed
ies s
ough
t – Q
uash
ing
orde
r and
HR
dam
ages
.
22.
Bew
ry v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rth
e H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
271
1 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Pris
on re
cord
sPr
ison
Act
1952
/ Pris
onR
ules
199
9
Rev
iew
of S
S’s d
ecis
ion
tore
fuse
B, f
orm
er m
embe
r of
inde
pend
ent m
onito
ring
boar
d of
a pr
ison
, acc
ess t
o pr
ison
file
s.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
23.
Bick
nell
v H
M C
oron
er fo
rBi
rmin
gham
[200
7] E
WH
C25
47 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lag
ency
Cor
oner
,w
heth
er to
hold
inqu
est
Cor
oner
s Act
1988
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
, and
deci
sion
sent
to S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e
Yes
No
No,
no
dam
age.
24.
Blac
kbur
n-Sm
ith v
Lam
beth
LBC
[200
7] E
WH
C 7
67(A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Soci
al w
elfa
reC
hild
ren
Act
1989
Rev
iew
of L
ocal
Aut
horit
y’s
deci
sion
to c
ease
pro
vidi
ng B
San
d he
r chi
ldre
n w
ithac
com
mod
atio
n an
d fin
anci
alsu
ppor
t whi
ch, i
t was
alle
ged,
was
unl
awfu
l, pe
rver
se a
ndirr
atio
nal
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
. The
rele
vant
sect
ion
in th
eC
hild
ren
Act
1989
(s 1
7)m
akes
prov
isio
n fo
ras
sist
ance
/acc
om
mod
atio
n to
fam
ilym
embe
rs o
fch
ildre
n (a
sw
ell a
sch
ildre
n
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
them
selv
es) i
fpr
ovid
ed w
itha
view
tosa
fegu
ardi
ngor
pro
mot
ing
the
child
’sw
elfa
re.
25.
Boim
a v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
rth
e H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
257
9 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
and
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esR
evie
w o
f SS’
s ref
usal
toco
nsid
er B
’s a
sylu
m c
laim
as a
fres
h cl
aim
. Dec
isio
nun
reas
onab
le a
nd b
reac
h of
Art
8of
EC
HR
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
26.
Boyl
e v
Cri
min
al C
ases
Revi
ew C
omm
issi
on [2
007]
EWH
C 8
(Adm
in)
ND
PBR
evie
w o
fde
cisi
on o
fC
CR
C.
Man
dato
ryor
der,
decl
arat
ion.
Crim
inal
App
eal A
ct19
95
Proc
edur
al im
prop
riety
(del
ay,
HR
A A
rt 6,
bia
s)
Man
dato
ry o
rder
, dec
lara
tion
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
27.
Brad
ley
v Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for W
ork
and
Pens
ions
and
Parl
iam
enta
ry C
omm
issi
oner
for A
dmin
istr
atio
n [2
007]
EWH
C 2
42 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Om
buds
man
(mal
adm
inis
tratio
n, p
ensi
ons)
Parli
amen
tary
Com
mis
sion
er A
ct 1
967
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g an
d m
anda
tory
ord
ers
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
and
man
dato
ryor
ders
rega
rdin
g th
eSe
cret
ary
ofSt
ate’
sre
ject
ion
ofth
e
No
stat
ute
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Om
buds
man
’sfir
st fi
ndin
g
28.
Brew
er &
Oth
ers v
Thr
eeRi
vers
Dis
tric
t Cou
ncil
[200
7]EW
HC
129
0 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anin
g(T
rees
)R
egul
atio
ns19
99
B so
ught
to q
uash
Loc
alA
utho
rity’
s dec
isio
n to
con
firm
atre
e pr
eser
vatio
n or
der o
ngr
ound
s tha
t the
Loc
al A
utho
rity
had
faile
d to
dea
l tho
roug
hly,
cons
cien
tious
ly o
r fai
rly w
ithth
eir o
bjec
tions
in c
ontra
vent
ion
of th
e R
egs
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
29.
Bria
n C
onno
lly v
The
Law
Soci
ety
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
175
(Adm
in)
ND
PBSo
licito
r’s
disc
iplin
ary
mat
ter
Solic
itors
Act
1974
Illeg
ality
App
eal
allo
wed
inre
latio
n to
four
char
ges,
dism
isse
d in
rela
tion
toot
hers
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
30.
Brita
nnia
Dev
elop
men
ts L
td v
Secr
etar
y o
f Sta
te fo
rC
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
tan
d An
othe
r [20
07] E
WH
C81
2 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent,
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(fai
lure
to ta
ke re
leva
ntco
nsid
erat
ion
into
acc
ount
)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.
Qua
shin
gor
der.
Dec
isio
nre
mitt
ed
Yes
No
No
loss
31.
Brow
n v
Gov
erno
r of
Belm
arsh
Pri
son
[200
7]EW
HC
498
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Hab
eas c
orpu
s.Ex
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
(ultr
a vi
res)
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Hab
eas c
orpu
s
32.
Brya
nt v
Law
Soc
iety
[200
7]EW
HC
304
3 (A
dmin
)Tr
ibun
alPr
ofes
sion
alco
nduc
t –so
licito
rs
Solic
itors
Act
1974
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n; fa
ilure
toap
ply
dish
ones
ty te
st; f
ailu
re to
cons
ider
rele
vant
con
side
ratio
n)
Qua
shin
g or
der
App
eals
allo
wed
inpa
rt.
Pena
lties
wer
ere
duce
d - H
'sst
ruck
off
role
repl
aced
by
2yr
susp
ensi
on;
R's
3 yr
susp
ensi
onre
plac
ed b
y a
9 m
onth
ssu
spen
sion
Yes
Yes
– si
mila
rfa
cts a
nd b
asis
as D
onki
n(a
bove
). Se
rious
lega
l err
or in
mis
appl
ying
dish
ones
ty te
st;
failu
re to
cons
ider
evid
ence
as t
ogo
od c
hara
cter
;no
t all
fact
s of
Law
Soc
iety
case
pro
ved
No,
alth
ough
sent
ence
sw
ere
redu
ced,
they
bot
hw
ould
hav
ebe
enpr
even
ted
from
prac
tisin
gbe
twee
nor
igin
alde
cisi
onan
dap
peal
edde
cisi
on.
33.
Bullm
ore
and
Anot
her v
Wes
tH
ertfo
rdsh
ire
Hos
pita
ls N
HS
Trus
t [20
07] E
WH
C 1
636
(Adm
in)
NH
S PC
TPr
ovis
ion
ofac
ute
serv
ices
Hea
lth a
ndSo
cial
Car
eA
ct 2
001
Proc
edur
al im
prop
riety
, ille
galit
y(f
ailu
re to
take
acc
ount
of
rele
vant
con
side
ratio
ns) N
otst
ated
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
34.
C a
nd S
v S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Nee
ds a
nd D
isab
ility
Tri
buna
lan
d An
othe
r [20
07] E
WH
C18
12 (A
dmin
)
Trib
unal
Plac
emen
t of
child
with
SEN
Educ
atio
nA
ct 1
996
Irra
tiona
lity
(rea
son-
givi
ng,
unre
ason
able
ness
)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
35.
Cal
dare
lli v
The
Cou
rt o
fN
aple
s [20
07] E
WH
C 1
624
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
, pro
cedu
ral i
mpr
oprie
ty(H
RA
Art
6, b
ad fa
ith)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
36.
Cal
haem
v G
ener
al M
edic
alC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
260
6(A
dmin
)
ND
PBPr
ofes
sion
alre
gula
tion
Med
ical
Act
1983
App
eal a
gain
st F
itnes
s to
Prac
tice
Pane
l’s d
ecis
ion
tosu
spen
d C
from
regi
ster
for 3
mon
ths.
Alle
ged
that
pan
el:
(1) m
ade
erro
rs in
its f
indi
ngs o
ffa
cts
(2) w
as w
rong
to fi
ndim
pairm
ent o
n th
e ba
sis o
fm
isco
nduc
t and
def
icie
ntpr
ofes
sion
al p
erfo
rman
ce
(3) s
uspe
nsio
n w
as w
rong
inpr
inci
ple,
exc
essi
ve a
nddi
spro
porti
onat
e
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
inpa
rt.
(1) R
ejec
ted
(2) P
anel
’sfin
ding
of
impa
irmen
tth
roug
hm
isco
nduc
tup
held
but
its
findi
ng o
fde
ficie
ntpr
ofes
sion
alpe
rfor
man
cequ
ashe
d.
(3) A
s a re
sult
of d
ecis
ion
conc
erni
ng(2
), or
der o
fsu
spen
sion
quas
hed.
Con
side
red
that
Yes
No
Yes
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
adm
onis
hmen
tw
ould
be
asu
ffic
ient
sanc
tion.
37.
Cam
den
Lock
(Lon
don)
Ltd
vLo
ndon
Bor
ough
of C
amde
n[2
007]
EW
HC
495
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(rel
evan
t/irr
elev
ant
cons
ider
atio
ns)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.
Qua
shin
gor
der
Yes
No
– fa
ilure
tota
ke in
toac
coun
t are
leva
ntco
nsid
erat
ion
isno
t suf
ficie
nt in
thes
e ci
rcs t
oco
nstit
ute
serio
us fa
ult.
No
loss
38.
Caw
ley
v Pa
role
Boa
rd &
Anot
her [
2007
] EW
HC
264
9(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Crim
e an
dpe
nolo
gyPa
role
Boa
rdR
ules
Rev
iew
of P
arol
e B
oard
’sde
cisi
on to
def
er C
’s p
arol
ehe
arin
g fo
r 4th
tim
e. A
llege
dbr
each
of A
rt 5(
4) (r
ight
tosp
eedy
hea
ring)
. NB
: no
clai
mfo
r dam
ages
Allo
wed
.D
ecla
rato
ryre
lief g
rant
ed.
Yes
N/A
N/A
39.
Cea
uses
cu v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t and
Oth
ers [
2007
] EW
HC
142
3(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Extra
ditio
nap
peal
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Irra
tiona
lity,
hum
an ri
ghts
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
40.
Cen
tral
Exa
min
ing
Cou
rt o
fth
e N
atio
nal C
ourt
of M
adri
dD
istri
ctJu
dge
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Act
200
3Ill
egal
ity (m
isdi
rect
ion)
Allo
wed
No
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
v C
ity o
f Wes
tmin
ster
Mag
istr
ates
' Cou
rt [2
007]
EWH
C 2
059
(Adm
in)
Qua
shin
g or
der
41.
Cha
babe
v B
onn
Publ
icPr
osec
utor
s Offi
ce [2
007]
EWH
C 2
88 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Rev
iew
of c
ourts
dec
isio
n on
bar
to e
xtra
ditio
n by
virt
ue o
fpa
ssag
e of
tim
e
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
42.
Che
n v
The
Gov
ernm
ent o
fRo
man
ia a
nd A
noth
er
Mito
i v T
he G
over
nmen
t of
Rom
ania
and
Ano
ther
[200
7] E
WH
C 5
20 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Act
200
3C
hen
– ill
egal
ity (m
isdi
rect
ion)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Mito
i – il
lega
lity
(mis
dire
ctio
n)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Che
n –
Dis
mis
sed.
Mito
i –D
ism
isse
d (J
Rag
ains
tSS
HD
);A
llow
ed(A
ppea
l fro
mdi
stric
t jud
ge).
Qua
shed
Che
n –
Yes
Mito
i – Y
es;
yes
Che
n –
No
Mito
i – N
o; n
o
Che
n –
No
Mito
i – N
o;ye
s
43.
Coo
k v
Gen
eral
Com
mis
sion
ers o
f Inc
ome
Tax
& A
noth
er [2
007]
EW
HC
167
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Tax
Taxe
sM
anag
emen
tA
ct 1
970
(1) R
evie
w o
f ref
usal
by
Com
mis
sion
ers t
o ex
tend
tim
efo
r lod
ging
app
eal.
Rem
edie
s sou
ght w
ere
Qua
shin
gor
der a
nd su
bstit
utio
nary
rem
edy
ie c
ourt
ough
t to
subs
titut
e its
own
findi
ng c
once
rnin
g
Allo
wed
.
Qua
shin
gor
der g
rant
ed
Yes
Bor
derli
ne.
Pote
ntia
llyex
cusa
ble
erro
rof
law
–pr
evio
us c
ase
on p
oint
; but
cler
k di
dn’t
dire
ct th
e
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
exte
nsio
n fo
r tha
t of
Com
mis
sion
ers
(2) A
ltern
ativ
ely,
pur
suit
byR
even
ue o
f ban
krup
tcy
proc
eedi
ngs w
as in
bad
faith
and/
or b
reac
h of
HR
.
Com
mis
sion
ers’
atte
ntio
n to
impo
rtant
cas
ew
hich
mea
ntth
at th
eyco
nstru
ed th
eir
disc
retio
nna
rrow
ly.
Cla
iman
t not
repr
esen
ted
(or
pres
ent)
athe
arin
g.C
omm
issi
oner
s’in
terp
reta
tion
base
d on
Rev
enue
’ssu
bmis
sion
sal
one.
44.
Coo
ke v
Rev
enue
and
Cus
tom
sC
omm
issi
oner
s [20
07] E
WH
C81
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
Tax
Taxe
sM
anag
emen
tA
ct 1
970
Rev
iew
of C
omm
issi
oner
sde
cisi
on to
serv
e on
solic
itor a
notic
e to
pro
duce
cer
tain
docu
men
ts re
latin
g to
the
clie
nt.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
45.
Cor
us v
Ere
was
h Bo
roug
hC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
248
6(A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Not
spec
ified
.Pr
ocee
ding
s to
quas
h a
hous
ing
plan
pro
duce
d by
Loc
alA
utho
rity.
C’s
pro
perty
had
bee
nre
mov
ed fr
om p
lan.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
ifst
atut
ory
basi
sex
ists
.
No
N/A
46.
Cov
entr
y C
ity C
ounc
il v
Spec
ial E
duca
tiona
l Nee
dsTr
ibun
alD
ecis
ion
of a
Spec
ial
Trib
unal
s and
Inqu
iries
Act
Illeg
ality
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
and
Dis
abili
ty T
ribu
nal a
ndAn
drew
Bro
wne
and
Mel
anie
Brow
ne [2
007]
EW
HC
227
8(A
dmin
)
Educ
atio
nal
Nee
ds a
ndD
isab
ility
Trib
unal
1992
;Ed
ucat
ion
Act
199
6
47.
Dar
a v
Publ
ic P
rose
cuto
r’s
Offi
ce a
t the
Reg
iona
l Cou
rt o
fM
arbu
rg, G
erm
any
[200
7]EW
HC
167
8 (A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
48.
Dar
ius S
kruo
dys v
Sia
ulia
iC
ity D
istr
ict C
ourt
Lith
uani
a[2
007]
EW
HC
119
2 (A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Res
tora
tion
of p
assp
ort
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
49.
Dar
lingt
on B
orou
gh C
ounc
il v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
rC
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
2762
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
9
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
50.
Dar
rell
Dix
on v
Lon
don
Boro
ugh
of W
ands
wor
th[2
007]
EW
HC
307
5 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lau
thor
ityH
ousi
ngH
ousi
ng A
ct19
96Ir
ratio
nalit
y; p
roce
dura
lim
prop
riety
; HR
AD
ism
isse
dN
/AN
/AN
/A
51.
Dim
moc
k v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
tefo
r Chi
ldre
n, S
choo
l and
Fam
ilies
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
288
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Educ
atio
nEd
ucat
ion
Act
199
6R
evie
w o
f SS’
s dec
isio
n to
dist
ribut
e to
eve
ry se
cond
ary
scho
ol in
UK
a c
opy
of a
Allo
wed
;gu
idan
ce n
ote
issu
ed w
ith th
e
Yes
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
(Adm
in)
Dep
artm
ent
parti
cula
r film
abo
ut g
loba
lw
arm
ing.
D, f
athe
r of 2
pup
ilsan
d sc
hool
gov
erno
r alle
ged
that
polic
y un
law
ful a
s it a
mou
nted
topr
omot
ion
of p
artis
an p
oliti
cal
view
s con
trary
to 1
996
Act
.D
ecla
ratio
n so
ught
.
film
was
flaw
ed. N
oor
der f
or re
lief
mad
e (a
s SS
had
give
nun
derta
king
sto
am
end
the
guid
ance
so a
sto
obv
iate
the
flaw
sid
entif
ied)
.
52.
Don
kin
v La
w S
ocie
ty [2
007]
EWH
C 4
14 (A
dmin
)Tr
ibun
alPr
ofes
sion
alco
nduc
t –so
licito
rs
Solic
itors
Act
1974
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n; fa
ilure
togi
ve a
dequ
ate
wei
ght t
o re
leva
ntco
nsid
erat
ion)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.
Qua
shin
gor
der.
Rem
itted
toTr
ibun
al fo
rde
cisi
on.
Yes
Yes
– T
here
was
sign
ifica
ntle
gal e
rror
inim
putin
g an
obje
ctiv
eel
emen
t int
o th
esu
bjec
tive
limb
of th
edi
shon
esty
test
and
faili
ng to
take
into
cons
ider
atio
nth
e ev
iden
ce th
ecl
aim
ant
addu
ced
as to
his c
hara
cter
and
cred
ibili
ty(w
hich
wen
t to
the
subj
ectiv
e
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
elem
ent o
f the
test
).
53.
Dr S
v T
he G
ener
al M
edic
alC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
325
7(A
dmin
)
ND
PBM
edic
alR
egis
tratio
nIll
egal
ityD
ism
isse
dN
/AN
/AN
/A
54.
Edw
ards
v T
he G
over
nmen
t of
the
USA
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
877
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Extra
ditio
nqu
ashe
d on
one
coun
t
Yes
No
(law
not
clea
r)N
o lo
ss
55.
Eisa
i Ltd
v N
atio
nal I
nstit
ute
for H
ealth
and
Clin
ical
Exce
llenc
e [2
007]
EW
HC
1941
(Adm
in)
ND
PBH
ealth
Nat
iona
lH
ealth
Serv
ices
Act
1977
/Nat
iona
l Ins
titut
e fo
rC
linic
alEx
celle
nce
(Est
ablis
hme
nt a
ndC
onst
itutio
n)O
rder
199
9
Rev
iew
of d
ecis
ion
of th
e A
ppea
lPa
nel o
f the
NIC
E an
d of
cons
eque
nt g
uida
nce
conc
erni
ngus
e of
cer
tain
dru
g to
trea
tsu
ffer
ers o
f Alz
heim
er’s
dis
ease
.C
halle
nge
on 3
gro
unds
(1)
proc
edur
al u
nfai
rnes
s (2)
disc
rimin
ator
y ef
fect
of r
igid
guid
ance
and
(3) I
rrat
iona
lity
ofce
rtain
dec
isio
ns o
f the
App
eal
Pane
l.
Allo
wed
inpa
rt.Su
ccee
ded
ongr
ound
(2)
only
.
Yes
on
grou
nd(1
) but
No
on(2
) and
(3)
No
No
56.
Emir
soly
a v
The
Paro
le B
oard
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
007
(Adm
in)
ND
PBC
rime
and
Peno
logy
Not
spec
ified
– C
rimin
alJu
stic
e A
ct20
03?
Pris
oner
soug
ht re
view
of P
arol
eB
oard
s dec
isio
n to
uph
old
deci
sion
of S
S to
reca
ll hi
m to
pris
on. A
llege
d th
at B
oard
had
acte
d un
law
fully
in fa
iling
tota
ke re
ason
able
step
s to
acqu
aint
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
itsel
f with
rele
vant
info
.
57.
Equa
l Opp
ortu
nitie
sC
omm
issi
on v
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
for T
rade
and
Indu
stry
[200
7] E
WH
C 4
83 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Empl
oym
ent,
disc
rimin
atio
n,tra
nspo
sitio
nof
EC
dire
ctiv
e
Euro
pean
Com
mun
ities
Act
197
2
Illeg
ality
(EC
)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.
No
orde
r mad
e
No
No
No
loss
58.
FH C
umm
ings
v W
eym
outh
and
Port
land
Bor
ough
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
601
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Proc
edur
al im
prop
riety
(nat
ural
just
ice
– op
portu
nity
to p
ut c
ase,
HR
A A
rt 6,
inad
equa
te re
ason
s)
Allo
wed
; loc
alpl
an re
view
parti
ally
quas
hed
No
(dev
elop
er)
Yes
(ref
usal
toal
low
clai
man
t’sex
pert
evid
ence
with
out l
ooki
ngat
it, w
hich
wen
t to
one
ofth
ede
term
inat
ive
issu
es e
ven
afte
r day
s of t
hehe
arin
g an
d an
adjo
urnm
ent)
No
loss
59.
Fing
le G
len
Junc
tion
Busi
ness
and
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n G
roup
v H
ighw
ays A
genc
y [2
007]
EWH
C 2
446
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Roa
d tra
ffic
Roa
d Tr
affic
Reg
ulat
ion
Act
198
4
Rev
iew
of a
genc
y’s d
ecis
ion
tom
ake
a te
mpo
rary
traf
ficre
gula
tion
orde
r. F,
a c
omm
unity
actio
n gr
oup,
alle
ged
brea
ch o
fpr
oced
ural
legi
timat
e ex
pect
atio
n(th
at th
ere
wou
ld b
e a
cons
ulta
tion
befo
re o
rder
mad
e).
Ord
er a
lso
disp
ropo
rtion
ate.
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
60.
Fran
cis v
Fir
st S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e [2
007]
EW
HC
274
9C
entra
lG
over
nmen
tD
epar
tmen
t
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
rypl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Proc
edur
al Im
prop
riety
Dis
mis
sed
61.
Free
dman
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for C
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent
Zafir
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for
Com
mun
ities
and
Loc
alG
over
nmen
t
[200
7] E
WH
C 8
88 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(rel
evan
t/irr
elev
ant
cons
ider
atio
ns)
Qua
shin
g or
ders
Allo
wed
.
Dec
isio
nsqu
ashe
d an
dre
mitt
ed.
Yes
No
No
loss
62.
Gal
e &
Oth
ers v
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
for C
omm
uniti
es a
ndLo
cal G
over
nmen
t & O
ther
s[2
007]
EW
HC
205
3 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent;
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
App
licat
ion
to q
uash
insp
ecto
r’s
deci
sion
to a
llow
an
appe
alag
ains
t the
refu
sal o
f pla
nnin
gpe
rmis
sion
by
the
Loca
lA
utho
rity.
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
N/A
63.
Geo
rge
Wim
pey
Ltd
vTe
wke
sbur
y Bo
roug
h C
ounc
il[2
007]
EW
HC
628
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
(1) A
pplic
atio
n to
qua
sh p
arts
of
a lo
cal p
lan
adop
ted
by th
e Lo
cal
Aut
horit
y on
gro
unds
.
(2) G
soug
ht p
erm
issi
on fo
r JR
–fo
r dec
lara
tory
relie
f con
cern
ing
one
part
of p
lan
and
conc
erni
ng
(1) Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
.TB
C’s
deci
sion
toin
clud
e 2
site
sto
whi
ch G
obje
cted
in it
sho
usin
g
Yes
No
Yes
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Loca
l Aut
horit
y’s r
efus
al o
f its
requ
est f
or a
2nd
loca
l pub
licen
quiry
in re
latio
n to
the
plan
.
Qua
shin
g or
der
allo
catio
nlo
cal p
lan
was
unre
ason
able
or ir
ratio
nal –
TBC
faile
d to
have
rega
rd to
clea
r nat
iona
lpo
licy
guid
ance
;al
tern
ativ
ely,
it fa
iled
togi
ve a
dequ
ate
reas
ons f
orre
ject
ing
C’s
obje
ctio
ns to
the
rele
vant
mod
ifica
tions
to th
e pl
an.
(2) D
ism
isse
d
64.
Gib
son
v Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for
Just
ice
[200
7] E
WH
C26
70A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Crim
inal
Just
ice,
rele
ase
on li
cenc
e
Crim
inal
Just
ice
Act
2003
Hab
eas C
orpu
s, Ill
egal
ityD
ism
isse
d
65.
Gid
vani
v L
ondo
n Re
ntAs
sess
men
t Pan
el [2
007]
EWH
C 2
525
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
Hou
sing
Not
spec
ified
.A
ppea
l aga
inst
am
ount
ass
esse
dby
Pan
el to
be
the
regi
ster
ed fa
irre
nt fo
r G’s
pre
mis
es. A
llege
d to
be a
n er
ror o
f law
in p
anel
’sde
cisi
on.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
66.
Gilb
ert E
ktor
v N
atio
nal
Publ
ic P
rose
cuto
r of H
olla
nd[2
007]
EW
HC
310
6 (A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Def
ectiv
e w
arra
ntD
ism
isse
dN
/AN
/AN
/A
67.
Gilb
oy v
Liv
erpo
ol C
ityC
ounc
il &
Ano
ther
[200
7]EW
HC
233
5 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity;
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Land
lord
and
Tena
ntD
emot
edTe
nanc
ies
(Rev
iew
of
Dec
isio
ns)
(Eng
land
)R
egul
atio
ns20
04
Rev
iew
of a
dec
isio
n of
revi
ewin
g of
ficer
of t
he L
ocal
Aut
horit
y to
uph
old
a pr
evio
usof
ficer
's de
cisi
on to
term
inat
eG
’s d
emot
ed te
nanc
y an
d to
obta
in p
osse
ssio
n of
her
hom
e.R
evie
w o
f dec
isio
n w
as c
arrie
dou
t pur
suan
t to
the
2004
Reg
s. G
argu
ed th
at th
e 20
04 R
eg w
ere
inco
mpa
tible
with
Art
6 of
ECH
R.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
N/A
N/A
68.
Goo
dyer
& G
omes
v G
ovt o
fTr
inid
ad a
nd T
obag
o [2
007]
EWH
C 2
012
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
App
eal a
gain
st d
ecis
ion
toex
tradi
te G
’s. A
llege
d th
atex
tradi
tion
wou
ld b
e (1
) unj
ust
and
oppr
essi
ve b
y re
ason
of
pass
age
of ti
me
and
(2)
inco
mpa
tible
with
Arti
cle
3 of
ECH
R
Allo
wed
.D
irect
ion
that
the
ques
tions
that
had
bee
nde
cide
d at
the
extra
ditio
nhe
arin
g be
deci
ded
agai
n.
Yes
No
N/A
69.
Gre
gory
v T
he L
aw S
ocie
ty[2
007]
EW
HC
172
4 (A
dmin
)N
DPB
Solic
itors
’di
scip
linar
ytri
buna
l
Solic
itors
Act
1974
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
70.
H &
Oth
ers v
Lon
don
Boro
ugh
of W
ands
wor
th &
Oth
ers [
2007
] EW
HC
108
2(A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Soci
al w
elfa
reC
hild
ren
Act
1989
3 ca
ses (
dist
inct
fact
s) ra
isin
gfo
llow
ing
lega
l iss
ue –
can
Loc
alA
utho
rity,
who
pro
vide
sac
com
mod
atio
n to
a c
hild
inne
ed, d
eter
min
e/sp
ecify
that
they
do so
und
er s1
7 of
198
9 A
ctw
hen
they
are
als
o un
der a
dut
yto
do
so u
nder
s20.
[Cla
ssifi
catio
n ha
s pra
ctic
alco
nseq
uenc
es in
sofa
r as i
t eff
ects
wha
t ser
vice
s the
Loc
alA
utho
rity
is o
blig
ed to
pro
vide
toch
ild fr
om th
e ag
e of
18.
]
Soug
ht d
ecla
ratio
n th
at g
uida
nce
publ
ishe
d by
DO
H w
aser
rone
ous.
Allo
wed
in 2
/3ca
ses.
Hel
d th
atLo
cal
Aut
horit
yco
uldn
’t so
spec
ify –
acco
mm
odat
ion
prov
ided
for
child
in n
eed
was
to b
ere
gard
ed a
sbe
ing
prov
ided
unde
r s20
and
not s
17 if
on
fact
s a d
uty
todo
so a
rose
unde
r s20
.G
uida
nce
not
unla
wfu
l –de
clar
atio
nre
fuse
d.
H’s
cas
e –
uphe
ld. L
ocal
Aut
horit
y ha
dac
ted
“unl
awfu
llyan
d bi
zarr
ely”
.
Yes
Yes
Yes
(H)
Yes
.
On
one
hand
, in
impl
emen
ting
thei
r pol
icy
Loca
l Aut
horit
yth
ough
t the
yw
ere
appl
ying
natio
nal
guid
ance
whi
chco
urt a
ccep
ted
was
mis
lead
ing.
Alth
ough
ther
eha
d be
en c
ase
law
on
gene
ral
natu
re o
f s17
and
s20,
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
2 no
tw
holly
cle
ar.
On
the
othe
rha
nd th
e Lo
cal
Aut
horit
y’s
polic
y w
as n
otat
all
inac
cord
ance
with
the
guid
ance
or
the
1989
Act
,an
d ef
fect
ivel
yre
quire
d a
child
who
was
Yes
Yes
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Qua
shed
deci
sion
by
Loca
lA
utho
rity
toac
com
mod
ate
H u
nder
s17.
Dec
lare
d th
atLo
cal
Aut
horit
ypr
ovid
edac
com
mod
atio
n to
H u
nder
s20.
X’s
cas
e –
decl
ared
that
acco
mm
odat
ion
prov
ided
toX
und
er s2
0an
d no
t s17
.
B’s
cas
e –
dism
isse
d.
uned
ucat
ed a
ndsp
oke
very
littl
eEn
glis
h to
mak
ea
choi
cebe
twee
n s1
7an
d s2
0, h
avin
gto
dig
est
com
plex
info
,as
sist
ed b
yin
terp
rete
rw
hose
lang
uage
was
not
exa
ctly
his o
wn.
Loc
alA
utho
rity
insi
sted
that
Cha
d m
ade
“an
info
rmed
deci
sion
” to
opt
for s
17 su
ppor
t.Pr
actic
alco
nseq
uenc
esof
cho
ice
sign
ifica
nt –
Cde
nied
any
of
the
post
-18
serv
ices
and
supp
ort t
ow
hich
he
wou
ldot
herw
ise
been
title
d.
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
(X) B
orde
rline
.Th
is L
ocal
Aut
horit
y di
dn’t
have
apr
otoc
ol/p
olic
ydo
cum
ent
(unl
ike
in th
eca
se a
bove
) and
didn
’t pr
esen
tth
e cl
aim
ant
with
ado
cum
ent
requ
iring
him
tom
ake
a ch
oice
.H
owev
er, a
s in
case
abo
ve, d
idco
nsis
tent
lyin
sist
that
Cw
as b
eing
prov
ided
with
supp
ort u
nder
s.17
even
thou
gh it
mad
eju
dgem
ents
whi
ch tr
igge
red
the
s.20
duty
.R
esul
t of
deci
sion
was
that
, as w
ell a
sbe
ing
deni
edpo
st-1
8
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
serv
ices
/sup
port
, he
was
disp
erse
d by
the
NA
SS to
anot
her a
rea
inac
cord
ance
with
polic
y.
(B) N
o
71.
Hal
l v C
hich
este
r Dis
tric
tC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
168
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Soci
al S
ecur
ityH
ousi
ngB
enef
it an
dC
ounc
il Ta
xB
enef
it(D
ecis
ions
and
App
eals
)R
egul
atio
ns20
01
Rev
iew
of L
ocal
Aut
horit
y’s
deci
sion
to re
fuse
to p
ay h
ousi
ngbe
nefit
to H
pen
ding
an
appe
alag
ains
t its
dec
isio
n to
term
inat
epa
ymen
t of h
er h
ousi
ng b
enef
it –
(1) r
efus
al n
ot la
wfu
l exe
rcis
e of
Loca
l Aut
horit
y’s d
iscr
etio
n (2
)br
each
of A
rt 3,
6 a
nd 7
of
ECH
R.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
72.
Har
vey
v Ju
dici
al A
utho
rity
of
Port
ugal
- Tr
ibun
al J
udic
ial
de A
lbuf
eira
[200
7] E
WH
C32
82 (A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Term
s of w
arra
ntD
ism
isse
dN
/AN
/AN
/A
73.
Has
hmi v
Gov
ernm
ent o
f the
Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f Am
eric
a[2
007]
EW
HC
564
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
(inc
ludi
ng H
RA
art
8)(a
ppea
l)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
74.
Hay
nes v
Cou
rt o
fM
agis
trat
es, M
alta
[200
7]EW
HC
265
1 (A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
App
eal a
gain
st d
ecis
ion
ofW
estm
inst
er M
agis
trate
s Cou
rtto
ord
er H
’s e
xtra
ditio
n.C
halle
nged
on
3 gr
ound
s (1)
valid
ity o
f arr
est w
arra
nt (2
)w
heth
er o
ffenc
e an
ext
radi
tion
offe
nce
(3) r
eque
st fo
rex
tradi
tion
abus
e of
pro
cess
Allo
wed
.Y
esN
oN
/A
75.
Hea
th &
Ham
pste
ad S
ocie
ty v
Lond
on B
orou
gh o
f Cam
den
[200
7] E
WH
C 9
77 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Not
spec
ified
but m
ust b
eth
e To
wn
and
Cou
ntry
Plan
ning
Act
1990
Rev
iew
of L
ocal
Aut
horit
y’s
deci
sion
to g
rant
pla
nnin
gpe
rmis
sion
to in
tere
sted
par
ties
in re
spec
t of p
rope
rty si
tuat
ed o
nM
etro
polit
an O
pen
Land
.Q
uash
ing
orde
r sou
ght
Allo
wed
Yes
No
N/A
76.
Her
tford
shir
e C
ount
y C
ounc
ilv
Nat
iona
l Gri
d G
as L
td[2
007]
EW
HC
253
5 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity,
Dis
trict
Judg
e
Roa
ds.
New
Roa
dsan
d St
reet
Wor
ks A
ct19
91
App
eal.
Ille
galit
y
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
77.
Hig
hton
v H
MYO
I Lan
cast
erFa
rms
& A
noth
er [2
007]
EWH
C 1
085
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Sent
enci
ngC
rimin
alJu
stic
e A
ct20
03
Rev
iew
of p
rison
er g
over
nor’
s(1
) sen
tenc
e ca
lcul
atio
n de
cisi
on,
and
(2) r
efus
al to
allo
w C
spec
ial
rem
issi
on h
ad b
een
irrat
iona
l.
Allo
wed
Yes
No
N/A
78.
Hila
li v
Gov
erno
r of
Whi
tem
oor P
riso
n [2
007]
EWH
C 9
39 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Extra
ditio
nH
abea
sC
orpu
s Act
App
licat
ion
for w
rit o
f hab
eas
corp
us (s
tatu
tory
ext
radi
tion
proc
ess h
ad c
ome
to a
n en
d).
Alle
ged
that
new
evi
denc
eem
erge
d w
hich
und
erm
ined
the
Allo
wed
but
deci
sion
over
turn
ed b
yH
ouse
of
Lord
s [20
08]
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
basi
s on
whi
ch w
arra
nt h
ad b
een
enfo
rced
, ren
derin
g H
’sde
tent
ion
unla
wfu
l.
UK
HL
3.
79.
Hill
v B
edfo
rdsh
ire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
435
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Educ
atio
n,Sp
ecia
l Nee
dsA
sses
smen
t.C
ontin
ued
Fund
ing
Loca
lG
over
nmen
tA
ct 2
000,
Educ
atio
nA
ct 1
996
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Yes
, the
Loc
alA
utho
rity
had
mad
e a
serio
user
ror a
s to
whe
ther
they
coul
d fu
nd a
pers
on w
ithsp
ecia
l nee
dsin
col
lege
toth
e ag
e of
19,
whi
ch se
emed
to b
reac
h an
earli
erag
reem
ent.
This
incl
uded
a se
rious
err
orre
latin
g to
am
ater
ial f
act
such
as t
ow
heth
er th
eir
had
been
appl
icat
ions
for a
ltern
ativ
em
eans
of
fund
ing
and
wha
t wer
e th
edu
ties o
f a
Yes
Yes
,da
mag
esbe
ing
the
cost
of
scho
olin
gth
at h
asbe
en m
etby
the
clai
man
t’spa
rent
s
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Loca
lA
utho
rity.
This
tied
with
the
serio
usne
ssof
the
case
–ed
ucat
ion
of a
child
per
son
with
a sp
ecia
lne
eds
certi
ficat
e.
80.
Hill
ingd
on L
ondo
n Bo
roug
hC
ounc
il v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
tefo
r Edu
catio
n an
d Sk
ills
[200
7] E
WH
C 5
14 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Chi
ldre
n in
care
; loc
alau
thor
itysp
endi
ng
Loca
lG
over
nmen
tA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
(leg
itim
ate
expe
ctat
ion;
polic
y ex
cept
ion)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
81.
Hol
low
ay v
Oxf
ord
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
& O
ther
s [20
07]
EWH
C 7
76 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Men
tal H
ealth
Men
tal
Hea
lth A
ct19
83
Rev
iew
of (
1) L
ocal
Aut
horit
y’s
deci
sion
to m
ake
a w
ithou
tno
tice
appl
icat
ion
to d
ispl
ace
H’s
mot
her a
s his
nea
rest
rela
tive
for
the
purp
oses
of t
he 1
983
Act
and
(2) t
he C
ourt’
s dec
isio
n to
gra
ntth
e in
terim
ord
er. B
reac
h of
prin
cipl
es o
f nat
ural
just
ice
and
Art
6 an
d 8
of th
e EC
HR
alle
ged.
Mea
nt th
at c
ourt
acte
d w
ithou
tju
risdi
ctio
n (3
) cla
im a
gain
st th
eH
ealth
Tru
st fo
r det
aini
ng H
unla
wfu
lly.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
82.
Ian
Cha
rlto
n-M
erry
wea
ther
(Lis
ting
Offi
cer)
v (1
) TD
Hun
t, (2
) GW
Bra
dley
, (3)
Robe
rt G
ibso
n, (4
) Jac
kC
rom
pton
[200
7] E
WH
C 3
190
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
Cou
ncil
tax
Loca
lG
over
nmen
tFi
nanc
e A
ct19
88
Cou
ncil
Tax
(Alte
ratio
n of
List
s and
App
eals
)R
egul
atio
ns19
93
Erro
r in
law
– st
atut
ory
inte
rpre
tatio
nD
ism
isse
dN
/AN
/AN
/A
83.
Jam
es D
owse
tt v
Cri
min
alC
ases
Rev
iew
Com
mis
sion
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
923
(Adm
in)
ND
PBD
ecis
ion
ofC
CR
C to
refe
rca
se to
CA
Crim
inal
App
eal A
ct19
95
Illeg
ality
(HR
A re
late
d)
Not
stat
ed
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
84.
Jam
es v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rJu
stic
e [2
007]
EW
HC
202
7(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Crim
e an
dPe
nolo
gyN
ot sp
ecifi
ed–
but
Crim
inal
Just
ice
Act
2003
, Crim
eSe
nten
ces
Act
199
7,Po
wer
s of
Crim
inal
Rev
iew
of S
S’s f
ailu
re to
pro
vide
J, pr
ison
er se
rvin
g in
dete
rmin
ate
sent
ence
s for
pub
lic p
rote
ctio
n,w
ith a
cces
s to
treat
men
t cou
rses
(nee
ded
acce
ss to
cou
rses
inor
der t
o m
ake
mea
ning
ful
subm
issi
ons t
o Pa
role
Boa
rdde
mon
stra
ting
a re
duct
ion
in ri
skpo
sed)
. Arg
ued
that
(1) S
S ac
ted
Allo
wed
.R
elea
se o
f Jor
dere
d bu
tst
ayed
pend
ing
appe
al to
Cou
rt of
App
eal.
SS’s
appe
al
Yes
Yes
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Cou
rts(S
ente
ncin
g)A
ct 2
000
unla
wfu
lly in
faili
ng to
pro
vide
cour
ses (
2) c
ontin
ued
impr
ison
men
t afte
r exp
iry o
fta
riff w
as u
nlaw
ful (
3) b
reac
h of
Art
5(4)
of E
CH
R.
allo
wed
in p
art
in [2
007]
EWC
A C
iv30
. SS
succ
eede
d in
appe
alin
ggr
ound
(2) b
utH
igh
Cou
rt’s
deci
sion
conc
erni
ng (1
)up
held
.
85.
Jani
k v
Stan
dard
s Boa
rd fo
rEn
glan
d [2
007]
EW
HC
835
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
Cou
ncill
ors’
prof
essi
onal
stan
dard
s
Loca
lG
over
nmen
tA
ct 2
000
Illeg
ality
, pro
cedu
ral i
mpr
oprie
ty(b
ias,
fairn
ess)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
86.
John
son
v Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for C
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
1839
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(err
or o
f law
)
Qua
shin
g
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
87.
Jone
s v F
irst
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
28(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Rev
iew
of S
S’s d
ecis
ion
tore
fuse
pla
nnin
g pe
rmis
sion
and
dism
iss a
ppea
ls. A
llege
d th
atba
lanc
e st
ruck
in in
spec
tor’
sfin
al c
oncl
usio
n irr
atio
nal.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
88.
K v
Spe
cial
Edu
catio
nal N
eeds
and
Dis
abili
ty T
ribu
nal &
Anot
her [
2007
] EW
HC
790
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
;Lo
cal
Aut
horit
y
Educ
atio
nEd
ucat
ion
Act
199
6A
ppea
l aga
inst
a d
ecis
ion
of th
eTr
ibun
al u
phol
ding
a n
amed
non-
resi
dent
ial s
choo
l in
ast
atem
ent o
f spe
cial
edu
catio
nal
need
s pre
pare
d by
the
Loca
lA
utho
rity
in re
spec
t of h
er so
n.A
llege
d th
at T
ribun
al’s
reas
ons
for i
ts d
ecis
ion
wer
e in
adeq
uate
and
irrat
iona
l.
Allo
wed
Yes
No
N/A
89.
Ken
sing
ton
Inte
rnat
iona
lLi
mite
d &
Ano
ther
v R
epub
licof
the
Con
go [2
006]
EW
HC
1712
(Com
m)
Dis
trict
Judg
eC
omm
erci
allit
igat
ion
Sect
ion
37Su
prem
eC
ourt
Act
1981
; sec
tion
25 o
f the
Juris
dict
ion
and
Judg
men
tsA
ct 1
982
Illeg
ality
Setti
ng a
side
Dis
mis
sed,
but
orde
r var
ied
Yes
No
Yes
90.
Kin
g's C
ross
Rai
lway
Lan
dsG
roup
v L
ondo
n Bo
roug
h of
Cam
den
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
515
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Not
spec
ified
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
91.
Kni
ght v
HM
Com
ptro
ller-
Gen
eral
of P
aten
ts, T
rade
Mar
ks &
Des
igns
[200
7]EW
HC
226
4 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBIn
telle
ctua
lPr
oper
tyPa
tent
Coo
pera
tion
Trea
ty 1
970
Rev
iew
of C
ompt
rolle
rs d
ecis
ion
that
K’s
app
licat
ion
unde
r the
Trea
ty h
ad n
ot c
onta
ined
a c
laim
or c
laim
s. A
llege
d th
atC
ompt
rolle
r had
err
ed in
law
.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
92.
Krz
yzow
ski v
Cir
cuit
Cou
rt in
Gliw
ice
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
715
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
93.
La T
orre
v T
he R
epub
lic o
fIta
ly [2
007]
EW
HC
137
0(A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
(inc
ludi
ng H
RA
)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
94.
Law
er v
Res
toer
mel
Bor
ough
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
299
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Hou
sing
Hou
sing
Act
1996
Rev
iew
of L
ocal
Aut
horit
y’s
deci
sion
to re
fuse
to c
ontin
ue to
supp
ly L
with
tem
pora
ryac
com
mod
atio
n. A
man
dato
ryin
junc
tion
had
been
gra
nted
requ
iring
the
Loca
l Aut
horit
y to
secu
re su
itabl
e ac
com
mod
atio
nfo
r her
self
and
her c
hild
ren.
Loca
l Aut
horit
y ar
gued
that
inju
nctio
n sh
ould
be
disc
harg
ed.
Dis
mis
sed.
Man
dato
ryin
junc
tion
agai
nst L
ocal
Aut
horit
ydi
scha
rged
.
Yes
No
N/A
95.
Lisa
Sm
ith, M
ary
Elle
n Re
illy,
Julia
Rei
lly v
The
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
for T
rade
and
Indu
stry
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
013
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
/co
mpu
lsor
yac
quis
ition
Reg
iona
lD
evel
opm
ent
Age
ncie
s Act
1998
;A
cqui
sitio
nof
Lan
d A
ct19
81
Illeg
ality
, hum
an ri
ghts
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
Loss
of
secu
rity
ofac
com
mod
atio
n fo
r an
inte
rimpe
riod
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
96.
Looe
Fue
ls L
td v
Loo
eH
arbo
ur C
omm
issi
oner
s[2
007]
EW
HC
114
1 (A
dmin
)
Trib
unal
Ship
ping
Publ
ic A
ct“f
orM
aint
aini
ngan
dIm
prov
ing
the
Har
bour
of L
ooe,
inth
e C
ount
y of
Cor
nwal
l, an
dfo
r tak
ing
dow
n th
epr
esen
tB
ridge
betw
een
East
and
Wes
tLo
oe a
cros
sth
e sa
idH
arbo
ur, a
ndEr
ectin
g a
New
Brid
gein
stea
dth
ereo
f” 1
848
Rev
iew
of C
omm
issi
oner
sde
cisi
on th
at th
ey (i
e th
eC
omm
issi
oner
s) c
ould
ope
rate
afu
el ta
nk fa
cilit
y at
Loo
eH
arbo
ur. L
F cl
aim
ed th
atC
omm
issi
oner
s do
not h
ave
pow
er to
buy
and
sell
fuel
for
vess
els i
n th
e ha
rbou
r.
Allo
wed
;de
clar
atio
ngr
ante
d in
favo
ur o
f LF.
Yes
No
N/A
97.
Lope
tas v
Min
iste
r of J
ustic
efo
r Lith
uani
a [2
007]
EW
HC
2407
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
(abu
se o
f pro
cess
)
Qua
shin
g
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
98.
Mai
n v
Min
iste
r for
Leg
al A
id&
Oth
ers [
2007
] EW
HC
742
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Lega
l aid
Acc
ess t
oJu
stic
e A
ctR
evie
w o
f Min
iste
r’s d
ecis
ion
tore
fuse
M’s
app
licat
ion
for
fund
ing
for l
egal
fund
ing
at a
Allo
wed
–gr
ound
s (2)
and
(3)
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
(Adm
in)
Dep
artm
ent
1999
Cor
oner
s Inq
uest
follo
win
g a
fata
l rai
lway
acc
iden
t. M
inis
ter
reje
cted
LSC
’s re
com
men
datio
nth
at e
xcep
tiona
l fun
ding
oug
ht to
be g
rant
ed b
ecau
se o
f the
wid
erpu
blic
inte
rest
. Alle
ged
that
(1)
Min
iste
r err
ed in
subs
titut
ing
her
view
for t
hat o
f LSC
’sco
ncer
ning
pub
lic in
tere
st (2
)M
inis
ter’
s dec
isio
n th
at th
ere
was
no
publ
ic in
tere
st w
asirr
atio
nal (
3) re
pres
enta
tion
was
likel
y to
be
nece
ssar
y fo
r an
effe
ctiv
e A
rt 2
inve
stig
atio
n by
Cor
oner
.
deci
ded
in M
’sfa
vour
.R
efus
al o
fle
gal a
idqu
ashe
d.H
owev
erM
inis
ter’
sap
peal
allo
wed
in[2
007]
EW
CA
Civ
114
7.
99.
Mar
tin v
Leg
al S
ervi
ces
Com
mis
sion
[200
7] E
WH
C17
86 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBLe
gal a
idLe
gal A
idA
ct 1
988
Rev
iew
of F
undi
ng R
evie
wC
omm
ittee
’s d
ecis
ion
upho
ldin
gdi
scha
rge
of M
’s le
gal a
idce
rtific
ate.
Alle
ged
(1) b
reac
h of
legi
timat
e ex
pect
atio
n (2
) bre
ach
of A
rt 6
of E
CH
R (3
) Com
mitt
eeha
d er
red
in la
w. A
pplie
d te
stin
corr
ectly
. Had
igno
red
cost
sal
read
y in
curr
ed b
y M
.
Allo
wed
on
basi
s of
grou
nd (3
).D
ecis
ion
quas
hed.
Mat
ter
rem
itted
bac
kfo
r fre
shco
nsid
erat
ion.
Yes
No
No
100.
M
artin
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for
the
Min
istr
y of
Jus
tice
[200
7]EW
HC
179
7 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Pris
ons
Crim
inal
Just
ice
Act
1991
Dec
lara
tion;
man
dato
ry o
rder
;da
mag
esA
llow
ed.
Dec
lara
tion
and
man
dato
ryor
der g
rant
ed.
Dam
ages
issu
e
Yes
No
Yes
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
refe
rred
toQ
BD
101.
M
cCab
e &
Oth
ers v
Sec
reta
ryof
Sta
te fo
r Com
mun
ities
and
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent &
Ano
ther
[200
7] E
WH
C 9
59 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Leas
ehol
d,R
efor
m,
Hou
sing
and
Urb
anD
evel
opm
ent
Act
199
3
Cha
lleng
e to
the
valid
ity o
f aco
mpu
lsor
y pu
rcha
se o
rder
mad
eon
the
grou
nds t
hat t
he b
uild
ings
wer
e va
cant
, unu
sed
orin
effe
ctiv
ely
used
.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
102.
M
cDow
er v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t[2
007]
EW
HC
272
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
and
asyl
umN
atio
nalit
y,Im
mig
ratio
nan
d A
sylu
mA
ct 2
002
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
103.
M
cKin
non
v U
SA &
Oth
ers
[200
7] E
WH
C 7
62 (A
dmin
)C
entra
lG
over
nmen
tD
epar
tmen
t
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Act
200
3A
ppea
l aga
inst
dec
isio
n to
extra
dite
M to
USA
. Arg
ued
that
(1) e
xtra
ditio
n sh
ould
be
barr
edun
der t
he 2
003
Act
by
reas
on o
fde
lay
(2) i
t wou
ld b
ein
com
patib
le w
ith h
is h
uman
right
s (3)
it w
ould
be
an a
buse
of
proc
ess.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
104.
M
ehm
et v
Lon
don
Prob
atio
nBo
ard
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
223
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Crim
e an
dPe
nolo
gyN
ot sp
ecifi
edR
evie
w o
f pro
batio
n bo
ard’
sde
cisi
on to
refu
se M
’s re
ques
t to
trave
l abr
oad
whi
lst o
n lic
ense
.C
halle
nged
on
3 gr
ound
s (1)
proc
edur
al u
nfai
rnes
s (2)
deci
sion
irra
tiona
l (3)
bre
ach
of
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
ifst
atut
ory
basi
sex
ists
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Art
8 of
EC
HR
105.
M
iles v
Nat
iona
l Ass
embl
y fo
rW
ales
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
0(A
dmin
)
Dev
olve
dA
dmin
istra
tion
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Rev
iew
of N
AW
’s d
ecis
ion
todi
smis
s M’s
app
eal a
gain
stde
cisi
on o
f Loc
al A
utho
rity
tore
fuse
a c
ertif
icat
e fo
r law
ful
deve
lopm
ent.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
106.
M
ilnya
li v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
tefo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t[2
007]
EW
HC
241
1 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
and
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esM
soug
ht a
dec
lara
tion
that
he
had
been
unl
awfu
lly d
etai
ned
bySS
pen
ding
dep
orta
tion.
Cla
imed
dam
ages
.
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
N/A
107.
M
itche
ll v
Hig
h C
ourt
of
Boul
ogne
Sur
Mer
[200
7]EW
HC
200
6 (A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Cou
rtEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g (a
ppea
l)
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
108.
M
ontv
ydas
v D
istr
ict C
ourt
of
Kla
ffado
rys [
2007
] EW
HC
1030
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
App
eal a
gain
st a
n ex
tradi
tion
orde
r to
Lith
uani
a. W
asn’
t giv
enop
portu
nity
to a
ttend
lice
nse
hear
ing
in L
ithua
nia.
Vio
latio
nof
def
ence
righ
ts u
nder
Lith
uani
an la
w
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
109.
M
oody
v G
ener
al M
edic
alC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
246
5(A
dmin
)
ND
PBPr
ofes
sion
alre
gula
tion
Med
ical
Act
1983
App
eal a
gain
st P
rofe
ssio
nal
Con
duct
Com
mitt
ee th
at M
had
been
gui
lty o
f pro
fess
iona
lin
com
pete
nce
and
that
his
nam
esh
ould
be
rem
oved
from
the
regi
ster
. Bas
ed o
n 2
grou
nds (
1)co
mm
ittee
faile
d to
pro
perly
take
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
acco
unt e
vide
nce
befo
re it
(2)
alle
gatio
ns d
idn’
t jus
tify
findi
ngof
gen
eral
inco
mpe
tenc
e an
dsa
nctio
n ex
cess
ive
and
unne
cess
ary
110.
M
R D
ean
& S
ons (
Edgw
are)
Ltd
& A
noth
er v
Wes
t End
Gre
en (P
rope
rtie
s) L
td &
Anot
her [
2007
] EW
HC
1(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
(1) S
S ha
d er
red
in d
ecid
ing
togr
ant p
lann
ing
perm
issi
on fo
r ade
velo
pmen
t des
pite
the
pres
ence
of a
djoi
ning
pro
perty
.In
adeq
uate
reas
ons g
iven
.
(2) S
S ha
d al
som
isin
terp
rete
d/m
isap
plie
d Lo
cal
Aut
horit
y’s U
rban
Dev
elop
men
tPl
an a
nd h
ad fa
iled
to h
ave
rega
rd to
a m
ater
ial
cons
ider
atio
n.
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
inpa
rt.
(1)A
pplic
atio
nco
ncer
ning
adjo
inin
gpr
oper
ty is
sue
dism
isse
d.
(2) H
eld
that
SS h
ad m
isse
dop
portu
nity
toco
nsid
eral
tern
ativ
ede
sign
s and
had
not
adeq
uate
lyex
plai
ned
why
disa
dvan
tage
sof
pro
pose
dbu
ildin
gs h
adto
be
acce
pted
.Th
is a
spec
tw
as a
ppea
led.
App
eal
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
allo
wed
in[2
007]
EW
CA
Civ
108
3.
111.
M
ucel
li v
Alba
nia
[200
7]EW
HC
263
2 (A
dmin
)D
istri
ctJu
dge
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Act
200
3Ill
egal
ityD
ism
isse
d
112.
N
asse
ri v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t[2
007]
EW
HC
154
8 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Asy
lum
and
Imm
igra
tion
(Tre
atm
ent o
fC
laim
ants
,et
c.) A
ct20
04
Illeg
ality
(HR
A)
Dec
lara
tion
(of i
ncom
patib
ility
unde
r s 4
HR
A)
Allo
wed
;de
clar
atio
n of
inco
mpa
tibili
ty
unde
r s 4
HR
A
Yes
No
No
loss
113.
N
iazi
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for
the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t and
Anot
her [
2007
] EW
HC
149
5(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Com
pens
atio
nof
vic
tims o
fm
isca
rria
ges
of ju
stic
e
N/A
Dec
isio
n to
abo
lish
disc
retio
nary
sche
me:
Proc
edur
al fa
irnes
s (le
gitim
ate
expe
ctat
ion
to c
onsu
ltatio
n, d
uty
to g
ive
reas
ons)
; Ille
galit
y(ir
rele
vant
con
side
ratio
ns).
Dec
isio
n to
fix
low
er a
war
ds:
irrat
iona
lity:
Proc
edur
al fa
irnes
s (du
ty to
act
fairl
y); B
reac
h of
legi
timat
eex
pect
atio
n; H
RA
Art
6.
Qua
shin
g or
ders
Dis
mis
sed
No
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
114.
N
iesc
ier v
Cir
cuit
Cou
rt if
Legn
ica
III C
rim
inal
Dep
artm
ent,
Pola
nd [2
007]
EWH
C 2
367
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
App
eal a
gain
st d
ecis
ion
toex
tradi
te. R
ehea
ring
follo
win
gad
jour
nmen
t to
obta
in fu
rther
info
rmat
ion
from
Pol
ish
cour
t.
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
N/A
115.
N
isbe
t v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for
the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t and
Ors
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
768
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Act
200
3Ill
egal
ity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
116.
N
orri
s v U
nite
d St
ates
of
Amer
ica,
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rth
e H
ome
Dep
artm
ent &
Oth
ers [
2007
] EW
HC
71
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Act
200
3A
ppea
l aga
inst
an
orde
r sen
ding
N’s
cas
e to
SS
to c
onsi
der a
requ
est f
or e
xtra
ditio
n by
the
US,
and
agai
nst t
he d
ecis
ion
toex
tradi
te h
im
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
117.
O
v L
ondo
n Bo
roug
h of
Lew
isha
m &
Ano
ther
[200
7]EW
HC
213
0 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lau
thor
ity;
Trib
unal
Educ
atio
n A
ct19
96;
Trib
unal
s and
Inqu
iries
Act
1992
Loca
lau
thor
ityde
cisi
onab
out
amen
dmen
tto
stat
emen
tof
spec
ial
educ
atio
nal
need
s
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
118.
O
’Cal
lagh
an v
Cha
rity
Com
mis
sion
for E
ngla
nd a
ndW
ales
& O
ther
s [20
07]
EWH
C 2
491
(Adm
in)
ND
PBC
harit
ies
No
stat
ute.
Min
iste
rial
prom
ise
ofco
nsul
tatio
n(g
oing
beyo
nd
Rev
iew
of a
n or
der m
ade
byC
omm
issi
on a
utho
risin
g tru
stee
sof
Ale
xand
ra P
ark
and
Pala
ce to
gran
t a le
ase
to d
evel
oper
s.A
llege
d th
at o
rder
unl
awfu
l as
min
iste
rial p
rom
ise
conc
erni
ng
Dis
mis
sed.
Ord
er q
uash
edan
dde
clar
atio
nm
ade.
No
Yes
Und
erta
king
was
am
inis
teria
l one
.
No
loss
.co
ncer
ning
caus
atio
nno
te th
atth
e co
urt
reje
cted
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
stat
utor
yre
quire
men
ts)
cons
ulta
tion
had
not b
een
hono
ured
. Sou
ght d
ecla
ratio
nth
at o
rder
unl
awfu
l and
aQ
uash
ing
orde
r. C
C a
rgue
d th
atno
relie
f sho
uld
be g
rant
ed a
s Oha
d be
en a
ble
to m
ake
deta
iled
reps
des
pite
flaw
ed c
onsu
ltatio
n.
Com
mis
sion
inte
rpre
ted
unde
rtaki
ng in
very
lim
ited,
lega
listic
way
–pu
blis
hed
draf
tor
der b
ut n
otle
ase
iesu
bsta
nce
ofor
der.
Neg
ated
com
plet
ely
the
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
the
cons
ulta
tion.
Ther
e w
as n
ofu
rther
cons
ider
atio
n of
mat
ter e
ven
afte
r iss
uera
ised
by
No
ofco
nsul
tees
and
iden
tifie
d by
Com
mis
sion
’sof
ficer
s. C
ourt
foun
d th
atco
nsul
tatio
npr
oces
s was
“ver
y se
rious
lyfla
wed
” –
“thi
sis
not
a c
ase
ofa
cons
ulta
tion
D’s
argu
men
tth
at th
ere
wou
ld b
eno
cha
nce
of a
diffe
rent
deci
sion
bein
gre
ache
dev
en if
the
cons
ulta
tion
proc
ess
was
re-
open
ed.
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
exer
cise
whe
reco
nsul
tees
hav
ebe
en g
iven
som
e bu
tin
adeq
uate
info
rmat
ion.
This
is a
cons
ulta
tion
exer
cise
whe
resi
mpl
ypu
blis
hing
the
draf
t not
ice,
with
virt
ually
noth
ing
mor
e,ga
ve c
onsu
ltees
virtu
ally
no
info
rmat
ion
abou
t wha
t it
was
that
cons
ent w
asbe
ing
soug
htfo
r…al
l the
criti
cal
info
rmat
ion
was
with
held
.”
119.
O
dele
v L
ondo
n Bo
roug
h of
Hac
kney
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
522
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Roa
d tra
ffic
Not
spec
ified
but t
here
is a
stat
utor
yba
sis.
Rev
iew
of c
ontin
uing
failu
re o
fLo
cal A
utho
rity
to p
rovi
de O
with
cop
ies o
f a p
enal
ty c
harg
eno
tice
in re
spec
t of h
is c
ar.
Cha
rge
even
tual
ly c
ance
lled
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
how
ever
.
120.
O
gilv
y v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
rth
e H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
230
1 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
and
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esR
evie
w o
f SS’
s dec
isio
n to
susp
end
O’s
inde
finite
leav
e to
rem
ain
pend
ing
furth
er p
olic
een
quire
s rel
atin
g to
alle
ged
crim
inal
act
ivity
and
seiz
ed h
istra
vel d
ocs.
Arg
ued
that
SS
mis
dire
cted
him
self
in la
w.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
121.
O
noto
ta v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t[2
007]
EW
HC
797
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esR
evie
w o
f dec
isio
n of
ent
rycl
eara
nce
offic
er in
Lag
os to
refu
se O
ent
ry c
lear
ance
to U
Kpe
ndin
g re
ceip
t of w
ork
perm
it.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
122.
O
rang
e Pe
rson
alC
omm
unic
atio
ns S
ervi
ces v
Birm
ingh
am C
ity C
ounc
il[2
007]
EW
HC
760
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct20
00
Rev
iew
of L
ocal
Aut
horit
y’s
deci
sion
to g
rant
pla
nnin
gpe
rmis
sion
for t
he c
hang
e of
use
of la
nd –
cha
lleng
e ba
sed
on 2
grou
nds:
(1) m
isdi
rect
ion
by th
epl
anni
ng o
ffic
er to
the
plan
ning
com
mitt
ee c
onst
itute
d m
ater
ial
erro
r of f
act (
2) o
ffice
r’s a
dvic
eto
the
com
mitt
ee w
as ir
ratio
nal.
Allo
wed
on
both
gro
unds
;de
cisi
onqu
ashe
d. N
ote
that
the
defe
ndan
tar
gued
in th
eca
se th
at e
ven
if bo
thgr
ound
ssu
cces
sful
, the
cour
t exe
rcis
eits
dis
cret
ion
not t
o gr
ant
the
rem
edy
soug
ht
Yes
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
(Qua
shin
gor
der)
bec
ause
ther
e w
as n
ore
al p
ossi
bilit
yth
at th
eco
mm
ittee
wou
ld h
ave
take
n a
diffe
rent
deci
sion
had
eith
er o
r bot
hof
the
erro
rsno
t occ
urre
d.C
ourt
reje
cted
this
subm
issi
onan
d gr
ante
dre
lief
123.
O
sunt
a v
The
Publ
icPr
osec
utor
's O
ffice
InD
usse
ldor
f [20
07] E
WH
C15
62 (A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
124.
O
xfor
d C
ity C
ounc
il v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
rC
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
769
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
App
licat
ion
by L
ocal
Aut
horit
yto
qua
sh d
ecis
ion
of p
lann
ing
insp
ecto
r gra
nted
pla
nnin
gpe
rmis
sion
on
an a
ppea
l aga
inst
an e
nfor
cem
ent n
otic
e th
at h
ad
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
been
serv
ed b
y th
e Lo
cal
Aut
horit
y on
the
resp
onde
ntco
mpa
ny. A
llege
d th
at th
ein
spec
tor h
ad e
rred
by
taki
ngac
coun
t of i
rrel
evan
t fac
tors
and
depa
rting
from
the
first
pla
nnin
gin
spec
tor’
s dec
isio
n w
ithou
tgi
ving
inte
lligi
ble
reas
ons.
Qua
shin
g or
der
125.
P
v Lo
ndon
Bor
ough
of
Hac
kney
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
365
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Spec
ial
educ
atio
nal
need
s
Chi
ldre
n A
cts
1989
and
2004
Illeg
ality
(fet
terin
g di
scre
tion)
,irr
atio
nalit
yD
ism
isse
dY
esN
oN
o lo
ss
126.
Pa
ge v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rJu
stic
e [2
007]
EW
HC
202
6(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Crim
e an
dPe
nolo
gyN
o –
prer
ogat
ive
pow
er
Rev
iew
of S
S’s d
ecis
ion
not t
oex
erci
se p
rero
gativ
e of
mer
cy in
his f
avou
r to
gran
t ear
ly re
leas
e
Allo
wed
.D
ecla
ratio
ngr
ante
d th
atm
atte
r sho
uld
be reco
nsid
ered
.
No
No
N/A
127.
Pa
ul a
nd O
ther
s v D
eput
yC
oron
er o
f the
Que
en’s
Hou
seho
ld a
nd A
nor [
2007
]EW
HC
408
(Adm
in)
Cor
oner
Cha
lleng
e to
prel
imin
ary
deci
sion
s in
inqu
ests
Cor
oner
s Act
1988
Illeg
ality
(jur
isdi
ctio
n,re
leva
nt/ir
rele
vant
cons
ider
atio
ns);
proc
edur
alim
prop
riety
(ind
epen
denc
e, b
ias)
Allo
wed
inpa
rt(ju
risdi
ctio
n,irr
elev
ant
cons
ider
atio
ns
Yes
No
No
Loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Qua
shin
g or
ders
) Qua
shin
gor
ders
Parti
ally
dism
isse
d(b
ias)
128.
Pi
leck
i v C
ircu
it C
ourt
of
Legn
ica
2007
] EW
HC
208
0(A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n,in
valid
ity)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
129.
Pi
otro
wsk
i v T
he D
istr
ict
Cou
rt o
f Slu
psk,
Pol
and
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
982
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
130.
Po
wel
l & O
ther
s v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for C
omm
uniti
es a
ndLo
cal G
over
nmen
t & A
noth
er[2
007]
EW
HC
205
1 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent;
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Hou
sing
Act
1985
App
licat
ion
to q
uash
aco
mpu
lsor
y pu
rcha
se o
rder
mad
ein
resp
ect o
f a n
umbe
r of h
omes
for t
he p
urpo
ses o
f reg
ener
atin
gth
e ar
ea. A
llege
d th
at d
ecis
ion
was
irra
tiona
l and
bre
ach
of A
rt6
and
8 of
the
ECH
R.
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
N/A
131.
Pr
us v
Dis
tric
t Cou
rt o
fBi
alys
tok
[200
7] E
WH
C 9
34(A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
(app
eal)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
132.
R
("B"
who
act
s by
his
litig
atio
n fr
iend
PW
) vC
rim
inal
Inju
ries
Com
pens
atio
n Ap
peal
s Pan
el[2
007]
EW
HC
180
(Adm
in)
ND
PBC
rimin
alin
jurie
sco
mpe
nsat
ion;
burd
en o
fpr
oof f
orap
peal
s
1990
Crim
inal
Inju
ries
Com
pens
atio
n Sc
hem
e
Illeg
ality
, irr
atio
nalit
y, ir
rele
vant
cons
ider
atio
ns
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;D
ecis
ion
quas
hed;
cas
ere
mitt
ed
No
stat
ute
No
(law
uncl
ear,
deci
sion
mad
ein
bes
t int
eres
tsof
cla
iman
t)
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
133.
R
(A) v
B (C
ounc
il) [2
007]
EWH
C 1
529
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Loca
lgo
vern
men
tco
ntra
cts
N/A
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed.
No
No
No
134.
R
(A) v
Liv
erpo
ol C
ity C
ounc
il[2
007]
EW
HC
147
7 (A
dmin
)Lo
cal
Aut
horit
yC
are
ofim
mig
rant
child
ren.
Det
erm
inat
ion
by L
ocal
Aut
horit
y of
age
ofcl
aim
ant.
Chi
ldre
n A
ct19
89(d
ecis
ion
mad
e un
der
impl
ied
pow
er)
Illeg
ality
(rel
evan
t/irr
elev
ant
cons
ider
atio
ns),
proc
edur
alim
prop
riety
(opp
ortu
nity
to se
ean
d co
mm
ent o
n re
port)
Qua
shin
g or
der (
conc
erni
ngul
timat
e de
cisi
on);
Dec
lara
tion
(in re
spec
t of e
arlie
r dec
isio
n)
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
orde
r,de
clar
atio
n.
Yes
Yes
(in
resp
ect
of p
roce
dura
lim
prop
riety
:fa
ilure
to a
llow
clai
man
t to
answ
er d
enta
lre
port.
Fai
lure
sso
bla
tant
that
decl
arat
ion
mad
e)
Yes
- ar
guab
le(in
resp
ect o
fde
cisi
on:
rele
vant
and
irrel
evan
tco
nsid
erat
ions
.Le
gal p
ositi
oncl
ear,
clas
sic
No
loss
(If a
rgua
ble
loss
, no
caus
atio
nw
ithre
spec
t to
the
serio
usfa
ult
proc
edur
alim
prop
riety
)
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
failu
re o
fco
mm
on-s
ense
.H
igh
stak
es –
depe
ndin
g on
age,
cla
iman
tm
ight
not
rece
ive
Loca
lA
utho
rity
serv
ices
)
135.
R
(Abi
di) v
Lon
don
Boro
ugh
of L
ambe
th [2
007]
EW
HC
1565
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Hou
sing
and
hom
eles
snes
sH
ousi
ng A
ct19
96Ill
egal
ity (u
ltra
vire
s, irr
elev
ant
cons
ider
atio
ns),
proc
edur
alim
prop
riety
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
136.
R
(Act
is S
A) v
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
for C
omm
uniti
es a
ndLo
cal G
over
nmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 2
417
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Bui
ldin
gR
egul
atio
nsan
d B
uild
ing
Act
198
4
Illeg
ality
, Pro
cedu
ral
Impr
oprie
ty, B
reac
h of
Legi
timat
e Ex
pect
atio
n.R
emed
y pu
t off
to la
ter h
earin
g
Allo
wed
;C
laim
ant
succ
eede
d on
proc
edur
alim
prop
riety
and
legi
tex
pect
atio
n,w
ith se
vere
criti
cism
from
judg
e.
Yes
Yes
, bre
ach
ofEC
law
,im
porta
nce
ofth
e is
sue.
Yes
, but
not s
how
nas
ano
ther
hear
ing
tobe
hel
d.
137.
R
(Aha
dyar
) v S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e fo
r the
Hom
eD
epar
tmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C66
8 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
and
asyl
umIm
mig
ratio
nA
ct 1
971,
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
es
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.
Qua
shin
gor
der
Yes
No
No
loss
138.
R
(Ahm
ad) v
Lon
don
Boro
ugh
Loca
lA
sses
smen
tsH
ousi
ng A
ctIll
egal
ity a
nd u
nfai
rnes
s of
Allo
wed
;Y
esY
esLo
ss o
f
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
of N
ewha
m [2
007]
EW
HC
2332
(Adm
in)
Aut
horit
yin
con
nect
ion
with
appl
icat
ion
for
acco
mm
odat
ion
and
lega
lity
of a
lloca
tions
polic
y
1996
indi
vidu
al d
ecis
ions
and
the
polic
y as
a w
hole
Qua
shin
g an
dde
clar
ator
yor
ders
gra
nted
in re
spec
t of
the
indi
vidu
alde
cisi
ons
appr
opria
teac
com
mod
atio
n; p
ain
and
suff
erin
g
139.
R
(Ahm
ed) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 3
102
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
es.
Imm
igra
tion
Act
197
1
Illeg
ality
, Bre
ach
of H
uman
Rig
hts
Dis
mis
sed
140.
R
(Ali)
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for
the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 1
983
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
(nat
ural
isat
ion)
Brit
ish
Nat
iona
lity
Act
198
1
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n),
proc
edur
al im
prop
riety
(del
ay)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.
Qua
shin
gor
der
Yes
No
– A
lthou
ghun
fette
red
disc
retio
n,m
eani
ngle
ssre
view
: cle
arly
impo
rtant
cons
ider
atio
ns(m
ater
ial e
rror
of fa
ct a
ndde
lay)
not
cons
ider
ed.
Prej
udic
e: fr
esh
clai
ms
expe
nsiv
e to
mak
e.
No
loss
141.
R
(Al-T
amim
i) v
Secr
etar
y of
Stat
e fo
r the
Hom
eC
entra
lG
over
nmen
tN
atur
alis
atio
nN
ot sp
ecifi
ed,
but a
ssum
eIll
egal
ityD
ism
isse
dY
esN
oN
o lo
sses
tabl
ishe
d
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
1962
(Adm
in)
Dep
artm
ent
the
Nat
iona
lity,
Imm
igra
tion
and
Asy
lum
Act
200
2
Qua
shin
g or
der
142.
R
(Am
oako
) v S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e fo
r Edu
catio
n an
d Sk
ills
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
284
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Dec
isio
nde
nyin
gfu
ndin
g fo
rst
udy
Teac
hing
and
Hig
her
Educ
atio
nA
ct 1
988;
Educ
atio
n(S
tude
ntSu
ppor
t)R
egul
atio
ns20
05
Hum
an ri
ghts
Dis
mis
sed
No
No
Loss
of
oppo
rtuni
ty
143.
R
(B) v
GSL
UK
Ltd
[200
7]EW
HC
222
7 (A
dmin
)C
entra
lG
over
nmen
tD
epar
tmen
t
Hum
an ri
ghts
Not
spec
ified
Rev
iew
of s
ecur
ity fi
rm’s
deci
sion
to im
plem
ent s
ecur
itym
easu
res w
hils
t B, a
pris
oner
,re
ceiv
ed m
edic
al tr
eatm
ent.
Bre
ach
of A
rt 3
and
8 of
EC
HR
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
ifst
atut
ory
basi
sex
ists
N/A
N/A
144.
R
(B) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rth
e H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
252
8 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
and
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
rule
sA
llege
d th
at S
S er
red
in n
ottre
atin
g B
’s c
laim
as a
fres
hcl
aim
.
Allo
wed
.D
ecis
ion
quas
hed.
Mat
ter
rem
itted
bac
kto
SS
for
reco
nsid
erat
ion
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
145.
R
(Bap
io A
ctio
n Li
mite
d an
dD
r Im
ran
Yous
af) v
Sec
reta
ryof
Sta
te fo
r the
Hom
eD
epar
tmen
t (1)
and
Sec
reta
ryof
Sta
te fo
r Hea
lth (2
) [20
07]
EWH
C 1
99 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
requ
irem
ents
for
inte
rnat
iona
lm
edic
algr
adua
tes
Imm
igra
tion
Act
197
1,Im
mig
ratio
nR
ules
, Rac
eR
elat
ions
Act
1976
Illeg
ality
, pr
oced
ural
fairn
ess
(fai
lure
to c
onsu
lt)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
inpa
rt; n
oill
egal
ity;
Rac
eR
elat
ions
actio
nsu
ccee
ded;
decl
arat
ory
relie
f
Yes
(Im
mig
ratio
nA
ct);
Yes
(Rac
eR
elat
ions
Act
);N
o (g
uida
nce
issu
ed b
y th
eD
epar
tmen
t of
Hea
lth)
No
(Im
mig
ratio
nA
ct)
Yes
(Rac
eR
elat
ions
Act
)
Expe
nse
and
time
(Im
mig
rati
on A
ct)
No
loss
(Rac
eR
elat
ions
Act
)
146.
R
(Bar
W1
Ltd)
v F
irst
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te a
nd A
nor
[200
7] E
WH
C 8
08 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent,
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(ins
uffic
ient
evi
denc
e)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
147.
R
(Bar
las a
nd O
ther
s) v
The
Con
sul-G
ener
al, B
ritis
hC
onsu
late
, Am
ster
dam
[200
7]EW
HC
170
9 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esIll
egal
ity (e
rror
of l
aw, H
RA
Art
8), I
rrat
iona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
Yes
No
No
(no
loss
)
148.
R
(Bas
hir J
umha
Alia
bo-
Julle
dah)
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
910
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esIll
egal
ity D
ism
isse
dY
esN
oN
/A
149.
R
(Bas
hir)
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
301
7 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Act
197
1Ill
egal
ityA
llow
ed.
23m
onth
sde
tent
ion.
Yes
Yes
, wen
tbe
yond
oth
erca
ses w
here
the
dete
ntio
n ha
d
Yes
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
been
allo
wed
.Is
bei
ngap
peal
ed o
n th
isgr
ound
thou
gh
150.
R
(Ber
ry) v
Cum
bria
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 3
144
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Hea
lthH
ealth
and
Soci
alSe
rvic
es a
ndSo
cial
Secu
rity
Adj
udic
atio
nA
ct 1
983
Illeg
ality
and
Pro
cedu
ral
Impr
oprie
tyD
ism
isse
d
151.
R
(Bol
t) v
Chi
ef C
omm
issi
oner
for M
erse
ysid
e [2
007]
EW
HC
2607
(Adm
in)
Chi
efC
onst
able
Polic
e co
nduc
tPo
lice
Act
1996
, Pol
ice
Con
duct
Reg
ulat
ions
Illeg
ality
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No,
no
dam
age
asin
itial
asse
ssm
ent
corr
ect
152.
R
(Bri
nson
s) v
Fin
anci
alO
mbu
dsm
an S
ervi
ce L
td[2
007]
EW
HC
253
4 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBFi
nanc
ial
Serv
ices
regu
latio
n,pe
nsio
ns
FSM
A 2
000
Illeg
ality
, FSA
had
no
juris
dict
ion
over
B.
Dis
mis
sed
153.
R
(Bri
tish
Cas
ino
Asso
ciat
ion
Ltd
and
Oth
ers)
v S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e fo
r Cul
ture
, M
edia
and
Spor
t [20
07] E
WH
C 1
312
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Gam
ing.
Reg
ulat
ion
ofca
sino
s
Gam
blin
gA
ct 2
005
Illeg
ality
(err
or o
f law
,m
isdi
rect
ion)
; pro
cedu
ral
impr
oprie
ty (c
onsu
ltatio
n)
Rem
edie
s not
stat
ed
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
(cas
ino
oper
ator
s –al
thou
gh th
eor
der i
sch
alle
nged
, the
orde
r brin
gsin
to fo
rce
No
No
(no
loss
for
repr
esen
tati
ve a
ssoc
)
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
sect
ions
of t
heac
t whi
chco
nfer
bene
fits)
No
(rep
rese
ntat
ive
asso
ciat
ion)
154.
R
(Bro
oke
& A
noth
er) v
Paro
le B
oard
& A
noth
er[2
007]
EW
HC
203
6 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Dec
isio
ns o
fPa
role
Boa
rdC
rimin
alJu
stic
e A
ct19
91, C
rime
(Sen
tenc
es)
Act
199
8,C
rimin
alJu
stic
e A
ct20
03
Illeg
ality
, irr
atio
nalit
y, h
uman
right
s
Dec
lara
tion,
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;Pa
role
Boa
rdno
tsu
ffic
ient
lyin
depe
nden
tun
der
com
mon
law
or h
uman
right
s;de
clar
ator
yre
lief g
rant
ed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
155.
R
(Bru
ce) v
Fin
anci
alO
mbu
dsm
an S
ervi
ces L
td[2
007]
EW
HC
164
6 (A
dmin
)
Om
buds
man
Pens
ions
.Fi
nanc
ial
Om
buds
men
inve
stig
atio
ns
N/A
Illeg
ality
, pro
cedu
ral i
mpr
oprie
ty(h
earin
g)D
ism
isse
dN
oN
oN
o (lo
ss?)
156.
R
(Cal
a H
omes
(Sou
th)
Lim
ited)
v (1
) Fir
st S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
(2) W
inch
este
r City
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 3
122
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent;
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Irra
tiona
lity;
pro
cedu
ral
impr
oprie
tyD
ism
isse
dN
/AN
/AN
/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
157.
R
(Cha
ntra
t) v
Secr
etar
y of
Stat
e fo
r the
Hom
eD
epar
tmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C17
07 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Nat
iona
lity,
Imm
igra
tion
and
Asy
lum
Act
200
2
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
158.
R
(Cho
ng M
eui O
oi) v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 3
221
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Act
187
1 an
dIm
mig
ratio
nR
ules
Ultr
a vi
res;
legi
timat
eex
pect
atio
ns; H
RA
Dis
mis
sed
N/A
N/A
N/A
159.
R
(Chu
rchm
an) v
Wes
tM
idla
nds P
roba
tion
Boar
d[2
007]
EW
HC
152
1 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Rel
ease
and
acco
mm
odat
ion
of p
rison
ers
Crim
inal
Just
ice
and
Cou
rtsSe
rvic
es A
ct20
00
Illeg
ality
(inc
ludi
ng u
ltra
vire
s)
Dec
lara
tion
Man
dato
ry o
rder
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
160.
R
(Col
lis) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r Com
mun
ities
and
Loc
alG
over
nmen
t and
Lon
don
Boro
ugh
of T
ower
Ham
lets
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
625
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent;
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Com
puls
ory
acqu
isiti
onA
cqui
sitio
nof
Lan
d A
ct19
81;
Hou
sing
Act
1985
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
161.
R
(Con
rad)
v S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e fo
r the
Hom
eD
epar
tmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C17
96 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Pris
oner
s –pa
role
Crim
inal
Just
ice
Act
2003
Illeg
ality
(HR
A A
rt 5)
Dec
lara
tion,
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Dec
lara
tion
Yes
No
No
loss
162.
R
(Cor
by B
orou
gh C
ounc
il) v
Cen
tral
Loca
lLo
cal
Illeg
ality
(sub
stan
tive
legi
timat
eA
llow
ed.
Yes
?N
oY
es
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
rC
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
1873
(Adm
in)
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
gove
rnm
ent
finan
ceG
over
nmen
tA
ct 2
003
expe
ctat
ion,
rele
vant
/irre
leva
ntco
nsid
erat
ions
)Q
uash
ing
and
man
dato
ryor
ders
.
163.
R
(Cou
ncil
for t
he R
egul
atio
nof
Hea
lth C
are
Prof
essi
onal
s)v
Nur
sing
And
Mid
wife
ryC
ounc
il an
d An
or [2
007]
EWH
C 1
806
(Adm
in)
ND
PBN
urse
s’pr
ofes
sion
alco
nduc
t
The
Nur
ses,
Mid
wiv
esan
d H
ealth
Vis
itors
(Pro
fess
iona
lC
ondu
ct)
Rul
es 1
993
Illeg
ality
Rem
it an
d di
rect
(app
eal
refe
renc
e)
Allo
wed
.Q
uash
ed a
ndre
mitt
ed to
tribu
nal w
ithdi
rect
ion
No
No.
No
loss
164.
R
(Dan
iels
) v L
ondo
n Bo
roug
hof
Bar
net [
2007
] EW
HC
188
5(A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Val
uatio
nde
cisi
onLo
cal
Gov
ernm
ent
Fina
nce
Act
1992
Illeg
ality
, irr
atio
nalit
y
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
165.
R
(Dav
id J
ones
and
Jud
yJo
nes)
v C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Swan
sea
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
13(A
dmin
)
Loca
lau
thor
ityPl
anni
ngTo
wn
and
Cou
ntry
Plan
ning
Act
1990
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
166.
R
(Deb
t Fre
e D
irec
t Lim
ited)
vAd
vert
isin
g St
anda
rds
Auth
ority
Lim
ited
[200
7]
ND
PBA
pplic
atio
nfo
r ext
ensi
onof
inju
nctio
n
Non
esp
ecifi
edIll
egal
ity; e
xten
ded
inju
nctio
nD
ism
isse
dU
nsur
eN
oN
o lo
sses
tabl
ishe
d
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
EWH
C 1
337
(Adm
in)
on p
ublic
atio
n
167.
R
(Dr H
aris
h D
oshi
) vSo
uthe
nd-o
n-Se
a Pr
imar
yC
are
Trus
t [20
07] E
WH
C13
61 (A
dmin
)
NH
S Tr
ust
Dec
isio
n of
apa
nel o
f the
Fam
ily H
ealth
Serv
ice
App
eal
Aut
horit
y
Trib
unal
s and
Inqu
iries
Act
1992
; and
(pre
sum
ably
)Fa
mily
Hea
lthSe
rvic
esA
ppea
lA
utho
rity
Reg
ulat
ions
1995
Illeg
ality
, pro
cedu
ral u
nfai
rnes
sD
ism
isse
dY
esN
oN
o
168.
R
(Dr T
arum
Qum
ar B
isw
as) v
Gen
eral
Med
ical
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
644
(Adm
in)
ND
PBD
ecis
ion
of th
eFi
tnes
s to
Prac
tise
Pane
lof
the
GM
C
Med
ical
Act
1983
;G
ener
alM
edic
alC
ounc
ilPr
elim
inar
yPr
ocee
ding
sC
omm
ittee
and
Prof
essi
onal
Con
duct
Proc
edur
al u
nfai
rnes
s,irr
atio
nalit
yD
ism
isse
dY
esN
oN
oca
usat
ion.
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Com
mitt
ee(P
roce
dure
)R
ules
198
8
169.
R
(E) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rth
e H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
173
1 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Acc
omm
odat
ion
and
trans
port
ofpr
ison
ers
Pris
on A
ct19
52Ill
egal
ity (i
nclu
des H
RA
)
Man
dato
ry o
rder
, dec
lara
tion
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
170.
R
(Eas
t Her
tford
shir
e D
istr
ict
Cou
ncil)
v F
irst
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
[200
7] E
WH
C 8
34(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Qua
shin
gor
der
Yes
No
No
loss
171.
R
(Fed
erat
ion
of T
our
Ope
rato
rs, T
UI U
K L
imite
d,K
uoni
Tra
vel L
imite
d) v
Her
Maj
esty
's Tr
easu
ry [2
007]
EWH
C 2
062
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Incr
ease
of a
irpa
ssen
ger d
uty
anno
unce
d by
the
Cha
ncel
lor
of th
eEx
cheq
uer a
ndre
codg
nise
inth
e Fi
nanc
eA
ct 2
007
Fina
nce
Act
2007
Illeg
ality
, hum
an ri
ghts
, EU
law
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
Fina
ncia
llo
ss
172.
R
(FH
and
Oth
ers)
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esPr
oced
ural
impr
oprie
ty (d
elay
)
Dec
lara
tions
Dis
mis
sed
Partl
yA
llow
ed
Yes
No
(in re
latio
nto
dis
mis
sed
clai
ms)
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
1571
(Adm
in)
(cla
im o
f H,
outs
tand
ing
for 5
yea
rs).
Dec
lara
tion
No
(in re
latio
nto
H–
even
thou
gh H
Rcl
aim
and
equi
vale
nt to
afr
esh
clai
m,
exce
ptio
nal
case
and
no
real
detri
men
t)
173.
R
(Fri
ends
of t
he E
arth
) vFo
od S
tand
ards
Age
ncy
[200
7] E
WH
C 5
58 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBFo
od sa
fety
Food
Stan
dard
s Act
1999
Illeg
ality
Dec
lara
tion
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
174.
R
(Gal
a C
asin
os L
imite
d) v
Gam
ing
Lice
nsin
g C
omm
ittee
for t
he P
etty
Ses
sion
alD
ivis
ion
of N
orth
ampt
on[2
007]
EW
HC
218
5 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBD
ecis
ion
of th
eG
amin
gLi
cens
ing
Com
mitt
ee to
gran
t a c
asin
olic
ence
Gam
ing
Act
1968
Illeg
ality
, irr
atio
nalit
y
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
175.
R
(Gen
eral
Med
ical
Cou
ncil)
v D
r Mic
hael
Ste
vens
on[2
007]
EW
HC
213
2 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBD
octo
r’s
regi
stra
tion
topr
actic
e
Med
ical
Act
1983
App
licat
ion
to e
xten
d su
spen
sion
of re
gist
ratio
nEx
tens
ion
gran
ted
Yes
N/A
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
176.
R
(Geo
rge
Wim
pey
UK
Lim
ited)
v F
irst
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
[200
7] E
WH
C 4
75(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
177.
R
(Gne
zele
) v L
eeds
City
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 3
275
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent;
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esQ
uest
ion
of w
ho is
resp
onsi
ble
for f
ulfil
ling
duty
Dis
mis
sed
N/A
N/A
N/A
178.
R
(Gre
enpe
ace)
v S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e fo
r Tra
de a
nd In
dust
ry[2
007]
EW
HC
311
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Polic
yde
cisi
on in
Ener
gyR
evie
w
Inte
rnat
iona
lco
nven
tion;
Whi
te P
aper
Proc
edur
al u
nfai
rnes
s
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;de
clar
ator
yre
lief g
rant
ed
No
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
179.
R
(Gup
ta) v
Gen
eral
Med
ical
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
918
(Adm
in)
ND
PBA
ppea
l.Fi
tnes
s to
prac
tice
med
icin
e
Med
icin
e A
ct19
83Pr
oced
ural
Impr
oprie
tyD
ism
isse
d
180.
R
(Gw
ynn)
v G
ener
al M
edic
alC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
314
5(A
dmin
)
ND
PBA
ppea
l.Fi
tnes
s to
prac
tice
med
icin
e
Med
icin
e A
ct19
83Pr
oced
ural
Impr
oprie
ty,
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
,Q
uash
ing
orde
rs.
As t
heac
tion
had
been
hea
rd
Yes
Bor
derli
ne, t
his
conc
erne
dal
low
ing
afit
ness
topr
actic
e ac
tion
No,
no
dam
age
asdi
d no
t in
the
even
tpr
ocee
d to
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
prom
ptly
then
ther
e ha
d no
tbe
en a
dete
rmin
atio
nby
the
GM
C
in c
ases
cle
arly
out o
f tim
e in
asi
tuat
ion
whe
reth
ere
was
no
pow
er to
do
so.
This
cou
pled
with
the
impo
rtanc
e of
the
issu
es p
oint
in fa
vour
.A
gain
st th
is, G
had
not b
een
the
subj
ect o
f aru
ling
of th
eG
MC
a fu
llhe
arin
g or
susp
ensi
on
181.
R
(Haa
se) v
(1) I
ndep
ende
ntAd
judi
cato
r Dis
tric
t Jud
geN
utta
ll, (2
) The
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
for J
ustic
e [2
007]
EWH
C 3
079
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
e;C
entra
lG
over
nmen
tD
epar
tmen
t
Pris
oner
’srig
hts
conc
erni
ngtri
al fo
rex
tens
ion
ofse
nten
cebe
caus
e of
disc
iplin
ary
issu
e
HR
AH
RA
(Art
6)D
ism
isse
dN
/AN
/AN
/A
182.
R
(Har
grea
ves)
v L
ondo
nBo
roug
h of
Hac
kney
[200
7]EW
HC
230
5 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Land
lord
and
tena
nt.
Poss
essi
onpr
ocee
ding
s
N/A
Illeg
ality
(sub
stan
tive
legi
timat
eex
pect
atio
n), p
roce
dura
lim
prop
riety
(dut
y to
act
fairl
y)
Dis
mis
sed
No
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
183.
R
(Har
ris)
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent
[200
7] E
WH
C 3
218
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Crim
inal
proc
edur
e an
dco
mpe
nsat
ion
Crim
inal
Just
ice
Act
1988
Illeg
ality
; Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
N/A
N/A
N/A
184.
R
(Hill
) v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
164
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Dec
isio
ns o
fSe
cret
ary
ofSt
ate
not t
ofo
llow
the
advi
ce o
f the
Paro
le B
oard
conc
erni
ngcl
aim
ant’s
pris
onco
nditi
ons
Pris
on A
ct19
52; P
rison
Rul
es 1
999;
Pris
onSe
rvic
e or
der
; Crim
inal
Just
ice
Act
2003
;C
rimin
alJu
stic
e A
ct19
91
Illeg
ality
, irr
atio
nalit
y
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
Yes
No
Mor
ere
stric
tive
pris
onco
nditi
ons;
anxi
ety
185.
R
(Hoo
k) v
Soc
ial S
ecur
ityC
omm
issi
oner
s [20
07] E
WH
C17
05 (A
dmin
)
Trib
unal
Soci
al se
curit
y(h
ousi
ngbe
nefit
)
Soci
alSe
curit
y A
ct19
98
Mis
dire
ctio
n (in
clud
es H
RA
and
insu
ffic
ient
reas
ons)
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
186.
R
(How
es) v
Chi
ld S
uppo
rtTr
ibun
alC
hild
supp
ort
Chi
ld S
uppo
rtIll
egal
ity (r
elev
ant/i
rrel
evan
tA
llow
ed.
Yes
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Com
mis
sion
ers [
2007
] EW
HC
559
(Adm
in)
Act
199
1co
nsid
erat
ions
)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Qua
shin
gor
der
187.
R
(Ind
epen
dent
Pol
ice
Com
plai
nts C
omm
issi
on) a
ndC
hief
Con
stab
le o
f Wes
tM
erci
a v
PC D
avid
Wal
ton
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
035
(Adm
in)
ND
PBSt
ayin
g of
polic
edi
scip
linar
ypr
ocee
ding
by
polic
e pa
nel
Polic
e A
ct19
96Q
uash
ing
and
man
dato
ry o
rder
sA
llow
ed;
Qua
shin
g an
dm
anda
tory
orde
rs g
rant
ed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
188.
R
(Ind
epen
dent
Pol
ice
Com
plai
nts C
omm
issi
on) v
Wes
t Mid
land
s Pol
ice
[200
7]EW
HC
271
5 (A
dmin
)
Chi
efC
onst
able
Polic
ehe
arin
gsPo
lice
Act
1983
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Yes
No
No,
no
dam
age
189.
R
(Jac
quel
ine
Trat
t) v
Hor
sham
Dis
tric
t Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
485
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng(G
ener
alD
evel
opm
ent
Proc
edur
e)O
rder
199
5
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
,Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
Yes
No
Inte
rfer
enc
e w
ithpr
oper
ty;
dim
inut
ion
in v
alue
190.
R
(Jon
es) v
Leg
al S
ervi
ces
Com
mis
sion
[200
7] E
WH
C21
06 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBLe
gal a
idA
cces
s to
Just
ice
Act
1999
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
191.
R
(Jun
cal)
v Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent
[200
7] E
WH
C 3
024
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Men
tal h
ealth
;un
law
ful
dete
ntio
n
Men
tal
Hea
lth(N
orth
ern
Irel
and)
Ord
er 1
986
Illeg
ality
; HR
A (A
rt 5)
Dis
mis
sed
N/A
N/A
N/A
192.
R
(K) v
Hal
ton
Boro
ugh
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
485
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Ret
entio
n of
pers
onal
dat
aN
ot sp
ecifi
ed.
Polic
yco
ncer
ning
rete
ntio
n an
dde
stru
ctio
n of
reco
rds
cont
aine
d in
Dep
artm
ent
Cod
e of
Prac
tice.
Ther
e m
ust
be a
stat
utor
yba
sis t
houg
h.In
any
eve
ntre
lianc
e al
sopl
aced
on
Dat
aPr
otec
tion
Act
199
8th
ough
cas
edi
dn’t
turn
on
it.
Cha
lleng
e to
Loc
al A
utho
rity’
sde
cisi
on n
ot to
des
troy
file
cont
aini
ng se
nsiti
ve p
erso
nal
info
con
cern
ing
K, w
hich
was
then
impr
oper
ly d
iscl
osed
. File
cont
aine
d in
fo c
once
rnin
gal
lega
tions
mad
e ag
ains
t K, a
head
teac
her,
with
rega
rd to
girl
pupi
ls a
nd th
en a
buse
of h
is o
wn
son.
Acq
uitte
d fo
r bot
h. P
rom
ise
mad
e by
Loc
al A
utho
rity
that
reco
rd w
ould
be
dest
roye
d.Fa
ilure
to d
o so
(1) b
reac
h of
legi
timat
e ex
pect
atio
n (2
) bre
ach
of A
rt 8
of E
CH
R. A
ltern
ativ
ely,
K so
ught
ord
er th
at L
ocal
Aut
horit
y co
nduc
t a ri
skas
sess
men
t of K
to d
eter
min
ew
heth
er o
r not
to d
estro
y th
e fil
e.
Allo
wed
.O
rder
edde
stru
ctio
n of
file.
Yes
Yes
No
loss
193.
R
(Kam
el) v
Gen
eral
Med
ical
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 3
13N
DPB
Dec
isio
n of
the
Fitn
ess t
oM
edic
al A
ctIll
egal
ityD
ism
isse
dN
oN
oN
o
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
(Adm
in)
Prac
tise
Pane
lof
the
GM
C19
83Q
uash
ing
and
man
dato
ry o
rder
s?ca
usat
ion.
194.
R
(Kur
taj)
v Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
21 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
and
asyl
umIm
mig
ratio
nA
ct 1
971,
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
es, E
CH
R
Hum
an ri
ghts
Allo
wed
Art
3EC
HR
cla
imsu
ccee
ds
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
195.
R
(L) v
Not
tingh
amsh
ire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C23
64 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Prov
isio
n of
acco
mm
odat
ion
Chi
ldre
n A
ct19
89Ir
ratio
nalit
yA
llow
ed.
Dec
lara
tion
and
man
dato
ryor
ders
gra
nted
Yes
No
Loss
of
acco
mm
odat
ion
196.
R
(Lad
y Be
rkel
ey) v
Fir
stSe
cret
ary
of S
tate
and
Ors
[200
7] E
WH
C 6
70 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(err
or o
f law
,m
isdi
rect
ion)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
197.
R
(Lan
agh)
v S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e fo
r the
Hom
eD
epar
tmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C16
48 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
esIll
egal
ity (f
ailu
re to
con
side
rin
divi
dual
cas
e on
mer
its)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
198.
R
(Leg
al R
emed
y U
K L
imite
d)v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
r Hea
lth[2
007]
EW
HC
125
2 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Dec
isio
n of
are
view
bod
yap
prov
ed b
yth
e Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
.C
hang
ed th
ew
eb-b
ased
Not
spec
ified
Illeg
ality
, irr
atio
nalit
y,pr
oced
ural
unf
airn
ess
Qua
shin
g or
der a
nd d
ecla
ratio
n
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
Yes
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
appl
icat
ions
syst
em fo
rpo
stgr
adua
tem
edic
altra
inin
g
199.
R
(Lei
cest
er G
amin
g C
lub)
vG
ambl
ing
Com
mis
sion
[200
7]EW
HC
531
(Adm
in)
ND
PBG
amin
glic
ensi
ngG
amin
g A
ct19
68Ill
egal
ity.
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.
Qua
shin
gor
der
Yes
No
Yes
200.
R
(Lei
cest
ersh
ire
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil)
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for C
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
1427
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
No
(Loc
alA
utho
rity
only
has g
ener
alpu
blic
inte
rest
to p
rote
ct in
this
con
text
;or
dina
rily
itex
erci
ses
pow
ers f
orth
eir b
enef
it)
No
No
loss
201.
R
(Lew
is) v
Red
car a
ndC
leve
land
Bor
ough
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 3
166
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Con
serv
atio
n(N
atur
alH
abita
ts, e
tc)
Reg
ulat
ions
1994
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ry
Illeg
ality
(bia
s and
pred
eter
min
atio
n);
mis
appl
icat
ion
of in
tegr
ity te
stun
der 1
994
Reg
ulat
ions
Dec
lara
tion
soug
ht.
Allo
wed
inpa
rt (b
ias
mad
e ou
t but
not b
reac
h of
Reg
ulat
ions
).
Plan
ning
perm
issi
on
No
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Plan
ning
(Env
ironm
ent
al Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent)
(Eng
land
and
Wal
es)
Reg
ulat
ions
1999
quas
hed
202.
R
(Lon
don
Fire
and
Emer
genc
y Pl
anni
ngAu
thor
ity) v
The
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
for C
omm
uniti
es a
ndLo
cal G
over
nmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 1
176
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Dec
isio
n of
the
Secr
etar
y of
Stat
e to
allo
wap
peal
s and
impo
sing
are
duct
ion
inpe
nalti
esra
ther
than
dism
issa
l in
disc
iplin
ary
hear
ings
of
two
fire
fight
ers
Fire
Ser
vice
sA
ct 1
947;
Fire
Ser
vice
s(D
isci
plin
e)R
egul
atio
ns19
85
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
Yes
No
(bor
derli
ne– m
isin
terp
reta
tion
of ro
le)
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
203.
R
(Low
) v G
ener
alO
steo
path
ic C
ounc
il [2
007]
EWH
C 2
839
(Adm
in)
ND
PBM
edic
ine,
Fitn
ess t
opr
actic
e
Ost
eopa
ths
Act
199
3Ill
egal
ity
App
eal
Dis
mis
sed
204.
R
(Mar
dan
Mah
moo
d) v
Gen
eral
Med
ical
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 4
74 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBC
ance
llatio
nof
doc
tor’
sre
gist
ratio
n by
Fitn
ess t
o
Med
ical
Act
1983
Proc
edur
al u
nfai
rnes
s
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Yes
Yes
, ser
ious
brea
ch o
fpr
oced
ural
fairn
ess,
failu
re
No
caus
atio
n.
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Prac
tise
Pane
lof
the
GM
Cto
take
into
acco
unt h
ealth
issu
e an
d go
ing
on w
ith h
earin
gin
abs
entia
205.
R
(Mar
ie L
arki
n, J
ohn
War
d,Ei
leen
Gen
tle, T
eres
a D
oole
y,M
artin
a W
ard)
v (1
) Sec
reta
ryof
Sta
te (2
) Che
lmsf
ord
Boro
ugh
Cou
ncil
[200
7]EW
HC
125
9 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent;
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
206.
R
(Mat
embe
ra) v
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
2334
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Prov
isio
n of
acco
mm
odat
ion
for f
orm
eras
ylum
seek
ers
Imm
igra
tion
and
Asy
lum
Act
199
9
Illeg
ality
, hum
an ri
ghts
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
207.
R
(Mat
thew
s) v
Tam
wor
thBo
roug
h C
ounc
il [2
007]
EWH
C 3
278
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Yes
No
N/A
208.
R
(Maw
le) v
Wes
t Oxf
ords
hire
Dis
tric
t Cou
ncil
[200
7]EW
HC
139
6 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
Yes
209.
R
(Mic
hael
Coo
per)
v T
hePa
role
Boa
rd [2
007]
EW
HC
Trib
unal
Paro
lede
cisi
onC
rimin
alJu
stic
e A
ct19
91; P
arol
e
Illeg
ality
, hum
an ri
ghts
Dec
lara
tion,
dam
ages
for h
uman
Allo
wed
Yes
No
Dam
ages
for
dete
ntio
n
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
1292
(Adm
in)
Boa
rd R
ules
right
s bre
ach
for a
nex
tend
edpe
riod
210.
R
(MM
R) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t[2
007]
EW
HC
213
4 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
;de
tent
ion
Imm
igra
tion
Act
Illeg
ality
Allo
wed
.D
ecla
ratio
ngr
ante
d on
men
tal h
ealth
poin
t, re
fuse
don
oth
ergr
ound
s
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
211.
R
(Mor
tell)
v O
ldha
mBo
roug
h C
ounc
il [2
007]
EWH
C 1
526
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90; T
own
and
Cou
ntry
Plan
ning
(Env
ironm
ent
al Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent)
(Eng
land
and
Wal
es)
Reg
ulat
ions
1999
Illeg
ality
(rel
evan
tco
nsid
erat
ions
)
Qua
shin
g or
ders
Allo
wed
.
Qua
shin
gor
ders
Yes
No
No
loss
212.
R
(Mpa
si) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t[2
007]
EW
HC
256
2 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
,re
mov
alIm
mig
ratio
nA
ct 1
971
Illeg
ality
; Irr
atio
nalit
yD
ism
isse
d
213.
R
(Ms F
) v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
Cen
tral
Imm
igra
tion
N/A
Irra
tiona
lity.
Dis
mis
sed
No
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent
[200
7] E
WH
C 4
07 (A
dmin
)G
over
nmen
tD
epar
tmen
tD
ecla
ratio
n
214.
R
(N) v
Men
tal H
ealth
Rev
iew
Trib
unal
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
524
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
Cha
lleng
e to
deci
sion
s of
tribu
nal
Men
tal
Hea
lth A
ct19
83
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n)
Qua
shin
g or
ders
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
215.
R
(Nad
esu)
v S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e fo
r the
Hom
eD
epar
tmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C31
05 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Act
197
1Ill
egal
ityA
llow
ed, i
nth
at th
e co
urt
held
that
the
appl
ican
t’sne
wsu
bmis
sion
sam
ount
ed to
a“f
resh
cla
im”
Yes
No
No
216.
R
(Nep
tune
Wha
rf L
imite
d) v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
r Tra
dean
d In
dust
ry [2
007]
EW
HC
1036
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Acq
uisi
tion
of L
and
Act
1981
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
Yes
217.
R
(Nor
th W
iltsh
ire
Dis
tric
tC
ounc
il) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r Com
mun
ities
and
Loc
alG
over
nmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C88
6 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(rel
evan
t/irr
elev
ant
cons
ider
atio
ns);
irrat
iona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
ders
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
218.
R
(O) v
The
Inde
pend
ent
Appe
al P
anel
for t
he L
ondo
nBo
roug
h of
Tow
er H
amle
ts
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Scho
oldi
scip
line
Educ
atio
n(P
upil
Excl
usio
nsan
d A
ppea
ls)
Proc
edur
al fa
irnes
s (de
cisi
on n
otto
join
t app
eals
unf
air)
; ille
galit
y(m
isdi
rect
ion)
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
455
(Adm
in)
(Mai
ntai
ned
Scho
ols)
(Eng
land
)R
egul
atio
ns20
02
Qua
shin
g or
der
219.
R
(O’C
onne
ll) v
Par
ole
Boar
d[2
007]
EW
HC
259
1 (A
dmin
)C
entra
lG
over
nmen
tD
epar
tmen
t
Rol
e of
Par
ole
Boa
rdC
rimin
alJu
stic
e A
ct20
03
Hum
an R
ight
s, pr
oced
ural
impr
oprie
tyD
ism
isse
d
220.
R
(Otle
y) v
Bar
king
&D
agen
ham
NH
S Pr
imar
y C
are
Trus
t [20
07] E
WH
C 1
927
(Adm
in)
NH
S PC
TD
rug
treat
men
tN
ot st
ated
Irra
tiona
lity
Allo
wed
;qu
ashe
d an
dre
mitt
ed.
Not
kno
wn
No
No
loss
221.
R
(Paj
aziti
and
Ano
ther
) vSe
cret
ary
of S
tate
for t
heH
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
187
4 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
(nat
iona
las
sist
ance
)
Nat
iona
lA
ssis
tanc
eA
ct 1
948
Illeg
ality
Rem
edie
s not
stat
ed
Dis
mis
sed
No
(this
is th
eis
sue
for
deci
sion
)
No
No
222.
R
(Pat
ienc
e) v
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
for C
omm
uniti
es a
ndLo
cal G
over
nmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 3
111
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der r
egar
ding
the
deci
sion
of a
n In
spec
tor
appo
inte
d by
the
first
def
enda
ntdi
smis
sing
the
clai
man
t's a
ppea
lag
ains
t the
refu
sal o
f the
seco
ndde
fend
ant t
o pe
rmit
the
erec
tion
of a
det
ache
d ho
use.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
223.
R
(Pau
l Buk
owic
ki) v
Nor
tham
pton
shir
e C
ount
yC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
310
(Adm
in)
Loca
lau
thor
ityG
uard
ians
hip
Men
tal
Hea
lth A
ct19
83
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
224.
R
(Pau
l) v
Assi
stan
t Dep
uty
Cor
oner
of I
nner
Wes
t Lon
don
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
721
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
genc
yA
dmis
sibl
ehe
arsa
yC
oron
ers A
ct19
84Ill
egal
ityA
llow
edY
esN
o, R
ule
37w
as c
onfu
sing
lydr
afte
d
No
225.
R
(Per
sim
mon
Hom
es L
td) v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
rC
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
1985
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(rel
evan
t/irr
elev
ant
cons
ider
atio
ns);
Irra
tiona
lity
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
226.
R
(Pet
er B
row
n) v
(1)
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
rC
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent (
2) S
uffo
lkC
oast
al D
istr
ict C
ounc
il[2
007]
EW
HC
230
2 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent,
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Dec
isio
n of
insp
ecto
rap
poin
ted
byD
CLG
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
, irr
atio
nalit
y
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
227.
R
(Phi
lip H
arki
ns) v
The
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 6
39 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Act
198
9Ir
ratio
nalit
y
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
(bor
derli
ne- w
asim
pris
oned
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
afte
r the
deci
sion
pend
ing
extra
ditio
nbu
t not
argu
ed o
nth
e fa
cts)
228.
R
(Pla
yfoo
t (a
min
or))
vM
illai
s Sch
ool [
2007
] EW
HC
1698
(Adm
in)
ND
PBH
R –
Art
9.Sc
hool
unifo
rm p
olic
y
N/A
Illeg
ality
(HR
A)
Dis
mis
sed
No
No
No
loss
229.
R
(R) v
Ken
t Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
135
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Educ
atio
nEd
ucat
ion
Act
Illeg
ality
Unc
lear
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
dam
ages
230.
R
(Rah
man
& A
noth
er) v
Har
ring
ey N
HS
Teac
hing
Prim
ary
Car
e Tr
ust [
2007
]EW
HC
584
(Adm
in)
NH
S PC
TN
HS
lega
lar
rang
emen
ts(s
imila
r to
cont
ract
s)
Nat
iona
lH
ealth
and
Com
mun
ityC
are
Act
1990
;N
atio
nal
Hea
lthSe
rvic
e(G
ener
alM
edic
alSe
rvic
esC
ontra
cts)
Reg
ulat
ions
Irra
tiona
lity,
ille
galit
y
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.R
elie
f gra
nted
on o
ne p
oint
,Tr
ust n
oten
title
d to
term
inat
eco
ntra
ct
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
(per
haps
inte
rim lo
ssof
ear
ning
set
c fr
omth
e in
itial
date
of
term
inat
ion
)
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
2004
231.
R
(Rai
ssi)
v Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
43 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Hom
e O
ffic
eex
gra
tiaco
mpe
nsat
ion
sche
me
for
wro
ngfu
llych
arge
d/co
nvic
ted
pers
ons
No
stat
ute
–po
licy
stat
emen
t
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed.
No
stat
ute;
inan
y ca
se th
ecl
aim
ant d
idno
t fal
l with
inth
e te
rms o
fth
e ex
gra
tiasc
hem
e
No
Loss
of
com
pens
ati
on
232.
R
(Ral
ston
Wel
lingt
on) v
The
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 1
109
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Act
Hum
an ri
ghts
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
233.
R
(Ram
bler
s Ass
ocia
tion)
vSe
cret
ary
of S
tate
for D
efen
ce[2
007]
EW
HC
139
8 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Dec
isio
n ab
out
the
stop
ping
up o
f afo
otpa
th fo
rde
fenc
epu
rpos
es
Def
ence
Act
1842
Illeg
ality
Dec
lara
tion
Allo
wed
inpa
rt. G
roun
d 1
Dis
mis
sed;
Gro
und
2A
llow
ed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
234.
R
(Rob
ert C
hast
on a
ndK
athe
rine
Cha
ston
) v D
evon
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C12
09 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lau
thor
ityH
ighw
ay la
wH
ighw
ays
Act
198
0Ir
ratio
nalit
y, p
roce
dura
lun
fairn
ess
Qua
shin
g an
d m
anda
tory
ord
ers
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
and
man
dato
ryor
ders
gra
nted
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
235.
R
(Roy
al M
ail G
roup
plc
) vPo
stal
Ser
vice
s Com
mis
sion
[200
7] E
WH
C 6
35 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBR
egul
atio
n of
Roy
al M
ail
Post
alSe
rvic
es A
ct20
00
Illeg
ality
(ultr
a vi
res)
.
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
236.
R
(S) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rth
e H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
51
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
&Im
mig
ratio
nN
atio
nalit
y,Im
mig
ratio
nan
d A
sylu
mA
ct 2
002
Rev
iew
of d
ecis
ion
to re
mov
e S
to A
fgha
nist
an. C
laim
for a
sylu
mto
ok 4
yea
rs to
det
erm
ine.
Adj
udic
ator
dis
mis
sed
S’s
appe
al. A
pplic
atio
n fo
rdi
scre
tiona
ry le
ave
to re
mai
nre
fuse
d. S
S ce
rtifie
d th
at n
o rig
htto
app
eal.
Alle
ged
SS (1
)br
each
ed le
gitim
ate
expe
ctat
ion
that
app
licat
ion
wou
ld b
e de
alt
with
with
in re
ason
able
tim
e.D
epriv
ed h
im o
f his
ent
itlem
ent
of IL
R –
unf
air a
nd a
buse
of
proc
ess (
2) fa
ilure
s mad
e it
disp
ropo
rtion
ate
to re
mov
e hi
m.
Bre
ach
of A
rt 8
of E
CH
R. (
3)de
cisi
on to
cer
tify
wro
ng.
Allo
wed
.R
emov
aldi
rect
ions
and
certi
ficat
ion
quas
hed.
Cla
imre
mitt
ed b
ack
to S
S to
reco
nsid
er in
light
of
judg
men
t.
Yes
Yes
–m
isle
adin
gna
ture
of a
dvic
egi
ven
conc
erni
ng th
eab
ility
to m
ake
new
app
licat
ion
whe
n re
turn
edto
Afg
hani
stan
Yes
237.
R
(S) v
The
Lon
don
Boro
ugh
of S
utto
n [2
007]
EW
HC
119
6(A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Prov
isio
n of
acco
mm
odat
ion
Chi
ldre
n A
ct19
89Ill
egal
ity
Dec
lara
tion
and
man
dato
ry o
rder
Allo
wed
Yes
No
(bor
derli
ne)
Yes
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
238.
R
(Sav
e Br
itian
’s H
erita
ge) v
Wes
tmin
ster
City
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 8
07 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Plan
ning
(Lis
ted
Bui
ldin
gs a
ndC
onse
rvat
ion
Are
as) A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
No
No
No
loss
239.
R
(SH
) v M
enta
l Hea
lthRe
view
Tri
buna
l [20
07]
EWH
C 8
84 (A
dmin
)
Trib
unal
Men
tal H
ealth
Men
tal
Hea
lth A
ct19
83
Rev
iew
of t
ribun
al’s
dec
isio
nth
at S
H sh
ould
not
rece
ive
anab
solu
te d
isch
arge
from
hos
pita
lor
der a
nd a
rest
rictio
n or
der t
ow
hich
he
was
subj
ect.
Alle
ged
that
con
ditio
nal d
isch
arge
(spe
cific
ally
pro
visi
on w
hich
requ
ired
him
to c
ompl
y w
ithco
nditi
ons)
inte
rfer
ed w
ith h
isco
mm
on la
w ri
ght o
f “ab
solu
tech
oice
” co
ncer
ning
whe
ther
toac
cept
/reje
ct m
edic
al tr
eatm
ent
and
his r
ight
s und
er A
rt 8
ofEC
HR
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
240.
R
(Sm
ith) v
Gen
eral
Tea
chin
gC
ounc
il fo
r Eng
land
[200
7]EW
HC
167
5 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBTe
ache
rs’
prof
essi
onal
cond
uct
Teac
hing
and
Hig
her
Educ
atio
nA
ct 1
998
Illeg
ality
(err
or o
f fac
t)
Qua
shin
g
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
No
241.
R
(Sof
twar
e So
lutio
nsPa
rtne
rs L
imite
d) v
Her
Maj
esty
's C
omm
issi
oner
s for
Cus
tom
s and
Exc
ise
[200
7]
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
VA
Tas
sess
men
tV
alue
Add
edTa
x A
ct 1
994
Illeg
ality
, del
ay
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
EWH
C 9
71 (A
dmin
)
242.
R
(Sou
thw
ark
Law
Cen
tre)
vLe
gal S
ervi
ces C
omm
issi
on[2
007]
EW
HC
171
5 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBLe
gal a
idC
omm
unity
Lega
l Ser
vice
(Fin
anci
al)
Reg
ulat
ions
2000
Illeg
ality
Allo
wed
,Q
uash
ing
orde
r.R
emitt
ed.
Yes
No
Yes
243.
R
(Spi
ropo
ulos
) v B
righ
ton
and
Hov
e C
ity C
ounc
il [2
007]
EWH
C 3
42 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Met
hod
ofpa
ying
hous
ing
bene
fit
Hou
sing
Ben
efit
Reg
ulat
ions
2006
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
244.
R
(Sur
yana
nda)
v T
he W
elsh
Min
iste
rs [2
007]
EW
HC
173
6(A
dmin
)
Dev
olve
dA
dmin
istra
tion
Ani
mal
hea
lth–
bovi
netu
berc
ulos
is
Ani
mal
Hea
lth A
ct19
81
Illeg
ality
(HR
Art
9)A
llow
ed;
Qua
shin
gor
der a
ndde
clar
atio
nsgr
ante
d.
No
No
Yes
245.
R
(Sw
inde
lls) v
LB
ofG
reen
wic
h [2
007]
EW
HC
2131
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Hou
sing
Proc
edur
al Im
prop
riety
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
246.
R
(T) v
Inde
pend
ent A
ppea
lPa
nel f
or D
evon
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 7
63
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Educ
atio
nEd
ucat
ion
Act
200
2R
evie
w o
f dec
isio
n of
Loc
alA
utho
rity
appe
al p
anel
upho
ldin
g an
exc
lusi
on fr
omsc
hool
. Gro
unds
wer
e
Allo
wed
.D
ecis
ion
ofpa
nel q
uash
edan
d th
e m
atte
r
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
(Adm
in)
inad
equa
cy o
f dec
isio
n le
tter,
failu
re to
com
ply
with
rele
vant
regu
latio
ns a
nd o
blig
atio
ns u
nder
the
Dis
abili
ty D
iscr
imin
atio
n A
ct19
95.
rem
itted
for a
fres
hco
nsid
erat
ion
247.
R
(T) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rth
e H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
307
4 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Prov
isio
n of
safe
acco
mm
odat
ion
in a
nIm
mig
ratio
nR
emov
alC
entre
Imm
igra
tion
Act
197
1Ill
egal
ityD
ism
isse
dN
/AN
/AN
/A
248.
R
(Ter
ry L
ake)
v (1
) The
Gov
erno
r, H
MP
Hig
hdow
n,(2
) The
Inde
pend
ent
Adju
dica
tor (
3) T
he S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for J
ustic
e [2
007]
EWH
C 3
080
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Pris
oner
’srig
hts
conc
erni
ngtri
al fo
rex
tens
ion
ofse
nten
cebe
caus
e of
disc
iplin
ary
issu
e
Hum
anR
ight
s Act
1998
HR
A (A
rt 6)
Dis
mis
sed
N/A
N/A
N/A
249.
R
(The
Bri
tish
Uni
on fo
r the
Abol
ition
of V
ivis
ectio
n) v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 1
964
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Ani
mal
wel
fare
Ani
mal
s(S
cien
tific
Proc
edur
es)
Act
198
6
1.
SSH
D’s
cla
ssifi
catio
n in
inst
ant c
ase:
ille
galit
y(m
isdi
rect
ion)
2.
Chi
ef in
spec
tor’
s rep
ort:
irrat
iona
lity
Allo
wed
(1)
Dec
lara
tion
Dis
mis
sed
(2 –
4)
No
1: N
o (a
rgua
ble
– cl
ear e
rror
s of
law
, but
attri
buta
ble
toex
cusa
ble
glos
son
seve
rity
cond
ition
s –
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
3.
Gen
eral
issu
e co
ncer
ning
SSH
D’s
cla
ssifi
catio
ns:
illeg
ality
(irr
elev
ant
cons
ider
atio
ns)
4.
Proc
edur
e co
ncer
ning
SSH
D’s
gui
danc
e:pr
oced
ural
impr
oprie
ty
Dec
lara
tions
scie
ntis
t wou
ldpr
obab
ly h
ave
adi
ffere
ntin
terp
reta
tion)
2 –
4: N
o
250.
R
(The
Inco
rpor
ated
Tru
stee
sof
the
Nat
iona
l Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rBu
sine
ss, E
nter
pris
e an
dRe
gula
tory
Ref
orm
[200
7]EW
HC
309
0 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Age
disc
rimin
atio
nEu
rope
anC
omm
uniti
esA
ct 1
972
Illeg
ality
(ultr
a vi
res)
Art
234
refe
renc
em
ade.
The
case
repo
rt is
in th
e fo
rm o
fth
e re
fere
nce.
No
N/A
No
loss
251.
R
(The
Law
Soc
iety
and
Ano
r)v
Lega
l Ser
vice
s Com
mis
sion
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
848
(Adm
in)
ND
PBPu
blic
proc
urem
ent.
Lega
l aid
Publ
icC
ontra
cts
Reg
ulat
ions
2006
Illeg
ality
Dec
lara
tion
Allo
wed
Dec
lara
tion
No
(Law
Soci
ety)
Yes
(par
ticul
arfir
m a
lso
ade
fend
ant)
No
(com
plex
law
; onl
yfa
iling
was
that
cont
ract
not
suff
icie
ntly
prec
ise)
No
loss
for
the
Law
Soci
ety
Not
kno
wn
(in re
latio
nto
the
parti
cula
rfir
m –
dam
ages
clai
m to
be
dete
rmin
ed
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
in Q
BD
)
252.
R
(The
Mid
coun
ties C
o-O
pera
tive)
v T
he F
ores
t of
Dea
n D
istr
ict C
ounc
il [2
007]
EWH
C 1
714
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
ders
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
orde
rs g
rant
ed
Yes
No
No
Loss
253.
R
(Tra
nspo
rt fo
r Lon
don)
vTh
e Pa
rkin
g Ad
judi
cato
r[2
007]
EW
HC
117
2 (A
dmin
)
Trib
unal
Enfo
rcem
ent
of p
arki
ngre
gula
tions
Roa
d Tr
affic
Act
199
1Ill
egal
ity
Dec
lara
tion
Dis
mis
sed
No
No
No
loss
254.
R
(Tre
e an
d W
ildlif
e Ac
tion
Com
mitt
ee L
td) v
The
For
estr
yC
omm
issi
oner
s [20
07] E
WH
C16
23 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBPl
anni
ng &
envi
ronm
ent
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
(For
estry
)(E
ngla
nd a
ndW
ales
)R
egul
atio
ns19
99
Mis
dire
ctio
n.
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
.
Qua
shin
gor
der.
Dec
isio
nre
mitt
ed to
Com
mis
sion
ers.
No
No
(firs
t tim
ere
gula
tions
had
been
inte
rpre
ted)
No
loss
255.
R
(Vuu
ren)
v G
ener
al M
edic
alC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
553
(Adm
in)
ND
PBSu
spen
sion
of
doct
or’s
regi
stra
tion
byG
MC
Med
ical
Act
1983
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
Loss
of
earn
ings
/ab
ility
topr
actic
e
256.
R
(War
e) v
Nea
th P
ort T
albo
tC
ounc
il an
d An
or [2
007]
Loca
lPl
anni
ngTo
wn
and
Cou
ntry
Proc
edur
al im
prop
riety
,A
llow
ed;
quas
hed
and
Yes
No
(adv
ice
perh
aps o
ver-
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
EWH
C 9
13 (A
dmin
)A
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Act
1990
irrat
iona
lity
Qua
shin
g (a
ppea
l)
rem
itted
egge
d, b
utco
unci
llors
acte
d ho
nest
ly)
257.
R
(Wes
ley
Blac
kett)
v (1
) The
Gov
erno
r of H
MP
Risl
ey (2
)Th
e Pr
obat
ion
Serv
ice
(3) T
hePa
role
Boa
rd [2
007]
EW
HC
2283
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Dec
isio
n of
the
Paro
le B
oard
impo
sing
aco
nditi
on o
fre
side
nce
oncl
aim
ant’s
bai
l
Not
spec
ified
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
(alth
ough
orde
r to
bequ
ashe
d an
dre
plac
ed a
t ala
ter s
tage
)
Yes
ifst
atut
ory
basi
sex
ists
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
258.
R
(Win
ches
ter C
ity C
ounc
il) v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
rC
omm
uniti
es a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent [
2007
] EW
HC
2303
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
259.
R
(Win
ches
ter C
olle
ge) v
Ham
pshi
re C
C [2
007]
EW
HC
2786
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Rig
hts o
f Way
Nat
ural
Envi
ronm
ent
and
Rur
alC
omm
uniti
esA
ct 2
006,
Wild
life
and
Cou
ntry
side
Act
198
1
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
260.
R
(Zoo
life
Inte
rnat
iona
l Ltd
) vSe
cret
ary
of S
tate
for
Envi
ronm
ent,
Food
and
Rur
alAf
fair
s [20
07] E
WH
C 2
995
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Insp
ectio
ns o
fzo
osZo
oLi
cens
ing
1981
Illeg
ality
; irr
atio
nalit
y
Soug
ht d
ecla
rato
ry re
lief
Dis
mis
sed
N/A
N/A
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
261.
R.
(B) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rth
e H
ome
Dep
artm
ent [
2007
]EW
HC
318
6 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion;
asyl
umIm
mig
ratio
nR
ules
Irra
tiona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Yes
No
No
262.
R.
(Cha
vda)
v H
arro
w L
BC[2
007]
EW
HC
306
4 (A
dmin
)Lo
cal
Aut
horit
yA
dult
soci
alca
reN
HS
and
Com
mun
ityC
are
Act
1990
;C
hron
ical
lySi
ck a
ndD
isab
led
Pers
ons A
ct19
70;
Dis
abili
tyD
iscr
imin
atio
n A
ct 1
995
(1)
Con
sulta
tion
was
unl
awfu
l;
(2) F
aile
d to
take
into
acc
ount
Hum
an R
ight
s Act
199
8;
(3) D
id n
ot c
ompl
y w
ithD
isab
ility
Equ
ality
Dut
y un
der
Dis
abili
ty D
iscr
imin
atio
n A
ct19
95;
(4)
Fette
red
disc
retio
n;
(5)
Irra
tiona
lity
Allo
wed
inpa
rt –
grou
nd3
mad
e ou
t.
Gro
unds
1, 2
,4,
5 n
ot m
ade
out.
Yes
No
Poss
ibly
263.
R.
(Wyc
havo
n D
C o
f Civ
icC
entr
e) v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
tefo
r Com
mun
ities
and
Loc
alG
over
nmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C32
09 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Yes
N/A
N/A
264.
Ra
yner
& A
noth
er v
Sec
reta
ryof
Sta
te fo
r the
Hom
eD
epar
tmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C10
28 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Men
tal h
ealth
Men
tal
Hea
lthR
evie
wTr
ibun
al
Rev
iew
con
cern
ing
dela
y in
the
Men
tal H
ealth
Trib
unal
cons
ider
ing
the
R’s
reca
ll to
com
puls
ory
dete
ntio
n by
the
SS.
Allo
wed
inpa
rt –
grou
nd(2
) dec
ided
inR
’s fa
vour
.
Yes
N/A
(HR
cla
im)
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Rul
esA
llege
d th
at (1
) the
rele
vant
prov
isio
ns d
ealin
g w
ithtim
efra
me
for c
onsi
dera
tion
ofre
calls
by
the
tribu
nal w
ere
inco
mpa
tible
with
Art
5(4)
of
ECH
R (2
) R’s
Art
5 rig
hts h
adbe
en v
iola
ted
Dam
ages
issu
ead
jour
ned
–pa
rties
enco
urag
ed to
reso
lve
byne
gotia
tion.
265.
Re
mic
e v
HM
P Be
lmar
sh[2
007]
EW
HC
498
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Hab
eas c
orpu
s.C
rimin
alM
agis
trate
sC
ourt
Act
1980
Illeg
ality
.
Hab
eas c
orpu
s
Allo
wed
.
Hab
eas
Yes
No
No
266.
Re
venu
e an
d C
usto
ms
Com
mis
sion
ers v
Gen
eral
Inco
me
Tax
Com
mis
sion
ers
(Ber
kshi
re) [
2007
] EW
HC
804
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
Tax
Taxe
sM
anag
emen
tA
ct 1
970
App
licat
ion
to q
uash
dec
isio
nsm
ade
by G
ener
al C
omm
issi
oner
spu
rpor
ting
to c
lose
enq
uirie
s by
the
R&
C C
omm
issi
oner
s int
o th
eta
x af
fairs
of 2
indi
vidu
als a
ndth
eir p
artn
ersh
ip.
Allo
wed
.C
omm
issi
oner
had
erre
d in
thei
rco
nstru
ctio
nof
agr
eem
ent
the
effe
ct o
fw
hich
was
not
to c
lose
all
enqu
iries
.D
ecis
ion
quas
hed
and
decl
arat
ion
mad
e as
totru
ein
terp
reta
tion
of a
gree
men
t.
Yes
No
N/A
267.
Ro
nald
Fra
nk M
acle
anN
DPB
App
eal o
f aSo
licito
rs A
ctIr
ratio
nalit
yD
ism
isse
dY
esN
oLo
ss o
f
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Will
iam
son
v Th
e La
w S
ocie
ty[2
007]
EW
HC
125
8 (A
dmin
)pe
nalty
atta
ched
to a
nor
der b
y th
eSo
licito
rsD
isci
plin
ary
Trib
unal
1974
Qua
shin
g or
der
earn
ings
/ab
ility
topr
actic
e
268.
Ru
di &
Ano
ther
v S
ecre
tary
of
Stat
e fo
r the
Hom
eD
epar
tmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C 6
0(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Asy
lum
and
Imm
igra
tion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
es(1
) Jud
icia
l rev
iew
of r
efus
al to
gran
t Ind
efin
ite L
eave
to R
emai
n(I
LR) u
nder
the
Fam
ily IL
Rex
erci
se –
dis
crim
inat
ed a
gain
stun
acco
mpa
nied
min
ors
(diff
eren
tial t
reat
men
t irr
atio
nal)
(2) R
efus
al to
trea
t his
circ
umst
ance
s as f
resh
cla
im –
irrat
iona
l.
(1) D
ism
isse
d
(2) D
ism
isse
d
(1)
No
(2)
No
(1)
No
(2)
No
N/A
269.
Ru
mbo
ld v
Gen
eral
Med
ical
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
569
(Adm
in)
ND
PBM
edic
al,
fitne
ss to
prac
tice
Med
ical
Act
1983
Illeg
ality
App
eal
Dis
mis
sed
270.
S
and
Ors
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for t
he H
ome
Dep
artm
ent
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
654
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Imm
igra
tion
–de
tent
ion
Imm
igra
tion
Rul
es(d
ecis
ion
mad
e un
der
polic
y –
issu
ew
as w
heth
erde
cisi
on w
as
Illeg
ality
(inc
lude
s HR
Arts
5an
d 8)
Allo
wed
;de
clar
atio
ns.
Dam
ages
to b
eas
sess
edse
para
tely
.
Yes
Yes
(len
gth,
two
youn
gch
ildre
n an
d a
youn
g w
oman
,po
or a
pplic
atio
nof
pol
icy,
no
cons
ider
atio
n of
Yes
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
cont
rary
topo
licy
–ho
wev
er ,
the
pow
er to
deta
in is
stat
utor
y)
how
long
dete
ntio
n co
uld
be, a
rt 8
infr
inge
men
t:ba
by d
evel
oped
ricke
ts a
ndbe
cam
ean
aem
ic w
hile
in d
eten
tion)
271.
Sa
tnam
Mill
enni
um L
td v
War
ring
ton
Boro
ugh
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
648
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
App
licat
ion
to q
uash
par
t of
Loca
l Aut
horit
y’s u
nita
ryde
velo
pmen
t pla
n.
Allo
wed
.Y
esN
oN
/A
272.
Sc
anlo
n v
Pens
ions
App
eal
Trib
unal
s &
Ano
ther
[200
7]EW
HC
471
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
sPe
nsio
nsPe
nsio
nsA
ppea
lsTr
ibun
als A
ct19
43.
Dec
isio
n of
Pen
sion
App
eals
Trib
unal
con
cern
ing
S’s w
arpe
nsio
n w
as ir
ratio
nal (
took
into
acco
unt i
rrel
evan
t con
side
ratio
nsan
d di
dn’t
take
into
acc
ount
rele
vant
one
s), p
roce
dura
llyfla
wed
and
in b
reac
h of
Art
6 of
ECH
R.
Allo
wed
.D
ecis
ion
flaw
edbe
caus
eTr
ibun
alap
proa
ched
hear
ing
asbe
ing
one
whi
ch it
was
allo
wed
toqu
ery
entit
lem
ent t
o,as
opp
osed
toth
e ef
fect
s of,
a di
sabl
emen
tfo
r the
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
purp
oses
of
asse
ssm
ent o
fth
e pe
nsio
n.Tr
ibun
al’s
deci
sion
quas
hed.
S’s
appe
al to
be
re-d
eter
min
edby
ano
ther
Trib
unal
.
273.
Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for t
heH
ome
Dep
artm
ent v
AF
[200
7] E
WH
C 6
51 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Terr
oris
m –
cont
rol o
rder
sPr
even
tion
ofTe
rror
ism
Act
200
5
Illeg
ality
(HR
A, u
ltra
vire
s,re
ason
able
ness
, pro
porti
onal
ity),
proc
edur
al im
prop
riety
(HR
A,
cons
ulta
tion)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
Yes
No
(fin
ely
bala
nced
;co
mpl
ex ta
sk in
whi
ch S
SHD
has w
ide
disc
retio
n.C
lear
ly a
lot a
tst
ake
for t
hecl
aim
ant,
how
ever
)
Yes
274.
Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for t
heH
ome
Dep
artm
ent v
AL
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
970
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent.
Crim
e/Te
rror
ism
Prev
entio
n of
Terr
oris
mA
ct 2
005
Rev
iew
of w
heth
er S
S w
rong
tofin
d th
at h
e ha
d re
ason
able
grou
nds f
or su
spec
ted
that
L w
asin
volv
ed in
terr
oris
t rel
ated
activ
ity a
nd a
con
trol o
rder
nece
ssar
y. L
arg
ued
that
ord
erdi
spro
porti
onat
e an
d un
law
ful
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
N/A
275.
Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for t
heC
entra
lD
eten
tion
ofPr
even
tion
ofIll
egal
ity, h
uman
righ
tsA
llow
ed;
Yes
No
No
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t v E
[200
7]EW
HC
233
(Adm
in)
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
terr
oris
tTe
rror
ism
Act
200
5Q
uash
ing
orde
rQ
uash
ing
orde
r (st
ayed
)
276.
Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for t
heH
ome
Dep
artm
ent v
Rid
eh[2
007]
EW
HC
804
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Hum
an ri
ghts
Prev
entio
n of
Terr
oris
mA
ct 2
005
App
eal a
gain
st th
e re
new
al o
f aco
ntro
l ord
er a
nd a
pplic
atio
n fo
rsu
perv
isor
y he
arin
g. A
llege
dbr
each
es o
f hum
an ri
ghts
.
Allo
wed
.O
rder
quas
hed.
Yes
N/A
(HR
cla
im)
N/A
277.
Se
cret
ary
of S
tatu
te fo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t v M
enta
lH
ealth
Rev
iew
Tri
buna
l &O
ther
s [20
07] E
WH
C 2
224
(Adm
in)
Trib
unal
Men
tal H
ealth
Men
tal
Hea
lth A
ct19
83
Rev
iew
of t
ribun
al’s
dec
isio
n to
dire
ct a
def
erre
d co
nditi
onal
disc
harg
e of
a p
atie
nt. C
halle
nge
deci
sion
on
3 gr
ound
s (1)
had
no
pow
er to
impo
se o
ne o
f the
cond
ition
s im
pose
d (2
) dec
isio
nirr
atio
nal (
3) th
ree
of th
eco
nditi
ons c
ould
not
be
law
fully
impo
sed.
Qua
shin
g or
der s
ough
t.
Allo
wed
inpa
rt –
succ
eede
d on
grou
nds (
2)an
d (3
).D
ecis
ion
quas
hed
and
mat
ter
rem
itted
bac
kto
trib
unal
.
Yes
No
No
loss
278.
Se
curi
ty In
dust
ry A
utho
rity
vSt
ewar
t & S
ansa
ra &
Oth
ers
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
338
(Adm
in)
ND
PBLi
cens
ing
Priv
ate
Secu
rity
Indu
stry
Act
2001
5 co
njoi
ned
case
s – in
eac
h th
eSI
A h
ad re
fuse
d to
gra
nt li
cens
eto
indi
vidu
al b
ecau
se, o
n fa
ce o
fit,
app
lican
t dis
qual
ified
by
virtu
e of
ear
lier c
rimin
al o
ffen
ce.
Cou
rt re
quire
d to
det
erm
ine
the
cons
truct
ion
and
appl
icat
ion
ofpr
ovis
ions
in 2
001
Act
and
whe
ther
aut
horit
y ob
liged
tore
fuse
lice
nses
to a
pplic
ants
.C
onsi
dera
tion
of E
CH
R.
Dis
mis
sed.
Art
6, 8
of A
rt 1
Prot
ocol
1 o
fEC
HR
not
enga
ged.
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
279.
Sh
irle
y an
d O
rs v
Cra
btre
e[2
007]
EW
HC
153
2(A
dmin
)Tr
ibun
alA
gric
ultu
ral
tena
ncie
sA
gric
ultu
ral
Hol
ding
s Act
1986
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
280.
Sh
reev
e v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
tefo
r the
Hom
e D
epar
tmen
t[2
007]
EW
HC
243
1 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Dis
cipl
inar
yof
fenc
esPr
ison
Rul
es19
99R
evie
w o
f dec
isio
n th
at th
ecl
aim
ant,
a pr
ison
er, w
as g
uilty
of o
ffenc
e of
hav
ing
anun
auth
oris
ed a
rticl
e in
his
poss
essi
on.
Allo
wed
.D
ecis
ion
quas
hed.
Yes
No
Yes
. S h
adbe
ense
nten
ced
to st
oppa
geof
50%
of
earn
ings
for a
per
iod
of 1
4 da
ys.
281.
Sh
rew
sbur
y &
Atc
ham
Boro
ugh
Cou
ncil
v Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for C
omm
uniti
es a
ndLo
cal G
over
nmen
t [20
07]
EWH
C 2
279
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Loca
lG
over
nmen
tLo
cal A
utho
rity
appl
ied
for
revi
ew o
f SS’
s dec
isio
ns to
proc
eed
to c
onsi
der p
ropo
sals
that
they
be
abol
ishe
d an
dre
plac
ed b
y un
itary
aut
horit
ies.
Loca
l Aut
horit
y’s a
llege
d SS
didn
’t ha
ve p
ower
to in
vite
prop
osal
s, no
r was
it e
ntitl
ed to
find
that
that
satis
fied
the
vario
uscr
iteria
.
Dis
mis
sed.
No
No
N/A
282.
Sh
utta
ri v
The
Law
Soc
iety
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
484
(Adm
in)
ND
PBSo
licito
rs’
prof
essi
onal
cond
uct
Solic
itors
Act
1974
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g
Allo
wed
.
Ord
er q
uash
edan
dde
term
inat
ion
subs
titut
ed.
Yes
No
Yes
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
283.
Si
r Col
in C
hand
ler v
(1)
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te fo
r the
Com
mun
ities
and
Loc
alG
over
nmen
t (2)
Ric
hard
and
Gle
nys M
oore
[200
7] E
WH
C10
00 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
obje
ctio
nTo
wn
and
Cou
ntry
Plan
ning
Act
1990
;Pl
anni
ng(L
iste
dB
uild
ings
and
Con
serv
atio
nA
reas
) Act
1990
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
284.
Si
vills
v G
ener
al S
ocia
l Car
eC
ounc
il [2
007]
EW
HC
257
6(A
dmin
)
ND
PBSo
cial
wel
fare
Gen
eral
Soci
al C
are
Cou
ncil
(Reg
istra
tion)
Rul
es 2
005
App
eal a
gain
st d
ecis
ion
of C
are
Stan
dard
s Trib
unal
that
the
2005
Rul
es e
xclu
ded
C fr
om b
eing
regi
ster
ed a
s a so
cial
car
ew
orke
r. A
lso
soug
ht JR
,cl
aim
ing
that
Trib
unal
sco
nstru
ctio
n of
Rul
es b
reac
hed
Art
14 o
f EC
HR
(rea
d in
conj
unct
ion
wit
Art
2 Pr
otoc
ol1)
.
Dis
mis
sed.
Trib
unal
hadn
’t er
red
inits co
nstru
ctio
n o
rule
s. H
Rcl
aim
als
ore
ject
ed.
Yes
No
N/A
285.
So
le v
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te fo
rTr
ade
and
Indu
stry
and
Oth
ers [
2007
] EW
HC
152
7(A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Com
puls
ory
acqu
isiti
onR
egio
nal
Dev
elop
men
tA
genc
ies A
ct19
98;
Acq
uisi
tion
Illeg
ality
, hum
an ri
ghts
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
Loss
of
secu
rity
ofac
com
mod
atio
n
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
of L
and
Act
1981
286.
So
uth
Cam
brid
gesh
ire
Dis
tric
tC
ounc
il v
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
tefo
r Com
mun
ities
and
Loc
alG
over
nmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C21
17 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Dis
mis
sed
287.
Sr
ama
v D
istr
ict C
ourt
of
Bydg
oszs
z [20
07] E
WH
C 6
66(A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
appe
alEx
tradi
tion
Act
200
3Ill
egal
ity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
Yes
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
288.
Su
mpt
ion
v Lo
ndon
Bor
ough
of G
reen
wic
h [2
007]
EW
HC
2776
(Adm
in)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
,C
ounc
il w
asno
t abl
e to
issu
e a
certi
ficat
e of
law
fuln
ess i
nth
e co
ntex
t of
this
cas
e.
Yes
No
No
289.
Sw
ords
v S
ecre
tary
of S
tate
for
Com
mun
ities
and
Loc
alG
over
nmen
t [20
07] E
WH
C77
1 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Hou
sing
Hou
sing
Act
1985
Rev
iew
of t
he S
S’s d
ecis
ion
togr
ant c
onse
nt to
the
volu
ntar
ytra
nsfe
r of h
ousi
ng e
stat
es b
y th
eLo
cal A
utho
rity
to a
hou
sing
asso
ciat
ion.
S w
as se
cure
tena
nt
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
of a
flat
on
one
of th
e es
tate
s. SS
had
acte
d un
law
fully
in fa
iling
toha
ve re
gard
to/c
onsi
der c
erta
inre
leva
nt fa
ctor
s.
290.
Ta
ylor
v U
SA [2
007]
EW
HC
2527
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
App
eal a
gain
st d
ecis
ion
to se
ndT’
s cas
e to
SS
to c
onsi
der a
requ
est f
or e
xtra
ditio
n.Ex
tradi
tion
wou
ld b
reac
h A
rt 3,
6 an
d 8.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
N/A
N/A
291.
Te
chno
prin
t and
Ano
r v L
eeds
City
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C63
8 (A
dmin
)
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
, pro
cedu
ral
impr
oprie
ty, i
rrat
iona
lity
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
(irra
tiona
lity)
;qu
ashe
d an
dre
mitt
ed
Yes
No
No
loss
292.
Th
e D
istr
ict C
ourt
of V
ilniu
s vBa
rcys
[200
7] E
WH
C 6
15(A
dmin
)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
Qua
shin
g (a
ppea
l)
Dis
mis
sed
(no
juris
dict
ion)
No
No
No
loss
293.
Th
e G
over
nmen
t of C
roat
ia v
Span
ovic
[200
7] E
WH
C 1
770
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
Rem
it to
Dis
trict
Judg
e
Allo
wed
.N
oN
oN
o lo
ss
294.
Th
e Le
arni
ng T
rust
v M
P an
dAn
or [2
007]
EW
HC
163
4(A
dmin
)
Trib
unal
Prov
isio
n fo
rsp
ecia
led
ucat
iona
lne
eds
Educ
atio
nA
ct 1
996
Illeg
ality
(no
evid
ence
,m
isdi
rect
ion,
inad
equa
te re
ason
s)
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
Ord
er q
uash
edan
d re
mitt
ed
No
(loca
lau
thor
ity b
ody
is c
laim
ant)
No
No
loss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
295.
Th
e Se
cret
ary
of S
tate
for
Def
ence
v P
ensi
ons A
ppea
lTr
ibun
al [2
007]
EW
HC
117
7(A
dmin
)
Trib
unal
War
pen
sion
sN
aval
,M
ilita
ry a
ndA
ir Fo
rces
etc
(Dis
able
men
tan
d D
eath
)Se
rvic
ePe
nsio
nsO
rder
198
3
Illeg
ality
, hum
an ri
ghts
Qua
shin
g or
der
Allo
wed
;Q
uash
ing
orde
rs g
rant
edin
resp
ect o
fal
l 8 in
tere
sted
parti
es
Yes
No
(tran
sitio
nal
prov
isio
ns)
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
296.
Tu
rner
v F
irst
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
& A
noth
er [2
007]
EWH
C 2
008
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
; Loc
alA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Hou
sing
Act
1985
Rev
iew
of S
S’s d
ecis
ion
toco
nfirm
a c
ompu
lsor
y pu
rcha
seor
der.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
297.
Tu
via
Ster
n v
The
Gov
ernm
ent
of th
e U
nite
d St
ates
of
Amer
ica
[200
7] E
WH
C 3
266
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
App
eal a
gain
st e
xtra
ditio
nbe
caus
e op
pres
sive
and
unj
ust
Dis
mis
sed
N/A
N/A
N/A
298.
Va
n D
em B
oom
en &
Ano
ther
v As
hfor
d Bo
roug
h C
ounc
il[2
007]
EW
HC
554
(Adm
in)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent;
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
(1) T
own
and
Cou
ntry
Plan
ning
Act
1990
; (2
)N
ot sp
ecifi
ed
(1) D
ecis
ion
of In
spec
tor
refu
sing
pla
nnin
g pe
rmis
sion
proc
edur
ally
flaw
ed. Q
uash
ing
orde
r sou
ght
(2) A
pplic
atio
n fo
r JR
of
Insp
ecto
rs d
ecis
ion
in re
latio
n to
cost
s app
licat
ion
(1) A
llow
ed.
Was
n’t g
iven
suff
icie
ntop
portu
nity
tode
fend
him
self
on p
oint
whi
chin
end
dete
rmin
edap
peal
. Bre
ach
of n
atur
al
(1) Y
es
(2) Y
es (i
fst
atut
ein
volv
ed)
(1)
No
(2)
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
just
ice.
Dec
isio
nqu
ashe
d
(2)
App
licat
ion
refu
sed.
299.
Vi
cara
ge G
ate
Ltd
v Fi
rst
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te [2
007]
EWH
C 7
68 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
App
licat
ion
to q
uash
the
deci
sion
of a
pla
nnin
g in
spec
tor
dism
issi
ng V
’s a
ppea
l aga
inst
the
Loca
l Aut
horit
y’s f
ailu
re to
dete
rmin
e its
pla
nnin
gap
plic
atio
n
Allo
wed
.D
ecis
ion
quas
hed.
Yes
No
N/A
300.
Vr
anic
ki v
Arc
hite
cts
Regi
stra
tion
Boar
d [2
007]
EWH
C 5
06 (A
dmin
)
ND
PBA
rchi
tect
s –pr
ofes
sion
alre
gula
tion
Arc
hite
cts
Act
199
7Pr
oced
ural
impr
oprie
ty (d
elay
,op
portu
nity
to se
e ca
se a
gain
st)
Qua
shin
g (a
ppea
l)
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
301.
W
est L
ondo
n W
aste
Aut
hori
tyv
The
May
or o
f Lon
don
[200
7]EW
HC
757
(Adm
in)
Dev
olve
dA
dmin
istra
tion
Envi
ronm
ent
Gre
ater
Lond
onA
utho
rity
Act
1999
Rev
iew
of d
irect
ions
from
may
orto
W c
once
rnin
g pr
ocur
emen
t of
inci
nera
tion
faci
litie
s for
mun
icip
al w
aste
on
grou
nds t
hat
W's
plan
s not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ithm
unic
ipal
was
te m
anag
emen
tst
rate
gy. W
alle
ged
that
in d
oing
so, t
he m
ayor
had
exc
eede
d hi
sst
atut
ory
pow
ers.
Allo
wed
Dire
ctio
nsqu
ashe
d.
Yes
No
N/A
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
302.
W
este
rn P
ower
Dis
trib
utio
nIn
vest
men
ts v
Cou
ntry
side
Cou
ncil
for W
ales
[200
7]EW
HC
50
(Adm
in)
ND
PBPl
anni
ngW
ildlif
e an
dC
ount
rysi
deA
ct 1
981
Cha
lleng
e to
not
ifica
tion
of a
nar
ea o
f lan
d as
a si
te o
f spe
cial
scie
ntifi
c in
tere
st. D
ecis
ion
irrat
iona
l.
Dis
mis
sed.
Yes
No
N/A
303.
W
ieja
k v
Ols
ztyn
Cir
cuit
Cou
rtof
Pol
and
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
123
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Illeg
ality
(mis
dire
ctio
n)
Qua
shin
g (a
ppea
l)
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
304.
W
illia
ms v
Gen
eral
Med
ical
Cou
ncil
[200
7] E
WH
C 2
603
(Adm
in)
ND
PBM
edic
ine,
fitne
ss to
prac
tice
Med
ical
Act
1983
Illeg
ality
App
eal
Dis
mis
sed
305.
W
inte
r v F
irst
Sec
reta
ry o
fSt
ate
and
Anor
[200
6] E
WH
C49
1 (A
dmin
)
Cen
tral
Gov
ernm
ent
Dep
artm
ent,
Loca
lA
utho
rity
Plan
ning
Tow
n an
dC
ount
ryPl
anni
ng A
ct19
90
Illeg
ality
(fai
lure
to c
onsi
der
rele
vant
con
side
ratio
ns,
inad
equa
te re
ason
s); P
roce
dura
lim
prop
riety
(no
site
vis
it)
Qua
shin
g (a
ppea
l)
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
No
loss
306.
W
olve
rham
pton
City
Cou
ncil
vSp
ecia
l Edu
catio
nal N
eeds
and
Dis
abili
ty T
ribu
nal [
2007
]EW
HC
111
7 (A
dmin
)
Trib
unal
Juris
dict
ion
ofSE
ND
IST
tohe
ar a
n ap
peal
in re
latio
n to
failu
re o
fW
olve
rham
pto
n C
C to
mee
tre
quire
men
ts
Educ
atio
nA
ct 1
996
Illeg
ality
Dis
mis
sed
No
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
307.
W
ood
v C
ity o
f Wes
tmin
ster
Dis
trict
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Illeg
ality
Allo
wed
;Y
esN
oN
o lo
ss
No
Cas
e na
me
with
neu
tral
cita
tion
Typ
e of
resp
onde
nt1
Bro
ad a
rea
ofla
w2
Stat
ute
invo
lved
Gro
unds
for
revi
ew3 a
ndre
med
ies s
ough
t4R
esul
t in
orig
inal
deci
sion
5
Con
ferr
al o
fbe
nefit
6Se
riou
s fau
lt7C
ausa
tion
Mag
istr
ates
Cou
rt [2
007]
EWH
C 2
058
(Adm
in)
Judg
eA
ct 2
003
Qua
shin
g (a
ppea
l)Q
uash
ing
orde
r gra
nted
308.
X
v Y
Scho
ol &
Ors
[200
7]EW
HC
298
(Adm
in)
Loca
lEd
ucat
ion
Aut
horit
y
Dec
isio
n of
head
teac
her t
oex
clud
ecl
aim
ant f
rom
scho
ol d
ue to
Mus
limhe
adw
ear
Hum
an ri
ghts
; leg
itim
ate
expe
ctat
ion;
irra
tiona
lity
Dis
mis
sed
No
stat
ute
No
No
loss
esta
blis
hed
309.
Zi
elin
ski v
Pol
and
[200
7]EW
HC
264
5 (A
dmin
)D
istri
ctJu
dge
Extra
ditio
nEx
tradi
tion
Act
200
3A
ppea
l aga
inst
ext
radi
tion
orde
r.A
llege
d th
at e
xtra
ditio
n w
ould
be o
ppre
ssiv
e be
caus
e of
pas
sage
of ti
me.
Dis
mis
sed
Yes
No
N/A
310.
Zi
gor R
uiz J
aso,
Ana
Isab
elLo
pez,
Inig
o M
aria
Alb
isu
Her
nand
ez v
Cen
tral
Cri
min
alC
ourt
No.
2 M
adri
d [2
007]
EWH
C 2
983
(Adm
in)
Dis
trict
Judg
eEx
tradi
tion
Extra
ditio
nA
ct 2
003
Def
ectiv
e w
arra
ntD
ism
isse
dN
/AN
/AN
/A
