31
Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach DOMESTIC SUBSTANCES LIST Persistent OR Bioaccumulative According to the Regulations Greatest Potential for Human Exposure Persistent OR Bioaccumulative and “Inherently Toxic” to Humans Persistent OR Bioaccumulative and “Inherently Toxic” to non-Human Organisms ENVIRONMENT CANADA SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENT HEALTH CANADA HEALTH CANADA ENVIRONMENT CANADA

Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

  • Upload
    mohawk

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach. DOMESTIC SUBSTANCES LIST. ENVIRONMENT CANADA. HEALTH CANADA. Persistent OR Bioaccumulative According to the Regulations. Greatest Potential for Human Exposure. HEALTH CANADA. ENVIRONMENT CANADA. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

DOMESTIC SUBSTANCES LISTDOMESTIC SUBSTANCES LIST

Persistent OR Bioaccumulative According to the Regulations

Persistent OR Bioaccumulative According to the RegulationsGreatest Potential

for Human Exposure

Greatest Potentialfor Human Exposure

Persistent OR Bioaccumulative and“Inherently Toxic”

to Humans

Persistent OR Bioaccumulative and“Inherently Toxic”

to Humans

PersistentOR Bioaccumulative and

“Inherently Toxic” tonon-Human Organisms

PersistentOR Bioaccumulative and

“Inherently Toxic” tonon-Human Organisms

ENVIRONMENT CANADA

SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENTSCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENT

HEALTH CANADA

HEALTH CANADA ENVIRONMENT CANADA

Page 2: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

PSLNo further action

under this programToxic

(Possible VE)

Outcome of Screening Level Risk Assessments

SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENTS

Page 3: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 4: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Definitions

Page 5: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 6: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 7: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 8: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 9: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Guiding Principles of Water Quality Guidelines:

•Protect all life stages of all species

•All components of ecosystem should be considered

•Recommended guideline is a single maximum value not to be exceeded. This value is based on a long-term no-effect concentration.

•Unless otherwise specified, a guideline refers to the total concentration in an unfiltered sample

Page 10: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 11: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 12: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 13: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

1

10

100

1000

10000W

ater

sed

imen

t

Ph

yto

pla

nkt

on

Mys

ids

Po

nto

po

reia

affi

nis

Olig

och

aete

s

Scu

lpin

Ale

wif

e

Sm

elt

4+R

ain

bo

wTr

ou

t

4+L

ake

Tro

ut

Her

rin

g g

ull

egg

s

Fu

ga

cit

y (

10

-9.P

a)

Connolly, J.P. and Pedersen, C.J. 1988. A thermodynamic-based evaluation of

organic chemical accumulation in aquatic organisms. Environ. Sci. Technol.

22:99-103.

Page 14: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 15: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 16: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Frequency of Adverse Effect Concentrations associated with Cadmium Contaminated Sediments

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0.1 1 10 100 1000

Cadmium Concentration (mg/kg dry weight)

Fre

qu

en

cy

of

Ad

ve

rse

B

iolo

gic

al E

ffe

ct

Ob

se

rva

tio

ns

Page 17: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Frequency of no-effects observations in sediment associated cadmium concentrations

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1

Cadmium Concentration (mg/kg dry weight)

Fre

qu

en

cy

of

No

-Eff

ec

t O

bs

erv

ati

on

s

Page 18: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Threshold Effect Level:

TEL = (1 x 0.0015) = 0.387 mg/kg dry sediment

Threshold Effect Level:

TEL = (1 x 0.0015) = 0.387 mg/kg dry sediment

Threshold Effect Level:

TEL = (1 x 0.0015) = 0.387 mg/kgdry sediment

Page 19: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Frequency of Adverse Effect Concentrations associated with Cadmium Contaminated Sediments

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0.1 1 10 100 1000

Cadmium Concentration (mg/kg dry weight)

Fre

qu

en

cy

of

Ad

ve

rse

B

iolo

gic

al E

ffe

ct

Ob

se

rva

tio

ns

Page 20: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Frequency of no-effects observations in sediment associated cadmium concentrations

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1

Cadmium Concentration (mg/kg dry weight)

Fre

qu

en

cy

of

No

-Eff

ec

t O

bs

erv

ati

on

s

Page 21: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Threshold Effect Level:

TEL = (1 x 0.0015) = 0.387 mg/kg dry sediment

Threshold Effect Level:

TEL = (1 x 0.0015) = 0.387 mg/kg dry sediment

Threshold Effect Level:

TEL = (1 x 0.0015) = 0.387 mg/kgdry sediment

Page 22: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Probable Effect Level:

PEL = (20 x 0.02) = 0.632 mg/kgdry sediment

Page 23: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Frequency of Adverse Effect Concentrations associated with Cadmium Contaminated Sediments

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0.1 1 10 100 1000

Cadmium Concentration (mg/kg dry weight)

Fre

qu

en

cy

of

Ad

ve

rse

B

iolo

gic

al E

ffe

ct

Ob

se

rva

tio

ns

Page 24: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Frequency of no-effects observations in sediment associated cadmium concentrations

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1

Cadmium Concentration (mg/kg dry weight)

Fre

qu

en

cy

of

No

-Eff

ec

t O

bs

erv

ati

on

s

Page 25: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Probable Effect Level:

PEL = (20 x 0.02) = 0.632 mg/kgdry sediment

Page 26: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Threshold Effect Level:

TEL = (1 x 0.0015) = 0.387 mg/kg dry sediment

No Observed Effect Level (NOEL):

NOEL = 0.5 x TEL

= 0.5 x 0.387 = 0.194 mg/kgdry

Page 27: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach
Page 28: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Guidelines for the Protection of Wildlife

TDI = (LOED x NOED)0.5 x Safety Factor

TDI = Tolerable Daily Intake (mg/kg.day)

LOED = Lowest Observed Effects Dose (mg/kg.day)

NOED = No Observed Effects Dose (mg/kg.day)

Page 29: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

TRG = TDI x BW x AF / Food Ingestion Rate

BW = Body Weight (kg)

Food Ingestion Rate (kg/day)

TRG = Tissue Residue Guideline (mg/kg.day)

AF = Appointment Factor

Page 30: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

Probable Effect Level:

PEL = (20 x 0.02) = 0.632 mg/kg dry sediment

Page 31: Categorization of Substances on the DSL: Operational Approach

No Observed Effect Level (NOEL):

NOEL = 0.5 x TEL

= 0.5 x 0.387 = 0.194 mg/kg dry