22
VIRTUAL TEAMS - TUG-OF-WAR: STUDENTS’ ROLES AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT Cassandra Smith, M.Ed.

Cassandra Smith, M.Ed.. Understand different student roles that might emerge in virtual teams. Understand the importance of taking an active role

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

VIRTUAL TEAMS - TUG-OF-WAR:

STUDENTS’ ROLES AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT

Cassandra Smith, M.Ed.

OBJECTIVES Understand different student roles that

might emerge in virtual teams. Understand the importance of taking an

active role as the instructor in virtual teams.

Identify roles and characteristics that influence team dynamics.

Identify conflict strategies that can help resolve issues in virtual teams.

VIRTUAL TEAMS DEFINED O’Leary and Cummings (2007 as cited in

Dube & Robey, 2008) defined virtual teams as an interdependent group of people working towards a common goal while separated by geographic distance, time and/or location.

TEAM SCENARIO You are a manager for the IT

department. Two employees on a team come to you at different times explaining that one employee isn’t contributing to the team work and the other feels as if when he contributes his ideas are not well received. How would you intervene?

COMMENTS – ADULT LEARNERS ON VIRTUAL TEAMS I don’t like virtual teams… I returned to school online to work

independently not to be forced to work in a virtual team…

I do not like my grade contingent upon others…

I do not think it is fair that some students have to submit most of the work when other members slack…

I do not feel a strong instructor presence when conflicts arise…

COMMENTS – ADULT LEARNERS ON VIRTUAL TEAMS Leadership Assess skills (patience, organization) Goal setting (accountable/deadlines) Project management (guide/set

timelines) Collaborative learning (relinquish

personal agendas) Critical thinking (logical thought

processes)Side note: Qualitative and Quantitative data

TEAM ROLES The Aggressive Role The Passive Role The Slacker Role The I’ll Do It Role

AGGRESSIVE ROLE Aggressive role – person who exhibits

this role wants to do the majority of the assignment (control the assignment) or tells everyone else what to do on the team. He or she is more of a dominator on the team than innovator especially if no one has responded.

Maybe you should do it! You are only compiling the assignment.

TINA’S PROJECT Example

Assignment: Instructional Plan Team A consists of Tina, Jerry, San, and Bob Tina sends an email to the team forum and says

she thinks the team should do an Instructional Plan on “How to give a Creative Presentation”

The team agrees. Tina completes the assignment. Everything

is complete except the conclusion, and she sends a message to the team saying someone else on the team can add the finishing touches.

PASSIVE ROLE Passive role – a person

who exhibits this role on the team waits for everyone else to respond before selecting an assignment section. He or she will not volunteer.

SLACKER ROLE Slacker Role – a

person who exhibits this role on the team does little to help the team. He has no time for team assignments…

I’LL DO IT I’ll Do It Role – a person who exhibits

this role on the team fulfills several responsibilities on the team and volunteers -and will do any part of the assignment when no one else on the team wants to work or volunteers.

He carries the brunt of the team projects.

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT

CONFLICT DEFINED Conflict is defined as “An expressed

struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce rewards and interference from the other party in achieving their goals” Hocker and Wilmont (1992).

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT DEFINED Conflict management involves executing

resolution and includes the principle that all conflicts cannot necessarily be resolved, but learning how to manage conflicts can decrease the odds of nonproductive escalation (Bakhare, 2010).

CONFLICT ISSUES Miscommunication Student inconsistency Student work ethics Lack of reading Unclear assignment instruction Not enough sections to write for

assignments

Dyad: Have students work in class in the team assigned section

CONFLICT ISSUES Preparation Conflict (slow start, unclear

instructions, duplicated sections, leader confusion (Volunteering someone)

Leadership Conflict (dominator versus innovator, same person lead - other team members not volunteering, changing assignment)

Withdrawal Conflict (male versus female scenarios, or students not fully participated because of conflict, plagiarizing part of the work)

EDUCATOR ACTION STEPS Instructor Must take an Active Role

Monitor (often, 3x a day)Weekly Check-in (email or message

thread worth points) Intervene (send message)Team Document (guidelines, assignment

sections)Assign a team leader (to compile the

assignment)Team Agreement (ground rules, meetings)Grade (specific individual team feedback)Syllabus Alert

AccountabilityModel the behavior

WHAT WORKS FOR ME Intervene Reinforce Post messages Syllabus alert Team document

Well, maybe not that angry!

This is much better!

JOHN & SRIVASTAVA - FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS Extraversion Agreeableness Conscientiousne

ss Neuroticism Openness

Individual is talkative, full of energy, and emotionally expressive

Individual is helpful and unselfish with others,

Individual does a thorough job, is reliable

Individual is tense worries more than others

Individual is original curious about many things, and inventive

John & Srivastava, 1999 as cited in Jacques, Garger, Brown, & Deale.

MY CONTACT INFORMATION Cassandra Smith, M.Ed. [email protected] Follow me on Twitter: CjdistanceEdu and FirstNovel Author of books: Who Let this Disaster in My Classroom Ethical Behavior in the E-Classroom Both Available on Amazon.com

REFERENCES Bakhare, R. (2010). The Manager and Conflict Management.

SCMS Journal of Indian Management. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Dube, L., & Robey, D. (2008). Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. Information Systems, 19. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Hocker, J.L., & Wilmot, W.W. (1991). Interpersonal conflict. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown. Retrieved from Conflict Management for Teams. http://www.uni.edu/riedmill/conflict_article.htm

Jacques P.H., Garger, J., Brown, C.A., & Deale, C.S. (2009). Personality and virtual reality team candidates: The roles of personality traits, technology anxiety and trust as predictors of perceptions of virtual reality teams. Journal of Business and Management,15(2). Retrieved from EBSCOhost.