IW: LEARN Case study:The Mekong

Wetlands Biodiversity Programme

Peter-John MeynellUNDP Team Leader 20 November 2004

Outline of presentation

• Overview of project and its activities

• Environmental flows• Economic valuation • Financing mechanisms

Limitations of this presentation

• Mekong Wetlands Programme is only just starting – July 04

• Just learning how to make it work• Little actual experience to report

BUT:

• Environmental flows• Economic valuation • Development of financing

mechanismsare MWBP significant components

What is the programme about?

Based upon the principle that conservation can only be achieved through promotion of sustainable use of wetland resources

Goal• Conservation and Sustainable Use of

Wetland Biodiversity in the Lower Mekong Basin

Purpose• To strengthen regional, national and

local capacities for conservation and sustainable use of wetlands in the Lower Mekong Basin

What do we aim to do?

- Address the root causes of wetland loss and

degradation1. Encourage multi-sector planning at national and regional level

2. Strengthen wetland policy and economic frameworks

3. Collect information and increase awareness about importance of wetlands and threats

4. Build human capacity and strengthen technical resources

5. Use four sustainable resource use demonstration projects – one per country

Programme Components

• Regional component •  4 National components

Cambodia, Lao PDR, Thailand and Vietnam

•  4 Demonstration sites

Songkhram

Attepeu

Stoeng Treng

Plain of Reeds

Demonstration sites

How do we do this?

At regional level• Development of guiding principles for wetland

conservation and sustainable use – reaching agreement and acceptance by the four governments

• Environmental flows – testing scenarios for the impacts of flow regimes upon wetlands and livelihoods

• Biodiversity assessments and mapping in support of regional and national planning

• Flagship species – Irrawaddy Dolphin, Siamese Crocodile, Mekong Giant Catfish, Sarus Crane

• Support to international conventions – Ramsar, CITES, CBD

How do we do this?

At national level• Strengthening networks of

national expertise• Support to Ramsar Convention• Recommendations for sectoral

policies• National Wetland Action Plan

development, review and implementation

• Raising awareness amongst decision makers

How do we do this?

At demonstration site level• Wetland management planning,

strengthening the provincial process• Community-based management of

wetland resources• Enhancing sustainable livelihoods• Economic valuation and development

of financing mechanisms for sustainable wetland management

• Communications, education and training of national, provincial and community organisations

Environmental flows

• Moving away from simplisitic concepts of minimum flow requirements, even at different times of year

• Developing an understanding of what flows are required for different ecological and livelihood functions

Environmental flows – process 1

• The MRC Water Utilization Programme has developed a hydrological model of the Lower Mekong Basin which can predict the flow consequences of development scenarios.

• Development scenarios include:– Higher development scenario– Lower development scenario– Present day scenario

• These scenarios have implications for flows in the river, generally:– Higher dry season flows– Lower wet season flows– Changes in frequency of flooding levels

Environmental flows – process 2

• Using the adapted DRIFT techniques developed in South Africa

• Identify the key assets in terms of:– River geomorphology, – Ecosystem functions– Biodiversity, – Natural resources, - fisheries, vegetation – Livelihoods.

• Carry out field studies on the Mekong mainstream – find out asset locations in relation to river

and flooding levels – accurate height range measurements for

these assets are critical

Back Dynamic

Tree -Shrub

Lower Dynamic

Upper

lower Wet Bank

Aquatic

580

300200120

400

8050

Q

1:20

1:2

IV

II, III

Vegetation zones linked to flood - return periods

Environmental flows – process 3

• Predict consequences of the different scenarios

• Use valuation to show economic and social consequences

• Feed the information into the Basin and national planning processes

• Ensure development decisions are made with better awareness of the consequences and trade-offs

Environmental flows - learning

• Process is about capacity building– Dialogue between riparian countries

to develop common understanding of scenarios and assets

– Teams of national experts will carry out the studies, guided by international experts

– Interpretation of the consequences as a learning experience

Wetland valuation• Show that wetland resources and

functions have real values– Fish for subsistence and commercial

value– Wetland products – rice, algae, medicinal

plants, frogs, snails, insects, building materials etc

– Functions such as flood regulation, groundwater recharge, water purification, habitat for spawning and breeding

• Use these values in planning and EIAs to highlight losses & trade-offs

Wetland valuation – learning and guiding

• Research and training to expand capacity to incorporate economic values into Environmental Impact Assessments in LMB countries.

• Less formal training – more on-the-job continuous involvement of key staff of MWBP with government and NGO partners

• Assessing market potential for wetland based or non-wetland alternative income generating activities to guide the MWBP in livelihood activities

• e.g. silk rearing in rural communities in Stoeng Treng

Ecotourism for the Irrawaddy Dolphin

• Potential development of ecotourism to protect Irrawaddy dolphin population – need to understand livelihood impacts of tradeoffs

faced by local communities.

• What is the cost to local fishermen of giving up certain fishing activities that endanger the dolphin?

• If local communities give up fishing activities which endanger dolphins, who will reap the benefits from tourism dollars?

• What institutional arrangements are needed to ensure that those who bear the costs of dolphin management also benefit?

Financing mechanisms

• Economic valuation should not stop here: it is a tool to contribute to:– Policy review and development – Economic incentives– Financing mechanisms for improving and sustaining long-term wetland

resource management

• MWBP is developing a strategy for these in each country

• Examples include:– Financing for Ramsar site management – Financing for Community fishery management in

Stoeng Treng

Financing for Community fishery management in Stoeng

Treng

• Possible to assess costs, benefits and distribution of Community Fishery Management – comparing CFM and non-CFM - but not very easy

• Partial valuation of wetland resources indicates need to consider alternative livelihood strategies

• Build qualitative evidence:– Many stakeholders that benefit from wetland

resources – on and off-site– Interactions between stakeholders influence

how resource is used and best managed– Extent of power relations and influence

between these stakeholders

Economic valuation and financing mechanism –

lessons learnt• Important to relate economic

valuation to the context

• Define the issue to be addressed clearly

• Question need for comprehensive evaluation – target studies carefully

Economic valuation and financing mechanism –

lessons learnt

• Need for back-up information from other disciplines – hydrology, ecology, fisheries, livelihood etc.

• Consider relation to policy and planning needs

• Need to pull in other sectors, including Ministries of Finance and Trade