Upload
others
View
26
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Case Study: Composites Technology Research Malaysia Sdn Bhd (CTRM)
Industry Challenge
Composites Technology Research Malaysia Sdn Bhd (CTRM) is part of the global
supply chain in Composites Aero structures for major commercial and military
aircraft manufacturers in the world. The company plays a strategic role in the
Aerospace and Composites industries and has also diversified its business into
composites aircraft interiors, aircraft seats and transportations.
As part of the production process, the company is required to run thorough
physical tests on each of the components that it manufactures to ensure that they
meet the stringent standards. This is especially true in the case of components
made of composite materials. In order to guarantee that the testing process is
extremely meticulous and accurate, each component needs to undergo the
required scans/tests from all possible angles. This means that each component
needs to be flipped over by 180 degrees, rotated etc. to ensure that each portion
of this component is accessible to the scanning machines and also to guarantee
that all data and measurements are physically captured and recorded.
Flipping these components can be quite a challenging process, especially since
some of them such as the aircraft fan cowl can weigh upwards of 70 kilograms.
Flipping these is not easy even if there are 5 persons deployed to physically flip each
part.
Doing it manually can damage the product since there is a possibility that it might
get dropped or might touch or scratch some surface thereby damaging the part.
Since these parts are not ergonomically designed to be held or flipped, they can be
quite unwieldy. Yet, testing and certification of each component before it is sent to
the OEM is extremely important.
The company was keen to mechanise the process by designing a ‘flipper’ device
that could be used to physically flip the components as required for testing.
Flipping large composite part 180°
First design concept too costly to fabricate
Optimising Design for a Flipper for Airplane Components in Production
MSC Software | CASE STUDY
The team first attempted to build a flipper device using a generic open
source software to design it. While the software had only some basic
functionalities to enable the design concept, it fell short on several counts.
Therefore, the initial version was designed based on the open source
software and hand calculations. It had four pneumatic actuators for
flipping, two motors for up-down sliding, two counter-balancers at both
sides of the flipper to reduce actuator load, and four magnetic clamps.
The design had several issues and was not optimal. It had too many
actuators, making it costly to fabricate. It also had unnecessary
redundant motors, which not only raised the cost, but threw up issues
around asynchronous motion.
For the next iteration, the load from Adams was analysed using Patran
and MSC Nastran to calculate the various stresses as well as reserve
factors for all the stresses. There were four types of stressors - Tensile,
Compressive, Local buckling and Crippling - that needed to be analysed,
and each of them had a pass/fail test. Using inputs from this analysis, the
third concept was developed with variations such as a flipping pivot line
close to the Centre of Gravity (CG) of the part in order to reduce the
movement of the arm and provide greater support. This also helped to
improve stability and avoid use of magnetic clamps. The team also used
hinges to further improve the design.
Using a combination of the multibody dynamics simulation with Adams, Patran for pre/post-processing for Finite Element Analysis (FEA), finally MSC Nastran for FEA, the team was able to build a highly optimized design with a high factor of safety. In fact, the factor of safety in the third iteration saw an improvement of 23x over the second one. Not only was it functionally satisfactory and structurally sound, it weighed 15 percent lesser than the first iteration.
At the same time, the design helped save on cost of materials and helped prevent redundancy.
The team then designed a second concept using Adams, a multibody
dynamics simulation software on the .OBJ files imported from the open
source software. Connectors were applied between moving parts and
motions were applied on counter-balancers and actuators. In addition,
contacts were applied between the flipper and actuator arms to verify
forces in the actuation components. This helped confirm that the
actuation force in the pneumatic actuator was enough to lift the required
load.
The second concept was a definite improvement over the first one on
many counts. Instead of two motors in the first design, the redundancy
had been eliminated in the second concept, with only one motor for
up-down sliding with the gearbox. Also, the second concept had only two
pneumatic actuators for flipping.
Benefits
Key Highlights:
Product: Adams, MSC Nastran, Patran
Industry: Aerospace
Challenge: To design a flipper device to flip components that are under production for the purpose of testing them at different angles etc.
Solution: Multibody dynamics with Adams, MSC Nastran, and Patran to create an optimum flipper design.
For more information on MSC Nastran and for additional Case Studies, please visit: www.mscsoftware.com/en-indopacific/product/msc-nastran
CTR*2019SEP*CS
Second design concept with adequate room for improvement
Third Design Concept
Second design concept with adequate room for improvement
©2019 MSC Software is part of Hexagon (Nasdaq Stockholm: HEXA B), a global leader in sensor, software and autonomous solutions. Learn more at hexagon.com and follow us @HexagonAB. The MSC Software corporate logo, MSC, and the names of the MSC Software products and services referenced herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of the MSC Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates in the United States and/or other countries. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners. All rights reserved.
MSC Solution