Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
1
Foundation Training
Intertribal Child Welfare Training Partnership
1
Day 1 Agenda ‐
Introductions Historical Trauma Cultural Competence with American Indian Familes
Introduction to ICWA/WICWA Identification of Indian Children Applicability
2
Day 2 Agenda
Notification
Emergency Removals
Placement Preferences
Active Efforts
Serious Damage & Qualified Expert Witness
Case Application
Collaboration with American Indian Tribes
3
1
2
3
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
2
Introductions Name
Agency/Job Title
How long have you worked in child welfare?
Do you have any ICWA/WICWA Experience?
4
5
Losses Exercise
Write one item on each card of something that is very precious to you.
Items can include names of family members/loved ones, family heirlooms/keepsakes, material items, or more abstract items like one’s religion, cultural identity, or other form of identification.
6
4
5
6
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
3
Symptoms/features of unresolved historical trauma
Depression
Suicidal ideation and behavior
Substance Abuse
Guilt and concern about betraying the ancestors for being excluded from the suffering
Mistrust of members of the dominate culture
Obligation to share in the ancestral pain(Duran et al, 1998)
7
Tiers of Trauma
8
Tiers of Trauma
Tier One: Colonialism
Both European and U.S. Federal policies aim to either assimilate or annihilate American Indian people
Tribal governments not able to act independently
9
7
8
9
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
4
European Conquest: 1492‐1789
Columbus “discovers” America where at least 10 to 12 million American Indians are residing
Europeans use this “discovery” as justification to begin to claim land occupied by American Indians
10
Pre‐Reservation: 1789‐1871
Inherent Tribal Sovereignty Recognized
Sovereignty is a legal principle that refers to the rights of American Indian Nations to govern themselves and their land base
11
Pre‐Reservation: 1789‐1871 First treaties are made with Tribes
Signed legal agreements between Federal and Tribal governments
Made provisions for special peace, alliance, trade and land rights
Established Tribe’s equivalent status to that of Federal government
12
10
11
12
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
5
Pre‐Reservation: 1789‐1871 Policies are aimed to remove the “Indian problem”
Indian Removal Act of 1830 Trail of Tears: Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole people forcibly moved to Oklahoma
Indian Appropriation Act of 1854 Authorized establishment of reservations
The Homestead Act of 1862 Authorized granting Indian land to settlers
13
Tiers of Trauma Tier Two: Socioeconomic and Political Dependence on the U.S. Government
No longer allowed to live as sovereign nations
Forbidden to act without approval of U.S. Government
U.S. Policies in place to exterminate American Indians
Displacement from tribal lands to reservations
14
Allotment & Assimilation: 1871‐1928
Policies aim to create dependence on U.S. Government & assimilate Indians
The Dawes Act moved American Indians from communal living to individual ownership
Blood quantum was established as a way to formulate tribal rolls
The Citizen Act of 1924 made all American Indians full U.S. citizens
15
13
14
15
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
6
Tiers of Trauma Tier Three: Boarding Schools
American Indian children suffering various forms of abuse
Substance abuse in parents as a result of their loss and trauma
Repeated acts of genocide by U.S. Government by removing American Indian children from their families
16
17
The philosophy of the Boarding School Movement as stated by the 1886 Commissioner of Indian Affairs:
“If you want to solve the Indian problem you can do it in one generation. You can take all of the children of school age and move them bodily out of Indian country and transport them to some other part of the United States where there are civilized people. If you take these kids away and educate them to make their own lives, they wouldn’t come back here.”
(Adams, 1995)
Boarding School Movement
Children as young as 6 subjected to:
Denial of contact with their families
Forced to cut their hair
Forced to adopt Christianity as their religion
Forbidden to speak their native language
Forced to adopt a new European name
18
16
17
18
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
7
Discuss: What losses did the children experience at the boarding schools?
What impact could the boarding school experience have on children as they grew into adults?
19
Trauma, Separation, and Loss Experiences
Separation from families; cut off from families –couldn’t go home for first few years
Train ride to Carlisle – not knowing what to expect
Little to eat; different food to eat
Given new names; loss of identity
Given new clothes – old ones taken away
Forbidden to use spiritual practices and native language
20
Tiers of Trauma Tier Four: Current Cumulative Effects of Trauma on Native Communities
Child physical and sexual abuse
Family violence
Accidental deaths
Suicide
Depression
Substance Abuse(Gagne, 1998)
21
19
20
21
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
8
22
Appreciating Differences Exercise
Spend a few minutes discussing how your assigned family tradition “looks” in your family
Generate a list of the traditions you appreciate and value from this discussion
Flipchart and report back to large group
23
Children & Families Larger definition of extended family
Many adults often involved in decision‐making regarding children
Children seen as essential building blocks of community
All members of extended family and community responsible for rearing each child
Common for children to be cared for by extended family members for long periods of time
24
22
23
24
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
9
Child Development & Learning Children receive more respect and equal status
Children allowed to develop more freely and urged toward self‐determination
Teach through observation, role modeling and storytelling
25
Discipline
Traditionally, corporal forms of punishment did not exist
Shaming and role modeling were used to help children learn what they did wrong and how to correct it
Contact with the dominant culture has contributed to a loss of traditional ways of discipline and generational cycles of child abuse
26
Cooperation Harmony with others is extremely important
Personal orientation (social harmony) is more important than task orientation
Respect for an individual's dignity and autonomy
People are not meant to be controlled and one does not interfere in the affairs of another
27
25
26
27
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
10
Generosity
Sharing is greatly valued
Individual ownership exists but is not given prominence
Stinginess is a trait that is discouraged
28
Saving
Value is not seen in amassing large quantities of goods (e.g., household possessions, saving accounts, life insurance policies, etc.)
In the past, nature’s bounty provided food, clothing, and shelter
29
Time
Indians view time as flowing rather that as something one can control
In the past, only natural phenomena like the sun, the moon, and the seasons were used to mark the passage of time
30
28
29
30
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
11
Courtesy Belief in polite, courteous behavior toward others
The avoidance of direct eye contact is based on the desire not to be rude
Speak soft, slow and deliberate—stressing the feelings rather than the words
Mask feelings of discomfort and will observe silently to inwardly determine what is expected of them
Convey feelings through behavior rather than words
Traditionally, criticism is communicated indirectly through another person or through non‐verbal signs
31
Aging
Value wisdom that comes from age and experience
The family unit is close and discourages attempts to separate older family members from the rest of the family
Since the family is a strong unit there is not a problem with generation gap
32
Spiritualism
Spirituality pervades all areas of life
Do not believe in forcing their beliefs on others
Silence is highly valued
33
31
32
33
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
12
Values Exercise
Select a group member to take notes and report out to the large group
Utilizing your group’s assigned value, discuss how you are likely to see the value in your work with American Indian families – generating 3‐5 examples
Share with large group
34
Essential Values for Culturally Competent Practice with American Indians
Helper wellness and self‐awareness
Humility and a willingness to learn
Respect, open‐mindedness and a non‐judgmental attitude
A social justice orientation
35
Building a Culturally Responsive Foundation
Seek out information on the client’s culture and the client’s understanding of their culture
Cultural self‐examination
Confront personal biases and prejudices
Develop proficiency in such skills such as openness, trust, and positive communication
Be aware of underlying cultural assumption in assessment tools
36
34
35
36
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
13
37
Indian Adoption Project
Collaborative project between BIA & Child Welfare League of America
395 Indian children placed for adoption with non‐Indian families
Poverty cited as a reason to break up Indian families
38
Leading up to the ICWA
By the 1960s, there was recognition that Indian families were being broken apart at an alarming rate due to state social service departments removing children and placing them in non‐Indian homes.
Even after the Indian Adoption Project officially ended, premise continued that Indian children are better off growing up non‐Indian Child welfare workers often misinterpreted material poverty as sufficient grounds for removal
39
37
38
39
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
14
Leading up to the ICWA 1969 & 1974 Association on American Indian Affairs Studies
• 25‐35% of all Indian children were separated from their families, placed in foster homes, adoptive homes or institutions.
• The national rate of removal for Indian children was 25 times higher than non‐Indian children
• In Wisconsin, the risk of an Indian child being separated from his or her family was 1600 times higher than for non‐Indian child.
• More than 17% of school aged Indian children from reservations were living in institutional facilities.
• 85% of all Indian children in foster homes were in non‐Indian homes.
40
Association on American Indian Affairs
Conclusion of 1969 & 1974 StudiesOnly 1% were removed because of abuse. 99% were based on “neglect” or “social deprivation.”
Examples of “neglect” or “social deprivation” –
An Indian reservation was deemed an unsuitable place to rear a child
Adoptive parents were seen as being able to provide a better home Family sending children to tribal school rather than public school Mother was being “indiscreet” Poverty, poor housing, lack of modern plumbing, overcrowding Alcohol abuse, applied against Indian parents where it was not
applied against non‐Indian parents
41
AAIA Findings on Removal Methods
“Voluntary” placement or waivers of parental rights
− Signed by parents, without any explanation of the meaning and then used as evidence of neglect and grounds for TPR
Fraud
Carried out without due process
Rarely represented by counsel
Rarely supporting testimony by expert witnesses
42
40
41
42
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
15
Other Findings of AAIA Studies
Responsible tribal authorities and Indian community agencies not being consulted or informed when children were being removed
Public officials involved were unfamiliar with, and often disdainful of, Indian culture and society.
Children with Indian custodians rather than parents had even fewer protections.
43
44
Purpose To protect the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families
Prevent the unwarranted breakup of American Indian families
Recognize tribal jurisdiction to make custody decisions involving the removal of Indian children
Establish minimum federal standards that county and/or state courts must follow when Indian children are removed from their homes for foster care, TPR, pre‐adoption, or adoption
We had ICWA, Why WICWA?Problems identified with Wisconsin compliance, particularly Identification and Notice:
2004 CFSR
eWiSACWIS
WI Children’s Court Improvement Program data
Reports by the Tribes themselves
45
43
44
45
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
16
WICWA
Clarifies the requirements of ICWA
Places the procedures in Wisconsin law
46
Tribal Sovereignty The U.S. government and the Tribes have a government‐to‐government relationship that is unique in the world system of governments.
Each tribe listed in the federal register is a separate political entity and must be recognized and addressed as a separate political entity, government to government.
47
“Indian” DesignationThe designation of “Indian” by the federal government refers to a political status, rather than a racial status.
It recognizes that an Indian person is a member of a sovereign political entity ‐‐ of a tribe.
An Indian person is, in effect, a person with dual citizenship.
48
46
47
48
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
17
Tribal Sovereignty and WICWA The tribe must be notified of all Indian child/juvenile custody proceedings.
The tribe has the right to formally intervene at any point during the proceeding and become a party to the case. Call witnesses & Present recommendations Examine all reports and documents filed with the court Tribe does not need to be represented by an attorney WICWA still applies even if the Tribe decides not to intervene in the case
Tribal courts have jurisdiction over Indian child /juvenile custody proceedings.
49
Intent of WICWA Prevent the unwarranted removal of an Indian child from his or her home
Prevent an Indian child’s separation from the tribe, and
Facilitate a child’s relationship with his or her tribe
50
Responsibility for WICWA
Who has major responsibility to see that WICWA and its intent are fulfilled?
*The Petitioning Child Welfare Agency*
51
49
50
51
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
18
Best Interests of an Indian ChildWisconsin policy requires court and agencies responsible for child [juvenile] welfare to do all of the following:
Cooperate fully with Indian tribes to ensure that [ICWA] is enforced in this state
Protect the best interests of Indian children and promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families
52
WICWA applies when:
the child is an Indian child, and
the child is the subject of a legal proceeding or action governed by WICWA
53
Photo Credits: First People Website
54
52
53
54
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
19
Identification of Indian Children
Successful implementation of WICWA is dependent upon early and accurate identification of Indian children.
Who initiates the process to identify Indian children?
The Petitioning AgencyAsk as early as possible!
55
Access Report
Agencies must provide notice to the appropriate tribe of all screened‐in or screened‐out CPS Reports received about an Indian child
The notice must be made within 24 hours from the receipt of the report by fax, phone, or email
Include the eWiSACWIS case I.D.
The CPS Report must be sent as part of the notice for the Menominee Nation
56
The ICWA Record – Access Report
57
55
56
57
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
20
Forms to Use For IdentifyingIndian Children
Screening for Child’s Status as Indian Form At Every CPS primary caregiver initial assessment
When child is taken into custody
Child’s Biological Family History Form
Request for Confirmation of Child’s Indian Status Form
All of these forms are found in the ICWA Record in eWiSACWIS
58
The ICWA Record – Screening Tab
The ICWA Record – Family History Tab
58
59
60
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
21
The ICWA Record – Request for Confirmation
The ICWA Record – Request for Confirmation
Identification of Indian Children
Screening
A child may still be a member or eligible for membership in a tribe, even if adopted by a non‐Indian person.
An adult may be a member of a tribe, even if adopted by a non‐Indian as a child, and his or her child could also be a member or eligible for membership.
63
61
62
63
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
22
SummaryIdentification of Indian Children
Your responsibility is to:
Initiate the process promptly
Gather sufficient information
Contact the tribes
Ensure eWiSACWIS data is updated and complete
64
SummaryIdentification of Indian Children
If the initial screening does not raise any possibility of the child being Indian:
Proceed with the Case
Continue to ask family members about possibility of Indian Heritage
65
2016 Federal Regulations If you have reason to know that the child may be
Indian, you must report to the court the due diligence you made in determining child’s Indian status.
Proceed as though it is a WICWA case until it is determined otherwise on the court record
66
64
65
66
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
23
Photo Credits: Father and Son Retreat 2010 Stockbridge-Munsee Mohican News
67
Definition of Indian ChildAn Indian child is:
a member of an Indian tribe, or
eligible for membership and the biological child of a member of an Indian tribe
68
Definition of Indian Tribe Any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community of Indians, including any Alaska native village, which is recognized as eligible for the services provided to Indians by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior because of Indian status.
As of 2018, there are 573 federally‐recognized tribes.
69
67
68
69
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
24
Tribal Membership
Membership and eligibility for membership are determined by the tribe.
A determination by a tribe is not advisory; it is definitive.
Membership criteria differ from tribe to tribe.
Membership is not the same as enrollment.
70
Indian Child/Juvenile Custody Proceeding
Includes: CHIPS proceedings (s. 48.13) A JIPS proceeding based on a petition that the youth is: uncontrollable habitually truant from school a school drop‐out habitually truant from home
Termination of Parental Rights proceedings Guardianship proceedings Any child custody proceeding in which a parent cannot have a child returned upon demand
71
Proceedings and Actions NOT Governed by WICWA Proceeding based on a petition that the child has committed a delinquent act
Placement of a child with one of the parents through a divorce proceeding
Placements or involuntary commitments under Chapter 51
72
70
71
72
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
25
Definition of Parent
For purposes of applying WICWA, a “parent” is:
A biological parent
An Indian person who has adopted an Indian child, including adoption under tribal law or custom
An Indian husband who has consented to artificial insemination of his wife
73
Definition of Parent, cont. In the case of a nonmarital child who is not adopted and whose parents do not subsequently intermarry, a person:
Acknowledged under Wisconsin or other state’s law or under tribal law or custom to be the biological father, or
Adjudicated to be the biological father
Does not include any person whose parental rights have been terminated
74
Definition of Indian Custodian
An “Indian custodian” is an Indian person:
Who has legal custody of an Indian child under tribal law or custom or under state law, or
To whom temporary physical care, custody, and control has been transferred by the parent of the child
75
73
74
75
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
26
Voluntary Placements & Voluntary TPRs
Any such consents must be:• Executed in writing
• Recorded before a judge
• Accompanied by a written certificate by the judge that:
– the terms and consequences of the consent were fully explained, and
– the parent or Indian custodian fully understood
• Any consent given prior to or within 10 days after birth of the Indian child is not valid.
• Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. § 1913 (a)
76
77
Withdrawal of Consent: Voluntary TPR
Parent may withdraw consent
for any reason
at any time
Prior to entry of final TPR order
Child must be returned
Unless an order or agreement that was in effect prior to the TPR provides for a different placement
78
76
77
78
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
27
Withdrawal of ConsentPost‐Final TPR Order
• After a voluntary TPR, a parent may withdraw consent if obtained through fraud or duress.• Motion must be filed within 2 years after the order granting the adoption.
• If court finds fraud or duress, court mustvacate the TPR and adoption orders and return the Indian child to the parent• Unless an order or agreement that was in effect prior to the TPR provides for a different placement.
79
Photo Credits: First People Website
80
Formal Notice
Notice must be sent to:
the Indian child’s parent
the Indian custodian, if any, and
the tribe in which the Indian child is a member, or
the tribe or tribes in which the Indian child may be eligible for membership, or
if the child’s tribe is not known, the Bureau of Indian Affairs
81
79
80
81
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
28
Formal Notice The notice of the first hearing in an involuntary Indian child/juvenile custody proceeding must be sent by registered mail, return receipt requested.
The return receipt must be filed with the court.
Copies of the initial notices sent to the parents, tribe, and Indian custodian must be sent to the BIA Midwest Regional office by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.
Subsequent notices can be sent regular mail
82
Initial NoticeNotice of Involuntary Child Custody Proceeding Involving an Indian Child Form
Must be used instead of standard hearing notice because it includes the information required under WICWA
The copy sent to the tribe (or BIA) must include the following forms, unless they have already been sent:
◦ Screening◦ Biological Family History
◦ Request for Confirmation
Petition must be included
83
The ICWA Record ‐ Notice
84
82
83
84
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
29
The ICWA Record ‐ Notice
85
The ICWA Record ‐ Notice
86
Initial Hearing May not be held until 10 days after parent, Indian custodian, and tribe receive the notice
May not be held until 15 days after BIA receives notice if parent or tribe is unknown
The court must grant an additional 20 days for preparation upon the request of the:
Parent Indian custodian Tribe
87
85
86
87
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
30
88
Emergency Removals: Exclusive Jurisdiction WICWA does not prevent an agency from removing and placing an Indian child who is:
A resident of or domiciled on a reservation,
Temporarily located off the reservation, and
Who is in danger of imminent physical damage or harm
89
Emergency Removals: Concurrent Jurisdiction The child is not residing or domiciled on a reservation
CHIPS/JIPS Proceeding will be initiated in county court
Tribe may still choose to transfer to tribal court
90
88
89
90
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
31
Emergency RemovalsCourt must promptly hold a hearing and make a finding on the record that emergency placement/removal is necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child.
An emergency placement must be terminated immediately when it is no longer necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child by:
Initiating child custody proceeding (i.e., CHIPS) subject to the provisions of ICWA,
Transferring the child to jurisdiction of the tribe, or
Restoring child to parent or Indian custodian.
91
When Indian Child is Taken Into Emergency Custody Emergency hearing is not considered a child/juvenile custody proceeding
Hearing can be held before 10 days
Formal notification to the tribe by registered mail is not required
The tribe must be notified of the hearing with same diligence and timeliness as parents
92
Photo Credits: Rebecca Greendeer and grandchildren 93
91
92
93
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
32
Placement Preferences
Taking a Child/Youth into Custody
An Indian child may not be placed outside of the placement preferences unless the person responsible for the placement believes:
• good cause exists, or
• that emergency conditions necessitate departing from preferences
When the reason for departing from the placement preferences is resolved, the Indian child must be placed in compliance with the order of placement preferences.
94
Best Interests of an Indian Child
When placement is necessary, an Indian child should be in a placement that reflects the unique values of the Indian child’s tribal culture, and
That assists the child in establishing, developing, and maintaining a political, cultural, and social relationship with the Indian child’s tribe.
95
Placement of an Indian Child
Indian children must be placed according to specific identified preferences, unless good cause exists to depart from the preferences, when they are:
held in temporary physical custody
placed in out‐of‐home care
placed in a pre‐adoptive placement
placed for adoption
96
94
95
96
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
33
Placement PreferencesFor holding in physical custody, out‐of‐home care, and pre‐adoptive placements, preference must be given to placement, in the order of the following:
1. The home of an extended family member of the Indian child
2. A foster home or treatment foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the Indian child’s tribe
3. An Indian foster home or treatment foster home licensed or approved by the department, a county department or a child welfare agency
4. A group home or residential care center for children and youth approved by an Indian tribe or operated by an Indian organization that has a program suitable to meet the needs of the Indian child
97
Placement Preferences
In placing an Indian child for adoption, preference must be given to a placement with one of the following, in the order of preference listed:
1. An extended family member of the Indian child
2. Another member of the Indian child’s tribe
3. Another Indian family
98
Definition of Extended Family Member A person who is defined as a member of an Indian child’s extended family by the law or custom of the Indian child’s tribe.
In the absence of such law or custom, a person who:
• is at least 18 years old, and
• fits definition of relative under s. 48.02(15).
99
97
98
99
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
34
Placement Preferences:Good Cause to Depart• Request of parent or child (sufficient age and developmental level) unless request is to avoid application of WICWA
• Extraordinary physical, mental, or emotional health needs, established by an expert witness – length of time in placement does not in itself constitute an extraordinary mental health need
– bonding with a foster parent does not in itself constitute an extraordinary mental health need
• A sibling attachment that can only be maintained through a particular placement
• Unavailability of suitable placement after diligent efforts have been made to comply
100
Documenting Placement Preferences
Document your diligent efforts for each tier of the preferences in the placement tab
Once your placement is entered you cannot go back to input this information so be sure to enter it when entering the placement in eWiSACWIS!
101
Documenting Placement Preferences
102
100
101
102
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
35
Photo Credits: Tom Jones Professor UW-Madison103
Active Efforts StandardFrom your first contacts with a family in a WICWA case, you must vigorously, continuously and diligently work to preserve the family.
104
You must make active efforts to prevent the breakup of the family.
There are no exceptions
Active Efforts StandardThe court may not order an Indian child to be removed from the home of the Indian child’s parent or Indian custodian and placed in out‐of‐home care or order an involuntary TPR unless the court or jury finds:
• that active efforts have been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitation programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian child’s family, and
• those efforts proved unsuccessful.
105
103
104
105
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
36
Active Efforts Standard
An ongoing, vigorous, and concerted level of case work made in a manner that takes into account the prevailing social and cultural values, conditions, and way of life of the Indian child’s tribe…
Wis. Statute 48.028(4)(g)1
938.028(4)(f)1
106
Active Efforts Standard… that utilizes the available resources of:
The Indian child’s tribeTribal and other Indian child welfare agencies
Extended family membersOther individual Indian caregivers Other culturally appropriate service providers.
107
Active Efforts vs Reasonable Efforts
How are they the same?
How are they different?
Is it possible to conduct reasonable efforts without engaging the family? Active efforts?
Is it possible to conduct reasonable efforts without engaging the tribe? Active efforts?
108
106
107
108
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
37
Active Efforts Specific Activities Complete a comprehensive assessment of the situation of the family.
Determine the likelihood of protecting the Indian child’s health, safety, and welfare effectively in the Indian child’s home.
Determine what services could be provided in order to avoid an out‐of‐home placement of the Indian child.
Wis. Statute 48.028(4)(g)1 am
938.028(4)(f)1 am
109
Active Efforts Specific Activities
Contact representatives designated by the Indian child’s tribe to assist in:
Evaluation of circumstances affecting the family
Development of a case plan that uses resources of the tribe and Indian community, including traditional and customary support, actions, and services, to address those circumstances.
Wis. Statute 48.028(4)(g)1 a
938.028(4)(f)1 a
110
Active Efforts Specific Activities
Identify, notify, and invite representatives designated by the Indian child’s tribe to participate in all aspects of the custody proceeding at the earliest possible point.
Actively solicit their advice throughout the proceeding.
Wis. Statute 48.028(4)(g)1 b
938.028(4)(f)1 b
111
109
110
111
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
38
Active Efforts Specific Activities
Notify and consult with extended family members identified by the Indian child’s tribe or parents in order to:
Locate and provide family structure and support for the Indian child;
Assure cultural connections; and
Serve as placement resources for the Indian child.
Wis. Statute 48.028(4)(g)1 c
938.028(4)(f)1 c
112
Active Efforts Specific Activities
Arrange unsupervised family interaction in the most natural setting that can ensure the Indian child’s safety.
Assist with transportation and other services to enable family members to participate in that interaction.
Wis. Statute 48.028(4)(g)1 d
938.028(4)(f)1 d
113
Active Efforts Specific Activities
Offer or employ all available family preservation strategies
Communicate with the Indian child’s tribe to identify strategies and ensure they are culturally appropriate to the child’s tribe.
Wis. Statute 48.028(4)(g)1 e
938.028(4)(f)1 e
114
112
113
114
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
39
Active Efforts Specific Activities
• Identify and provide information to the Indian child’s family about community resources.
• Actively assist the family or offer active assistance in accessing those resources.
Wis. Statute 48.028(4)(g)1 f
938.028(4)(f)1 f
115
Active Efforts Specific Activities
Monitor client progress and client participation in services.
If services do not exist or existing services are not available to the family, find alternate ways of addressing the needs of the family.
Wis. Statute 48.028(4)(g)1 g
938.028(4)(f)1 g
116
Active Efforts Specific Activities
If any of the specific activities were not conducted, the person seeking the out‐of‐home placement or involuntary TPR must document and explain to the court why the activity was not conducted.
A court cannot order an out‐of‐home placement or involuntary TPR without finding that active efforts have been provided.
117
115
116
117
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
40
Documenting Active Efforts
118
119
Serious Damage Standard
The court may not order:
• an Indian child to be removed from the home of the Indian child’s parent or Indian custodian and placed in out‐of‐home care or
• an involuntary termination of parental rights to an Indian child
Unless evidence shows a causal relationship between conditions in the home and likelihood that continued custody of the child will result in serious emotional or physical damage to this child.
120
118
119
120
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
41
Serious Damage Standard This is not just a finding that the court makes.
It is the standard you must use when considering removing an Indian child from his or her parent or Indian custodian.
There are no exceptions.
121
Qualified Expert Witness
Evidence supporting the court finding that continued custody of the child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child must include the testimony of one or more qualified expert witnesses.
122
Qualified Expert Witness
• Purpose of Testimony:
To ensure that basis for the action is not tainted by cultural bias
• Subject of Testimony:
Whether continued custody of the Indian child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage.
123
121
122
123
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
42
Qualified Expert Witness • The party seeking to place the Indian child in out‐of‐home care or terminate parental rights to the Indian child must utilize a qualified expert witness (QEW).
• Any other party may utilize a qualified expert witness.
• The testimony of a qualified expert witness cannot be waived by any party.
124
Who may be a QEW?Qualified expert witnesses, in the descending order of preference: A member of the Indian child’s tribe. A member of another tribe. A professional person with substantial education and experience in his or her field.
A lay person with substantial experience in delivering child and family services to Indians.
All must be knowledgeable regarding the customs of the Indian child’s tribe relating to family organization and child‐rearing practices.
The QEW cannot be the assigned county caseworker
125
Role of QEW
To testify as to whether continued custody of the child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child, using his or her expertise on the child rearing practices and family organization of the child’s tribe.
126
124
125
126
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
43
Qualified Expert WitnessThe petitioning agency must arrange for a QEW when out‐of‐home placement or termination of parental rights is being requested:
At a consent decree At the fact‐finding hearing (CHIPS, JIPS, or involuntary TPR)
At the dispositional hearing, if it was not done at the fact‐finding hearing because of a summary judgment
At a change in placement hearing, if child/youth from is moved from in‐home to a placement out of the home
127
Qualified Expert Witness• May be chosen from lower category only if party calling the witness has made a diligent effort to obtain a witness from higher order of preference
• The level of the order of preference may not be the sole consideration in weighing their testimony
• Court must consider as paramount the best interests of the Indian child as provided in s. 48.01(2).
128
Tribal View of TPR/Adoption
The historical stigma attached to adoption has resulted in many tribes being opposed to the concept of adoption
Many tribes have the belief that the parent‐child bond is one that cannot be severed and so do not believe in termination of parental rights
Some tribes utilize a customary adoption procedure that does not require a TPR
129
127
128
129
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
44
What About ASFA?
ASFA applies to all children in out‐of‐home care
WICWA applies to Indian children in out‐of‐home care
130
What About ASFA? • Active efforts are required even in specific circumstances where state statutes say that reasonable efforts are not required.
[s. 48.355(2d), Stats.]
• The TPR petition requirement for a child placed out of the home for 15 of the past 22 months still applies; however, the fact that the child is an Indian child can be the compelling reason that TPR is not in the best interests of the Indian child.
131
Noncompliance and Invalidation If the WICWA is not followed, a party may move to invalidate the entire proceedings. This could result in:
Possible return of custody to Indian parent
Nullification of adoption orders
Instability of placements of children
Delay in permanence for a child
None of these are in the best interests of an Indian Child
132
130
131
132
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
45
AccessYour agency receives a report from the local school regarding a 7 year old girl named Sophie. Sophie’s teacher is concerned because she is frequently coming to school very tired and fell asleep in class today. Sophie told the teacher that her mom had a party at the house last night and that she could not sleep well because of the noise. She said that often after her mom has parties she will sleep the entire next day leaving Sophie and her younger brother, Mason, aged 4, to take care of themselves. The parties also scare Sophie because they get very loud and out‐of‐control, and sometimes people get into fights. The teacher is concerned that Sophie’s mom is using drugs.
The teacher believes that Sophie is Native American, but is not sure what tribe she is affiliated with.
What are your agency’s responsibility at access in this case?
134
Initial Assessment
Your agency begins an Initial Assessment of Sophie’s family. Sophie lives with her younger brother, and her mother, Nicole. Nicole and Sophie’s dad, Jake, broke up shortly after Sophie was born and he has not been involved in her life since then. Nicole states that Jake is Chippewa, but does not know any further information about what tribe he was from or whether or not he was actually a member. Mason has a different dad who is not Native American.
What steps should your agency take at Initial Assessment to determine whether or not Sophie is a member or eligible for membership?
What should you do if you determine that she is eligible or a member?
135
133
134
135
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
46
Temporary Physical Custody
During the course of the Initial Assessment you determine that Sophie is eligible for membership in the Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa in Wisconsin. However, an after hours call comes in after the neighbors call the police to break up a fight during a party one night at Sophie’s house. Sophie’s mom is found to be incapacitated as she had been injecting heroin so the children are taken into temporary physical custody.
What are your agency’s responsibilities at the point of emergency removal?
136
Initial Hearing
Following the emergency removal, your agency decides to file a CHIPS petition on the family. You have been in contact with the worker at the Lac du Flambeau tribe and they have decided that they will not transfer the case into tribal court.
What does your agency need to do to prepare for the initial hearing?
137
Placement
At the emergency removal your agency placed Sophie and Mason in a temporary receiving home, but is now looking for a longer term placement for them.
What considerations must be made as far as the placement for Sophie and Mason?
138
136
137
138
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
47
Active Efforts
Develop a case plan for Sophie’s family with 5‐6 goals that are culturally specific and seek to meet the active efforts requirement.
139
Qualified Expert Witness
What are your agency’s responsibilities regarding the Qualified Expert Witness requirement?
What should you do if the Lac du Flambeau tribe does not agree with your case plan and will not provide QEW testimony?
140
141
139
140
141
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
48
Collaboration Defined
to work jointly with others, to cooperate with or willingly assist a person or an agency with which one is not immediately connected
Collaborating with the tribe is required as part of your active efforts
142
11 Wisconsin Tribes Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa
Indians (Ojibwe)
Forest County Potawatomi Community (Potawatomi)
Ho‐Chunk Nation (Ho‐Chunk)
Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin (Ojibwe)
Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians (Ojibwe)
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin (Menominee)
Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin (Oneida)
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians (Ojibwe)
Sokaogon Chippewa Community (Ojibwe)
St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin (Ojibwe)
Stockbridge‐Munsee Community (Mohican)
143
144
142
143
144
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
49
Tribal Contacts on eWiSACWIS
145
Resources: https://media.wcwpds.wisc.edu/foundation/WICWA_Online_Resource/
146
Collaboration Exercise
What works well for developing successful collaboration with the tribes in your area / county / region?
What obstacles impede successful collaboration?
How can you overcome these obstacles?
147
145
146
147
Case Practice with American Indian Tribes 4/29/2020
50
Ten Tips for State/Tribe Collaboration1. Approach tribes with respect as unique, sovereign entities.
Treat tribes as partners, not adversaries.
2. Know the law and state/tribal agreements.
3. Inquire whether children/parents are American Indian in all cases at every stage of the case.
4. Provide tribes with timely notice of ICWA cases. Be sure to notify the right contact at the tribe; in Wisconsin, notify the tribe’s Indian child welfare office.
5. Give tribal court orders and acts full faith and credit. Tribal courts have full authority to conduct Indian child custody proceedings (ICWA, P.L. 95‐608, Section 1911 (d)).
6. Work collaboratively with tribal child welfare workers in implementing ICWA requirements and include tribal social workers in all aspects of case plan development, including permanency planning.
148
Ten Tips for State/Tribe Collaboration (Continued)
7. Remember that active efforts is a higher standard than reasonable efforts.
8. Contact extended family members. Remember that American Indian extended families are much larger than mainstream families and include relatives beyond grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. The definition of extended family member may vary from tribe to tribe; be sure you know the definition for the tribe with which you are working.
9. Follow ICWA or Tribal Placement Preferences.10. Do not fast‐track potential Indian child welfare cases
without immediately involving the tribes and extended family members.
Source: Amanda Cross, Institute for Child and Family Policy, Muskie School, University of Southern Maine, in consultation with the National Indian Child Welfare Association
149
"Let us put our minds together and see what kind of life we can build for our children."
Sitting Bull
150
148
149
150