Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute Process ... · CMMI® v1.1 SCAMPISM v1.1 Class A Appraisal Results 2005 End-Year Update March 2006 ... CMMI Appraisal Program The Software

Software Engineering InstituteCarnegie Mellon

CMMI® v1.1 – SCAMPI v1.1 Class A Appraisal Results

March 2006 Process Maturity Profile - Page 1© 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University


Process Maturity Profile

CMMI® v1.1SCAMPISM v1.1 Class A Appraisal Results 2005 End-Year Update

March 2006

We could not produce this report without the support of the organizations and lead appraisers who reported their appraisal results to the SEISM.

Our many thanks for their continuing cooperation with our data collection and analysis efforts.

CMMI Appraisal Program

The Software Engineering Institute is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Def ense and operated by Carnegie Mellon® University

® CMMI Capability Maturity Model and Carnegie Mellon are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon UniversitySM SCAMPI and SEI are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University

© 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University




Outline

Introduction

Current Status

Summary

Terms used in this Briefing

How to Report your Appraisal Results to the SEI

This briefing is based solely on the appraisals reported to the SEI. It cannot be used as a source for an exact indicator of all organizations in the world using CMMI models or appraisal methods nor can it be used for certification or verification purposes.

The SEI does not certify appraisal results or organizations. The SEI licenses SEI Partners, authorizes lead appraisers and teamleaders to conduct appraisals. Neither the SEI nor any other organization is a “certifying authority” of the results from a SCAMPI appraisal. Therefore requests to the SEI to provide information to be used for this purpose can not be fulfilled. Information provided by the SEI, such as this briefing, is to demonstrate reported results of the use of CMMI products and services only.

Organizations performing source selection or verification should consider performing an evaluation appraisal. For more information on appraisal methods and for a directory of authorized lead appraisers who can perform them, visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/appraisal-program/




Introduction: Purpose

Characterize the adoption of CMMI® ®

Describe results from Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPISM) v1.1 Class A appraisals using Capability Maturity Model® Integration(CMMI) v1.1 *

Encourage continued reporting of results

* Organizations previously appraised against CMMI v1.0 and which have not reappraised against v 1.1 are not included in this report

Please visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/appraisal-program/profile/about.html for additional information or questions you may have about this briefing before contacting the SEI directly




Section 1. Current Status

SCAMPI v1.1 Class A appraisals conducted from its April 2002 release through and reported to the SEI by

• appraisals• organizations• participating companies• reappraised organizations• projects• Non-USA organizations

Please refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 19

Additional charts providing different views and break down of this information will be added to this briefing as more appraisal data is reported to the SEI over time.

January 2006

1,264

644130

4,77162.0%

1,106

December 2005




Based on most recent appraisal of organizations

Num

ber

Of O

rgan

izat

ions

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

Not Given Initial Managed Defined QuantitativelyManaged

Optimizing

Process Maturity Profile by All Reporting Organizations

1,106

9.0%

2.2%

32.9% 32.9%

4.5%

18.4%




0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Military/GovernmentAgency

Contractor forMilitary/Government

Commercial/In-house

Number of Organizations

Based on organizations

Reporting Organizational Categories

30.2%

65.6%

4.2%

1,106




7.2%

1.9%

32.5% 33.2%

5.5%

19.7%

9.3%

3.0%

30.8%

36.2%

3.0%

17.7%

37.0%

54.3%

4.3% 4.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Optimizing

Commercial/In-house: 100% = 726

Contractor for Military/Government: 100% = 334

Military/Government Agency: 100% = 46

Based on most recent appraisal of organizations

% O

f Org

aniz

atio

ns

Process Maturity Profile by Reporting Organization Categories

1,106




Business Services38.4%

Engineering & Management Services13.4%

Other Services0.9%

Mining0.2%

Wholesale Trade0.9%

Transportation, Communication, Electric, Gas

and Sanitary Services2.6%

Retail Trade0.2%

Finance, Insurance and Real Estate6.4%

Public Administration (Including Defense)

11.1%

Fabricated Metal Products0.5%

Primary Metal Industries1.2%

Industrial Machinery And Equipment

2.1%

Instruments And Related Products

6.4%

Electronic & Other Electric Equipment

4.7%

Transportation Equipment10.1%Health Services

0.7%

Based on organizations reporting SIC code. For more information visit: http://www.osha.gov/oshstats/sicser.html

Organization TypeBased on Primary Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code

Manufacturing25.0%

Services53.5%

424




Based on organizations reporting size data

25 or fewer9.9%

101 to 20018.9%201 to 300

11.0%

76 to 1008.7%

51 to 7510.3%

26 to 5012.7%

301 to 5009.8%

501 to 10009.1%

1001 to 20006.3% 2000+

3.3%

Organization SizeBased on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised

1,083

1 to 10041.6%

201 to 2000+39.5%




Maturity Profile by Organization Size Based on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised

8.4%

11.7

%

6.3%

11.7

%

10.2

%

9.2

%

4.7%

8.1%

7.4%

5.6%

5.6%

2.2% 3.6%

2.1%

0.5% 2.

5%

0.9%

1.0% 2.

9%

66.4

%

48.2

%

39.3

%

28

.7%

35

.1%

25.2

%

22.6

%

13.1

%

7.4% 8.3%

16.8

%

32.8

% 38

.4%

37.2

%

32.2

%

42.9

%

37.7

%

26.3

%

33.8

%

33

.3%

0.9% 2.

7%

6.4%

6.3%

3.4%

6.6%

12.1

%

2.9%

1.9%

5.1%

9.8%

13.8

%

15.6

%

16.8

%

27.4

%

39.4

%

45.6

%

47.2

%5.

6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

25 or fewer 26 to 50 51 to 75 76 to 100 101 to 200 201 to 300 301 to 500 501 to 1000 1001 to 2000 2000+

Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing

Based on organizations reporting size data1,083

% o

f Org

aniz

atio

ns




Disciplines Selected for Appraisals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

SE

/SW

SW

SE

/SW

/SS

SE

/SW

/IPP

D/S

S

SE

SE

/SW

/IPP

D

SW

/IPP

D

SW

/SS

SE

/SS

SE

/IPP

D/S

S

SW

/IPP

D/S

S

46.5%

Based on appraisals1,264

SE = System Engineering SW = Software EngineeringIPPD = Integrated Product and

Process Development SS = Supplier Sourcing

Num

ber

of A

ppra

isal

s

For more information about Allowable Models & Combinations, visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/background/aspec.html

50.7%

34.7%

4.4% 4.0% 2.5%1.8% 1.1% 0.6% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%




Countries where Appraisals have been Performed and Reported to the SEI

Red country name: New additions with this reporting

Argentina Australia Austria Belarus Belgium Brazil CanadaChile China Colombia Czech Republic Denmark Egypt FinlandFrance Germany Hong Kong India Ireland Israel ItalyJapan Korea, Republic of Latvia Malaysia Mauritius Mexico NetherlandsNew Zealand Philippines Portugal Russia Singapore Slovakia South AfricaSpain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Thailand Turkey UkraineUnited Kingdom United States Vietnam




Based on USA organizations and Non-USA organizations

USA and Non-USAReporting Organization Categories

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Military/GovernmentAgency

Contractor forMilitary/Government

Commercial/In-house

% of Organizations

USA: 100% = 420

Non-USA: 100% = 686

686420

1

75

610

45

259

116




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Optimizing

USA: 100 % = 420

Non-USA: 100 % = 686

Based on USA organizations and Non-USA organizations

% o

f Org

aniz

atio

ns

Maturity Profile by All Reporting USA and Non-USA Organizations

686420

125

8

63

3912

213 239

42

141

151

12

61




Number of Appraisals and Maturity LevelsReported to the SEI by Country

CountryNumber of Appraisals

Maturity Level 1

Reported

Maturity Level 2

Reported

Maturity Level 3

Reported

Maturity Level 4

Reported

Maturity Level 5

Reported CountryNumber of Appraisals

Maturity Level 1

Reported

Maturity Level 2

Reported

Maturity Level 3

Reported

Maturity Level 4

Reported

Maturity Level 5

ReportedArgentina 12 No Yes Yes Yes No Latvia 10 or fewerAustralia 21 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Malaysia 10 or fewerAustria 10 or fewer Mauritius 10 or fewerBelarus 10 or fewer Mexico 10 or fewerBelgium 10 or fewer Netherlands 10 or fewerBrazil 22 No Yes Yes No Yes New Zealand 10 or fewerCanada 15 No Yes Yes No Yes Philippines 10Chile 10 or fewer Portugal 10 or fewerChina 117 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Russia 10 or fewerColombia 10 or fewer Singapore 10 or fewerCzech Republic 10 or fewer Slovakia 10 or fewerDenmark 10 or fewer South Africa 10 or fewerEgypt 10 or fewer Spain 18 No Yes Yes No YesFinland 10 or fewer Sweden 10 or fewerFrance 42 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Switzerland 10 or fewerGermany 22 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Taiwan 26 No Yes Yes No NoHong Kong 10 or fewer Thailand 10 or fewerIndia 140 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Turkey 10 or fewerIreland 10 or fewer Ukraine 10 or fewerIsrael 10 or fewer United Kingdom 35 Yes Yes Yes Yes NoItaly 10 or fewer United States 500 Yes Yes Yes Yes YesJapan 131 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vietnam 10 or fewerKorea, Republic of 50 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes




Based on appraisals reporting a maturity level 1 rating

Process Area Profiles - 1Organizations Appraised at Maturity Level 1

% of Appraisals

45

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

REQM

PP

PMC

SAM

MA

PPQA

CM

RD

TS

PI

Ver

Val

OPF

OPD

OT

IPM

RSKM

ISM

DAR

OPP

QPM

OID

CAR

Fully Satisfied

Rated

Managed

Defined

QuantitativelyManaged

Optimizing




Quantitatively Managed

Defined

Based on appraisals reporting a maturity level 2 rating

Process Area Profiles - 2Organizations Appraised at Maturity Level 2

402

% of Appraisals

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

RD

TS

PI

Ver

Val

OPF

OPD

OT

IPM

RSKM

IT

ISM

DAR

OEI

QPM

Fully Satisfied

Rated




Summary

1,264 appraisals have been reported to the SEI in 46 months

Both Commercial/In-House organizations, Government/Military and Government/Military Contractors reporting appraisals are increasing at a stable and consistent rate

The highest percentage of Commercial/In-House organizations reporting appraisals is from outside the USA

The highest percentage of Government/Military Contractors reporting appraisals is from the USA

Comparing early reports of the SW-CMM maturity profile with early CMMI data reflects a more mature CMMI® profile

Additional information and charts will be added to this briefing as more appraisals are reported and more data is available to support the breakdowns




Terms Used in this Report

Company - Parent of the appraised entityA company can be a commercial or non-commercial firm, for-profit or not for-profit business, a research and development unit, a higher education unit, a government agency, or branch of service, etc.

Organization - a.k.a. Appraised entity The organization unit to which the appraisal results apply. An appraised entity can be the entire company, a selected business unit, units supporting a particular product line or service, etc.

Non-USA - Appraised entity whose geographic location is not within the United States. The parent of the appraised entity may or may not be based within the United States.




Report your Appraisal Results to the SEI

The briefing is only possible due to the cooperation of organizations and individuals sending in their appraisal results to the SEI

In order to provide this information and service in the future, it will depend on this continued cooperation

Please visit:

http://www.sei.cmu.edu/appraisal-program/profile/about.html

for forms, information, and instructions on how to report appraisals to the SEI




Contact InformationPlease visit:

http://www.sei.cmu.edu/appraisal-program/profile/about.html

and review the information provided before contacting:

SEI Customer Relations (412) 268-5800SEI FAX number (412) 268-5758

Internet [email protected]

Mailing AddressCustomer RelationsSoftware Engineering InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburgh, PA 15213-3890

Documents

Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute Process ... · CMMI® v1.1 SCAMPISM v1.1 Class A Appraisal Results 2005 End-Year Update March 2006 ... CMMI Appraisal Program The Software