Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Careers in Investments
Portfolio Manager (PM)
Which valuation approach do you use?
Valuation approach Yes
If yes,
% of
cases
Market Multiples 93% 69%
DCF 79% 60%
Asset Based 61% 37%
Real Options 5% 21%
Knowledge-Based Economy
Components of S&P 500 Market Value100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1975 1985 1995 2005 2015
Tangible assetsIntangible assets
Knowledge-Based Economy
Adjusted R2 from regression of companies’ market value on their sales,
cost of sales, SG&A, earnings, assets, and liabilities, 1950–2015
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year
Importance of Industry in Valuation
Does your selection of valuation methods
depend on the industry or economic sector in
which the company operates?
Yes – 68%
No – 32%
Energy is Different!
ESG Data Is Increasingly Available
).
Cumulative ESG data points available from Bloomberg for 453 select metrics
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*
But Is the Data Decision-Useful?
E&S data availability by metric type, MSCI ACWI constituents
350,000
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
75%
68%
120%
Num
be
r o
f d
ata
po
ints
Total metrics Policy Numeric
2007 2015
0
What Works in the Energy Sector?
Overweighting Top ESG Ratings?
Increase in Return = 0%
Increase in Sharpe Ratio = 0.01
Decrease in Max Drawdown = -2.5%
What Works in the Energy Sector?
Overweighting Top ESG Ratings?
Increase in Return = 0%
Increase in Sharpe Ratio = 0.01
Decrease in Max Drawdown = -2.5%
Avoiding Bottom ESG Ratings? Increase in Return = 0.7%
Increase in Sharpe Ratio = 0.04
Decrease in Max Drawdown = -0.8%
February 12, 2020
The Environmental Partnership
ENERCOM DALLAS
The Environmental Partnership
MissionContinuously improve the industry’s environmental performance by taking action,
learning about best practices and technologies, and fostering collaboration in order to responsibly develop our nation’s essential oil and natural gas resources.
Three Program Principles
• Companies implement environmental performance programs that are cost-effective, commercially proven, and achieve significant emissions reductions
Take Action
• Host industry workshops to foster operator-to-operator information sharing about best practices and new technologies
Learn
• Host conferences to promote dialogue with stakeholder groups to share information on new academic research, program learnings, and new technological developments
Collaborate
Building Broad & Diverse Participation
Continued Focus on Recruitment
The Partnership has more than doubled to 70 companies
…and growing
Participating Companies 1. Aera Energy
2. Aethon Energy
3. Alta Resources
4. American Petroleum Partners
5. Antero Resources
6. Apache
7. Ascent Resources
8. BHP
9. BP
10. Cabot Oil and Gas
11. California Resources Corporation
12. Callon Petroleum
13. Chesapeake
14. Chevron
15. Cimarex
16. ConocoPhillips
35. JKLM Energy
36. Lime Rock Resources
37. Marathon Oil
38. Murphy Oil
39. Noble Energy
40. Oasis Petroleum
41. Occidental Petroleum
42. Olympus Energy
43. Ovintiv
44. Parsley Energy
45. PDC Energy
46. Penn General Energy
47. PennEnergy Resources
48. Pioneer Natural Resources
49. QEP Resources
50. Range Resources
51. Red Bluff Resources
52. Repsol
17. Continental Resources
18. CrownQuest
19. Denbury Resources
20. Devon
21. Enerplus
22. EOG Resources
23. EQT
24. Equinor
25. Equitrans Midstream
26. Extraction Oil & Gas
27. ExxonMobil
28. Fieldwood Energy
29. Flywheel Energy
30. Gulfport Energy
31. Hess
32. HighPoint Resources
33. Hunt Oil Company
34. Inidgo Resources
53. Riviera Resources
54. Sable Permian Resources
55. Seneca Resources
56. Sequitur Energy
57. Shell
58. SM Energy
59. Southwestern
60. Summit Discovery Resources
61. Surge Energy
62. Tallgrass Energy
63. Total
64. Trinity Operating
65. Warwick Energy
66. Western Gas
67. Whiting Petroleum
68. Williams Energy
69. WPX Energy
70. XTO Energy
70 Participating Companies Currently
The Environmental Partnership
Taking Action
Emission Sources of Interest
Initial focus is the further reduction of air emissions, both methane and volatile organic compounds, from oil and natural gas sector.
Focus on highest emitting sources:
• Equipment Leaks
• High-Bleed Pneumatic Controllers
• Liquids Unloading
Environmental Performance Programs
To address top-emitting sources, participating companies will implement the following Environmental Performance Programs in a manner that best suits their unique operations:
1. Detection and timely repair of leaking equipment using optical gas imaging cameras, portable analyzers, or equivalent technology
2. Replacement or retrofitting of high-bleed pneumatic controllers with lower-emitting or zero-bleed controllers
3. Implementation of a best practice to minimize emissions by monitoring manual liquids unloading events
Leak Detection and Repair Program
2018 Highlights
Controller and Liquids Unloading Programs
2018 Highlights
The Environmental Partnership
Learning
Industry-Focused Workshops
• As part of the program’s “Learning” principle, The Partnership provides opportunities for companies to come together to share operational knowledge and best practices.
• The Partnership hosted two workshops in 2018:
• Canonsburg, PA for Appalachian operators (July 26th)
• Odessa, TX for Permian Basin operators (April 4th)
• The Partnership hosted three workshops in 2019:
• Midland, TX (April 9th)
• Oklahoma City, OK (April 11th)
• Dickinson, ND (July 25th)
• The Partnership will host multiple workshops across the country in 2020, starting with Midland Texas in March.
The Environmental Partnership
Collaborating
2019 Annual Conference – “The Field of the Future”
• Each year, The Partnership hosts an annual conference to foster collaboration between industry operators and the organizations developing, testing, and implementing cutting-edge technology and techniques that are further reducing our environmental footprint.
• The 2019 Annual Conference was held in Houston, Texas and we will return to Houston for the 2020 Annual Conference.
Annual Conference Presenters
Program Collaboration since 2018 – CSU Energy Institute
• As part of the program’s goal to advance the development of new technologies, funding was approved to support a study at Colorado State University’s METEC site.
• METEC is a testing site that models natural gas facilities for researchers to test low-cost methane sensing technologies.
• Funding allowed participating companies to send their optical gas imaging camera operators to the site and advance the use of new detection technologies in the field.
2019 Annual Report
• The Environmental Partnership’s First Annual Report was released July 30th.
• Please visit www.TheEnvironmentalPartnership.organd click on “Annual Report” to find out more!
For additional information, please contact:
Matthew Todd, Director [email protected]
Cole Ramsey, Program Coordinator [email protected]
Reporting Requirements
• Participating companies agree to annual reporting to track progress.
• Annual reporting due April 30th.
• The Partnership’s programs are purposefully designed to evolve in response to new information that will come from its implementation.
• All reported data is aggregated, and an annual report is developed to document The Partnership’s efforts and made available to the public on our website.
NYSE: HPR
February 12, 2020
ENERCOM ESG PANELKen Wonstolen – SVP & General Counsel
NYSE: HPR 30
All statements in this press release, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Words such as expects, forecast, guidance, anticipates,
intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking
statements herein; however, these are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this
release relate to, among other things, future production, projects and opportunities.
These and other forward-looking statements in this press release are based on management's judgment as of the date of this release and are
subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. Actual results may vary significantly from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Please
refer to HighPoint Resources' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC, and other filings,
including our Current Reports on Form 8-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, all of which are incorporated by reference herein, for further
discussion of risk factors that may affect the forward-looking statements. The Company encourages you to consider the risks and uncertainties
associated with projections and other forward-looking statements and to not place undue reliance on any such statements. In addition, the
Company assumes no obligation to publicly revise or update any forward-looking statements based on future events or circumstances. Results
presented for the third quarter of 2019 are preliminary and subject to change as the Company finalizes its financial statements for the quarter.
FORWARD-LOOKING & OTHER CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR 31
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR 32
NYSE: HPR
NYSE: HPR
NYSE: HPR
NYSE: HPR
NYSE: HPR
NYSE: HPR
NYSE: HPR
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR
Normalized EHS Performance Statistics 2013 to 2019
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Injuries per 200,000 hrs worked Spills/MMBoe Fires/MMBoe MVI / 200,000 hrs worked
Note: 2017 and prior data is BBC only
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR 41
Corporate Governance Documents Available on the Company’s Website
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR
Proxy Peer Comparison
Company NameEnvironmental Overall
ScoreSocial Overall Score
Industry Group (4-Digit GICS)
PDC Energy, Inc. 6 5 Energy
HighPoint Resources Corp. 7 6 Energy
Contango Oil & Gas Company 7 7 Energy
Callon Petroleum Company 7 8 Energy
Matador Resources Company 7 9 Energy
Abraxas Petroleum Corporation 9 10 Energy
Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. 10 7 Energy
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR 43
ISS Climate Awareness Scorecard
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR 44
New Emphasis on ESG
Source: Wall Street Journal
• Asking companies to publish disclosures aligned with TCFD- and SASB-guidelines by the end 2020
• Will double the number of ESG ETFs it offers and offer sustainable versions of all of its largest index portfolios
• Align engagement goals with the UN Sustainable Development Goals, and will move to quarterly voting disclosure
• Will begin publicly disclosing the topics that it engages with each company on annually
• Will begin voting against the boards of big companies that lag behind on ESG standards
• Will focus on a smaller group of companies that are performing particularly poorly, but beginning in 2022 it will also start voting against the board members of all companies that have consistently underperformed their peers
• Introduced an “R-Factor”, or responsibility score, last year measuring various ESG Metrics
BlackRock
State Street Global Advisors
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR 45
Pushback is coming…
“…we see labeling based on incomplete information, public shaming and shunning wrapped in moral rhetoric preached with cold-hearted, self-righteous oblivion to the consequences…”
“After all, naming and shaming corporate villains is fun, trendy and profitable”
“In our modern corporate ESG world, there is a group of people who take the lead in instigating their fellow citizens into a frenzy of moral rectitude.”
Source: Pierce, Hester. “Scarlet Letters”
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR 46
SEC proposed rule would have blocked 614 ESG resolutions since 2010
Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence
NYSE: HPRNYSE: HPR 47
NYSE: HPR
555 17th Street, Suite 3700
Denver, Colorado 80202303.293.9100
Website: www.hpres.com
Investor Relations Contact:
Larry C. Busnardo(303) 312.8514 | [email protected]