Upload
loren
View
36
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Careers Have no Gender Colorado Collaborative for Girls in STEM Jennifer Jirous STEM & Arts Program Director Colorado Community College System. Inventions by Women. Kevlar (1964 ) Stephanie Kwolek Nystatin (1950) Rachel Fuller Brown and Elizabeth Lee Hazen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Careers Have no Gender
Colorado Collaborative for Girls in STEM
Jennifer JirousSTEM & Arts Program Director
Colorado Community College System
Inventions by Women1. Kevlar (1964 ) Stephanie Kwolek 2. Nystatin (1950) Rachel Fuller Brown and Elizabeth Lee Hazen 3. Windshield wiper (1903) Mary Anderson4. Dishwasher (1886) Josephine Cochrane5. Square bottom paper bag (1871) Margaret Knight6. Colored flare system (1857) Martha Coston7. Compiler and COBOL Language (1950’s) Grace Hopper8. Liquid paper (1958) Bessie Nesmith9. Chocolate Chip Cookie (1930) Ruth Graves Wakefield10. Circular saw (1812) Tabitha Babbit
STEM SourcesWomen in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation (2011)
U.S. Department of CommerceEconomics and Statistics AdministrationESA Issue Brief #03-11
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (2010)
American Association of University Women
Colorado’s K-12 STEM Ed Report Card (2011)STEMConnector
Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation
U.S Department of CommerceEconomics and Statistics Administration Issue
BriefAugust 2011
What is a STEM job?Professional and technical support occupations in the fields of computer science
and mathematics, engineering, and life and
physical sciencesSource: U.S. Department of Commerce: Economics and Statistics Administration, ESA Issue Brief #04-11, August 2011.
National Statistics (2009)
7.4 million workers in STEM jobs or 5.3% of the population
91% of STEM jobs require post-secondary education (2018)
Occupational area47% Computer and mathematical science 32% Engineering and surveying12% Physical sciences8% STEM management jobs
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce: Economics and Statistics Administration, ESA Issue Brief #04-11, August 2011.
Colorado Statistics (2011)
232,000 STEM-related jobs by 2018$74,958 Average salary (2005-2008)Occupational area
115,000 Computer and Mathematical Science58,000 Engineers and technicians30,000 Life and physical sciences17,000 Architects and technicians12,000 Social Sciences
Source: Colorado’s K-12 STEM Ed Report Card 2011, STEMConnector, 222.stemconnector.org
Women in STEM jobsWomen comprise 48% of workforce but only 24% of
STEM workersEarn 33% more than women in non-STEM jobs
making the wage gap smaller in STEM jobs than in non-STEM jobs
Those with STEM degree less likely than males to work in STEM occupation; more likely to work in education or healthcare
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce: Economics and Statistics Administration, ESA Issue Brief #04-11, August 2011.
Despite the positive trends in high school, the transition from
high school to college is a critical time for young women in
STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics).
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
American Association of University Women (AAUW)
2010www.aauw.org
Female Male0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Intent of First-Year College Students to Major in Science and Engineering Fields, by Gender, 2006
Physical sciencesMathematics/ sta-tisticsEngineering
Perc
enta
geWomen are less likely than men are to declare
a STEM major in college.
Source: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. Data derived from Cooperative Institutional Research Program, Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 1990 through Fall 2006, www.gseis.ucla.edu/heri/heri.htm.
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000 MalesFemales
Year
Num
ber o
f Deg
rees
Bachelor's Degrees Conferred, by Gender,1971–72 to 2006–07
Source: Snyder, T.D., Dillow, S.A., and Hoffman, C.M. (2009). Digest of Education Statistics 2008 (NCES 2009-020). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
Women have earned the majority of bachelor’s degrees since 1982.
Women’s representation among STEM bachelor’s degree holdershas improved over time but varies by field.
Source: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, 2008, Science and engineering degrees: 1966–2006 (Detailed Statistical Tables) (NSF 08-321) (Arlington, VA), Table 11, Author's analysis of Tables 34, 35, 38, & 39.
Bachelor’s Degrees Earned by Women in Selected Fields, 1966–2006
Women’s representation in the STEM workforce is also
uneven.
Biological scientists
Chemists and materials sci-
entists
Environmen-tal scientists and geosci-
entists
Computer scientists and systems ana-
lysts
Computer programmers
Computer software engineers
Chemical engineers
Civil en-gineers
Electrical and electronics engineers
Mechanical engineers
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Perc
enta
ge o
f Wom
en
Women are underrepresented in many science and engineering occupations.
Percentage of Employed STEM Professionals Who Are Women, Selected Professions, 2008
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2009, Women in the labor force: A databook (Report 1018) (Washington, DC), Table 11.
AAUW drew on the large body of academic research on gender in science in a number of fields and
identified eight research findings that help to explain the underrepresentation
of women and girls in STEM.
Eight research findings in three areas:
• How social and environmental factors shape girls’ achievements and interests in math and science
• The climate of college and university science and engineering departments
• Continuing influence of bias
Why So Few? presents evidence that social and environmental factors contribute to the
underrepresentation of women and girls in STEM.
Girls’ achievements and interests
in math and science are shaped by
the environment around them.
Negative stereotypes about girls’ and women’s abilities in math and science
adversely affect their performance in these fields.
Expose girls to successful female role models in math and science.
Teach students about stereotype threat.
Source: Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M., 1999, "Stereotype threat and women's math performance," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), p. 13.
Performance on a Challenging Math Test, by Stereotype Threat Condition and Gender
In math and science, a growth mindset benefits girls.
Fixed Mindset Growth MindsetIntelligence is static. Intelligence can be
developed.Leads to a desire to look smart and therefore a tendency to
Leads to a desire to learn and therefore a tendency to
• avoid challenges • embrace challenges
• give up easily due to obstacles
• persist despite obstacles
• see effort as fruitless • see effort as path to mastery
• ignore useful feedback
• learn from criticism
• be threatened by others’ success
• be inspired by others’ success
Teach children that intellectual skills can be acquired.
Praise children for effort.
Highlight the struggle.
Gifted and talented programs should send the message that they value growth and learning.
Spatial skills are not innate and can be improved with training.
One of the largest and most persistent gender gaps in cognitive skills is found in the area of mental rotation, where boys consistently outperform girls.
Playing with building toys as well as drawing can help children develop spatial skills.
Women are “harder on themselves” in terms of assessing their abilities in math and
science fields.
Does this rectangle have more black or more white?
• Set clear performance standards• Help girls recognize their career-relevant skills
Bias, often unconscious, limits women’s progress in scientific
and engineering fields.
Even people who consciously reject negative stereotypes about women in science can still hold those beliefs at an unconscious level.
• Take a test to learn about your unconscious bias at https://implicit.harvard.edu.
• Take steps to address your biases.
Most people associate science and math fields with “male” and humanities and arts fields with “female.”
• Women in “male” jobs are viewed as less competent than their male peers.
• When women are clearly competent, they are often considered less “likable.”
• Raise awareness about bias against women in STEM fields.
• Create clear criteria for success.
Women in nontraditional fields can find themselves in a “double bind.”
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
To download the report:www.aauw.org
To contact the researchers:[email protected]
Thank You!
Jennifer JirousColorado Community College System