Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Career & Technical Education in NYC: A Comprehensive Survey
Part II: Employer Responses
April 2015
www.pwc.com
PwC
Contents
Slide 2
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Page
Introduction 3
Methodology 5
Key findings 7
Profile of Employers 11
Nature of Partnerships 14
Employer Engagement 29
Internships 32
Mentorships 41
Hiring 46
Challenges 51
Appendix: Overview of School Survey Findings 60
PwC
Introduction
Slide 3
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Introduction
• This survey and analysis describe the current status of Career and Technical Education(CTE) activities in NYC schools from the perspective of educators and employers. Thedata collected provides a baseline for continued improvement of CTE initiatives thatprepare NYC students for college, advanced training, and successful careers.
• Mayor de Blasio, Chancellor Fariña, and the NYC Department of Education haveprioritized the transformation of CTE schools and programs. They have already set inmotion many of the actions and structural changes necessary to better engageemployers and provide schools with the resources they need to offer more effective andwell integrated CTE programs.
• Part I of this survey was conducted at the end of 2014, with a 90% response rate fromschools and program managers, providing information from 48 dedicated CTE schoolsand 84 schools with CTE programs.
• Part II of the survey was conducted in the first quarter of 2015, drawing on school andprogram responses to identify 733 employers that are currently involved with CTE,including 333 for-profit businesses, 299 nonprofit institutions and 101 governmentagencies. (Businesses include 74 employers with estimated 500 employees or more.)
Slide 4
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Methodology
Slide 5
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Methodology
Employer survey
• 233 online surveys were completed by New York City employers during February and March 2015.
• Responses represent the views of 221 unique employers from government, business and the nonprofit sector that are actively engaged with CTE schools and programs.
• Employers were identified by CTE schools, nonprofit service providers, and the Department of Education.
• The survey was open for three weeks and generated an overall response of 22% completion.
Schools survey
• 119 online surveys were conducted across CTE schools in New York City during October 2014.
• The sample consisted of both CTE dedicated schools and schools with CTE program(s).
• The survey was open for two weeks and generated an overall response of 90% completion.
• The CTE dedicated school population was a census with 100% response.
Slide 6
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Key findings
Slide 7
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Key findings
Slide 8
April 2015
Observations from survey data Challenges Recommended Actions
Survey responses were wide-ranging, reflecting lack of consensus among schools and CTE partner organizations, and highlighting the fragmentation of the city’s CTE universe.
Fragmentation makes achieving a more integrated and effective system difficult.Complex regulatory, contractual and legal requirements, as well as federal and state funding formulas, exacerbate the problem.
Identify the strongest leaders to represent schools, nonprofit service providers and employers to form a leadership network that will work with DOE and City Hall to plan and implement the integration and transformation of the CTE system, including needed reform in state laws and regulations.
Employers find that CTE students are academically well-prepared for internships and schools agree that work-based learning helps ensure student success post-graduation.
Fewer than 2% of high school students in CTE schools or programs get an internship and these tend to be higher achieving students who compete for few opportunities.
There should be a concerted effort to secure more internships, but it will remain hard to source internships for all CTE students. A continuum of work-based learning opportunities and mentorships should be put into place system-wide, so that a broader cross section of CTE students are introduced to a relevant workplace experience.
Employers are largely engaged with CTE as a charitable activity, not because they plan to hireCTE students.
Most participating employers require a college or graduate degree for majority of hires. With a few exceptions, CTE does not provide a clear path from high school through college or advanced training.
Expand pool of employers to include more that directly hire high school and community college graduates, including outsourcing and temp agencies. Build long term career and educational plans into CTE programming and use the data system to follow student milestones beyond high school.
Employers are discouraged by the lack of a clear, overarching structure or comprehensive plan to support and coordinate individual CTE initiatives.
The CTE infrastructure of public agencies and nonprofit intermediaries is too complex and often not aligned with employer or industry expectations. Intermediaries lack the capacity to recruit and manage sufficient numbers of employers and work experience opportunities.
Reorganize the CTE network so that all participating employers are plugged into a system that is easy to understand and navigate. A handful of “best in class” intermediaries should be identified to recruit and manage effective employer engagement.
PwC
Key findings
Slide 9
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Observations from survey data Challenges Actions
There is a serious shortage of quality work experience opportunities for CTE students. Nonprofit intermediaries do the best job of securing internships and mentor commitments from employers. Schools lack resources to adequately develop and manage work experience activities.
There is inadequate public funding to support full time school-based work based learning coordinators, to fund internships or to expand contracts with nonprofit intermediaries. As a result, only a handful of CTE students get paid internships and only a small number of private sector employers are effectively engaged with CTE programs.
Survey results should be used to set targets and identify budget requirements for meeting expanded mentoring, internship and work experience objectives, in collaboration with “best in class” nonprofit service providers and a much larger pool of employers. Achieving these targets should be centralized and not left to individual schools.
Most schools report the need for greateremployer engagement, employer integration and overall employer relationships. Employers cite bureaucratic red tape and slow response time as the biggest obstacles to greater involvement.
The current practice of leaving employer engagement and CTE program management to individual schools, scattered nonprofits and multiple advisory councils is too fragmented and inefficient to be successful.
Employer CTE relationships need to be coordinated through a city-wide, centrally managed system, with clear lines of authority and decision-making capacity. Ultimately, schools and nonprofit service providers must be accountable to the Mayor and Chancellor, as well as DOE borough offices and District Superintendents.
There is a need for greater integration of academic course work and CTE training to ensure that CTE graduates are well prepared foradvanced training, college and careers.
Among CTE schools and programs, there is no system-wide consensus on the right balance of technical and academic skills, hard and soft skills development. Updating of CTE curriculum and credentialing to conform to changing workplace demands is erratic.
CTE initiatives should be organized around industry verticals to enable a collective effort to support curriculum updates and professional development of teachers in relevant career categories.
Employers and CTE schools and programs agree that CTE teachers are generally prepared to teach content that is relevant to today’s workplace.
Today’s workplace is rapidly changing, with new technologies, equipment and skills requirements being introduced at an unprecedented pace.
Professional development of CTE teachers, as well as school leaders, should be ramped up and complemented by introduction of adjunct teachers drawn from industry. A formal annual needs assessment to inform curriculum and credentialing is needed to ensure CTE remains aligned with the job market.
PwC
Key findings
Slide 10
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Observations from survey data Challenges Actions
Schools and nonprofit service providers are not comfortable sharing their relationships and resources.
Turf protection is a barrier to system integration, scaling of best practices and broader employer engagement.
Create an online database that makes relationships and resources transparent, and establish a funding and accountability system that rewards those who collaborate and share.
Employers and educators cite inadequate or poorly allocated resources as a key obstacle to improving employer engagement and CTE outcomes.
Schools and nonprofits identify inadequate staffing and funding for internships and programs as key challenges; businesses are looking for improved planning, communication, and better organization.
The CTE budget should be reconsidered in response to survey results, including more funding for managing relationships between schools and employers, for internships, and for nonprofit intermediation between schools and employers.
Schools and employers complain about poor infrastructure, particularly in terms of lack of technology and automated tracking systems, that are necessary to support long term commitments and better outcomes in terms of preparation for higher education and employment.
Individual CTE schools and programs each have responsibility for their own student population, employer relationships, and support services with minimal support from the central system. Consequently, infrastructure is fragmented and the quality is uneven, depending on the ingenuity and relationships at the school or program level.
CTE Industry Commissions were recently established and, if strengthened and effectively staffed, could provide the framework for building system-wide infrastructure to support individual school efforts. The City’s Chief Technology Officer should be engaged in setting up a comprehensive system to track student progress as well as school and industry engagement.
PwC
Profile of employers
Slide 11
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Overall, 758 NYC employers participate in CTE programs in the public schools
Profile of employers
44%
46%
9%
Business Nonprofit Government
Survey Responses
Base: 233
Slide 12
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Base: 733
Identified Employer Partners
45%
41%
14%
Business Nonprofit Government
PwC
23%
17%
9%
13%
19%
3%
8%
14%
7%
15%
13%
5%
0% 50% 100%
Other
Non-profit
Education
Professional Services
Government
Law/Law Enforcement
Media/Design
InformationTechnology/Computer Science
Hospitality/Tourism
Healthcare
Engineering/Science
Culinary Arts
Construction/Sustainability
Business Services and Finance
Automotive/Transportation
Arts and Humanities
Sectors represented by employer responses
Profile of employers
Slide 13
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Business Nonprofit Government
Base: 103 (Business)Base: 108 (Nonprofit)Base: 22 (Government)Note: Multi-response questionRespondents were asked to select the sector(s) with the ‘best-fit’ to their organization.
13%
37%
4%
5%
2%
1%
6%
5%
5%
14%
5%
2%
8%
4%
2%
30%
0% 50% 100%
18%
18%
5%
64%
27%
5%
9%
9%
9%
14%
5%
9%
5%
9%
9%
0% 50% 100%
PwC
Nature of partnerships
Slide 14
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Most employers are engaged directly with a school
14%
86%
24%
88%
37%
77%
Partner through anintermediary
Partner directly
0% 50% 100%
Business
Nonprofit
Government
Nature of partnerships
Q1.
Note: This is a multi-response question
Slide 15
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Base: 103 (Business)Base: 108 (Nonprofit)Base: 22 (Government)
PwC
3
2
1
5
4
2
6
5
1
7
5
8
4
5
9
13
4
5
5
3
4
4
2
3
6
3
6
1
6
5
5
4
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
0 5 10 15 20
John Bowne High School^
Urban Assembly School for Green Careers*
Urban Assembly New York Harbor School*
Urban Assembly Gateway School for Technology*
High School of Economics and Finance^
William E. Grady Career and Technical Education High School*
Aviation High School*
Brooklyn Technical High School^
Williamsburg High School for Architecture and Design*
Queens Vocational & Technical High School*
Staten Island Technical High School^
New Dorp High School^
Tottenville High School^
Thomas Edison Career and Technical Education High School*
Art and Design High School*
Ralph McKee Career and Technical Education High School*
Schools selected
Business
Nonprofit
Government
Schools with support from seven or more employers
Nature of partnerships
*CTE dedicated school ^CTE Program School
Slide 16
April 2015
Q2.
CTE Employer Survey
Base: 103 (Business)Base: 108 (Nonprofit)Base: 22 (Government)
PwC
2%
23%
15%
12%
17%
17%
21%
6%
26%
11%
16%
5%
8%
30%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Volunteers
Professional & Academic staff
Program Manager
Program Director
Community Affairs
Human resources
Foundation Staff
Business
Nonprofit
Base: 84 (Business)Base: 105 (Nonprofit)
Lead employer CTE contact
Nature of partnerships
Q2b.
Note: This is a multi-response question – chart combines survey data and key themes from employer comments
Slide 17
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
50%
9%
27%
41%
23%
64%
50%
37%
9%
49%
43%
18%
62%
56%
19%
40%
27%
29%
27%
78%
64%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Other
Volunteering boosts company morale andemployee satisfaction
Relationships with teachers and/or schooladministrators
Student interest in my company/industry
Past hires from the school(s)
To give back to my community
To prepare candidates for jobs in myindustry/company
Business
Nonprofit
Government
Philanthropy drives employer engagement
Option most frequently ranked number 1
Note: Respondents were asked to rank their THREE most important factors.
Nature of partnerships
Q2c.
Slide 18
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Base: 103 (Business)Base: 108 (Nonprofit)Base: 22 (Government)
PwC
Sample comments on reasons for engagement
Our mission is to advance the intellectual, social and artistic development of underserved students through arts-integrated education programs to close the achievement gap.
CTE schools demonstrate higher retention and graduation rates for minority youth,
Outreach to public schools will encourage minorities and economically deprived high school students to see career opportunities in our industry.
Nature of partnerships
Great Education Strategy: resulting in keeping kids in school, giving them hope for careers and good jobs, effective college prep, giving students tools of value to the industry, helping raise the future standard of living -good for the economy.
It changed my life when I did it as a kid.
Q2c.
Slide 19
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Supporting public high schools is our core mission.
Our organization has the ability to expose students to job pathways that can lead to careers
Part of our mission and vision is to prepare students and teachers for the real world with knowledge and skills to compete globally in the 21st century.
College Preparation -Students matriculate to our campus.
Help to forge linkages between high school and college,
BusinessNonprofitGovernment
PwC
Focus of CTE relationships: mentoring, internships & professional development
Nature of partnerships
Q3.
Note: The graph presents the number of times each option was selected across all schools selected at Q2
Slide 20
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
5%
3%
2%
2%
7%
2%
3%
6%
12%
10%
9%
11%
14%
14%
0% 10% 20%
Other
Endorsement of industrycredentials
Equipment Donations
Apprenticeships
Curriculum Development
Direct Financial Support
Philanthropic Giving
Program Management
Advisory Board Membership
Professional Development
Speakers
Competitions
Worksite Visits
Internships
Mentoring
Base: 601 (Business)Base: 743 Nonprofit)Base: 189 (Government)(Multi-response question: Base represents the count of total number of options selected)
Business Nonprofit Government
6%
2%
4%
10%
2%
1%
6%
5%
14%
8%
6%
7%
17%
11%
0% 10% 20%
7%
1%
1%
1%
11%
3%
6%
6%
11%
12%
7%
11%
16%
8%
0% 10% 20%
PwC
Fewer than half of employers rate key relationships as “totally effective”, suggesting much room for improvement
Nature of partnerships
Q4.
Slide 21
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
44%42%
34%
39%41%
32%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Internships Mentoring Professional Development
Business Nonprofit
% of respondents rating engagement as “totally effective”
Note: Based on top 3 activities selected by Business and Nonprofit organizations at Q3
PwC
7%
19%
38%
17%
21%
29%
8%
9%
26%
18%
34%
24%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Other
Teacher involvement in program
Strong partnerships between employers and schools
Students' desire and motivation to learn
Employers involved with 'hands on' work experience
Program structure / content enables skillsdevelopment
Business
Nonprofit
Factors that contribute to “effective” CTE partnerships
Nature of partnerships
Slide 22
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Q4b.
Base: 74 (Business) Base: 86 (Nonprofit)Note: Multicoded response; respondents asked to select reason for success for programs rated “totally or very effective”.
PwC
Note: Question asked to those who selected ‘Totally effective’ or ‘Very effective’ for any activity at Q4
Sample comments on effective CTE partnerships
Our Apprenticeship Program is a work-based learning program. Students set goals for skill development; staff make visits to the sites to support students and supervisors; students learn about professional communication, computer and other professional skills, accountability and responsibility, etc.
Students benefited from exposure to the real world experience they gained from site visits or internships.
The structure of the program - combining different approaches to learning content, working together, learning about careers through direct exchange with professionals over the course of a year-long program supports the efficacy of this program.
Nature of partnerships
Internships provide a close up detailed look at working in the field. For both students and adult mentors, the professional experience links us - we have formed a professional and emotional bond across generations and cultures that is a very positive work relationship.
Student commitment and willingness to learn. Support of the staff at the school.
Q4b.
Slide 23
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
The main attribute for success has been the students and their desire to learn. Their enthusiasm affects everyone involved and makes the program successful. The next most important attribute is the partnership and trust between the school leadership and the company. Willingness to take and incorporate feedback on both ends of the partnership leads to great collaboration and great programs for students.
Highly motivated students and technically competent teachers.
BusinessNonprofitGovernment
PwC
Sample comments on areas for improvement
Need more institutional support from the Department of Education.
No sustained levels of activity nor development of specific initiatives or feedback that is actionable.
Nature of partnerships
Work-based learning needs to be outside of school to achieve a more real world experience. In-school activities such as career panels, guest speakers, etc. can support that learning, but are secondary.
Scaling initiatives to serve all students at partner school
Q4c.
Note: Question asked to those who selected ‘Not very effective’ or ‘Not at all effective’ for any activity at Q4
Slide 24
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Worksite visits have been difficult to schedule, so there has not been one for two years. Advisory Board is weak and curriculum is not necessarily relevant.
Students should be better prepared for work experience.
Not enough real world study
BusinessNonprofit
PwC
Employers are largely involved with CTE on company time
38%
62%
27%
3%
69%
24%
9%
68%
Both
Personal time
Work time
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Business
Nonprofit
Government
Nature of partnerships
Q5.
Slide 25
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Base: 102 (Business)Base: 108 (Nonprofit)Base: 21 (Government)
PwC
14%
23%
27%
36%
14%
41%
73%
68%
12%
27%
27%
15%
7%
37%
84%
72%
6%
27%
26%
20%
14%
45%
72%
76%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Other
Apprenticeships
Professional Development of Teachers
Speakers
Competitions
Worksite Visits
Internships
Mentoring
Business
Nonprofit
Government
Practical activities and workshopsCareer support and guidanceGaining workplace and life skills
Activities that are most effective in preparing students for careers are mentoring, internships and worksite visits
Option most frequently ranked number 1
Note: Respondents were asked to rank the THREE most effective activities
Nature of partnerships
Q6.
Slide 26
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Base: 103 (Business)Base: 107 (Nonprofit)Base: 22 (Government)
PwC
Teachers are generally prepared to teach content that is relevant to today's workplace
Nature of partnerships
Q7.
Note: Question asked to ALL who selected Competitions, Speakers, Professional Development, Advisory Board Membership, Program Management or Curriculum Development at Q3.
Slide 27
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Base: 70 (Business)Base: 77 (Nonprofit)Base: 13 (Government)
3%
4%
8%
14%
23%
62%
40%
31%
31%
35%
34%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Government
Nonprofit
Business
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree
7%
N/A
8%
-
PwC
Most students have access to equipment or computer programs that are similar to what is used in the modern workplace
Nature of partnerships
Q7.
Note: Question asked to ALL who selected Competitions, Speakers, Professional Development, Advisory Board Membership, Program Management or Curriculum Development at Q3.
Slide 28
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
1%
4%
8%
10%
12%
38%
17%
23%
23%
38%
35%
31%
23%
20%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Government
Nonprofit
Business
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree
6%
N/A
10%
-
Base: 69 (Business)Base: 77 (Nonprofit)Base: 13 (Government)
PwC
Employer Engagement
Slide 29
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
32%
17%
9%
6%
61%
26%
15%
5%
7%
60%
24%
14%
5%
10%
67%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
School-based advisory boards
CTE Advisory Council
Fund for Public Schools
CTE Industry Commissions
None of the above / Don't know
Business
Nonprofit
Government
Two-thirds of employers do not engage via the infrastructure designed for that purpose, with participation as follows:
Employer Engagement
Base: 102 (Business)Base: 106 (Nonprofit)Base: 21 (Government)Note: This is a multi-response question
Q8.
Slide 30
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
4%
1%
1%
5%
2%
6%
2%
6%
11%
9%
10%
4%
3%
11%
1%
2%
3%
3%
3%
14%
7%
1%
16%
38%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
ACE Mentoring
Careers in Culinary Arts Program (C-CAP)
Exploring
Futures & Options
Green City Force
Harlem RBI
HOSA
iMentor
Junior Achievement
Justice Resource Center
National Academy Foundation (NAF)
Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship (NFTE)
NPower
PENCIL
Project Lead the Way
Scholars at work
Skills USA
Solar One
Sponsors for Educational Opportunity (SEO)
Virtual Enterprise (VE)
Year Up
Youth Build
Other (please specify)
None of the above
CTE intermediaries with largest numbers of engaged employers: Virtual Enterprise, Pencil, Junior Achievement, NAF and the Justice Resource Center
Employer Engagement
Base: 96 (Business)Base: 103 (Nonprofit)Base: 18 (Government)Note: This is a multi-response question
Q9.
Slide 31
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Business Nonprofit Government
2%
3%
1%
2%
2%
4%
4%
13%
1%
1%
4%
2%
4%
3%
1%
8%
1%
18%
60%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
6%
6%
6%
17%
6%
6%
11%
56%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
PwC
Internships
Slide 32
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
20
29
13
10
5 53 2 1
9
2 31 1
6
2 24
1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 24 25 30 35 36 40 41 45 48 50 100
Nu
mb
er
of
or
ga
niz
ati
on
s
Number of interns hosted
Business employers host the fewest CTE interns
Internships
Slide 33
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Q10.
Organizations with 20 or more interns hosted are most likely to come from the
Nonprofit sector including: ‘Healthcare’; ‘IT/Computer Science’ and ‘Arts and
Humanities’ sectors.
Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Internships’ as an activity at Q3.Note: Graph presents the distribution of interns hosted. This data is only based on respondents who provided a response to the number of interns hosted during the 2013-14 academic year.
Base: 130
7Business
10Nonprofit
Average number of interns hosted
Base: 54 Base: 62
14Government
Base: 14
The majority of organizations who host 2
interns are from the Business sector.
PwC
Almost half of internships are between 2 to 6 months
Internships
Q10c.
Slide 34
April 2015CTE Employer Survey Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Internships’ as an activity at Q3.
3%
21%
45%
26%
5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
More than 1 year
6 months - 12 months
2 months - less than 6 months
1 month - less than 2 months
Less than 1 month
Base: 58
6%
30%
44%
14%
5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Base: 70
7%
36%
43%
7%
7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%Base: 14
…and the majority of employer partners say
the length of the internship is sufficient
to be a meaningful experience to the students
PwC
Most employers find students academically well-prepared for internships
Internships
Q10b.
Slide 35
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
4%
3%
14%
18%
12%
57%
51%
60%
21%
18%
21%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Government
Nonprofit
Business
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree
9%
3%
N/A
7%
Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Internships’ as an activity at Q3.
Base: 58 (Business)Base: 68 (Nonprofit)Base: 14 (Government)
PwC
A quarter of business employers report interns lack the necessary hard skills
Internships
Q10b.
Slide 36
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
2%
1%
2%
14%
18%
21%
64%
51%
50%
14%
24%
22%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Government
Nonprofit
Business
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree
6%
3%
N/A
7%
Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Internships’ as an activity at Q3.
Base: 58 (Business)Base: 68 (Nonprofit)Base: 14 (Government)
PwC
A quarter of business employers report interns lack the soft skills to be successful in the workplace
Internships
Q10b.
Slide 37
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
3%
5%
7%
9%
21%
64%
63%
50%
21%
19%
21%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Government
Nonprofit
Business
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree
6%
3%
N/A
7%
Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Internships’ as an activity at Q3.
Base: 58 (Business)Base: 68 (Nonprofit)Base: 14 (Government)
PwC
Employers that currently have interns are generally prepared to take more
Internships
Q10b.
Slide 38
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
4%
10%
57%
34%
47%
36%
57%
38%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Government
Nonprofit
Business
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree
4%
5%
N/A
7%
Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Internships’ as an activity at Q3.
Base: 58 (Business)Base: 68 (Nonprofit)Base: 14 (Government)
PwC
40%
31%
17%
9%
5%
17%
30%
35%
23%
10%
9%
9%
71%
21%
21%
14%
14%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Paid by the employer
Paid by another source
Combination of Paid and School Credit
Received only school credit
Not paid
Don't know
Business
Nonprofit
Government
Compensation of interns is fragmented
Internships
Q10e, Q10f.
Note: Questions only asked to those who selected Paid by our organization, Combination of Paid and School Credit or Paid by another source at Q10e
Slide 39
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Hourly rate paid
Business Nonprofit Government
85% 86% 90%
Base: 38 Base: 47 Base:11
Average percentage of interns paid
Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Internships’ as an activity at Q3.
Note: This is a multi-response question
Business Nonprofit Government
$9.57 $8.73 $8.36
Base: 33 Base: 43 Base:10
Base: 58 (Business)Base: 69 (Nonprofit)Base: 14 (Government)
PwC
1 12
12 2 2
1
23
3
1
8
1
5
1 1
18
23
5
1 1 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2.50 4.00 7.00 7.15 7.25 7.50 7.65 7.75 8.00 8.25 8.50 8.75 8.87 9.00 9.35 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 12.00 12.50 13.00 15.00
Nu
mb
er
of
or
ga
niz
ati
on
s
Hourly rate paid ($US)
Organizations who pay $8.75 or more are more likely to be from the Business sector.
Payment rates of interns are uneven
Internships
Q10f.
Slide 40
April 2015CTE Employer Survey Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Internships’ as an activity at Q3.
Note: Questions only asked to those who selected Paid by your organization, Combination of Paid and School Credit or Paid by another source at Q10e.Note: Graph presents the distribution of ‘hourly rate paid ($US). This data is only based on respondents who provided response to the hourly rate paid to interns during the 2013-14 academic year.
Business average hourly rate paidNonprofit average hourly rate paidGovernment average hourly rate paid
Base: 86
NYS Minimum
wage
$8.36 $8.73 $9.57
PwC
Mentorships
Slide 41
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
7
12
7
3
9
6
23
8
43 3
1 12
1 1 1 1
0
5
10
15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 15 20 25 30 50 60 75 100 150
Nu
mb
er
of
or
ga
niz
ati
on
s
Number of mentors provided / recruited
Business employers provide an average of 31 mentors
Mentorships
Slide 42
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Q11.
Base: 77Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Mentorships’ as an activity at Q3.Note: Graph presents the distribution of number of mentors. This data is only based on respondents who provided a response to the number of mentors provided / recruited during the 2013-14 academic year. Two outliers have been removed for presentational purposes.
Average number of mentors provided / recruited
Base: 40 Base: 31
31Business
9Nonprofit
Business average
9 31
Nonprofit average
PwC
14%
31%
55%
8%
25%
67%
0% 20% 40% 60%80%100%
Don't know
No
Yes
17%
10%
5%
17%
51%
10%
19%
19%
17%
35%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Don’t know
Several times a year
Monthly
Bi-weekly
Once a week
Most mentoring involves individual, in-person, weekly or biweekly sessions
7%
9%
42%
51%
49%
86%
4%
2%
15%
15%
53%
47%
83%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Don’t know
Other
Online mentoring
Peer mentoring
In person mentoring
Group mentoring
Individual mentoring
Mentorships
Slide 43
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Q11, Q11b, Q11c, Q11d.
(Note: Multi-response question)
Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Mentorships’ as an activity at Q3.
Mentoring type Frequency type Promotion of mentorship opportunities
Base: 53 (Business)Base: 43 (Nonprofit)
Base: 52 (Business)Base: 41 (Nonprofit)
Base: 52 (Business)Base: 42 (Nonprofit)
PwC
19%
4%
15%
15%
50%
15%
19%
6%
3%
6%
19%
6%
50%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Other
Consideration of location/logisticalissues experienced by mentors
Greater support from industry
Increased support and liaison with the school
Promote mentoring opportunities
Additional funding
Additional staff/resources
Business
Nonprofit
Businesses could provide more mentors if resources were available to staff mentor programs
ChallengesMentorships
Q11e.
Slide 44
April 2015CTE Employer Survey Note: Questions only asked to those who selected ‘Mentorships’ as an activity at Q3.
Base: 32 (Business)Base: 26 (Nonprofit)Note: Multicoded response
PwC
Sample comments on expanding mentorships
The school where we mentor students is far from our office, so we end up spending a substantial amount of resources providing transportation for the students from our offices to their homes in the evenings.
Availability of employee mentors and coordinated schedules
Mentorships
A larger base of employees in the local area and perhaps new/varied opportunities for us to participate as mentors with the schools.
Q11e
Slide 45
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Financial support for mentoring meetings and social events
Willingness from employees to lead the volunteer efforts or sign up to mentor
Funds for employees to administer the mentorship
Business
Nonprofit
PwC
Hiring
Slide 46
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Hiring
Base: 99 (Business)
Q13, Q13b, Q13c
Slide 47
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
22%
44%
33%
8%
55%
37%
9%
61%
30%
Don'tknow
No
Yes
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Business Nonprofit Government
Base: 102 (Nonprofit)Base: 18 (Government)
Only a third of employer partners have an internal process in place to recruit students for employment from the CTE programs
PwC
When asked “What is the main reason you don’t recruit students from the CTE programs?”, lack of internal capacity to hire and need for more experienced hires were most common responses
25%
2%
9%
9%
55%
42%
2%
4%
14%
39%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Other
Students do not have adequate skills in order to beconsidered for hiring
My company requires potential employees to have at least anAssociate degree
My company requires potential employees to have at least a Bachelor’s degree
No capacity to hire at this time
Business
Nonprofit
(Note: Only asked to those who selected ‘No’ at Q13)
Hiring
Slide 48
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Base: 57 (Business)Base: 55 (Nonprofit)
Q13d.
PwC
Sample “Other” reasons CTE employers don’t hire students from the CTE programs
Hiring
Q13d.
Slide 49
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
We recruit over 600 interns from colleges with needed educational courses to assign to clients and work. High school internships are limited and focused on giving back to the community and student pursuit of higher education.
The work is physically demanding and I would be concerned about safety in hiring a high school age student. I would also be concerned about long term commitment, and would a high school graduate commit to a minimum of 2 years?
Limited roles in NYC due to non-headquarters location and types of jobs in NYC.
In some areas, a BA is required. In others, we hire union employees so students must go through that process independently. For in-house staff, it's just something that hasn't been pushed.
Need qualifications for state exams (degrees). For most positions, a person is required to take an exam. They will need to qualify first (a degree may be required)
Students have not completed high school yet
BusinessNonprofitGovernment
PwC
Most jobs require a Bachelors degree or higher
Note: Multi-response question - respondents could select up to TWO options only
Hiring
6%
17%
11%
11%
11%
39%
61%
4%
5%
6%
8%
11%
49%
62%
8%
5%
16%
18%
28%
25%
53%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Associates Degree
PhD
Technical Certification
Professional degree (JD, MD, etc)
High School Degree
Masters Degree
Bachelors Degree
Business
Nonprofit
Government
Q14.
Slide 50
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Base: 97 (Business)Base: 101 (Nonprofit)Base: 18 (Government)
PwC
Challenges
Slide 51
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Over a third of employers disagree when asked if CTE schools and programs are adequately funded
Challenges
Q15.
Slide 52
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
7%
9%
17%
26%
27%
61%
43%
34%
6%
4%
13%
6%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Government
Nonprofit
Business
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree
15%
N/A
20%
11%
Base: 98 (Business)Base: 100 (Nonprofit)Base: 18 (Government)
PwC
Fewer than half employers surveyed believe that CTE schools and programs are adequately connected to the industry
Challenges
Q15.
Slide 53
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
14%
N/A
12%
6%
Base: 97 (Business)Base: 100 (Nonprofit)Base: 18 (Government)
1%
2%
6%
13%
20%
44%
33%
27%
33%
33%
35%
11%
8%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Government
Nonprofit
Business
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree
PwC
50%
19%
25%
25%
13%
25%
19%
19%
50%
0% 50% 100%
26%
6%
11%
9%
13%
19%
19%
22%
39%
61%
0% 50% 100%
33%
5%
10%
10%
22%
17%
18%
40%
31%
55%
0% 50% 100%
Other
Discipline problems among students
Curriculum does not reflect current employerrequirements
Lack of student interest
No one person owns the relationship within myorganization
Inadequate commitment of resources within myorganization
Students unprepared for work experience
Lack of clarity on expectations/excessiveexpectations
Cost of offering work-based learningopportunities
Overall bureaucracy and slow response time
All employers say that bureaucracy and slow response time are the biggest challenges in CTE work
Note: Respondents were asked to rank their THREE biggest challenges.
Challenges
Q16.
Slide 54
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Business Nonprofit Government
Base: 88 (Business)Base: 95 (Nonprofit)Base: 16 (Government)
Option most frequently ranked number 1
PwC
BusinessNonprofitGovernment
Sample comments on the challenges that employers encounter with CTE partnerships
Funding to make this a sustainable initiative
We are a professional services organization and due to the confidentiality of our work for our clients, we are limited to the number of high school internships we can offer.
1. Lack of teacher time and support to focus on CTE and financial educational content.
2. Lack of flexibility at school leadership level to adopt new programs.
Challenges
There has been a lack of good communication with the school with both the employer and the students
Computer forensics is a highly skilled discipline, so even at the most basic levels interns would need a very advanced knowledge of computing. We are working toward that with our curriculum but we're not there yet.
Q16.
Slide 55
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Lack of follow up to cultivating new private sector revenue streams.
Leadership and faculty of school are overwhelmed by other issues.
Contractual and Legal challenges
No clear understanding of rules of engagement or one point of contact
Funding (more should be offered to schools)
PwC
3%
4%
1%
4%
3%
11%
1%
7%
5%
32%
16%
33%
8%
2%
5%
7%
5%
3%
13%
5%
20%
15%
20%
8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Other
Better attendance / commitment from students participating
Flexibility in roles for students/working styles for students
Establishing a formal partnership
Raising the profile of CTE programs
Improve process of matching students to placements
A corresponding expansion in the size of my business
Greater level of support/training
No need - already committed/program meets needs
Improved resources and infrastructure (including additionalstaff)
Improved planning, communication and organization
Additional funding/financial incentives
Business
Nonprofit
Expanded employer commitment to CTE would require better planning, communication, organization and more resources
Challenges
Slide 56
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Q17.
Base: 61 (Business)Base: 75(Nonprofit)Note: Multicoded response
PwC
Networking event or group email so I can learn about other CTE programs.
Business sector sample comments on potential expansion of CTE commitments
Commitments are made by individual employees and/or business units. The firm will support their efforts but employees must be willing to make the commitment.
Establishing clearly defined programs supported by a contract with the NYCDOE.
More seamless & efficient on-boarding process for mentors.
Structured, in-depth partnerships where industry is involved at both the policy and philanthropic levels.
Challenges
1. Better facilities at the school to carry out a curriculum relevant to our industry
2. Proven track record with curriculum success; i.e. more students who are demonstrably good at the work that is relevant to our industry. We are making progress in this area, but we have a way to go still.
Q17.
Slide 57
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Increased discussion about importance and effectiveness of working with students to prepare them for workplace experience.
Good planning and scheduling. Partners need better communication and clear goals.
We would need students to have a baseline computer forensic knowledge to do basic lab work. Things like imaging hard drives, processing them, preparing acquisition documentation and inventory documentation accurately, all of which are more suited to college level students.
Better coordination with the NYCDOE. More realistic expectations. Internships are very difficult to fund and organize. There should be other roles that industry partners can play without having to sign up for dozens of internships. Internship opportunities should be managed separately. The emphasis should be on qualifying students for opportunities that are available throughout the city.
PwC
If there was an increased expectation among school leaders and parents that students must make time for these type of opportunities, this will help student participation levels, especially at low-performing and underserved schools. Too often, these opportunities go to the already high-achieving student versus serving the student that really needs the added level of support and access. Working with these students can be challenging and often professionals have limited time and patience in dealing with teenagers that do not yet have the cultural literacy of an office environment.
Nonprofit sector sample comments on potential expansion of CTE commitments
Funding to hire interns through DOE. It is hard to put in the time to train interns, let alone high school interns. It's a hard sell.
Quicker response time and placement of students
We really just need more interaction with the school. It has gotten to the point where we are ready, willing and able to offer more, we only hear from the school when it is time to interview the potential interns.
Funding to pay the students and overhead for their internships
Challenges
Release time for teachers at school to work with us to develop joint projects. We'll go to them. Teachers and administrators are really, really hard-working and put in lots of free overtime as it is. They need better on-site support.
Q17.
Slide 58
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
More regular meetings between partner organizations, better communication, and a more formal vetting process of students.
Clear understanding of engagement options and its effectiveness as well as commitment requirements
We would need a better internal strategic plan and commitment from each school as to how to exactly partner going forward. More resources to allow for an
effective intermediary to scale up their programs
PwC
Government sector summary of comments on potential expansion of CTE commitments
Personal interest from the Mayor of NYC.
The reduced federal budget limits the availability of federal technical staff.
Challenges
Faster, more competent/ organized response from the DOE for help with the issues we have been encountering in the partnership (CTE teacher/ certification, facilities/ shop construction.) These have really been a burden on our partnership.
Q17.
Slide 59
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Letting more people know the program exists.
Create pathways between high school and associate degree programs.
Better and more faculty to work specifically with the CTE High School
Starting a middle school CTE law program as a pipeline to high school.
There are many competing programs already in place. The Judicial Circuit needs to develop a more cohesive approach in order to implement a universal educational program throughout the courts of the Judicial Circuit. Templates for programming are necessary as they will make it easier for judges to make the time to participate. We need to increase staffing and program resources in order to support more student visits.
PwC
Appendix – Overview of School Survey Findings
Slide 60
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
PwC
Key findings – School Survey
• There was a 90% response rate to the survey by CTE schools and schools with CTE programs.
• A total of 120,000 New York City high school students (40%) are enrolled in CTE classes or programs.
o Fifty-one of New York City’s 400 high schools, with 26,000 enrolled students, are dedicated to Career and Technical Education.
o Another 88 traditional high schools offer a total of 300 CTE programs.*
o Citywide, schools identify 758* employers engaged with CTE, of which 333 are businesses and the rest are nonprofits and government agencies.
o Over 50 nonprofit intermediary organizations are directly servicing CTE schools & programs, with 20 most frequently highly rated from educators and employers.
o 18 CTE schools report no current employer or nonprofit service provider engagement.
* Note: Data provided by the NYC DOE.
** Note: 490 employers were reported directly by schools, the balance were reported by NYC DOE and intermediary organizations for a total of 758 employers.
April 2015Appendix: Overview of School Survey Findings
Slide 61
PwC
Key findings – School Survey • 2,004 students earned a CTE-endorsed diploma in the 2013-14 school year.
o 1,329 graduates of CTE dedicated schools got a CTE-endorsed diploma, compared to 675 graduates of traditional high schools offering CTE programs.
o Students earn CTE-endorsed diplomas by passing an exam in one of 13 categories established under state law: culinary, automotive, computer repair, electronics technician, network administration, metal working, graphics, carpentry, business, advertising & design, accounting, agricultural mechanics and hospitality management.
• 1,575 students were placed in an internship last year, of which 60% were paid positions.
o Among CTE dedicated schools, 748 students were placed in an internship and 76% were paid; in schools with CTE program(s), 827 students were placed in an internship and 53% were paid.
o Students must have strong recommendations and grades in order to be placed in an internship.
• Private sector employers on average do not take more than a few interns from CTE schools and programs each year regardless of the size of company.
o The 5 schools with the most interns rely on employers such as Park Avenue Armory, Center for Arts Education and NY Presbyterian Hospital.
April 2015Appendix: Overview of School Survey Findings
Slide 62
PwC
Key findings – School Survey
• The majority of CTE dedicated schools and CTE programs stated that teachers are well prepared, 71% and 72% respectively.
• Ninety-four percent of CTE dedicated schools value engagement by employers, compared to 87% of respondents from schools with CTE programs.
• Respondents believe the skills CTE students are learning are relevant to today’s workplace.
o Ninety-four percent of respondents from CTE dedicated schools agree that participation in a CTE program contributes to the success of students post-graduation, compared to 90% of respondents from schools with CTE programs.
• Ninety-two percent of CTE dedicated schools have a relationship with a post-secondary institution.
o The most common types of activities include campus tours, transferable credits and access to college courses.
.
April 2015Appendix: Overview of School Survey Findings
Slide 63
PwC
Key findings – School Survey
• Respondents from CTE dedicated schools and schools with CTE programs were generally in agreement about the overall importance of CTE.
o Ninety percent of CTE dedicated schools report that CTE is deeply embedded in the culture of their school, compared to 61% at schools with CTE programs.
o Eighty-six percent of respondents from CTE dedicated schools believe that academic work and technical skills training could be better integrated, compared to 65% of respondents from schools with CTE programs.
• Most CTE schools have an employer advisory board, but few meet regularly.
o Respondents report better input from new CTE Industry Commissions.
• Most schools do not effectively track employer relationships.
o Only 47% of CTE dedicated schools and 28% of schools with CTE programs track employer engagement and student work experiences using an electronic database.
April 2015Appendix: Overview of School Survey Findings
Slide 64
PwC
Key findings – School Survey • Most work-based learning coordinators (staff responsible for employer engagement)
are teaching a full class load.
o Schools lack resources to recruit and manage employer relationships and internships for students.
• Nonprofit intermediary groups are filling the gap in some CTE schools and with many programs.
o Most active intermediaries include Skills USA, National Academy Foundation (NAF), PENCIL, Justice Resource Center and Virtual Enterprise.
o Schools and employers believe the involvement of a nonprofit intermediary is important.
• Mentoring is the second most valued employer contribution (after internships).
o Nineteen employers and 25 non-profits carry out mentoring programs in CTE dedicated schools.
o Forty three employers and 52 non-profits carry out mentoring programs in schools with CTE programs.
• Of the schools involved in a mentoring activity with employers, 80% of mentoring takes place at least monthly. Group mentoring is common.
April 2015CTE Employer Survey
Slide 65
"This document has been prepared only for Partnership for New York City and solely for the purpose and on the terms agreed with Partnership for New York City in our agreement dated 10.09.2014. We accept no liability (including for negligence) to anyone else in connection with this document, and it may not be provided to anyone else.”
“This is a draft prepared for discussion purposes only and should not be relied upon; the contents are subject to amendment or withdrawal and our final conclusions and findings will be set out in our final deliverable”
CONFIDENTIAL
©2015 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. 'PricewaterhouseCoopers' refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (a limited liability partnership in the United Kingdom) or, as the context requires, the PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.