1
POSTER PRESENTATION Open Access Cardiac magnetic resonance adenosine perfusion at 3 Tesla is superior to 1.5 Tesla for detection of relevant coronary artery stenosis Peter Bernhardt * , Robert Gradinger, Thomas Walcher, Wolfgang Rottbauer From 2011 SCMR/Euro CMR Joint Scientific Sessions Nice, France. 3-6 February 2011 Background Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) including adenosine perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at 1.5 Tesla (T) has been established for noninva- sive detection of relevant coronary artery disease (CAD). However, little is known about the potential advantages of 3.0-T to detect CAD. The aim of our prospective study was to compare a compiled clinical routine CMR protocol performed at both 1.5-T and 3.0-T in patients with suspected CAD undergoing coronary x-ray angiography. Methods Fifty-two patients (62.3 ± 10.2 years) with suspected CAD referred for coronary x-ray angiography were included into the study. All patients were scanned at both 1.5-T and 3.0-T including functional imaging, ade- nosine stress and rest perfusion, and LGE imaging. CMR images were analyzed by two blinded readers in consensus. A significant CAD was diagnosed by quanti- tative coronary analysis. Two thresholds of >50% and >70% stenosis in coronary arteries with a diameter of >2mm were chosen. Results Diagnostic accuracy of the combined analysis of perfu- sion and LGE imaging yielded better values at 1.5-T and 3.0-T than the analysis of perfusion images alone. Sensi- tivity and specificity at 3.0-T was superior to 1.5-T in detection of coronary stenoses >50% (0.87 vs. 0.77 and 0.91 vs. 0.76) and >70% (0.96 vs. 0.89 and 0.92 vs. 0.80). Area under receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve was higher for detection of coronary stenoses in the left anterior descending and left circumflex artery at 3.0-T in comparison to 1.5-T, but not in the right coronary artery. Conclusions This study showed that CMR at 3.0-T in a routine clini- cal setting is superior to 1.5-T in detection of significant CAD. 3.0-T might become the preferred CMR field strength for evaluation of CAD in clinical practice. Published: 2 February 2011 doi:10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P97 Cite this article as: Bernhardt et al.: Cardiac magnetic resonance adenosine perfusion at 3 Tesla is superior to 1.5 Tesla for detection of relevant coronary artery stenosis. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011 13(Suppl 1):P97. Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: Convenient online submission Thorough peer review No space constraints or color figure charges Immediate publication on acceptance Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar Research which is freely available for redistribution Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany Bernhardt et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011, 13(Suppl 1):P97 http://jcmr-online.com/content/13/S1/P97 © 2011 Bernhardt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Cardiac magnetic resonance adenosine perfusion at 3 Tesla is superior to 1.5 Tesla for detection of relevant coronary artery stenosis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

POSTER PRESENTATION Open Access

Cardiac magnetic resonance adenosine perfusionat 3 Tesla is superior to 1.5 Tesla for detection ofrelevant coronary artery stenosisPeter Bernhardt*, Robert Gradinger, Thomas Walcher, Wolfgang Rottbauer

From 2011 SCMR/Euro CMR Joint Scientific SessionsNice, France. 3-6 February 2011

BackgroundCardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) includingadenosine perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement(LGE) at 1.5 Tesla (T) has been established for noninva-sive detection of relevant coronary artery disease (CAD).However, little is known about the potential advantagesof 3.0-T to detect CAD. The aim of our prospectivestudy was to compare a compiled clinical routine CMRprotocol performed at both 1.5-T and 3.0-T in patientswith suspected CAD undergoing coronary x-rayangiography.

MethodsFifty-two patients (62.3 ± 10.2 years) with suspectedCAD referred for coronary x-ray angiography wereincluded into the study. All patients were scanned atboth 1.5-T and 3.0-T including functional imaging, ade-nosine stress and rest perfusion, and LGE imaging.CMR images were analyzed by two blinded readers inconsensus. A significant CAD was diagnosed by quanti-tative coronary analysis. Two thresholds of >50% and>70% stenosis in coronary arteries with a diameter of>2mm were chosen.

ResultsDiagnostic accuracy of the combined analysis of perfu-sion and LGE imaging yielded better values at 1.5-T and3.0-T than the analysis of perfusion images alone. Sensi-tivity and specificity at 3.0-T was superior to 1.5-T indetection of coronary stenoses >50% (0.87 vs. 0.77 and0.91 vs. 0.76) and >70% (0.96 vs. 0.89 and 0.92 vs. 0.80).Area under receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curvewas higher for detection of coronary stenoses in the left

anterior descending and left circumflex artery at 3.0-Tin comparison to 1.5-T, but not in the right coronaryartery.

ConclusionsThis study showed that CMR at 3.0-T in a routine clini-cal setting is superior to 1.5-T in detection of significantCAD. 3.0-T might become the preferred CMR fieldstrength for evaluation of CAD in clinical practice.

Published: 2 February 2011

doi:10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P97Cite this article as: Bernhardt et al.: Cardiac magnetic resonanceadenosine perfusion at 3 Tesla is superior to 1.5 Tesla for detection ofrelevant coronary artery stenosis. Journal of Cardiovascular MagneticResonance 2011 13(Suppl 1):P97.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Centraland take full advantage of:

• Convenient online submission

• Thorough peer review

• No space constraints or color figure charges

• Immediate publication on acceptance

• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

• Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit

University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Bernhardt et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011, 13(Suppl 1):P97http://jcmr-online.com/content/13/S1/P97

© 2011 Bernhardt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.