“Carbon Nanotubes for Interconnect Applications”

  • Upload
    bridie

  • View
    37

  • Download
    8

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

“Carbon Nanotubes for Interconnect Applications”. Franz Kreupl, Andrew P. Graham, Maik Liebau, Georg S. Duesberg, Robert Seidel, Eugen Unger Presented at IEDM 2004. EE C235 Presentation by Zachery Jacobson March 5, 2007. Outline. Overview of Interconnects Why Carbon Nanotube interconnects? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • Carbon Nanotubes for Interconnect ApplicationsFranz Kreupl, Andrew P. Graham, Maik Liebau, Georg S. Duesberg, Robert Seidel, Eugen Unger

    Presented at IEDM 2004EE C235 Presentation by Zachery JacobsonMarch 5, 2007

  • OutlineOverview of InterconnectsWhy Carbon Nanotube interconnects?Growth strategiesResultsIssuesConclusions

  • Overview of InterconnectsIncreased resistance and decreased current carrying capability due to electromigration are two critical issues affecting the use of copper interconnectsRon Ho, SLIP 2005ITRS Roadmap, 2005

  • Why Carbon Nanotube Interconnects?Metallic Carbon Nanotubes are potentially viable for use as interconnects due to their large mean-free path (which leads to low resistance) and low electromigration (which increases current carrying capability)A. Naeemi, et al, IEDM 2004F. Kreupl, et al, IEDM 2004

  • Growth StrategiesTwo major growth strategiesBottom-up, where CNTs are grown before ILD depositionBuried catalyst, where CNTs are grown after ILD deposition

    J. Li, et al, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2491 (2003)F. Kreupl, et al, IEDM 2004

  • ResultsNanotube quality is better than PECVD grown nanotubes, but variability is still highF. Kreupl, et al, IEDM 2004

  • ResultsRelatively high annealing temperature needed to reduce resistance due to contact issuesLarge variability in resistance between viasF. Kreupl, et al, IEDM 2004

  • IssuesContact resistance eliminates any advantage seen versus bulk Cu interconnectsTo make a good low resistance contact, high annealing temperatures are required which exceed the thermal budgetVariability of grown nanotubes continues to be an issueLarge diameter nanotubes underperform Cu vias even under ideal conditions

    F. Kreupl, et al, IEDM 2004

  • ConclusionsCarbon Nanotubes have theoretically higher performance than Copper interconnects in some applicationsUsing a buried catalyst method, vias were fabricated using single MWCNTs down to 20 nm in diameterVariability was high among the nanowires grown, which has a strong effect on performanceIf good contacts can be achieved with a low temperature process, carbon nanotubes have a chance at replacing copper vias at very small process nodes

    Thank you for your time! Questions?