Captain Andy Baan - dodccrp.org“Non-CCA Issues” (e.g. Logistics, Targeting) Systems Modeling (Causal Mapping) Immersive Briefing Wargaming C2CC Critical Thinking Plans (Resources

Concept DevelopmentConcept Development& Experimentation& Experimentation

“COM as Shooter”Operational Planning using C2

for Confronting and Collaborating

Captain Andy BaanCaptain Andy Baan

COM as Shooter

TWO

ANTENNAE

COM as Shooter

Success

‘Wait. We should not have to answer these questions! We have never been asked

for this information before.’- AFNORTH participant

COM as Shooter

CCA supports EBOPurpose of EBO Mission is accomplished when behavior is shaped so that intentions are in compliance

COM as Shooter

HistoryWellington Modern Warfare Peace Support Operations, COM is the Shooter. The COM determines the message

Must know everythingCOM must ensure the message is consistent up and down the chain

C2CC’s Purpose

COM as Shooter

C2CC

Internal CC System External CC System

P1 P2 f

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

P1 P2 f

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

TheaterCommander

DivisionCommander

DivisionCommander

BrigadeCommander

BrigadeCommander

BrigadeCommander

Secure e-mail perimeterP1 P2 f

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

P1 P2 f

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

CA Party

option A

option B

CA Party

option A

option B

option C

NationalAgency

RegionalAgency

RegionalAgency

LocalAgency

LocalAgency

LocalAgency

NationalAgency

RegionalAgency

RegionalAgency

LocalAgency

LocalAgency

LocalAgency

NationalAgency

RegionalAgency

RegionalAgency

LocalAgency

LocalAgency

LocalAgency

COM as Shooter

CCA PROCESS

COM as Shooter

Six Phases of an Interactive EpisodeScene-settingBuild-upIf positions agree, then Collaboration, Decision If positions disagree, then Confrontation then DecisionImplementation

COM as Shooter

COM as Shooter

ExampleOptions Board showing ConfrontationTug of War for ConfrontationOptions Board showing CollaborationTug of War for Collaboration

COM as Shooter

PI P+A f I

PALESTINIANS

stop terrorism

recognize/accept Israel

ARAB STATES

fund terrorism


ISRAEL

accept “viable” Palestinian state

raid/suppress Palestinians

accept minimal Palestinian state

??

??

??

??

??

??

??

??

??

COM as Shooter

Palestinians

Arabs

Israel

Israel blocks Palestinian state

P/A do Terror

Israeli position =Israeli domination without terrorism


f = Terror and suppression


Palestinian/Arab position =

Palestinian state


Palestinian state

P/A do Terror

Palestinians

ArabsArabs

IsraelIsrael

Israel blocks Palestinian stateIsrael blocks Palestinian state

P/A do TerrorP/A do Terror






Palestinian state


Palestinian state

P/A do TerrorP/A do Terror

COM as ShooterPI a r(P+A) r(I)

PALESTINIANS

stop terrorism


ARAB STATES

fund terrorism


ISRAEL

negotiate Palestinian state

progressively abandon settlements

expand settlements

??

??

??

??

??

raid/suppress West Bank/Gaza

??

??

COM as Shooter

Israel fails to negotiate Palestinian state or abandon settlements

Palestinians and Arabs return to terrorism and cease to recognize Israel

r(P+A) = Terror,no Palestinian

State


State

r(I) = Terror, no Palestinian

State


State

Agreement =Palestinian state

and peace


and peace

Israel fails to negotiate Palestinian state or abandon settlementsIsrael fails to negotiate Palestinian state or abandon settlements

Palestinians and Arabs return to terrorism and cease to recognize IsraelPalestinians and Arabs return to terrorism and cease to recognize Israel


State


State


State


State


and peace


and peace

COM as Shooter

AFNORTH TrialPart of Allied Action 03 Planning ProcessParticipants included 3-star General, staff including POLAD, LEGAL, CIMICTraining session preceded workThree models

COM as Shooter

Parties We AnalyzedFriendsFoesNeutrals

All three are required to agree to achieve compliance

COM as Shooter

AFNORTH Trial OutcomesSuccess- Demonstrated need to create national/political problems as injectsSuccess- Demonstrated issues overlap Success- Demonstrated the benefit of COM’s participation, an intention of C2CC

COM as Shooter

Insights GainedDon’t be too ambitiousAdequate training of facilitator and staff is important to get the most benefitNew processes need to be injected into the training process all along the career path i.e. difficult to do training andimmediately use system all at one

COM as Shooter

The FutureWorking with JFCOM

Appears that C2CC and ONA are mutually reinforcing

Additional experimentsOngoing analysisSoftware and training manuals

COM as Shooter

RedView

“Green”View

BlueView

RedView

“Green”View

BlueView

“Non-CCA Issues”(e.g. Logistics, Targeting)

Systems Modeling(Causal Mapping)

“Non-CCA Issues”(e.g. Logistics, Targeting)

Systems Modeling(Causal Mapping)

Immersive Briefing

Wargaming

C2CC

Critical Thinking

Plans(Resources to Effects)

Decisive Points

Desired Effects

CCALegend

Collaborativeenvironment

Modelrepository

LegendCollaborativeenvironment

Modelrepository

Formal analysis

Formal analysis

Formal analysis

COM as Shooter

QUESTIONS?

Captain Andy BaanCaptain Andy Baan

COM as Shooter

PSO RemindersCOM needs to be fully informed and engagedGoal is to change intention of parties because mission does not end until parties realize that their desired end-state is the international community’s proclaimed end-state

COM as Shooter

“COM as Shooter”Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and CollaboratingCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as ShooterCOM as Shooter

Documents

Captain Andy Baan - dodccrp.org“Non-CCA Issues” (e.g. Logistics, Targeting) Systems Modeling (Causal Mapping) Immersive Briefing Wargaming C2CC Critical Thinking Plans (Resources