52
CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report Data Year: 2006 Date Released: June 1, 2007 Abbott Laboratories JEA Aera Energy LLC L.A. County Metro Transportation Authority Ameren Services LMC Properties, Inc. American Electric Power Company, Inc. Lyondell Chemical Company Arizona Public Service Company MTA NYC Transit BASF Corporation NiSource Corporate Services BC Hydro & Power Authority Nokia Inc Belgacom SA NOVA Chemicals Corporation BellSouth Corporation Ontario Lottery & Gaming Corporation Bierlein/DaimlerChrysler Pacific Gas and Electric Company BP West Coast Products LLC Pfizer Inc. Campbell Soup Company Phelps Dodge Mining Co. Caterpillar Inc. Portland General Electric Company City of Calgary Progress Energy, Inc. ConocoPhillips PSEG Services Corporation Consumers Energy Corporation Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. Dallas Area Rapid Transit Sempra Energy DCP, Midstream, LP Shell Canada Limited Dofasco Inc. Sierra Pacific Power Company Dominion Resources Services, Inc. Southern California Edison Company DTE Energy State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Duquesne Light Company STP Nuclear Operating Company Eastman Chemical Company Suncor Energy Inc. Eastman Kodak Company Target Corporation Eli Lilly and Company The Dow Chemical Company Exelon Corporation The Procter & Gamble Company First Energy Corporation TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. Florida Power & Light Company U.S. Postal Service General Dynamics C4 Systems Valero Energy Corporation General Motors Corporation Verizon Communications Inc. Hospira Inc We Energies Husky Oil Operations Limited Westar Energy, Inc Idaho Power Company Weyerhaeuser Company International Paper Company Wisconsin Public Service Corp. J.R. Simplot Company Xcel Energy Inc. A. Total 1,036,920,414,513 $ Average 18,853,098,446 $ Median 11,000,000,000 $ Range 265,000,000 $ to $91,833,000,000 B. # Companies Reported this Data IR Program Management 70 Centralized 90.00% Decentralized 10.00% IR Operations/Services 61 Centralized 57.38% Decentralized 42.62% The following companies provided data for this study: Sales (in dollars): Percent of companies that use the following organizational structure to perform the Investment Recovery function: Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University. All rights reserved. 1

CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Date Released: June 1, 2007

Abbott Laboratories JEAAera Energy LLC L.A. County Metro Transportation AuthorityAmeren Services LMC Properties, Inc.American Electric Power Company, Inc. Lyondell Chemical CompanyArizona Public Service Company MTA NYC TransitBASF Corporation NiSource Corporate ServicesBC Hydro & Power Authority Nokia IncBelgacom SA NOVA Chemicals CorporationBellSouth Corporation Ontario Lottery & Gaming CorporationBierlein/DaimlerChrysler Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyBP West Coast Products LLC Pfizer Inc.Campbell Soup Company Phelps Dodge Mining Co.Caterpillar Inc. Portland General Electric CompanyCity of Calgary Progress Energy, Inc.ConocoPhillips PSEG Services CorporationConsumers Energy Corporation Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.Dallas Area Rapid Transit Sempra EnergyDCP, Midstream, LP Shell Canada LimitedDofasco Inc. Sierra Pacific Power CompanyDominion Resources Services, Inc. Southern California Edison CompanyDTE Energy State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDuquesne Light Company STP Nuclear Operating CompanyEastman Chemical Company Suncor Energy Inc.Eastman Kodak Company Target CorporationEli Lilly and Company The Dow Chemical CompanyExelon Corporation The Procter & Gamble CompanyFirst Energy Corporation TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.Florida Power & Light Company U.S. Postal ServiceGeneral Dynamics C4 Systems Valero Energy CorporationGeneral Motors Corporation Verizon Communications Inc.Hospira Inc We EnergiesHusky Oil Operations Limited Westar Energy, IncIdaho Power Company Weyerhaeuser CompanyInternational Paper Company Wisconsin Public Service Corp.J.R. Simplot Company Xcel Energy Inc.

A.

Total 1,036,920,414,513$ Average 18,853,098,446$ Median 11,000,000,000$ Range 265,000,000$ to $91,833,000,000

B. # Companies Reported this Data

IR Program Management 70Centralized 90.00%Decentralized 10.00%

IR Operations/Services 61Centralized 57.38%Decentralized 42.62%

The following companies provided data for this study:

Sales (in dollars):

Percent of companies that use the following organizational structure to perform the Investment Recovery function:

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

1

Page 2: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Date Released: June 1, 2007

C. 69 Companies Reported this Data

North America (NAFTA) 79.71%Global 20.29%

D. 70 Companies Reported this Data

CEO/President 0.00%Executive V.P. 0.00%Vice President 14.29%Director 28.57%Manager 44.29%Supervisor 10.00%Other: 2.86%

CFO; VP Purchasing

E. 70 Companies Reported this Data

Supply/Purchasing/Sourcing/Materials Management 81.43%2.86%

Maintenance 1.43%Operations 7.14%Environmental 2.86%Other: 4.29%

Asset VP; Resource Management; Legal

F. 70 Companies Reported this Data

Aerospace & Defense 2.86%Chemical/Fertilizer 7.14%Consumer Products 2.86%

0.00%Food 1.43%Forest Products 2.86%Government 2.86%Metals & Mining 2.86%Oil & Gas 12.86%

5.71%Telecommunications 5.71%Transportation 5.71%Utilities 38.57%Other: 7.14%

Automotive; Financial Services; Gaming; Heavy Equipment; Retail

Electronics

Pharmaceuticals

Type of Industry that best describes each company:

Geographic areas to which Investment Recovery services are provided:

Investment Recovery directly reports to:

Functional area Investment Recovery directly reports to:

Finance/Controller

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

2

Page 3: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Date Released: June 1, 2007

G. 68 Companies Reported this Data

H. 70 Companies Reported this Data

Tool Average Rating Expected Change in Use

Auctions 2.82 Increase 25.76%Decrease 4.55%No Change 69.70%

Catalogs 1.38 Increase 7.27%Decrease 0.00%No Change 92.73%

Commercial Ads 1.40 Increase 10.91%Decrease 1.82%No Change 87.27%

eAuctions 2.48 Increase 45.76%Decrease 6.78%No Change 47.46%

Email 4.05 Increase 39.06%Decrease 3.13%No Change 57.81%

Fax 3.10 Increase 14.75%Decrease 16.39%No Change 68.85%

Flyers/Mailers 1.96 Increase 14.81%Decrease 5.56%No Change 79.63%

Internet posting 2.83 Increase 55.17%Decrease 1.72%No Change 43.10%

Intranet 3.25 Increase 50.79%Decrease 0.00%No Change 49.21%

Telemarketing 1.95 Increase 9.26%Decrease 3.70%No Change 87.04%

3rd-party Sellers or Brokers 2.76 Increase 42.86%Decrease 1.59%No Change 55.56%

I. 40 Companies Reported this Data

Incentives provided by companies to operating units/businesses to identify and release surplus assets for redeployment and sale:

Ability to credit recovered funds against capital project costs; Ability to write down proceeds against general revenue; All capital dollar expenditures and sales greater than $5,000 are returned to the business units; All revenue/Fair Market Value less administration & selling costs are returned to the business unit, Assets are transferred off their books. The corporation picks up any losses or gains; Depreciate to $0; Feedback on "bottom line" results; No acquisition cost for receiver of surplus; None; Recognition of the area releasing the material for sale; Sales revenue goes into their capital pool to use on approved projects; Salvage allocations to offset cost of removal; The monies go back to their retirement work orders or accounts; The sooner departments release their surplus equipment, the sooner they stop being charged for it

The most productive tool used for the disposition of assets: (A rating of 1 indicates least used and 5 indicates most used.)

On average, the IR function serviced 71 company locations or facilities

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

3

Page 4: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Date Released: June 1, 2007

J. 69 Companies Reporte this Data

Primary Service Provided

Service Occasionally Provided Service Not Provided

Appraisals 21.21% 53.03% 25.76%Co-Product/Waste stream management 36.92% 32.31% 30.77%Dismantling/Demolition 32.31% 46.15% 21.54%Product reclamation 44.62% 24.62% 30.77%Recycling 60.29% 29.41% 10.29%Redeployment 78.46% 18.46% 3.08%Sales (material & equipment) 92.75% 5.80% 1.45%Used equipment searches 37.31% 41.79% 20.90%Other 19.23% 7.69% 73.08%

Investment Recovery services provided:

High voltage testing; Internal consulting services; On-site training to client departments; Project management; Offset and SDB support; Reporting; Sarbanes Oxley obsolescence requirements; SOX Compliance; Web site management (internal and external)

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

4

Page 5: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Financial Information

1 Total cost benefit $12,816,425 $18,800,377 $14,000 $260,568,112 $6,572,098 64

2 Total cost benefit as a percent of total company sales 0.49% 0.13% 0.01% 0.76% 0.07% 54

3 Total cost benefit as a percent of sales attributed to business segments served 0.74% 0.13% 0.01% 1.00% 0.09% 46

4 Total cost benefit dollars to operating expense dollars 22 30 3 222 17 51

5 Total cost benefit dollars per transaction $16,959 $22,519 $560 $105,000 $14,307 50

6 Total cost benefit provided by each investment recovery employee $2,207,984 $3,427,328 $14,000 $45,350,000 $2,043,808 60

7 Total cost benefit provided by each exempt investment recovery employee $3,650,689 $5,825,056 $14,000 $45,350,000 $3,470,625 52

8 Investment recovery gross third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 57.10% 27.79% 0.17% 98.19% 19.05% 33

9 Net third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 48.55% 24.59% 0.14% 90.45% 17.86% 33

10 Gross sales dollars as a percent of total cost benefit 66.18% 72.71% 0.00% 100.00% 84.78% 64

Internal transfers/redeployment activity as a percent of total cost benefit 35.21% 18.48% 0.00% 100.00% 6.18% 63

Other cost avoidance as a percent of total cost benefit 18.23% 9.24% 0.00% 94.47% 1.16% 63

11AOperating expense per investment recovery employee including outsourcing expenses

$110,427 $122,242 $41,071 $423,240 $101,500 54

11BOperating expense per investment recovery employee excluding outsourcing expenses

n.r. $105,218 $30,689 $250,000 $93,567 54

12 Company IR employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 82.29% 78.58% 17.88% 100.00% 84.25% 54

In-house IR contractors/consultants operating expense as a percent of total operating expense

10.00% 4.07% 0.00% 57.97% 0.00% 54

Temporary employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 15.30% 2.29% 0.00% 53.57% 0.00% 54

Direct cost of outsourced IR services as a percent of total operating expense 17.30% 8.61% 0.00% 81.76% 0.00% 54

Other costs as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 6.46% 0.00% 38.69% 2.98% 54

13 Operating expense per transaction $1,244 $1,865 $41 $15,909 $652 46

14Average company sales for 2006 for the portion of the company for which IR services are provided

$11,692,622,705 $16,069,344,510 $300,000 $91,833,000,000 $9,511,000,000 52

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

5

Page 6: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

Investment Recovery Processes and Best Practices

15 Percent of companies that outsource some IR activities or services 72.22% 84.29% 70

Percent of companies that chose the following as one of the top five activities/ services outsourced in 2006

60

Appraisals 38.46% 43.33%

Auction 79.49% 63.33%

Bid or Negotiated Sales 41.03% 45.00%

Dismantling/Demolition 46.15% 53.33%

eAuction Sales 46.15% 41.67%

Equipment refurbishment 25.64% 13.33%

Internal Surplus redeployment 7.69% 13.33%

Internal staff augmentation 5.13% 13.33%

Offsite surplus storage/management 15.38% 20.00%

Recycling 51.28% 46.67%

Surplus identification/characterization 17.95% 20.00%

Used equipment searches 7.69% 21.67%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

16 Average number of transactions per IR employee 330 230 3 1,160 102 52

17 Internal transfers/redeployments as a percent of total transactions 49.09% 27.48% 0.00% 96.15% 13.10% 55

Third-party sales transactions as a percent of total transactions 60.17% 72.52% 3.85% 100.00% 86.90% 55

18Percent of companies that require the use of Investment Recovery to dispose of surplus assets

75.93% 61.43% 69

Percent of companies that encourage the use of Investment Recovery for disposal of surplus assets

n.r. 22.86%

Percent of companies that have no policy regarding the use of Investment Recovery n.r. 15.71%

19 Percent of companies active in trying to prevent the generation of surplus assets 43.40% 37.68% 69

Methods used:

20On a scale of 1 - 5, average rating of the following statements (1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree):

69

Senior executives understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.41 3.25

Operations managers understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.56 3.23

21 Percent of company's identified surplus assets managed 79.14% 79.05% 10.00% 100.00% 90.00% 68

22

Average number of days surplus assets are typically held or considered for redeployment before being marketed for external sale

108 40 7 365 60 62

When supported by policy, average number of days assets are held prior to being marketed for external sale

n.r. 100 14 365 75 24

All projects to look at surplus prior to starting procurement; Created IR clause to be included in purchasing contract to address total life cycle management of commodity; Early involvement with Project/Capital purchases; Leasing some capital assets; Moving equipment around to other internal projects; New software program being initiated to monitor and reduce redundancy; On-site vendor alliance contracts; On time delivery; Promoting buy back clauses; Provide trade-in clauses in purchase of new equipment; Return clauses in purchase contracts; Workshops with other organizations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

6

Page 7: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Release Date: June 1, 2007

Previous Report In Place In Place In Progress Still an

Opportunity# Companies

Reporting

23Percent of companies that reported implementation of the following Investment Recovery Association best practices:

Strong Visible Management Support 40.74% 44.93% 28.99% 26.09% 69

Surplus Asset Management Processes (identification, valuation, data base visibility, ssurplus matched with demand, etc.)

43.40% 39.39% 31.82% 28.79% 66

Regular Reporting of Metrics and Successes 66.67% 62.32% 21.74% 15.94% 69

Financial Incentives for Surplus Disposition 28.30% 23.88% 10.45% 65.67% 67

Surplus and Refurbished Assets Considered before Buying New 35.85% 29.85% 29.85% 40.30% 67

Early Involvement with Other Corporate Activities (capital projects, real estate sales, upgrades, demolition, divestitures, plant shut-downs, etc.)

22.64% 23.53% 55.88% 20.59% 68

Supplier Integration and Support (IR service provider contracts in place, equipment refurbishment programs, integrated processes, etc.)

31.48% 32.35% 26.47% 41.18% 68

Internet/intranet Utilization for Sales/Redeployment 48.15% 42.65% 29.41% 27.94% 68

Surplus Prevention and Return-to-Supplier processes 24.07% 27.54% 36.23% 36.23% 69

External Networking 38.89% 50.72% 34.78% 14.49% 69

Value Chain (Decision Hierarchy) Approach to Surplus Asset Disposition 43.40% 51.47% 19.12% 27.94% 68

24 Other IR processes considered by companies as good/best practices

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Electronic Commerce

25Percent of total sales/redeployment that resulted from the use of the Internet/intranet

External sales via Internet Posting (excluding eAuctions) 26.29% 32.88% 0.50% 90.00% 17.50% 36

External sales via eAuctions 16.06% 19.70% 0.50% 100.00% 7.50% 32

External sales via 3rd-party sellers or brokers (excluding eAuctions) 30.46% 39.96% 1.00% 100.00% 34.00% 46

Redeployment via intranet - percent of total transfers 40.38% 28.00% 1.00% 100.00% 10.00% 42

26Percent of companies with IR function responsible for locating and purchasing used machinery and equipment

n.r. 21.74% 69

Accountability and targets in place in personal performance contracts; Active with groups within our company to get the word out of the advantages of Investment Recovery; Activities integrated with Corporate Community Relations/donations and Environmental Services; Awareness sessions company wide; Computer reconditioning and donation practices to extend useful life, reduce waste and build relations with stakeholders; Developing a reclamation plan for base metal catalyst as opposed to land fill; Internal Computer Lab - Data security cleansing to insure private and confidential information is protected; Establishing a national electronic Asset Management System for reporting all asset action; Process in place to "loan" refrigeration equipment out to our stores for short term use during construction projects; Purchase of surplus assets as an option to purchasing new items; Recycling efforts for day-to-day items and also for new construction; Recycling of excess/obsolete computers through Goodwill Industries; Sharing of ideas; Storeroom inventory reclamation and recovery; The use of excess assets to alleviate offset obligation

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

7

Page 8: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

27Percent of companies that use the following types of information systems for internal redeployment and surplus sales:

70

Combined company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, web-based 12.96% 20.00%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales systems, both web-based

16.67% 10.00%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, only surplus sales system web-based

11.11% 5.71%

One internal deployment system, plus multiple surplus sales systems, some web-based

12.96% 18.57%

No web-based information systems - use posted spreadsheets, lists, faxes and/or email only

27.78% 27.14%

Other 18.52% 18.57%

List:

28Percent of companies that use the following web-based technologies to promote surplus sales:

65

Maintain own company surplus sales website 42.59% 44.62%

Actively submit company surplus sales website(s) to search engines for indexing 11.11% 7.69%

Maintain and use database or email list of prospective buyers 57.41% 78.46%

Rely solely on outside contract sales and auction firms 24.07% 16.92%

Rely on third-party websites for marketing of surplus 33.33% 30.77%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Investment Recovery Staffing

29 Investment recovery employees as a percent of total company employees 0.09% 0.10% 0.00% 1.14% 0.04% 67

Exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees 68.16% 66.08% 0.00% 100.00% 75.00% 57

Non-exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees

50.61% 25.10% 0.00% 100.00% 20.00% 57

In-house contractors as a percent of total IR employees 25.07% 8.81% 0.00% 89.29% 0.00% 57

30 Percent of FTE IR employees that have:

Bachelor's degree 55.03% 36.13% 0.00% 100.00% 30.00% 69

Master's degree 50.80% 12.41% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 67

Professional certification 49.84% 18.05% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 70

Less than 5 years of IR experience 57.28% 31.85% 0.00% 100.00% 25.00% 69

Between 5 and 15 years of IR experience 51.83% 35.75% 0.00% 100.00% 25.00% 68

More than 15 years of IR experience 61.45% 22.72% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 70

Broker Web based site; email and web based; engineering network conducts most activity; web company-wide redeployment system. Most surplus sales handled by the BU.

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

8

Page 9: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

31 Investment Recovery Salaries

Level I (Top Position) - Function Head, Investment Recovery

Title

55

Reports to (Title)

55

Salary Range

Minimum $66,844 $77,406 $33,000 $125,000 $75,000 47

Maximum $97,576 $107,695 $44,000 $190,000 $108,250 50

Average salary $81,574 $91,437 $44,000 $155,000 $90,000 43

Number of employees supervised

Direct 7 5 1 20 4 39

Indirect 9 20 1 150 4 32

Level II - Sr. Investment Recovery Representative

Title

45

Salary Range

Minimum $56,383 $59,121 $34,028 $95,000 $59,563 36

Maximum $80,149 $82,235 $40,000 $125,000 $80,000 37

Number of employees in position 2 4 1 90 1 38

Average salary $68,596 $72,690 $40,996 $115,000 $72,216 31

Asset Recovery Agent; Assistant Chief Operations Officer; Capital & Investment Recovery Manager; Capital Sales Co-Ordinator; Director; Director of Investment Recovery Operations; Inventory Manager; Investment Recovery Administrator; Investment Recovery Analyst; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Leader; Investment Recovery Manager; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Leader; Logistics Manager; Manager; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manater - Materials Resource Recovery; Manager - Supply Operations Support; Manager, Investment Recovery; Manager Investment Recovery & Reversed Logistics; Manager Supply Operations Support; Manager, Generation Inventory Management; Manager, National Supply Management Programs; Manager, Supply Chain; Market Supply Manager; Materials Management Team Lead; Materials Manager; Procurement Manager - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist - Investment Recovery; Senior Buyer; Senior Manager - Procurement/Investment Recovery; Senior Purchases Manager; Sourcing Manager; Supervisor Investment Recovery; Supply Chain Representative

Chief Operations Officer; Customer Team Manager; Director; Director-Global Purchasing Machinery & Equipment; Director-Technical Procurement; Director Land Water & Asset Recovery; Director Material Distribution & Recovery Services; Director of Business Integration; Director of Procurement; Director of Procurement and Administration; Director of Purchasing Operations; Director of Supply Management; Director, Generation Supply Chain; Executive Director; Group Manager; Manager; Manager Corporate Transportation/Investment Recovery; Manager of Logistics; Manager of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management; Manager Supply Chain; Manager, Procurement Operations; Manager, Sourcing and Contracts; Managing Director; Managing Supervisor Materials Management; Materials Management Operations Manager; Procurement Manager; Purchase Contract Manager; Purchasing Leader; Purchasing Manager; Regional Category Manager; Section Leader Central Stores; Sr. Manager Materials Management; Supply Chain Director; Supply Chain Management

Asset Recovery Coordinator; Coordinator/Buyer, Asset Management; Corporate Investment Recovery Technologist; Disposal Sales Representative; INV Materials Handler II; Inventory Services Sales Agent; Inventory Specialist; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Team Leader; IR Analyst; IR Site Contact; Lead Investment Recovery Specialist; Manager - Investment Recovery; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manager Resource Recovery; Material Specialist; Materials Management Tech & Sr Field Materials Coordinator; Procurement Agent - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist III; Purchases Manager; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Regional Manager; Sales Manager Investment Recovery; Sales Specialist; Section Manager; Senior Engineering Tech; Senior Investment Recovery Specialist; Senior Logistics Planning Analyst; Specialist; Sr. Investment Recovery Supervisor; Sr. Materials Analyst; Sr/Advanced Supply Chain Analyst; Stores Supersvisor; Supervisor; Surplus Asset Sales & Service; Team Leader - Asset Recovery

Manager; Team Lead - Operations Purchasing; Vice President; VP - Environmental Health and Safety; VP of Supply Operations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

9

Page 10: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportData Year: 2006

Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Level III - Investment Recovery Representative

Title

26

Salary Range

Minimum $41,487 $46,845 $25,000 $75,000 $46,000 23

Maximum $62,781 $69,314 $31,553 $108,000 $63,780 24

Number of employees in position 4 3 0 13 1 24

Average salary $50,952 $57,364 $29,910 $86,000 $60,000 21

Level IV - Associate Investment Recovery Representative (Clerical, Support Staff)

Title

24

Salary Range

Minimum $32,910 $36,358 $25,000 $60,988 $36,900 22

Maximum $45,143 $52,577 $26,500 $88,437 $51,000 23

Number of employees in position 7 6 0 85 2 25

Average salary $39,192 $44,738 $26,500 $67,000 $43,418 24

Paid by Employer Paid by Employee Joint

Contribution # companies

32 Company benefits:

Professional Support:

Professional License Fees 85.45% 9.09% 5.45% 55

Professional Society Dues 89.06% 7.81% 3.13% 64

Professional Publications 85.48% 8.06% 4.84% 62

Continuing Education 71.64% 2.99% 25.37% 67

Administration; Adminstration Specialist; Administrative Assistant; Administrative Support, Senior; Asset Recovery Coordinator II; Assistant Asset Recovery Agent; Associate Investment Recovery Specialist; Clerk; District Material Management Specialist; Investment Recovery Advisor; Invoicing Clerk; IR Representative; IR Systems Administrator; Marketing Coordinator; Material Handler; Material Management Support Specialist; Materials Assistant; Operations Specialist; Purchasing Assistant; Purchasing Rep; Senior Support; Specialist; Warehouse Specialist & Group Leader, Office Administration

Asset Recovery Agent; Asset Recovery Coordinator I; Associate Supply Chain Analyst; Asst. Manager - Investment Recovery; Business Support - Investment Recovery Specialist; Facilitator; INV Materials Handler I; Inventory Analyst; Inventory Services Senior Specialist; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Logistics Planning Analyst; Material Management Supervisor; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Resource Recovery Specialist; Storekeeper; Supervisor; Technical Clerk; Warehouse Supervisor

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

10

Page 11: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection I: Chemical, Oil Gas Companies

Data Year: 2006Date Released: June 1, 2007

Aera Energy LLC Lyondell Chemical CompanyBASF Corporation NOVA Chemicals CorporationBP West Coast Products LLC Shell Canada LimitedConocoPhillips Suncor Energy Inc.DCP, Midstream, LP The Dow Chemical CompanyEastman Chemical Company TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.Husky Oil Operations Limited Valero Energy CorporationJ.R. Simplot Company

A.

Total 245,800,800,000$ Average 20,483,400,000$ Median 11,925,000,000$ Range 1,209,000,000$ to $91,833,000,000

The following companies provided data for this study:

Sales (in dollars):

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

11

Page 12: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection I: Chemical, Oil Gas Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Financial Information

1 Total cost benefit $19,991,008 $450,000 $73,100,000 $6,200,000 13

2 Total cost benefit as a percent of total company sales 0.12% 0.01% 0.46% 0.06% 13

3 Total cost benefit as a percent of sales attributed to business segments served 0.17% 0.01% 0.46% 0.11% 11

4 Total cost benefit dollars to operating expense dollars 41 11 209 18 11

5 Total cost benefit dollars per transaction $33,498 $11,509 $81,250 $31,627 12

6 Total cost benefit provided by each investment recovery employee $2,243,808 $600,000 $6,273,445 $2,043,808 12

7 Total cost benefit provided by each exempt investment recovery employee $5,887,187 $775,000 $31,367,226 $2,873,473 10

8 Investment recovery gross third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 22.04% 0.33% 90.32% 8.88% 9

9 Net third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 20.77% 0.28% 86.29% 7.51% 9

10 Gross sales dollars as a percent of total cost benefit 63.20% 2.87% 100.00% 60.89% 13

Internal transfers/redeployment activity as a percent of total cost benefit 30.97% 0.00% 95.76% 38.13% 13

Other cost avoidance as a percent of total cost benefit 5.82% 0.00% 19.05% 1.37% 13

11AOperating expense per investment recovery employee including outsourcing expenses

$130,900 $44,517 $350,000 $124,642 12

11BOperating expense per investment recovery employee excluding outsourcing expenses

$101,430 $30,689 $175,000 $93,684 12

12 Company IR employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 72.90% 42.86% 100.00% 73.79% 12

In-house IR contractors/consultants operating expense as a percent of total operating expense

1.16% 0.00% 6.38% 0.00% 12

Temporary employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 12

Direct cost of outsourced IR services as a percent of total operating expense 17.56% 0.00% 57.14% 11.70% 12

Other costs as a percent of total operating expense 8.39% 0.00% 28.17% 5.94% 12

13 Operating expense per transaction $1,810 $67 $4,522 $2,122 11

14Average company sales for 2006 for the portion of the company for which IR services are provided

$18,868,700,000 $1,209,000,000 $91,833,000,000 $10,000,000,000 11

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

12

Page 13: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection I: Chemical, Oil Gas Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

Investment Recovery Processes and Best Practices

15 Percent of companies that outsource some IR activities or services 73.33% 15

Percent of companies that chose the following as one of the top five activities/ services outsourced in 2006

12

Appraisals 58.33%

Auction 41.67%

Bid or Negotiated Sales 33.33%

Dismantling/Demolition 58.33%

eAuction Sales 33.33%

Equipment refurbishment 16.67%

Internal Surplus redeployment 16.67%

Internal staff augmentation 16.67%

Offsite surplus storage/management 41.67%

Recycling 33.33%

Surplus identification/characterization 50.00%

Used equipment searches 33.33%

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

16 Average number of transactions per IR employee 76 31 199 63 11

17 Internal transfers/redeployments as a percent of total transactions 32.97% 1.32% 96.15% 28.93% 12

Third-party sales transactions as a percent of total transactions 67.03% 3.85% 98.68% 71.07% 12

18Percent of companies that require the use of Investment Recovery to dispose of surplus assets

46.67% 15

Percent of companies that encourage the use of Investment Recovery for disposal of surplus assets

20.00%

Percent of companies that have no policy regarding the use of Investment Recovery 33.33%

19 Percent of companies active in trying to prevent the generation of surplus assets 53.33% 15

Methods used:

20On a scale of 1 - 5, average rating of the following statements (1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree):

15

Senior executives understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.13

Operations managers understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.07

21 Percent of company's identified surplus assets managed 78.33% 40.00% 100.00% 90.00% 15

22

Average number of days surplus assets are typically held or considered for redeployment before being marketed for external sale

40 30 365 120 15

When supported by policy, average number of days assets are held prior to being marketed for external sale

174 4

All projects to look at surplus prior to starting procurement; Created IR clause to be included in purchasing contract to address total life cycle management of commodity; Early involvement with Project/Capital purchases; Leasing some capital assets; Moving equipment around to other internal projects; New software program being initiated to monitor and reduce redundancy; On-site vendor alliance contracts; On time delivery; Promoting buy back clauses; Provide trade-in clauses in purchase of new equipment; Return clauses in purchase contracts; Workshops with other organizations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

13

Page 14: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection I: Chemical, Oil Gas Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

No Previous Report In

PlaceIn Place In Progress Still an

Opportunity# Companies

Reporting

23Percent of companies that reported implementation of the following Investment Recovery Association best practices:

Strong Visible Management Support 64.29% 14.29% 21.43% 14

Surplus Asset Management Processes (identification, valuation, data base visibility, ssurplus matched with demand, etc.)

35.71% 35.71% 28.57% 14

Regular Reporting of Metrics and Successes 60.00% 20.00% 20.00% 15

Financial Incentives for Surplus Disposition 35.71% 21.43% 42.86% 14

Surplus and Refurbished Assets Considered before Buying New 35.71% 42.86% 21.43% 14

Early Involvement with Other Corporate Activities (capital projects, real estate sales, upgrades, demolition, divestitures, plant shut-downs, etc.)

40.00% 46.67% 13.33% 15

Supplier Integration and Support (IR service provider contracts in place, equipment refurbishment programs, integrated processes, etc.)

53.33% 20.00% 26.67% 15

Internet/intranet Utilization for Sales/Redeployment 57.14% 21.43% 21.43% 14

Surplus Prevention and Return-to-Supplier processes 46.67% 26.67% 26.67% 15

External Networking 66.67% 26.67% 6.67% 15

Value Chain (Decision Hierarchy) Approach to Surplus Asset Disposition 53.33% 6.67% 40.00% 15

24 Other IR processes considered by companies as good/best practices

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Electronic Commerce

25Percent of total sales/redeployment that resulted from the use of the Internet/intranet

External sales via Internet Posting (excluding eAuctions) 41.17% 5.00% 90.00% 37.50% 6

External sales via eAuctions 22.83% 2.00% 40.00% 22.50% 6

External sales via 3rd-party sellers or brokers (excluding eAuctions) 40.08% 1.00% 100.00% 30.00% 12

Redeployment via intranet - percent of total transfers 26.09% 10.00% 75.00% 10.00% 11

26Percent of companies with IR function responsible for locating and purchasing used machinery and equipment

46.67% 15

Accountability and targets in place in personal performance contracts; Active with groups within our company to get the word out of the advantages of Investment Recovery; Activities integrated with Corporate Community Relations/donations and Environmental Services; Awareness sessions company wide; Computer reconditioning and donation practices to extend useful life, reduce waste and build relations with stakeholders; Developing a reclamation plan for base metal catalyst as opposed to land fill; Internal Computer Lab - Data security cleansing to insure private and confidential information is protected; Establishing a national electronic Asset Management System for reporting all asset action; Process in place to "loan" refrigeration equipment out to our stores for short term use during construction projects; Purchase of surplus assets as an option to purchasing new items; Recycling efforts for day-to-day items and also for new construction; Recycling of excess/obsolete computers through Goodwill Industries; Sharing of ideas; Storeroom inventory reclamation and recovery; The use of excess assets to alleviate offset obligation

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

14

Page 15: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection I: Chemical, Oil Gas Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

27Percent of companies that use the following types of information systems for internal redeployment and surplus sales:

15

Combined company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, web-based 26.67%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales systems, both web-based

13.33%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, only surplus sales system web-based

0.00%

One internal deployment system, plus multiple surplus sales systems, some web-based

20.00%

No web-based information systems - use posted spreadsheets, lists, faxes and/or email only

20.00%

Other 20.00%

List:

28Percent of companies that use the following web-based technologies to promote surplus sales:

15

Maintain own company surplus sales website 40.00%

Actively submit company surplus sales website(s) to search engines for indexing 0.00%

Maintain and use database or email list of prospective buyers 80.00%

Rely solely on outside contract sales and auction firms 6.67%

Rely on third-party websites for marketing of surplus 26.67%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Investment Recovery Staffing

29 Investment recovery employees as a percent of total company employees 0.16% 0.01% 1.14% 0.08% 14

Exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees 64.60% 0.00% 100.00% 63.16% 13

Non-exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees

23.31% 0.00% 80.00% 20.00% 13

In-house contractors as a percent of total IR employees 12.09% 0.00% 80.00% 0.00% 13

30 Percent of FTE IR employees that have:

Bachelor's degree 25.00% 0.00% 100.00% 2.00% 15

Master's degree 10.13% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 15

Professional certification 19.73% 0.00% 100.00% 17.00% 15

Less than 5 years of IR experience 27.67% 0.00% 100.00% 10.00% 15

Between 5 and 15 years of IR experience 27.00% 0.00% 90.00% 5.00% 15

More than 15 years of IR experience 27.67% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 15

Broker Web based site; email and web based; engineering network conducts most activity; web company-wide redeployment system. Most surplus sales handled by the BU.

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

15

Page 16: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection I: Chemical, Oil Gas Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

31 Investment Recovery Salaries

Level I (Top Position) - Function Head, Investment Recovery

Title

12

Reports to (Title)

12

Salary Range

Minimum $79,700 $57,000 $100,000 $82,500 10

Maximum $104,273 $44,000 $150,000 $110,000 11

Average salary $92,521 $44,000 $125,000 $91,250 8

Number of employees supervised

Direct 3 1 9 3 7

Indirect 26 2 120 10 7

Level II - Sr. Investment Recovery Representative

Title

9

Salary Range

Minimum $53,188 $40,000 $75,000 $45,250 8

Maximum $74,400 $50,000 $100,000 $72,600 8

Number of employees in position 13 1 90 2 8

Average salary $68,000 4

Asset Recovery Agent; Assistant Chief Operations Officer; Capital & Investment Recovery Manager; Capital Sales Co-Ordinator; Director; Director of Investment Recovery Operations; Inventory Manager; Investment Recovery Administrator; Investment Recovery Analyst; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Leader; Investment Recovery Manager; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Leader; Logistics Manager; Manager; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manater - Materials Resource Recovery; Manager - Supply Operations Support; Manager, Investment Recovery; Manager Investment Recovery & Reversed Logistics; Manager Supply Operations Support; Manager, Generation Inventory Management; Manager, National Supply Management Programs; Manager, Supply Chain; Market Supply Manager; Materials Management Team Lead; Materials Manager; Procurement Manager - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist - Investment Recovery; Senior Buyer; Senior Manager - Procurement/Investment Recovery; Senior Purchases Manager; Sourcing Manager; Supervisor Investment Recovery; Supply Chain Representative

Chief Operations Officer; Customer Team Manager; Director; Director-Global Purchasing Machinery & Equipment; Director-Technical Procurement; Director Land Water & Asset Recovery; Director Material Distribution & Recovery Services; Director of Business Integration; Director of Procurement; Director of Procurement and Administration; Director of Purchasing Operations; Director of Supply Management; Director, Generation Supply Chain; Executive Director; Group Manager; Manager; Manager Corporate Transportation/Investment Recovery; Manager of Logistics; Manager of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management; Manager Supply Chain; Manager, Procurement Operations; Manager, Sourcing and Contracts; Managing Director; Managing Supervisor Materials Management; Materials Management Operations Manager; Procurement Manager; Purchase Contract Manager; Purchasing Leader; Purchasing Manager; Regional Category Manager; Section Leader Central Stores; Sr. Manager Materials Management; Supply Chain Director; Supply Chain Management

Asset Recovery Coordinator; Coordinator/Buyer, Asset Management; Corporate Investment Recovery Technologist; Disposal Sales Representative; INV Materials Handler II; Inventory Services Sales Agent; Inventory Specialist; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Team Leader; IR Analyst; IR Site Contact; Lead Investment Recovery Specialist; Manager - Investment Recovery; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manager Resource Recovery; Material Specialist; Materials Management Tech & Sr Field Materials Coordinator; Procurement Agent -Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist III; Purchases Manager; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Regional Manager; Sales Manager Investment Recovery; Sales Specialist; Section Manager; Senior Engineering Tech; Senior Investment Recovery Specialist; Senior Logistics Planning Analyst; Specialist; Sr. Investment Recovery Supervisor; Sr. Materials Analyst; Sr/Advanced Supply Chain Analyst; Stores Supersvisor; Supervisor; Surplus Asset Sales & Service; Team Leader - Asset Recovery

Manager; Team Lead - Operations Purchasing; Vice President; VP - Environmental Health and Safety; VP of Supply Operations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

16

Page 17: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection I: Chemical, Oil Gas Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Level III - Investment Recovery Representative

Title

2

Salary Range

Minimum i.d. 1

Maximum i.d. 1

Number of employees in position i.d. 1

Average salary i.d. 0

Level IV - Associate Investment Recovery Representative (Clerical, Support Staff)

Title

2

Salary Range

Minimum i.d. 2

Maximum i.d. 2

Number of employees in position i.d. 2

Average salary i.d. 2

Paid by Employer Paid by Employee Joint

Contribution # companies

32 Company benefits:

Professional Support:

Professional License Fees 90.00% 10.00% 0.00% 10

Professional Society Dues 92.31% 7.69% 0.00% 13

Professional Publications 84.62% 7.69% 7.69% 13

Continuing Education 71.43% 7.14% 21.43% 14

Administration; Adminstration Specialist; Administrative Assistant; Administrative Support, Senior; Asset Recovery Coordinator II; Assistant Asset Recovery Agent; Associate Investment Recovery Specialist; Clerk; District Material Management Specialist; Investment Recovery Advisor; Invoicing Clerk; IR Representative; IR Systems Administrator; Marketing Coordinator; Material Handler; Material Management Support Specialist; Materials Assistant; Operations Specialist; Purchasing Assistant; Purchasing Rep; Senior Support; Specialist; Warehouse Specialist & Group Leader, Office Administration

Asset Recovery Agent; Asset Recovery Coordinator I; Associate Supply Chain Analyst; Asst. Manager - Investment Recovery; Business Support - Investment Recovery Specialist; Facilitator; INV Materials Handler I; Inventory Analyst; Inventory Services Senior Specialist; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Logistics Planning Analyst; Material Management Supervisor; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Resource Recovery Specialist; Storekeeper; Supervisor; Technical Clerk; Warehouse Supervisor

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

17

Page 18: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection II: Consumer Products, Foods, Pharmaceuticals

Data Year: 2006Date Released: June 1, 2007

Abbott Laboratories Hospira IncCampbell Soup Company Pfizer Inc.Eastman Kodak Company The Procter & Gamble CompanyEli Lilly and Company

A.

Total 165,534,000,000$ Average 27,589,000,000$ Median 20,345,500,000$ Range 2,500,000,000$ to $70,000,000,000

The following companies provided data for this study:

Sales (in dollars):

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

18

Page 19: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection II: Consumer Products, Foods, Pharmaceuticals

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Financial Information

1 Total cost benefit $4,865,738 $13,756,332 $937,991 $42,000,000 $5,650,000 6

2 Total cost benefit as a percent of total company sales 0.19% 0.04% 0.01% 0.06% 0.03% 5

3 Total cost benefit as a percent of sales attributed to business segments served 1.71% 0.04% 4

4 Total cost benefit dollars to operating expense dollars 16 30 4 66 26 6

5 Total cost benefit dollars per transaction $17,787 $27,252 $1,706 $105,000 $9,593 6

6 Total cost benefit provided by each investment recovery employee $1,740,000 $3,223,924 $555,556 $8,400,000 $2,375,000 6

7 Total cost benefit provided by each exempt investment recovery employee $5,859,235 $7,631,332 $937,991 $21,000,000 $5,550,000 6

8 Investment recovery gross third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 44.32% 28.38% 2.98% 71.94% 24.52% 6

9 Net third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 35.82% 21.23% 2.00% 61.15% 14.14% 6

10 Gross sales dollars as a percent of total cost benefit n.r. 48.61% 4.76% 100.00% 46.23% 6

Internal transfers/redeployment activity as a percent of total cost benefit 42.78% 36.22% 0.00% 83.33% 32.34% 6

Other cost avoidance as a percent of total cost benefit 14.51% 15.16% 0.00% 63.83% 7.10% 6

11AOperating expense per investment recovery employee including outsourcing expenses

$121,406 $125,515 $90,000 $242,400 $99,678 6

11BOperating expense per investment recovery employee excluding outsourcing expenses

n.r. $125,515 $90,000 $242,400 $99,678 6

12 Company IR employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 74.51% 77.82% 55.22% 100.00% 74.78% 6

In-house IR contractors/consultants operating expense as a percent of total operating expense

n.r. 9.67% 0.00% 21.43% 8.53% 6

Temporary employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 2.84% 0.00% 17.06% 0.00% 6

Direct cost of outsourced IR services as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 6

Other costs as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 9.66% 0.00% 36.84% 4.74% 6

13 Operating expense per transaction $1,400 $1,106 $160 $3,000 $497 6

14Average company sales for 2006 for the portion of the company for which IR services are provided

$12,004,477,000 $21,668,660,000 $300,000 $70,000,000,000 $7,343,000,000 5

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

19

Page 20: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection II: Consumer Products, Foods, Pharmaceuticals

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

Investment Recovery Processes and Best Practices

15 Percent of companies that outsource some IR activities or services 88.89% 100.00% 7

Percent of companies that chose the following as one of the top five activities/ services outsourced in 2006

7

Appraisals 50.00% 57.14%

Auction 62.50% 57.14%

Bid or Negotiated Sales 75.00% 100.00%

Dismantling/Demolition 25.00% 28.57%

eAuction Sales 62.50% 85.71%

Equipment refurbishment 0.00% 0.00%

Internal Surplus redeployment 25.00% 28.57%

Internal staff augmentation 0.00% 14.29%

Offsite surplus storage/management 12.50% 42.86%

Recycling 50.00% 14.29%

Surplus identification/characterization 25.00% 42.86%

Used equipment searches 0.00% 0.00%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

16 Average number of transactions per IR employee 103 300 30 800 233 6

17 Internal transfers/redeployments as a percent of total transactions 56.37% 37.71% 0.00% 75.89% 35.77% 6

Third-party sales transactions as a percent of total transactions 49.08% 62.29% 24.11% 100.00% 64.23% 6

18Percent of companies that require the use of Investment Recovery to dispose of surplus assets

77.78% 57.14% 7

Percent of companies that encourage the use of Investment Recovery for disposal of surplus assets

n.r. 28.57%

Percent of companies that have no policy regarding the use of Investment Recovery n.r. 14.29%

19 Percent of companies active in trying to prevent the generation of surplus assets 0.00% 14.29% 7

Methods used:

20On a scale of 1 - 5, average rating of the following statements (1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree):

7

Senior executives understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.22 3.43

Operations managers understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.44 3.00

21 Percent of company's identified surplus assets managed 45.38% 62.14% 20.00% 100.00% 50.00% 7

22

Average number of days surplus assets are typically held or considered for redeployment before being marketed for external sale

96 39 60 365 90 5

When supported by policy, average number of days assets are held prior to being marketed for external sale

n.r. 139 60 365 90 5

All projects to look at surplus prior to starting procurement; Created IR clause to be included in purchasing contract to address total life cycle management of commodity; Early involvement with Project/Capital purchases; Leasing some capital assets; Moving equipment around to other internal projects; New software program being initiated to monitor and reduce redundancy; On-site vendor alliance contracts; On time delivery; Promoting buy back clauses; Provide trade-in clauses in purchase of new equipment; Return clauses in purchase contracts; Workshops with other organizations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

20

Page 21: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection II: Consumer Products, Foods, Pharmaceuticals

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

Previous Report In Place In Place In Progress Still an

Opportunity# Companies

Reporting

23Percent of companies that reported implementation of the following Investment Recovery Association best practices:

Strong Visible Management Support 33.33% 28.57% 28.57% 42.86% 7

Surplus Asset Management Processes (identification, valuation, data base visibility, ssurplus matched with demand, etc.)

44.44% 42.86% 42.86% 14.29% 7

Regular Reporting of Metrics and Successes 66.67% 71.43% 0.00% 28.57% 7

Financial Incentives for Surplus Disposition 11.11% 28.57% 14.29% 57.14% 7

Surplus and Refurbished Assets Considered before Buying New 11.11% 42.86% 28.57% 28.57% 7

Early Involvement with Other Corporate Activities (capital projects, real estate sales, upgrades, demolition, divestitures, plant shut-downs, etc.)

22.22% 42.86% 28.57% 28.57% 7

Supplier Integration and Support (IR service provider contracts in place, equipment refurbishment programs, integrated processes, etc.)

11.11% 42.86% 14.29% 42.86% 7

Internet/intranet Utilization for Sales/Redeployment 66.67% 57.14% 42.86% 0.00% 7

Surplus Prevention and Return-to-Supplier processes 0.00% 14.29% 14.29% 71.43% 7

External Networking 11.11% 28.57% 57.14% 14.29% 7

Value Chain (Decision Hierarchy) Approach to Surplus Asset Disposition 22.22% 14.29% 42.86% 42.86% 7

24 Other IR processes considered by companies as good/best practices

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Electronic Commerce

25Percent of total sales/redeployment that resulted from the use of the Internet/intranet

External sales via Internet Posting (excluding eAuctions) 35.00% 33.75% 4

External sales via eAuctions n.r. 10.80% 2.00% 25.00% 5.00% 5

External sales via 3rd-party sellers or brokers (excluding eAuctions) 46.25% 38.57% 5.00% 90.00% 45.00% 7

Redeployment via intranet - percent of total transfers 50.00% 43.00% 3.00% 70.00% 55.00% 6

26Percent of companies with IR function responsible for locating and purchasing used machinery and equipment

n.r. 28.57% 7

Accountability and targets in place in personal performance contracts; Active with groups within our company to get the word out of the advantages of Investment Recovery; Activities integrated with Corporate Community Relations/donations and Environmental Services; Awareness sessions company wide; Computer reconditioning and donation practices to extend useful life, reduce waste and build relations with stakeholders; Developing a reclamation plan for base metal catalyst as opposed to land fill; Internal Computer Lab - Data security cleansing to insure private and confidential information is protected; Establishing a national electronic Asset Management System for reporting all asset action; Process in place to "loan" refrigeration equipment out to our stores for short term use during construction projects; Purchase of surplus assets as an option to purchasing new items; Recycling efforts for day-to-day items and also for new construction; Recycling of excess/obsolete computers through Goodwill Industries; Sharing of ideas; Storeroom inventory reclamation and recovery; The use of excess assets to alleviate offset obligation

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

21

Page 22: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection II: Consumer Products, Foods, Pharmaceuticals

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

27Percent of companies that use the following types of information systems for internal redeployment and surplus sales:

7

Combined company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, web-based 11.11% 28.57%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales systems, both web-based

44.44% 0.00%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, only surplus sales system web-based

11.11% 14.29%

One internal deployment system, plus multiple surplus sales systems, some web-based

0.00% 14.29%

No web-based information systems - use posted spreadsheets, lists, faxes and/or email only

11.11% 0.00%

Other 22.22% 42.86%

List:

28Percent of companies that use the following web-based technologies to promote surplus sales:

7

Maintain own company surplus sales website 55.56% 57.14%

Actively submit company surplus sales website(s) to search engines for indexing 11.11% 14.29%

Maintain and use database or email list of prospective buyers 22.22% 42.86%

Rely solely on outside contract sales and auction firms 11.11% 14.29%

Rely on third-party websites for marketing of surplus 22.22% 42.86%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Investment Recovery Staffing

29 Investment recovery employees as a percent of total company employees 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% 0.02% 0.01% 7

Exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees 47.62% 59.84% 33.33% 100.00% 50.00% 7

Non-exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees

45.24% 26.83% 0.00% 50.00% 33.33% 7

In-house contractors as a percent of total IR employees n.r. 13.33% 0.00% 40.00% 0.00% 7

30 Percent of FTE IR employees that have:

Bachelor's degree 68.75% 21.71% 0.00% 75.00% 11.00% 7

Master's degree n.r. 3.67% 0.00% 22.00% 0.00% 6

Professional certification n.r. 11.00% 0.00% 66.00% 0.00% 7

Less than 5 years of IR experience 76.33% 42.14% 0.00% 100.00% 44.00% 7

Between 5 and 15 years of IR experience n.r. 30.83% 0.00% 67.00% 26.00% 6

More than 15 years of IR experience n.r. 19.14% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 7

Broker Web based site; email and web based; engineering network conducts most activity; web company-wide redeployment system. Most surplus sales handled by the BU.

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

22

Page 23: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection II: Consumer Products, Foods, Pharmaceuticals

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

31 Investment Recovery Salaries

Level I (Top Position) - Function Head, Investment Recovery

Title

6

Reports to (Title)

6

Salary Range

Minimum $57,400 $87,833 $65,000 $125,000 $85,000 6

Maximum $98,888 $125,667 $65,000 $190,000 $127,500 6

Average salary $72,438 $107,167 $83,000 $155,000 $102,500 6

Number of employees supervised

Direct 4 3 4

Indirect 2 2 1 4 1 5

Level II - Sr. Investment Recovery Representative

Title

5

Salary Range

Minimum n.r. $58,720 $47,000 $76,600 $60,000 5

Maximum n.r. $82,800 $40,000 $125,000 $80,000 5

Number of employees in position n.r. 1 1 3 1 5

Average salary n.r. $70,200 $56,000 $82,000 $70,000 5

Asset Recovery Agent; Assistant Chief Operations Officer; Capital & Investment Recovery Manager; Capital Sales Co-Ordinator; Director; Director of Investment Recovery Operations; Inventory Manager; Investment Recovery Administrator; Investment Recovery Analyst; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Leader; Investment Recovery Manager; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Leader; Logistics Manager; Manager; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manater - Materials Resource Recovery; Manager - Supply Operations Support; Manager, Investment Recovery; Manager Investment Recovery & Reversed Logistics; Manager Supply Operations Support; Manager, Generation Inventory Management; Manager, National Supply Management Programs; Manager, Supply Chain; Market Supply Manager; Materials Management Team Lead; Materials Manager; Procurement Manager - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist - Investment Recovery; Senior Buyer; Senior Manager - Procurement/Investment Recovery; Senior Purchases Manager; Sourcing Manager; Supervisor Investment Recovery; Supply Chain Representative

Chief Operations Officer; Customer Team Manager; Director; Director-Global Purchasing Machinery & Equipment; Director-Technical Procurement; Director Land Water & Asset Recovery; Director Material Distribution & Recovery Services; Director of Business Integration; Director of Procurement; Director of Procurement and Administration; Director of Purchasing Operations; Director of Supply Management; Director, Generation Supply Chain; Executive Director; Group Manager; Manager; Manager Corporate Transportation/Investment Recovery; Manager of Logistics; Manager of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management; Manager Supply Chain; Manager, Procurement Operations; Manager, Sourcing and Contracts; Managing Director; Managing Supervisor Materials Management; Materials Management Operations Manager; Procurement Manager; Purchase Contract Manager; Purchasing Leader; Purchasing Manager; Regional Category Manager; Section Leader Central Stores; Sr. Manager Materials Management; Supply Chain Director; Supply Chain Management

Asset Recovery Coordinator; Coordinator/Buyer, Asset Management; Corporate Investment Recovery Technologist; Disposal Sales Representative; INV Materials Handler II; Inventory Services Sales Agent; Inventory Specialist; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Team Leader; IR Analyst; IR Site Contact; Lead Investment Recovery Specialist; Manager - Investment Recovery; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manager Resource Recovery; Material Specialist; Materials Management Tech & Sr Field Materials Coordinator; Procurement Agent - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist III; Purchases Manager; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Regional Manager; Sales Manager Investment Recovery; Sales Specialist; Section Manager; Senior Engineering Tech; Senior Investment Recovery Specialist; Senior Logistics Planning Analyst; Specialist; Sr. Investment Recovery Supervisor; Sr. Materials Analyst; Sr/Advanced Supply Chain Analyst; Stores Supersvisor; Supervisor; Surplus Asset Sales & Service; Team Leader - Asset Recovery

Manager; Team Lead - Operations Purchasing; Vice President; VP - Environmental Health and Safety; VP of Supply Operations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

23

Page 24: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection II: Consumer Products, Foods, Pharmaceuticals

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Level III - Investment Recovery Representative

Title

1

Salary Range

Minimum n.r. i.d. 1

Maximum n.r. i.d. 1

Number of employees in position n.r. i.d. 1

Average salary n.r. i.d. 1

Level IV - Associate Investment Recovery Representative (Clerical, Support Staff) n.r.

Title

2

Salary Range

Minimum n.r. i.d. 2

Maximum n.r. i.d. 2

Number of employees in position n.r. i.d. 2

Average salary n.r. i.d. 2

Paid by Employer Paid by Employee Joint

Contribution # companies

32 Company benefits:

Professional Support:

Professional License Fees 66.67% 33.33% 0.00% 6

Professional Society Dues 66.67% 33.33% 0.00% 6

Professional Publications 66.67% 16.67% 16.67% 6

Continuing Education 83.33% 16.67% 0.00% 6

Administration; Adminstration Specialist; Administrative Assistant; Administrative Support, Senior; Asset Recovery Coordinator II; Assistant Asset Recovery Agent; Associate Investment Recovery Specialist; Clerk; District Material Management Specialist; Investment Recovery Advisor; Invoicing Clerk; IR Representative; IR Systems Administrator; Marketing Coordinator; Material Handler; Material Management Support Specialist; Materials Assistant; Operations Specialist; Purchasing Assistant; Purchasing Rep; Senior Support; Specialist; Warehouse Specialist & Group Leader, Office Administration

Asset Recovery Agent; Asset Recovery Coordinator I; Associate Supply Chain Analyst; Asst. Manager - Investment Recovery; Business Support - Investment Recovery Specialist; Facilitator; INV Materials Handler I; Inventory Analyst; Inventory Services Senior Specialist; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Logistics Planning Analyst; Material Management Supervisor; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Resource Recovery Specialist; Storekeeper; Supervisor; Technical Clerk; Warehouse Supervisor

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

24

Page 25: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection III: All Utilities Companies

Data Year: 2006Date Released: June 1, 2007

Ameren Services Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc. Portland General Electric CompanyArizona Public Service Company Progress Energy, Inc.BC Hydro & Power Authority PSEG Services CorporationConsumers Energy Corporation Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.Dominion Resources Services, Inc. Sempra EnergyDTE Energy Sierra Pacific Power CompanyDuquesne Light Company Southern California Edison CompanyExelon Corporation STP Nuclear Operating CompanyFirst Energy Corporation We EnergiesFlorida Power & Light Company Westar Energy, IncIdaho Power Company Wisconsin Public Service Corp.JEA Xcel Energy Inc.NiSource Corporate Services

A.

Total 185,831,514,513$ Average 8,079,631,066$ Median 6,890,700,000$ Range 265,000,000$ to $26,000,000,000

The following companies provided data for this study:

Sales (in dollars):

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

25

Page 26: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection III: Utilities Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Financial Information

1 Total cost benefit $9,353,016 $14,000 $45,350,000 $6,572,098 26

2 Total cost benefit as a percent of total company sales 0.18% 0.01% 0.76% 0.11% 22

3 Total cost benefit as a percent of sales attributed to business segments served 0.15% 0.04% 1.00% 0.10% 19

4 Total cost benefit dollars to operating expense dollars 19 3 68 12 22

5 Total cost benefit dollars per transaction $18,692 $560 $89,781 $9,361 20

6 Total cost benefit provided by each investment recovery employee $4,171,281 $14,000 $45,350,000 $1,308,003 26

7 Total cost benefit provided by each exempt investment recovery employee $5,350,166 $14,000 $45,350,000 $3,166,312 24

8 Investment recovery gross third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 30.90% 0.17% 88.96% 26.44% 9

9 Net third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 28.61% 0.14% 87.79% 30.74% 9

10 Gross sales dollars as a percent of total cost benefit 86.11% 28.57% 100.00% 93.92% 26

Internal transfers/redeployment activity as a percent of total cost benefit 5.16% 0.00% 71.43% 0.72% 25

Other cost avoidance as a percent of total cost benefit 9.29% 0.00% 68.81% 1.16% 25

11AOperating expense per investment recovery employee including outsourcing expenses

$105,190 $41,071 $225,992 $100,000 23

11BOperating expense per investment recovery employee excluding outsourcing expenses

$98,341 $39,881 $183,960 $100,000 23

12 Company IR employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 83.97% 34.78% 100.00% 86.80% 23

In-house IR contractors/consultants operating expense as a percent of total operating expense

4.19% 0.00% 57.97% 0.00% 23

Temporary employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 1.44% 0.00% 19.39% 0.00% 23

Direct cost of outsourced IR services as a percent of total operating expense 5.02% 0.00% 25.18% 0.00% 23

Other costs as a percent of total operating expense 5.39% 0.00% 38.69% 2.34% 23

13 Operating expense per transaction $1,328 $86 $6,495 $557 19

14Average company sales for 2006 for the portion of the company for which IR services are provided

$7,352,035,414 $1,800,000 $26,000,000,000 $5,232,000,000 23

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

26

Page 27: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection III: Utilities Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

Investment Recovery Processes and Best Practices

15 Percent of companies that outsource some IR activities or services 81.48% 27

Percent of companies that chose the following as one of the top five activities/ services outsourced in 2006

22

Appraisals 36.36%

Auction 72.73%

Bid or Negotiated Sales 36.36%

Dismantling/Demolition 59.09%

eAuction Sales 27.27%

Equipment refurbishment 9.09%

Internal Surplus redeployment 4.55%

Internal staff augmentation 13.64%

Offsite surplus storage/management 9.09%

Recycling 81.82%

Surplus identification/characterization 4.55%

Used equipment searches 18.18%

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

16 Average number of transactions per IR employee 277 3 1,054 169 22

17 Internal transfers/redeployments as a percent of total transactions 13.21% 0.00% 81.70% 6.25% 22

Third-party sales transactions as a percent of total transactions 86.79% 18.30% 100.00% 93.75% 22

18Percent of companies that require the use of Investment Recovery to dispose of surplus assets

70.37% 26

Percent of companies that encourage the use of Investment Recovery for disposal of surplus assets

18.52%

Percent of companies that have no policy regarding the use of Investment Recovery 11.11%

19 Percent of companies active in trying to prevent the generation of surplus assets 48.15% 27

Methods used:

20On a scale of 1 - 5, average rating of the following statements (1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree):

26

Senior executives understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.31

Operations managers understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.31

21 Percent of company's identified surplus assets managed 86.94% 50.00% 100.00% 90.00% 26

22

Average number of days surplus assets are typically held or considered for redeployment before being marketed for external sale

37 7 365 30 22

When supported by policy, average number of days assets are held prior to being marketed for external sale

105 14 360 30 5

All projects to look at surplus prior to starting procurement; Created IR clause to be included in purchasing contract to address total life cycle management of commodity; Early involvement with Project/Capital purchases; Leasing some capital assets; Moving equipment around to other internal projects; New software program being initiated to monitor and reduce redundancy; On-site vendor alliance contracts; On time delivery; Promoting buy back clauses; Provide trade-in clauses in purchase of new equipment; Return clauses in purchase contracts; Workshops with other organizations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

27

Page 28: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection III: Utilities Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

Previous Report In Place In Place In Progress Still an

Opportunity# Companies

Reporting

23Percent of companies that reported implementation of the following Investment Recovery Association best practices:

Strong Visible Management Support 37.04% 44.44% 18.52% 27

Surplus Asset Management Processes (identification, valuation, data base visibility, ssurplus matched with demand, etc.)

26.92% 26.92% 46.15% 26

Regular Reporting of Metrics and Successes 70.37% 18.52% 11.11% 27

Financial Incentives for Surplus Disposition 7.41% 11.11% 81.48% 27

Surplus and Refurbished Assets Considered before Buying New 25.93% 18.52% 55.56% 27

Early Involvement with Other Corporate Activities (capital projects, real estate sales, upgrades, demolition, divestitures, plant shut-downs, etc.)

18.52% 59.26% 22.22% 27

Supplier Integration and Support (IR service provider contracts in place, equipment refurbishment programs, integrated processes, etc.)

18.52% 37.04% 44.44% 27

Internet/intranet Utilization for Sales/Redeployment 18.52% 29.63% 51.85% 27

Surplus Prevention and Return-to-Supplier processes 14.81% 51.85% 33.33% 27

External Networking 55.56% 37.04% 7.41% 27

Value Chain (Decision Hierarchy) Approach to Surplus Asset Disposition 59.26% 22.22% 14.81% 27

24 Other IR processes considered by companies as good/best practices

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Electronic Commerce

25Percent of total sales/redeployment that resulted from the use of the Internet/intranet

External sales via Internet Posting (excluding eAuctions) 20.08% 1.00% 90.00% 10.00% 15

External sales via eAuctions 19.32% 0.50% 90.00% 5.00% 11

External sales via 3rd-party sellers or brokers (excluding eAuctions) 36.95% 1.24% 100.00% 20.00% 15

Redeployment via intranet - percent of total transfers 10.64% 1.00% 40.00% 7.00% 11

26Percent of companies with IR function responsible for locating and purchasing used machinery and equipment

3.70% 27

Accountability and targets in place in personal performance contracts; Active with groups within our company to get the word out of the advantages of Investment Recovery; Activities integrated with Corporate Community Relations/donations and Environmental Services; Awareness sessions company wide; Computer reconditioning and donation practices to extend useful life, reduce waste and build relations with stakeholders; Developing a reclamation plan for base metal catalyst as opposed to land fill; Internal Computer Lab - Data security cleansing to insure private and confidential information is protected; Establishing a national electronic Asset Management System for reporting all asset action; Process in place to "loan" refrigeration equipment out to our stores for short term use during construction projects; Purchase of surplus assets as an option to purchasing new items; Recycling efforts for day-to-day items and also for new construction; Recycling of excess/obsolete computers through Goodwill Industries; Sharing of ideas; Storeroom inventory reclamation and recovery; The use of excess assets to alleviate offset obligation

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

28

Page 29: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection III: Utilities Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

27Percent of companies that use the following types of information systems for internal redeployment and surplus sales:

27

Combined company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, web-based 7.41%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales systems, both web-based

11.11%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, only surplus sales system web-based

7.41%

One internal deployment system, plus multiple surplus sales systems, some web-based

25.93%

No web-based information systems - use posted spreadsheets, lists, faxes and/or email only

37.04%

Other 11.11%

List:

28Percent of companies that use the following web-based technologies to promote surplus sales:

22

Maintain own company surplus sales website 45.45%

Actively submit company surplus sales website(s) to search engines for indexing 4.55%

Maintain and use database or email list of prospective buyers 90.91%

Rely solely on outside contract sales and auction firms 18.18%

Rely on third-party websites for marketing of surplus 40.91%

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Investment Recovery Staffing

29 Investment recovery employees as a percent of total company employees 0.14% 0.01% 0.76% 0.05% 27

Exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees 67.97% 0.00% 100.00% 75.00% 24

Non-exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees

25.19% 0.00% 100.00% 10.60% 24

In-house contractors as a percent of total IR employees 6.85% 0.00% 89.29% 0.00% 24

30 Percent of FTE IR employees that have:

Bachelor's degree 38.67% 0.00% 100.00% 33.00% 27

Master's degree 12.77% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 26

Professional certification 23.60% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 27

Less than 5 years of IR experience 27.30% 0.00% 100.00% 20.00% 27

Between 5 and 15 years of IR experience 36.29% 0.00% 100.00% 25.00% 26

More than 15 years of IR experience 22.57% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 27

Broker Web based site; email and web based; engineering network conducts most activity; web company-wide redeployment system. Most surplus sales handled by the BU.

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

29

Page 30: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection III: Utilities Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

31 Investment Recovery Salaries

Level I (Top Position) - Function Head, Investment Recovery

Title

24

Reports to (Title)

24

Salary Range

Minimum $74,046 $45,000 $105,000 $73,100 21

Maximum $101,658 $65,000 $145,000 $95,500 22

Average salary $83,809 $50,000 $135,000 $80,000 19

Number of employees supervised

Direct 5 1 18 4 18

Indirect 13 1 75 3 11

Level II - Sr. Investment Recovery Representative

Title

20

Salary Range

Minimum $60,314 $34,028 $95,000 $55,600 17

Maximum $79,724 $42,556 $120,000 $78,000 17

Number of employees in position 1 1 4 1 16

Average salary $69,431 $40,996 $115,000 $68,200 14

Asset Recovery Agent; Assistant Chief Operations Officer; Capital & Investment Recovery Manager; Capital Sales Co-Ordinator; Director; Director of Investment Recovery Operations; Inventory Manager; Investment Recovery Administrator; Investment Recovery Analyst; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Leader; Investment Recovery Manager; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Leader; Logistics Manager; Manager; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manater - Materials Resource Recovery; Manager - Supply Operations Support; Manager, Investment Recovery; Manager Investment Recovery & Reversed Logistics; Manager Supply Operations Support; Manager, Generation Inventory Management; Manager, National Supply Management Programs; Manager, Supply Chain; Market Supply Manager; Materials Management Team Lead; Materials Manager; Procurement Manager - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist - Investment Recovery; Senior Buyer; Senior Manager - Procurement/Investment Recovery; Senior Purchases Manager; Sourcing Manager; Supervisor Investment Recovery; Supply Chain Representative

Chief Operations Officer; Customer Team Manager; Director; Director-Global Purchasing Machinery & Equipment; Director-Technical Procurement; Director Land Water & Asset Recovery; Director Material Distribution & Recovery Services; Director of Business Integration; Director of Procurement; Director of Procurement and Administration; Director of Purchasing Operations; Director of Supply Management; Director, Generation Supply Chain; Executive Director; Group Manager; Manager; Manager Corporate Transportation/Investment Recovery; Manager of Logistics; Manager of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management; Manager Supply Chain; Manager, Procurement Operations; Manager, Sourcing and Contracts; Managing Director; Managing Supervisor Materials Management; Materials Management Operations Manager; Procurement Manager; Purchase Contract Manager; Purchasing Leader; Purchasing Manager; Regional Category Manager; Section Leader Central Stores; Sr. Manager Materials Management; Supply Chain Director; Supply Chain Management

Asset Recovery Coordinator; Coordinator/Buyer, Asset Management; Corporate Investment Recovery Technologist; Disposal Sales Representative; INV Materials Handler II; Inventory Services Sales Agent; Inventory Specialist; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Team Leader; IR Analyst; IR Site Contact; Lead Investment Recovery Specialist; Manager - Investment Recovery; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manager Resource Recovery; Material Specialist; Materials Management Tech & Sr Field Materials Coordinator; Procurement Agent - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist III; Purchases Manager; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Regional Manager; Sales Manager Investment Recovery; Sales Specialist; Section Manager; Senior Engineering Tech; Senior Investment Recovery Specialist; Senior Logistics Planning Analyst; Specialist; Sr. Investment Recovery Supervisor; Sr. Materials Analyst; Sr/Advanced Supply Chain Analyst; Stores Supersvisor; Supervisor; Surplus Asset Sales & Service; Team Leader - Asset Recovery

Manager; Team Lead - Operations Purchasing; Vice President; VP - Environmental Health and Safety; VP of Supply Operations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

30

Page 31: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection III: Utilities Companies

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks No Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Level III - Investment Recovery Representative

Title

17

Salary Range

Minimum $49,457 $25,251 $75,000 $46,650 16

Maximum $66,970 $31,553 $108,000 $62,530 16

Number of employees in position 3 0 12 1 16

Average salary $56,951 $29,910 $86,000 $56,796 14

Level IV - Associate Investment Recovery Representative (Clerical, Support Staff)

Title

13

Salary Range

Minimum $36,757 $25,000 $60,988 $36,800 13

Maximum $47,534 $26,500 $88,437 $42,000 13

Number of employees in position 1 1 2 1 14

Average salary $43,601 $26,500 $67,000 $41,634 14

Paid by Employer Paid by Employee Joint

Contribution # companies

32 Company benefits:

Professional Support:

Professional License Fees 80.77% 7.69% 11.54% 26

Professional Society Dues 88.89% 3.70% 7.41% 27

Professional Publications 88.46% 7.69% 3.85% 26

Continuing Education 48.15% 0.00% 51.85% 27

Administration; Adminstration Specialist; Administrative Assistant; Administrative Support, Senior; Asset Recovery Coordinator II; Assistant Asset Recovery Agent; Associate Investment Recovery Specialist; Clerk; District Material Management Specialist; Investment Recovery Advisor; Invoicing Clerk; IR Representative; IR Systems Administrator; Marketing Coordinator; Material Handler; Material Management Support Specialist; Materials Assistant; Operations Specialist; Purchasing Assistant; Purchasing Rep; Senior Support; Specialist; Warehouse Specialist & Group Leader, Office Administration

Asset Recovery Agent; Asset Recovery Coordinator I; Associate Supply Chain Analyst; Asst. Manager - Investment Recovery; Business Support - Investment Recovery Specialist; Facilitator; INV Materials Handler I; Inventory Analyst; Inventory Services Senior Specialist; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Logistics Planning Analyst; Material Management Supervisor; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Resource Recovery Specialist; Storekeeper; Supervisor; Technical Clerk; Warehouse Supervisor

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

31

Page 32: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection IV: Utilities with Sales Greater Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Date Released: June 1, 2007

American Electric Power Company, Inc. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyConsumers Energy Corporation Progress Energy, Inc.Dominion Resources Services, Inc. PSEG Services CorporationDTE Energy Sempra EnergyExelon Corporation Southern California Edison CompanyFirst Energy Corporation Wisconsin Public Service Corp.Florida Power & Light Company Xcel Energy Inc.NiSource Corporate Services

A.

Total 165,817,700,000$ Average 11,054,513,333$ Median 10,312,000,000$ Range 5,200,000,000$ to $26,000,000,000

The following companies provided data for this study:

Sales (in dollars):

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

32

Page 33: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection IV: Utilities with Sales Greater Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Financial Information

1 Total cost benefit $7,332,155 $13,379,239 $1,001,399 $45,350,000 $12,000,000 15

2 Total cost benefit as a percent of total company sales 0.09% 0.14% 0.01% 0.76% 0.10% 15

3 Total cost benefit as a percent of sales attributed to business segments served 0.10% 0.10% 0.04% 0.21% 0.10% 14

4 Total cost benefit dollars to operating expense dollars 18.1 24 4 68 19 14

5 Total cost benefit dollars per transaction $648,703 $16,827 $1,033 $89,781 $9,147 11

6 Total cost benefit provided by each investment recovery employee $2,291,242 $5,727,329 $222,024 $45,350,000 $2,960,000 15

7 Total cost benefit provided by each exempt investment recovery employee $3,344,615 $6,927,839 $1,001,399 $45,350,000 $3,172,625 15

8 Investment recovery gross third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 85.59% 31.23% 0.17% 88.96% 23.39% 7

9 Net third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 78.60% 28.66% 0.14% 87.79% 20.35% 6

10 Gross sales dollars as a percent of total cost benefit 85.59% 90.79% 73.68% 100.00% 91.69% 15

Internal transfers/redeployment activity as a percent of total cost benefit 5.16% 3.83% 0.00% 10.53% 2.14% 14

Other cost avoidance as a percent of total cost benefit 22.37% 6.04% 0.00% 23.44% 1.11% 14

11AOperating expense per investment recovery employee including outsourcing expenses

$123,764 $112,602 $41,071 $225,992 $103,000 15

11BOperating expense per investment recovery employee excluding outsourcing expenses

n.r. $104,557 $39,881 $183,960 $103,000 15

12 Company IR employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 79.83% 82.81% 34.78% 100.00% 85.60% 15

In-house IR contractors/consultants operating expense as a percent of total operating expense

n.r. 6.42% 0.00% 57.97% 0.00% 15

Temporary employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 1.42% 0.00% 19.39% 0.00% 15

Direct cost of outsourced IR services as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 5.42% 0.00% 24.34% 0.00% 15

Other costs as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 3.93% 0.00% 25.88% 2.15% 15

13 Operating expense per transaction $33,878 $870 $86 $2,752 $544 12

14Average company sales for 2006 for the portion of the company for which IR services are provided

$7,521,707,000 $10,077,960,000 $50,000,000 $26,000,000,000 $10,312,000,000 15

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

33

Page 34: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection IV: Utilities with Sales Greater Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

Investment Recovery Processes and Best Practices

15 Percent of companies that outsource some IR activities or services 87.50% 86.67% 15

Percent of companies that chose the following as one of the top five activities/ services outsourced in 2006

13

Appraisals 14.29% 46.15%

Auction 100.00% 69.23%

Bid or Negotiated Sales 14.29% 23.08%

Dismantling/Demolition 42.86% 53.85%

eAuction Sales 28.57% 30.77%

Equipment refurbishment 28.57% 7.69%

Internal Surplus redeployment 0.00% 0.00%

Internal staff augmentation 0.00% 15.38%

Offsite surplus storage/management 0.00% 7.69%

Recycling 42.86% 76.92%

Surplus identification/characterization 0.00% 7.69%

Used equipment searches 0.00% 23.08%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

16 Average number of transactions per IR employee 145 363 24 1,054 262 12

17 Internal transfers/redeployments as a percent of total transactions 32.62% 15.21% 1.13% 81.70% 7.83% 12

Third-party sales transactions as a percent of total transactions 93.91% 84.79% 18.30% 98.87% 92.17% 12

18Percent of companies that require the use of Investment Recovery to dispose of surplus assets

77.78% 86.67% 14

Percent of companies that encourage the use of Investment Recovery for disposal of surplus assets

n.r. 13.33%

Percent of companies that have no policy regarding the use of Investment Recovery n.r. 0.00%

19 Percent of companies active in trying to prevent the generation of surplus assets 25.00% 53.33% 15

Methods used:

20On a scale of 1 - 5, average rating of the following statements (1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree):

14

Senior executives understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.38 3.64

Operations managers understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.25 3.57

21 Percent of company's identified surplus assets managed 86.31% 88.24% 60.00% 100.00% 90.00% 14

22

Average number of days surplus assets are typically held or considered for redeployment before being marketed for external sale

35 34 7 365 30 11

When supported by policy, average number of days assets are held prior to being marketed for external sale

n.r. i.d. 3

All projects to look at surplus prior to starting procurement; Created IR clause to be included in purchasing contract to address total life cycle management of commodity; Early involvement with Project/Capital purchases; Leasing some capital assets; Moving equipment around to other internal projects; New software program being initiated to monitor and reduce redundancy; On-site vendor alliance contracts; On time delivery; Promoting buy back clauses; Provide trade-in clauses in purchase of new equipment; Return clauses in purchase contracts; Workshops with other organizations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

34

Page 35: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection IV: Utilities with Sales Greater Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

Previous Report In Place In Place In Progress Still an

Opportunity# Companies

Reporting

23Percent of companies that reported implementation of the following Investment Recovery Association best practices:

Strong Visible Management Support 37.50% 46.67% 46.67% 6.67% 15

Surplus Asset Management Processes (identification, valuation, data base visibility, ssurplus matched with demand, etc.)

37.50% 42.86% 21.43% 35.71% 14

Regular Reporting of Metrics and Successes 87.50% 86.67% 13.33% 0.00% 15

Financial Incentives for Surplus Disposition 37.50% 13.33% 20.00% 66.67% 15

Surplus and Refurbished Assets Considered before Buying New 37.50% 33.33% 6.67% 60.00% 15

Early Involvement with Other Corporate Activities (capital projects, real estate sales, upgrades, demolition, divestitures, plant shut-downs, etc.)

25.00% 26.67% 53.33% 20.00% 15

Supplier Integration and Support (IR service provider contracts in place, equipment refurbishment programs, integrated processes, etc.)

37.50% 20.00% 33.33% 46.67% 15

Internet/intranet Utilization for Sales/Redeployment 25.00% 26.67% 33.33% 40.00% 15

Surplus Prevention and Return-to-Supplier processes 37.50% 13.33% 40.00% 46.67% 15

External Networking 50.00% 66.67% 33.33% 0.00% 15

Value Chain (Decision Hierarchy) Approach to Surplus Asset Disposition 50.00% 66.67% 20.00% 6.67% 15

24 Other IR processes considered by companies as good/best practices

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Electronic Commerce

25Percent of total sales/redeployment that resulted from the use of the Internet/intranet

External sales via Internet Posting (excluding eAuctions) 2.83% 16.56% 1.00% 90.00% 7.00% 9

External sales via eAuctions 22.00% 15.79% 0.50% 80.00% 5.00% 7

External sales via 3rd-party sellers or brokers (excluding eAuctions) 33.40% 33.66% 1.24% 100.00% 17.50% 8

Redeployment via intranet - percent of total transfers 0.25% 10.57% 1.00% 40.00% 7.00% 7

26Percent of companies with IR function responsible for locating and purchasing used machinery and equipment

n.r. 6.67% 15

Accountability and targets in place in personal performance contracts; Active with groups within our company to get the word out of the advantages of Investment Recovery; Activities integrated with Corporate Community Relations/donations and Environmental Services; Awareness sessions company wide; Computer reconditioning and donation practices to extend useful life, reduce waste and build relations with stakeholders; Developing a reclamation plan for base metal catalyst as opposed to land fill; Internal Computer Lab - Data security cleansing to insure private and confidential information is protected; Establishing a national electronic Asset Management System for reporting all asset action; Process in place to "loan" refrigeration equipment out to our stores for short term use during construction projects; Purchase of surplus assets as an option to purchasing new items; Recycling efforts for day-to-day items and also for new construction;Recycling of excess/obsolete computers through Goodwill Industries; Sharing of ideas; Storeroom inventory reclamation and recovery; The use of excess assets to alleviate offset obligation

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

35

Page 36: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection IV: Utilities with Sales Greater Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

27Percent of companies that use the following types of information systems for internal redeployment and surplus sales:

15

Combined company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, web-based 0.00% 6.67%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales systems, both web-based

12.50% 20.00%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, only surplus sales system web-based

0.00% 6.67%

One internal deployment system, plus multiple surplus sales systems, some web-based

25.00% 20.00%

No web-based information systems - use posted spreadsheets, lists, faxes and/or email only

50.00% 40.00%

Other 12.50% 6.67%

List:

28Percent of companies that use the following web-based technologies to promote surplus sales:

14

Maintain own company surplus sales website 37.50% 42.86%

Actively submit company surplus sales website(s) to search engines for indexing 12.50% 7.14%

Maintain and use database or email list of prospective buyers 62.50% 92.86%

Rely solely on outside contract sales and auction firms 50.00% 21.43%

Rely on third-party websites for marketing of surplus 37.50% 28.57%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Investment Recovery Staffing

29 Investment recovery employees as a percent of total company employees 0.06% 0.09% 0.01% 0.76% 0.04% 15

Exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees 69.64% 68.52% 9.52% 100.00% 75.00% 15

Non-exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees

56.55% 20.52% 0.00% 66.67% 20.00% 15

In-house contractors as a percent of total IR employees n.r. 10.95% 0.00% 89.29% 0.00% 15

30 Percent of FTE IR employees that have:

Bachelor's degree 65.13% 45.60% 0.00% 100.00% 40.00% 15

Master's degree n.r. 13.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 14

Professional certification 37.75% 19.16% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 15

Less than 5 years of IR experience n.r. 30.47% 0.00% 100.00% 25.00% 15

Between 5 and 15 years of IR experience 46.67% 45.26% 0.00% 100.00% 42.50% 14

More than 15 years of IR experience 67.00% 20.62% 0.00% 60.00% 25.00% 15

Broker Web based site; email and web based; engineering network conducts most activity; web company-wide redeployment system. Most surplus sales handled by the BU.

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

36

Page 37: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection IV: Utilities with Sales Greater Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

31 Investment Recovery Salaries

Level I (Top Position) - Function Head, Investment Recovery

Title

14

Reports to (Title)

14

Salary Range

Minimum n.r. $75,730 $45,000 $105,000 $75,000 13

Maximum n.r. $106,065 $65,000 $145,000 $106,500 14

Average salary $81,250 $89,764 $50,000 $135,000 $90,000 11

Number of employees supervised

Direct 7 4 1 8 4 11

Indirect 7 17 1 75 5 6

Level II - Sr. Investment Recovery Representative

Title

12

Salary Range

Minimum n.r. $63,595 $45,000 $95,000 $65,000 11

Maximum n.r. $84,115 $65,000 $120,000 $83,400 11

Number of employees in position 1 1 1 2 1 10

Average salary $31,200 $76,364 $50,000 $115,000 $74,108 10

Asset Recovery Agent; Assistant Chief Operations Officer; Capital & Investment Recovery Manager; Capital Sales Co-Ordinator; Director; Director of Investment Recovery Operations; Inventory Manager; Investment Recovery Administrator; Investment Recovery Analyst; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Leader; Investment Recovery Manager; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Leader; Logistics Manager; Manager; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manater - Materials Resource Recovery; Manager - Supply Operations Support; Manager, Investment Recovery; Manager Investment Recovery & Reversed Logistics; Manager Supply Operations Support; Manager, Generation Inventory Management; Manager, National Supply Management Programs; Manager, Supply Chain; Market Supply Manager; Materials Management Team Lead; Materials Manager; Procurement Manager - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist - Investment Recovery; Senior Buyer; Senior Manager - Procurement/Investment Recovery; Senior Purchases Manager; Sourcing Manager; Supervisor Investment Recovery; Supply Chain Representative

Chief Operations Officer; Customer Team Manager; Director; Director-Global Purchasing Machinery & Equipment; Director-Technical Procurement; Director Land Water & Asset Recovery; Director Material Distribution & Recovery Services; Director of Business Integration; Director of Procurement; Director of Procurement and Administration; Director of Purchasing Operations; Director of Supply Management; Director, Generation Supply Chain; Executive Director; Group Manager; Manager; Manager Corporate Transportation/Investment Recovery; Manager of Logistics; Manager of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management; Manager Supply Chain; Manager, Procurement Operations; Manager, Sourcing and Contracts; Managing Director; Managing Supervisor Materials Management; Materials Management Operations Manager; Procurement Manager; Purchase Contract Manager; Purchasing Leader; Purchasing Manager; Regional Category Manager; Section Leader Central Stores; Sr. Manager Materials Management; Supply Chain Director; Supply Chain Management

Asset Recovery Coordinator; Coordinator/Buyer, Asset Management; Corporate Investment Recovery Technologist; Disposal Sales Representative; INV Materials Handler II; Inventory Services Sales Agent; Inventory Specialist; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Team Leader; IR Analyst; IR Site Contact; Lead Investment Recovery Specialist; Manager - Investment Recovery; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manager Resource Recovery; Material Specialist; Materials Management Tech & Sr Field Materials Coordinator; Procurement Agent - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist III; Purchases Manager; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Regional Manager; Sales Manager Investment Recovery; Sales Specialist; Section Manager; Senior Engineering Tech; Senior Investment Recovery Specialist; Senior Logistics Planning Analyst; Specialist; Sr. Investment Recovery Supervisor; Sr. Materials Analyst; Sr/Advanced Supply Chain Analyst; Stores Supersvisor; Supervisor; Surplus Asset Sales & Service; Team Leader - Asset Recovery

Manager; Team Lead - Operations Purchasing; Vice President; VP - Environmental Health and Safety; VP of Supply Operations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

37

Page 38: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection IV: Utilities with Sales Greater Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Level III - Investment Recovery Representative

Title

11

Salary Range

Minimum n.r. $53,859 $33,000 $75,000 $57,000 11

Maximum n.r. $74,285 $48,000 $108,000 $69,000 11

Number of employees in position n.r. 2 0 4 1 11

Average salary n.r. $62,418 $30,000 $86,000 $63,000 9

Level IV - Associate Investment Recovery Representative (Clerical, Support Staff)

Title

8

Salary Range

Minimum n.r. $38,560 $25,000 $60,988 $37,956 9

Maximum n.r. $51,555 $36,000 $88,437 $50,000 9

Number of employees in position n.r. 1 1 2 1 9

Average salary n.r. $45,854 $30,000 $67,000 $43,836 9

Paid by Employer Paid by Employee Joint

Contribution # companies

32 Company benefits:

Professional Support:

Professional License Fees 86.67% 6.67% 6.67% 15

Professional Society Dues 86.67% 6.67% 6.67% 15

Professional Publications 86.67% 6.67% 6.67% 15

Continuing Education 46.67% 0.00% 53.33% 15

Administration; Adminstration Specialist; Administrative Assistant; Administrative Support, Senior; Asset Recovery Coordinator II; Assistant Asset Recovery Agent; Associate Investment Recovery Specialist; Clerk; District Material Management Specialist; Investment Recovery Advisor; Invoicing Clerk; IR Representative; IR Systems Administrator; Marketing Coordinator; Material Handler; Material Management Support Specialist; Materials Assistant; Operations Specialist; Purchasing Assistant; Purchasing Rep; Senior Support; Specialist; Warehouse Specialist & Group Leader, Office Administration

Asset Recovery Agent; Asset Recovery Coordinator I; Associate Supply Chain Analyst; Asst. Manager - Investment Recovery; Business Support - Investment Recovery Specialist; Facilitator; INV Materials Handler I; Inventory Analyst; Inventory Services Senior Specialist; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Logistics Planning Analyst; Material Management Supervisor; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Resource Recovery Specialist; Storekeeper; Supervisor; Technical Clerk; Warehouse Supervisor

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

38

Page 39: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection V: Utilities with Sales Less Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Date Released: June 1, 2007

Ameren Services Portland General Electric CompanyArizona Public Service Company Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.BC Hydro & Power Authority Sierra Pacific Power CompanyDuquesne Light Company STP Nuclear Operating CompanyIdaho Power Company We EnergiesJEA Westar Energy, Inc

A.

Total 20,013,814,513$ Average 2,501,726,814$ Median 2,372,802,303$ Range 265,000,000$ to $4,800,000,000

The following companies provided data for this study:

Sales (in dollars):

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

39

Page 40: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection V: Utilities with Sales Less Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Financial Information

1 Total cost benefit $3,324,185 $3,862,711 $14,000 $10,842,456 $3,696,769 11

2 Total cost benefit as a percent of total company sales 3.48% 0.25% 0.04% 0.75% 0.16% 7

3 Total cost benefit as a percent of sales attributed to business segments served 3.49% 0.28% 0.04% 1.00% 0.10% 5

4 Total cost benefit dollars to operating expense dollars 12.73 10 3 33 6 8

5 Total cost benefit dollars per transaction $7,107 $20,972 $560 $67,765 $11,417 9

6 Total cost benefit provided by each investment recovery employee $916,186 $2,049,396 $14,000 $10,842,456 $608,333 11

7 Total cost benefit provided by each exempt investment recovery employee $1,319,230 $2,720,712 $14,000 $10,842,456 $1,000,000 9

8 Investment recovery gross third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 74.79% i.d. 2

9 Net third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 65.38% i.d. 3

10 Gross sales dollars as a percent of total cost benefit 74.79% 79.73% 28.57% 100.00% 97.94% 11

Internal transfers/redeployment activity as a percent of total cost benefit 12.82% 6.85% 0.00% 71.43% 0.01% 11

Other cost avoidance as a percent of total cost benefit 27.22% 13.42% 0.00% 68.81% 1.37% 11

11AOperating expense per investment recovery employee including outsourcing expenses

$88,073 $91,294 $50,211 $153,486 $83,600 8

11BOperating expense per investment recovery employee excluding outsourcing expenses

n.r. $86,685 $50,211 $153,486 $76,122 8

12 Company IR employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 86.15% 86.14% 53.33% 100.00% 96.45% 8

In-house IR contractors/consultants operating expense as a percent of total operating expense

n.r. 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 8

Temporary employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 1.47% 0.00% 7.80% 0.00% 8

Direct cost of outsourced IR services as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 4.26% 0.00% 25.18% 0.00% 8

Other costs as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 8.13% 0.00% 38.69% 2.78% 8

13 Operating expense per transaction $934 $2,115 $200 $6,495 $813 7

14Average company sales for 2006 for the portion of the company for which IR services are provided

$1,680,295,643 $2,240,926,814 $1,800,000 $4,800,000,000 $1,772,802,303 8

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

40

Page 41: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection V: Utilities with Sales Less Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

Investment Recovery Processes and Best Practices

15 Percent of companies that outsource some IR activities or services 57.14% 75.00% 12

Percent of companies that chose the following as one of the top five activities/ services outsourced in 2006

9

Appraisals 37.50% 22.22%

Auction 87.50% 77.78%

Bid or Negotiated Sales 50.00% 55.56%

Dismantling/Demolition 37.50% 66.67%

eAuction Sales 25.00% 22.22%

Equipment refurbishment 37.50% 11.11%

Internal Surplus redeployment 0.00% 11.11%

Internal staff augmentation 0.00% 11.11%

Offsite surplus storage/management 0.00% 11.11%

Recycling 71.43% 88.89%

Surplus identification/characterization 12.50% 0.00%

Used equipment searches 12.50% 11.11%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

16 Average number of transactions per IR employee 191 175 3 640 56 10

17 Internal transfers/redeployments as a percent of total transactions 36.35% 10.82% 0.00% 42.17% 3.17% 10

Third-party sales transactions as a percent of total transactions 78.04% 89.18% 57.83% 100.00% 96.83% 10

18Percent of companies that require the use of Investment Recovery to dispose of surplus assets

85.71% 50.00% 12

Percent of companies that encourage the use of Investment Recovery for disposal of surplus assets

n.r. 25.00%

Percent of companies that have no policy regarding the use of Investment Recovery n.r. 25.00%

19 Percent of companies active in trying to prevent the generation of surplus assets 50.00% 41.67% 12

Methods used:

20On a scale of 1 - 5, average rating of the following statements (1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree):

12

Senior executives understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.50 2.92

Operations managers understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.29 3.00

21 Percent of company's identified surplus assets managed 79.64% 85.42% 50.00% 100.00% 92.50% 12

22

Average number of days surplus assets are typically held or considered for redeployment before being marketed for external sale

44 41 30 365 30 11

When supported by policy, average number of days assets are held prior to being marketed for external sale

n.r. i.d. 2

All projects to look at surplus prior to starting procurement; Created IR clause to be included in purchasing contract to address total life cycle management of commodity; Early involvement with Project/Capital purchases; Leasing some capital assets; Moving equipment around to other internal projects; New software program being initiated to monitor and reduce redundancy; On-site vendor alliance contracts; On time delivery; Promoting buy back clauses; Provide trade-in clauses in purchase of new equipment; Return clauses in purchase contracts; Workshops with other organizations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

41

Page 42: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection V: Utilities with Sales Less Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

Previous Report In Place In Place In Progress Still an

Opportunity# Companies

Reporting

23Percent of companies that reported implementation of the following Investment Recovery Association best practices:

Strong Visible Management Support 35.71% 25.00% 41.67% 33.33% 12

Surplus Asset Management Processes (identification, valuation, data base visibility, ssurplus matched with demand, etc.)

42.86% 8.33% 33.33% 58.33% 12

Regular Reporting of Metrics and Successes 50.00% 50.00% 25.00% 25.00% 12

Financial Incentives for Surplus Disposition 14.29% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 12

Surplus and Refurbished Assets Considered before Buying New 14.29% 16.67% 33.33% 50.00% 12

Early Involvement with Other Corporate Activities (capital projects, real estate sales, upgrades, demolition, divestitures, plant shut-downs, etc.)

7.14% 8.33% 66.67% 25.00% 12

Supplier Integration and Support (IR service provider contracts in place, equipment refurbishment programs, integrated processes, etc.)

14.29% 16.67% 41.67% 41.67% 12

Internet/intranet Utilization for Sales/Redeployment 21.43% 8.33% 25.00% 66.67% 12

Surplus Prevention and Return-to-Supplier processes 7.14% 16.67% 66.67% 16.67% 12

External Networking 28.57% 41.67% 41.67% 16.67% 12

Value Chain (Decision Hierarchy) Approach to Surplus Asset Disposition 28.57% 50.00% 25.00% 25.00% 12

24 Other IR processes considered by companies as good/best practices

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Electronic Commerce

25Percent of total sales/redeployment that resulted from the use of the Internet/intranet

External sales via Internet Posting (excluding eAuctions) 26.31% 25.36% 2.00% 83.00% 17.50% 6

External sales via eAuctions 9.86% 25.50% 4

External sales via 3rd-party sellers or brokers (excluding eAuctions) 25.50% 40.71% 1.98% 100.00% 33.00% 7

Redeployment via intranet - percent of total transfers 13.00% 10.75% 4

26Percent of companies with IR function responsible for locating and purchasing used machinery and equipment

n.r. 0.00% 12

Accountability and targets in place in personal performance contracts; Active with groups within our company to get the word out of the advantages of Investment Recovery; Activities integrated with Corporate Community Relations/donations and Environmental Services; Awareness sessions company wide; Computer reconditioning and donation practices to extend useful life, reduce waste and build relations with stakeholders; Developing a reclamation plan for base metal catalyst as opposed to land fill; Internal Computer Lab - Data security cleansing to insure private and confidential information is protected; Establishing a national electronic Asset Management System for reporting all asset action; Process in place to "loan" refrigeration equipment out to our stores for short term use during construction projects; Purchase of surplus assets as an option to purchasing new items; Recycling efforts for day-to-day items and also for new construction; Recycling of excess/obsolete computers through Goodwill Industries; Sharing of ideas; Storeroom inventory reclamation and recovery; The use of excess assets to alleviate offset obligation

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

42

Page 43: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection V: Utilities with Sales Less Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

27Percent of companies that use the following types of information systems for internal redeployment and surplus sales:

12

Combined company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, web-based 0.00% 8.33%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales systems, both web-based

7.14% 0.00%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, only surplus sales system web-based

14.29% 8.33%

One internal deployment system, plus multiple surplus sales systems, some web-based

14.29% 33.33%

No web-based information systems - use posted spreadsheets, lists, faxes and/or email only

35.71% 33.33%

Other 28.57% 16.67%

List:

28Percent of companies that use the following web-based technologies to promote surplus sales:

8

Maintain own company surplus sales website 28.57% 50.00%

Actively submit company surplus sales website(s) to search engines for indexing 14.29% 0.00%

Maintain and use database or email list of prospective buyers 78.57% 87.50%

Rely solely on outside contract sales and auction firms 21.43% 12.50%

Rely on third-party websites for marketing of surplus 21.43% 62.50%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Investment Recovery Staffing

29 Investment recovery employees as a percent of total company employees 0.18% 0.20% 0.02% 0.46% 0.16% 12

Exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees 68.41% 67.04% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 9

Non-exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees

64.14% 32.96% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 9

In-house contractors as a percent of total IR employees n.r. 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9

30 Percent of FTE IR employees that have:

Bachelor's degree 62.14% 30.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 12

Master's degree 66.25% 12.50% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 12

Professional certification 60.00% 29.17% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 12

Less than 5 years of IR experience 47.25% 23.33% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 12

Between 5 and 15 years of IR experience 57.22% 25.83% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 12

More than 15 years of IR experience 63.25% 25.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 12

Broker Web based site; email and web based; engineering network conducts most activity; web company-wide redeployment system. Most surplus sales handled by the BU.

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

43

Page 44: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection V: Utilities with Sales Less Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

31 Investment Recovery Salaries

Level I (Top Position) - Function Head, Investment Recovery

Title

10

Reports to (Title)

10

Salary Range

Minimum $67,865 $71,309 $59,505 $90,000 $69,050 8

Maximum $92,772 $93,946 $74,464 $125,000 $93,304 8

Average salary $81,961 $75,621 $64,900 $92,000 $72,232 8

Number of employees supervised

Direct 5 7 1 18 6 7

Indirect 5 9 1 38 1 5

Level II - Sr. Investment Recovery Representative

Title

8

Salary Range

Minimum $56,583 $54,298 $34,028 $76,000 $51,881 6

Maximum $75,307 $71,674 $42,556 $108,000 $74,244 6

Number of employees in position 2 2 1 4 1 6

Average salary $54,885 $52,099 4

Asset Recovery Agent; Assistant Chief Operations Officer; Capital & Investment Recovery Manager; Capital Sales Co-Ordinator; Director; Director of Investment Recovery Operations; Inventory Manager; Investment Recovery Administrator; Investment Recovery Analyst; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Leader; Investment Recovery Manager; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Leader; Logistics Manager; Manager; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manater - Materials Resource Recovery; Manager - Supply Operations Support; Manager, Investment Recovery; Manager Investment Recovery & Reversed Logistics; Manager Supply Operations Support; Manager, Generation Inventory Management; Manager, National Supply Management Programs; Manager, Supply Chain; Market Supply Manager; Materials Management Team Lead; Materials Manager; Procurement Manager - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist - Investment Recovery; Senior Buyer; Senior Manager - Procurement/Investment Recovery; Senior Purchases Manager; Sourcing Manager; Supervisor Investment Recovery; Supply Chain Representative

Chief Operations Officer; Customer Team Manager; Director; Director-Global Purchasing Machinery & Equipment; Director-Technical Procurement; Director Land Water & Asset Recovery; Director Material Distribution & Recovery Services; Director of Business Integration; Director of Procurement; Director of Procurement and Administration; Director of Purchasing Operations; Director of Supply Management; Director, Generation Supply Chain; Executive Director; Group Manager; Manager; Manager Corporate Transportation/Investment Recovery; Manager of Logistics; Manager of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management; Manager Supply Chain; Manager, Procurement Operations; Manager, Sourcing and Contracts; Managing Director; Managing Supervisor Materials Management; Materials Management Operations Manager; Procurement Manager; Purchase Contract Manager; Purchasing Leader; Purchasing Manager; Regional Category Manager; Section Leader Central Stores; Sr. Manager Materials Management; Supply Chain Director; Supply Chain Management

Asset Recovery Coordinator; Coordinator/Buyer, Asset Management; Corporate Investment Recovery Technologist; Disposal Sales Representative; INV Materials Handler II; Inventory Services Sales Agent; Inventory Specialist; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Team Leader; IR Analyst; IR Site Contact; Lead Investment Recovery Specialist; Manager - Investment Recovery; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manager Resource Recovery; Material Specialist; Materials Management Tech & Sr Field Materials Coordinator; Procurement Agent - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist III; Purchases Manager; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Regional Manager; Sales Manager Investment Recovery; Sales Specialist; Section Manager; Senior Engineering Tech; Senior Investment Recovery Specialist; Senior Logistics Planning Analyst; Specialist; Sr. Investment Recovery Supervisor; Sr. Materials Analyst; Sr/Advanced Supply Chain Analyst; Stores Supersvisor; Supervisor; Surplus Asset Sales & Service; Team Leader - Asset Recovery

Manager; Team Lead - Operations Purchasing; Vice President; VP - Environmental Health and Safety; VP of Supply Operations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

44

Page 45: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection V: Utilities with Sales Less Than $5 Billion

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Level III - Investment Recovery Representative

Title

6

Salary Range

Minimum $43,113 $39,773 $25,251 $53,186 $40,000 5

Maximum $59,058 $50,878 $31,553 $61,443 $53,000 5

Number of employees in position 3 4 1 12 1 5

Average salary $50,956 $47,111 $29,910 $58,392 $50,000 5

Level IV - Associate Investment Recovery Representative (Clerical, Support Staff)

Title

5

Salary Range

Minimum $31,008 $32,698 4

Maximum $40,094 $38,488 4

Number of employees in position 2 1 1 2 1 5

Average salary $36,724 $39,543 $26,500 $47,950 $41,267 5

Paid by Employer Paid by Employee Joint

Contribution # companies

32 Company benefits:

Professional Support:

Professional License Fees 72.73% 9.09% 18.18% 11

Professional Society Dues 91.67% 0.00% 8.33% 12

Professional Publications 90.91% 9.09% 0.00% 11

Continuing Education 50.00% 0.00% 50.00% 12

Administration; Adminstration Specialist; Administrative Assistant; Administrative Support, Senior; Asset Recovery Coordinator II; Assistant Asset Recovery Agent; Associate Investment Recovery Specialist; Clerk; District Material Management Specialist; Investment Recovery Advisor; Invoicing Clerk; IR Representative; IR Systems Administrator; Marketing Coordinator; Material Handler; Material Management Support Specialist; Materials Assistant; Operations Specialist; Purchasing Assistant; Purchasing Rep; Senior Support; Specialist; Warehouse Specialist & Group Leader, Office Administration

Asset Recovery Agent; Asset Recovery Coordinator I; Associate Supply Chain Analyst; Asst. Manager - Investment Recovery; Business Support - Investment Recovery Specialist; Facilitator; INV Materials Handler I; Inventory Analyst; Inventory Services Senior Specialist; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Logistics Planning Analyst; Material Management Supervisor; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Resource Recovery Specialist; Storekeeper; Supervisor; Technical Clerk; Warehouse Supervisor

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

45

Page 46: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection VI: All Other Industries

Data Year: 2006Date Released: June 1, 2007

Belgacom SA LMC Properties, Inc.BellSouth Corporation MTA NYC TransitBierlein/DaimlerChrysler Nokia IncCaterpillar Inc. Ontario Lottery & Gaming CorporationCity of Calgary Phelps Dodge Mining Co.Dallas Area Rapid Transit State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDofasco Inc. Target CorporationGeneral Dynamics C4 Systems U.S. Postal ServiceGeneral Motors Corporation Verizon Communications Inc.International Paper Company Weyerhaeuser CompanyL.A. County Metro Transportation Authority

A.

Total 439,754,100,000$ Average 31,411,007,143$ Median 22,948,000,000$ Range 448,300,000$ to $88,144,000,000

The following companies provided data for this study:

Sales (in dollars):

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

46

Page 47: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection VI: All Other Industries

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Financial Information

1 Total cost benefit $22,551,042 $32,506,561 $300,000 $260,568,112 $8,000,000 19

2 Total cost benefit as a percent of total company sales 0.20% 0.11% 0.01% 0.36% 0.04% 14

3 Total cost benefit as a percent of sales attributed to business segments served 0.21% 0.11% 0.01% 0.36% 0.05% 12

4 Total cost benefit dollars to operating expense dollars 32 41 3 222 26 12

5 Total cost benefit dollars per transaction $27,038 $15,551 $1,314 $38,100 $15,208 12

6 Total cost benefit provided by each investment recovery employee $3,463,193 $3,182,320 $75,000 $12,408,005 $2,641,670 16

7 Total cost benefit provided by each exempt investment recovery employee $4,238,864 $5,819,920 $211,667 $12,408,005 $5,574,000 12

8 Investment recovery gross third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 44.83% 30.02% 5.36% 98.19% 18.31% 9

9 Net third-party sales as a percent of total cost benefit 32.97% 26.62% 3.24% 90.45% 18.05% 9

10 Gross sales dollars as a percent of total cost benefit 44.83% 68.49% 0.00% 100.00% 74.49% 19

Internal transfers/redeployment activity as a percent of total cost benefit 42.82% 21.87% 0.00% 100.00% 16.76% 19

Other cost avoidance as a percent of total cost benefit 16.46% 9.64% 0.00% 94.47% 0.00% 19

11AOperating expense per investment recovery employee including outsourcing expenses

$123,068 $142,907 $51,000 $423,240 $100,000 13

11BOperating expense per investment recovery employee excluding outsourcing expenses

n.r. $111,512 $51,000 $250,000 $77,196 13

12 Company IR employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense 81.72% 74.62% 17.88% 100.00% 82.34% 13

In-house IR contractors/consultants operating expense as a percent of total operating expense

9.07% 3.98% 0.00% 51.72% 0.00% 13

Temporary employees operating expense as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 5.65% 0.00% 53.57% 0.00% 13

Direct cost of outsourced IR services as a percent of total operating expense 10.12% 10.67% 0.00% 81.76% 0.00% 13

Other costs as a percent of total operating expense n.r. 5.08% 0.00% 22.48% 1.96% 13

13 Operating expense per transaction $1,464 $3,400 $41 $15,909 $658 10

14Average company sales for 2006 for the portion of the company for which IR services are provided

$17,594,440,000 $26,970,007,692 $448,300,000 $72,650,000,000 $20,000,000,000 13

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

47

Page 48: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection VI: All Other Industries

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

Investment Recovery Processes and Best Practices

15 Percent of companies that outsource some IR activities or services 76.47% 90.48% 21

Percent of companies that chose the following as one of the top five activities/ services outsourced in 2006

19

Appraisals 53.85% 36.84%

Auction 69.23% 68.42%

Bid or Negotiated Sales 46.15% 42.11%

Dismantling/Demolition 61.54% 52.63%

eAuction Sales 38.46% 47.37%

Equipment refurbishment 23.08% 21.05%

Internal Surplus redeployment 0.00% 15.79%

Internal staff augmentation 15.38% 10.53%

Offsite surplus storage/management 30.77% 10.53%

Recycling 61.54% 26.32%

Surplus identification/characterization 30.77% 10.53%

Used equipment searches 15.38% 26.32%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

16 Average number of transactions per IR employee 487 246 3 1,160 70 13

17 Internal transfers/redeployments as a percent of total transactions 53.68% 39.90% 0.00% 95.69% 20.83% 15

Third-party sales transactions as a percent of total transactions 50.18% 60.10% 4.31% 100.00% 79.17% 15

18Percent of companies that require the use of Investment Recovery to dispose of surplus assets

70.59% 61.90% 21

Percent of companies that encourage the use of Investment Recovery for disposal of surplus assets

n.r. 28.57%

Percent of companies that have no policy regarding the use of Investment Recovery n.r. 9.52%

19 Percent of companies active in trying to prevent the generation of surplus assets 56.25% 20.00% 20

Methods used:

20On a scale of 1 - 5, average rating of the following statements (1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree):

21

Senior executives understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.35 3.19

Operations managers understand the value of Investment Recovery 3.76 3.33

21 Percent of company's identified surplus assets managed 85.35% 75.25% 10.00% 100.00% 87.50% 20

22

Average number of days surplus assets are typically held or considered for redeployment before being marketed for external sale

84 44 14 200 30 20

When supported by policy, average number of days assets are held prior to being marketed for external sale

n.r. 47 14 90 30 10

All projects to look at surplus prior to starting procurement; Created IR clause to be included in purchasing contract to address total life cycle management of commodity; Early involvement with Project/Capital purchases; Leasing some capital assets; Moving equipment around to other internal projects; New software program being initiated to monitor and reduce redundancy; On-site vendor alliance contracts; On time delivery; Promoting buy back clauses; Provide trade-in clauses in purchase of new equipment; Return clauses in purchase contracts; Workshops with other organizations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

48

Page 49: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection VI: All Other Industries

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

Previous Report In Place In Place In Progress Still an

Opportunity# Companies

Reporting

23Percent of companies that reported implementation of the following Investment Recovery Association best practices:

Strong Visible Management Support 29.41% 47.62% 19.05% 33.33% 21

Surplus Asset Management Processes (identification, valuation, data base visibility, ssurplus matched with demand, etc.)

47.06% 57.89% 31.58% 10.53% 19

Regular Reporting of Metrics and Successes 58.82% 50.00% 35.00% 15.00% 20

Financial Incentives for Surplus Disposition 35.29% 36.84% 0.00% 63.16% 19

Surplus and Refurbished Assets Considered before Buying New 52.94% 26.32% 36.84% 36.84% 19

Early Involvement with Other Corporate Activities (capital projects, real estate sales, upgrades, demolition, divestitures, plant shut-downs, etc.)

35.29% 10.53% 68.42% 21.05% 19

Supplier Integration and Support (IR service provider contracts in place, equipment refurbishment programs, integrated processes, etc.)

52.94% 31.58% 21.05% 47.37% 19

Internet/intranet Utilization for Sales/Redeployment 70.59% 60.00% 30.00% 10.00% 20

Surplus Prevention and Return-to-Supplier processes 35.29% 35.00% 30.00% 35.00% 20

External Networking 47.06% 40.00% 30.00% 30.00% 20

Value Chain (Decision Hierarchy) Approach to Surplus Asset Disposition 58.82% 52.63% 15.79% 31.58% 19

24 Other IR processes considered by companies as good/best practices

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Electronic Commerce

25Percent of total sales/redeployment that resulted from the use of the Internet/intranet

External sales via Internet Posting (excluding eAuctions) 24.25% 45.50% 0.50% 90.00% 60.00% 11

External sales via eAuctions 21.50% 22.70% 2.00% 100.00% 10.00% 10

External sales via 3rd-party sellers or brokers (excluding eAuctions) 26.08% 44.42% 5.00% 98.00% 37.50% 12

Redeployment via intranet - percent of total transfers 46.63% 36.71% 5.00% 100.00% 10.00% 14

26Percent of companies with IR function responsible for locating and purchasing used machinery and equipment

n.r. 25.00% 20

Accountability and targets in place in personal performance contracts; Active with groups within our company to get the word out of the advantages of Investment Recovery; Activities integrated with Corporate Community Relations/donations and Environmental Services; Awareness sessions company wide; Computer reconditioning and donation practices to extend useful life, reduce waste and build relations with stakeholders; Developing a reclamation plan for base metal catalyst as opposed to land fill; Internal Computer Lab - Data security cleansing to insure private and confidential information is protected; Establishing a national electronic Asset Management System for reporting all asset action; Process in place to "loan" refrigeration equipment out to our stores for short term use during construction projects; Purchase of surplus assets as an option to purchasing new items; Recycling efforts for day-to-day items and also for new construction; Recycling of excess/obsolete computers through Goodwill Industries; Sharing of ideas; Storeroom inventory reclamation and recovery; The use of excess assets to alleviate offset obligation

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

49

Page 50: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection VI: All Other Industries

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean

Percent of Companies

# Companies Reporting

27Percent of companies that use the following types of information systems for internal redeployment and surplus sales:

21

Combined company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, web-based 29.41% 28.57%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales systems, both web-based

17.65% 9.52%

Separate company-wide redeployment and surplus sales system, only surplus sales system web-based

11.76% 4.76%

One internal deployment system, plus multiple surplus sales systems, some web-based

11.76% 9.52%

No web-based information systems - use posted spreadsheets, lists, faxes and/or email only

11.76% 28.57%

Other 17.65% 19.05%

List:

28Percent of companies that use the following web-based technologies to promote surplus sales:

21

Maintain own company surplus sales website 58.82% 42.86%

Actively submit company surplus sales website(s) to search engines for indexing 11.76% 14.29%

Maintain and use database or email list of prospective buyers 47.06% 76.19%

Rely solely on outside contract sales and auction firms 29.41% 23.81%

Rely on third-party websites for marketing of surplus 41.18% 19.05%

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Investment Recovery Staffing

29 Investment recovery employees as a percent of total company employees 0.05% 0.04% 0.00% 0.32% 0.02% 19

Exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees 72.34% 67.44% 0.00% 100.00% 75.00% 13

Non-exempt investment recovery employees as a percent of total IR employees

46.72% 25.82% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 13

In-house contractors as a percent of total IR employees 24.11% 6.74% 0.00% 73.33% 0.00% 13

30 Percent of FTE IR employees that have:

Bachelor's degree 37.78% 46.12% 0.00% 100.00% 45.00% 20

Master's degree 60.86% 16.28% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 20

Professional certification 44.73% 12.06% 0.00% 56.00% 0.00% 21

Less than 5 years of IR experience 60.55% 37.54% 0.00% 100.00% 25.00% 20

Between 5 and 15 years of IR experience 56.11% 42.73% 0.00% 100.00% 25.00% 21

More than 15 years of IR experience 47.75% 20.57% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 21

Broker Web based site; email and web based; engineering network conducts most activity; web company-wide redeployment system. Most surplus sales handled by the BU.

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

50

Page 51: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection VI: All Other Industries

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

31 Investment Recovery Salaries

Level I (Top Position) - Function Head, Investment Recovery

Title

13

Reports to (Title)

13

Salary Range

Minimum $71,333 $75,913 $33,000 $98,000 $80,000 10

Maximum $101,667 $113,389 $54,000 $155,000 $120,000 11

Average salary $82,731 $95,628 $57,000 $130,000 $97,000 10

Number of employees supervised

Direct 14 7 1 20 6 10

Indirect 14 33 2 150 9 9

Level II - Sr. Investment Recovery Representative

Title

11

Salary Range

Minimum $57,081 $63,989 $54,207 $75,000 $65,000 6

Maximum $82,667 $96,885 $65,275 $112,800 $95,000 7

Number of employees in position 4 2 1 3 2 9

Average salary $65,996 $82,295 $63,675 $98,000 $80,500 8

Asset Recovery Agent; Assistant Chief Operations Officer; Capital & Investment Recovery Manager; Capital Sales Co-Ordinator; Director; Director of Investment Recovery Operations; Inventory Manager; Investment Recovery Administrator; Investment Recovery Analyst; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Leader; Investment Recovery Manager; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Leader; Logistics Manager; Manager; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manater - Materials Resource Recovery; Manager - Supply Operations Support; Manager, Investment Recovery; Manager Investment Recovery & Reversed Logistics; Manager Supply Operations Support; Manager, Generation Inventory Management; Manager, National Supply Management Programs; Manager, Supply Chain; Market Supply Manager; Materials Management Team Lead; Materials Manager; Procurement Manager - Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist - Investment Recovery; Senior Buyer; Senior Manager - Procurement/Investment Recovery; Senior Purchases Manager; Sourcing Manager; Supervisor Investment Recovery; Supply Chain Representative

Chief Operations Officer; Customer Team Manager; Director; Director-Global Purchasing Machinery & Equipment; Director-Technical Procurement; Director Land Water & Asset Recovery; Director Material Distribution & Recovery Services; Director of Business Integration; Director of Procurement; Director of Procurement and Administration; Director of Purchasing Operations; Director of Supply Management; Director, Generation Supply Chain; Executive Director; Group Manager; Manager; Manager Corporate Transportation/Investment Recovery; Manager of Logistics; Manager of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management; Manager Supply Chain; Manager, Procurement Operations; Manager, Sourcing and Contracts; Managing Director; Managing Supervisor Materials Management; Materials Management Operations Manager; Procurement Manager; Purchase Contract Manager; Purchasing Leader; Purchasing Manager; Regional Category Manager; Section Leader Central Stores; Sr. Manager Materials Management; Supply Chain Director; Supply Chain Management

Asset Recovery Coordinator; Coordinator/Buyer, Asset Management; Corporate Investment Recovery Technologist; Disposal Sales Representative; INV Materials Handler II; Inventory Services Sales Agent; Inventory Specialist; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Team Leader; IR Analyst; IR Site Contact; Lead Investment Recovery Specialist; Manager - Investment Recovery; Manager - Asset Recovery; Manager Resource Recovery; Material Specialist; Materials Management Tech & Sr Field Materials Coordinator; Procurement Agent -Resource Recovery; Procurement Specialist III; Purchases Manager; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Regional Manager; Sales Manager Investment Recovery; Sales Specialist; Section Manager; Senior Engineering Tech; Senior Investment Recovery Specialist; Senior Logistics Planning Analyst; Specialist; Sr. Investment Recovery Supervisor; Sr. Materials Analyst; Sr/Advanced Supply Chain Analyst; Stores Supersvisor; Supervisor; Surplus Asset Sales & Service; Team Leader - Asset Recovery

Manager; Team Lead - Operations Purchasing; Vice President; VP - Environmental Health and Safety; VP of Supply Operations

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

51

Page 52: CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance ...invrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/2007... · CAPS Research Investment Recovery 2007 Performance Benchmarking Report

CAPS ResearchInvestment Recovery

2007 Performance Benchmarking ReportSection VI: All Other Industries

Data Year: 2006Release Date: June 1, 2007

# Benchmarks Previous Report Mean Current Mean Minimum Maximum Median # Companies

Reporting

Level III - Investment Recovery Representative

Title

6

Salary Range

Minimum $44,253 $45,224 $38,400 $49,200 $45,000 5

Maximum $74,981 $80,338 $46,100 $102,000 $83,550 6

Number of employees in position 4 5 1 13 4 6

Average salary $56,700 $62,053 $40,320 $72,000 $65,000 6

Level IV - Associate Investment Recovery Representative (Clerical, Support Staff)

Title

7

Salary Range

Minimum $35,733 $37,687 $35,000 $40,000 $38,000 5

Maximum $51,833 $60,554 $50,000 $80,000 $56,750 6

Number of employees in position 20 17 1 85 7 7

Average salary $39,825 $46,217 $35,000 $55,000 $46,650 6

Paid by Employer Paid by Employee Joint

Contribution # companies

32 Company benefits:

Professional Support:

Professional License Fees 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13

Professional Society Dues 94.44% 5.56% 0.00% 18

Professional Publications 88.24% 5.88% 0.00% 17

Continuing Education 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20

Administration; Adminstration Specialist; Administrative Assistant; Administrative Support, Senior; Asset Recovery Coordinator II; Assistant Asset Recovery Agent; Associate Investment Recovery Specialist; Clerk; District Material Management Specialist; Investment Recovery Advisor; Invoicing Clerk; IR Representative; IR Systems Administrator; Marketing Coordinator; Material Handler; Material Management Support Specialist; Materials Assistant; Operations Specialist; Purchasing Assistant; Purchasing Rep; Senior Support; Specialist; Warehouse Specialist & Group Leader, Office Administration

Asset Recovery Agent; Asset Recovery Coordinator I; Associate Supply Chain Analyst; Asst. Manager - Investment Recovery; Business Support - Investment Recovery Specialist; Facilitator; INV Materials Handler I; Inventory Analyst; Inventory Services Senior Specialist; Investment Recovery Coordinator; Investment Recovery Specialist; Investment Recovery Supervisor; Logistics Planning Analyst; Material Management Supervisor; Purchasing & Supply Management Specialist; Resource Recovery Specialist; Storekeeper; Supervisor; Technical Clerk; Warehouse Supervisor

Copyright © 2007 Institute for Supply Management™ and Arizona State University.All rights reserved.

52