Upload
rimoniba
View
18
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The term Paper tries to visualize “Capital Structure Decisions” and represent the facts that include features of Capital structure, determinants of capital structure, patterns or forms of capital structure, types and theories of capital structure, theory of optimal capital structure, risk associated with capital structure, external assessment of capital structure and some assumption related to capital structure.
Citation preview
CCHAPTERHAPTER: 1.00: 1.00OORIENTATIONRIENTATION OFOF T THEHE T TERMERM
PPAPERAPER
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The term Paper tries to visualize “Capital Structure Decisions” and
represent the facts that include features of Capital structure,
determinants of capital structure, patterns or forms of capital
structure, types and theories of capital structure, theory of optimal
capital structure, risk associated with capital structure, external
assessment of capital structure and some assumption related to
capital structure.
The following sections in this chapter represent an orientation of the
Term Paper.
1.2 ORIGIN OF THE TERM PAPER
The students pursuing the MBA program at the Institute of Business
Administration, University of Rajshahi has prepared the Term Paper,
“Capital Structure Decisions” to fulfill the partial requirement of the
course, Financial Management (C-620).
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE TERM PAPER
The objectives of the Term Paper are portrayed below:
1.3.1 BROAD OBJECTIVE
To determine features of Capital structure,
To know about the determinants of capital structure
To evaluate the patterns or forms of capital structure
To identify the types and theories of capital structure
To analyze the theory of optimal capital structure
To determine the risk associated with capital structure
“Capital Structure Decisions” 2
To have an overview about external assessment of capital
structure
To know about the assumption related to capital structure.
1.3.2 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE
Have the knowledge about how the capital structure
decisions.
1.4 SCOPE OF THE TERM PAPER
“Capital structure decisions” has been covered in this Term Paper.
Within a short time frame, the paper came to its existence with the
following highlighted facts:
Features of Capital structure,
Determinants of capital structure
Patterns or forms of capital structure
Types and theories of capital structure
Theory of optimal capital structure
Risk associated with capital structure
External assessment of capital structure
Assumption related to capital structure.
The Term paper provides itself as the conspicuous view of the capital
structure and open up the facts that leads to making decisions.
1.5 METHODOLOGY
The ultimate goal of the Term Paper is to discover the facts concerned
with capital structure decisions. So a well-planned research
methodology has been formulated to get a conspicuous view. In this
section, research processes that been followed while prepared the
Term Paper is been listed:
“Capital Structure Decisions” 3
1.5.1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION:
Books on Financial Management
Articles published on capital structure both in the country
and all across the world
Search out different websites for data collection related to
capital structure decisions.
Lecture notes of the course Financial Management
1.5.2 JUSTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION:
All the information have been examined and analyzed to
evaluate their justification.
Finally, input the appropriate information into the Term Paper.
1.6 LIMITATIONS
Limitations we had to face on preparing the Term Paper are portrayed
below:
In-experience on preparing this sort of Term Paper
In-available information related to the Term Paper
Improper knowledge on technological know how.
Language proficiency
Time constraints
“Capital Structure Decisions” 4
CCHAPTERHAPTER: 2.00: 2.00OOVERVIEWVERVIEW OFOF F FINANCIALINANCIAL
MMANAGEMENTANAGEMENT
“Capital Structure Decisions” 5
2.1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Finance can be defined as the art and science of managing
money. Finance is concerned with the process, institutions,
markets, and instruments involved in the transfer of money
among individuals, businesses, and governments.
On the other hand Financial Management is concerned with the
planning and controlling of resources. It is defined by the
functions of financial managers. Three (3) things should be
managed,
Investment Decision
Financing Decision
Managing Resources
Financial Services is the area of finance concerned with the
design and delivery of advice and financial products to
“Capital Structure Decisions” 6
individuals, businesses, and government. Career opportunities
include banking, personal financial planning, investments, real
estate, and insurance.
2.2 GOAL OF THE FIRM
Actions of the financial manager should be taken to achieve the
objectives of the firm’s owners, its stockholders. Thus financial
managers need to know what the objectives of the firm’s are.
Profit maximization
Wealth maximization
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION
To achieve this goal, the financial manager would take only those
actions that were expected to make major contribution to the firm’s
overall profits. Corporations commonly measure profits in terms of
earning per share (EPS). The objections of profit maximization are,
The concept is vague
It ignores time dimension of financial decision
It ignores the risk dimension of financial decision
Profit do not necessarily result in cash flows
available to the stockholders
WEALTH MAXIMIZATION
The goal of the firm, and therefore of all managers and employees is
to maximize the wealth of the owners for whom it is being operated.
The wealth of corporate owners is measured by the share price of the
stock. Maximizing shareholder wealth properly considers cash flows,
the timing of these cash flows, and the risk of these cash flows.
2.3 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Financial institutions serve as intermediaries by channeling the
savings of individuals, business and governments into loan or
investments. The key suppliers and demanders of funds are
individuals, businesses, and governments. In general, individuals are
“Capital Structure Decisions” 7
net suppliers of funds, while businesses and governments are net
demanders of funds.
Firms have ongoing needs of funds. They can obtain funds through the
following ways,
Financial Institutions
Financial Market
Private Placement
2.4 FINANCIAL MARKETS
Financial markets are organized forums in which the suppliers and
demanders of various types of funds can make transaction. The two
key financial markets are the money market and the capital market
Transactions in short term marketable securities take place in the
money market while transactions in long-term securities take place in
the capital market. Whether subsequently traded in the money or
capital market, securities are first issued through the primary market.
The primary market is the only one in which a corporation or
government is directly involved in and receives the proceeds from the
transaction.
Once issued, securities then trade on the secondary markets such as
the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ.
THE MONEY MARKET
The money market exists as a result of the interaction between the
suppliers and demanders of short-term funds (those having a maturity
of a year or less). Most money market transactions are made in
marketable securities which are short-term debt instruments such as
“Capital Structure Decisions” 8
T-bills and commercial paper. Money market transactions can be
executed directly or through an intermediary.
THE CAPITAL MARKET
The capital market is a market that enables suppliers and demanders
of long-term funds to make transactions. The key capital market
securities are bonds (long-term debt) and both common and preferred
stock (equity). Bonds are long-term debt instruments used by
businesses and government to raise large sums of money or capital.
Common stocks are units of ownership interest or equity in a
corporation.
The following figure will show how funds flow between financial
institutions and financial markets,
2.5 BASIC FORMS OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATION
“Capital Structure Decisions” 9
Flow of funds for financial institutions and markets
Three most common legal forms of business organizations are the sole
proprietorship, the partnership and the corporation. Other specialized
forms of business organization also exist. Sole proprietorship is the
most numerous. However, corporations are overwhelmingly dominant
with respect to business receipts and net profits. The advantages and
disadvantages of different types of business are as follows
SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
A sole proprietorship is a business own by one person who operates it
for his or her own profit. About 75% of all business farms are sole
proprietorships. The strengths and weaknesses are as follows,
STRENGTHS:• Low organizational cost• Income taxed once as personal income
• Independence• Secrecy• Ease of dissolution
WEAKNESSES:• Unlimited liability• Limited funding• Proprietor must be all• Difficult to develop staff career opportunities
• Lack of continuity on death of proprietor
PARTNERSHIP
A partnership consists of two or more owners doing business togather
for profit. Partnerships account for about 10% of all businesses and
they are typically larger that sole proprietorships. Finance, Insurance
and Real estate firms are the most common types of partnerships. The
written contract used to formally establish a business partnership.
STRENGTHS:• Improved funding sources• Increased managerial talent• Income split by partnership contract, taxed as personal income
WEAKNESSES:• Unlimited liability to all partners• Partnership dissolved upon death of partner
• Difficult to liquidate or transfer ownership
“Capital Structure Decisions” 10
CORPORATION
A corporation is an artificial being created by law. Often called a
“legal entity”, a corporation has the powers of an individual in that it
sue and be sued, make and be party to contracts, and acquire property
in it own name. Although only about 15% of all businesses are
incorporated, the corporation is the dominant form of business
organizations in term of recipts and profits. The strengths and
weakness are as follows,
STRENGTHS:• Owners’ liability limited• Large capitalization possible, greater funding
• Ownership readily transferable• Indefinite life• Professional management
WEAKNESSES:• Higher tax rates• Expensive organization• Greater government regulation
• When publicly traded, lacks secrecy
“Capital Structure Decisions” 11
CCHAPTERHAPTER: 3.00: 3.00
CCAPITALAPITAL S STRUCTURETRUCTURE D DECISIONSECISIONS
“Capital Structure Decisions” 12
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Capital Structure is one of the most complex areas of financial
decision making because of its interrelationship with other
financial decision variables. Poor capital structure decisions can
result in a high cost of capital thereby lowering the NPVs of
projects and making more of them unacceptable. In practical
sense, a firm can probably more readily increase its value by
improving quality and reducing costs than by fine tuning its
capital structure. Effective capital structure decision can lower
the cost of capital, resulting in higher NPVs and more acceptable
projects, and thereby increasing the value of the firm.
A firm’s major decision is its financing decisions which are
analyzed in the theory of corporate capital structure and based
on the model developed by Dodd (1986), capital structure is
determined mainly by three agency costs variables- agency-
equity, agency-debt & bankruptcy risk and other potential
variables such as growth rate, profitability and operating
leverage.
“Capital Structure Decisions” 13
The firm’s capital structure should result from balancing the
costs of certain relationships between firm related groups.
Sometime agent does not act in line with the set objectives of the
principal.
Shareholders are the owner of the firm. If shareholders
value increases they will be benefited and vice-versa.
Shareholders value maximization depends on managers
activities. But as a rational being, managers try to
maximize their own interest. As a result agency and equity
cost arises which tend to discourage the use of equity.
Debt holders have no voice on management issue.
Managers are accountable only to the firm. So, they are
trying to maximize the wealth of shareholders not debt
holders. So, conflict arises between managers and debt
holders. There is an agency-debt cost which discourages
the issuance of debt.
There is a possibility of bankruptcy if the firm taking more
debt capital. Because the greater the firms debt capital,
higher the possibility of default on interest and capital
repayment.
Three other potential determinants of capital structure are
also included in the model developed by Dodd. Firms
growing at higher rates should have higher debt ratios than
firms with lower growth rates. The relationship between
debt ratios and growth rate is expected to be positive.
Firms with higher profitability ratio may be expected to
have more equity than firms with lower ratios.
Management of companies with high operating leverage
may use lower levels of financial leverage i.e, debt.
“Capital Structure Decisions” 14
3.2 CAPITAL STRUCTURES
Capital structure is the manner in which a firm’s assets are
financed; that is, the right-hand side of the balance sheet.
Capital structure is normally expressed as the percentage of
each type of capital used by the firm--debt, preferred stock, and
common equity.
Combination of capital is called capital structure. The firm may
use only equity, or only debt, or a combination of equity and
debt, or a combination of equity, debt, preference shares or may
use other similar combinations.
3.3 FEATURES OF AN APPROPRIATE CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Capital structure is that level of debt-equity proportion where
the market value per share is maximum and the cost of capital is
minimum.
Appropriate capital structure should have the following features
Profitability / Return Solvency / Risk Flexibility Conservation / Capacity Control
3.4 DETERMINANTS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Formation of Capital structure depends on many factors which
are normally called the determinants of Capital structure. The
determinants based on which capital structure were formed are
listed below,
Seasonal Variations
“Capital Structure Decisions” 15
Tax benefit of Debt
Flexibility
Control
Industry Leverage Ratios
Agency Costs
Industry Life Cycle
Degree of Competition
Company Characteristics
Requirements of Investors
Timing of Public Issue
Legal Requirements
3.5 PATTERNS / FORMS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Following are the forms of capital structure:
Complete equity share capital;
Different proportions of equity and preference share
capital;
Different proportions of equity and debenture (debt)
capital and
Different proportions of equity, preference and
debenture (debt) capital.
3.6 CAPITAL STRUCTURE THEORY
“Capital Structure Decisions” 16
Capital structure theory provides some insights into the value of
debt versus equity financing. Modern capital structure theory
began in 1958, when Modigliani and Miller proved, under a very
restrictive set of assumptions, that a firm’s value is unaffected by
its capital structure. There are 4 theories:
NI approach (net income approach)
NOI approach (net operating income approach)
MM approach (Modigliani-Millar Approach)
Traditional approach
NI APPROACH (NET INCOME APPROACH)
When you raise debt, leverage will increase. The overall values
of the firm will increase. Debt will have lower cost, so overall
cost of capital will reduce (it is better if the cost of capital
reduces).
V = S+ D
Where,
V = value of the firm, S = equity, D = debt
An increase in leverage will increase the value of the firm, it will
raise EPS, it will raise the market price of the shares and it will
reduce weighted average cost of capital, thus leverage is always
beneficial.
“Capital Structure Decisions” 17
NOI APPROACH (NET OPERATING INCOME APPROACH)
Capital structure decision is irrelevant. If you raise debt, the cost
of equity will increase. The overall cost of capital will remain
constant in spite of leverage. Thus there is no advantage of
raising debt. As we raise the debt, the cost of equity increases in
the same proportion. The market discounts the firm, which is
leveraged. Thus capital structure decision has no relevance.
According to NOI approach the value of the firm and the
weighted average cost of capital are independent of the firm’s
capital structure. In the absence of taxes, an individual holding
all the debt and equity securities will receive the same cash
flows regardless of the capital structure and therefore, value of
the company is the same.
MM APPROACH WITHOUT TAX
The firm’s value is independent of its capital structure. With
personal leverage, shareholders can receive exactly the same
return, with the same risk, from a levered firm and an un-levered
firm. Thus, they will sell shares of the over-priced firm and buy
shares of the under-priced firm until the two values equate. This
is called arbitrage.
The cost of equity for a levered firm equals the constant overall
cost of capital plus a risk premium that equals the spread
between the overall cost of capital and the cost of debt
multiplied by the firm’s debt-equity ratio. For financial leverage
to be irrelevant, the overall cost of capital must remain constant,
“Capital Structure Decisions” 18
regardless of the amount of debt employed. This implies that the
cost of equity must rise as financial risk increases.
MM APPROACH WITH TAX
Under current laws in most countries, debt has an important
advantage over equity: interest payments on debt are tax
deductible, whereas dividend payments and retained earnings
are not. Investors in a levered firm receive in the aggregate the
un-levered cash flow plus an amount equal to the tax deduction
on interest. Capitalizing the first component of cash flow at the
all-equity rate and the second at the cost of debt shows that the
value of the levered firm is equal to the value of the un-levered
firm plus the interest tax shield which is tax rate times the debt
(if the shield is fully usable).
It is assumed that the firm will borrow the same amount of debt
in perpetuity and will always be able to use the tax shield. Also,
it ignores bankruptcy and agency costs.
TRADITIONAL APPROACH
It says that with the use of debt, the overall cost of capital comes
down up to some extent and thereafter the overall cost of capital
increases. Thus there is an ideal point, up to which the overall
“Capital Structure Decisions” 19
cost of capital will decrease with the help of increase in debt,
beyond which the use of debt is detrimental to the company.
3.7 THEORY OF OPTIMAL CAPITAL STRUCTURE
This theory states that we can have an optimum capital structure
– as we raise the debt, we can raise the value of the firm to some
extent. Thus level of debt can be increased up to some level.
That level is the ideal capital structure. Ultimate objective of
Finance manager is to raise the value of the firm and raise the
wealth – which is possible by an ideal capital structure.
3.8 TYPES OF CAPITAL
All of the items on the right-hand side of the firm’s balance
sheet, excluding current liabilities, are sources of capital. The
following simplified balance sheet illustrates the basic
breakdown of total capital into its two components, debt capital
and equity capital.
Balance Sheet
“Capital Structure Decisions” 20
Current LiabilitiesLong term
Assets: Stockholder’s
equity Preferred stock Common stock
equity
Debt Capital
Equity Capital
Total Capital
3.9 DESIGN COST OF CAPITAL
Capital of a firm can be designed by considering the following
facts
It should minimize cost of capital
It should reduce risks
It should give required flexibility
It should provide required control to the owners
It should enable the company to have adequate
finance.
3.10 RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH CAPITAL STRUCTURE DECISIONS
Meaning of risk is variability in income. Business risk is the
situation, when the EBIT may vary due to change in capital
structure. It is influenced by the ratio of fixed cost in total cost. If
the ratio of fixed cost is higher, business risk is higher. Financial
risk is the variability in EPS due to change in capital structure. It
is caused due to leverage. If leverage is more, variability will be
more and thus financial risk will be more.
BUSINESS RISK
“Capital Structure Decisions” 21
Business risk is the risk inherent in the operations of the firm,
prior to the financing decision. Thus, business risk is the
uncertainty inherent in a total risk sense, future operating
income, or earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT). Business
risk is caused by many factors. Two of the most important are
sales variability and operating leverage.
FINANCIAL RISK
Financial risk is the risk added by the use of debt financing. Debt
financing increases the variability of earnings before taxes (but
after interest); thus, along with business risk, it contributes to
the uncertainty of net income and earnings per share. Business
risk plus financial risk equals total corporate risk.
3.11 USE OF FINANCIAL LEVERAGE IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE
The use of the fixed-charges sources of funds, such as debt and
preference capital along with the owners’ equity in the capital
structure, is described as financial leverage or gearing or trading
on equity.
Operating leverage is the extent to which fixed costs are used in
a firm’s operations. If a high percentage of a firm’s total costs
are fixed costs, then the firm is said to have a high degree of
operating leverage. Operating leverage is a measure of one
element of business risk, but does not include the second major
element, sales variability.
Financial leverage is the extent to which fixed-income securities
(debt and preferred stock) are used in a firm’s capital structure.
If a high percentage of a firm’s capital structure is in the form of
“Capital Structure Decisions” 22
debt and preferred stock, then the firm is said to have a high
degree of financial leverage.
The financial leverage employed by a company is intended to
earn more return on the fixed-charge funds than their costs. The
surplus (or deficit) will increase (or decrease) the return on the
owners’ equity. The rate of return on the owners’ equity is
levered above or below the rate of return on total assets.
Financial Leverage can be measured by
Debt ratio,
Debt-equity ratio and
Interest coverage.
The first two measures of financial leverage can be expressed
either in terms of book values or market values. These two
measures are also known as measures of capital gearing.
The third measure of financial leverage, commonly known as
coverage ratio. The reciprocal of interest coverage is a measure
of the firm’s income gearing
“Capital Structure Decisions” 23
3.12 ASSUMPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE THEORIES
Assumptions related to capital structure are as follows
There are only two sources of funds i.e.: debt and equity.
The total assets of the company are given and do no
change.
The total financing remains constant. The firm can change
the degree of leverage either by selling the shares and
retiring debt or by issuing debt and redeeming equity.
Operating profits (EBIT) are not expected to grow.
All the investors are assumed to have the same expectation
about the future profits.
Business risk is constant over time and assumed to be
independent of its capital structure and financial risk.
Corporate tax does not exist.
The company has infinite life.
Dividend payout ratio = 100%.
“Capital Structure Decisions” 24
3.13 EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Financial leverage results from the use of fixed-cost financing,
such as debt and preferred stock, to magnify return and risk. The
amount of leverage in the firm’s capital structure can affect its
value by affecting return and risk. Those outside the firm can
make a rough assessment of capital structure by using measures
found in the firm’s financial statements
Measures of the firm’s ability to meet contractual payments
associated with debt include the times interest earned ratio and
the fixed- payment coverage ratio. These ratios provide indirect
information on financial leverage.
“Capital Structure Decisions” 25
3.14 FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN MAKING CAPITAL STRUCTURE DECISIONS
Concern Factor DescriptionBusiness
riskRevenue stability
Firms that have stable and
predictable
revenues can more safely undertake
highly
leveraged capital structures than
can firms
with volatile patterns of sales
revenue. Firms
with growing sales tend to benefit
from
added debt; they can reap the
positive
benefits of financial leverage, which
magnifies the effect of these
increase.
Cash flow When considering a new capital
structure,
the firm must focus on its ability to
generate
the cash flows necessary to meet
obligations. Cash forecasts
“Capital Structure Decisions” 26
reflecting and
ability to service debts and
preferred stock
must support any shift in capital
structure.
Agency cost
Contractual obligation
A firm may be contractually
constrained
with respect to the type of funds
that it can
raise. Contractual constraints on
the sale of
additional stock ,as well as on the
ability to
distributes dividends on stock might
also
exist
Management Preferences
A firm will impose an internal
constraint on
the use of debt to limits its risk
exposure to
a level deemed acceptable to
management.
Control A management group concerned
about
control may prefer to issue debt
rather than
(voting) common stock. Generally,
in
closely held firms or firms
threatened by
takeover does control become a
“Capital Structure Decisions” 27
major
concerned in the capital structure
decision.
Asymmetric
information
External risk assessment
The. The firm’s ability to raise funds
quickly and at favorable rates
depends on the external risk
assessments of lenders and bond
rates. The firm must consider the
impact of capital structure decisions
both on share value and on
published financial statements from
which lenders and bond raters.
Timing At the time when interest rates are
low, debt financing might be more
attractive; when interest rates high,
the sales of stock may be more
appealing.
“Capital Structure Decisions” 28
CCHAPTERHAPTER: 4.00: 4.00FFINDINGSINDINGS ANDAND CCONCLUSIONONCLUSION
“Capital Structure Decisions” 29
4.1 FINDINGS
Capital Structure makes a difference to the organizations overall
retained earning. Such measures have consistently promoted
business performance criteria such as profit, sales and
productivity.
The overall findings from this term paper are listed below,
Capital structure has a substantial impact on overall
profitability
Leverage has also some impact on capital structure
decision
When making capital structure decision firm consider
different types of risks
Tax rate makes a substantial impact over the profitability
of the farm when debt capital were use
If debt, common equity and preferred equity were used in
capital structure the firms profitably will increase
“Capital Structure Decisions” 30
4.2 CONCLUSION
This paper uses a novel data set to explore the capital structure
decisions that firms make in their operations. In the vast
majority of cases, this is when the firms in question still are
being incubated in their founders’ homes or garages, before
outside employees have joined the firm in any numbers, and
certainly well before the firms in question would be attractive to
the types of funding sources that are the focus of most
discussions of early stage financing. Despite these firms being at
the very beginning of life, they rely to a surprising degree on
outside capital. Roughly 80 percent to 90 percent of most firms’
startup capital is made up in equal parts of owner equity and
bank debt. While a large fraction of this bank debt is owed by the
founder, rather than the firm, the fact that the debt is financed
through arm’s length relationships, and not through family and
“Capital Structure Decisions” 31
friends networks, is worthy of further research. To be sure, our
findings underscore the importance of liquid credit markets for
the formation and success of young firms. If firms hold the key to
growth in economies, then surely economic growth hinges
critically on the smooth functioning of credit markets that enable
young firms to be formed, to grow, and to succeed.
REFERENCES
BOOKS
Lawrence J. Gitman (2009-2010) “Principles of Managerial Finance, 12 th Edition”,
Prentice-Hall India
WEBSITES
Md. Tauhidul Alam-10: 30 AM (25-06-09)
HTTP://WWW.ESNIPS.COM
“Capital Structure Decisions” 32
OTHER
Lecture Notes of Financial Management
“Capital Structure Decisions” 33