Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
KGS
INTEGRITY FIRST
“In the business world, the rear view mirror is
always clearer than the windshield.”
Warren Buffett
S. No. Topic
1. Capital Gains Scheme under Income Tax Act – 1961
2. Amendments in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
3. GST Audit
Index
INDEX
This article aims to: Definition of Short term/Long term Capital Asset
How to calculate short term capital gains
Rates of tax on Short– Term Capital Gains
Rates of tax on Long – Term Capital Gains
Exemptions from Capital Gains
Capital Gains Scheme
under Income Tax Act, 1961
CAPITAL GAINS SCHEME UNDER INCOME TAX ACT,1961
Capital Gain
Any profit or gain that arises from the transfer of a ‘capital asset’ is a capital gain. This gain or
profit is considered as income and hence charged to tax in the year in which the transfer of the
capital asset takes place. This is called capital gains tax, which can be short-term or long-term.
As per Section 2(47)of Income-tax Act 1961, the term ‘transfer’ has been defined as Transfer in
relation to a capital asset whichincludes :
(i) the sale, exchange or relinquishment of the asset; or
(ii) the extinguishment of any rights therein; or
(iii) the compulsory acquisition thereof under any law; or
(iv) in a case where the asset is converted by the owner thereof into, or is treated by him
as stock-in-trade of a business carried on by him, such conversion or treatment; or
(v) any transaction involving the allowing of the possession of any immovable property
to be taken or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section
53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882; or
(vi) any transaction (whether by way of becoming a member of, a acquiring shares in, a
co-operative society, company or other association of persons or by way of any agreement or any arrangement or in any other manner whatsoever) which has the effect of transferring
or enabling the enjoyment of, any immovable property.
(vii) maturity or redemption of a zero coupon bond.
Capital gains are not applicable when an asset is inherited . However, if this asset is sold by the
person who inherits it, capital gains tax will be applicable. The Income Tax Act has specifically
exempted assets received as gifts or inheritance or will from the application of any capital gain tax
at the time of gift or inheritance.
Capital Asset
Capital asset is defined to include:
a) Any kind of property held by an assessee, whether or not connected with business or profession
of the assessee.
b) Any securities held by a FII which has invested in such securities in accordance with the
regulations made under the SEBI Act, 1992.
However, the following items are excluded from the definition of "capital asset":
Any stock-in-trade, consumable stores, or raw materials held by a person for the purpose of
his business or profession.
Personal effects of a person, that is to say, movable property including wearing apparels
and furniture held for personal use, by a person or for use by any member of his family
dependent on him. However, jewellery, archaeological collections, drawings, paintings,
sculptures, or any work of art are not treated as personal effects and, hence, are included in
the definition of capital assets.
Agricultural Land in India, not being a land situated:
Within jurisdiction of municipality, notified area committee, town area committee,
cantonment board and which has a population of not less than 10,000;
Within range of following distance measured aerially from the local limits of any municipality or cantonment board:
not being more than 2 KMs, if population of such area is more than 10,000 but not
exceeding 1 lakh; not being more than 6 KMs, if population of such area is more than 1 lakh but not
exceeding 10 lakhs; or
not being more than 8 KMs, if population of such area is more than 10 lakhs. Population is to be considered according to the figures of last preceding census of which
relevant figures have been published before the first day of the year.
6½% Gold Bonds, 1977 or 7% Gold Bonds, 1980 or National Defence Gold Bonds, 1980
issued by the Central Government.
Special Bearer Bonds, 1991, issued by the Central Government.
Gold Deposit Bonds issued under Gold Deposit Scheme, 1999.
Definition of Short Term/Long Term Capital Asset
As per section 2(42A), short-term capital asset means a capital asset held by an assessee for not
more than 36 months immediately preceding the date of its transfer.
As per section 2(29A), long-term capital asset means a capital asset which is not a short-term
capital asset.Thus, a capital asset held by an assessee for more than 36 months immediately
preceding the date of its transfer is a long-term capital asset.
Exceptions:A security (other than a unit) listed in a recognized stock exchange, or a unit of an
equity-oriented fund or a unit of the Unit Trust of India or a Zero-Coupon Bond will, however, be
considered as a long-term capital asset if the same is held for more than 12 months immediately preceding the date of its transfer.
Further, a share of a company (not being a share listed in a recognized stock exchange in India) or an immovable property, being land or building or both would be treated as a short-term capital asset
if it was held by an assessee for not more than 24 months immediately preceding the date of its
transfer.
Thus, the period of holding of unlisted shares or an immovable property, being land or building or
both, for being treated as a long-term capital asset would be “more than 24 months” instead of
“more than 36 months”.
Period of holding: A Summary
Nature Period
•Security(otherthanunit)listedinarecognizedstockexchange
•Unitofequity-oriented fund/unitofUTI •ZeroCouponbond
STCA, if held for ≤ 12 month
LTCA, if held for > 12 months
•Unlisted shares
•Land or building or both
STCA, if held for ≤ 24 month
LTCA, if held for > 24 months
•Unit of debt-oriented fund •Unlisted securities other than shares
•Other capital assets
STCA, if held for ≤ 36 month LTCA, if held for > 36 months
How to Calculate Short-Term Capital Gains
Proforma for computation of income under the head “Capital Gains”
Particulars Amt (₹) Amt
(₹)
In case
of a
Short-
term
Capital
asset
Full value of Consideration received or accruing as a result of
transfer
Less: Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection
with such transfer (for e.g., brokerage on sale)
(Note: Deduction on account of STT paid will not be allowed)
Net Sale Consideration
Less: Cost of Acquisition (COA)
Cost of Improvement (COI)
Short Term Capital Gain (STCG)
Short Term Capital Gain chargeable to Tax
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
Particulars Amt (₹) Amt (₹)
In case
of a
Long-
term
Capital
asset
Full value of consideration received or accruing as a result of
transfer
Less: Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection
with such transfer (for e.g., brokerage on sale)
(Note: Deduction on account of SIT paid will not be allowed)
Net Sale Consideration
Less: Indexed Cost of Acquisition (ICOA)
Cost of acquisition X CII for the year in which the asset
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
is transferred
CII for the year in which the asset was first held by the assessee
or P.Y 2001-02, whichever is later
Note: (Benefit of indexation will, however, not be available in
respect of long-term capital gains from transfer of bonds or
debentures other than capital indexed bonds issued by the
Government and sovereign gold bonds issued by RBI and
inrespect of long-term capital gains chargeable to tax under
section 112A)
Less: Indexed cost of improvement (ICOI)
Cost of improvement X CII for the year in which the asset
is transferred
CII for the year in which the improvement took place
Long -term capital gains (LTCG)
Less: Exemption under sections 54/54B/54D/54EC/54EE/54F
Long Term Capital Gains chargeable to tax
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
(*CII – Cost Inflation Index)
Rate of Tax on Short-term Capital Gains
Section Rate of Tax
111A Short-term Capital gains arising on transfer of listed equity shares, units of
equity-oriented fund and unit of business trust- 15%, if STT has been paid on such
sale.
Short-term capital gains arising from transaction undertaken in foreign currency
on a recognized stock exchange located in an International Financial Services
Centre (IFSC) would be taxable at a concessional rate of 15% even though STT is not paid in respect of such transaction.
Note - Short-term capital gains arising on transfer of other Short-term Capital Assets would be
chargeable at normal rates of tax.
Rates of tax on Long-Term Capital Gains
Section Rate of Tax
112A •Tax @10% on long-term capital gains exceeding ₹1,00,000 on the transfer of following long-term capital assets: -
-listed equity shares, if STT has been paid on acquisition andtransfer of such shares
-units of equity-oriented fund and unit of business trust1, if STT has been paid ontransfer of such units
•If such transaction undertaken on a recognized stock exchange located in an
International Financial Services Centre (IFSC),LTCG would be taxable at a
concessional rate of 10% where the consideration for transfer is received or receivable in foreign currency, even though STT is not paid in respect of such
transaction.
•Benefit of indexation and currency fluctuation would not be available.
112 Long-term capital asset Rate of tax
Unlisted securities, or shares of
a closely held company Non-corporate non-resident/ foreign
company - 10% without the benefit of indexation and currency fluctuation.
Other Assessees - 20%, with indexation benefit.
Listed securities other than a
unit) or a zero-coupon bond
-10%, without the benefit of indexation or
-20%, availing the benefit of indexation whichever is more beneficial to the assessee
Other Assets -20%
Exemptions from Capital Gains
It is important for taxpayers who are planning to purchase or sell a capital asset to pay special
attention to tax planning. Income taxpayers who know the various provisions of Income Tax and
related Capital Gains Exemptions can immensely benefit from reducing the incidence of tax. The
duration of holding a capital asset and the various expenses and other deductions to be claimed for arriving at the final quantum of taxable capital gains has a direct bearing on the amount of income tax
to be paid on capital gains in respect of a transfer of the capital assets. Hence, it’s important for all
taxpayers to know about the following capital gains exemptions while purchasing or selling capital
assets.
Exemption of Capital Gain(Section 54 to 54F)
S. No. Particulars Section 54 Section 54B Section 54D Section
54EC
Section
54EE
Section 54F
1 Eligible Assessee Individual /
HUF
Individual/
HUF
Any assessee Any
assessee
Any assessee Individual /
HUF
2 Asset transferred Residential
House
(LTCA)
Urban
Agricultural
Land
Land &
building
forming part
of an industrial
undertaking
Land or
building
or both
(LTCA)
Any LTCA Any LTCA
other than
Residential
House.
3 Other Conditions Income from
such house
should be
chargeable
under the head
“Income from
house
property”
Land should
be used for
agricultural
purposes by
assessee or
his parents or
HUF for 2
years
immediately
preceding the
date of
transfer
Land &
building have
been used for
business of
undertaking
for at least 2
years
immediately
preceding the
date of
transfer.
The transfer
- - Assessee
should not
own more
than one
residential
house on the
date of
transfer. He
should not
purchase
within 2
years or
should be by
way of
compulsory
acquisition of
the industrial
undertaking
construct
within 3
years after
the date of
transfer,
another
residential
house.
4 Qualifying asset
i.e., asset in which
capital gains has
to be invested
One
Residential
House situated
in India
Land for
being used for
agricultural
purpose
(Urban/
Rural)
Land or
Building or
right in land or
building
Bonds of
NHAI or
RECL or
any other
bond
notified
by C.G.
(Redeema
ble after 5
years)
Unit issued
before the 1st
April 2019 of
Specified
Fund as
notified by
the Central
Government
One
Residential
House
situated in
India
5 Time limit for
purchase/
construction
Purchase
within 1 year
before or 2
years after the
date of
transfer
(or)
construct
within 3 years
after the date
of transfer
Purchase
within a
period of 2
years from the
date of
transfer
Purchase/
construct
within 3 years
after transfer,
for shifting or
re-establishing
the existing
undertaking or
setting up a
new industrial
undertaking.
Purchase
within 6
months
from the
date of
transfer
Purchase
within 6
months after
the date of
such transfer
Purchase
within 1
year before
or 2 years
after the
date of
transfer or
Construct
within 3
years after
the date of
transfer
6 Amount of
Exemption
Cost of new
Residential
House or
Capital Gain,
whichever is
lower, is
exempt
Cost of new
Agricultural
Land or
Capital Gain,
whichever is
lower, is
exempt
Cost of new
asset or
Capital Gain,
whichever is
lower.
Capital
Gain or
amount
invested
in
specified
bonds,
whichever
is lower.
Maximum
permissibl
e
investmen
t out of
capital
gains
arising in
any
financial
year is ₹
50 lakhs,
Capital Gain
or amount
invested in
notified units
of specified
fund,
whichever is
lower.
Maximum
permissible
investment in
such units
out of capital
gains arising
in any FY is
₹ 50 lakhs,
whether such
investment is
made in the
current FY or
subsequent
Cost of new
Residential
House ≥ Net
sale
consideratio
n of original
asset, entire
Capital gain
is exempt.
Cost of new
Residential
House < Net
sale
consideratio
n of original
asset,
proportionat
e capital
gain is
exempt.
whether
such
investmen
t is made
in the
current
FY or
subsequen
t FY or
both.
FY or both.
CA Gaurav Bhatia
Priyanka Gattani
This article aims to:
Highlight amendments of
2018 in IBBC
Amendments in
Insolvency and
Bankruptcy code
Amendments in Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code
Background
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) — billed as the biggest economic reform in India after the Goods and Services Tax (GST) — is a rare example of a speedy rollout and implementation of a much-
needed law.The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,2016 consolidated the archaic Insolvency laws ,provided a consolidated legislation and revolutionised the insolvency regimein India.Undoubtedly , the Code has had a significant impact on the way corporate India functions. Although it is undergoing an initial period of adjustment and cleaning-up, the law lays down a robust framework and time-bound road map to deal with distressed or failed businesses, a welcome contrast from the earlier seemingly never-ending process.
Before and After: How the Law has changed Dealing with Default
Key Existing legislation ,
regulations and non
statutoryguidance amended
Companies Act, 1956/2013
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act, 2002)
Recovery of debts due to banks and financial
institutions act, 1993
(RDDBFI Act, 1993)
SICA Act, 1985
Other enactments for partnerships
&individual insolvencies
Non-statutory guidelines/out of court
mechanism
Objective Section of the
Code
Consolidate and amend laws
relating to insolvency and
bankruptcy
Maximization of value
Time-bound resolution
Promote entrepreneurship and
availability of credit
Alteration of priority of payment
of government dues
Capitalize as Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Board in India
The Code
Process and Players
A Company defaults (Minimum amount Rs. 1 Lakh)
Application to NCLT can be filed by Financial creditors/Operational creditors/Corporate debtor
NCLT to appoint Interim resolution Professional and declare Moratorium (to prevent suits/recovery/asset transfer during the 180/270 days).
The Interim resolution professional (IRP) to form Committee of Creditors.
First Committee of Creditors meeting will decide Final appointment of Resolution Professional.
Approval/Rejection of Resolution Plan by Committee of Creditors(COC)
If 66 % of Creditors (in the Committee, If plan is rejected, Company goes
Only Financial creditors have Voting power) into Liquidation.
Okay Resolution Plan, the revival goes through.
Analysis of the Key Changes made by Amendment Actin January 2018
Application of the Code : Section 2 of the Code is amended by extending the application of the code to personal guarantors to corporate debtors, partnership firms and proprietorship firms; and individuals, other than persons
Invitation to Resolution Applicant : Earlier Resolution applicant defined in the code as “ any person who submits a resolution plan to resolution professionals”. This section was in contrast with Section 25(2)(h). As it was argued that the definition of Resolution applicant should be read in consonance with Section
25(2)(h) of the code which requires the resolution professional to invite prospective lenders, investors and any other person to put forward a resolution plan. Therefore, only a person who is invited by the resolution professional could submit his resolution plan and was considered as Resolution applicant. Now Section 5 of the code is amended and “Resolution applicant means a person, who individually or jointly with any other person, submits a resolution plan to the resolution professional pursuant to the invitation made under clause (h) of subsection (2) of section 25.
The resolution professional shall issue an invitation , including evaluation matrix, to the prospective resolution applicants in accordance with clause (h) of sub-section (2) of section 25, to submit resolution plans at least thirty days before the last date of submission of resolution plans. Where “Evaluation Matrix as defined in sub-regulation (1) of regulation (2)(ha)”, such parameters to be applied and the manner of applying such parameters, as approved by the committee, for consideration of resolution plans for its approval.
The resolution professional shall publish brief particulars of the invitation in Form G of the Schedule: (a) on the website, if any, of the corporate debtor; and (b) on the website, if any, designated by the Board for the purpose.”
Qualifying Criteria for resolution applicants :
Previously, the resolution professional had the liberty to invite any prospective lender, investor and any other person to put forward a resolution plan. Now as per amended section 25(2)(h), Resolution Professionals can invite prospective resolution applicants, who fulfil such
criteria as may be laid down by him with the approval of committee of creditors, having
regard to the complexity and scale of operations of the business of the corporate debtor and such other conditions as may be specified by the Board, to submit a resolution plan or plans.
Disqualification from submitting Resolution plan : Prior to amendment act, it was becoming increasingly common amongst unscrupulous promoters of corporate debtors to themselves submit a resolution plan in a CIRP for their own distressed company and thereof be the resolution applicant.
The amendment act inserted Section 29A prohibited certain person to submit resolution plan if :- (a) an undischarged insolvent (b) a wilful defaulter as per guidelines of the Reserve Bank of
India (c) a person who has an account, or an account of a corporate debtor under the management or control of such person or of whom such person is a promoter, classified as non-performing asset in accordance with the guidelines of the Reserve Bank of India.
(d) a person who has been convicted for any offence punishable with imprisonment for two years or more (e) a person who is disqualified to act as a director under the Companies Act, 2013 (f) a person is prohibited by the Securities and Exchange Board of India from trading or accessing the securities markets (g) a person who has been a promoter or in the management or control of a corporate debtor in which a preferential transaction, undervalued transaction, extortionate credit transaction or fraudulent transaction has taken place and in respect of which an order has been made by the
Adjudicating Authority under this Code (h) a person who has executed an enforceable
guarantee in favour of a creditor in respect of a corporate debtor against which an application for insolvency resolution made by such creditor has been admitted under this Code has been subject to any disability, corresponding to clauses (a) to (h), under any law in a jurisdiction outside India (e) has a connected person not eligible under clauses.
Submission of Resolution Plan:
(a) The committee of creditors shall not approve a resolution plan, submitted before the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017, if resolution applicant is ineligible under Section 29A and may require the resolution professional to invite a fresh resolution plan where no other resolution plan is available with it:
(b) If any person is ineligible under clause (c) of section 29A, the resolution applicant shall be allowed by the committee of creditors such period, not exceeding thirty days, to make
payment of overdue amounts.
(c) Earlier there was no timeline for submitting the Resolution plan approved by COC. Now, as per sub-regulation (4) of regulation 39, the resolution professional shall submit the
resolution plan approved by the committee to the Adjudicating Authority, at least fifteen days before the expiry of the maximum period permitted under section 12 for the completion of the corporate insolvency resolutionprocess, with certification that
i.) The contents of the resolution plan meet all the requirements of the Code and the
Regulations; and ii.) the resolution plan has been approved by the committee.
Prohibition on Sale of Distressed Assets: The liquidator shall not sell the immovable and movable property oractionable claims of the corporate debtor in liquidation to any person who is not eligible to be a resolution applicant.
Amendment in Information Memorandum
As per Sub-regulation (4), the interim resolution professional or the resolution professional,
as the case may be, shall submit an information memorandum in electronic form to each
member of the committee and any potential resolution applicant containing all details of Corporate Debtor as per Para (a) to (l) of Sub regulation 2. But now Sub regulation (2) (j) and (2)(k) are being omitted where in IRP or RP were required to give “Liquidation value” and “Liquidation value due to operational creditors” in the Information Memorandum.
Punishment where no specific penalty or punishment is provided: If any person contravenes any of the provisions of this Code or the rules or regulations made thereunder for which no penalty or punishment is provided in this Code, such person shall be
punishable with fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to two crore rupees .
Analysis of the Key Changes made by Amendment Acts in August 2018
Substitution of the terms "repaid/ repayment" with the terms
"paid/payment" in several provisions of the Code : The Ordinance has substituted the terms 'repaid/ repayment' with the terms 'paid/ payment' for several provisions in the Code. The term 'repayment' implies the action of paying back or reimbursement of the debt. However, the term 'payment' provides a wider meaning to include other outstanding amounts in relation to the debt which may include taxes and cess.
Amendment to the definition of 'Financial Debt' to include the amount raised from allottees in a real estate project:The amendment of Section 5(8)(f) with respect to
the definition of 'Financial Debt' ensures inclusion of home buyers as financial creditors
under the Code. This is because any amount raised from an allotee under a real estate project
shall be taken to be an amount having the commercial effect of borrowing.Prior to the
amendments, the home buyers were not categorised as financial creditors or as operational
creditors. Several judgments laid down that buyers of under construction flats could not be
classified as creditors under the Code. The non-inclusion of home buyers as financial creditors
put such buyers in a disadvantageous position. The home buyers could neither initiate the
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ("CIRP") nor be a part of the Committee of
Creditors nor be guaranteed the receipt of liquidation value under the Resolution Plan. The
only option available to the aggrieved home buyers was to approach the courts for requisite
reliefs. Insertion of the Definition of 'Related Party
The term 'related party' in relation to an individual has been specifically defined by the insertion of Clause (24A) in Section 5 of the Code.
Insolvency resolution by Operational Creditors: The Ordinance clarifies Section 8(2)(a) of the Code pertaining to the insolvency resolution by operational creditors. The provision shall henceforth also include disputes that are not pending in a suit or arbitration proceedings. Prior to the amendment, the corporate debtor was required to bring to the operational creditor's attention, existence of a dispute and its record of pendency in a suit or arbitration
proceedings before such operational creditor could file an application to initiate the CIRP. However, the Ordinance has amended the provision to render incapable the operational creditor from initiating the CIRP even if the existing dispute has not been taken to court or the
arbitration forum.
Section 9 amended
Further, whilst filing an application for the initiation of CIRP by an operational creditor under Section 9 of the Code, the amendments introduced by the Ordinance make the requirement of submitting a certificate from the financial institutions where an operational creditor has account/s, validating non-payment of unpaid operational debt by the corporate debtor under Section 9(3)(c) of the Code, optional. Prior to the amendments, fulfilment of such requirement by the operational creditor for initiating the CIRP was taken to be mandatory due to the wording of the said clause under Section 9. Such requirement was impeding the operational creditors from filing applications for several reasons. Firstly, foreign banks and non-scheduled banks are not included in the
definition of 'financial institutions' provided in the Code. Therefore, an operational creditor holding account/s in such banks could not initiate CIRP. Secondly, if an operational creditor possesses several bank accounts in different banks then it is an arduous task for the said creditor to obtain the certificates for all the accounts in question. Further, obtaining certificates for some accounts and not all of them would not be sufficient evidence of non-
payment. Thirdly, a universal format for such certificates did not exist with the banks. Finally, the said certificate is not conclusive proof of the concerned operational debt having been
fulfilled. To cater to such problems faced by the operational creditors, the requisite amendment in Section 9(3)(c) was made. Moreover, a new requirement as per the amended Section 9(3)(d) is to submit any record, if available, with the information utility validating non-payment of unpaid operational debt by the corporate debtor. In addition, Section 9(3)(e) permits the operational creditor to submit any other evidence that confirms non-payment of unpaid operational debt by the corporate debtor.
Shareholders' approval for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by the corporate applicant:As per the Ordinance, the corporate debtor is
now required to obtain either a special resolution passed by its shareholders or a resolution
passed by a minimum of three-fourth of the total number of its partners in case of a limited
liability partnership, approving the filing of the application initiating the CIRP under Section
10 of the Code. Alterations to the voting thresholds for decision making by Committee of
Creditors: Amendments have been made to the Code wherein the voting threshold for getting approval
of the Committee of Creditors in respect of all major decisions to be taken by the Committee
of Creditors has been reduced from 75% to 66%.
Non-extension of Moratorium to a Surety in a Contract of Guarantee to a Corporate DebtorSection 5A inserted - "Corporate Guarantor" means a corporate person
who is the surety in a contract of guarantee to a corporate debtor.
The provision for moratorium states that instituting suits or continuation of suits or
proceedings against the corporate debtor and its assets shall not be permitted for the duration
of the moratorium. “ The Ordinance has amended Section 14(3)(b) of the Code to clarify that
the applicability of moratorium shall not be extended to a surety in a contract of guarantee to
a corporate debtor. The assets of guarantors of corporate debtors shall be excluded from the
scope of moratorium and the moratorium provisions shall be solely applicable to the assets of
a corporate debtor”.
Extension of the Tenure of Interim Resolution Professional: Earlier, the tenure of the Interim Resolution Professional could not be more than 30 days.
However, post amendment of Section 16(5), the term of the Interim Resolution Professional
extends until such date when the Resolution Professional is appointed.
Compliance of statutory requirements by the Interim Resolution Professional: The Interim Resolution Professional must also comply with legal requisites under applicable
law whilst managing the affairs of the corporate debtor to ensure that the corporate debtor
continues to function as it used to before the commencement of the CIRP subject to the
restrictions imposed upon it under the relevant provisions of the Code. The Ordinance sheds
clarity on the responsibility of the Interim Resolution Professional/ Resolution Professional to
correct the ambiguity in the provision prior to such amendment by the insertion of Section
17(2)(e).
Tenure of Resolution Professional to extend beyond the expiry of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: The amendment to Section 23(1) permits the Resolution Professional to continue to manage
the operations of the corporate debtor even after the expiry of the CIRP till such time the
Adjudicating Authority passes an order.
Prior to such amendment, the Resolution Professional was permitted to manage the
affairs of the corporate debtor for the duration of the CIRP i.e., 180/ 270 days.
Appeal against the decision of the Liquidator: With respect to Section 42, the Ordinance clarifies that the creditor is entitled to appeal to the
Adjudicating Authority against the decision of the liquidator even upon the acceptance of the
claims by such liquidator.
Applicability of the Limitation Act: The insertion of Section 238A seeks to clarify that the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 shall be applicable to the proceedings before the NCLT, NCLAT, DRT and DRAT depending on the case. This means that a creditor must ensure that such creditor seeks remedy under the law within the prescribed time period as provided in the Limitation Act. It is essential to specify the application of the Limitation Act to the Code in order to prohibit creditors and claimants from filing claims in relation to time-barred debts. Creditors and claimants should not be permitted new opportunities to obtain remedy once such debts have become time-barred. The Ordinance seeks to clarify that right to remedy is lost in case of time-barred debts.
Applicability of the Code to Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises: The insertion of Section 240A clarifies that the Central Government is empowered to direct the non-applicability of the provisions of the Code to the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) or permit the applicability subject to modifications.
Conclusion : Upon an analysis of the key amendments to the Code, it can be seen that the Insolvency Law Committee constituted by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs had taken under consideration the lacunae existing in the provisions of the Code and sought to clarify and/ or elaborate the same.
This article aims to: Applicability
Timeline
Checklists for GST Audit
Responsibility of Auditor under GST
Late filing of GSTR – 9
GST Audit
GST Audit
As per Section 2(13) of CGST Act 2017 “Audit” means
(a) the examination of records, returns and other documents maintained or furnished by the registered
person under this act or rules
(b) to verify the correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed and input tax credit availed
(c) to assess the compliance with provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder
GST Audit is required under the following three circumstances :
(a) Audit by Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant – Rule 80 and Section 35(5)
(b) Audit by Tax Authorities – Section 65
(c) Special Audit – Section 66
Applicability
As per Section 35(5) of CGST Act 2017, Every registered person whose turnover during a
financial year exceeds the prescribed limit [Rs 2 Crore by Rule 80(3) of CGST Rules 2017]
shall get his accounts audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant and shall submit
a copy of the audited annual accounts, the reconciliation statement under sub-section (2) of
section 44 of CGST Act 2017 and such other documents in such form and manner as may be
prescribed.
As per Section 44(2) of the CGST Act 2017, Every registered person who is required to get his
accounts audited in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 35 shall furnish,
electronically, the annual return under section 44(1) of CGST Act 2017 along with a copy of
the audited annual accounts and a reconciliation statement, reconciling the value of supplies
declared in the return furnished for the financial year with the audited annual financial statement,
and such other particulars as may be prescribed.
AS per Rule 80(3) of CGST Rules 2017, Every registered person whose aggregate turnover
during a financial year exceeds two crore rupees shall get his accounts audited as specified
under sub-section (5) of section 35 and he shall furnish a copy of audited annual accounts and a
reconciliation statement, duly certified, in FORM GSTR-9C.
Time line
Annual return is required to be filed on or before December 31, 2018. For instance for the financial year
2017-18 (transactions undertaken during July 17 to Mach 18), the last date for filing is December 31,
2018.
Required Forms in GST to be certified by the auditor for Auditing purpose
GSTR 9C: GSTR 9C should be filed by the taxpayers whose annual turnover exceeds Rs 2 crores during
the financial year. All such taxpayers are also required to get their accounts audited and file a copy of
audited annual accounts and reconciliation statement of tax already paid and tax payable as per audited
accounts along with GSTR 9C.
Checklist for GST Audit
List of tax invoiced issued during the period and reconciliation of the same with books of
accounts, this also should be reconciled with the turnover declared in the audited financial
statements. This should be made each GSTIN statewise by the company.
List of debit/credit notes issued during the period and reconciliation of the same with books
of accounts.
In case company has the different units/branch all over India, then the stock transfer between
units/branches also to be reconciled with the books.
Reconciliation of advances received and GST paid for goods & services during July 1 to
15th November 2017 and advances received for services and GST paid for that from
15th November 2017 to 31ST March 2018.
Reconciliation of E-Way bill data with the tax invoices issued during the period GSTIN
statewise
Reconciliation of HSN wise summary with the issued tax invoices
Reconciliation discount given to the customer with purpose and recheck if the same under
GST act allowed or not.
List of Purchase & other service bills accounted during the period & Input credit taken on the
same and further reconciliation with the books and returns.
Ensure all the input credit taken bills are uploaded by the suppliers and it is reflecting in the
GSTR-2A.
Reconciliation of input credit availed and also ensure all the availed credits are eligible as per
the act and the ineligible credits, common credits are reversed & accounted properly.
Details of input credit taken on the fixed assets and
Reconciliation of Reverse charge GST (RCM) payable till the applicable date on all the
applicable expenses and paid the same.
Reconciliation of monthly GST returns with the books of accounts and all the taxable,
exempted & non GST turn over declared in the returns if any differences, reason for the
same.
Check and ensure input credit taken supplier invoices paid within 180 days, if not the same
input to be reversed.
All the credit taken on TRAN-1 credit reflecting in the GST portal and there is no issue on
that.
In case any refund application filed with the department and eligibility & status of the same.
Responsibility of Auditor under GST Thus Auditor has to decide whether he will give
Observation or
Qualification
Observations may be to provide comments on noncompliance, short comings and deficiency of GST
return filed etc.
Qualification means some reservations i.e. adverse comments on the accounts. The value(amount) is also
reported to what extent these are adverse
Late filing of GSTR-9 form?
Late fees for not filing the GSTR 9 within the due date is Rs. 100 per day per act up to a maximum of an
amount calculated at a quarter percent of the taxpayer turnover in the state or union territory. Thus it is Rs
100 under CGST & 100 under SGST, the total penalty is Rs 200 per day of default. There is no late fee on
IGST.