29
Hanoi April 2000 1 Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations Professor André Farber Solvay Business School University of Brussels, Belgium

Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations. Professor André Farber Solvay Business School University of Brussels, Belgium. Time value of money: introduction. Consider simple investment project: Interest rate r = 10%. 121. 1. 0. -100. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 1

Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule1. Foundations

Professor André Farber

Solvay Business School

University of Brussels, Belgium

Page 2: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 2

Time value of money: introduction

• Consider simple investment project:

• Interest rate r = 10%

121

-100

0 1

Page 3: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 3

Net future value

• NFV = +121 - 100 1.10 = 11

• = + C1 - I (1+r)

• Decision rule: invest if NFV>0

• Justification: takes into cost of capital

– cost of financing

– opportunity cost

-100

+100+121

-110

0 1

Page 4: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 4

Net Present Value

• NPV = - 100 + 121/1.10 = + 10

• = - I + C1/(1+r)

• = - I + C1 DF1

• DF1 = 1-year discount factor

• a market price

• C1 DF1 =PV(C1)

• Decision rule: invest if NPV>0

• NPV>0 NFV>0

-100

+121

-121

+110

Page 5: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 5

Internal Rate of Return

• Alternative rule: compare the internal rate of return for the project to the opportunity cost of capital

• Definition of the Internal Rate of Return IRR : (1-period)

IRR = (C1 - I)/I

• In our example: IRR = (121 - 100)/100 = 21%

• The Rate of Return Rule: Invest if IRR > r

Page 6: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 6

IRR versus NPV

• In this simple setting, the NPV rule and the Rate of Return Rule lead to the same decision:

• NPV = -I+C1/(1+r) >0

C1>I(1+r)

• (C1-I)/I>r

IRR>r

Page 7: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 7

IRR: a general definition

• The Internal Rate of Return is the discount rate such that the NPV is equal to zero.

• -I + C1/(1+IRR) 0

• In our example:

• -100 + 121/(1+IRR)=0

• IRR=21% -25.0-20.0

-15.0-10.0

-5.00.05.0

10.015.0

20.025.0

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Discount rateNe

t Pre

sent

Value

IRR

Page 8: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 8

Extension to several periods

• Investment project: -100 in year 0, + 150 in year 5.

• Net future value calculation:

NFV5 = +150 - 100 (1.10)5 = +150 - 161 = -11 <0

Compound interest

• Net present value calculation:

NPV = - 100 + 150/(1.10)5

= - 100 + 150 0.621 = - 6.86

0.621 is the 5-year discount factor DF5 = 1/(1+r)5

a market price

Page 9: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 9

NPV: general formula

• Cash flows: C0 C1 C2 … Ct … CT

• t-year discount factor: DFt = 1/(1+r)t

• NPV = C0 + C1 DF1 + … + Ct DFt + … + CT DFT

Page 10: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 10

NPV calculation - example

• Suppose r = 10%

t 0 1 2 3Cash flow -100 30 60 40Discount Factor 1 0.9091 0.8264 0.7513PresentValue -100.0 27.3 49.6 30.1NPV 6.9

Page 11: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 11

IRR in multiperiod case

• Reinvestment assumption: the IRR calculation assumes that all future cash flows are reinvested at the IRR

• Disadvantages:– Does not distinguish between investing and financing– IRR may not exist or there may be multiple IRR – Problems with mutually exclusive investments

• Advantages:– Easy to understand and communicate

Page 12: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 12

IRR and NPV - Example

Compute the IRR and NPV for the following two projects. Assume the required return is 10%.

Year Project A Project B

0 -$200 -$150

1 $200 $50

2 $800 $100

3 -$800 $150

NPV 42 91

IRR 0%, 100% 36%

Page 13: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 13

NPV Profiles

-150.0

-100.0-50.0

0.0

50.0

100.0150.0

200.0

Project A Project B

Page 14: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 14

The Payback Period Rule

• How long does it take the project to “pay back” its initial investment?

• Payback Period = # of years to recover initial costs

• Minimum Acceptance Criteria: set by management

• Ranking Criteria: set by management

Page 15: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 15

The Payback Period Rule (continued)

• Disadvantages:– Ignores the time value of money

– Ignores CF after payback period

– Biased against long-term projects

– Payback period may not exist or multiple payback periods

– Requires an arbitrary acceptance criteria

– A project accepted based on the payback criteria may not have a positive NPV

• Advantages:– Easy to understand

– Biased toward liquidity

Page 16: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 16

The Profitability Index (PI) Rule

• PI = Total Present Value of future CF’s / Initial Investment

• Minimum Acceptance Criteria: Accept if PI > 1

• Ranking Criteria: Select alternative with highest PI

• Disadvantages:

– Problems with mutually exclusive investments

• Advantages:

– May be useful when available investment funds are limited

– Easy to understand and communicate

– Correct decision when evaluating independent projects

Page 17: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 17

Incremental Cash Flows

• Cash, Cash, Cash, CASH

• Incremental

– Sunk Costs

– Opportunity Costs

– Side Effects

• Tax and Inflation

• Estimating Cash Flows

– Cash flows from operation

– Net capital spending

– Changes in net working capital

• Interest Expense

Page 18: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 18

Summarized balance sheet

• Assets• Fixed assets (FA)

• Working capital requirement (WCR)

• Cash (Cash)

• Liabilities• Stockholders' equity (SE)

• Interest-bearing debt (D)

• FA + WCR + Cash = SE + D

Page 19: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 19

Working capital requirement : definition

• + Accounts receivable

• + Inventories

• + Prepaid expenses

• - Account payable

• - Accrued payroll and other expenses

• (WCR sometimes named "operating working capital")

– Copeland, Koller and Murrin Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, 2d ed. John Wiley 1994

Page 20: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 20

Interest-bearing debt: definition

• + Long-term debt

• + Current maturities of long term debt

• + Notes payable to banks

Page 21: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 21

The Cash Flow Statement

• Let us start from the balance sheet identity:

– FA + WCR + CASH = SE + D

• Over a period: FA + WCR + CASH = SE + D

• But:

SE = STOCK ISSUE + RETAINED EARNINGS

= SI + NET INCOME - DIVIDENDS

FA = INVESTMENT - DEPRECIATION

• (INV - DEP) + WCR + CASH = (SI + NI - DIV) + D

Page 22: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 22

• (NI +DEP - WCR) - (INV) + (SI + D - DIV) = CASH • Net cash flows from

• operating activities (CFop)

• • Cash flow from

• investing activities (CFinv)

• • Cash flow from

• financing activities (CFfin)

Page 23: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 23

Free cash flow

• FCF = (NI +DEP - WCR) - (INV)

• = CFop + CFinv

• From the statement of cash flows

• FCF = - (SI + D - DIV) + CASH

Page 24: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 24

Understanding FCF

CF from operation + CF from investment + CF from financing = CASHCF from operation + CF from investment + CF from financing = CASH

Cash flow from operation

Cash flow from investment

Cash flow from financing

Cash

Page 25: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 25

NPV calculation: example

• Length of investment : 2 years

• Investment : 60 (t = 0)

• Resale value : 20 (t = 3, constant price)

• Depreciation : linear over 2 years

• Revenue : 100/year (constant price)

• Cost of sales : 50/year (constant price) WCR/Sales : 25%

• Real discount rate : 10%

• Corporate tax rate : 40%

Page 26: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 26

Scenario 1: no inflation

Year 0 1 2 3Sales 100 100Cost of sales 50 50EBITD 50 50Depreciation 30 30EBIT 20 20Taxes 8 8 8Net Income 12 12 -8

Net Income 12 12 -8+ Depreciation 30 30-DWCR 25 0 -25Investment -60 20Free cash flow -60 17 42 37

NPV 17.96 IRR 24%

Page 27: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 27

Inflation

• Use nominal cash flow

• Use nominal discount rate

• Nominal versus Real Rate (The Fisher Relation)(1 + Nominal Rate) = (1 + Real Rate) x (1 + Inflation Rate)

• Example:

• Real cash flow year 1 = 110

• Real discount rate = 10%

• Inflation = 20%

• Nominal cash flow = 110 x 1.20

• Nominal discount rate = 1.10 x 1.20 - 1

• NPV = (110 x 1.20)/(1.10 x 1.20) = 110/1.10 = 100

Page 28: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 28

Scenario 2 : Inflation = 100%

Year 0 1 2 3Sales 200 400Cost of sales 100 200EBITD 100 200Depreciation 30 30EBIT 70 170Taxes 28 68 64Net Income 42 102 -64

Net Income 42 102 -8+ Depreciation 30 30-DWCR 50 50 -100Investment -60 160Free cash flow -60 22 82 196

NPV -14.65 IRR 94%

Nominal discount rate:

(1+10%) x (1+100%) = 2.20

Nominal rate = 120%

NPV now negative. Why?

Page 29: Capital budeting decisions with the Net Present Value rule 1. Foundations

Hanoi April 2000 29

Decomposition of NPV

– EBITD after taxes 52.07 52.07

– Depreciation tax shield 20.83 7.93 WCR -3.94 -23.67

– Investment -60 -60

– Resale value after taxes 9.02 9.02

– NPV 17.96 14.65