Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION
CANOPY STRUCTURAL MODELING USING OBJECT-ORIENTED IMAGE
CLASSIFICATION AND LASER SCANNING
First results
Zoltán Vekerdy, Patrick van Laake, Wim Timmermans and Remco Dost
AGRISAR and EAGLE Campaigns Final Workshop
15-16 October 2007
2
Objectives
Forest canopy modelling -PAR
Roughness parameters for energy balance modelling
3
The experiment
Leica HDS2500 Laser scanner and Leica1200 DGPSSpeulderbos site – pine forest4 scanning elevations between 1 and 30 m above ground level + 4 positions on the ground
4
Raw scan data
5
Forest and canopy reconstruction (modelling)
Tree models based on geometric bodiesLocation of trees –location of stems (horizontal section, usually at 1.3 m)PAR modelling
…
6
Roughness height in energy balance modelling
Aerodynamic roughness height: where wind changes from turbulent to laminarDepends on canopy structureNot directly measurableHigh variability (space and time)Approximated, among others, using LAI, NDVI (indirect canopy structure-related parameters, detectable by RS)
Assumptions: Description of vegetation structure – better understanding of vertical distribution of wind (estimate of drag parameters) / sensible heat flux TLS characterizes the canopy densitySurface elevation model characteristics can be estimated from TLS
7
Surface roughness of the forest
Raw Digital Surface Model – 10 cm resolution
Missing pixels nearest neighbourinterpolated – 10 cm resolution
8
Variogram analysis of the DSM
Masked out area: only a few missing pixels at the highest resolution –assumption: neglectablemissing details IsotropicResolution dependence…
Variogram surface of 40 cm lag spacing
9
Semi-variogram dependence on DSM grid size
Empirical semi-variograms
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 5 10 15 20 25
Lag distance
Sem
i-var
iogr
am
10 cm20 cm30 cm40 cm50 cm60 cm
Spherical modelSlightly changing range?Exponentially increasing sill
Sill depenance on grid size
y = 474.74x-0.8478
R2 = 0.9972
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20 40 60 80
Grid size [cm]
Sem
i-var
iogr
am s
ill
SillPower (Sill)
10
Vertical section of the forest
At y=473752
11
Forest density measure
Where VR = voxel with reflecting surfaceV = voxelf = scaling factor
= ∑∑
VV
fD Rf
12
Canopy density distributionCanopy density
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035
1.5
3.5
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.5
27.5
29.5
31.5
33.5
Canopy density
13
What is next?
Sensitivity of forest density values to voxel sizeSpatial structure, clusteringResistance against flow at different height according to woody and ‘soft’ (leaf) volumes (scaling factor)Different speciesWind measurements in and above canopy Relation between aerodynamic roughness height and canopy structureRelation between RS parameters and canopy structure (Lidar?)