41
1 Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH Helen Moore - Lead Research Nurse 9 th JULY 2103

Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

  • Upload
    xanto

  • View
    42

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH. Helen Moore - Lead Research Nurse 9 th JULY 2103. Year 2000 For every 1000 patients diagnosed with cancer in the UK, only 38 were entered into a well-designed peer-reviewed clinical study NCRI and NCRN were established. 2010/11 Recruitment:- - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

1

Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

Helen Moore - Lead Research Nurse

9th JULY 2103

Page 2: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

2

Year 2000

For every 1000 patients diagnosed with cancer in the UK, only 38 were entered into a well-designed peer-reviewed clinical study

NCRI and NCRN were established

Page 3: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

3

2010/11 Recruitment:-

45,783 cancer (& pre-malignant) patients entered into trials (19.8% of incident cases) 5 fold

For every 1000 patients diagnosed with cancer in the UK, 198 entered a well designed trials

Page 4: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

4

Recruitment Targets:-

399 cancer patients 2012-2013 172 into randomised controlled trials

1600 in total (cancer and non-cancer)

Page 5: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

5

Why Do We Need Clinical Research?

Page 6: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

6

Society needs clinical research…………..

Identify unnecessary/ineffective treatments to better utilise resources

Develop targeted screening and treatment programmes from pathological and genetics studies

Healthier population

Attract/retain pharmaceutical industry in the UK

Page 7: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

7

Patients need clinical research ………

Evidence base for best treatment

Reduce deaths

Increase disease-free survival

Improve quality of life/relieve symptoms

Enhance quality of care

More in-depth investigations

Patient choice – should be offered available trial

Patients in trials do better even on standard treatment. (Stiller 1994)

Page 8: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

8

SaTH needs clinical research …..

Supports Trust objectives

Reduces drug budget

Need trials for Foundation Status

Attracts patients & top class staff

Retention of Services and status

Provides training, education and support

Page 9: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

9

Staff need clinical research …

Opportunity to be involved in ‘newer’ drugs/techniques

Support of Clinical Trial staff

Adhere to protocols – safety

Interesting………..stimulating…..challenging

Educational opportunities

Page 10: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

10

Page 11: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

11

Ethical Principles

Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (2000) MREC & R&D approval Based on sound scientific principles Patient’s rights, health and wellbeing

paramount Ethically conducted Appropriate resources and skills

Page 12: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

12

What is Good Clinical Practice (GCP)?

A standard for Clinical Trials

Ensure the rights, safety and well-being of trial subjects

Ensure the integrity of clinical data

GCP concerns everyone working on any aspect of clinical research!

Page 13: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

13

Required to inform study centre within 24hrs of knowing if a trial patient has been admitted

Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Serious Unexpected Suspected Adverse Reaction

(SUSAR) MHRA Inspection

Page 14: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

14

Phases of Trials

Phase I small numbers from test tube to patient maximum tolerated dose (MTD) advanced cancer not a specific cancer pharmakokinetics

Phase II effectiveness of treatment larger numbers optimal dose side-effect profile anti-emetic study

Page 15: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

15

Phase III

test new drug against standard treatment larger numbers (1000’s) RCTs (randomised controlled trials) Quality Of Life component Health Economics - costings

Page 16: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

16

Different Types of Trials

Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs)

Comparing new treatment (study arm) with standard treatment (control arm) -5/6 arms

Treatment randomly allocated

Each group has a similar mix of patients (age, stage of disease, sex)

Reduce bias

Most reliable results

Page 17: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

17

Placebo-Controlled Trials

Control group receive inactive treatment

Where there is no standard to compare with

Can unblind if required

COG trial Cancer of the oesophagus -Gefitinib vs placebo

REACT trial Celecoxib

Page 18: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

18

Non-interventional trials Tissue samples Blood samples Better understanding of cancer Improved screening programmes

Page 19: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

19

Patient Preference Trials

PISCES

Page 20: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

20

Surveillance Trials

FACS Dept of Health

Page 21: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

21

Cancer Clinical Trials

20 open currently recruiting studies 30 closed studies with patients in follow-up More than 2000 patients recruited into cancer trials

over last 15yrs @ SaTH

Page 22: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

22

Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH Broad Portfolio

Chemotherapy

Radiotherapy

Targeted Therapies

Supportive therapies (anti-emetics/bisphosphonates)

Genetics/Epidemiology

Surveillance

Patient Preference

Page 23: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

23

Breast Trials

PERSEPHONE STUDY - (6mths vs 12mths Herceptin)

SafeHer - subcutaneous delivery of Herceptin

T-DM1 - novel antibody drug conjugate

FastForward – 15# vs 5# radiotherapy

SEARCH – genetic study in male breast cancer

Page 24: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

24

Colorectal Trials

Short Course Oncology Therapy study (SCOT) – 4 cycles vs 8 cycles chemotherapy

NSCCG – patients with family history of colorectal cancer – genetics study

Page 25: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

25

Urology Trials

STAMPEDE – Androgen-Deprivation Therapy alone or with Abiraterone or radiotherapy to the prostate

Radicals - Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation in combination after a radical prostatectomy

POUT – role of chemotherapy after a radical nephro-uretectomy

PROMPTS – whether a pre-emptive MRI spine may be beneficial in preventing spinal cord compression in patients with spinal metastases

Familial Prostate – genetics study of men diagnosed under 60yrs

Page 26: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

26

Gynaecology Trials

ICON8 – role of fractionated chemotherapy in women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer

SEARCH – genetics study looking at ovarian and endometrial cancers

PORTEC 3 – role of chemotherapy in High Risk and Advanced Stage Endometrial Carcinoma

Page 27: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

27

Lung Trials

ET – role of ERCC1 in non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy

Page 28: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

28

Pancreatic Trials

ESPAC4 – addition of Capecitabine chemotherapy

Page 29: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

29

Haematology Trials

NSHLG – genetics study

Page 30: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

30

Head and Neck Trials

H&N5000 – genetics study

Page 31: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

31

Dermatology Trials

SEARCH – genetics of melanoma

Page 32: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

32

How do we decide which studies to do at SaTH?

UKCRN Portfolio Academic links Pharmaceutical links Attend national meetings Attend Network meetings Consultants/SpRs

Page 33: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

33

How do we identify patients?

Screen every oncology clinic Attend MDM Attend non-oncology clinics if required Check basic eligibility Starter pack Attend consultation Contact patient after consultation

Page 34: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

34

Patients should always be offered a trial if eligible

Better outcomes for patients in clinical trials, even on standard treatment (Stiller 1994)

Page 35: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

35

Page 36: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

36

Reduced Treatments SCOT (4# vs 8#) Persephone (6mths vs 12mths) 142 saved CDC slots 2011 – 2012

Cost savings Free drugs Free anti-emetics and chemotherapy in ET (£11,000)

Page 37: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

37

IPSOS MORI poll in June 2011

97% of the public believe it’s important for the NHS to support research into new treatments

93% want their local NHS to be encouraged or required to support research

72% would like to be offered opportunities to be involved in trials of new medicines or treatments, if they suffered from a health condition that affects their day-to-day

Page 38: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

38

Mystery shopper campaign

Results showed that:

• 91% of the NHS sites visited did not have information on clinical research opportunities in the obvious places for patients

• Only 34% of the sites visited had information about clinical research on their websites that was useful to patients

• 46% of reception desks told the mystery shopper that they did not do research, or failed to offer any suggestions about what to do next

• More than half of the sites (55%) were unable to provide useful information about clinical research through their Patient Advice and Liaison Service

Page 39: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

39

International Clinical Trials Day Radio Shropshire PPI

R&D Committee Raising profile in Trust

Page 40: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

40

Page 41: Cancer Clinical Trials at SaTH

41

Any questions?