39
Restriction/ Classification Cancelled

Cancelled Classification Restriction

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cancelled Classification Restriction

Restriction/Classification Cancelled

Page 2: Cancelled Classification Restriction

TTACA R14 N0. E6J09

low" . F

NATIONAL ADVISORY COMUTTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

RESEARCH MEMORANDUM

for the

Bureau of Aeronautics, Navy Department

SI14TTLATED ALTITUDE PERFORMANCE OF COMBUSTORS

FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE 240 JET ENGINE

I - 24C-2 COMBUSTOR

By Eugene J. Manganiello, Everett Bernardoand Thomas T. Schroeter

SUIN24ARY

A Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor was investigated at conditionssimulating operation of the 24C .Jet engine at zero ram over -rangesof altitude and engine speed. The investigation was conducted todeterriine the altitude operational limits, that is, the maximumaltitude for various engine speeds at which an average combustor-outlet gas temperature sufficient for operation of the jet enginecould be obtained. Information was also obtained regarding thecharacter of the flames ., the combustion efficiency, the combustor-outlet gas temperature and velocity distributions, the extent ofafterbi-.rning, the flow characteristics of the fuel manifolds, thecombustor inlet-to-outlet total-pressure drop, and the durabilityof the combustor basket.

The results of the investigation indicated that the altitudeoperational limits for zero ram decreased from 12,000 feet at ar_engine speed of 4000 rpm to a minimum of 9000 feet at 6000 rpm,and thence increased to 49,000 feet at 12,000 rpm.. At altitudesbelow the operational limits, flames were essentially steady, but,at altitudes above the operational limits, flames were often cyclingand either blew out or caused violent explosions and vibrations® Atconditions on the altitude operational limits the type of combustionvaried from steady to cycling with increasing fuel-air ratio and thereverse occurred with decreasing fuel-air ratio. In the region ofoperation investigated, the combustion efficiency ranged from 75 to95 percent at altitudes below the operational limits and dropped to55 percent or less at some altitudes above the operational limits®

CAN EL",

Page 3: Cancelled Classification Restriction

2 NACA RM No. E6JO9

The deviations in the local combustor-outlet gas temperatures werewithin +20 to -30 percent of the mean combustor temperature rise forinlet-air temperatures at the low end of the range investigated, butbecame nore uneven (up to ±100 percent) with increasing inlet-airterperatr res. The distribution of the combustor-outlet gas velocityfollowed a similar trend. Practically no afterburning downstream ofthe combustor outlet occurred. At conditions of high inlet-airtemperature several factors indicated that fuel va por or air formedin the fuel manifolds and adversely affected combustion. The com-bustor inlet-to-outlet total-pressure drop can be correlated as afunction of the ratio of the combustion-air inlet density to outletdensity and of the inlet dynamic pressure. The walls of the combustorbasket were warped and burned during 29 hours of operation.

INTRODUCTION

An investigation of the performance of Westinghouse jet enginesconducted in the Cleveland altitude wind tunnel (reference 1) revealedthat the engines will not operate above a limited range of simulatedaltitudes for each engine speed because the combustor cannot producegases of sufficiently high temperature for the turbine to drive thecompressor. As a result of the low altitude limits of engine operationestablished in reference 1, a general investigation to improve thealtitude performance of various models of combustor for the Westinghousejot-propulsion engines was instituted at the NACA Cleveland laboratoryat the request of the Bureau of Aeronautics, Navy Department. Refer-ence 2 presents the simulated altitude performance of a 9.5A combustorand reference 3 presents a study of combustion performance in a19B combustor.

The simulated altitude performance of a 240-2 combustor, which isthe first of a series of 24C combustors investigated, is reportedherein. Ranges of simulated altitudes and engine speeds were investi-gated to determine the altitude operational limits of the 24C jetengine as indicated by the ability of a 24C-2 combustor to provideexhaust gases of the temperatures required by the turbine for engineoperation. Information was also obtained regarding the character ofthe flames, the combustion efficiency, the combustor-outlet gas tem-perature and velocity distributions, the extent of afterburning, theflow characteristics of the fuel manifolds, the combustor inlet-to-outlet total-pressure drop, and the durability of the combustor basket.

Page 4: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA RM No. E6JO9 3

COMBUSTOR

A longitudinal section_ of the Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor andthe immediate auxiliary ducting used in this investigation is shownin figure 1. The combustor is approximately 2216 inches long with

an inside diameter of 2316 inches and a cylindrical core 104inches

in diameter. The outer shell tapers to a diameter of 21 inches atthe combustor outlet and the core tapers to a 13-inch-diametersection.

The combustion occurs within..a basket, shown schematically infigure 2. The basket consists of two tapered concentric annularchambers having mean diameters of 14 and 21 inches, respectively.

The chambers are approximately 116 inches wide at the upstream end

and 6 inches wide at the downstream end and are approximately1216 inches larg. The flame side of each shell of the annularchambers is equipped with five angular stiffener rings. The shellsare perforated with 27 rows of holes lengthwise, which progressively

increase downstream from 2- to 16 -inch diameter, for admitting

combustion air into the basket.

In each of the two annular chambers of the basket an unshieldedfuel manifold is installed. A total of 60 hollow-cone-spray-typefuel-injection nozzles (459 spray angle, 7.5 gal/hr at a pressuredifferential_ of 100 lb/sq in.) is used on the manifolds, 36 on theouter and 24 on the inner manifold. Bench tests were conducted inw'nich all 60 nozzles were calibrated with fuel in the verticallymounted manifolds. The calibrations conducted both before and afterthe investigation indicated a maximum individual deviation from theaverage fuel flow of 3 and 6 percent at fuel-manifold pressures of25 and 5 pounds per square inch, respectively. At the low manifoldpressure the flow from the bottom nozzles was higher than that fromthe top nozzles, which indicates that gravity affected the flowdistribution.

APPARATUS

Test Setup

The general arrangement of the combustor test setup is shownin figure 3. Combustion air and fuel (AN F-28, Amendment-2) weresupplied from the laboratory systems; the fuel was filtered and fed

Page 5: Cancelled Classification Restriction

4

NACA RM No. E6J09

ts. Combustion-valves installed

rs were used tohigher inlet-airnt of fuel withhot and cold streams.ed in efficientthe air supply.the exit riseraltitude-exhaust

of each manifold through separate inle1ressure were controlled with regulatingply and exhaust lines. Electric heate-air temperature over a low range and'ere obtained by burning a metered amou,he air in a preheater and mixing thewas operated at conditions that resultorder to minimize the contamination of

The exhaust gases from the combustor were cooled inwith water sprays and discharged into the laboratorysystem.

to the bottomair f low andin the air-su:regulate inle-tempe raturesa portion OfThe preheatercombustion in

The combustion-air flow was measured with a variable-area orifice.The fuel-manifold pressure was measured at the junction of the inletsto the manifolds with a calibrated Bourdon gage and the fuel wasmetered with calibrated rotameters. Along one side of the combustorsix sight glasses were installed for observing the combustion; anothersight glass was installed downstream of the combustor to afford anaxial view of the annulus (fig. 3). Immediately upstream of thecombustor a. plenum chamber ' a punched plate (approximately 33 percentopen area), and a screen (approximately 62 percent open area) wereinstalled to correct an unsatisfactory inlet velocity distributionobtained during initial runs with a 12-inch-diameter entrance pipe;• T-section was installed at the discharge of the preheater to improve• poor inlet temperature distribution (a variation of ±38 0 F from theaverage) resulting from the use of the preheater. With the finalinlet approach section' the variation in inlet velocity over most ofthe inlet was f2 feet per second during equilibrium flow conditions;the variation in inlet temperature was approximately 4-2 0 F when theelectric heaters were used and approximately ±12 0 F when the fuel-fired preheater° was operated.

Temperature and Pressure Instrumentation

Temperature and pressure instrumentation was installed at fivesections (A-A to E-E) shown in figure 1. The sections are designatedas follows: A-A, combustor inlet; B-B, fuel-nozzle plane; and C-C,combustor outlet (corresponding to turbine-inlet section of engine);instrumentation was installed at sections D-D and E-E to check forafterburning. The orientation of the instruments within the varioussections is illustrated in figure 4; all the instruments were locatedat approximate centers of equal areas. The numbers and types ofinstrument at each section are:

Page 6: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA RM No. EQ09 5

Total- ; Wall static-? Thermocouples pressure pressure taps

tubesI Section Section 1 Section!A-i C-C y-D,E-ESA-A B-B;C-CAA-AjB-B`C-C

Banks ' 4 18. `d ' 21 2 1 4I41 -M -, 4__Probes

per

bank 4^ 4j 4 2Total ; ff

probes; 16I 72; 161 4.

I

161 121 24j 21 21 Q 4

Ile construction details of the thermocouples and the pres-sure probes are illustrated in figure 5. The thermocouples weremade of chrome!-alumel wires and were connected to calibrated self-balancing indicating potentiometers through multiple switches. Allof the thermocouples were unshielded except those at section E-E,which were multiple-shielded in all directions except upstream.All the air-pressure indications were obtained with banes of manom-eters and were photographically recorded.

METHODS AND TESTS

An investigation of the altitude operation of the 2402 cam-bustor was conducted with combustion-air flow and combustor-inletail temperature and pressure simulating operation of the jet engineat zero ram at various altitudes from sea level to 50,000 feet andfor a range of engine speeds from 4000 to 12,000 rpm. Severalinitial runs conducted with the 12-inch-diameter entrance pipe wererepeated after the entrance plenum chamber had been installed anda few of the runs in which the fuel-fired preheater caused an uneventemperature distribution were also repeated after the temperaturedistribution had been improled. The effect of fuel-air ratio uponcombustion was observed at two conditions on the altitude operationallimits. The combustion-air flow and the combustor-inlet air conditionsfor each operating point were obtained from estimated performancecharacteristics of the 24C compressor at zero ram furnished by theWestinghouse Electric Corporation, who also furnished the estimatedvalues a_° the combustor-outlet gas temperatures required for oper-ation of the 24C jet engine. Curves of these estimated values arepresented in figure 6.

Page 7: Cancelled Classification Restriction

C NACA RNI No. E6J09

Ignition of a fuel-air mixture in the combustor was obtained withtwo spark plugs at the following approximate conditions:

Air flow, pounds per second . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Inlet-air pressure, inches of mercury gage. . . . . . . . . . . . 4Fuel flow, pounds per hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200

After ignition was obtained, the combustion-air flow and theinlet-air temperature were set at the desired values while the fuelflow was adjusted to maintain combustion. The iniot-air pressure,initially set higher t'-',a7 desired, was then reduced to its propervalue. In the operational runs the fuel flow was increased whileall other conditions were maintained constant during an attempt toobtain an average combustor-outlet temperature equal to or greaterthan the value required for operation of the jet engine at the par-ticular condition. At the two conditions at which the effect offuel-air ratio upon combustion was observed, however, t'oe fuel flowwas independently varied over a greater range.

In most runs the combustor operating conditions were set withinapproximately 2 percent of the specified values; however, in severalruns the attempt to set the inlet-air pressure resulted in an explosivecycling condition that induced violent vibrations in the setup andeither rendered operation hazardous or caused the flames to beextinguished (blow-out). When cycling combustion did occur, severalchecks were made to ascertain that the combustor could not be operatedat the desired point. At several such points the combustor wassubsequently operated with the inlet-air pressure purposely set highto aid in establishing the altitude operational limits.

Average temperatures, total pressures, and static pressureswere taken as the average of all the respective readings at eachsection. Average inlet and outlet velocities were calculated fromair flow, areas, average static pressures, and average temperaturesat sections A-A and C-C, respectively. The local combustor-outletgas velocities used to obtain the velocity distributions were cal-culated from the individual probe total-pressure indications, thewall static pressure adjacent to each total-pressure rake, and thelocal temperatures interpolated from the indications of the adjacentthermocouple rakes. Fuel-manifold pressure differential was taken asthe difference between the measured fuel-manifold Dressure correctedfor elevation to the center of the manifold and the average staticpressure at section C-C. Although the average static pressure in thecombustion zone at the plane of the fuel-injection nozzles should beused, the pressure at section C-C is considered a close approximation.

Page 8: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA RM No . ' E6JO9 !r = 7

The combustion efficiency is defined as the ratio of the averagegas-temperature rise through the combustor to the temperature risetheoretically obtained with the same fuel-air ratio. Values of thetheoretical temperature rise were obtained from reference 4 for afuel having a hydrogen-carbon ratio of 0.175 and a lower heatingvalue of 18,700 Btu per pound,

The following symbols are used;

6A ratio of air density at section A-A to standard NACA sea-leveldensity

aC ratio of gas density at section C-C to standard NACA sea-leveldensity

AP combustor inlet-to-outlet (sections A-A to C-C) total-pressuredrop, inches mercury

W combustion-air f low, pounds per second

q effective dynamic -m-essure, inches mercury

The effective dynamic pressure q was calculated using the airflow, the average inlet-air temperature and static pressure, and themaximum cross-sectional area of the combustor (354 sci in.), which inthe setup is also equal to the cross-sectional area at section A-A;hence, q is also equal to the dynamic pressure at the inlet for-the configuration investigated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A summary of the data and the calculated results is presented intable I. Remarks on the general operation in each run are included.Runs 1 to 14, 16, 18, and 30, in which the inlet-air velocity ortemperature distribution was uneven, were repeated after improvementof these conditions and data for these initial runs are not includedin the table. The required combustor-outlet gas temperatures wereobtained in four of these runs with uneven inlet distributions butnot in the corresponding repeat runs. Factors that may possiblyaccount for this adverse change in operation are the improvement ofthe inlet distributions and the warping of the basket; warpingwill be subsequently discussed. Because the inlet-air pressureswere set high in runs 15, 17, and 28 1 the actual conditions ofoperation correspond to simulated-altitude and engine-speed pointsother than those attempted; 'both the attempted and the actual pointsare listed

Page 9: Cancelled Classification Restriction

8 NACA PM No. E6JO9,

Altitude Operational Limits

The altitude operational results for zero ram are presented in_figure 7 dapped on a plot of simulated altitude against simulatedengine speed. The data presented are from the runs made with thefinal inlet-approach section; the run numbers for each point areincluded for convenience in referring to table I. The solid curveseparates the inoperable region from the region in which the requiredcombustor-outlet temperatures were attainable and delineates the alti-tude operational limits , . The altitude operational,limit decreasesfrom 12 ' 000 feet at an engine speed of 4000 rpm to a minimum of9000 feet at an engine speed of 6000 rpm and increases with furtherincrease in engine speed until an altitude of 49,000 feet at 1-2 000 rpm(military rated engine speed) is attained. In the low range of enginespeeds combustion was very sensitive to changes in altitude and inthis speed range the operational limit was determined within 1000 feetof altitude. The operational limit over the range of engine speedsfrom approximately 6600 to 9900 rpm was interpolated and is shown bya dashed line. The investigation of this range of the altitude oper-ational limit was prevented by the laboratory-air-supply limit asindicated in the figure.

At a given simulated altitude and engine speed ' the combustorinlet-air temperature and pressure increase with an increase in ramwhile the volume flow of air remains essentially constant. As indi-cated in reference 3 1 increases in combustor inlet-air temperatureand pressure at a constant volume flow of air should improve theoperation of the combustor and hence raise the altitude operationallimits.

Character of Flames

Over most of the range of conditions invest gated three generaltypes of combustion were observed; steady ' cycling, and flickering.Steady combustion was characterized by smooth quiet burning and blueflames, but hot spots appeared on the basket. During cycling com-bustion, blue and yellow flames recurrently flashed along the com-bustor at a frequency of approximately 8 flashes per second; thesetup vibrated violently; an intermittent explosive sound occurred;and the temperatures and the pressures fluctuated. With the inceptionof cycling the combustor-outlet temperatures dropped 2000 .to 3500 F;a reduction in inlet-air pressure or an increase in fuel flow duringcycling combustion often resulted in blow-outs. Cycling and blow-outsoccurred whether or not the spark plugs were energized. Flickeringcombustion usually marked the transition from steady to cycling

Page 10: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA IM No. E6JO9 „CAS 9

combustion and was accompanied by rapidly flickering flames, amoderate decrease in the combustor-outlet temperature, and thedisappearance of the hot spots from the basket. In all runs thecombustion was steady at altitudes below the operational limitsand was either flickering or cycling at altitudes above the oper-ational limits.

At the two conditions on the altitude-operational-limit curve(fig. 7) in which the effect of fuel-air ratio on combustion wasobserved, the flames flickered irregularly and intermittent partialblow-outs occurred at very low fuel-air ratios. Increasing thefuel-air ratio caused and aggravated cycling combustion and pro-gressively intensified the vibrations and explosions in the setupto such an extent that operation was hazardous. Approximately thereverse effect on combustion was observed when the fuel-air ratiowas decreased. When combustion changed from steady to cycling, amarked reduction in the rate of increase in the combustor,-outlettemperatures with fuel-air ratio was noted.

Combustion Efficiency

The combustion efficiency varied from approximately 80 to93 percent at altitudes below the operational limits (steady com-bustion) and from approximately 75 to 80 percent at altitudes abovethe operational limits during flickering combustion; during cyclingcombustion the efficiency dropped to 55 percent or less. For eachsimulated engine speed investigated, increasing the simulated alti-tude resulted in reduced combustion efficiency.

Combustor-Outlet Gas Temperatures and Velocities

Temperature distributi on. - In most runs with steady combustionand inlet-air temperatures at.the low end of the range investigated,the local maximum and minimum outlet temperatures differed from theaverage by approximately 20 and 30 percent, respectively, of themean combustor temperature rise, the deviations being less than2200 F above and 2900 F below the average temperature. With increasinginlet-air temperatures, however, the local maximum and minimum outlettemperatures differed from the average by amounts progressivelyincreasing to approximately 100 percent of the mean combustor temper-ature rise for some cases, the deviations approaching 8000 F aboveand below the average temperature. Cycling combustion resulted inhigher percentage deviations than those for noncycling combustion.

Page 11: Cancelled Classification Restriction

10 NACA RM No. F6J09

The circumferential mean temperature at each of the four radial posi-tions at the combustor outlet differed from the average combustor-outlet temperature by less than 5 percent of the average combustortemperature rise. in most runs.

The combustor-outlet temperature distributions are shown infigure 8 for typical steady and cycling operating conditions fromruns at relatively low (60 0 F) inlet-air temperature (runs 24 and25, respectively); in these runs the conditions differed onlyslightly in air flow and approximately 2 inches of mercury in inlet-air pressure. Radial and circumferential temperature distributionsare presented in polar-coordinate plots with maximum-, average-, andminimum-temperature lines included for reference; radial distributionsare shown.in rectangular-coordinate plots. Figure 8 illustrates thelarge reduction (3000 F) in the average combustor-outlet temperatureeffected by the change from steady to cycling combustion. ..The tem-peratures nearest the outer wall are slightly low in the cyclingcondition but in each condition the circumferential distribution isrelatively good.

Temperature distributions for steady- and cycling-combustionconditions from runs at high (280 0 F) inlet-air temperature (runs42 and 40,,respectively) are shown in figure 9 in plots similar tothose of figure B. In neither run shown in figure 9 did combustionoc6v.r in the top portion of the combustor and in both runs a largevertical temperature gradient existed. The region without combustionand the.temperature deviations were larger in the cycling -combustioncondition than in the steady-combustion condition and are reflectedin the temperature patterns shown in figure 9. The large variationin thethe temperatures and the absence of flames in the top part of thecombustor probably result from the release of fuel vapor or air inthe upper. portion':of the fuel manifolds because of .the high inlet-airtemperature in these runs. This probability is subsequently discussed.

Velocity distribution. - Tree velocity distributions at the com-._bustor outlet are shown in figure 10 for the two-runs for which tem-perature.distributions.are presented in figure..S.(runs 24 and 25).The double annulus of the combustor basket was reflected in a doublepeak in the.rediai velocity distribution. The greatest differencein the velocities-was approximately 50 feet per second (from 305 to355 ft/sec) in the steady condition (run 24) and approximately70 feet per.second (260 to 330 ft,sec) in the.cycling condition(run 25),

. . IIndi.cations of afterburning from average gas temperatures. ^-Comparisons of the average gas temperatures, which were measured to

Page 12: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA RM No. E6J09 11

check for afterburning, at sections D-D and E-E with the averagecombustor-outlet gas temperatures at section C-C are shown in fig-ure 11. In neither plot is there evidence of appreciable after-burning, most of the temperatures at sections D-D and E-E being thesame as the corresponding temperatures at section C-C. In some ofthe high-temperature points at section E-E (fig. 11(b)), however, adifference of as much as 2000 F exists, probably because the fourthermocouples at section E-E are not adequate for a true averagetemperature indication; all the differences greater than 50 0 Foccurred when the outlet-gas temperature distribution was uneven.

Fuel-Manifold Characteristics

The variation of fuel flow with fuel-manifold pressure differ-ential is presented in figure 12 and the results are compared withthe bench-test calibration of the'fuel manifold. Runs in which theinlet-air temperature was above 145 0 F are indicated separately anda line of approximately constant inlet-air temperature (260 0 -2900 F)is shown. For a given pressure differential the fuel flow at lowinlet-air temperatures corresponds approximately to that obtained inthe calibration but the fuel flow decreases with increasing inlet-airtemperature; this effect was more pronounced at icw pressure differ-entials. This reduction in fuel .flow at high inlet-air temperatureis believed to be caused by the collection of either fuel vapor orair in the upper portion of the manifolds and their delivery from theupper nozzles with an attendant reduction in the weight of fueldelivered as a result of the large specific volume of the vapor. Areduction in inlet-air temperature or an increase in fuel manifoldpressure differential decreased the difference between the fuel flowindicated by the calibration curve and the fuel flow observed in thetests, which indicated that the amount of liquid fuel discharged fromthe nozzles affected by vaporization increased with any change tendingto inhibit the formation of vapor. The absence of flames in the upperportion of the combustor and the large vertical temperature gradientsobtained with high inlet-air temperatures (examples shown in fig. 9)support the evidence of fuel vaporization or deaeration presented infigure 12. The lack of evidence of vapor formation in runs with lowinlet-air temperature and high average combustor-outlet gas tempera-ture indicates that for the combustor investigated the formation ofvapor is affected more by the inlet-air temperature than by radiationfrom the flames. This effect might be expected because the manifoldsare in direct contact with the combustion air on the upstream sidebut are somewhat shielded from the flames and consequently from radi-ation by the basket on the downstream side. Although the nozzles areexposed to the flames ., the vapor formation in the nozzles due to

Page 13: Cancelled Classification Restriction

12 .Li NACA. RM No. E6J09

radiated heat is probably small because the time required by the fuelto pass through the nozzles is much smaller than that required totraverse the manifolds.

Correlation of Total-Pressure Drop

A correlation of the combustor inlet-to-outlet total-pressuredrop (sections A-A to C-C) with the inlet-to-outlet density ratio ispresented in figure 13. Inasmuch as the relation between total-pressure drop and air flow is a function not only of inlet-air densitybut also of the density change, the data are presented in terms of0A0P/W2 plotted against CA/CTC. A straight line is obtained thatrepresents the data with a scatter of about f5 percent. The expo-nent 2 of W is the value determined from a preliminary logarithmicplot of CARP (combustor total-pressure drop corrected to NACAstandard sea-level density) against W for a selected group of runsin which the values of GA/C C were nearly constant. The morefamiliar pressure-drop term QP/q in which the pressure drop isexpressed as a multiple of the inlet dynamic pressure can be substi-tuted for CADPJW2 ; a multiplying factor of 2105 that results fromthe maximum cross-sectional area of the combustor and the NACAstandard sea-level density is used. A scale of 6P/q is includedin figure 13 for coin.=.lenience. The combustor total-pressure dropvaried ' for runs in which the required confoustor-outlet temperaturewas obtained, from approximately 10.5 to 13 times the inlet dynamicpressure. This pressure drop is the equivalent of 2 to 5 percentof the inlet-air total pressure.

The relation established in figure 13 is cross-plotted in fig-ure 14 in which lines of CARP are plotted against W for variousvalues of CA/GC; the data used to establish the exponent 2 of Ware included. These lines are convenient in finding pressure dropfrom known values of air flow, inlet-air density, and inlet-to-outletdensity ratio.

Condition of Basket

The combustor basket after 29 hours of operation is shown infigure 15. The walls of the basket were warped and burned locally,the center stiffener rings on both the inner and outer shells wereextensively burned,,and a circumferential wrinkle had developed ineach shell, although adequate end clearance had been provided foraxial expansion of the shells. A rust-colored deposit was observed

Page 14: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA RM No. E6JO9 _ 13

on the sections of the basket from the fuel manifolds to the thirdstiffener ring and the rest of the basket was coated with a canary-yellow residue. The yellow residue is typical of lead oxide and byqualitative analysis the rust-colored deposit was found to containmetallic lead and iron and an oxide of nickel. The basket wasslightly discolored when it was received, apparently from previoususe, but it was not burned or warped.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

The results of an investigation of the performance of aWestinghouse 24C-2 combustor in which the operation of the 24C jetengine was simulated at zero ram over ranges of altitudes and enginespeeds showed treat:

1. The operation of a 24C jet engine with a 24C-2 combustorwould be limited at zero ram to an altitude decreasing from12,000 feet at an engine speed of 4000 rpm to a minimum of 9000 feetat an engine speed of 6000 rpm and increasing to an altitude of49,000 feet at an engine speed of 12,000 rpm.

2. At altitudes below the operational limits, flames wereessentially steady but at altitudes above the operational limitsflames were often cycling and either blew out or caused violentexplosions and vibrations.

3. At conditions on the altitude operational limits the type ofcombustion varied from steady to cycling with increasing fuel-airratio and the reverse occurred with decreasing fuel-air ratio.

4. The combustion efficiency ranged from 75 to 95 percent ataltitudes below the operational limits and dropped to 55 percent orless at some altitudes above the operational limit.

5. The deviations in the local combustor-outlet gas temperatureswere within +20 to -30 percent of the mean combustor temperature risefor inlet-air temperatures at the low end of the range investigatedbut became more uneven (up to +100 percent) with increasing inlet-airtemperatures. The distribution of the combustor-outlet gas velocityfollowed a similar trend.

6. Practically no afterburning downstream of the combustor outletoccurred.

Page 15: Cancelled Classification Restriction

14 NACA RM No. E6JO9

7. At conditions of high inlet-air temperature several factorsindicated that fuel vapor or air formed in the fuel manifolds andadversely affected combustion.

S. The combustor inlet-to-outlet total-pressure drop can becorrelated as a function of the ratio of the combustion-air inletdensity to outlet density and of the inlet dynamic pressure.

9. The galls of the combustor basket were warped and burnedduring 29 hours of operation.

Aircraft Engine Research Laboratory,National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics,

Cleveland, Ohio.

e I ' "

Eugene . manganio'1o,Mechanical_ Engineer®

Everett Bernardo,Mechanical Engineer.

Thomas T. 8613roeter,Mechanical Engineer.

Approved: b.^..a^nBenja n Pinkel,

Physicist.va

REFERENCES

1. Fleming, William A.: Altitude Wind.-Tunnel Investigation of theWo stinghouse 19B-2, 198-8, 19XB-1 Jet-Propul,-^lon Engines.I - Operational Characteristics. NA.CA MR No. E6E06, Bur. Aero.,1946.

Page 16: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA RM No. E6J09 15

2. Manganiello, Eugene J., and Bogart, Donald: Simulated AltitudePerformance of Combustors for the Westinghouse 9.5 Jet Engine.I - 9.5A Combustor. NACA MR No. E6F28, Bur. Aero., 1946.

3. Childs, J. Howard, McCafferty, Richard J., and Surine, Oakley W..A Study of Combustion Performance in a Westinghouse 19-B Com-bustor® NACA NI2 No. E6H05, Bur. Aero., 1946.

4. Turner, L. Richard, and Lord, Albert M.: Thermodynamic Chartsfor the Computation of Combustion and Mixture Temperatures atConstant Pressure. NACA TN No. 1086, 1946.

Page 17: Cancelled Classification Restriction

16 1 NACA RM No. E6J09

INDEX OF FIGURES

Page

Figure 1. - Longitudinal section of Westinghouse 24C-2combustor showing auxiliary ducting and instrumenta-tion planes . . . . . . .. F-1

Figure 2. - Schematic diagram of basket for Westinghouse24C-2 combustor.(a) Section of hole arrangement, 27 holes lengthwise. . F-2(b) Longitudinal half section . . . . . , . F-2

Figure 3. - Diagrammatic sketch of general arrangementof setup for Westinghouse 24C combustors. . . . . . . . . . P-3

Figure 4. - Location of instrumentation looking upstreamon Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-4

Figure 5. - Construction details of instrumentation onWestinghouse 24C-2 combustor.(a) Total-pressure rakes and static-pressure taps . . . . . F-5(b) Thermocouple banks and shielded thermocouples . . . . . F-6

Figure 6. - Variation of combustor operating conditionswith engine speed for various altitudes at zero ramfrom performance estimates of the 24 C jet engine bythe Westinghouse Electric Corporation.(a) Combustor-inlet total temperature . . . . . . . . . . . F-7(b) Combustor-inlet total pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7(c) Combustion-air flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-8(d) Required combustor-outlet total gas temperature . . . . F-8

Figure 7. - Altitude operational limits of Westinghouse24C jet engine for zero ram as determined with 24C-2combustor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-9

Figure B. - Temperature distribution at combustor outlet(section C-C, looking upstream) for typical steady andcycling operating conditions from two runs at la7 inlet-air tomperature. Inlet-air temperature, 600 F; Westing-house 24C-2 combustor.(a) Radial and circumferential distribution duringsteady combustion; run 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . F-10

(b) Radial distribution during steady combustion; run 24. . F-10A Radial and circumferential distribution duringcycling combustion; run 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-11

(d) Radial distribution during cycling combustion; run 25 . F-11

Page 18: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA RM No. E6J09

17

Page

Figure 9. - Temperature distribution at combustoroutlet (section C-C, looking upstream) for typicalsteady and cycling operating conditions from tworuns at high inlet-air temperature. Inlet-airtemperature, 2800 F; Westinghouse 240-2 combustor.(a) Radial and circumferential distribution during

steady combustion; run 42 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-12(b) Radial distribution during steady combustion; run 42. . F-12(c) Radial and circumferential distribution duringcycling combustion; run 40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-13

(d) Radial distribution during cycling combustion; run 40 . F-13

Figure 10. - Velocity distribution at combustor outlet(section C-C) for steady and cycling combustion.Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-14

Figure 11. - Relation of average gas temperature atsections D-D and E-E to average combustor-outlet gastemperature at section. C-C. Westinghouse 240 -2combustor.(a) Section D-D . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • . . F-15(b) Section E-E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-16

Figure 12. - Variation of fuel flow with fuel-manifold pressure differential. Westinghouse24C-2 combustor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-17

Figure 13. - Correlation of combustor inlet-to-outlet(section A-A to C-C) to total-pressure drop. Westing-house 24CI-2 combustor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-18

Figure 14. - Combustion-air total-pressure drop fromcombustor inlet to outlet (section A A to C-C).Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-19

Figure 15. - Combustor basket after 29 hours ofoperation. Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor.(a) Entire basket . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-20.(b) Center shell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . F-20

Page 19: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA Flt<) No. E6J09 W6 48

S%WZ I - SUMMARY OF PERYCIMANCE DATA OF WESTINGHOUSE 240-2 ccmwsTCR

Run simulatedaltitude

(ft)

Simulatedenginespeed

(rpm)

Estimatedrequiredoutlettotal Lem-per to a

Combus-tion-airflow, W(lb/sec)

Inlettotaltemper -.ature

(°F)

Inlettotalpressureln. Hg

absolute)

Heel flow( lb/hr)

Fuel-airratio

Fuel-manifoldpressuredifferen-

( ialsq in.)

Aveouttenatu

(c

15 12,800 6,850 963 17.4 120 31.3 785I 0.0126 10.0

10,0005,8 0

699,000

1000

91830

15. 5

104 30.2 800 .0142 10.31920

45;000

19129 96 34,9 ` 780 .0161 9.8 1

2130,Ctâ00 000 10,000

727925

1 .511.2

86149

26.923.7

600615

1 .0133 6.5. 0157 7.8 9

22 50,0 10,000 925 7.0 159 15.10061 1180 500

516.'

.0264 6.8 123 10,000 4,000 1016 9.7 63 24.0 600 ! .0172 1 5.3 102 20,000 6,000 80 11.5 60

i26.0 600 ; .0145 55,2

25 20,000 6,000 80 11.9 `^59 24.0 1 597 ,0138 4.926 15,000 4,000 955 8.3 I+5 22.1 1 503 .0167 ( 4.127 10,000 4,000 1016 9.6 63 74.1 605 .0175 5.3 1

12,000 4,000 99228 11,400 3 960 1001 9.0 55 22.7

439 1 1220 865584. .0179 5.1 10

29 10,000 ,600 974 11.1 72 25.5 680 .0170 7.0 1031 10,000 5,000 959 12.4 81 26.7 730 0163 7.8 1.

85 1275 800

32 10,000 5,400 936 ---- -- ---- ___ ______ -_- _

339,000 6,060 923--

16.5 110 31.6 870 .014 11.5743536

10,00030 ,00030,000

1 6,6009,4009,400

907661861

--17.2----

-141--

---32.5---

-850-

-__-__ !iC138 1 11.6

_

37 30,000 10,000 956 ---- ---3639

30,000 lo,4o0 1021 17.3 188 33,1 951 .0153 15.0 11

4040,000 11,000 1118 ---- ---

4150 00045,000

12,00012,000

14311431

8,210.6

282272

18.0 1 42o ,0142 10.1 1

42434l♦

40,00040,000

12,00011,400

14311220

13.212.8

279236

23.530.126.9

5301060860

.0138I

1 ; .3.0224 y 22.6.0187 14.1

11

j 1

4530,0009.000

10,2006,000

955929

------°

----

---- 400.900-_- 200-650 -

Run Average Com- Average Average Inlet Averago outlet Outlet FAverage Inlet-combustor busti on temper- temper- static inlet

to tai static outlet to-

tempera-rise:Lure

efflci- ature,section

ature,section

pressure(in. Hg

velocityylpreesure(ft/sec) (1n.

pressure velocityy outletency Hg (in. Hg (ft/see) density.

( o F') (per-cent)

D-D(or)

E-E(°F)

absolute) ',absolute); absolute): ra So,/Q'C"A

i

15 11 718 79.1I

668 850 31.2 99 29.8 28.5 401 2.44

171 853 $3.8 969 --- 30.1 90 25,9 27.8 404 1 2.71191 1011 87.3 1105 1108 34.9 66 34.0 33.3 321 1 2.9520 711 74,1 818 775 26.8 78 25.9 25,3 X15 2.4421 812 75.2 965 I 906 23.7 88 22.9 1 22,1 63 2.4922 1052 75.1 1258 1243 19.1 69 18.6 16.2 2 2.82233 972 80,7 1037 1019 24.0 65 23.4 22.9 321 3. 0024! 797 77.0 867 856 25.9 71 25.2 24.6 312 2.c725 485 48,6 559 j 475 1 23.9 79 23.3 22.8 267 2. 0326 I 908 77.0 { 957 9 3 22.1 58 21.6 21.2 282 2.9227 979 79.1 1033 1040 24.0 64 23.4 22.9 X19 3.02

28 984 78.2 1032 1039 22.b 63 22.1 21.6 318 7.0529 1013 84,5 1081 1064 25.4 I, 71 24.7 24.0 368 1 3.0831, 936 80.9 ( 1004 973 26.6 78 25.7 25.0 374 2.9232'3 3 875 83.4 964

1,975 11.5 91 30.2 29.1 415 2_75

35790 80.55 903 905 15_8 98 30_9 14.6 4o9 2_52

36 938 66.9 1132 1016 32.9 loo 31.3 30.0 461 2-683490

547 55.0 763 874

4 83

17.9 104 j 17.3

26_8

16.9 716 1.844142

747131

82.089.6

11381632

10001460

23.530.0

101 22.799 28.7

1 22.127.5

37a 2.22504 3,06

43 1129 88.3 1376 1207 102 25.6 24.5i

2.964b4

5 --- - -- ---- - - - _

838 980 505

957 1110 '115

107 1305 900797 995 525

211 1700 570'5 1240 855

8 7 1005 5704 ( 700 420

953 i 1140 i 745042 1260 i 875 j

017 1175 i 780

985 ^, 1170 840

66931 1070 i 0i_

26 1335

25

I

825

829 16 280069 1860 1 290620 2000 685365 1720 585

Combustor `Condl-total- tlonpressuredrop,6AGp

(in. Hg) (1),.

1.48

..._A..

B

1.23 C100 D.

.6U A,26 A.`7 C.67 A.57 B.38 A.51 C

45 A.66 C.62 A

E1.36 C

E2 66 A

E1.58 C- E.26 B.50 D

1.C2 C1 .90 C

rage lRaximuminnimumlet outlet tletper- temper- temper-re ature ature?'1 (or) (°F')

FF

1Conditions indicated by letters A to p have the following significance:A Inlet pressure above desired value; either steady or flickering combustion; attempt to set pressure caused

explosive cycling combustion.B Required combustor-outlet temperature not attained; either flickering or cycling combustion.C Required combustor-outlet temperature attained; steady combustion.D Required combustor-outlet temperature attainable; fuel flow arbitrarily .set low; steady combustion.E Required oombustor-outlet temperature not attained; data not recorded because of explosive cycling combustion.P Effect of fuel-air ratio upon combustion observed; range of variation limited by partial blow-outs; flames

varied from steady through flickering to explosive cycling.

NATIONAL ADVISOR"'

aCOMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTIC5

Page 20: Cancelled Classification Restriction

E

itudea u s t

E

zn^

Zr

z0

M0C-

0

chamber I— y-II ^ .. ., .., ....open area)

NATIONAL ADVISORYCOMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

Figure 1. — Longitudinal section of Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor showing auxiliary duct-ing and instrumentation planes.

r A

-n

Page 21: Cancelled Classification Restriction

diam.(g'diam.

32

0 0 0 0; o0 0 0 0 000 000;000000;00000: 0000:0

s(a) Section of hole arrangement, 27 holes length—se

12 5"16

NACA. RPM No " F6J 09

1_0

vLL

07

mL

r

"""

"""

"s®b

9BA

0"64

B

0-0—Center line of combustor

(b) Longitudinal half section.

NATIONAL ADVISORYCOMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

Figure 2 " — Schematic diagram of basket for Westinghouse24C-2 combustor.

A'M L

Page 22: Cancelled Classification Restriction

Explosion diaphragm

4vc7D

i^

zO

rnONCl-O^O

Regulatingvalves

ReguIatingvalves

r/^JL

t—_ Adjustabl eLag $orifice geetion Sight glasses

Z30 -in.-diam°—-Laboratoryplenum chambe

zS,c

Fuel inletscombustion-air supply

_- -- Floor level -- --

een

(62 percent Laboratory altitude-- open area) exha,ast system

^Bycass

E. l e c t r cNAT IONAL ADVISORY

COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICSheaters

Figure 30 — Diagrammatic sketch of general arrangement of setup for Westinghouse 24Ccombustors. -t

i

w

Page 23: Cancelled Classification Restriction

+ +

/++

+++ + + -^++ ¢++ *++

++++ I ++++

++ +++ ^

Z

nD

rZO

M

0

Tnermocouple

0 Tota l -pressure tuoe

J1 Stat i c- pressure tap

olelded thermocouple

p6$® dbR m

R aR 9mbd LOWO 6

4 C:9M^ 4 6 ^ b

Section A-A Section g-g

Section C-C

(Combustor inlet)

(Fuel-nozzle plane) U, nmhustor Ou.t let)

I Section p-E NATIONAL ADVISORY

Section D - DCOMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

Figure 4e — Location of instrumentation looking upstream on Westinghouse 24C--2 combus-tor,°n1

Page 24: Cancelled Classification Restriction

a—Iw

i

6

Total- pressure rake,Section B-Bx

cni^a^ c+a r

ACIA Go

Cq

s

i

Is

c *4

_ t., i

C i

0.031"

hole

NACA Rai Noe E6J09 F— 5

Im

Total-pressure rake,

Section A-A

En

Static-pressure tap,---E^Jj Section A-A, B-B, C-C and D-D

Total -pressure rake,Section C-C NATIONAL ADVISORY

COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

(aI Total - pressure rakes and static -pressure taps.

Figure 5. - Construction details of instrumentation on West-inghouse 24C-2 combustor.

Page 25: Cancelled Classification Restriction

Thermocouple bank,Section A-A

Shielded thermocouples,Section E-E

•f

G

f

NACA RM No. E6J 09 F-6

Thermocouple bank, NATIONAL ADVISORYSections C-C and D-D

COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

I b ) Thermocouple banks and shielded thermocouples.

Figure 5. - Concluded. Construction details "of instrumenta-tion on Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor.

Page 26: Cancelled Classification Restriction

-100

120

100

a^

s-e

90tkD

d.o

a; 60

0.

^ 40

a,

20

(a) Combustor-inlet total temperature,

NACA RM Nov E6jO9 L

COMMII AT TEOEN FOR A AERONAUTICS F

F- 7

940

300

d

a

200

aa

1000

m

v0

Altitude(ft)

0

10,000

20,000

30,000over 35,300

Engine speed, rpm(b) Combustor-inlet total pressure.

Figure dQ - Varlation of combustor operating conditions with, engine speed forvarious altitudes at zero seam from performance estimates of the 24C ,etengine by the Westinghouse Electric Corporations

Page 27: Cancelled Classification Restriction

0

1

r-k0

^1a

ms.v

1200

W

ffi

0 100043

v

00

ti0m

.960v

(c) Combustion-air flow.

NACA RM No. E6J09

NATIONAL ADVISORYCOMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

so

400N

OH

^0̀ 30

todrt9u0 SIDinin

e0v

10

F_8Altitude

(ft)

0

10,000 1

20,000

30,0

40,000

50,000

En&ine speed, rpm

(d) Required oombustor®autlet total gas temperature.

Figurevarious®altitudes

aVariation e ramffrombperformancetestimates of the24C

engineen

speedengine

by the Westinghouse Electric Corporation®

Page 28: Cancelled Classification Restriction

50,000

X60 , 000

044

-m30,000

10, 000

ZDnD

zo^

Mo,

0ko

0

O Required combustor-outlet temperature NATIONAL ADVISORY

attainable; steady combustion COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTIC S

a Required combustor-outlet temperaturenot attained; either flickering orcycling combustion 22 0

+ Effect of fuel-air ratio on combustionobserved

(Numbers refer to runs listed in table J i

limit of laboratory2 25 15 / air supply (18 lb/sec)

26

® 28 1 32 17 54 /

23 27 29 r17 33

19

49 000 5, UQU b, UUU °f ,UUU 5 9 UUU y 9 UUU 1U 9 000 11 , 000 1 2,000

Simulated engine speed,

Figure 7® - Altitude operational limits of Westinghouse 24C jet engine for zero ram as ^determined with 24C-2 combustor. ^

Page 29: Cancelled Classification Restriction

El

O

1200t..

0

a

m lODOtida

.ots 80ova

00

600

yp00U

400

NACA RM No. E6J09

F— I0

Temperature( F)

Rum 1005age SNmum 590

Iistance fromouter wall

If oombustor(in.)

2

4JZ

NAIIVNAL AVVIJVrtr

COMMITTEE FO R AERONAUTICS

(a) Radial and oiroumferential distribution during steadycombustion; run 24.

Distance from outer wall of combustor, in.(b) Radial distribution during steady combustion; run 24.

Figure g . - Temperature distribution at combustor outlet (seotion C-C, looking upstream)for typical steady and oycling operatingoonditions from two runs at low inlet-.airtemperature. inlet-air temperature, 60 F; Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor.

Page 30: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA RM No. E6JC9

F_ I I

NATIONAL ADVISCOMMITTEE FOR AERC

(c) Wdial and circumferential distribution during cyclingcombustion; run 25.

`temperature(0P)

--.._ Ma ximum 700

--- Average 544

--. Minimum 420

Distance fromouter wall

of combustor(in.)

0 1

n 1j

0+2

D 3

0

v

v

0)

900

m

v6100

004043

400

Temperature atindicated radial position

0 Maximum circumferentialq Mean circumferentialO Minimum circumferential

I ^-

--

- -

-

i

0 1 2 j

Distance from outer wall of combustor, in.

(d) Radial distribution during cycling combustion; run 25.

Figure 8. - Concluded. Temperature distribution at combustor outlet (section C-C, lookingupstream) for typical steady and cycling operating conditions from two runs at low inlet-air temperature. Inlet-air temperature, 600 F; Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor.

Page 31: Cancelled Classification Restriction

vm

.r

NACA RM No. E6JQ9

P- + Z

L it

O

nil12

NAIIVNAL AVVI9VKT

COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

(a) Radial and circumferential distribution during steadycombustion; run 42.

220

Temperature aindicated radial position

o Maximum ciroumferential0 Mean circumferentialO Minimum circumferential

I

i

ril-

1 I I

-0—

i

i

)I i

w0

180

a140

m

a 100a0t00N

0 60e0v

200® 2Distance from outer wall of combustor, in.

(b) Radial distribution during steady combustion; run 42.Figure 9. - Temperature distribution at combustor outlet (section C-C,looxing upstream)

for typical steady and cycling operating conditions from two runs at high inlet-airtemperature. Inlet-air temperature, 280 0g; Westinghouse 240-2 combustor.,

Page 32: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA Pm No. E6JO9

P- 1

Temperature

.625929280

NAT IONAL ADV I SCRYCOMMITTEE FOR AERONALTJCS

(c) Radial and circumferential distribution during cycling combustion;run 40.

);stance fromouter wallif combustor

(in.)

1

LI

^13

-xI7

1800

1400

r

1000

TejZP eraLU re atindicated radial posit1=1

o Maximum circumferentialMean circumferentialMinimum circumferential feren.tial

0

G 630

OU —

200 --- -- — 1 I — 1

0 1 2 3Distance fromcuter mall of combustor, in.

(d) Radial distributi on during cycling combustion; run 40.Figure 9. - Concluded. Terr.pErat ,.re distribution at combustor outlet (section 3-C.looklag

upstream) for t;-pical steady and cycling operating corAltlons from two runs at high Inlet-air temperature. inlet--Ir te-rperature, 28^-

0 F; Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor.

Page 33: Cancelled Classification Restriction

7- NATIONAL ADVISORY TCOMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

370

rqrq

310(D

s>r,

0

(rt

CT

0

Pressure-probeposition, look®-ing upstream

(o'clock)

a 1100D 9:000 5:00G 3:00

350

330

I V I - '_<4 - - 71^^z 0- ^ I "^ - I I I

Distance from outer gall of combustor, in®

Figure 10. - 'Velocity distribution at combustor outlet (section C) for steady andcycling combustion® Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor. ^'

Page 34: Cancelled Classification Restriction
Page 35: Cancelled Classification Restriction

1600

O

W1400

r.0

vNUf

+, 1200cd

wti

41cdS<

0, 1000

ai

IVO

oI

I

FT-l-

to g00

c^

600

hnn

NACA RM No. E6J09 F-16

NATIONAL ADVISORYCOMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

49.

1 800

Page 36: Cancelled Classification Restriction

NACA RM No. E6J09

F- 1 7

NATIONAL ADVISORYCOMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

,.a4000

2000Bench-test calibration

1000

vo

,° 600w

Inlet-air°w 400 temperature

(OF)

0 Below 145q 145-165Q 165-2600 260-290

208

1002 4 6 10 20 40 60 100

Fuel-manifold pressure differential s lb/sq in.

Figure 12. - Variation of fuel flow with fuel-manifold pressure differ-ential. Westinghouse 24C-2 combustor.

F

Page 37: Cancelled Classification Restriction

16

70

14-

60

zDn

NATIONAL ADVISORYCOMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

z

x 10-4

0

mrn

0

0

0 00 Cb

Page 38: Cancelled Classification Restriction

wAC4 Rw No, E6JO9 F- |g

Page 39: Cancelled Classification Restriction

'^

^ ^^^^

^^

^o

mm^^m

w^c«(h> Center—She|). C. 15941

9- 19-46

Westinghouse 24C-2 comUus-'

^/^o

<a> Ent ira buyhet.~

FiAuro 15 ' - Combustor basket after ZA hours of operationtor.

'^