Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Instructions
1. This Final Report Questionnaire must be submitted and approved by OSCIA to receive your
final payment.
2. Verify you have the proper Final Report Questionnaire for your project. This Final ReportQuestionnaire is for:
Windbreaks and Wind Strips (LEADS) [Category Code: ESIM-LE-K]
3. Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*).
Purpose
The purpose of this Final Report Questionnaire is to identify the results and impact of project activities
completed, as well as client satisfaction, related to Canadian Agricultural Partnership cost-share
funding for producers. Responses will not impact your final claim; however, to receive funding under
the Canadian Agricultural Partnership, this Final Report Questionnaire must be completed.
Contact & Project Details
1. What activities did you complete for this project? (Select all that apply) *
Name of Business/Organization *
Your Name *
Primary Project Contact Name (If different than your name)
Windbreaks
Site preparation
Purchase and/or planting of native or non-invasive introduced species of trees
Purchase and/or planting of native or non-invasive introduced species of shrubs
This question is continued on page 2
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 1 of 10
Project Number *
Your project number should have 6 digits after the Category Code. If your project number is less than 6 digits, please add 0's to make it 6 digits.i.e. CAP-ESIM-LE-K-001234
2. Which of the following improvements will the project result in? (Select allthat apply) *
3. Prior to completing your project, how many acres of your farm operation
were at risk of soil loss and would benefit from a wind strip/windbreak
project? *
acres owned
acres rented
Weed control system
Mulch
Maintenance associated with renovating existing tree plantings to enhance
windbreak function
Wind strips
Seeding for perennial or seasonal vegetative wind strips
Reduced soil loss/disturbance by wind erosion from planting wind strips and
windbreaks
Reduced wind speeds as it crosses your property
Reduced potential of pesticide spray drift
Increased overall health of the soil in the adjacent field(s)
More consistent crop yields across impacted fields where windstrips/windbreaks
were planted
Reduced snow drifting in the winter
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 2 of 10
4. Indicate the size of your wind strip/windbreak project. *
5. For windbreaks, describe the field where you planted your wind break. *
Length (m):
Width (m):
Rows of trees:
One row of trees
Two rows of trees
Two rows of trees with a shrub row
Three or more rows of trees with or without shrubs
Size of field (acres):
Side of field you are adding the windbreak to (Select all that apply):
North side
West side
East side
South side
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 3 of 10
6. What type of crop will your wind strip/windbreak protect? *
High value fruit and/or vegetable crops
Moderate value fruit and/or vegetable crops
Field crops
7. Considering your windbreak or wind strip project, how many acres planted
provide food sources (such as flowers), nesting sites or host plants for
pollinators? *
8. After completing your project, how many acres of your farm operation are
still at risk and would benefit from a wind strip/windbreak project? *
acres owned
acres rented
9. What type of tillage system do you use on your farm operation? (Select allthat apply) *
Acres Owned
No disturbance (e.g. perennial crop)
No-till (soil is minimally disturbed for seed placement only)
Zone till/strip-till (disturbs less than 30% of the soil surface (includes up to 2 passes of vertical tillage)
Reduced till (includes ridge till, 3 or more vertical tillage passes and any other tillage
equipment that doesn’t invert the majority of the residue); 1 to 2 passes after wheat or
corn; Achieves more than 30% residue cover after planting)
Conventional (with spring mouldboard tillage and any other full inversion tillage)
This question is continued on page 5
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 4 of 10
# of acres planted
Conventional (with fall mouldboard tillage and any other full inversion tillage)
Acres Rented
No disturbance (e.g. perennial crop)
No-till (soil is minimally disturbed for seed placement only)
Zone till/strip-till (disturbs less than 30% of the soil surface (includes up to 2 passes of vertical tillage)
Reduced till (includes ridge till, 3 or more vertical tillage passes and any other tillage
equipment that doesn’t invert the majority of the residue); 1 to 2 passes after wheat or
corn; Achieves more than 30% residue cover after planting)
Conventional (with spring mouldboard tillage and any other full inversion tillage)
Conventional (with fall mouldboard tillage and any other full inversion tillage)
Crop Name Year
One Year Two
Year
Three
Year
Four Year Five
Corn - Grain
Corn - Seed
Corn - Silage
(Select one crop per year for each year using historical information and/or combination of planned crops for future years)
This question is continued on page 6
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 5 of 10
10. Identify the typical crop rotation on the impacted field(s) adjacent towhere windbreaks were planted/or on the impacted field(s) where windstrips were planted. *
Alfalfa or clover
Annual fruit
Corn -Sweet
Soybeans Spring cereals (e.g. oats, spring wheat, barley) Winter cereals (e.g. rye, winter wheat, triticale)
11. How do you typically apply nutrients to your crops? (Select all that apply) *
Sugarbeets
Tobacco (e.g. black, flue-cured)
Other (Specify)
Broadcast without incorporation
Broadcast, incorporation within one week
Broadcast with immediate incorporation
Injection
With seed at planting/pop up (spring application)
This question is continued on page 7
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 6 of 10
Edible beans or snap beans
Hay
Millet, sorghum, sudan
Peas
Pasture
Perennial berries and fruit (e.g. apple trees, peach trees, etc.) Perennial ornamental/speciality crop production (e.g. shrubs/trees, ginseng)
Perennial vegetables (e.g. asparagus)
Sod production
Annual ornamental/speciality crop (e.g. field flower production, herbs)
Canola (winter or spring)
Annual vegetable
12. As a result of the project, how likely are the following changes to occur on
your farm operation over the next five years? *
Potential Change
1
Unl ikely
This change could
occur at some time
but is improbable
2
Possible
This change
might occur
at some time
3
L ikely
This change
will probably
occur
4
Almost certain
This change is
expected to
occur
a) Reduced loss ofsoil\sediments from farm fields
b) Reduced loss of phosphorusand other nutrients from farmfieldsc) Reduced impact from extremeweather events e.g. excess water,water shortages, high or lowtemperatures, high windsd) Improved or maintained soilstructure
e) Improved or maintained soilorganic matter
f) Reduced input costs (savingson fertilizer, fuel, etc.)
g) Increased crop yield
13. Did the Farmland Health Check-Up change your priorities for
improvements for your farm? *
Banding
Side-dress
Other (Specify)
Yes No
If yes, why did your priorities change?
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 7 of 10
14. Did the project help you address a risk identified in your EFP Action Plan? *
15. What one risk area did your project most help you address from your EFP
Action Plan? Identify one action from your EFP action plan worksheet*
16. Estimate the percentage of actions identified in your EFP Action Plan thatyou have implemented (with or without cost-share funding assistance). *
17. Did you encounter any barriers to completing this project? *
SELECT ALL BARRIERS THAT APPLY
Yes No
If yes, indicate the change in risk rating expected as a result of completing this project:
Moving from a 1 rating to a 3 rating Moving from a 1 rating to a 4 rating
Moving from a 2 rating to a 3 rating Moving from a 2 rating to a 4 rating
Moving from a 3 rating to a 4 rating
Fourth Edition Workbook, specify one Worksheet # and one Question #
Yes (Indicate Below) No (Skip to Question 18)
Approval timelines (e.g. timing of approval was different than expected)
Priority/process change (e.g. changes in business priorities/processes impacted the project)
Expertise (e.g. challenges accessing technical assistance to plan project solutions)
Financial constraints (e.g. lack of funds or cost increases)
Labour (e.g. insufficient labour to complete project, challenges finding qualified contractors)
0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100%
This question is continued on page 9
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 8 of 10
Service Experience
18. Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following
statements. *
1. Strongly
Disagree2. Disagree
3. Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
4. Agree5. Strongly
Agree
a. Once this project was approved, I receivedall the information needed to proceed tothe next step of the project.
b. The claim forms were easy to understandand complete.
c. I was able to reach appropriate OSCIAstaff without difficulty.
d. OSCIA staff were knowledgeable.
e. I received consistent information fromOSCIA staff.
f. OSCIA staff were courteous.
19. Overall, how satisfied were you with the amount of time it took to get the
service that you required? *
1. Very Dissatisfied 2. Dissatisfied3. Neither Satisfied Nor
Dissatisfied 4. Satisfied 5. Very Satisfied
Technical (e.g. mechanical, electrical, computer systems, automation, equipment)
Time (e.g. unable to meet time requirements, ill-timed, scheduling issues)
Uncontrollable circumstances (e.g. dependency on outside sources not met, weather, vendors, suppliers)
Other (Specify)
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 9 of 10
20. Overall, how satisfied were you with the service you received while
implementing this project? *
1. Very Dissatisfied 2. Dissatisfied3. Neither Satisfied Nor
Dissatisfied 4. Satisfied 5. Very Satisfied
21. To what extent did the availability of funding assistance influence your
decision to undertake this project? *
1. Not At All 2. To a Small Extent 3. To a Moderate Extent 4. To a Great Extent
22. Provide any other comments you would like to share about your
experience related to Canadian Agricultural Partnership LEADS cost-share
funding.
Submission Instructions
Review your answers and email the completed Final Report Questionnaireto [email protected].
Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (LEADS)
ESIM-LE-K 2.0 Page 10 of 10