Can Women Be Good Leaders

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Can Women Be Good Leaders

    1/4

    CAN WOMEN BE GOOD LEADERSMUHAMMD UMAR IRSHAD - SAQIB SHOUKAT

    Department of Social Sciences

    Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall Campus

    [email protected] [email protected]

    Introduction

    It is said that male leaders are more effective in the organizations and feminine is not

    enough to make an organization successful. We have choosen three research articles

    in this regard to make a comparison of these statements. The research reveals the

    gender role stereotypes having different hypothesis for leaders in leadership styles.

    And these stereotypes play significant role for evaluating the leadership behaviors and

    traits if the gender identity is consistently understood.

    Research into leadership and gender has tended to focus ont he inequalities that

    women encounter, while trying to raise the business hierarchy.The purpose of this study is to make compariosn of the male leadership and female

    leadership effectiveness.

    Summary

    The articles we have choosen for our paper, research has been conducted in three

    areas of gende leadership.

    The first one is The moderating effect of gender on leadership intervention

    impact.

    Can leader step outside of the Gender box?

    The road to the glass cliff. Differences in the percieved suitability of men andwomen for leadership positions in succeeding and failing the organiztions.

    In these research articles the feminie leadeship abilities are evaluated and a

    comparison has been made between male and female leadership in different

    situations. For example; in well progressing and declining organizaitons.

    1) The Moderating Effect of Gender on Leadership Intervention Impact

    For the last three decades workforce environment has changed itself rapidly. When

    thinking about leadership or managerail roles, one can be more emphasized on

    stereotypical male attribute rather than emphasize on stereotypical female attribute. It

    is assumed that female can not play leadership roles effectively and can not forcefullyinfluence others. It is due to their kind and sympathetic nature.

    The main difference between male and female is considered that males are supposed

    to be more confident ambitious, courageous, dominant and risk takers. On the other

    hand females are supposed to be kind, caring, friendly and avoid risk taking. Also

    women are viewed as less effective than men, as the number of their male followers

    increase. (Eagly, Makhijani and Klonski 1992).

    In this research two categories were formed to be examined.

    1. (a) All-male

    (b) All-female2. (a) Majority-male (75%)

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/8/2019 Can Women Be Good Leaders

    2/4

    (b) Majority-female (75%)

    We found the following results

    1. The impact of leadership intervention for all male and all female groups, it

    was found that effect size for all-male group was almost equal to the effect

    size of all-female group. This means that leadership intervention have an equaland positive impact across gender.

    2. The effect size for all majority-female group was 18,6% greater than that of

    majority-male group. However, the impacr will likely to be very depending on

    a number of factors and difference is not too much as it seems.

    2) Can Leaders Step Outside of the Gender Box? An Examination of Leadership

    and Gender Role Stereotypes

    Second articlessuggested that gender role stereotypes are still exit and they create the

    expectations that how male and female behaves in leadeship roles. Echiejile (1995)

    categorized the leadership styles into masculine maangement and feminine

    management. Male leaders are expected to use transactional leadership styles andhave the instrumental traits, whereas women are expected to use transforamtional

    leadership style and have the expressive traits.

    These two hypothesis were tested:

    Hypothesis 1: Participants will be more likely to indicate that a leader showing a

    masculine leadeship style is a man rather than a women.

    Hypothesis 2: Participants will be more likely to indicate that a leader showing a

    feminie leadership style is a women rather than a man.

    This research examined the efect of using gender-consistent and gender-inconsistent

    style on four outcomes to assessed the leader by their subordinates which can beexplained as under;

    (a) Subordinates perceptions of leader effectiveness.

    (b) Subordinates trust in the leader.

    (c) Subordinates satisfaction with the leader.

    (d) Subordinates motivation.

    The result showed that the leader in masculine leadership condition was rated higher

    on instrumental traits and transactional leadreship styles than the feminie leadership,

    whereas the leader in feminine leadership condition was rated higher on expressive

    traits and transformational leadership style than the masculine leadership. This

    indicates that manipulation of leadership style was successful.3) The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and

    women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations

    Three experimental studies have been presented in this article for observing that

    women are more likely than men to be appointed on leadership positions where

    gender role vaires time to time. Sometimes men were appointed on top ranks and

    sometime women. This diference si based upon demographic characteristics,

    management styles. Ability to manage the crises, career path and effectiveness as

    leaders.

    Ryan and Haslam (2005) examined the share price performance of companies before

    and after the appointment of male and female as a board directors. Share priceperformance was stable when man was appointed while it becomes poor when a

  • 8/8/2019 Can Women Be Good Leaders

    3/4

    woman had appointed. This suggests that women were more likely than man to find

    themselves on a glass cliff. Womens leadership style tends to be more charismaticthan that of man in times of crises, fear and uncertainty.

    In first experimental study of glass cliff phenomena was conducted by management

    graduates in which men and women are more likely to be chosen for leadership

    position when organizations are in crises. Two hypotheses were taken which is as

    under;

    Women would be more likely to leadership position in a company when its

    performance was declining rather than improving (H1)Glass cliff positions would be well-defined in companies where core business was

    masculine in nature, rather than feminine (H2)

    Women were found to be good leaders when the organisation was in declining stage,

    it suggests that women have more leadership abilities when encountered with crisis

    situations.Our results discovered that when company was in declining rather than

    improving male candidates have less leadership abilities. To examine this issue,

    second study was conducted.

    Second experimental study was conducted by high school students, on the base of first

    study in which same procedures, methods and evaluation process were adopted,

    revealed that when company performance was declining than female candidate

    perceived more ability than the male and appointed on senior position. In particular,

    counterbalancing ensured that the effect did not reflect systematic difference in the

    main candidates attractiveness or perceived suitability of men and women for

    leadership position and this was confirmed by data obtained on additional measures.

    Third experimental study was conducted by business leaders to examine the equally

    qualified male and female candidates for leadership position in companys eitherwhose performance was declining or improving. Two more hypotheses were taken to

    test the participants evaluation of candidate suitability.

    Leadership position in failing companies might be perceived to provide a better

    career opportunity for women rather than men (H3)Leadership position in failing companies might be perceived to be more stressful for

    women than for men (H4)

    This study describe clearly that women are specially selected for risky leadership

    positions associated with organizations in crises, this increases our confidence that

    women tends to be selected for glass cliff positions because these positions are

    stressful. Glass cliff positions offer women best opportunity to break into topmanagement.

    Evaluation:

    Leadership involvement seeems to be neglected some of the inbuilt differences when

    comparing male and female .there is some uncertainty associated with them. There

    may be some demographic differences in these studies. So the reliability seems to be

    doubtful. There is a need to answer a number of questions that are remained

    unsnswered. In one research, data is gathered from the students that have no

    experience of a professional organisation, so it makes the results unreliable. As the

    research should be conducted in professional organisation inssterd of university

    graduates. It clearly remains for future work to investigate the processes in greaterdepth. The broader task for researchers is to identify the general social psychological

  • 8/8/2019 Can Women Be Good Leaders

    4/4

    principles that affect gender leadership and shape behaviors. One thing is that these

    researches are limited to examin the leadership abilities in business organisations, not

    in the non-profit seeking organisations like Police, Armed forces, NGOs and social

    welfare organisations. An other thing is that there is a large number of studies

    conducted with male leadership than with female leadership, so the sources for the

    evaluation of female leadership effectiveness were less than the sources for maleleadership, this casts a question mark on the reliability of the conclusions derived

    from the comparisons. But at least we have a better idea of what is available for

    analysis to help the future work in this area.

    Conclusion:

    These three studies provide us significant approach towards the gender leadership and

    the psychological aspects that contribute to this effect. And these approaches are

    about female leadership abilitites, their capacity to work and to take a decision under

    stressful conditions, and to manage crises. It is stated in the research conducted that

    women can be more effective leaders as compared to men when there is a crisis

    situation and the organization is in declining stage.

    However, leadership in some of the professional jobs are said to be only for the men

    where courage and high mental involvement under stress is necessary. For example,

    armed forces.

    For the last some decades, women involvement in business organizations is increased,

    and womens have proved themselves as good leaders. That is why it is not surprising

    that female managers constituted the majority in employment sectors such as medical

    and health services, human resource management, social and community services and

    educational sector.

    According to U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS), women held about 46% of themanagerial positions by 2004. The increasing number of female managers in

    organizations illustrates that women can exhibit effective leadership roles.

    References:

    The Moderating Effect of Gender on Leadership Intervention Impact: An

    Exploratory Review

    http://online.sagepub.comhttp://jlo.sagepub.com/content/15/4/325.full.pdf+html

    Can Leaders Step Outside of the Gender Box? An Examination of Leadership

    and Gender Role Stereotypes

    http://online.sagepub.com

    http://jlo.sagepub.com/content/15/1/30.full.pdf+html

    The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and

    women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W5N-4TBVPT2-

    2&_user=651540&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=sea

    rch&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035178&_version

    =1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651540&md5=1544d80308fcf69aebd1edcf7d1d4961&s

    earchtype=a

    http://online.sagepub.com/http://jlo.sagepub.com/content/15/4/325.full.pdf+htmlhttp://online.sagepub.com/http://jlo.sagepub.com/content/15/1/30.full.pdf+htmlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W5N-4TBVPT2-2&_user=651540&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035178&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651540&md5=1544d80308fcf69aebd1edcf7d1d4961&searchtype=ahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W5N-4TBVPT2-2&_user=651540&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035178&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651540&md5=1544d80308fcf69aebd1edcf7d1d4961&searchtype=ahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W5N-4TBVPT2-2&_user=651540&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035178&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651540&md5=1544d80308fcf69aebd1edcf7d1d4961&searchtype=ahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W5N-4TBVPT2-2&_user=651540&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035178&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651540&md5=1544d80308fcf69aebd1edcf7d1d4961&searchtype=ahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W5N-4TBVPT2-2&_user=651540&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035178&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651540&md5=1544d80308fcf69aebd1edcf7d1d4961&searchtype=ahttp://online.sagepub.com/http://jlo.sagepub.com/content/15/4/325.full.pdf+htmlhttp://online.sagepub.com/http://jlo.sagepub.com/content/15/1/30.full.pdf+htmlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W5N-4TBVPT2-2&_user=651540&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035178&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651540&md5=1544d80308fcf69aebd1edcf7d1d4961&searchtype=ahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W5N-4TBVPT2-2&_user=651540&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035178&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651540&md5=1544d80308fcf69aebd1edcf7d1d4961&searchtype=ahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W5N-4TBVPT2-2&_user=651540&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035178&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651540&md5=1544d80308fcf69aebd1edcf7d1d4961&searchtype=a