1
Newsdesk severely impair autobiographical recall. In addition, images evoked during autobiographical recall are usually viewed from the first-person perspective. Squire and co-workers found that subjective experiences of recollection were normal in the five patients with damage restricted mainly to the medial temporal lobe. These findings show that “when there is loss of remote memory for events that are specific to time and place as a result of brain damage, some damage must have occurred outside the medial temporal lobe”, first author Peter Bayley told The Lancet Neurology. More specifically, “when there is a loss of remote autobiographical memory for specific events, patients have damage to the neocortex, including the frontal, lateral temporal, or occipital regions”. Squire’s team has taken a critical step to “shed new light on the relationship between the extent of damage and memory loss”, says Paul Frankland (Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Canada). “They show that when damage is limited to the medial temporal lobe, retro- grade amnesia is graded, with more pronounced loss of recent memories. However, when damage also includes additional damages to the neocortex, both old and new memories are lost.” These results are consistent with data from imaging studies in mice, which have shown that when mice are reminded of a recent memory, the hippocampus is activated. However, when they are reminded of an older event, a number of different neocortical sites are activated, suggesting that memories undergo a prolonged process of reorganisation after initial encoding. Squire’s group plans to build on current research by using functional brain imaging to study healthy human volunteers and memory-impaired patients. Laura Thomas http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 4 August 2005 461 Peripheral neuropathic pain is common but difficult to treat. Gene therapy could be the way forward. David Fink and colleagues at the Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Health System (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and the University of Pittsburgh (PA, USA) transferred the glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) gene into the dorsal-root ganglion of rats by use of a herpes-simplex virus- based vector injected under the skin. The result was a significant effect on pain responses. “GABAergic therapy for neuropathic pain has had limited success but gene transfer achieves release of the neurotransmitter in the dorsal horn”, comments Fink. The group previously used the same vector system to transfer proenkephalin and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor, but the size of the anti-touch sensitivity effect achieved with the GAD67-expressing vector was much greater. “This finding could reflect the role of reduced spinal GABAergic tone in the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain and the selective ability of this vector to correct it locally”, adds Fink. “This study is certainly very pro- vocative in that HSV-GAD treatment clearly attenuates accepted measures of neuropathic pain”, comments Raymond Chavez (Avigen, Alameda, CA, USA). Chavez and colleagues Kirk Johnson (Avigen) and Linda Watkins (University of Colorado, Boulder, CL, USA) are looking at the role of glial activation in neuropathic pain states. “Our work with IL-10 has shown a very clear link between proinflammatory cytokine activity and neuropathic pain”, explains Johnson. “We have demonstrated that non-viral gene therapy techniques that drive the local expression of heterologous IL-10 can produce a long-term (ie, 2–3 month) reversal of touch sensitivity by inhibit- ing the release and activity of pro- inflammatory cytokines in the spinal cord.” GABAergic activation can lead to the suppression of cytokine release from microglia, suggesting a common pathway by which IL-10 and GAD over- expression could function, he says. “I most definitely see gene therapy treating chronic pain in the next few years”, enthuses Watkins, but she agrees that some issues still need to be resolved. The first issue is the identification of suitable targets, which necessitates a much more thorough understanding of glial cell biology, explains Chavez. It will also be vital to extend our knowledge of the mechanisms and suitability of various gene-therapy approaches in anatomical regions critical to the pain pathway, such as the spinal cord and the thalamus, he adds. Johnson notes that more information and experimental testing of regulatory mechanisms will be needed to reassure patients that the expression of heterologous genetic material will be transitory and carefully controlled. “But all of this work appears achievable on a relatively short time horizon”, concludes Watkins. Kathryn Senior Can gene therapy take the pain away? © Pasieka/Science Photo Library Dorsal root ganglia could be potential targets for gene therapy for neuropathic pain Rights were not granted to include this image in electronic media. Please refer to the printed journal.

Can gene therapy take the pain away?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Can gene therapy take the pain away?

Newsdesk

severely impair autobiographical recall.In addition, images evoked duringautobiographical recall are usuallyviewed from the first-personperspective. Squire and co-workersfound that subjective experiences ofrecollection were normal in the fivepatients with damage restricted mainlyto the medial temporal lobe.

These findings show that “whenthere is loss of remote memory forevents that are specific to time andplace as a result of brain damage, somedamage must have occurred outsidethe medial temporal lobe”, first authorPeter Bayley told The Lancet Neurology.More specifically, “when there is a loss

of remote autobiographical memory forspecific events, patients have damageto the neocortex, including the frontal,lateral temporal, or occipital regions”.

Squire’s team has taken a critical stepto “shed new light on the relationshipbetween the extent of damage andmemory loss”, says Paul Frankland(Hospital for Sick Children ResearchInstitute, Toronto, Canada). “Theyshow that when damage is limitedto the medial temporal lobe, retro-grade amnesia is graded, with morepronounced loss of recent memories.However, when damage also includesadditional damages to the neocortex,both old and new memories are lost.”

These results are consistent withdata from imaging studies in mice,which have shown that when mice arereminded of a recent memory, thehippocampus is activated. However,when they are reminded of anolder event, a number of differentneocortical sites are activated,suggesting that memories undergo aprolonged process of reorganisationafter initial encoding. Squire’s groupplans to build on current research byusing functional brain imaging tostudy healthy human volunteers andmemory-impaired patients.

Laura Thomas

http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 4 August 2005 461

Peripheral neuropathic pain iscommon but difficult to treat. Genetherapy could be the way forward.David Fink and colleagues at theDepartment of Neurology, Universityof Michigan Health System (Ann Arbor,MI, USA) and the University ofPittsburgh (PA, USA) transferred theglutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)gene into the dorsal-root ganglion ofrats by use of a herpes-simplex virus-based vector injected under the skin.The result was a significant effect onpain responses. “GABAergic therapyfor neuropathic pain has had limitedsuccess but gene transfer achievesrelease of the neurotransmitter in thedorsal horn”, comments Fink.

The group previously used the samevector system to transfer proenkephalinand glial cell-derived neurotrophicfactor, but the size of the anti-touchsensitivity effect achieved with theGAD67-expressing vector was muchgreater. “This finding could reflect therole of reduced spinal GABAergic tonein the pathogenesis of neuropathic painand the selective ability of this vector tocorrect it locally”, adds Fink.

“This study is certainly very pro-vocative in that HSV-GAD treatmentclearly attenuates accepted measuresof neuropathic pain”, comments

Raymond Chavez (Avigen, Alameda,CA, USA). Chavez and colleagues KirkJohnson (Avigen) and Linda Watkins(University of Colorado, Boulder, CL,USA) are looking at the role of glialactivation in neuropathic pain states.“Our work with IL-10 has shown a veryclear link between proinflammatorycytokine activity and neuropathicpain”, explains Johnson. “We havedemonstrated that non-viral genetherapy techniques that drive the localexpression of heterologous IL-10 canproduce a long-term (ie, 2–3 month)reversal of touch sensitivity by inhibit-ing the release and activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the spinalcord.” GABAergic activation can lead tothe suppression of cytokine releasefrom microglia, suggesting a commonpathway by which IL-10 and GAD over-expression could function, he says.

“I most definitely see gene therapytreating chronic pain in the next fewyears”, enthuses Watkins, but sheagrees that some issues still need to beresolved. The first issue is theidentification of suitable targets, whichnecessitates a much more thoroughunderstanding of glial cell biology,explains Chavez. It will also be vital toextend our knowledge of themechanisms and suitability of various

gene-therapy approaches in anatomicalregions critical to the pain pathway,such as the spinal cord and thethalamus, he adds.

Johnson notes that more informationand experimental testing of regulatorymechanisms will be needed to reassurepatients that the expression ofheterologous genetic material will betransitory and carefully controlled. “Butall of this work appears achievableon a relatively short time horizon”,concludes Watkins.

Kathryn Senior

Can gene therapy take the pain away?

© P

asie

ka/S

cien

ce P

hoto

Lib

rary

Dorsal root ganglia could be potential targets for gene therapy for neuropathic pain

Rights were not granted to include thisimage in electronic media. Please refer to

the printed journal.