1
BACKGROUND For over 30 years, the cervical spine immobilisation collar (c-collar) has been the hallmark of excellence in pre-trauma care. However, pre-existing research and evidence for this practice is limited 1 . There is a growing body of evidence against the use of the c-collar that causes more harm than good. Do we over use the c-collar? If so, can nurses safely remove c-collars at triage? Could the unthinkable be happening? IS THE C-COLLAR DEAD AND MERELY AN ALERT TO STAFF THAT THE WEARER MAY HAVE A CERVICAL SPINE INJURY (CSI)? What are you talking about? They are great. Safe and effective Hallmark of high quality trauma patient care A big part of Emergency Medicine training A (and c-spine immobilisation) BC very powerful mnemonic Better to have a protocol which is straight forward and uniform than an individualised one What about the risk of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)? SCI is feared because of the risk of permanent, life threatening or changing consequence for the patient Medico legal and malpractice concerns especially in the U.S. though less so in N.Z. 2 What’s wrong with them? Uncomfortable with prolonged immobilisation Probably do not prevent SCI Often poorly fitted Can be confusion around fixing head and neck with tape (old practice) Risk of pressure necrosis in head, heels and sacrum with long immobilisation 3 . Increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) Compression of jugular veins and decrease of venous return Poor access to neck during airway interventions. AUDIT A recent two month audit undertaken in Wellington ED measuring 46 patients with c-collars applied (Dec 2013 - Jan 2014) CURRENT PRACTICE IN WELLINGTON ED Unconscious patient with c-collar Full protection – collar, ( rigid or Philadelphia) Spinal roll Conscious patient Acute injury comes in collar and remains so until clinically cleared (Canadian or NEXUS guidelines- more on this later) IF NOT CLEARED – stays in either rigid or Philadelphia collar with spinal precautions. Delayed Patient presentation to ED walking/talking – no collar even if positive ‘Rules’ criteria or If truly dangerous mechanism of injury (MOI) of other red flag, apply Philadelphia collar BUT do not insist on lying flat or other precautions Can ED nurses safely examine c-spines using reliable guidelines? A large three year clinical trial undertaken in six Canadian EDs concluded that using the Canadian guidelines by triage nurses was ‘accurate, reliable and clinically acceptable’ . 4 This is supported by another study Pitt et al (2006) using the NEXUS clinical decision making rules. Both studies showed no patient who was assessed by the triage nurses using either tool had a SCI. Teaching plan to ED nurses using the Canadian C-Spine Rule in Wellington ED Full study day by Nurse Educator and Senior Doctor with emphasis on cervical spine anatomy, Canadian C-Spine Rule and individual teaching followed by supervision. CONCLUSION Simple criteria can be used by ED nurses to examine and clear c-spines. The early, active intervention of clearing c-spines will reduce the time patients spend immobilised in ED and ultimately improve patient quality of care. Clearing c-spines by using the Canadian guidelines will de-emphasize the importance of the c-collar in an alert and conscious patient. Can ED nurses safely remove c-collars at triage? Marion Picken - Nurse Educator (RN, MA Nursing) Zaffer Malik - (RN) Wellington Emergency Department FIG 1 Pressure sores related to immobilisation. The elderly patient shown here died principally because of the consequences of his deep and extensive pressure ulcer. He had no spinal injury. The application of a spinal board and prolonged supine positioning were important risk factors. (BMJ 2004;329:495). Canadian C-Spine Rule Canadian C-Spine Rule For alert (GCS=15) and stable trauma patients where cervical spine injury is a concern. 1. Any High-Risk Factor Which Mandates Radiography? Age 65 years or Dangerous mechanism* or Paresthesias in extremities 2. Any Low-Risk Factor Which Allows Safe Assessment of Range of Motion? Simple rearend MVC** or Sitting position in ED or Ambulatory at any time or Delayed onset of neck pain*** or Absence of midline c-spine tenderness 3. Able to Actively Rotate Neck? 45° left and right No Radiography Rule Not Applicable If: - Non-trauma cases - GCS < 15 - Unstable vital signs - Age < 16 years - Acute paralysis - Known vertebral disease - Previous C-spine surgery * Dangerous Mechanism: - fall from elevation 3 feet / 5 stairs - axial load to head, e.g. diving - MVC high speed (>100km/hr), rollover, ejection - motorized recreational vehicles - bicycle struck or collision ** Simple Rearend MVC Excludes: - pushed into oncoming traffic - hit by bus / large truck - rollover - hit by high speed vehicle *** Delayed: - i.e. not immediate onset of neck pain No Yes Able No Yes Unable Radiography Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, Wells GA, Brison R, Schull M, Rowe B, Worthington J, Eisenhauer M, Cass D, Greenberg G, MacPhail I, Dreyer J, Lee J, Bandiera G, Reardon M, Holroyd B, Lesiuk H. Comparative Validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule and the NEXUS Low-Risk Criteria in Alert and Stable Trauma Patients. New Engl J Med 2003; in pr Thanks to: Dr’s Andre Cromhout and Daniel Watson FACEM’s Wellington ED. References: Sundstrom, T., Asbjornsen, H., Habiba, S., Sunde, G., Wester, K. (2014). Prehosptial use of Cervical Collars in Trauma Patients: A Critical Review. Journal of Neurotrauma. 31:531 - 540. Pitt, E., Pedley, A., Nelson, M., Cumming, M., Johnson, M.( 2006). Removal of C-spine protection by A & E triage nurses: a prospective trial of a clinical decision making instrument. Emergency Medical Journal 23: 214-215 Stiell, I., Clement, C Flanagan, B., Marshall, S. (2010). Simulation-based education for building clinical teams. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 3(4), P. 360 -368. Marion Picken, Nurse Educator, Wellington ED, Riddiford St Newtown, Wellington South. [email protected] ph: 04 385 5999 ext 6464 Zaffer Malik, Registered Nurse, Wellington ED, Riddiford St Newtown, Wellington South. zaffi[email protected] ph:04 385 5999 ext 5838 Notes: 1 Pitt, Pedley, Nelson, Cummings, Johnson (2006) 2 Sunstrom, Ashbjornsen, Habiba, Sunde, Wester (2014) 3 Morris, McCoy, Lavery (2004) 4 Steill, Clement, O’Connor, Davies, Leclair, Sheenhan, Clavet, Beland, Mckenzie, Wells (2010) Can nurses safely remove c-collars at triage.indd 1 15/10/2014 12:01:52 PM

Can ED nurses safely remove c-collars at triage?...guidelines by triage nurses was ‘accurate, reliable and clinically acceptable’ .4 This is supported by another study Pitt et

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • BACKGROUND For over 30 years, the cervical spine immobilisation collar (c-collar) has been the hallmark of excellence in pre-trauma care. However, pre-existing research and evidence for this practice is limited1. There is a growing body of evidence against the use of the c-collar that causes more harm than good. Do we over use the c-collar? If so, can nurses safely remove c-collars at triage? Could the unthinkable be happening? IS THE C-COLLAR DEAD AND MERELY AN ALERT TO STAFF THAT THE WEARER MAY HAVE A CERViCAL SpiNE iNjuRY (CSi)?

    What are you talking about? They are great. •Safe and effective •Hallmark of high quality trauma patient care•A big part of Emergency Medicine training•A (and c-spine immobilisation) BC very powerful

    mnemonic•Better to have a protocol which is straight

    forward and uniform than an individualised one

    What about the risk of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)? •SCI is feared because of the risk of permanent,

    life threatening or changing consequence for the patient

    •Medico legal and malpractice concerns especially in the U.S. though less so in N.Z.2

    What’s wrong with them?•Uncomfortable with prolonged immobilisation •Probably do not prevent SCI•Often poorly fitted•Can be confusion around fixing head and neck

    with tape (old practice)•Risk of pressure necrosis in head, heels and

    sacrum with long immobilisation3. Increase in intracranial pressure (ICP)

    •Compression of jugular veins and decrease of venous return

    •Poor access to neck during airway interventions.

    AUDitA recent two month audit undertaken in Wellington ED measuring 46 patients with c-collars applied (Dec 2013 - Jan 2014)

    CURReNt pRACtiCe iN WelliNGtON eDUnconscious patient with c-collar•Full protection – collar, ( rigid or Philadelphia)•Spinal roll

    Conscious patient•Acute injury comes in collar and remains so until

    clinically cleared (Canadian or NEXUS guidelines- more on this later)

    •IF NOT CLEARED – stays in either rigid or Philadelphia collar with spinal precautions.

    Delayed •Patient presentation to ED walking/talking – no

    collar even if positive ‘Rules’ criteria or •If truly dangerous mechanism of injury (MOI) of

    other red flag, apply Philadelphia collar BUT do not insist on lying flat or other precautions

    Can ED nurses safely examine c-spines using reliable guidelines?

    A large three year clinical trial undertaken in six Canadian EDs concluded that using the Canadian guidelines by triage nurses was ‘accurate, reliable and clinically acceptable’ .4 This is supported by another study Pitt et al (2006) using the NEXUS clinical decision making rules. Both studies showed no patient who was assessed by the triage nurses using either tool had a SCI.

    Teaching plan to ED nurses using the Canadian C-Spine Rule in Wellington ED

    Full study day by Nurse Educator and Senior Doctor with emphasis on cervical spine anatomy, Canadian C-Spine Rule and individual teaching followed by supervision.

    CONClUsiON Simple criteria can be used by ED nurses to examine and clear c-spines. The early, active intervention of clearing c-spines will reduce the time patients spend immobilised in ED and ultimately improve patient quality of care. Clearing c-spines by using the Canadian guidelines will de-emphasize the importance of the c-collar in an alert and conscious patient.

    Can ED nurses safely remove c-collars at triage?

    Marion Picken - Nurse Educator (RN, MA Nursing) Zaffer Malik - (RN) Wellington Emergency Department

    Fig 1 Pressure sores related to immobilisation. The elderly patient shown here died principally because of the consequences of his deep and extensive pressure ulcer. He had no spinal injury. The application of a spinal board and prolonged supine positioning were important risk factors. (BMJ 2004;329:495).

    Canadian C-Spine RuleCanadian C-Spine RuleFor alert (GCS=15) and stable trauma patients where cervical spine injury is a concern.1. Any High-Risk Factor WhichMandates Radiography?

    Age ≥ 65 yearsor

    Dangerous mechanism*or

    Paresthesias in extremities

    2. Any Low-Risk Factor Which AllowsSafe Assessment of Range of Motion?Simple rearend MVC**

    orSitting position in ED

    orAmbulatory at any time

    orDelayed onset of neck pain***orAbsence of midline c-spine tenderness

    3. Able to Actively Rotate Neck?45° left and right

    No Radiography

    Rule Not Applicable If:- Non-trauma cases- GCS < 15- Unstable vital signs- Age < 16 years- Acute paralysis- Known vertebral disease- Previous C-spine surgery

    * Dangerous Mechanism:- fall from elevation ≥ 3 feet / 5 stairs- axial load to head, e.g. diving- MVC high speed (>100km/hr), rollover, ejection- motorized recreational vehicles- bicycle struck or collision

    ** Simple Rearend MVC Excludes:- pushed into oncoming traffic- hit by bus / large truck- rollover- hit by high speed vehicle *** Delayed:- i.e. not immediate onset of neck pain

    No

    Yes

    Able

    No

    Yes

    Unable

    Radiography

    Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, Wells GA, Brison R, Schull M, Rowe B, Worthington J, Eisenhauer M, Cass D, Greenberg G, MacPhail I, Dreyer J, Lee J, Bandiera G, Reardon M, Holroyd B,

    Lesiuk H. Comparative Validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule and the NEXUS Low-Risk Criteria in Alert and Stable Trauma Patients. New Engl J Med 2003; in press.

    10242 OTT. HEALTH -8x10s 11/6/03 2:16 PM Page 1

    Thanks to: Dr’s Andre Cromhout and Daniel Watson FACEM’s Wellington ED.

    References: Sundstrom, T., Asbjornsen, H., Habiba, S., Sunde, G., Wester, K. (2014). Prehosptial use of Cervical Collars in Trauma Patients: A Critical Review. Journal of Neurotrauma. 31:531 - 540.

    Pitt, E., Pedley, A., Nelson, M., Cumming, M., Johnson, M.( 2006). Removal of C-spine protection by A & E triage nurses: a prospective trial of a clinical decision making instrument. Emergency Medical Journal 23: 214-215

    Stiell, I., Clement, C Flanagan, B., Marshall, S. (2010). Simulation-based education for building clinical teams. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 3(4), P. 360 -368.

    Marion Picken, Nurse Educator, Wellington ED, Riddiford St Newtown, Wellington South. [email protected] ph: 04 385 5999 ext 6464

    Zaffer Malik, Registered Nurse, Wellington ED, Riddiford St Newtown, Wellington South. [email protected] ph:04 385 5999 ext 5838

    Notes:

    1 Pitt, Pedley, Nelson, Cummings, Johnson (2006) 2 Sunstrom, Ashbjornsen, Habiba, Sunde, Wester (2014)3 Morris, McCoy, Lavery (2004) 4 Steill, Clement, O’Connor, Davies, Leclair, Sheenhan, Clavet, Beland, Mckenzie, Wells (2010)

    Can nurses safely remove c-collars at triage.indd 1 15/10/2014 12:01:52 PM