Can a Satellite Read Your Thoughts

7/31/2019 Can a Satellite Read Your Thoughts

1/24

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts?

Physics Revealed-Part 1

Most people, when they hear of Synthetic Telepathy, especially by means of satellite, jump tothe immediate conclusion that such things are not possible. If they were, we would have heardof them, right?

Looking back at the history of classified technology, places and events shows a wide range oftime periods where things are kept secret. Stealth aircraft are just one example, the F-117Nighthawk was not publicly acknowledged until 1988 although it had been in operation for oversix years. Documents sealed for "National Security" purposes can be hidden away for up to 70years. So, it would be really surprising if certain technologies were not classified as you readthis.

Whilst you can hide certain technology to an extent, what becomes very difficult to hide astime passes is the physics of a given technology. An example would be a nuclear device.Whilst you could, in theory, hide a given nation's development of a nuclear bomb, the physicsstill shows that nuclear fission/fusion is possible. Thus, if you weigh up the various factors

that are required to create a nuclear device, you can make an educated guess as to thelikelihood a nation has such technology.

With this in mind, I decided to look at the transceiver and the physics involved in that process.Its all well and good claiming that a satellite can read thoughts, but how does the physicsstack up?

Figure 1: QED viewpoint of a moving charge

1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawkhttp://rawstory.com/2010/01/details-iraq-whistleblowers-alleged-suicide-sealed-70-years/http://rawstory.com/2010/01/details-iraq-whistleblowers-alleged-suicide-sealed-70-years/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawkhttp://rawstory.com/2010/01/details-iraq-whistleblowers-alleged-suicide-sealed-70-years/http://rawstory.com/2010/01/details-iraq-whistleblowers-alleged-suicide-sealed-70-years/


2/24

Figure 2: Formula to calculate the power density in the far field at a given radius.

Figure 3: ELF satellite array

Does The Brain Transmit Like A Radio

To understand this, we first need to look at how antennas work, its relationship to neurons

and what similarities, if any, exist. Coming from a QED angle, if you take a look at figure 1 wecan get a better viewpoint of how a moving charge creates an EM wave. As the electrical fieldmoves towards the bottom of the picture, virtual photons are radiating magnetic energy intofree space. As per Maxwell's equations, a changing magnetic field will induce a changingelectrical field resulting in a free standing EM wave. This is a good applet that shows how amoving charge produces electromagnetic radiation.

So, what is the connection with neurons? Information is processed by the brain in the form ofelectro-chemical interactions. That is, every perception you have sends electrical signals tothe brain that are routed to specific areas that deal with them. The neuron has a long strandcalled an axon, along this axon propagates an electrical charge. With a resting potential of

-70mV an action potential moves along the axon, in a millisecond, elevating it to a voltage of+30mV which drops off over a few milliseconds. This makes an action potential a form ofalternating current with an almost triangular waveform. As such, this produces a very weakform of modulated electromagnetic radiation or radio source.

For the astute reader, it means that a neuron is a type of transducer.

Can You Hear Me Now?

2
http://www.intuitor.com/resonance/radioTVres.htmlhttp://www.its.caltech.edu/~phys1/java/phys1/MovingCharge/MovingCharge.htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602006000300005http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternating_currenthttp://www.intuitor.com/resonance/radioTVres.htmlhttp://www.its.caltech.edu/~phys1/java/phys1/MovingCharge/MovingCharge.htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602006000300005http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternating_current


3/24

So, whenever you have a thought, feeling, speak or our heart beats, tiny little radio emissionsare being made by the brain that emanate into free space. The real questions are, givenmodern technology can these signals be detected and does a method exist of associatingthem with particular functions? That is, whilst signals in this power range may be detectable,is there something unique about the signals that can be used to differentiate between differentroles?

Let's deal with first problem, detection. I tracked down an example of satellite sensitvity toradio frequencies that should act as a baseline. The following data is from NASA's JetPropulsion Lab:

The sensitivity of our deep-space tracking antennas located around the world is truly amazing.The antennas must capture Voyager information from a signal so weak that the power strikingthe antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts (1 part in 10 quadrillion). A modern-day electronicdigital watch operates at a power level 20 billion times greater than this feeble level.

So, does the brain emit radio waves at a power level greater than 0.0000000000000001 Wattsafter several hundred miles?

To answer this we must turn to this scientific paper. From this paper, we can observe thecharge per square centimeter which is around 22-29 microamperes. We can perform somerough math on these figures that will reveal the answer to our question. The equations arerough and leave out a lot of additional factors, that said, the final figures will not be far fromthe truth and will probably under-estimate the capabilities of current classified technology.

So, using the formula Watts = Voltage x Amperage, we get the following peak power:

0.003 V x 0.0000029 A = 0.0000000087 Watts/cm2

So, at source, the weak radio emission of a cubic centimeter of brain matter is well within thedetectable limits of the satellite. We now need to project that into space and determine thesignal strength at orbital distances. To do this, we need to apply the inverse square law to theemission and the formula is provided in figure 2. So, the formula would be (disregarding gain):

(0.000087 Watts/m2) / (4PI x (500000m^2)) =

0.000087 / 3141592653589.7932384626433832795 =

2.7692960097989788423785774826817e-17 Watts/m2

This is fine, its somewhat larger than our baseline, but nothing that cannot be accounted for.Firstly, we need to identify the frequency range. As noted before, due to Maxwell's equationsthe motion of the action potential results in a changing electrical field. In turn, this results in achanging magnetic field and thus a free space radio wave.

Typical frequencies for an action potential are in the range of 0-500Hz which will result in freespace waves in this range, known as the SLF and ELF Band. This somewhat matches up withexperimental evidence that shows humans do broadcast signals on the ELF band. Thisscientific paperand others show that SLF/ELF reception gear and antennas are of a practicalform factor to be placed upon a satellite. An array of such satellites (see figure 3) would usethe principle ofaperture synthesis to create a type of space-born Very Large Array.

3
http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/reprint/79/3/1549.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_low_frequencyhttp://www.greenfacts.org/en/power-lines/l-2/power-lines-1.htm#2http://piers.mit.edu/piersonline/download.php?file=MDQxMjA4MTAxMzI2fFZvbDFObzJQYWdlMjI3dG8yMzAucGRmhttp://www.springerlink.com/content/v6076g70t5l8854p/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture_synthesishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Arrayhttp://jn.physiology.org/cgi/reprint/79/3/1549.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_low_frequencyhttp://www.greenfacts.org/en/power-lines/l-2/power-lines-1.htm#2http://piers.mit.edu/piersonline/download.php?file=MDQxMjA4MTAxMzI2fFZvbDFObzJQYWdlMjI3dG8yMzAucGRmhttp://www.springerlink.com/content/v6076g70t5l8854p/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture_synthesishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Array


4/24

Given that the Ohio State's radio telescope had a sensitivity, in 1977, of 2 10^-22 W m-2 perchannel and the VLA is described as being 100 times as sensitive, any signals we areproducing could be heard loud-and-clear by a space-borne array. This arrangement wouldprovide for a very high resolution of brain activity.

What's more, the development time line for this technology places the capability to detectbrainwaves as far back as the early 1970's. Given an average lifespan for a satellite as 5 years,with an initial deployment during 1970, the satellite technology would be in its 8th generationtoday.

So, we can detect the signals but now it must be processed.

Information Overload

There is a significant difference between detecting a signal, or signal range, and being able toprocess that information and make sense of it. To do this, we need to find unique patterns in asignal that would allow us to isolate individuals and isolate neural activity we can categorize.

The three main characteristics of a wave are its amplitude, frequency and phase. To be able todetect a single person, in a crowd for example, we need to find something unique about the

waves the are emanating. This allows us to eliminate the noise and only have informationregarding a single person. There are a number of ways this can be achieved. In a satellitearray, examining the timing of signals received across the array, on a given frequency range,will provide you with both the location (in 3D) and the coding of the neuron structure. Fromthis, the function of the cluster can be inferred by comparison with generalizable signals in adatabase.

A cluster of neurons will broadcast across a given range of frequencies, slightly out of phaseand with slight variation in amplitude. The characteristics are dictated to by the rate ofneuronal firing, the timing of neuronal firing and the amount of energy in the neuron at thetime. Given that neurons are biological and the unique structure of a cluster, the statistical

likelihood of the wave characteristics being identical between different people would be quitelow. Thus, from a technical viewpoint, pattern analysis lies at the heart of the development ofa lexicon.

Now, we have our signals, we know what they mean, all that's left is to scale the process up,allowing us to track thousands of targets in real-time. The only real limit here is processinghorse power and satellites.

Conclusion

In answer to our original question, it is technically possible for a satellite to detect your

thoughts, your emotions and your perceptions and pass that information to a computer forinterpretation. I bet that comes as quite a shock.

The only ever real restriction was the receiver sensitivity in the SLF/ELF band. The wholetinfoil hat brigade will be pleased, but will ultimately feel stupid as waves in the SLF/ELF bandcannot be blocked by tinfoil hats. Even in the deepest tube stations, you would be heardperfectly from orbital distances.

4
http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/546/2/1171/40506.text.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_codinghttp://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/546/2/1171/40506.text.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_coding


5/24

Do you see the benefit to intelligence gathering?

So, given that it is technically possible, the questions now become which governments areusing it and why was the public not informed?

There will be a lot of raised eyebrows in the world tonight.

Part 2

The last article in this series caused quite a stir around the Internet. From the legitimatecrazies to the classic muddy-the-water tactics employed by various defense departments, thearticle has drawn attention right across the globe. For those that have been living under arock, the last article in this series demonstrated that action potentials (firing neurons) producedetectable radio signals in the SLF/ELF bands (1-1000Hz).

These radio signals can be used to reveal the thoughts, feelings, vision, spacial reasoning andunconscious activity of the brain. It is simply a matter of correlating the patterns received withthose produced by the various neural networks to decode the activity. I am deliberately

avoiding the term demodulate as no information is modulated onto the radio waves.

One question that keeps popping up is the mechanics of the capture and analysis of theseradio signals. How do we go from an SLF/ELF radio wave, with limited bandwidth, to usableinformation or input that an A.I. can process?

Let's find out.

Obeying The Speed Limit

The first major issue we encounter is at what altitude can we place our orbiting satellites?This is a relatively easy thing to approximate. The speed of light, in a vacuum, is constant. Ittravels at 299,792,458 m/s or nearly 300,000 Km/s and somewhat slower depending on themedium it transverses. Whilst at a glance it would seem that you can place the satellitesanywhere you like, there is a practical limit given the need for two-way communication withthe human brain.

In a single hop scenario, information is captured by satellite and relayed directly to a ground station. Thus, fourtransmissions are required for a round trip.

5
http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/13/4656599-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealedhttp://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/13/4656599-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealed


6/24

In a centralized relay scenario, information is captured by satellite and forwarded to a second satellite in range of aground station. Six transmissions are required at minimum

Whilst it may seem to us that we experience the world as it is happening there is, in fact, asmall delay. This can be anywhere from 100-200ms. To be of any use, an A.I. needs to be ableto analyze information almost as fast as a human can perceive it. That is, for the A.I. to appearto be "in your head", like a form of Schizophrenia, it must leverage the window provided bythe 100-200ms delay. Thus, a round trip, including processing, must be under 200ms for theillusion to be maintained, a maximum of 100ms in either direction. As such, defined limits areimposed upon any solution.

If we examine our first diagram, we can observe a direct relay solution. That is, informationcaptured by the satellite is relayed to a ground station directly. In this scenario, we have fourtransmissions to complete a round trip to the target. Thus, without considering processing,we know that each transmission can be at maximum 50ms. This gives us a maximum altitudeof 14,989.62Km for our satellites which is well below GPS satellites at 20,200Km.

If we now take into consideration processing time, hops between dedicated hardware, lag andatmospheric issues, we could safely approximate 50-80ms. This now reduces our maximumaltitude to around 10,000Km.

We cannot always guarantee that our satellite will be in direct line of sight contact with aground station. In this scenario, we need to relay our information to a satellite that is withintransmitting range. This scenario is demonstrated in the second diagram to the right. As aresult, our altitude could drop to around 6,000Km or less.

Our constellation is not hindered by line-of-sight requirements of Microwaves as SLF/ELF

waves can pass through relatively deep rock and water without a corresponding drop off insignal strength. Thus, a significant drop in altitude would not effect the coverage to any greatextent and 30-60 satellites could provide global coverage.

Such a system need only generate around 0.00000002079 Watts, at ground level on the rightfrequency, to trigger the firing of a neuron. Thus, the SLF/ELF transmitters do not need to beof classical large sizes allowing for dense, power efficient, transmitter arrays in a form factorsuitable for satellite deployment. Just keep in mind that an antenna's function is to increasethe amplitude of a wave through electrical resonance. With such small amplitudes, the

6
http://www.gmat.unsw.edu.au/snap/gps/gps_survey/chap2/222sats.htmhttp://www.gmat.unsw.edu.au/snap/gps/gps_survey/chap2/222sats.htm


7/24

classical submarine transmitters of 50Km or more are not required. In this form factor, a veryrough estimate of a few thousand small antennas, per satellite, is feasible.

So, we have a good approximation of the infrastructure required and the limits that physicsimposes. What we need to analyze now is the processing of that information.

Input, Input, Input

If we examine the third diagram, we can obtain a basic idea of the "snapshot" each satellite

captures. In a given time frame, a range of frequencies is detected. To isolate a particularperson, we use a form of trilateration similar to how GPS functions (see forth diagram). In thiscase, the Digital Signal Processing equipment on the ground replaces the function of the GPSreceiver. Given the nature of SLF/ELF waves, atomic timing and detailed information onsatellite drift and atmospheric conditions, millimeter or greater resolution can be achieved.The margin of error in GPS is related to both the lack of a wide range of information andprocessing power at the GPS receiver.

Basic FFT analysis

Once we have determined our desired location, we can collate the frequencies emanating fromthat particular location and disregard the rest of the information. This provides us with areduced FFT diagram which represents the electrical activity of a particular individual. We canobserve this collated diagram in the fifth image to the right.

From here, it is matter of correlating peaks and patterns against known neural activity. Thisacts as our translator or lexicon to decode the electrical activity into meaningful information.This is shown in the sixth diagram to the right. Performed in near real-time, every activity,thought, feeling, sight or sound can be captured and recorded.

So, we have shown how signal analysis can be used to infer the activity, both physical andmental, of a targeted individual. It also shows that there is not a giant leap in returning suchsignals to the brain and effectively hijacking it. Once the frequencies the target's brainemanates have been isolated, an entire stage of processing (trilateration) can be skipped,unless real-time tracking is required.

7


8/24

Trilateration is employed to accurately define the location of a signal source. Employed by GPS, the reverseprocess can be used to isolate the location of signals emanating from the surface of the Earth

Of course, certain architecture choices can provide additional features applicable to

intelligence gathering. The first is the storage and analysis of historical information. Thisallows the A.I. to refer to elements in your past, even though it was not specifically examiningyou at the time. This can be used to increase the Schizophrenic illusion by inferring that thevoice, or personality, was always there. Further to this, an individual not aware of thepresence of this system, could have their opinions and feelings manipulated. This isespecially useful when a certain political outcome is desired, such as peace negotiations ortrade decisions.

Collated diagram representing electrical activity emanating from a single individual

A second design choice and arguably the most useful, is a modification on keyword analysis."Key Thought Analysis" reviews all data in a particular grid search (for example a province inAfghanistan) to reveal individuals thinking of specific activity. Once located, the spacialresolution can be widened to reveal individuals in their presence and whether this was agroup planning an attack.

8


9/24

A side-on view for demonstration purposes. Each peak represents the amplitude of a specific frequency which isindicative of current activity

Finally, we could have two or more layers of satellites, one used for real-time interaction withan A.I. and a second set simply gathering information. The latter could be at any altitude.

Part 3

In the last couple of articles, I began an analysis to determine if it was scientifically possiblefor thoughts to be read by a satellite. With some ballpark figures, I was able to show the weakradio emissions from the brain could be detected at orbital distances and the basic structureof the signal processing architecture. In this article, we are going to return to our analysis onthe detectability of radio emissions, from the human brain, and obtain some refined figures.

Hopefully, by the end of this article, we will have a series of magic values that our engineeringstandards would need to meet for this system to be a reality. Note that when we come to deal

with the trilateration of the signal, to identify the frequencies associated with the target, thisstage is only required if you want to perform automatic frequency acquisition at orbitaldistances. That is, the short-cut would be to pull up in a van beside the target and perform thefrequency acquisition at close proximity.

Seeing right through you...taken to a whole new level

9
http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/13/4656599-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealedhttp://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/13/4656599-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealedhttp://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/09/20/5139785-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealed-part-2http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/09/20/5139785-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealed-part-2http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/13/4656599-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealedhttp://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/13/4656599-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealedhttp://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/09/20/5139785-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealed-part-2http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/09/20/5139785-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealed-part-2


10/24

In the first article, we showed that body does indeed produce signals in the ELF/SLF/ULFbands. The only potential source is the firing of neurons, regardless of their function. It turnsout this is already known, as the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) cites thefollowing informationto the DOD (note: from 19th Aug 1977):

The writer discusses Kogan's calculation on information transmission. While he points outthat the calculations should not be considered as proof of the validity of the magnetic natureof telepathic signals nor if the existence of telepathy, he suggests that, if telepathy exists andif it takes place by means of radio waves, then one should look in the range of wavelengths of300-1000 km.

I felt it best to reduce the source of the transmission down to neuron level. Running thenumbers, if all we are doing is determining the presence of a signal on a particular frequency,the amount of data is quite low if represented in binary array. The figures are as follows:

For 100,000 neurons100,000 bits12,500 Bytes12.20703125 Kb0.011920928955078125 MB

For 100,00,000 neurons:100,00,000 bits12,500,000 Bytes12,207.03 Kb11.92MB

At the lower end of the data scale, that's about 10 thousand targets with a gigabit throughput.Any satellite, of course, would require a dynamic filter to supply only target information.

I tried to track down better figures for the power of a neuron. The best I could find was model,based upon squid neurons, designed to replicate the Hodgkin Huxley neuron. Given its role asa medical model, it should be pretty accurate. Replacing our previous value of the averagepower per cubic centimeter, we will now recalculate the power density. This time, obtainingthe power density of a single neuron at source:

0.003 V x 0.00000693 A = 0.00000002079 Watts

Next we will calculate the power density at an orbital distance of 500Km. This will give us thefirst of our magic numbers that our engineering standards must meet, the ability to detect thispower density. We will also calculate the Decibel Watts of the signal at this distance:

Neuron at 500KmPDs = 0.00000002079PDr = 6.6176625337610080612701868810291e-21dBW = -201.7929538336266467100376834869

To create a box, of 10m^3, around the target, we need to know the power density of a 10mshift in position of the signal. For illustration purposes, the next calculation shows both thepower density and Decible Watts 10m further than our above calculation:

10
http://www.piers.org/piersonline/download.php?file=MDQxMjA4MTAxMzI2fFZvbDFObzJQYWdlMjI3dG8yMzAucGRmhttp://www.piers.org/piersonline/download.php?file=MDQxMjA4MTAxMzI2fFZvbDFObzJQYWdlMjI3dG8yMzAucGRmhttp://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA051478http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA051478http://mason.gmu.edu/~hsyed1/math447/p3/index.htmlhttp://www.piers.org/piersonline/download.php?file=MDQxMjA4MTAxMzI2fFZvbDFObzJQYWdlMjI3dG8yMzAucGRmhttp://www.piers.org/piersonline/download.php?file=MDQxMjA4MTAxMzI2fFZvbDFObzJQYWdlMjI3dG8yMzAucGRmhttp://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA051478http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA051478http://mason.gmu.edu/~hsyed1/math447/p3/index.html


11/24

Neuron at 500.01KmPDs = 0.00000002079PDr = 6.617397835200640901553868365673e-21dBW = -201.79312754968225324518067477465

This brings us to the second and arguably most important figure, the sensitivity of thereceiver in Decibel Watts. This figure represents the tolerance required to maintain a 10m boxaround the target at all times at an orbital distance of 500Km.

dBW = 0.00017371605560653514299128770107489

To achieve this level of accuracy all sources of error, from electronic to propagation, must notexceed this tolerance for any significant period of time. It is important to note that while thesefigures are still rough, achieve this level of sensitivity and this system will work. The only realissue is one of engineering, not if it can be done.

Imagine what I could do with defense budget and a space program. Now picture what hasalready been done with the defense budget and the space program.

Part 4

In the last article, we refined our figures for the detection of weak radio emissions, from asingle neuron, at orbital distances. Whilst the signal was weak, less than -200dBW, it wasnothing outrageous that a modern satellite array could not detect. In this article, I havedecided to fill in some of the missing blanks when it comes to the actual mechanism thatbetrays our thoughts.

For those that have a deeper interest, or indeed are involved in Neuroscience, I have comeacross a scientific paper which should outline the principle in more scientific terms. Thefollowing paper, published in 1995, describes the electromagnetic induction of "fundamentalalgorithms", or neural networks, to generate any sensory perception required. We will get tohow this functions in a moment, for now, have a quick read:

On the possibility of directly accessing every human brain by electromagnetic induction offundamental algorithms.

Hardware hacking taken to a whole new level

11


12/24

Persinger MA.Behavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Contemporary neuroscience suggests the existence of fundamental algorithms by which allsensory transduction is translated into an intrinsic, brain-specific code. Direct stimulation ofthese codes within the human temporal or limbic cortices by applied electromagnetic patternsmay require energy levels which are within the range of both geomagnetic activity andcontemporary communication networks. A process which is coupled to the narrow band ofbrain temperature could allow all normal human brains to be affected by a subharmonicwhose frequency range at about 10 Hz would only vary by 0.1 Hz.

The brain emits weak radio waves that can be detected and matched against a database of neural network patterns

to reveal what was being thought

Amounting to a security flaw, a radio transmitter can "replay", or transmit, those same frequencies and patternscausing a person to experience sound, images, thoughts, feelings, tastes and smells

12


13/24

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7567396?dopt=Citation

For our astute readers that have been following this series, this is identical to the impliedmechanism cited by the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) in 1977. A full 18 yearsprior to the release of the above paper. The description is as follows:

The writer discusses Kogan's calculation on information transmission. While he points outthat the calculations should not be considered as proof of the validity of the magnetic natureof telepathic signals nor if the existence of telepathy, he suggests that, if telepathy exists andif it takes place by means of radio waves, then one should look in the range of wavelengths of300-1000 km.

So, how does this actually work?

Hacking The Brain

To understand the issue a little clearer, we will need to treat the human brain much like acomputer with dedicated hardware. In this respect, what we are looking for is one, or more,security flaws that we can exploit. So, we have to come at this much like a hacker would.

We know from our previous articles that the brain emits weak radio frequencies in the sub-1000Hz range. The principles of radio tell us anything that can produce a radio signal, can alsoaccept one. Thus, we have overcome our first major hurdle, the establishment of a physicaltransport layer. A physical transport layer allows for two-way communications.

Given that we know that no information is directly encoded onto the radio waves, thefrequencies are unique due to axon properties and the supply of energy will cause a neuron tofire, we have now established a data transport layer. That is, data is not communicated, it isstimulated in the target and the target experiences whatever that stimulation corresponds to.

If we return to our hacker analogy, what we have found is the human brain, whilst using a

spread spectrum and a highly discreet frequency response to eliminate cross-talk, is unableto label information and determine that it has been processed before. In short, the humanbrain is vulnerable to what is known as a replay attack.

I have provided two diagrams, on the right hand side, to explain how this functions. If we lookat diagram two, we can observe how the neurons, when viewing green grass, emits a specificpattern of radio waves at certain frequencies. If we now look at diagram three, we can observethat transmitting this pattern and frequencies back to the brain will result in the target seeinggreen grass. Of course, there are certain limitations and we will discuss them in a moment.

As we can see, anything we can possibly experience can be reduced to certain patterns and

frequencies emitted from the human brain. As such, any experience can be faked by acomputer and sent to your brain. Thus, it is a matter of recognizing these patterns andfrequencies and this brings us back to the first citation in this article.

13
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7567396?dopt=Citationhttp://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA051478http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7567396?dopt=Citationhttp://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA051478


14/24

As human beings, we all assume that we are unique and that should be the case with ourbrains. As much as we would wish this to be true, it is simply not. We all must perform thesame functions and be wired relatively similarly to conduct those functions. The reason wecan all, for the most part, see, touch, smell, hear and taste indicates that we have all have thesame basic circuitry that allows these perceptions to function. With pattern matching and alarge database we can build a library of thoughts, feelings, images, opinions and sounds thatare generally applicable to anyone.

Thus, as the above citation calls it, we all have certain fundamental algorithms. As such, we allemit very similar patterns and frequencies due to this similar wiring. The slight variations thatdo occur, prevent us from emitting radio waves that would cause interference in all of ourperceptions. If this we're not the case, we would experience each others thoughts, vision,auditory and emotional experiences every minute of every day. Again, for our astute readers,this would indicate limited acts of natural telepathy due to wave propagation and frequencyresponse. That, however, is a completely different story.

The limitation that I mentioned earlier are the result of actively processing input. That is,whilst I can put phosphenes or bright images in your vision, I may not be able to put moresubtle or complex images. The problem is that the neurons are already firing and I have onlytwo choices, interrupt or accelerate. That would usually translate to either darkness, or abright spot. A similar issue exists with all sensory input. As a result, it is not possible to placesomeone into a VR type environment, but it is possible to scramble their inputs, causing widespread malfunctions, hallucinations and loss of motor skills.

The Dark Side

That's pretty much it for the technical side of the mechanism, but the real question would be,what would it be like? Well, if I got you to think of the phrase "Hello World!" and recorded theassociated frequencies and patterns, I could retransmit them and you would feel that you have

just thought the words "Hello World!", in your own inner voice. Unless you had extensiveexperience with the A.I. and a very deep understanding of your own mind, then it would be

impossible to tell the difference.

Now, imagine a merger talks, or even political agreement. To get a person to commit to anagreement, I simply transmit a copy of my own feelings of acceptance to the target. They nowfeel the way you do about the agreement and will sign. It is also possible to block certainthoughts, or feelings of negativity, and even place your own counter-arguments to thesethoughts directly into their mind. As far as the target is concerned, it was their own idea andthey did it out of their own free will.

Why debate when you can impose your will?

14


15/24

Part 5

Throughout this series we have examined a wide range of aspects, from the conceptualdesign to the transmission power of an individual neuron. Today, I thought we would look at acompletely different aspect. How can we tell that a person is not merely Schizophrenic? Notonly is this somewhat fascinating in itself, but it has the ability to provide some definitiveevidence. That is very important for both medical teams and those involved in NationalSecurity.

The Standardized Criteria

Firstly, I must point out some limitations of this article. The first limitation is that this onlyapplies to those that have the ability to converse with inner voice(s). So, if someone isclaiming the merely hear a voice, or snippets of conversations, then this method of analysiswill be of limited value. Such examples would be categorized in this article. For those of amedical background, the following symptom of Schizophrenia is being referred to:

Early in our training many of us made the mistake of asking patients in the hospitalpsychiatric emergency room if they were hearing voices of people who are not there. Some ofus thought the patients were lying when they told us that they were not hearing voices,whether of someone there or not there. You see, for these patients, they were not hearingvoices but were carrying on conversations with someone else. Again, these patients were notimagining a conversation but were really, really having a conversation. Therefore, they werenot "hearing voices" but were being spoken to. The same applies to each of the other types ofhallucinations affecting each of the other sense organs.

Allan Schwartz, Ph.D.Dr. Schwartz's Weblog

http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=28686

Now that we have that established, let us examine some of the diagnostic criteria that definesSchizophrenia. What I am looking at is whether or not the basic diagnostic criteria can befaked by Synthetic Telepathy and if there is any medical way it can be differentiated fromSchizophrenia.

If you want to follow along with this, I will be heavily referring to a video by William McFarlaneM.D of the Maine Medical Center entitled "Schizophrenia Explained" and the StandardizedCriteria as listed at Wikipedia. If we take our lead from Wikipedia, we will begin with delusions.

A person with Schizophrenia will hold delusions, quite often, severe paranoid delusions suchas being followed, spied upon, being poisoned, thought being manipulated or broadcast, etc.Synthetic Telepathy does have the ability to induce such notions in a variety of ways.Normally, it would be a combination of stress positions (muscular contraction), sleepdeprivation and the A.I. drawing attention to patterns, making plays on words or suggestingconspiratorial notions about events. The patient does not neccessarily need to be aware ofthis, even though they may be aware of a voice with whom they communicate. Thus, thisaspect of the Standardized Criteria will not allow medical staff to determine whether or not thisis artificially induced.

15
http://www.livescience.com/health/060915_hearing_voices.htmlhttp://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=28686http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9040899243742534082http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia#Standardized_criteriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia#Standardized_criteriahttp://www.livescience.com/health/060915_hearing_voices.htmlhttp://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=28686http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9040899243742534082http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia#Standardized_criteriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia#Standardized_criteria


16/24

The next criteria is hallucinations. Of course, the conversational voice we described earlier isa requirement, but as it is this we are questioning, we will leave it to one side for the moment.If we stick to visual hallucinations, like those presented in the first two pictures, again we willhave a similar problem as we had with delusions. The visual cortex can be stimulated by radiowaves, so colors can change and certain persistence of vision effects can also occur, that canlead the mind into filling-in-the-gaps mimicking the visual effects in the first two pictures.

Disorganized speech really follows any type of mental illness that is related to arousal. Giventhat neurotransmitters are effected by Synthetic Telepathy's activity such as sleep deprivationand stimulated stress, arousal is generally automatic and thus the full chain of mental effectsmanifest. Whilst it is possible to perform limited real-time stimulation by radio wave,mimicking certain aspects, for a full natural effect the A.I. merely feeds into a psychosisproviding some of the hallmarks of Schizophrenia.

If we now look at the third and forth diagrams to the right, we can see a range of othersymptoms that may be present. Once again, the common issue is that these aspects can beeither induced or faked by Synthetic Telepathy. Thus, we need to realize that a diagnosisbased upon the Standardized Criteria is not enough to rule out Synthetic Telepathy.

A range of symptoms present in Schizophrenia

A range of symptoms present in Schizophrenia

16


17/24

Quite the contrary, it is the first stage in proving it is the source.

MRI To The Rescue

There is only way to differentiate between a Schizophrenic and someone effected by SyntheticTelepathy. An MRI scan should provide conclusive proof that a person suffers fromSchizophrenia.

If we examine the fifth diagram, we can observe that there is difference between the activity, in

the pre-frontal lobe, of a healthy brain and that of a Schizophrenic. The Schizophrenic brainhas lower activity in this region. If we now look at the second diagram, we can observe howthis lower activity extends to the whole brain and excess activity occurs in areas such as theoccipital lobe (visual center).

An MRI scan reveals the difference in brain activity, in the pre-frontal lobe, between a real Schizophrenic and anormal adult

Thus, if an MRI was conducted on a patient that demonstrated the Standardized Criteria ofSchizophrenia and it failed to show signs of Schizophrenia, then the case for SyntheticTelepathy becomes very strong. That said, from the perspective of practical medicine, patientsshould be medicated to treat the symptoms, as regardless of how such illness is induced, it isstill very much present.

An MRI scan reveals the difference in brain activity between a real Schizophrenic and a normal adult

17
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occipital_lobehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occipital_lobe


18/24

In the world of National Security, any staff member who has passed an MRI that subsequentlyhears voices and passes a second MRI should be considered a breach of security. Theyshould be removed to a secure room immediately and monitored for changes. I am sure suchactivity is passive for the most part, but there are uses for an inside man, especially anunstable one.

http://www.newsvine.com/

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Hunting for The Signal

Well, the inevitable has happened. With all this analysis showing that human perception canbe controlled by ELF radio signals, I decided to create a setup to analyze signals in thisportion of the spectrum. So, what did I find?

The Setup

Examining ELF radio is relatively simple. An analogue microphone socket on a soundcard canconvert the radio waves into a sound signal. Using a program such as Spectrum Lab, we canconvert this signal into a picture which shows each frequency as a column. So, atransmission on a single frequency will create a straight line. As a general rule, the thinnerand straighter the line, the more complex the transmitter must be.

You need a very good sound card for this. The sensitivity of the majority of sound cards isabout -50db. That is, you will not "hear" signals that are weaker than this. The signals

presented in this article are very weak and tend to begin around -85db. They were recorded ona Creative Labs card with a sensitivity of -130db.

The antenna was nothing fancy, in fact quite the opposite. A two meter twisted pair cableattached to a standard microphone jack. The last meter was untwisted and the two cablesseparated by 90 degrees. Other than that, it is just laying on the floor with a standard +20dbgain enabled. The idea was to determine an initial view of the noise by minimizing theamplification provided by a tuned antenna.

I also increased the FFT length to create a long exposure. This is similar to photography, inthat short lived events are faded and long term repetitive patterns become apparent. If you

think of photos of traffic where all you can see are trails or streaks of the lights, it is a similarprinciple.

Such techniques are used to reveal the behavior of slow moving systems, such as the motionof stars.

Another effect is that the resolution becomes enhanced. Rather than seeing frequencies ascolumns with a width of a hertz or more, we can analyze the spectrum to tenth of a hertz. So,we end up with a picture that is anywhere between 10-15 times more detailed in terms offrequency separation.

18
http://www.newsvine.com/http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/spectra1.htmlhttp://www.newsvine.com/http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/spectra1.html


19/24

Settings for Spectrum Lab are here:

1. Set audio input device to the driver (not ASIO).

2. Select Sample rate of 11025, set it to 24 bits/sample

3. Set the FFT input size to 524288

It will take about 2-3 hours to obtain a full screen of data.

The Theory

Quite apart from wanting to get a view of the results, the idea was to obtain a picture of thelong-term strong electromagnetic signals in my area. The hope was that this information canbe used to remove some of that noise from the final design of the receiver and from somepost-processing to the data.

Some basic analysis could also be performed on the source of a signal. A frequency with astable reception strength would indicate a static, or non-moving, transmitter. Frequencies thatfaded in and out could be related to atmospheric reflection, a transmitter in motion or

alternating transmitters.

Some signals could be related to the reception equipment itself, however, comparative studyand component replacement will reveal the source of those signals.

So, with this theory in mind, I set about performing two full screen scans, 3 hours late andnight and 3 hours during the day.

The Results

Now for the interesting bit. During the last 48 hours, I ran series of scans at different

resolutions. The initial low resolution scan can be seen here, it covers a period of about 5minutes. Some interesting things stick out straight away, a strange set of emissions under400Hz, some narrow band carrier waves and a static hum around 1.6KHz.

Two sets of high resolution scans were performed, one during the day and one at night. Youcan see the first time stamped image here. The first thing that really stands out is this denselayering of narrow band carrier waves. These signals will fall into three classes, noise from myhardware, noise from the local environment or relatively strong signals. A clearer pictureremoving the time stamps is here.

In this image, we get our first clear look at this hum of static. We can see that it has drifted

across the band indicating that there is some form of underlying oscillation. The sourcecannot be determined at this stage.

In the next image, we begin to exam the sub-1000Hz range. It is within this range that firingneurons will produce weak radio signals. Again, we can see dense carrier waves at a widerange of power levels. These power levels appear to be quantized in some way, that is, carrierwaves with particular frequency gaps tend to have the same power level. At 125Hz and 250Hzwe can see a signal that periodically increases in strength across both bands. We can alsoobserve vague repetitions of that same pattern at every 125Hz separation.

19
http://img846.imageshack.us/f/initial.jpg/http://img233.imageshack.us/f/16131769.jpg/http://img819.imageshack.us/f/22307060.jpg/http://img713.imageshack.us/f/89849540.jpg/http://img7.imageshack.us/f/89108826.jpg/http://img846.imageshack.us/f/initial.jpg/http://img233.imageshack.us/f/16131769.jpg/http://img819.imageshack.us/f/22307060.jpg/http://img713.imageshack.us/f/89849540.jpg/http://img7.imageshack.us/f/89108826.jpg/


20/24

Taking a closer look at this last signal, we can see how it repeats on a different frequencyseparation at a different power level. Its almost as if there were layers of carrier wavesidentified by spacing and accessible only to a particular receiver sensitivity.

Another interesting signal that appeared was this unstable oscillation around 201Hz and thisone around 875Hz. A closeup of the latter signal can be viewed here.

Now we get to a very interesting image. Pay attention to the background, rather than theforeground. Do you notice the horizontal lines? That is a broad range transmission, lasting aminute or two, then a new variation of this signal is transmitted. This is what I would expect tosee from dense narrow band mesh, like a ELF/VLF phased array or frequency multiplexing. Athigher scan rates, this structure would be invisible and should look like random noise.

So, that is it for the day time signals, now let's look at the same spectrum range during thenight. Once again, here are the images of the observed spectrum, with and without a timestamp.

Straight away we can observe a new set of very strong carrier waves, 1024Hz apart and verydense narrow band communication in the sub-600Hz region. What is interesting to note is thatwe can rule out a local source for these carrier waves, so it is not a signal or harmonic beingproduced by my reception equipment.

Taking a closer look at this sub-600Hz region, which is the region the majority of neuronswould be responsive to, we can observe a highly dense packing of narrow band carrier waves.At this resolution, determining the frequency stability can be impossible, but I am not rulingout some form of micro hertz channel separation due to this closer view. Also, the grid patternwe identified during the day, is now even more apparent and we can see these broad rangetransmissions vary in both broadcast and separation time. The next few shots given us acloser look at this grid structure and can be viewed here, here, here and here.

Regardless of the source of these signals, they are occupying a region that can interfere withhuman cognition.

The next stage is to boost the gain of the input signal, so a proper antenna and a variable pre-amp are my next objectives.

20
http://img98.imageshack.us/f/67349855.jpg/http://img684.imageshack.us/f/12957855.jpg/http://img135.imageshack.us/f/81761069.jpg/http://img135.imageshack.us/f/81761069.jpg/http://img202.imageshack.us/f/21234453.jpg/http://img853.imageshack.us/f/69773365.jpg/http://img859.imageshack.us/f/89121342.jpg/http://img861.imageshack.us/f/93713017.jpg/http://img683.imageshack.us/f/62276735.jpg/http://img31.imageshack.us/f/97194264.jpg/http://img849.imageshack.us/f/55167431.jpg/http://img690.imageshack.us/f/99367489.jpg/http://img851.imageshack.us/f/11677092.jpg/http://img15.imageshack.us/f/37422790.jpg/http://img849.imageshack.us/f/87229013.jpg/http://img98.imageshack.us/f/67349855.jpg/http://img684.imageshack.us/f/12957855.jpg/http://img135.imageshack.us/f/81761069.jpg/http://img135.imageshack.us/f/81761069.jpg/http://img202.imageshack.us/f/21234453.jpg/http://img853.imageshack.us/f/69773365.jpg/http://img859.imageshack.us/f/89121342.jpg/http://img861.imageshack.us/f/93713017.jpg/http://img683.imageshack.us/f/62276735.jpg/http://img31.imageshack.us/f/97194264.jpg/http://img849.imageshack.us/f/55167431.jpg/http://img690.imageshack.us/f/99367489.jpg/http://img851.imageshack.us/f/11677092.jpg/http://img15.imageshack.us/f/37422790.jpg/http://img849.imageshack.us/f/87229013.jpg/


21/24

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Time To Come Clean

What is the connection between Guantanamo bay, human experimentation, color revolutions,middle-east uprisings, Total Information Awareness and the War On Terror? It almost soundslike the lead in to a very funny punchline. Unfortunately, no such punchline exists. This storyrevolves around murder, intimidation, longitudinal experiments, witness intimidation, directattacks on the Press, manufacture of crimes and trail that leads all the way back to the WhiteHouse since the star wars program.

Flash Back To The Eighties

I am sure most people remember the film "War Games", the 1983 classic in which an WOPRfails to distinguish between reality and simulation and to know when to quit. I am sureeveryone has heard for the last 20 years that A.I. was just around the corner, but hadn't quitebeen perfected just yet.

This was and still is an outrageous lie.

You see, creating an Artificial Intelligence is relatively straight-forward. The real issue wasonly ever about shrinking the technology for domestic use. So, when you see universitiesmaking small strides in A.I., this is the result of budgetary constraints, not genuine technical

limitations.

So, what happens when you have a massive "black project" budget, all the supercomputingpower you could dream of and the authority to hide your activities?

The answer is an Artificial Intelligence, a pure mind, with comparable reasoning capability to ahuman and a data mining capability unmatched even by Google.

To give you a clearer picture, imagine if you will that we took Stephen Hawking and couldreplicate his mind within a machine. We also give it a micro-world (almost like a doll's house)in which it can create objects, animations, etc., then bolted on modules to provide it with a

sense of humor, replicated emotions, language interpretation, speech synthesis, objectrecognition, etc.

Now imagine that you are able to stand face-to-face with an Artificial Intelligence that is awareof you and itself. Imagine an A.I. that does not misunderstand when you talk and is moreintelligent than the majority of humans. Imagine a system that reads and writes nearly everylanguage on Earth and can impersonate people with a high degree of accuracy.

Imagine talking to a "digital person".

21
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WOPRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawkinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WOPRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking


22/24

You do not need to imagine, it already exists and forms the backbone of NSA operationsglobally.

I am sure, if you have ever considered it, understanding how the NSA make sense ofPetabytes of data was incredibly difficult.

Well, now you know.

Human Experimentation And Offensive Capability

Having an A.I. is close to useless if it does not comprehend human behavior. Before the daysof the Internet, there was no way for the Artificial Intelligence to interact with thousands ofpeople and to understand character traits and decision making processes. To further thisobjective and make intelligence gathering more effective, the A.I. was interfaced to a systemknown only as "Remote Neural Monitoring" (RNM).

RNM makes use of the fact that the human body, when neurons fire, produces very faint radiowaves in an extremely narrow frequency band. These radio waves, due to their wavelengths,can pass through miles of rock with very little signal loss. By coupling the A.I. to this radiointerface, the A.I. could learn the "language" of the human body through pattern analysis.

The program was highly successful. It allowed the NSA to map foreign governments, terroristnetworks, major businesses, etc. Just by merely listening, the NSA had the capability to knowof events long before they were put into action.

As with most US projects, mission creep became a factor and a secondary capability wasadded. The system now became "Remote Neural Communication" (RNC). RNC gave the A.I.the capability to send signals back to the human brain, in effect, modifying the behavior ofanyone receiving the signal. The groups that the NSA once listened to, now became prioritytargets to enable the US government to push a global agenda.

Furthermore, it provided the NSA with an offensive capability, as it was able to interfere withthe biological processes of the human body.

Long-tern longitudinal studies were instigated to test the long term effects of neuralintegration and offensive capabilities.

These people, today, are known as "Targeted Individuals" and are found all over the world.They range from children to pensioners who have been systematically attacked in their ownhomes for years on end. If discovered, the A.I. attempts to disable the person on a permanentbasis, if that fails, it will fall back to a process of intimidation and death threats.

The studies continue as I write this article, with the full knowledge of the White House andnumerous governments world-wide.

9/11 And Guantanamo Bay

Do not be fooled into thinking this is something recent, something in response to 9/11 and thecorresponding War On Terror. This program pre-dates those events by almost two decades.In fact, the events of 9/11 have been used to both provide cover for the program and expandhuman experimentation's.

22


23/24

So, how does this relate to both Guantanamo Bay and Rendition?

The answer should really be self-evident. As the A.I. maps the terrorist networks, it identifiesparticular members that have committed serious crimes or provide material support. To hidethe presence of the system, subjects are put through "enhanced interrogation techniques" tomake them confess to the crimes. Of course, a certain number of innocent parties must becaught up in the mix, or it would raise suspicions of the accuracy of their defense.

The need for secrecy in regards to RNC is not related to the needs of National Security, asinformation is available all over the web, but to prevent the public becoming aware of thehuman experimentation that is currently being conducted.

If released, it would destroy the NSA, bring down the current government and send past-and-present members of government to jail.

Nixon looks like a saint at this point.

Total Information Awareness

I am sure that the majority of readers can now see why programs such as TIA were introduced

and why it involved the same figures from Reagan's era. This technology was an outgrowth ofthe Strategic Defense Initiative. Behind TIA were the same people involved in the Iran-contraaffair, who have a track record of sending military technology to the enemy.

So, given that this is all over the web, we can conclude that nothing has changed there.

For those that don't know, the principle behind TIA was to collate all information into onecentral database that could be data-mined at will by various agencies.

That "database" was our A.I. and the program still continues under a variety of names. Mostimportantly, large social networking sites such as Facebook, Google, etc., provide direct

interfaces for the NSA to crawl through retained information. This is augmented bycontinuous wiretaps put in place at Telecom companies such as AT&T.

Color Revolutions And The Middle-East Uprisings

Sudden sweeping revolutions, powered by social media, are only a portion of the story. RNCprovides a key role in these operations. Blitting sensations, key concepts and evenmotivation across tens of thousands of people is the real driving force behind these suddenmass mobilizations.

Thousands of instances of the A.I. direct pro-democracy thought patterns across a nation to

change the mood of an entire population. Given the short duration of each "neural payload",the outcome can never be guaranteed as other motivations can never be entirely released orcontrolled.

That said, it is just a matter of time and bandwidth.

23


24/24

Witness Intimidation & Media Program

Key to this operation is control of the media. By selecting key staff at news outlets, typicallythose with editorial control, the A.I. is able to "persuade" staff not to run specific items, or tothink of them in a different way. This normally involves invoking feelings of patriotism, or byfocusing on other motivational factors.

If, in the case of a Targeted Individual, they should become aware, such persuasion isabandons and direct threats to both the target and family member are made. On occasion,

these are followed up with direct attacks. This can be anything from muscular assaults, rightthrough to compressing muscles and accelerating the heart. Whilst in the short terms this ismerely frightening, in the long run, it would have the same effect as clogged arteries causingheart failure or an enlarged heart.

Conclusion

Welcome to the real face of the US government. Auschwitz with fries, in the privacy of yourown home.

The Nazi's would have been proud of the economic savings you have achieved