36
Cambi Corporate Presentation Joelcio Saturnino [email protected]

Cambi Corporate Presentation · Cambi Corporate Presentation Joelcio Saturnino [email protected]. Slide 2 ... AD Lead model Metric units Units Raw sludge dewatering Conventional

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Cambi Corporate Presentation

Joelcio Saturnino

[email protected]

Slide 2

FROM WASTE TO WORTH USING ADVANCED ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

THE CAMBI SOLUTION TURNS

PROBLEMS INTO PRODUCTS:

FROM WASTE TO WORTH

Slide 3

1989

(first trials with steam explosion)

1992 (Cambi

is founded)

1994 (contract

with HiAS)

1998 (Chertsey/

JV with Thames

Water, UK)

2000

(large-scale THP,

Dublin)

2005

(co-digestion of food waste)

2011 (biowaste plant in Oslo)

2011 (Washington DC contract)

2014 (China market

takes off)

2017

(US market takes off)

Cambi has more than 25 years experience

Slide 4

Today

65Plants

50Operational

15In Design

22Countries

5Continents

52%Repeat customers

11– 450 Range of plant size US ton DS/d

56%Of UK’s sludge production can be treated by

installed capacity of Cambi thermal hydrolysis

368Reactors

106Trains

6,955US ton dry solids/d

75MPopulation equivalents

in

Slide 5

Gaoantun, 2017

Huaifang, 2017

Quinghe II, 2017

Gaobeidian, 2016

Xiaohongmen, 2016

Cambi thermal hydrolysis – repeat clients

Basingstoke, 2017

Longreach, 2015

Crossness, 2014

Beckton, 2014

Crawley, 2014

Riverside, 2011

Chertsey, 1999

Five Fords, 2016

Cardiff, 2010

Afan, 2010

Edinburgh 2014

Bruxelles Nord, 2006

Leigh, 2016

Burnley, 2016

Davyhulme, 2011

Panama City, 2019

Santiago, 2012

Cotton Valley, 2008

Whitlingham, 2008

Howdon, 2012

Tees Valley, 2009

Major extension, 2008

Rings End, Dublin,2002

Ourense, 2015

Burgos, 2012

Vigo, 2009

acuaNorte

Oxley Creek Upgrade, 2018

Oxley Creek, 2007

Strongford, 2018

Minworth, 2017

Slide 6

Today, thermal hydrolysis is a standard technology

ETE

Bar

ue

ri, S

P,

BR

(1

2 m

³/s)

50 t DS/d

100 t DS/d

150 t DS/d

200 t DS/d

250 t DS/d

300 t DS/d

350 t DS/d

400 t DS/d

Slide 7

Thermal Hydrolysis Globally

All other suppliers

Over 2 million tonnes dry solids

processed annually

Market Share by installed capacity

Between 80 and 90 facilities

Slide 8

SEOUL – DUBLIN – OSLO – BRUSSELS – ATHENS

SANTIAGO DE CHILE – EDINBURGH – CARDIFF – AND 20+ OTHER CITIES

CAMBI SERVES A POPULATION OF MORE THAN 70 MILLION PEOPLE WORLD WIDE, > 20 YEARS

Slide 9

More than 20 years of continuous operation

for the first Cambi THP plant at HIAS WWTP, Hamar

Slide 10

References

Slide 11

• UK industry is fully privatized

• On stock exchange

• Shareholders and dividends

• United Utilities (UU) in 2018

• Revenue £ 1750 million (US$2300 million)

• Governed by financial regulator

OFWAT

• OFWAT control rates which can be

charged

Cambi in the UK

Slide 12

Cambi THP at Davyhulme, UKSludge center• Increased capacity of existing

digesters by nearly 2.5 times

• Allowed United Utilities to import and treat sludge from other treatment plants in north-west England and avoid building a planned new incinerator.

• The digestion plant serves a population equivalent of 3 million people

Slide 13

Cambi THP at Blue Plains WWTP in Washington DC (USA) – 4 million p.e.

• 4 digesters = 58 100 m3 (1/3 of traditional)

• Saved $200 million CAPEX vs traditional

• Saved >$20 mill in OPEX/year

• Generate 13 MW (net 10 MW) of clean, renewable power from the CHP

• PLANNED TRADITIONAL DESIGN• CAMBI SOLUTION

• 8 digesters = 174 000 m3 designed originally

CANCELLED TRADITIONAL DESIGN

NEW SOLUTION

CAMBI PROCESS

Slide 14

Cake production

[wet basis]

Before After

Bloom packaginghttp://bloomsoil.com/

Cambi THP at Blue Plains WWTP in Washington DC (USA) – 4 million p.e.

New

Class A

cake

Old Class B cake

Slide 15

FIVE CAMBI PLANTS IN BEIJING 4.2 million m3/d = 48,6 m3/s , 6000 t of wet sludge/day

GAOANTUN WWTP HUAIFANG WWTPGAOBEIDIAN WWTP

XIAOHONGMEN WWTP QINGHE II WWTP

Slide 16

Beijing Drainage Group (BDG) for Huaifang Water Reclamation Plant (HWRP) project for winning the IWA Gold Prize for category Exceptional Project Execution and Delivery at the International Water Association - World Water Congress 2018 at Tokyo – Japan. (16-21, September, 2018)

Madam Lin, the Chairman of BDG group: “The success of this award, belongs to BDG and Cambi'scooperation, we thank the two companies for their collaborative efforts to work together”.

FIVE CAMBI PLANTS IN BEIJING 4.2 million m3/d = 48,6 m3/s , 6000 t of wet sludge/day

Slide 17

CAMBI Converting food waste to biogas and fertilizer in 6 cities from Norway to South Korea

Slide 18

Why thermal hydrolysis?

It changes the properties of sludge at a fundamental level

(non-reversible reduction in viscosity)

Minimize or eliminate

spending on digester

upgrades

New digestion plants are

significantly smaller

Less Biosolids

exiting plant

Lower energy

requirements for

downstream processing

Improving dewaterability

Allowing higher loading

rates to digesters

In addition

Sterilization – Class A

Biosolids without

regrowth

Improved digestion

performance increases

biogas production

Minimized foaming

potential

Friable, minimum odor

homogenous cake

easy to spread on

standard agricultural

equipment

Reduced carbon

footprint

Slide 19

CAMBI

Where is CAMBI in a wwtp ?

CAMBI Solutions

steam

CAMBI Thermal Hydrolysis Process

Source: World Resources Institute, 2017

Slide 20

Influence of thermal hydrolysis on overall process

Primary

WAS

Thermal Hydrolysis

DewateringDewatering

Steam

demand

Class A

Less biosolids

No regrowth

Nutrient value

Return

Liquors

Less

digestion

Anaerobic

DigestionHigher dry

solids

More biogas

Higher dry

solids

Solubilisation

Lowest carbon

footprint

Slide 21

Value Propositions for using CAMBI technology

Slide 22

Reduce carbonfootprint

Slide 23

Why thermal hydrolysis to reduce carbon footprint?

MORE LESS&

Slide 24

Cambi thermal hydrolysis and carbon footprint

Slide 25

Carbon Footprint (Aecom/MOHURD China study)

Slide 26

Impact on carbon footprint

Highest Volatile

solids destruction

Better dewaterability

Better quality of

product

More renewable

energy

Less sludge

Less Transport and

downstream

processing

Less water in

biosolids cake

Lower energy

requirements for

thermal systems

Less sludgeLess transport to

land

Less land required

for reuseLess transport

Low

est

op

erat

ing

carb

on

foo

tpri

nt

Slide 27

Key:

Optimising sludge drying

Energy required

for drying

Energy available

from biogas

Need less energy

for drying

More energy from

biogas

Much greater

excess of energy

Basis: 100 tons dry solids/d

Slide 28

Summary - Theory

Without thermal hydrolysis• Nearly all consumed by drier

leaving little for other uses

With thermal hydrolysis• Nearly 20% more energy in

biogas

• 45% reduction in drying energy

demand

• Over 4 times more biogas can be

diverted to co-generation

Psytallia, Aktor

50 tonnes dry solids WAS/day

55% VSR: 31% DS dewatering

Slide 30

Psytallia – Energy Balance

Without thermal hydrolysis• 73% of biogas diverted to dryer

With WAS-only THP• 16% more biogas

• 40% lower gas demand for dryer

• Energy required for steam met by

High Grade Heat

• 160% more biogas available for

co-generation

Slide 31

Project : X

Client : Y

Consultant :

Date : 10/10/2018

Cambi responsible :

Country : BRASIL

AD Lead model

Metric units UnitsRaw sludge

dewatering

Conventional

digestion

Cambi THP

advanced

digestion

Sludge design data

Primary Sludge tonDS/day 15,0 15,0 15,0

Secondary Sludge tonDS/day 20,0 20,0 20,0

Other tonDS/day 15,0 15,0 15,0

Total dry solids (DS) tonDS/day 50,0 50,0 50,0

Digester performance

Dry solids to digester tonDS/day - 50 50

%DS to digesters % - 3,5% 10,0%

Hydraulic retention time day - 20 15

Required digester volume m³ - 28.383 7500 -20883 -74%

Residual dry solids tonDS/year - 12.484 11.193 -1291 -10%

Energy production

Daily biogas production Nm³biogas/day - 13.349 17.347 3.998 30%

Electricity production MWh/year - 12.015 13.958 1942 16%

Dewatering

Cake dry solids % 20% 22% 32%

Sludge to disposal tDS/yr 17.338 11.860 10.633 -1227 -10% -39%

Sludge to disposal ton/year 86.688 53.910 33.229 -20.681 -38% -62%

Difference

ConvAD Vs. THP

Case Study

Slide 32

ECONOMIC DATA - Assumptions used Reais Euro

Polymer cost 15,00R$ 3,49€ €/kgA.P.

Electricity price, buying (replacement cost) : 250,00R$ 58,14€ €/MWh

Electricity price, selling, green energy : 250,00R$ 58,14€ €/MWh

Disposal cost (Raw & Conv cake) 220,00R$ 51,16€ €/ton

Disposal cost (Cambi cake) 220,00R$ 51,16€ €/ton

Potable water 10,00R$ 2,33€ €/ton

Case Study

Dewatering Raw Conventional Cambi AD

Cake dry solids % 20% 22% 32%

Slide 33

ECONOMIC DATA - Assumptions used Reais Euro

Polymer cost 15,00R$ 3,49€ €/kgA.P.

Electricity price, buying (replacement cost) : 250,00R$ 58,14€ €/MWh

Electricity price, selling, green energy : 250,00R$ 58,14€ €/MWh

Disposal cost (Raw & Conv cake) 220,00R$ 51,16€ €/ton

Disposal cost (Cambi cake) 220,00R$ 51,16€ €/ton

Potable water 10,00R$ 2,33€ €/ton

Case Study

Dewatering Raw Conventional Cambi AD

Cake dry solids % 20% 22% 32%

Slide 34

Preliminary OPEX & CAPEX analysis Units

DEWATERING

of raw sludge

CONVENTIONAL

(Meso AD)

CAMBI THP

Polymer (Thick./pre-dewat./post-dewat.) €/y 509.302 653.985 656.992

Potable Water for steam production €/y - - 42.442 -

Electricity production - Sold €/y - 698.572 - 811.506 -

Power consumption - Purchased €/y 58.416 130.326 147.331

Maintenance €/y - 158.377 178.660

Sludge disposal €/y 4.435.174 2.758.195 1.700.113

Total OPEX €/y 5.061.309 3.132.637 1.976.480

Total CAPEX €/y - 15.003.448 11.258.009

Capex + 20 Opex € 101.226.177 77.656.187 50.787.609

Delta (- means savings) € 26.868.578 - -35%

50.438.568 - -50%

Simplified OPEX analysis : (+) costs & (-) revenues

CAPEX (estimation) on differentiating equipmentDigestion (equipped - except heat exchangers), Cogeneration, THP+PGU+Steam boiler, PS Thickening, WAS Thickening +

instalation/piping, Pre Dewatering + instalation/piping, Thermal Drying, Coolers/heaters, THP installation/piping, Post Dewatering +

instalation/piping

Case Study

Capex + 20 Opex R$ 455.517.798 349.452.841 228.544.240

Delta (- means savings) R$ 120.908.600 -

226.973.558 -

Slide 35

Electric Energy or upgrade to Biomethane

Dry sludge using waste energy from

CHP

Pathogen free solids to

agriculture

Carbon footprint credits

Case Study

To consider:

Slide 36

Power from the People – with CAMBITHANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION QUESTIONS?

Follow Us on www.cambi.comCambi Academy