Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
1
CAL/OPS m
eetings
M. Kirsch ESA/ESOC
with input from the XMM FCT
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
2
menu
�sp
ace
cra
ft s
tatu
s &
mis
sio
n p
erf
orm
an
ce
�sp
ecia
l e
ve
nts
�o
utl
oo
k
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
3
solar arrays
�p
ow
er
ge
ne
rati
on
ca
pa
bil
itie
s a
re n
orm
al
�n
o s
ign
of
un
ex
pe
cte
d d
eg
rad
ati
on
vis
ible A
ctua
l
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
4
fuel
Rem
ain
ing
fu
el65
. [kg
]
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n la
st
12 m
on
th6.
2 [k
g]
aver
age
fuel
co
nsu
mp
tio
n
(sin
ce 2
003-
03-0
1)
0.48
[k
g/m
onth
]
resi
du
al li
feti
me
in
mo
nth
97 [-
]
extr
apo
late
d m
ilag
eF
eb.
2020
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
5
LCL statistics
2012
:•0
2-01
-201
2: H
LCL
4.2A
trip
off
(pow
ers
2 he
ater
s of
the
mai
n br
anch
oft
he E
PIC
an
d R
GS
ele
ctro
nics
.)•2
012-
01-2
5: H
LCL
ST
A P
AN
B tr
ip o
ff (p
ower
s re
dund
ant I
MU
/RW
hea
ters
)
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
6
spacecraft/mission status
Money
Fu
nd
ed
un
til
ne
xt
ex
ten
sio
n r
eq
ue
st
En
d 2
01
2/1
4in
20
12�
20
16
Fuel
rem
ain
ing
Use
pe
r y
ea
r
Mil
ea
ge
le
ft
65
kg
6 k
g
�2
02
0
Solar array power
Ma
xim
um
re
qu
ire
d
Cu
rre
nt
ma
rgin
Ma
rgin
en
d o
f 2
01
8
13
50
W
54
5 W
35
0 W
Battery
Acco
rdin
g t
o U
HB
15
+ y
Gyros/(IMUs)
Usa
ge
< 2
0 %
Reaction wheels
Usa
ge
< 4
4 %
RF switches
Transponder switches
Usa
ge
Stu
ck
at
on
e p
osit
ion
Ba
ck
up
no
t u
se
d
inste
ad
tra
nsp
on
de
rs a
re s
wit
ch
ed
TX
A L
CL
sw
itch
es
58
4
TX
B L
CL
sw
itch
es
59
5(Q
ua
lifi
ed
to
25
00
0)
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
7
mission performance
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
8
eclipse winter/spring 2011/2
�1
5/1
2-1
0/0
1
�m
ax
. d
isch
arg
e d
ura
tio
n:
0h
55
m5
5s
�M
ax
. D
ep
th o
f D
isch
arg
e:
17
.2 %
(1
00
%=
35
Ah
)
�A
uto
ma
ted
TT
ge
ne
rati
on
no
w f
ull
y o
pe
rati
on
al
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
9
special events
�Collision avoidance i
n p
lace
(N
ov
em
be
r 2
01
1 –
Ma
rch
20
12
)
�R
ea
cti
on
wh
ee
l cage instability
: •
XM
M_
SC
-72
, 2
01
1-0
8-1
6,
Re
acti
on
Wh
ee
l 1
un
ex
pe
cte
d i
ncre
ase
in
to
rqu
e a
nd
cu
rre
nt
du
rin
g s
tab
le p
oin
tin
g
•S
wit
ch
of
rea
cti
on
wh
ee
l co
nfi
gu
rati
on
fro
m 1
-2-3
to
2-3
-4 i
n D
ece
mb
er
20
11
�4WD project
•W
he
el4
teste
d u
p t
o 3
75
0 r
pm
in
Ju
ly
�MCS m
igration
�Fuel migration
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
10
collision avoidance
�X
MM
orb
it c
rossin
g G
EO
fo
r a
pe
rio
d o
f ~
5 m
on
th
�C
on
jun
cti
on
mo
nit
ori
ng
in
pla
ce
an
d p
roce
du
re f
or
co
llis
ion
av
oid
an
ce
ma
ne
uv
er
�D
ete
cte
d c
on
jun
cti
on
s (
Scre
en
ing
Vo
lum
e:
30
0k
m x
30
0k
m x
30
0k
m):
9
�N
o n
ee
d f
or
ma
ne
uv
er
so
fa
r (b
elo
w 2
0 k
m)
�O
bje
cts
: R
ock
et
bo
die
s (
3),
Ro
ck
et
bo
dy
de
b.
(3),
Sp
ace
cra
ft (
3)
Miss distance [km]
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
11
cage instability: symptoms �
RW
1 c
om
ma
nd
ed
to
rqu
e a
nd
R
WD
E1
cu
rre
nt
so
me
tim
es d
uri
ng
sta
ble
po
inti
ng
su
ffe
rs a
ju
mp
�T
he
re
aso
n f
or
the
se
ju
mp
s i
s
mo
st
pro
ba
bly
a s
ud
de
n i
ncre
me
nt
of
the
be
ari
ng
fri
cti
on
le
ve
l.
�W
ell k
no
wn
ph
en
om
en
a w
ith
b
ea
rin
gs r
un
nin
g i
n m
arg
ina
lly
lu
bri
ca
ted
re
gim
es
�C
ha
oti
c v
ibra
tio
n o
f ca
ge
�C
au
se
d b
y t
oo
mu
ch
or
too
lit
tle
o
il
(la
te i
n t
he
mis
sio
n c
an
on
ly
be
du
e t
o r
ed
ucti
on
in
oil q
ua
nti
ty)
�V
ibra
tio
n c
au
se
s i
ncre
ase
d
fric
tio
n,
ca
use
s b
ea
rin
g t
o r
un
h
ott
er,
oil g
ets
th
inn
er
an
d g
ets
e
jecte
d f
rom
be
ari
ng
as m
icro
d
rop
lets
, o
il r
un
s h
ott
er,
oil s
tart
s
to d
eg
rad
e,
lig
hte
r fa
ts b
oil o
ff,
oil
run
s h
ott
er,
oil d
eg
rad
es f
urt
he
r,
oil r
un
s h
ott
er,
mo
re c
om
ple
x f
ats
b
oil o
ff,
be
ari
ng
ru
ns h
ott
er,
b
ea
rin
g f
ail
s
wheel 1 wheel 2
wheel 3
Tim
e [DOY 2010]
Torque [Nm]
310 331
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
12
cage instability: analysis
�S
cre
en
da
ta f
or
no
n s
lew
an
d n
on
RW
B t
ime
s
�P
rod
uce
mo
nth
ly h
isto
gra
ms o
f co
mm
an
de
d t
orq
ue
�F
irst
pe
ak
sh
ow
s n
om
ina
l to
rqu
e d
istr
ibu
tio
n
�If
th
ere
is s
eco
nd
pe
ak
, th
is s
ho
ws c
ag
e i
nsta
bilit
y
�H
eig
ht/
inte
gra
l o
f se
co
nd
pe
ak
giv
es i
nd
ica
tio
n o
f a
mo
un
t o
f ca
gin
g
�D
iffe
ren
ce
of
pe
ak
po
sit
ion
be
twe
en
1st
an
d 2
nd
pe
ak
giv
es s
tre
ng
th o
f ca
gin
g
no cage instability
2006/09
cage instability RW1
2010/11
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
13
cage instability analysis -
evolution
�a
na
lysis
of
his
tog
ram
plo
ts f
or
ea
ch
mo
nth
fro
m 2
00
5 u
nti
l n
ow
�cle
ar
on
-se
t o
f ca
ge
in
sta
bilit
y
in 2
00
8
�e
vo
luti
on
ov
er
the
la
st
2 y
ea
rs
sh
ow
s n
o s
ign
ific
an
t fu
rth
er
de
gra
da
tio
n
peakmax peak position
no caging peak
caging peak
caging peak
no caging peak
wheel1
wheel2
wheel3
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
14
cage instability analysis –
butterfly plots
�P
lott
ing
wh
ee
l sp
ee
d v
ers
us
torq
ue
in
dic
ate
s i
f th
e c
ag
e i
nsta
bilit
y
is p
rese
nt
for
all
wh
ee
l sp
ee
ds
�F
or
hig
he
r sp
ee
ds
the
fa
cto
r in
to
rqu
e
incre
ase
du
rin
g t
he
ca
gin
g s
tate
do
es
fla
tte
n o
ff
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
15
cage instability: actions taken
�A
SU
re
co
mm
en
de
d t
o g
o A
SA
P f
rom
wh
ee
l 1
-2-3
to
2-3
-4 c
on
tro
l
�A
fte
r te
sti
ng
on
th
e s
imu
lato
r w
he
el
1 h
as b
ee
n s
wit
ch
ed
of
an
d w
he
el
4 h
as b
ee
n
pu
t in
to c
on
tro
l
•F
/D c
on
fig
ura
tio
n c
on
tro
l is
su
e i
n c
om
bin
ati
on
wit
h F
/D d
esig
n i
ssu
e a
nd
TO
O r
eq
ue
st
ca
use
d a
n E
SA
M
en
try
so
me
da
ys l
ate
r
�W
he
el
1 i
s n
ow
wa
itin
g f
or
“re
-lu
bri
ca
tio
n”:
ea
ch
re
acti
on
wh
ee
l h
as a
n o
il
rese
rvo
ir,
tha
t a
llo
ws i
nje
cti
ng
oil i
n t
he
be
ari
ng
. T
his
sh
ou
ldcu
re t
he
ca
ge
in
sta
bilit
y
�C
urr
en
tly
Astr
ium
/Bra
dfo
rd i
n c
om
bin
ati
on
wit
h E
SO
C a
re
wo
rkin
g o
n a
pro
ce
du
re t
o p
erf
orm
th
is r
e-l
ub
rica
tio
n
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
16
cage instability m
onitoring
�C
om
pa
rin
g t
he
pre
dic
ted
to
rqu
e
as a
fu
ncti
on
of
wh
ee
l sp
ee
d
wit
h t
he
actu
al
sp
ee
d o
ve
r ti
me
in
dic
ate
s w
he
n a
wh
ee
l is
in
ca
gin
g s
tag
e
�T
his
me
tho
d c
an
be
use
d n
ea
r re
al
tim
e
�W
eig
hti
ng
ca
ge
sta
tes w
ith
1
an
d o
ne
ca
ge
sta
ge
s w
ith
0
giv
es a
s w
ell t
he
ca
ge
fra
cti
on
in
a c
ert
ain
tim
e i
nte
rva
l
�T
his
me
tho
d i
s b
ee
n
imp
lem
en
ted
to
mo
nit
or
�D
eri
ve
d p
ara
me
ter
imp
lem
en
ted
on
MC
Ss
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
17
fuel saving options
�4WD
: p
ote
nti
al
for
50
% o
f fu
el
sa
vin
g a
cco
rdin
g t
o F
/D e
sti
ma
tes
•F
ea
sib
ilit
y p
ha
se
1 h
as b
ee
n k
ick
ed
off
Se
pte
mb
er
20
11
wit
h A
str
ium
•A
lgo
rith
ms:
-2
ne
w m
od
es (
TC
M4
W,
IPS
4W
)
-S
lig
ht
mo
dif
ica
tio
n o
n A
MD
-T
BD
: ch
eck
ES
AM
an
d F
DIR
•S
/W -T
he
av
era
ge
pro
ce
sso
r lo
ad
is e
sti
ma
ted
to
in
cre
ase
by
< 1
%
-F
rom
a R
AM
me
mo
ry p
oin
t o
f v
iew
, a
bo
ut
~ 2
30
0 w
ord
s w
ill
be
re
qu
ire
d b
y t
he
n
ew
(8
00
0 w
ord
s s
till
av
ail
ab
le)
•C
ost
an
d s
ch
ed
ule
fo
r P
ha
se
2 (
imp
lem
en
tati
on
) w
ill
be
av
ail
ab
leb
y m
id A
pri
l
•D
ecis
ion
at
ME
OR
28
/06
�Reduction of wheel speed lim
its a
rou
nd
0 f
rom
20
0 r
pm
to
65
rp
m
�Flexible Perigee attitude
: d
ela
ye
d u
nti
l e
nd
of
co
llis
ion
mo
nit
ori
ng
, sin
ce
fix
ed
att
itu
de
is
req
uir
ed
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
18
MCS m
igration
�M
issio
n C
on
tro
l S
yste
m H
/W h
as r
ea
ch
ed
its
en
d
of
life
su
pp
ort
�M
igra
tio
n p
roce
ss h
as b
ee
n s
tart
ed
•M
igra
tio
n t
o S
ola
ris 1
0 u
sin
g H
/P T
4 s
erv
er
•V
irtu
aliza
tio
n o
f C
lie
nts
an
d S
erv
ers
•M
igra
tio
n i
n p
ara
lle
l w
ith
IN
TE
GR
AL
•E
nd
of
pro
ce
ss i
n 2
01
3
•W
ill
mig
rate
as w
ell t
he
Ba
ck
Up
sy
ste
m a
t R
ed
u w
hile
m
ov
ing
it
to E
SA
C/C
eb
rero
s (
TB
D)
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
19
fuel migration
�D
esig
n o
f T
an
k s
yste
m o
f X
MM
re
qu
ire
s f
ue
l m
igra
tio
n f
rom
a
ux
ilia
ry t
an
ks t
o m
ain
ta
nk
at
ne
ar
de
ple
tio
n s
tatu
s (
38
kg
le
ft)
�F
ue
l m
igra
tio
n w
ill
be
p
erf
orm
ed
by
te
mp
era
ture
d
elt
a b
etw
ee
n m
ain
ta
nk
an
d
au
x t
an
ks (
De
lta
T =
8-1
1 K
)
�F
irst
mig
rati
on
pro
ce
ss p
lan
ne
d
for
20
15
(3
WD
)
�M
igra
tio
n p
roce
ss n
ee
ds t
o b
e
rep
ea
ted
aft
er
usa
ge
of
8 k
g (
1
pe
r y
ea
r 4
WD
, ½
ye
ar
wit
h
3W
D)
Tank1
Tank2
Tank3
Tank4
2+2+2+2
XM
M-N
ew
ton
|E
SA
/ES
OC
| H
SO
-OA
X |
Pa
ge
20
outlook
�Astrium
final presentation for XMM 4WD 17/04
�UG m
eeting 19/04
�Mission Extension Operations Review 28/06
�MCS m
igration with finalization early 2013
�Wheel-1 re-lubrication in Summer
�Fuel Migration “dry-run”☺ ☺☺☺in autumn
![A comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods ... · BGP 01/08/2017 Bifurcation TBD TBD TBD Noj [57] scanpy 09/08/2017 Bifurcation TBD TBD TBD Noj [58] B-RGPs 01/09/2017](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5faef63686c74474a31efbdd/a-comparison-of-single-cell-trajectory-inference-methods-bgp-01082017-bifurcation.jpg)