7
322 0962-8924/00/$ – see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. trends in CELL BIOLOGY (Vol. 10) August 2000 PII: S0962-8924(00)01800-6 Calcium (as Ca 21 ) is an element that is crucial for numerous biological functions. In many organisms, the vast majority of Ca 21 is complexed with phos- phates to form exo- or endoskeletons that not only serve as structural scaffolds but also buffer the levels of Ca 21 within extracellular fluids at ~10 23 M. By contrast, the resting concentrations of intracellular free Ca 21 (~10 27 M) is 10 4 times lower than that out- side cells, providing the potential for the ready import of Ca 21 into cells, where it can act as a second messenger. Various extracellular stimuli promote the move- ment of Ca 21 either from outside the cell (via plasma-membrane Ca 21 channels) or from intracellular stores into the intracellular milieu (Fig. 1a). The Ca 21 is released in elemental aliquots called sparks, puffs or waves depending on the extent of the intra- cellular area covered. This free Ca 21 is only briefly available to act as a cellular signal, however, because Ca 21 -binding proteins and Ca 21 pumps immediately combine to sequester and transport it to intracellular storage sites or outside the cell. The short pulses of Ca 21 exert specific changes in cellular function depending on their route of entry into the cell, their local sites of action and, finally, by their pattern of modulation. The particular mem- brane channel or intracellular receptor responsible for the release of Ca 21 exerts considerable influence on the eventual effects of the Ca 21 signal 1 . The mode of cellular entry also influences the site of action of the Ca 21 signal. Hence, separate intracellular loci or organelles are potentially distinct compartments of localized Ca 21 signalling 2 (Fig. 1a). Therefore, Ca 21 signals in the nucleus exert different effects from those generated in the cytoplasm or near the plasma membrane of the same cell 3 . Additionally, the modulation of the amplitude or frequency of Ca 21 spikes (AM and FM, respectively) encodes important signalling information 4 . This has recently been illustrated for cases in which an optimal frequency of intracellular Ca 21 oscillations is important for the expression of different genes 5 . Calcium-regulated proteins: calmodulin How do Ca 21 signals produce changes in cell func- tion? The information encoded in transient Ca 21 signals is deciphered by various intracellular Ca 21 - binding proteins that convert the signals into a wide variety of biochemical changes. Some of these proteins, such as protein kinase C, bind to Ca 21 and are directly regulated in a Ca 21 -dependent manner. Other Ca 21 -binding proteins, however, are inter- mediaries that couple the Ca 21 signals to biochemical and cellular changes (Fig. 1b). Among this latter group are a family of proteins that is distinguished by a structural motif known as the E–F hand. An E–F hand consists of an N-terminal helix (the E helix) immediately followed by a centrally located, Ca 21 - coordinating loop and a C-terminal helix (the F helix). The three-dimensional arrangement of these domains is reminiscent of the thumb, index and middle fingers of a hand, hence the name ‘E–F hand’. These proteins respond to Ca 21 in one of two ways (Fig. 1b). One group (e.g. parvalbumin and calbindin) do not undergo a significant change in confor- mation on binding Ca 21 and function as Ca 21 buffers or Ca 21 transporters. The second group, the Ca 21 sensors, undergo a Ca 21 -induced change in confor- mation 6 . The most prominent examples of sensors include troponin C (a protein dedicated to regu- lating striated-muscle contraction), the multifunc- tional Ca 21 transducer calmodulin (CaM), the S100 family of proteins and, most recently, the neuronal myristoylated proteins such as recoverin 7 . The molecular and cellular mechanisms under- lying the ability of a majority of the Ca 21 -sensor proteins to integrate Ca 21 signals into specific cellular responses are not clearly understood. Much of what we do know about the mechanisms that the sensor proteins use to transduce Ca 21 signals is based on information gained from CaM, probably the most intensively studied member of the E–F-hand family of sensors. In the remainder of this article, CaM will therefore serve as a model or prototype for other potential Ca 21 transducers. A review of some of the mechanisms responsible for regulating CaM at the subcellular and molecular levels might reveal valuable clues as to how Ca 21 -sensor proteins convert Ca 21 signals into cellular function. CaM is expressed in all eukaryotic cells where it participates in signalling pathways that regulate many crucial processes such as growth, proliferation and movement. It is relatively small (vertebrate CaM Calmodulin: a prototypical calcium sensor David Chin and Anthony R. Means Calmodulin is the best studied and prototypical example of the E–F-hand family of Ca 21 -sensing proteins. Changes in intracellular Ca 21 concentration regulate calmodulin in three distinct ways. First, at the cellular level, by directing its subcellular distribution. Second, at the molecular level, by promoting different modes of association with many target proteins. Third, by directing a variety of conformational states in calmodulin that result in target-specific activation. The calmodulin-dependent regulation of protein kinases illustrates the potential mechanisms by which Ca 21 -sensing proteins can recognize and generate affinity and specificity for effectors in a Ca 21 -dependent manner. The authors are in the Dept of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. E-mail: chin0001@ mc.duke.edu; means001@ mc.duke.edu reviews

calmodulin-ticb10(322)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

6hy

Citation preview

  • 322 0962-8924/00/$ see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. trends in CELL BIOLOGY (Vol. 10) August 2000PII: S0962-8924(00)01800-6

    Calcium (as Ca21) is an element that is crucial fornumerous biological functions. In many organisms,the vast majority of Ca21 is complexed with phos-phates to form exo- or endoskeletons that not onlyserve as structural scaffolds but also buffer the levelsof Ca21 within extracellular fluids at ~1023 M. Bycontrast, the resting concentrations of intracellularfree Ca21 (~1027 M) is 104 times lower than that out-side cells, providing the potential for the ready import of Ca21 into cells, where it can act as a secondmessenger.

    Various extracellular stimuli promote the move-ment of Ca21 either from outside the cell (viaplasma-membrane Ca21 channels) or from intracellularstores into the intracellular milieu (Fig. 1a). TheCa21 is released in elemental aliquots called sparks,puffs or waves depending on the extent of the intra-cellular area covered. This free Ca21 is only brieflyavailable to act as a cellular signal, however, becauseCa21-binding proteins and Ca21 pumps immediatelycombine to sequester and transport it to intracellularstorage sites or outside the cell.

    The short pulses of Ca21 exert specific changes incellular function depending on their route of entryinto the cell, their local sites of action and, finally, bytheir pattern of modulation. The particular mem-brane channel or intracellular receptor responsiblefor the release of Ca21 exerts considerable influenceon the eventual effects of the Ca21 signal1. The modeof cellular entry also influences the site of action of

    the Ca21 signal. Hence, separate intracellular loci ororganelles are potentially distinct compartments oflocalized Ca21 signalling2 (Fig. 1a). Therefore, Ca21

    signals in the nucleus exert different effects fromthose generated in the cytoplasm or near the plasmamembrane of the same cell3. Additionally, themodulation of the amplitude or frequency of Ca21

    spikes (AM and FM, respectively) encodes important signalling information4. This has recently been illustrated for cases in which an optimal frequencyof intracellular Ca21 oscillations is important for theexpression of different genes5.

    Calcium-regulated proteins: calmodulinHow do Ca21 signals produce changes in cell func-

    tion? The information encoded in transient Ca21

    signals is deciphered by various intracellular Ca21-binding proteins that convert the signals into a widevariety of biochemical changes. Some of these proteins, such as protein kinase C, bind to Ca21 andare directly regulated in a Ca21-dependent manner.Other Ca21-binding proteins, however, are inter-mediaries that couple the Ca21 signals to biochemicaland cellular changes (Fig. 1b). Among this lattergroup are a family of proteins that is distinguishedby a structural motif known as the EF hand. An EFhand consists of an N-terminal helix (the E helix)immediately followed by a centrally located, Ca21-coordinating loop and a C-terminal helix (the F helix). The three-dimensional arrangement ofthese domains is reminiscent of the thumb, indexand middle fingers of a hand, hence the name EFhand.

    These proteins respond to Ca21 in one of two ways(Fig. 1b). One group (e.g. parvalbumin and calbindin)do not undergo a significant change in confor-mation on binding Ca21 and function as Ca21 buffersor Ca21 transporters. The second group, the Ca21

    sensors, undergo a Ca21-induced change in confor-mation6. The most prominent examples of sensorsinclude troponin C (a protein dedicated to regu-lating striated-muscle contraction), the multifunc-tional Ca21 transducer calmodulin (CaM), the S100family of proteins and, most recently, the neuronalmyristoylated proteins such as recoverin7.

    The molecular and cellular mechanisms under-lying the ability of a majority of the Ca21-sensor proteins to integrate Ca21 signals into specific cellularresponses are not clearly understood. Much of whatwe do know about the mechanisms that the sensorproteins use to transduce Ca21 signals is based on information gained from CaM, probably the mostintensively studied member of the EF-hand familyof sensors. In the remainder of this article, CaM willtherefore serve as a model or prototype for other potential Ca21 transducers. A review of some of themechanisms responsible for regulating CaM at thesubcellular and molecular levels might reveal valuableclues as to how Ca21-sensor proteins convert Ca21

    signals into cellular function.CaM is expressed in all eukaryotic cells where it

    participates in signalling pathways that regulatemany crucial processes such as growth, proliferationand movement. It is relatively small (vertebrate CaM

    Calmodulin: aprototypical

    calcium sensorDavid Chin and Anthony R. Means

    Calmodulin is the best studied and prototypical example of the

    EF-hand family of Ca21-sensing proteins. Changes in

    intracellular Ca21 concentration regulate calmodulin in three

    distinct ways. First, at the cellular level, by directing its

    subcellular distribution. Second, at the molecular level, by

    promoting different modes of association with many target

    proteins. Third, by directing a variety of conformational states in

    calmodulin that result in target-specific activation. The

    calmodulin-dependent regulation of protein kinases illustrates the

    potential mechanisms by which Ca21-sensing proteins can

    recognize and generate affinity and specificity for effectors in a

    Ca21-dependent manner.

    The authors are inthe Dept of

    Pharmacologyand Cancer

    Biology, DukeUniversity Medical

    Center, Durham,NC 27710, USA.

    E-mail: [email protected];

    [email protected]

    reviews

    TCB 08/00 paste-up 30/6/00 8:54 am Page 322

  • reviews

    trends in CELL BIOLOGY (Vol. 10) August 2000 323

    has 148 residues), evolutionarily highly conservedand comprises four EF hands. The first two EFhands combine to form a globular N-terminal domain that is separated by a short flexible linker froma highly homologous C-terminal domain consisting ofEF hands 3 and 4 (Fig. 2).

    Ca21 sensors must be able to detect and respond to a biologically relevant range of intracellular freeCa21 concentrations. CaM fits this profile as itsaffinity for Ca21 (Kd 5 5 3 10

    27 M to 5 3 1026 M) fallswithin the range of intracellular Ca21 concentrationsexhibited by most cells (1027 M to 1026 M). However,it has additional discrimination for Ca21, as the C-terminal pair of EF hands has a three- to fivefoldhigher affinity for Ca21 than the N-terminal pair ofsites. By contrast, many Ca21-binding proteins witha considerably higher affinity (Kd ,10

    27 M) act asbuffers by sequestering excess free Ca21, whereasCa21-binding proteins with a considerably loweraffinity (Kd .10

    25 M) could not act as sensors because they are unable to detect the range ofchanges in intracellular free Ca21 concentrationsthat normally occur in cells.

    The two domains of CaM adopt differentconformations in the absence or presence of Ca21

    (Fig. 2). In the absence of Ca21, the N-terminal domain of the apo-CaM molecule adopts a closedconformation in which the helices in both EFhands are packed together. By contrast, still in the absence of Ca21, the C-terminal domain of apo-CaMadopts a semiopen conformation in which a par-tially exposed hydrophobic patch is accessible tosolvent. This might allow the C-terminal domain ofCaM to interact with some target proteins at restinglevels of intracellular free Ca21 (Ref. 8).

    In the event of a transient rise in Ca21, the Ca21

    ion is coordinated in each Ca21-binding loop ofCa21CaM by seven, primarily carboxylate, ligands.The binding of Ca21 leads to substantial alterationsin the interhelical angles within the EF hands ineach domain and dramatically changes the two domains of CaM to produce more open confor-mations (Fig. 2). These structural rearrangements inCaM result in the concerted exposure of hydrophobicgroups in a methionine-rich crevice of each domainthat is distinct from the Ca21-binding loops. The ex-posure to solvent of these hydrophobic residues isakin to a Ca21-controlled unfolding of CaM and un-leashes considerable free energy. It is this capacity toconvert the Ca21-binding event into biochemical en-ergy that characterizes the Ca21-sensor proteins andis the basis of their ability to transduce Ca21 signals.

    Calmodulin: location, mobility and translocationIs CaM regulated at the subcellular level, and how

    is this related to Ca21 signalling? The concentrationand location of CaM do appear to play an importantrole in regulating its biological activity. CaM consti-tutes at least 0.1% of the total protein present incells (1026 M 1025 M) and is expressed at even

    trends in Cell Biology

    Nucleus

    Ca2+ sensors Effectors

    (a)

    (b)

    Ca2+

    Ca2+

    Ca2+ Ca2+

    Ca2+

    Ca2+

    Amplitudemodulated (AM)

    Frequencymodulated (FM)

    Ca2+ buffers and transporters

    FIGURE 1

    (a) Sources of intracellular Ca21 signals. Ca21 enters cells viaextracellular plasma-membrane receptors or from intracellularstores, producing transient local or global changes in itsdistribution. The Ca21 oscillations are modulated in theiramplitudes (AM) or frequencies (FM) and are therefore capableof conveying signalling information in complex ways. (b) EF-hand Ca21-binding proteins are classified as buffers/transportersand sensors. The Ca21 sensors change conformation on bindingCa21 and transduce changes in cell function by regulatingdownstream effectors.

    trends in Cell Biology

    (a) (b)

    FIGURE 2

    The Ca21-regulated conformational change in calmodulin. Themain chain structure of Ca21-free (apo) CaM (a) andCa214CaM (b) are shown in red with their respective N-terminal domains on top. Methionine side chains are shownin purple to denote the location of potential hydrophobicpockets in each of the two domains. Ca21 binding produceslarge changes in the helices in both domains, resulting in theexposure of several hydrophobic residues.

    TCB 08/00 paste-up 30/6/00 8:54 am Page 323

  • reviews

    324 trends in CELL BIOLOGY (Vol. 10) August 2000

    higher levels in rapidly growing cells, especiallythose undergoing cell division and differentiation.The local intracellular availability of CaM is likely tobe biologically significant because various CaM-dependent effectors are regulated over a wide rangeof free CaM concentrations (10212 M 1026 M).

    Recent studies of CaM tagged with green-fluor-escent protein (GFP) show that CaM is found through-out the cytosol and nucleus in HeLa cells, although it is concentrated around the mitotic apparatus in cells undergoing mitosis (Fig. 3), especially around the centrioles and the cytoplasmic furrow during

    cytokinesis9. Other fluorescently labelled CaMmolecules have provided information on its cellularmobility and location. Experiments with serum-deprived Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts first indicated thatthe majority of CaM was freely diffusible, but theCaM was then immobilized in response to stimulationby serum10. However, other studies on unstimulatedsmooth-muscle cells showed that most CaM isbound, possibly to Ca21-independent binding proteins, at resting concentrations of free Ca21.

    In response to a rise in Ca21, CaM exhibits a com-plex pattern of cellular localization, including a significant redistribution from the cytosol to the nu-cleus11. This stimulus-dependent movement of CaMto the nucleus and its activation has also been de-tected in neurons12. CaM has also been seen to accumulate slowly in the nucleus of hormone-treated pancreatic acinar cells13. The mechanism oftranslocation in smooth-muscle cells apparently involves the passive diffusion of CaM into the nucleus, where it might associate with targets in aCa21-dependent manner14.

    The synchronization between CaM and Ca21 signalsis also being explored. A direct relationship betweena rise in the levels of intracellular free Ca21 and theCa21-dependent activation of CaM was first observedduring a response to wound healing in fibroblasts15.Ca21 oscillations in the secretory granules of pan-creatic acinar cells have also been correlated with oscillations in the local concentration of CaM13.Recent studies on sea-urchin eggs undergoing mito-sis, however, indicate that the spatial patterns ofCa21 are different from those of Ca21-activatedCaM16. Interestingly, the Ca21-dependent activation

    of CaM exhibits a heterogenous distri-bution pattern in the cells that havebeen studied, indicating the presence ofdiscrete populations of CaM. Thesestudies emphasize the importance oftemporal and spatial relationships be-tween Ca21 signals and CaM function.

    Calmodulin: regulation of effectorsAn important obstacle to studies on

    many Ca21-sensor proteins is the prob-lem of identifying downstream targets.Biochemical and genetic approacheshave recently started to identify targetsfor some of the S100 class of proteins17

    and also for members of the myristoyl-ated Ca21 sensors, such as frequenin18.By contrast, CaM has been known forsome time to regulate several classes ofproteins and enzymes in a Ca21-depend-ent manner. The binding of target pro-teins by CaM raises the affinity of CaM for Ca21 by approximately tenfold19 andsensitizes the CaMeffector complex tochanges in Ca21 concentrations. Interest-ingly, many of the most highly charac-terized effectors (e.g. the CaM-dependent adenylyl cyclases, phospho-diesterases, protein kinases and the proteinphosphatase calcineurin) are directly or

    trends in Cell Biology

    (a) (b) (c)

    FIGURE 3

    Distribution of calmodulin and tubulin in the mitotic spindle. (a) A spindle visualized with an anticalmodulin antibody.

    (b) A Nomarski image of a mitotic spindle formed by incubationin a Xenopus extract. (c) A spindle visualized with

    an antitubulin antibody.

    TABLE I SOME RECENT EXAMPLES OF CALMODULIN-REGULATED PROTEINS

    Protein Comments Ref.

    Cabin1 Thymocyte transcriptional regulator 45

    NAP-22 Neuronal substrate of protein kinase C 46

    Striatin Neuronal, associates with phosphatase 2A 47

    CAP-19 Neuronal, IQ calmodulin-binding motif 48

    EGF-receptor Human, CaM binds at juxtamembrane 49

    MLC phosphatase (targeting subunit) Participant in muscle contraction/relaxation 50

    Connexin 32 Located at gap junctions 51

    ChURP Located in the nucleus 52

    High MW protein Cardiac muscle phosphoprotein 53

    Beta-2-glycoprotein Membrane-associated protein in kidney 54

    Retinal proteins Involved in neuronal synaptic transmission 55

    Extracellular proteins Located in animal body fluids 56

    Sperm proteins Spermatocyte, acrosome reaction 57

    Plant proteins Plasma membrane transporter 58

    Yeast proteins Involved in cell growth and division 59

    Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Component in receptor signalling 60

    TCB 08/00 paste-up 30/6/00 8:54 am Page 324

  • reviews

    trends in CELL BIOLOGY (Vol. 10) August 2000 325

    indirectly involved in protein phosphorylation.CaM also regulates the activities of the plasma-membrane Ca21 pump, various ion channels, theryanodine receptor and isoforms of the inositol(1,4,5)-trisphosphate receptor. The list of CaM tar-gets is extensive and constantly growing (Table 1).

    Are there differences in the mechanisms by whichCaM and other Ca21 transducers regulate their targets? CaM performs a variety of roles, and CaM-binding proteins can be categorized into at least sixclasses based on their modes of regulation in thepresence and absence of Ca21 (Fig. 4). One group ofeffectors, which we designate class A, binds essen-tially irreversibly to CaM irrespective of Ca21. CaMis thus more appropriately considered a subunit ofthese proteins. One example is phosphorylase kinase, an enzyme that requires denaturing condi-tions to dissociate CaM but is activated in the presence of Ca21. Members of a second group of ef-fectors (class B) bind to CaM in the absence of Ca21

    (i.e. to the apo-CaM form) but dissociate reversiblyin the presence of Ca21 (Ref. 20). Examples includeproteins such as neuromodulin and neurogranin,which might serve as intracellular reservoirs forCaM at resting concentrations of Ca21 but liberateCa21-activated CaM in response to a transient Ca21

    signal.A third group of effectors (class C) includes

    smooth-muscle myosin-light-chain kinase (MLCK)and calcineurin. These class-C effectors form low-affinity, inactive complexes with CaM at low con-centrations of Ca21, when CaM is unoccupied orpartially occupied by Ca21 [,2 (mole Ca21) (moleCaM)21]. At high concentrations of Ca21, these tar-gets engage in a high-affinity complex and are acti-vated by CaM21,22. A fourth class of proteins (class D)binds to CaM in the presence of Ca21, but, in thiscase, CaM inhibits their function. This group in-cludes enzymes such as select members of the G-protein-receptor kinases23, as well as the inositol(1,4,5)-trisphosphate receptor type 124.

    A fifth group of effectors (class E), such as theCaM-dependent protein kinases I, II and IV, exhibitmore conventional behaviour and are activated byCa21CaM. The class-E targets also exhibit an access-ory form of regulation in which CaM binding pro-motes their regulation (specifically via phosphoryl-ation) by another CaM-regulated kinase (i.e. aCaM-kinase kinase ), which we designate class F. Inthe specific case of the multimeric CaM kinase II,both the substrate and the catalytic subunits requireCaM binding to promote intermolecular autophos-phorylation25. This novel case, in which one CaM-dependent protein (class E) is directly regulated byanother CaM-dependent protein (class F), demon-strates the convergence of different CaM-regulatedpathways and is indicative of CaM-signalling cascades.

    The observation that CaM regulates a specific setof proteins yet engages in different types of Ca21-dependent interactions implies that CaM and its targets both exhibit certain complementary featuresthat enable CaM recognition but possess other as-pects that still allow CaM to discriminate between

    various classes of effectors. As CaM, like many Ca21

    sensors, is a relatively small protein, it must there-fore use multiple interaction surfaces to accomplishthese ends. These interaction sites enable CaM toconvert the energy provided by Ca21 binding intoeffector regulation.

    Calmodulineffector coupling: binding andactivation

    The Ca21-controlled exposure of hydrophobicgroups in the two domains of CaM releases a con-siderable amount of biochemical energy, which istransduced into two separable effects: a change inthe affinity of CaM for the effector and/or an al-teration in the effectors function. Studies focusing onone group of CaM-regulated enzymes in particular,the CaM-dependent protein kinases, have providedimportant insights into some of the mechanismsunderlying these phenomena. A short peptide of~20 residues that is responsible for bindingCa21CaM, designated a CaM-binding domain, hasbeen identified in many CaM-regulated proteins(Fig. 5a) and in other types of CaM-binding pro-teins26. The crystal structure of CaM kinase I revealsthat the CaM-binding domain directly interactswith and sterically obstructs the putative substrate-binding sites of the inactive enzyme27. Furthermore,the N-terminal part of the CaM-binding sequenceloops away from the enzyme, exposing the hydrophobic side chain of Trp303 to solvent andproviding potential access for Ca21CaM to bind(Fig. 5b). This proposal is supported by experimentsshowing that the mutation of Trp303 to Ser in CaMkinase I significantly lowered the apparent affinityof CaM kinase I for Ca21CaM28.

    trends in Cell Biology

    CaM-A+Low [Ca2+] High [Ca2+]

    apoCaM CaM-A

    + A

    CaMapoCaM CaM-B

    + B - B

    + B+ C

    - C+ D

    - D

    + E

    - E

    + F

    - F

    CaM-C+CaM CaM-C

    CaM-D-CaM

    CaM-E+

    CaM-E++

    CaM-F+CaM

    FIGURE 4

    Ca21-dependent functions of various classes of calmodulin-binding (CaM-binding)proteins. CaM and various classes of targets exist in free or bound states. Targetclasses A, B and C are associated with CaM or Ca21-free CaM (apo-CaM) at low(resting) intracellular free Ca21 concentrations (red). When Ca21 concentrations arehigh (green), class B dissociates from CaM, classes D, E and F associate with CaM, classes A, C, E and F are activated by CaM (1), and class D is inactivated by CaM (2).

    TCB 08/00 paste-up 30/6/00 8:54 am Page 325

  • reviews

    326 trends in CELL BIOLOGY (Vol. 10) August 2000

    A homologous hydrophobic residue is conservedin other CaM kinases (Fig. 5a). In the absence of detailed information on complexes between CaMand its intact effectors, spectroscopic and crystallo-graphic studies of Ca21CaM complexed with pep-tides corresponding to the CaM-binding domains offour CaM kinases including CaM kinase I show ineach case that this conserved hydrophobic residueinteracts exclusively with the methionine-rich hydrophobic pocket in the C-terminal domain ofCa21CaM2932 (Fig. 5c). Recently determined three-dimensional structures of Ca21CaM bound to peptides from the plasma membrane Ca21ATPasepump and a CaM-kinase kinase also reveal additionalmodes of interaction between CaM and these otherCaM-binding peptides33,34. These peptide studies indicate that the C-terminal domain of Ca21CaMmight confer binding energy on the intact enzymes.Indeed, this appears to be the case because comple-mentary mutagenesis experiments on the Metresidues of CaM showed that an evolutionarily in-variant Met124 in the C-terminal domain ofCa21CaM that contacts the conserved hydrophobicresidues in several CaM-binding peptides (Fig. 5c) isnecessary for high-affinity binding and activation ofCaM kinase I as well as for three other CaM-dependentprotein kinases35,36.

    In contrast to the C-terminal domain ofCa21CaM, residues in the hydrophobic pocket ofthe N-terminal domain of Ca21CaM perform vary-ing functions with different CaM-dependent kinases.The results from the crystallographic studies showthat hydrophobic residues in the N-terminal do-main of Ca21CaM mainly interact with the C-terminal part of the CaM-binding peptides of smooth-muscle MLCK and CaM kinase II, respectively(Fig. 5a). Progressive C-terminal deletions andchimeric substitutions in the CaM-binding domainof smooth-muscle MLCK showed that the C-terminalhalf of the CaM-binding domains of these enzymestrends in Cell Biology

    S K K Q A F N A T A V V R H M R KR K L K G A I L T T M L A T R N F S

    R K W

    W

    Q K T G H A V R A I G R L S SR R W K K N F I A V S A A N R F K K

    CaM C-domain CaM N-domain

    I L W F R G L N R I Q T Q I R V V NP S W T T V I L V K S M L R K R S F

    Interaction site on calmodulin(a)

    (b)

    (c)

    CaM KICaM KIIsmMLCKskMLCKCa2+ATPaseCaM KK

    Main chain of Ca2+ - CAM

    CAM-binding domainof smMLCK

    Conserved tryptophan

    Met124 residue

    4

    FIGURE 5

    (a) Alignment of amino acid sequences from selectedcalmodulin-binding (CaM-binding) domains. The enzymes areCaM kinase I (CaM KI), CaM kinase II (CaM KII), smooth- andskeletal-muscle myosin-light-chain kinases (smMLCK andskMLCK), the plasma-membrane Ca21-pumpATPase (Ca21

    ATPase) and CaM-kinase kinase (CaM KK). In most cases, ahydrophobic residue (red) from the corresponding peptidesinteracts with the C-terminal domain of Ca21CaM. The boxedresidue in CaM KI is Trp303. The N-terminal domain ofCa21CaM interacts primarily with the C-terminal half of thepeptides. (For additional information on CaM binding domains,see http://calcium.oci.utoronto.ca/) (b) Two crystalstructures showing the main chain of Ca214CaM on the left andCaM kinase I on the right. The N-terminal domain of CaM andthe ATP-binding lobe of CaM kinase I are both positioned on top,with helices red and sheets green. The Trp303 side chain fromthe CaM-binding domain of CaM kinase I (black) extends awayfrom the enzyme in the direction of CaM. (c) Crystal structureshowing the main chain of Ca214CaM (white) in complex withthe helical CaM-binding domain of smooth-muscle myosin-light-chain kinase (green). CaM wraps around the helix so that theconserved Trp of the peptide makes contact with Met124 (red)in the C-terminal domain of CaM.

    TCB 08/00 paste-up 30/6/00 8:54 am Page 326

  • reviews

    trends in CELL BIOLOGY (Vol. 10) August 2000 327

    are required for Ca21CaM-dependent acti-vation37,38. Furthermore, deletion studies of CaM kinase I show that the C-terminal portion of itsCaM-binding sequence confers high affinity forCa21CaM, as well as CaM-dependent activity39.These results complement those from experimentson CaM showing that the hydrophobic pocket in itsN-terminal domain generates a high-affinity com-plex with CaM kinase II, activates smooth-muscleMLCK and combines the functions of high-affinitybinding and activation of CaM kinase I35,40.

    In comparison with unbound Ca21CaM, theCa21CaMpeptide complexes exhibit a dramaticcontraction enabling CaM to wrap around and se-quester the helical CaM-binding peptides (Fig. 5c).Experiments on hydrophilic residues of CaM showthat charged and polar residues are also required toactivate the smooth-muscle MLCK by promotingthe accessibility of substrate to this particular en-zyme. Surprisingly, the hydrophilic residues onCaM responsible for this effect are originally separated from each other on both domains of freeCa21CaM by more than 50 but then form a stable latch less than 5 apart in the Ca21CaMpeptide complex41. These polar groups do notcontact the CaM-binding peptide directly, so theymight exert their effects on the intact protein kinaseby interacting with an area distinct from its CaM-binding domain. Indeed neutron- and X-ray-scattering studies on the kinase domain of skeletal-muscle MLCK indicate that the CaM-binding domain is displaced to one side of the enzyme bythe binding of Ca21CaM42. This event could exposethe substrate-binding site of the enzyme and indicateshow CaM might remove an inhibitory CaM-bindingdomain away from the kinase domain, thus leadingto enzyme activation.

    The preceding mechanistic studies show that theregulation of enzymes by Ca21CaM is a highly or-dered, cooperative and complementary process thatcontributes to both the affinity and specificity fortargets. Another surprising outcome is the discoverythat the structures of Ca21CaMpeptide complexesare relevant to their corresponding enzymes. However,in addition to the obvious limitation in the use ofpeptides to study mechanisms of enzyme acti-vation, there are mounting indications that peptidesmight not be entirely suitable for studying otherfunctions of the full-length target protein. For example, Ca21 has a considerably higher affinity forthe CaMMLCK-peptide complex than for the cor-responding CaMMLCK-enzyme complex19. Also,mutations in the CaM-binding domain of smooth-muscle MLCK have a significantly greater effect onCaM binding and activation than the same changeswithin the context of the corresponding CaM-bindingpeptide40. Differences in the Ca21-dependent inter-action of CaM with either the CaM-binding peptideof skeletal-muscle MLCK or the intact enzyme havealso been observed by small-angle scattering43. Oneexplanation for the adaptability and the higheraffinity exhibited by the shorter CaM-binding do-mains is the conformational flexibility inherent inisolated peptides. By contrast, the relatively fixed

    conformation of the intact, folded enzymes restrictstheir ability to adapt similarly to structural changeswithin their CaM-binding domains. It is helpful tobear these caveats in mind when peptides are usedto model effector function.

    Perspective and conclusionThe extensive characterization of CaM provides a

    useful precedent for less-well-understood Ca21 sen-sors. At the subcellular level, the spatial and temporalcoordination between Ca21, CaM and its effectorsare important for channelling all three componentsinto a productive signalling pathway. The ability ofCaM to integrate Ca21 signals into different cellularcontexts by migrating between various compart-ments further underscores this point. At the inter-molecular level, CaM uses different modes of Ca21-dependent interactions, which are responsible for generating high affinity as well as specificity fortargets. At the submolecular level, the Ca21-triggeredexposure of energy-donating groups on CaM is coupledto energy-accepting groups on its targets, leading tochanges in Ca21 binding by CaM as well as in thefunction of its effectors.

    Finally, how are these levels of regulating CaM related to each other? It is likely that the mobility ofseparate pools of CaM derives from the different interactions between CaM and its targets. Therefore,some classes of proteins might anchor CaM to spe-cific cellular locations, depending on the stability ofa particular CaMeffector complex in the absence orpresence of a Ca21 signal. The affinity of such com-plexes is likely to be due to complementary interac-tions between sites on the target proteins and siteson CaM that change conformation in response toCa21. The Ca21-dependent interactions not only af-fect the affinity of the complex but also regulate theactivity of effectors. This apparent ability of aCaMeffector complex to decode Ca21 signals hasbeen exemplified in a recent study showing thatCaM participates in converting Ca21 oscillations intochanges in the autonomous enzymatic activity of atleast one target, CaM kinase II44. Additional studieson CaM will lead to a more-complete integration ofits levels of regulation. Meanwhile, it will be inter-esting to see whether any of the mechanisms exhib-ited by CaM will be relevant to other Ca21 sensors.

    References1 Ghosh, A. and Greenberg, M.E. (1995) Calcium signaling in neurons:

    molecular mechanisms and cellular consequences. Science 268,239246

    2 Allbritton, N.L. and Meyer, T. (1993) Localized calcium spikes andpropagating calcium waves. Cell Calcium 14, 691697

    3 Hardingham, G.E. and Bading, H. (1998) Nuclear calcium: a keyregulator of gene expression. Biometals 11, 345358

    4 Thomas, A.P. et al. (1996) Spatial and temporal aspects of cellularcalcium signaling. FASEB J. 10, 15051517

    5 Dolmetsch, R.E. et al. (1998) Calcium oscillations increase the efficiencyand specificity of gene expression. Nature 392, 933936

    6 Ikura, M. (1996) Calcium binding and conformational response in EF hand proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 1417

    7 Braunewell, K-H. and Gundelfinger, E.D. (1999) Intracellular neuronalcalcium sensor proteins: a family of EF hand calcium-binding proteinsin search of a function. Cell Tissue Res. 295, 112

    8 Swindells, M.B. and Ikura, M. (1996) Pre-formation of the semi-openconformation by the apo-calmodulin C-terminal domain andimplications for binding IQ motifs. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 501504

    TCB 08/00 paste-up 30/6/00 8:54 am Page 327

  • reviews

    328 trends in CELL BIOLOGY (Vol. 10) August 2000

    9 Li, C-J. et al. (1999) Dynamic redistribution of calmodulin in Hela cellsduring cell division as revealed by a GFPcalmodulin fusion proteintechnique. J. Cell Sci. 112, 15671577

    10 Gough, A.H. and Taylor, D.L. (1993) Fluorescence anisotropy imagingmicroscopy maps calmodulin binding during cellular contraction andlocomotion. J. Cell. Biol. 121, 10951107

    11 Luby-Phelps, K. et al. (1995) Ca21-regulated dynamiccompartmentalization of calmodulin in living smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2153221538

    12 Deisseroth, K. et al. (1998) Translocation of calmodulin to the nucleussupports CREB phosphorylation in hippocampal neurons. Nature 392,198202

    13 Craske, M. et al. (1999) Hormone-induced secretory and nucleartranslocation of calmodulin: oscillations of calmodulin concentrationwith the nucleus as an integrator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96,44264431

    14 Liao, B. et al. (1999) Mechanism of Ca21-dependent nuclearaccumulation of calmodulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96,62176222

    15 Hahn, K. et al. (1992) Patterns of elevated calcium and calmodulinactivation in living cells. Nature 359, 736738

    16 Torok, K. et al. (1998) Imaging the spatial dynamics of calmodulinactivation during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 8, 692699

    17 Heizmann, C.W. and Cox, J.A. (1998) New perspectives on S100proteins: a multifunctional Ca21-, Zn21- and Cu21-binding proteinfamily. Biometals 11, 383397

    18 Hendricks, K.B. et al. (1999) Yeast homologue of neuronal frequenin is a regulator of phosphatidylinositol-4-OH kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 1,234241

    19 Peersen, O. et al. (1997) Intermolecular tuning of calmodulin by targetpeptides and proteins: differential effects on Ca21 binding andimplications for kinase activation. Protein Sci. 6, 794807

    20 Jurado, L.A. et al. (1999) Apocalmodulin. Physiol. Rev. 79, 66168221 Mamar-Bachi, A. and Cox, J.A. (1987) Quantitative analysis of the free

    energy coupling in the system calmodulin, calcium, smooth musclemyosin light chain kinase. Cell Calcium 8, 473482

    22 Kincaid, R.L. and Vaughan, M. (1986) Direct comparison of Ca21

    requirements for calmodulin interaction with and activation of proteinphosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 11931197

    23 Iacovelli, L. et al. (1999) Regulation of G-protein coupled receptorkinase subtypes by calcium sensor proteins. FASEB J. 13, 18

    24 Hirota, J. et al. (1999) Calmodulin inhibits inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-induced calcium release through the purified and reconstituted inositol1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1. FEBS Lett. 456, 322326

    25 Means, A.R. (2000) Regulatory cascades involving calmodulin-dependent protein kinases. Mol. Endocrinol. 14, 413

    26 Rhoads, A.R. and Friedberg, F. (1997) Sequence motifs for calmodulinrecognition. FASEB J. 11, 331340

    27 Goldberg, J. et al. (1996) Structural basis for the autoinhibition ofcalcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I. Cell 84, 875887

    28 Masayuki, M. and Nairn, A.C. (1998) Characterization of themechanism of regulation of Ca21/calmodulin-dependent protein kinaseI by calmodulin and by Ca21/calmodulin-dependent protein kinasekinase. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2147321481

    29 Ikura, M. et al. (1992) Solution structure of a calmodulintarget peptidecomplex by multidimensional NMR. Science 256, 632638

    30 Meador, W.E. et al. (1992) Target enzyme recognition by calmodulin:2.4 structure of a calmodulinpeptide complex. Science 257,12511255

    31 Meador, W.E. et al. (1993) Modulation of calmodulin plasticity inmolecular recognition on the basis of X-ray structures. Science 262,17181721

    32 Yuan, T. et al. (1998) Tryptophan fluorescence quenching bymethionine and selenomethionine residues of calmodulin: orientation ofpeptide and protein binding. Biochemistry 37, 31873195

    33 Elshorst, B. et al. (1999) NMR solution structure of a complex ofcalmodulin with a binding peptide of the Ca21-pump. Biochemistry 38,1232012332

    34 Osawa, M. et al. (1999) A novel target recognition revealed bycalmodulin in complex with Ca21calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase.Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 819824

    35 Chin, D. et al. (1997) Characterization of substrate phosphorylation anduse of calmodulin mutants to address implications from the enzymecrystal structure of calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I. J. Biol. Chem.272, 3123531240

    36 Chin, D. and Means, A.R. (1996) Methionine to glutamine substitutionsin the C-terminal domain of calmodulin impair the activation of threeprotein kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3046530471

    37 Tanaka, M. et al. (1995) Pseudosubstrate sequence may not be criticalfor autoinhibition of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase. EMBO J.14, 28392846

    38 Chin, D. et al. (1999) Calmodulin kinase II chimeras used to investigatethe structural requirements for smooth muscle myosin light chain kinaseautoinhibition and calmodulin-dependent activation. Biochemistry 38,1506115069

    39 Yokokura, H. et al. (1995) The regulatory region of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I contains closely associatedautoinhibitory and calmodulin-binding domains. J. Biol. Chem. 270,2385123859

    40 Chin, D. et al. (1997) Functional consequences of truncating amino acidside chains located at a calmodulinpeptide interface. J. Biol. Chem. 272,55105513

    41 Su, Z. et al. (1994) Role of domain 3 of calmodulin in activation ofcalmodulin-stimulated phosphodiesterase and smooth muscle myosinlight chain kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1676116765

    42 Krueger, J. et al. (1997) Structures of calmodulin and a functionalmyosin light chain kinase in the activated complex : a neutronscattering study. Biochemistry 36, 60176023

    43 Krueger, J. et al. (1998) Calmodulin binding to myosin light chainkinase begins at substoichiometric Ca21 concentrations: a small-anglescattering study of binding and conformational transitions. Biochemistry37, 1781017817

    44 De Koninck, P. and Schulman, H. (1998) Sensitivity of CaM kinase II tothe frequency of Ca21 oscillations. Science 279, 227230

    45 Youn, H.D. et al. (1999) Apoptosis of T cells mediated by Ca21-inducedrelease of the transcription factor MEF2. Science 286, 790793

    46 Yamamoto, Y. et al. (1997) Biochemical evidence for the presence ofNAP-22, a novel acidic calmodulin-binding protein, in the synapticvesicles of rat brain. Neurosci. Lett. 224, 127130

    47 Moreno, C.S. et al. (2000) WD40 repeat proteins striatin and S/G (2)nuclear autoantigen are members of a novel family of calmodulin-binding proteins that associate with protein phosphatase 2A. J. Biol.Chem. 275, 52575267

    48 Smith, M.L. et al. (1998) Identification of a neuronal calmodulin-binding peptide, CAP-19, containing an IQ motif. Brain Res. Mol. BrainRes. 62, 1224

    49 Martin-Nieto, J. and Villalobo, J. (1998) The human epidermal growthfactor contains a juxtamembrane calmodulin-binding site. Biochemistry37, 227236

    50 Sobieszek, A. et al. (1997) Purification and characterization of a kinase-associated, myofibrillar smooth muscle myosin light chain phosphatasepossessing a calmodulin-targeting subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 272,70277033

    51 Torok, K. et al. (1997) Connexin 32 of gap junctions contains two cytoplasmic calmodulin-binding domains. Biochem. J. 326,479483

    52 Lodge, A.P. et al. (1999) Identification of chURP, a nuclear calmodulin-binding protein related to hnRNP-U. Eur. J. Biochem. 261,137147

    53 Kakkar, R. et al. (1997) In vitro phosphorylation of bovine cardiac muscle high molecular weight calmodulin-binding protein bycyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and dephosphorylation by calmodulin-dependent phosphatase. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 177,215219

    54 Klaerke, D.A. (1997) Identification of beta2-glycoprotein I as amembrane-associated protein in kidney: purification by calmodulin affinity chromatography. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1339,203216

    55 Xu, X.Z. et al. (1998) Retinal targets for calmodulin include proteins implicated in synaptic transmission. J. Biol. Chem. 273,3129731307

    56 WenQiang, T. et al. (1997) Extracellular calmodulin-binding proteins inbody fluids of animals. J. Endocrinol. 155,1317

    57 Trejo, R. and Delhumeau, G. (1997) Calmodulin content, Ca21-dependent calmodulin-binding proteins, and testis growth:identification of Ca21-dependent calmodulin-binding proteins inprimary spermatocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 48, 127136

    58 Schuurink, R.C. et al. (1998) Characterization of a calmodulin-bindingtransporter from the plasma membrane of barley aleurone. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 19441949

    59 Craig, R. and Norbury, C. (1998) The novel murine calmodulin-bindingprotein Sha1 disrupts mitotic spindle and replication checkpointfunctions in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci. 111, 36093619

    60 Joyal, J.L. et al. (1997) Calmodulin activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2818328186

    Acknowledgements

    Our researchcited in thisreview was

    funded by NIHgrants HD-07503

    and GM-33976to ARM. We

    thank themembers of the

    Meanslaboratory for

    stimulatingdiscussions.

    TCB 08/00 paste-up 30/6/00 8:54 am Page 328