Upload
anthony-avery
View
17
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Call to Conversation. March 25, 2014 Dr. Adena Williams Loston President. SACSCOC Communications Email Inquiry and Formal Letter. Addresses St. Philip ’ s College accreditation Refers specifically to: Changes to General Education Program Faculty Approval of Curriculum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Call to ConversationMarch 25, 2014Dr. Adena Williams LostonPresident
SACSCOC Communications Email Inquiry and Formal Letter• Addresses St. Philip’s College accreditation• Refers specifically to:• Changes to General Education Program• Faculty Approval of Curriculum• Faculty Responsibility for Curriculum• Substantive Change• Institutional Autonomy
• Context:• EDUC/PSYC 1300 Learning Frameworks Course
NOTE: ALL Alamo Colleges received this letter except NLC
SACSCOC Principles
• Requirement• Must be met or will not be reaffirmed
• Standard• Must be met or may be placed on monitoring
EDUC/PSYC 1300Learning Frameworks
Core Requirement 2.7.3: General Education
Provide evidence of: •Breadth of knowledge•Coherent rational•If replacing the required Humanities and required Social Sciences course, it must meet the requirements for those areas (cannot be a study skills course)
EDUC/PSYC 1300Learning Frameworks
Comprehensive Standard 3.4.1: Academic Program Approval
Provide evidence of: • Faculty approval of the changes to the general
education program• Institutional policies were followed
EDUC/PSYC 1300Learning FrameworksComprehensive Standard 3.4.10: Responsibility for Curriculum
Address the means by which the: • Institution places primary responsibility for curricular
content and quality with its faculty
EDUC/PSYC 1300Learning Frameworks
Comprehensive Standard 3.12.1: Substantive Change
Provide evidence that: • SACSCOC approval to change the general education program was
granted
OR
Provide justification that:• Changes to the general education program should not be
considered a significant departure from the current general education program
Institutional Autonomy
Provide examples of institutional autonomy related to the review and implementation of these curricular changes.
SPC Response
SPC is responding to these inquiries:• In collaboration with the other colleges• In collaboration with faculty leadership and administration• With utmost integrity and candor• Within the deadline of April 15, 2014
SACSCOC will respond:• SPC provided an acceptable response, or• Request further information or clarification, or• Take further action
What is my Role?
SPC wants to get this right• Respond to any information requests you may receive as part of
this review with openness and honesty• ALWAYS follow policies and procedures• When in doubt, check!
SACSCOC Accreditation Liaison, Dr. Karen [email protected] 210-486-2339