Calipatria Solar Farm TIA - Granicus

Calipatria Solar Farm TIA

Prepared for: 70SM 8ME, LLC 71SM 8ME, LLC

c/o 8minutenergy Renewables LLC

Prepared by:

Fehr & Peers

March 25, 2011

IE10-0037

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................. i Project Trip Estimates .......................................................................................................................................... i Intersection and Roadway Segment Impacts ....................................................................................................... i Site Access Impacts ............................................................................................................................................. ii Sight Distance Impacts ......................................................................................................................................... ii

1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1

2. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Roadway Network .................................................................................................................................. 3 Level of Service Methods .................................................................................................................................... 4 Existing Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................................................................ 5 Existing Signal Warrant Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 6 Existing Roadway Segment Level of Service ...................................................................................................... 6 Field Observations ............................................................................................................................................... 6

3. Analysis Parameters ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Project Description............................................................................................................................................... 8 Project Study Area ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Project Traffic Estimates ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Project Impact Criteria ....................................................................................................................................... 10

4. Existing Plus Construction Impact Analysis ................................................................................................ 12 Construction Traffic ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Construction Phase Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................................................... 12 Project Signal Warrant Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 13 Roadway Segment Levels of Service ................................................................................................................ 13 Intersection and Roadway Segment Impacts .................................................................................................... 13 Proposed Site Access ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Sight Distance Impacts ...................................................................................................................................... 14

5. Project Opening Year (2012) Impact Analysis .............................................................................................. 15 Background Growth ........................................................................................................................................... 15 Opening Year Roadway Improvements ............................................................................................................ 15 Project Traffic ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Opening Year Intersection Levels of Service .................................................................................................... 15 Opening Year Signal Warrant Analysis ............................................................................................................. 15 Roadway Segment Levels of Service ................................................................................................................ 16 Intersection and Roadway Segment Impacts .................................................................................................... 17 Proposed Site Access ....................................................................................................................................... 17 Sight Distance Impacts ...................................................................................................................................... 17

6. Year 2030 Cumulative Conditions.................................................................................................................. 18 Year 2030 Cumulative Volumes ........................................................................................................................ 18 Cumulative Year Roadway Improvements ........................................................................................................ 18 Project Traffic ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Year 2030 Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service ....................................................................................... 18 Cumulative Year Signal Warrant Analysis ......................................................................................................... 18 Roadway Segment Levels of Service ................................................................................................................ 19 Intersection and Roadway Segment Impacts .................................................................................................... 20 Proposed Site Access ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Sight Distance Impacts ...................................................................................................................................... 20

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Existing Traffic Counts

Appendix B: Related Project Trip Assignment

Appendix c: Intersection Level of Service Calculations

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Using Average Control Vehicular Delay ........ 4

Table 2 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions .................................................................... 5

Table 3 Existing Intersection Levels of Service ............................................................................................ 5

Table 4 Existing Roadway Segment Levels of Service ................................................................................ 6

Table 5 Sight Distance at Area intersections ................................................................................................ 7

Table 6 Project Trip Generation Rates and Estimates ............................................................................... 10

Table 7 Existing and Construction Intersection Levels of Service .............................................................. 12

Table 8 Existing and Construction Roadway Segment Levels of Service .................................................. 13

Table 9 Opening Year Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................................. 16

Table 10 Opening Year Roadway Segment Levels of Service ................................................................... 16

Table 11 Cumulative Year (2030) Intersection Levels of Service ............................................................... 19

Table 12 Cumulative Year (2030) Roadway Segment Levels of Service ................................................... 19

Calipatria Solar Farm TIA March 2011

i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the results of the transportation impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed Calipatria Solar Farm 1 and Calipatria Solar Farm 2 projects located in Imperial County near the City of Calipatria, California. The proposed project is composed of two adjacent solar farms. The entire project site would be bounded by Peterson Road to the north, Young Road to the south, and Blair Road to the east. Lindsey Road would separate the two projects, with Solar Farm 1 located south of Lindsey Road and Solar Farm 2 located north of Lindsey Road. Vehicles would take access to the site from Blair Road, with a project driveway for Solar Farm 1 at its intersection with Wilkinson Road and Solar Farm 2 at its intersection with Montgomery Road.

The impacts of the proposed project to the surrounding transportation system were evaluated following the guidelines of the County of Imperial. The operations of four key intersections and three roadway segments were evaluated with level of service calculations for Existing, Opening Year (2012) and Cumulative Year (2035) conditions, with and without Construction or Project traffic.

PROJECT TRIP ESTIMATES

Each solar farm is estimated to generate 5 new AM and 5 new PM peak-hour trips and 20 daily trips during the operation Operations & Maintenance phase. Project construction for each solar farm is estimated to generate 54 new AM and 54 new PM peak-hour passenger car equivalency (PCE) trips, and 174 daily PCE trips. Because the two projects will be constructed concurrently and will operate concurrently, trip generation estimates for each project were compounded to account for both projects.

INTERSECTION AND ROADWAY SEGMENT IMPACTS

Construction Conditions

The project would not have any significant impacts at study intersections or along roadway facilities with the addition of construction traffic. Additionally, no study intersections meet signal warrants under this condition.

Project Conditions

The project would not have any significant impacts at study intersections or along roadway facilities with the addition of project traffic. Additionally, no study intersections meet signal warrants under this condition. The unsignalized intersection of Blair Road/SR-115 will operate at LOS C with and without the addition of project traffic. This does not create an impact, but the County requires reporting intersections that operate below LOS B for monitoring purposes.

Year 2035 Cumulative With Project Conditions

The project would not have any significant impacts at study intersections or along roadway facilities with the addition of project traffic under this condition. Additionally, no study intersections meet signal warrants. The unsignalized intersection of Blair Road/SR-115 will operate at LOS C with and without the addition of project traffic. This does not create an impact, but the County requires reporting intersections that operate below LOS B for monitoring purposes.


ii

SITE ACCESS IMPACTS

The project driveway will be located on Montgomery Road, which is 24’ wide. The roadway width and condition is sufficient to accommodate project traffic. Therefore, the project impact is less than significant.

SIGHT DISTANCE IMPACTS

There are no foreseeable sight distance impacts associated with this project.


1

1. INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of the transportation impact analysis (TIA) for two proposed solar farms located in Imperial County, near Calipatria, California. Combined, the proposed projects would be bounded by Peterson Road to the north, Lindsey Road to the south, and Blair Road to the east. Montgomery Road would separate the two projects, with Calipatria Solar Farm 1 located south of Lindsey Road and Calipatria Solar Farm 2 located north of Lindsey Road.

The analysis was conducted to identify potential effects of the proposed project on the surrounding transportation system and to recommend appropriate improvements to mitigate any significant impacts.

Transportation impacts were estimated following the Imperial County Traffic Study and Report Policy guidelines (2007). Our analysis included four intersections and three roadway segments:

Intersections

1. SR-111/Sinclair Road

2. Blair Road/Sinclair Road

3. Blair Road/Peterson Road

4. Blair Road/SR-115

Roadway Segments

1. SR-111 north of Sinclair Road

2. SR-115 west of Blair Road

3. SR-115 east of Blair Road

The operations of the study intersections were evaluated during the weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and afternoon (4:00 to 6:00 PM) peak hours, and study roadway segments during the full day, for the following six scenarios:

Scenario 1: Existing Conditions – Existing volumes obtained from turning movement counts representing the peak one-hour vehicle flow.

Scenario 2: Existing plus Construction Conditions – Existing traffic volumes plus new traffic generated by the construction of the proposed project.

Scenario 3: Opening Year Conditions (2012) – Existing traffic volumes with 2% annual growth rate applied to study facilities.

Scenario 4: Opening Year plus Project Conditions – Opening year traffic volumes plus the net new traffic generated by the proposed project.

Scenario 5: Cumulative Year Conditions (2030) – Existing traffic volumes with 2% annual growth rate plus related project traffic applied to study facilities.

Scenario 6: Cumulative Year plus Project Conditions (2030) – Cumulative year traffic volumes plus the net new traffic generated by the proposed project.


2

Site access and sight distance were also reviewed for potential issues.

The remainder of this report is divided into five chapters. The existing transportation system serving the site and the current operating conditions of the study intersections and roadway segments are described in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 describes analysis parameters and project trip generation, distribution, and assignment. Chapter 4 describes Existing plus Construction Traffic conditions. Chapter 5 describes Opening Year (2012) Conditions, which includes background growth along study roadway facilities. Year 2035 cumulative scenarios with and without the proposed project are discussed in Chapter 6.


3

2. EXISTING CONDITIONS

This chapter describes the existing conditions of the roadway facilities, traffic volumes, and intersection operations within the study area. This chapter also includes a discussion of the method used to quantify intersection operations and the corresponding results.

EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK

Regional access to the project site is by SR-111 and SR-115. Local access is provided to the site by Blair Road and Sinclair Road. The project driveways will be located along Montgomery Road and Wilkinson Road. This section describes the existing roadway network.

State Route 111 (SR-111) is a north-south, regional highway that extends from the US/Mexico Border through the Coachella Valley to Palm Springs. It is classified by the Imperial County General Plan as a State Highway/Expressway. In the project area, SR-111 is a two-lane roadway with a 48’ paved roadway, including a 14’ northbound travel lane, 13’ southbound travel lane, and 13’ turn lane. Shoulder widths are approximately 4’ on either side of the roadway, with an additional 5’ soft shoulder. Access to the roadway is available through side-street stop controlled intersections.

State Route 115 (SR-115) is primarily a northerly regional highway between Holtville and Calipatria. It is classified by the Imperial County General Plan as a State Highway/Expressway. Near the project site, SR-115 travels in the east-west direction and is a two-lane roadway. In the project vicinity, SR-115 has a 48’ paved roadway, including a 15’ westbound travel lane, 13’ eastbound travel lane, and 12’ turn lane. Shoulder widths are approximately 4’ on either side of the roadway, with an additional 5’ soft shoulder. Access to the roadway is available through side-street stop controlled intersections.

Sinclair Road is a two-lane east-west roadway extending eastbound from the Salton Sea to East Highline Canal Road. The Imperial County General Plan classifies Sinclair Road as a minor collector road near the project site. Within the project vicinity, Sinclair Road has 12’ travel lanes and 2’ shoulders in each direction, and 5’ soft shoulders on either side of the roadway. Sinclair Road is stop-controlled at its intersections with other roadways within the project study area.

Blair Road is a two lane north-south roadway extending between the cities of Calipatria and Niland. It is classified by the Imperial County General Plan as a major collector roadway, and provides access to the Calipatria State Prison, located adjacent to the project site. In the project vicinity north of SR-115 , Blair Road has a 32’ paved roadway, with 12’ travel lanes in each direction, 4’ paved shoulders and 5’ soft shoulders. South of SR-115, Blair Road is unpaved, with a crushed-rock roadway approximately 48 feet wide.

Peterson Road is a local east-west roadway extending from Brandt Road eastbound to East Highline Canal Road. At its intersection with Blair Road, Peterson Road has 12’ travel lanes and no shoulder in each direction; shortly beyond the intersection, Peterson Road is unpaved and runs alongside an agricultural canal. Vehicular traffic along Peterson Road is generally limited to agricultural vehicles.

Montgomery Road is a local east-west roadway extending from Brandt Road eastbound to Haley Road. Montgomery Road is approximately 24’ wide and is unpaved. There are signs denoting no through traffic approximately 100’ west of its intersection with Blair Road.

Wilkinson Road is a local east-west roadway extending Brandt Road eastbound to East Highline Canal Road. Wilkinson Road is approximately 24’ wide and is unpaved.

Lindsey Road is a local east-west roadway extending Brandt Road eastbound to East Highline Canal Road. Lindsey Road is approximately 24’ wide and is unpaved.


4

LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODS

The operations of roadway facilities are described with the term level of service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on such factors as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are defined from LOS A, with the least congested operating conditions, to LOS F, with the most congested operating conditions. LOS E represents “at-capacity” operations. Operations are designated as LOS F when volumes exceed capacity, resulting in stop-and-go conditions. The Imperial County General Plan Circulation and Scenic Highways Element (2008) states a minimum acceptable operating level of service C for all street segment links and intersections.

Signalized Intersections

The LOS method for signalized intersections approved by Imperial County analyzes intersection operations based on average control vehicular delay, as described in Chapter 16 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) by the Transportation Research Board. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized intersections is calculated using Traffix analysis software and is correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS

USING AVERAGE CONTROL VEHICULAR DELAY

Level of Service Description Average Control Delay Per

Vehicle (Seconds)

A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle lengths.

≤ 10.0

B

Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. > 10.0 and ≤ 20.0

C

Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. > 20.0 and ≤ 35.0

D

Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Many vehicles

stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. > 35.0 and ≤ 55.0

E

Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are

frequent occurrences. > 55.0 and ≤ 80.0

F Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over-saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths.

> 80.0

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000.

Unsignalized Intersections

Operations of the unsignalized study intersections (e.g., stop-sign controlled) were evaluated using the methodology contained in Chapter 17 of the 2000 HCM and calculated using the Traffix analysis software. LOS ratings for stop-sign controlled intersections are based on the average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. At two-way or side-street-stop controlled intersections, control delay is


5

calculated for each movement, not for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane. For all-way stop-controlled locations, a weighted average delay for the entire intersection is presented. Table 2 summarizes the relationship between delay and LOS for unsignalized intersections.

TABLE 2 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS

Level of Service Description Average Control Delay Per

Vehicle (Seconds)

A Little or no delay. ≤ 10.0

B Short traffic delays. 10.1 to 15.0

C Average traffic delays. 15.1 to 25.0

D Long traffic delays. 25.1 to 35.0

E Very long traffic delays. 35.1 to 50.0

F Extreme traffic delays with intersection capacity exceeded. > 50.0

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000.

EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE

Existing intersection lane configurations and peak-hour turning movement traffic volumes, collected in March 2010 and compiled in Appendix A, were used to determine the existing levels of service. The results of the LOS analysis are presented in Table 3. Appendix B contains the corresponding calculation sheets.

Measured against Imperial County’s standards, all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours.

TABLE 3 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE

Intersection Traffic Control Count Date

AM PM

Delay1 LOS Delay1 LOS

1. SR-111/Sinclair Road Side-Street Stop 3/16/2010 10.3 B 9.8 A

2. Blair Road/Sinclair Road Side-Street Stop 3/16/2010 8.6 A 8.6 A

3. Blair Road/Peterson Road Side-Street Stop 3/16/2010 10.4 B 9.8 A

4. Blair Road/SR-115 Side-Street Stop 3/16/2010 13.2 B 9.6 A

Notes: 1 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle calculated using methods described

in the 2000 HCM. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop-controlled intersections. 2 LOS = Level of service. LOS calculations conducted using the Traffix level of service analysis software package.

Unacceptable operations are shown in bold typeface.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2011


6

EXISTING SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS

The peak-hour signal warrant from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) was evaluated for the four unsignalized study intersections to determine if a traffic signal is warranted. The result of the peak-hour warrant analysis indicated that none of the intersections satisfy the minimum volume thresholds. In general, an unsignalized intersection with one lane in each direction would need a minimum of 400 peak hour trips in both the north-south and east-west directions. The peak-hour traffic that we collected for study intersections is below 400 peak hour trips in any direction.

EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE

Daily roadway segment data was obtained from the 2008 Caltrans Traffic Count Database. To evaluate existing conditions, a 2% compounded annual growth rate was applied to each roadway segment. This is consistent with Imperial County’s General Plan and EIR. We used the 2008 Caltrans Truck Traffic Report to identify the amount of truck traffic along each roadway segment, and applied a passenger car equivalency (PCE) factor of 2.0 to the number of estimated trucks. For SR-115, Caltrans did not provide truck traffic data at the study location; along nearby segments of SR-115, truck traffic comprises 30% of total ADT, so we made the assumption that a similar vehicle split would be found along the study roadway segments. Table 4 identifies existing roadway segment volumes and level of service for study roadway facilities.

TABLE 4 EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE

Roadway Segment Capacity (LOS C) ¹ ADT (2008) 2

Estimated Trucks3 PCE

Estimated Volume (2010) 4

Operates Acceptably?

SR-111

North of Sinclair Road 7,100 3,050 561 3,611 3,757 Yes

SR-115

East of Blair Road 7,100 1,150 345 1,495 1,555 Yes

West of Blair Road 7,100 1,150 345 1,495 1,555 Yes

Notes: 1 Capacity based on Imperial County General Plan for two-lane roadways 2 Data obtained from Caltrans traffic count database 3 Data obtained from Caltrans Truck Traffic Report (2008); estimated for SR-115 4 Growth rate of 2% per year applied to estimate 2010 traffic volumes



FIELD OBSERVATIONS

Field observations of the study intersections and roadway segments were conducted during in March 2010. The purpose of the field observations was to note roadway conditions, measure roadway widths, and identify any sight distance issues.

Pavement Condition

SR-111, SR-115, Blair Road, and Sinclair Road are all paved facilities, with pavement in good condition. However, the general plan designates all roadways to have an 8’ paved shoulder on either side. These


7

segments generally have a 4’ paved shoulder, with the exception of Sinclair Road, which has a 2’ paved shoulder. All of the aforementioned roadway segments have unpaved “soft” shoulders, which are a minimum of 5’ wide.

Sight Distance

We observed all intersection approaches to identify any sight distance issues. There is adequate sight distance at each approach. Table 5 provides some photographs of sight distance at study intersections.

TABLE 5 SIGHT DISTANCE AT AREA INTERSECTIONS

Intersection Photo 1 Photo 2

SR-111/ Sinclair Road

Blair Road/ Sinclair Road

Blair Road/ Peterson

Road

Blair Road/ SR-115



8

3. ANALYSIS PARAMETERS

This chapter outlines the geographic scope of the traffic impact analysis, including the study intersections and roadways, trip generation methodologies, and significance criteria employed in the study.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Calipatria Solar Farms 1 and 2, combined, would be bounded by Peterson Road to the north, Young Road to the south, and Blair Road to the east. Vehicles would take access to the site along Blair Road, where there would be project driveways at its intersections with Montgomery Road and Wilkinson Road. Lindsey Road would serve as a divider between Solar Farm 1 to the south and Solar Farm 2 to the north. Carrick Road, an abandoned north-south roadway, could also be used for project circulation. The Calipatria State Prison, one of the City’s major employers, is located adjacent to the project, near the intersection of Blair Road and Peterson Road.

The project assessment occurs in two phases: Construction and Operations & Maintenance (O&M). The construction phase would begin in 2011 and take less than a year. During this phase, personnel vehicles and delivery trucks carrying construction material would make visits to the site from 8:00am-5:00pm. The project would open in 2011 and would be staffed by a security guard 24 hours per day and four employees during regular business hours, who would maintain the solar panels.

PROJECT STUDY AREA

The project study area is bounded by Sinclair Road to the north, SR-115 to the south, Blair Road to the east, and SR-111 to the west. Roadway segments north of the SR-111/Sinclair Road and east of the Blair Road/SR-115 intersection are also included in the study area. The following intersections are included in the traffic impact analysis:

• SR-111/Sinclair Road

• Blair Road/Sinclair Road

• Blair Road/Peterson Road

• Blair Road/SR-115

The following roadway segments were also evaluated in this analysis:

• SR-111 north of Sinclair Road

• SR-115 west of Blair Road

• SR-115 east of Blair Road

PROJECT TRAFFIC ESTIMATES

The amount of traffic added to the roadway system by the proposed development is estimated using a three-step process: (1) trip generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. The first step estimates the amount of added traffic to the roadway network. The second step estimates the direction of travel to and from the project site. The trips are assigned to specific street segments and intersection turning movements during the third step. The results of the process for the proposed project are described in the following sections.


9

Trip Generation

Project impacts were assessed for two phases: Construction and Operations & Maintenance (O&M). The construction phase is planned to take place in 2011 and the project opening year is slated for 2012.

We received employment and trip generation estimates from 8minutenergy in March 2010. For the Construction phase, 8minutenergy supplied the number of personal vehicles and trucks that would be arriving or leaving the site at a given hour. We applied a PCE of 2.0 to all truck trips traveling to and from the project site.

For the O&M phase, 8minutenergy supplied the following personnel information for each project site:

• 3 on-site staff members performing O&M tasks during normal business hours

• 1 security guard during normal business hours

• 1 security guard during 2nd shift

• 1 security guard during 3rd shift

We anticipated that each day-shift staff member would have 4 daily trip ends – one to their respective project site at the start of the shift, one from that site at the end of the trip, and an additional discretionary trip to and from the site for deliveries or a lunch break. We assumed that all staff working the regular shift would arrive on site during the same peak hour, and leave during the same peak hour. The only staff members who would be working outside of regular business hours are the security personnel covering the second and third shift. Because the sites would remain unmanned in their absence, we assumed that these two employees would have two trip ends - one at the start of the shift and one at the end of the shift. The second shift security guard would arrive at the site during the PM peak hour, and the third shift security guard would leave the site during the AM peak hour.

The two projects will be located adjacent to one another with one access point, so trip generation estimates reflect the total project trips for the combined projects. Table 6 identifies the trip generation for the construction and O&M phases.

Trip Distribution

Trip distribution estimates were developed for both the Construction and O&M phases. Because both projects would be taking access from the same driveway, we assumed the same trip generation for each project. Construction estimates were based on the potential locations of suppliers and construction personnel. In the construction phase, 100% of trips would originate or be destined for areas north of the project sites using SR-111. Distribution estimates for the O&M phase were developed based on existing travel patterns in the area. During this phase, 70% of trips would originate or be destined to areas south or southwest, 10% east or southeast, and 20% north of the project sites.

Trip Assignment

Trips generated by the projects were assigned to the roadway system based on the directions of approach and departure discussed above. We assumed the following travel paths for trips, which would all access the site from the Blair Road/Montgomery Road intersection:

North of Project Site

• Travel along SR-111

• Exit/enter SR-111 at Sinclair Road


10

• Use Blair Road north of project site to access project

West/Southwest of Project Site

• Travel along SR-115 (west of Blair Road)

• Exit/enter SR-115 at Blair Road

• Use Blair Road south of project site to access project

East/Southeast of Project Site

• Travel along SR-115 (east of Blair Road)

• Exit/enter SR-115 at Blair Road

• Use Blair Road south of project site to access project

TABLE 6 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES AND ESTIMATES

Trip Type

Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

Total In Out Total In Out Total

Construction Vehicles¹ 308 100 0 100 0 100 100

Trucks 20 4 0 4 0 4 4

Total (with PCE applied)² 348 108 0 108 0 108 108

Operations & Maintenance

Vehicles 40 8 2 10 2 8 10

Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total (with PCE applied) 40 8 2 10 2 8 10

Notes: 1 Personnel and trip information supplied by 8minutenergy 2 PCE of 2.0 applied to all truck trips


PROJECT IMPACT CRITERIA

Imperial County identifies significance criteria within its traffic study guidelines (2007). Significant impacts occur when project traffic exceeds the thresholds identified in the Circulation and Scenic Highways element of the Imperial County General Plan, as described below.

Significant impacts at intersections are defined to occur when:

• The addition of project traffic causes intersection operations to degrade from an acceptable level (LOS C or better) to an unacceptable level (LOS D or worse)


11

• Project traffic is added to an intersection operating below LOS C

• If an intersection degrades from LOS B or better to LOS C, the project must note this for monitoring purposes

• Additionally, signal warrant analyses must be performed for all unsignalized intersections

Significant impacts at roadway segments are defined to occur when:

• The addition of project traffic causes roadway segment operations to degrade from an acceptable level (LOS C or better) to an unacceptable level (LOS D or worse)

• Project traffic is added to a roadway segment already operating below LOS C

Significant impacts at project access points occur when:

• Project designs for on-site circulation, access, and parking areas fail to meet industry standard design guidelines (consistent with CEQA guidelines)

• Project access creates sight-distance issues that may affect adjacent roadways


12

4. EXISTING PLUS CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ANALYSIS

This chapter presents the impacts of the proposed projects during the Construction phase on the surrounding roadway system. The Construction phase would occur in 2011, and is therefore being assessed against Existing conditions. Existing plus Construction conditions were evaluated during the weekday AM and PM peak periods at intersections and for daily conditions along roadway segments.

CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC

Construction trip generation, distribution, and assignment were described in Chapter 3. As noted in this chapter, there would be 108 passenger car equivalents (PCE) traveling to the site during the AM peak hour and 108 PCE traveling from the site during the PM peak hour for the combined projects. Over the course of the day, there would be a total of 348 PCE trip ends. All construction trips would be coming from or going to sites north of the project sites, and would travel along SR-111 north of Sinclair Road.

CONSTRUCTION PHASE INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE

Intersection levels of service were calculated with the new traffic added by the projects to evaluate the operating conditions and identify potential impacts to the local roadway system. The results of the intersection level of service calculations for Existing and Existing plus Construction Conditions are presented in Table 7. LOS calculation sheets are included in Appendix B.

As shown in Table 7, all intersections operate acceptably both with and without the addition of construction related traffic.

TABLE 7 EXISTING AND CONSTRUCTION INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE

Intersection Traffic Control

Existing Construction

AM PM AM PM

Delay1 LOS2 Delay LOS Delay1 LOS Delay LOS2

1. SR-111/Sinclair Road Side-Street Stop 10.3 B 9.8 A 12.8 B 11.1 B


Side-Street Stop 8.6 A 8.6 A 9.9 A 9.6 A


Side-Street Stop 10.4 B 9.8 A 11.7 B 11.0 B

4. Blair Road/SR-115 Side-Street Stop 13.2 B 9.6 A 13.2 B 9.6 A

Notes: 1 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle calculated using methods described in

the 2000 HCM. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop-controlled intersections. 2 LOS = Level of service. LOS calculations conducted using the Traffix level of service analysis software package.




13

PROJECT SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS

The peak-hour signal warrant from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) was evaluated for the four unsignalized study intersections to determine if a traffic signal would be warranted under Construction Conditions. The result of the peak-hour warrant analysis indicated that both intersections do not satisfy the minimum volume thresholds.

ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE

Roadway segment levels of service were calculated with the new traffic added by the project to evaluate the operating conditions and identify potential impacts to the local roadway system. The results of the intersection level of service calculations for Existing and Existing plus Construction Conditions are presented in Table 8.

TABLE 8 EXISTING AND CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE

Roadway Segment Capacity (LOS C) ¹

Existing Volume (2010)


Construction Traffic (in PCE)

Existing + Construction

Volume Operates

Acceptably?

SR-111

North of Sinclair Road 7,100 3,757 Yes 348 4,102 Yes

SR-115

East of Blair Road 7,100 1,555 Yes 0 1,555 Yes

West of Blair Road 7,100 1,555 Yes 0 1,555 Yes

Notes: 1 Capacity based on Imperial County General Plan for two-lane roadways



As shown in this table, roadway segments will continue to operate acceptably with the addition of construction traffic to the project site.


Intersection Impacts

The project construction phase for the combined projects adds 108 peak hour PCE trips during both the AM and PM peak hours. All study intersections continue to operate acceptably with the addition of construction traffic. Additionally, no intersections meet peak hour signal warrants. Therefore, intersection impacts are less than significant and no mitigation is warranted.

Roadway Segment Impacts

The projects’ construction phase adds 348 PCE trips over the course of the average weekday. All roadway segments currently operate acceptably, and will continue to operate above LOS C with the addition of project traffic. Therefore, roadway segment impacts are less than significant and no mitigation is warranted.


14

PROPOSED SITE ACCESS

As proposed, a project driveway would be located at the intersection of Montgomery Road and Blair Road. This access point would serve both solar farms. Carrick Road, an abandoned roadway which runs north-south, divides each solar farm into an east and west portion. Currently, neither Montgomery Road nor Carrick Road is paved. Additionally, there is a sign marking no through access along Montgomery Road, and portions of Carrick Road are restricted to vehicles.

The width of the unpaved roads is approximately 24’. This is wide enough to allow vehicular travel in both directions. The project’s impacts to site access are therefore less than significant and no mitigation is warranted.


The project is composed of two proposed solar farms, with no tall structures that would block sight distance for those traveling proximate to the project site. Currently, no sight distance issues exist near the project sites or at any project study facilities. Therefore, sight distance impacts associated with the projects are less than significant and no mitigation is warranted.


15

5. PROJECT OPENING YEAR (2012) IMPACT ANALYSIS

This chapter discusses traffic conditions during the Project Opening Year (2011) with and without the proposed projects. During the opening year, project traffic would consist of Operations & Maintenance (O&M) staff and site security guards. Opening Year conditions reflect anticipated traffic operations after background growth.

BACKGROUND GROWTH

A compounded annual growth rate of 2% was applied to all traffic count volumes at study intersections and along roadway segments. This is consistent with the Imperial County’s Circulation & Scenic Highways Element for roadways below 25,000 ADT. Additionally, there are currently four solar farms that are planned to be under construction in 2012. We applied the traffic generated by these projects to the study facilities.

OPENING YEAR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS

No roadway improvements were included under Opening Year (2012).

PROJECT TRAFFIC

Project trip generation, distribution, and assignment were described in Chapter 3. As noted in this chapter, there would be 10 project trip ends during the AM peak hour (8 in, 2 out) and 10 project trip ends traveling from the site during the PM peak hour (2 in, 8 out). Over the course of the day, there would be a total of 40 project trip ends. 70% of trips would eventually travel along SR-115 west of the site, 10% along SR-115 east of the site, and 20% along SR-111 north of the site.

OPENING YEAR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE

Intersection operations were evaluated with level of service calculations under Opening Year (2012) and Opening Year (2012) with Project Conditions. Results are summarized in Table 9.

As shown in Table 9, all intersections continue to operate acceptably with the addition of projects’ traffic.

OPENING YEAR SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS

The peak-hour signal warrant from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) was evaluated for all study intersections to determine if the installation of a traffic signal is warranted. The result of the peak-hour warrant analysis indicated that none of the intersections warrant a traffic signal under Opening Year or Opening Year with Project scenarios, since these scenarios do not meet minimum traffic volumes for a signal to be necessary.


16


Roadway segment levels of service were calculated with the new traffic added by the projects to evaluate the operating conditions and identify potential impacts to the local roadway system. As previously noted, a 2% annual growth rate was applied to the roadway segments to obtain Opening Year (No Project) volumes. Project traffic was then assigned to the roadway segments. The results of the roadway segment level of service calculations for Opening Year and Opening Year plus Project Conditions are presented in Table 10.

TABLE 10 OPENING YEAR ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE


Opening Year Volume (2012)


Project Traffic

Opening Year Plus Project Volume


SR-111


SR-115





Source: Fehr & Peers, 2011.

As shown in this table, roadway segments will continue to operate acceptably with and without the addition of project traffic.

TABLE 9 OPENING YEAR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE


Opening Year Opening Year plus Project

AM PM AM PM


1. SR-111/Sinclair Road Side-Street Stop 16.4 C 10.1 B 16.5 C 10.1 B




Side-Street Stop 10.5 B 9.9 A 10.5 B 9.9 A

4. Blair Road/SR-115 Side-Street Stop 15.4 C 10.0 B 15.7 C 10.0 B






17



The projects’ O&M phase adds 10 peak hour trips during both the AM and PM peak hours. However, all study intersections continue to operate acceptably with the addition of project traffic. Additionally, no intersections meet peak hour signal warrants. Therefore, intersection impacts are less than significant and no mitigation measures are warranted.


The projects’ O&M phase adds 40 daily trips. All roadway segments currently operate acceptably, and will continue to operate at LOS C or better with the addition of project traffic. Therefore, roadway segment impacts are less than significant and no mitigation measures are warranted.


As proposed, project driveways would be located at the intersections of Blair Road & Wilkinson Road for Calipatria Solar Farm I and Blair Road & Montgomery Road for Calipatria Solar Farm II. Carrick Road, an abandoned roadway which runs north-south, divides each solar farm into an east and west portion. Currently, Wilkinson Road, Montgomery Road and Carrick Road are unpaved. Additionally, there is a sign marking no through access along Montgomery Road, and portions of Carrick Road are restricted to vehicles.





18

6. YEAR 2030 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS

This chapter discusses cumulative traffic conditions both with and without the proposed projects. Year 2035 Cumulative Conditions reflect traffic conditions after the development of all approved, pending, and foreseeable projects in the study area plus regional growth over the next 20 years.

YEAR 2030 CUMULATIVE VOLUMES

The Imperial County General Plan contains traffic forecasts through year 2025, which were projected using the CalexGP+ Model. The County’s traffic study guidelines require a 2030 cumulative year. In absence of County-specified traffic forecasts, we applied a 2% annual growth rate to all study intersections and roadway segments, consistent with the forecasting method used by the CalexGP+ model.

Additionally, we included Operations and Management (O&M) phase traffic from related solar farms near the project site. There are currently four solar farms that are planned to be operating prior to 2030. We applied the traffic generated by these projects to the study facilities.

CUMULATIVE YEAR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS

No roadway improvements were included under Year 2030 Cumulative Conditions. The Imperial County General Plan recommends the widening of Blair Road between Peterson and SR-115 from 2-lanes to 4-lanes and Sinclair Road west of SR-111 from 2-lanes to 6-lanes, both by 2050. Since it is unclear whether these improvements would occur prior to year 2030, we maintained a conservative analysis by not including these improvements.

PROJECT TRAFFIC

Project trip generation, distribution, and assignment were described in Chapter 3. As noted in this chapter, there would be 10 project trip ends during the AM peak hour (8 in, 2 out) and 10 project trip ends traveling from the site during the PM peak hour (2 in, 8 out). Over the course of the day, there would be a total of 40 project trip ends. 70% of trips would eventually travel along SR-115 west of the site, 10% along SR-115 east of the site, and 20% along SR-111 north of the site.

YEAR 2030 CUMULATIVE INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE

Intersection operations were evaluated with level of service calculations under Cumulative Year (2030) and Cumulative Year (2030) with Project Conditions. Results are summarized in Table 11.

As shown in Table 11, all intersections continue to operate acceptably with the addition of project traffic. It should be noted that under Cumulative Conditions, both with and without Project, Blair Road/SR-115 operates at LOS C.

CUMULATIVE YEAR SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS

The peak-hour signal warrant from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) was evaluated for all study intersections to determine if the installation of a traffic signal is warranted. The result of the peak-hour warrant analysis indicated that none of the intersections warrant a traffic signal under Cumulative Year or Cumulative Year with Project scenarios, since these scenarios do not meet minimum traffic volumes for a signal to be necessary.


19


Roadway segment levels of service were calculated with the new traffic added by the projects to evaluate the operating conditions and identify potential impacts to the local roadway system. As previously noted, a 2% annual growth rate was applied to the roadway segments to obtain Cumulative Year (No Project) volumes. Project traffic was then assigned to the roadway segments. The results of the roadway segment level of service calculations for Cumulative Year and Cumulative Year plus Project Conditions are presented in Table 12.

TABLE 12 CUMULATIVE YEAR (2030) ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE


Cumulative Year Volume

(2030) Operates

Acceptably? Project Traffic

Cumulative Year Plus Project

Volume Operates

Acceptably?

SR-111


SR-115





Source: Fehr & Peers, 2010.

TABLE 11 CUMULATIVE YEAR (2030) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE


Cumulative Year Cumulative Year plus Project

AM PM AM PM


1. SR-111/Sinclair Road Side-Street Stop 11.5 B 11.6 B 11.5 B 11.6 B




Side-Street Stop 11.8 B 10.6 B 11.8 B 10.7 B

4. Blair Road/SR-115 Side-Street Stop 21.0 C 10.7 B 21.6 C 10.8 B






20

As shown in this table, roadway segments will continue to operate acceptably with and without the addition of project traffic.



The project O&M phase adds 10 peak hour trips during both the AM and PM peak hours. All study intersections continue to operate acceptably with the addition of project traffic under Cumulative (2030) conditions. Additionally, no intersections meet peak hour signal warrants. Therefore, intersection impacts are less than significant and no mitigation is warranted.


The project O&M phase adds 40 daily trips. All roadway segments will continue to operate acceptably under Cumulative (2030) conditions, and will continue to operate above LOS C with the addition of project traffic. Therefore, roadway segment impacts are less than significant and no mitigation is warranted.


As proposed, project driveways would be located at the intersections of Blair Road & Wilkinson Road for Calipatria Solar Farm I and Blair Road & Montgomery Road for Calipatria Solar Farm II. Carrick Road, an abandoned roadway which runs north-south, divides each solar farm into an east and west portion. Currently, Wilkinson Road, Montgomery Road and Carrick Road are unpaved. Additionally, there is a sign marking no through access along Montgomery Road, and portions of Carrick Road are restricted to vehicles.




APPENDIX A: EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS

Intersection Turning MovementPrepared by:

National Data & Surveying Services

N-S STREET: DATE: 03/16/2010 LOCATION:

E-W STREET: DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT#

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL

LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

7:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 AM 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 67:30 AM 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 87:45 AM 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 118:00 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 68:15 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 58:30 AM 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 2 1 108:45 AM 0 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 2 0 89:00 AM

TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTALVOLUMES = 8 7 1 1 13 1 2 3 18 1 0 0 55

nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d16 9 15 32 23 5 1 9

745 AM

PEAKVOLUMES = 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0 32

PEAK HR.FACTOR: 0.727

CONTROL:

EASTBOUND

0.625 0.583 0.583

2-Way Stop (EB/WB)

AM Peak Hr Begins at:

City of Calipatria

0.250

WESTBOUND

Blair Rd

Sinclair Rd

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND

10-4089-002






LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

4:00 PM 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 44:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 34:30 PM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 34:45 PM 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 65:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 35:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 25:45 PM 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 46:00 PM



400 PM

PEAKVOLUMES = 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 16


CONTROL:

10-4089-002

PM Peak Hr Begins at:

City of Calipatria

0.000

WESTBOUND

Blair Rd

Sinclair Rd

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND

0.583 0.500 0.625

2-Way Stop (EB/WB)



N-S STREET: DATE: LOCATION:

E-W STREET: DAY: NEED DATE PROJECT#


LANES:

12:00 AM 12:15 AM12:30 AM12:45 AM1:00 AM1:15 AM1:30 AM1:45 AM2:00 AM2:15 AM2:30 AM2:45 AM3:00 AM3:15 AM3:30 AM3:45 AM4:00 AM4:15 AM4:30 AM4:45 AM5:00 AM5:15 AM5:30 AM5:45 AM6:00 AM6:15 AM6:30 AM6:45 AM7:00 AM7:15 AM7:30 AM7:45 AM8:00 AM8:15 AM8:30 AM8:45 AM9:00 AM9:15 AM9:30 AM9:45 AM

10:00 AM10:15 AM10:30 AM10:45 AM11:00 AM11:15 AM11:30 AM11:45 AM12:00 PM12:15 PM12:30 PM12:45 PM1:00 PM1:15 PM1:30 PM1:45 PM2:00 PM2:15 PM2:30 PM2:45 PM3:00 PM3:15 PM3:30 PM3:45 PM4:00 PM4:15 PM4:30 PM4:45 PM5:00 PM5:15 PM5:30 PM5:45 PM6:00 PM6:15 PM6:30 PM6:45 PM7:00 PM7:15 PM7:30 PM7:45 PM8:00 PM8:15 PM8:30 PM8:45 PM9:00 PM9:15 PM9:30 PM9:45 PM

10:00 PM10:15 PM10:30 PM10:45 PM11:00 PM11:15 PM11:30 PM11:45 PM



0 AM

PEAKVOLUMES = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


CONTROL:

NOON Peak Hr Begins at:

0.000

WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND

0.000 0.000 0.000



0 1 0 Lanes N

0 7 0 AM

0 0 0 NOON

0 3 1 PM

Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM

0 1 0 1 0 0 0

1 3 0 1 0 0 0

0 10 0 3 1 0 0

4 5 1 AM

0 0 0 NOON

4 2 1 PM

745 AMAM Peak Hour:

PM Peak Hour:

NOON Peak Hour:

400 PM

End:

9:00 AM7:00 AM

Northbound Approach

0 1 0 Lanes

PM

12:00 AM 12:00 AM

4:00 PM 6:00 PM

AM

NOON

Count Periods Start:

Blair Rd and Sinclair Rd , City of Calipatria

10-4089-002

Ea

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

Peak Hour Summary

Southbound Approach Project #:3/16/2010Date:

Control: 2-Way Stop (EB/WB)

Bla

ir R

d

Sinclair Rd

TuesdayDay:

We

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

Lanes

0

1

0



IN OUT N

7 6 13 AM

0 0 0 NOON

4 3 7 PM

AM NOON PM AM NOON PM

18 0 9 5 0 3

IN 14 0 5 1 0 0

OUT 4 0 4 4 0 3

10 18 28 AM

0 0 0 NOON

7 6 13 PM

Blair Rd and Sinclair Rd , City of Calipatria

Project #: 10-4089-002

745 AM

Total IN & OUT

IN / OUT Peak Hour Summary

AM Peak Hour:

NOON Peak Hour:

400 PM

PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM

NOON

Total IN & OUT

IN

OUT

End:

PM Peak Hour:

Southbound Approach

Bla

ir R

d

Sinclair Rd

Date:

Day:

3/16/2010

Tuesday

Ea

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

hControl:

Total IN & OUT

We

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

2-Way Stop (EB/WB)

12:00 AM 12:00 AM

AM 7:00 AM 9:00 AM


Northbound Approach

IN OUTTotal IN &

OUT






LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

7:00 AM 18 3 0 217:15 AM 31 4 0 357:30 AM 79 5 0 847:45 AM 74 5 0 798:00 AM 28 4 1 338:15 AM 26 5 0 318:30 AM 19 9 0 288:45 AM 2 3 0 59:00 AM



715 AM

PEAKVOLUMES = 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 231


CONTROL:

EASTBOUND

0.671 0.900 0.000

1-Way Stop (WB)


City of Calipatria

0.250

WESTBOUND

Blair Rd

Peterson Rd


10-4089-003






LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

4:00 PM 1 59 1 614:15 PM 4 36 1 414:30 PM 2 42 0 444:45 PM 2 11 1 145:00 PM 1 15 0 165:15 PM 1 8 0 95:30 PM 1 1 0 25:45 PM 2 6 0 86:00 PM



400 PM

PEAKVOLUMES = 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 160


CONTROL:

10-4089-003


City of Calipatria

0.750

WESTBOUND

Blair Rd

Peterson Rd


0.563 0.627 0.000

1-Way Stop (WB)



0 1 0 Lanes N

0 18 0 AM

0 0 0 NOON

0 148 0 PM


0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 0 3

0 212 0 AM

0 0 0 NOON

0 9 0 PM

715 AMAM Peak Hour:

PM Peak Hour:

NOON Peak Hour:

400 PM

End:

9:00 AM7:00 AM

Northbound Approach

0 1 0 Lanes

PM

12:00 AM 12:00 AM

4:00 PM 6:00 PM

AM

NOON


Blair Rd and Peterson Rd , City of Calipatria

10-4089-003

Ea

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

Peak Hour Summary


Control: 1-Way Stop (WB)

Bla

ir R

d

Peterson Rd

TuesdayDay:

We

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

Lanes

0

1

0



IN OUT N

18 212 230 AM

0 0 0 NOON

148 9 157 PM


0 0 0 1 0 3

IN 0 0 0 1 0 3

OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0

212 19 231 AM

0 0 0 NOON

9 151 160 PM

Blair Rd and Peterson Rd , City of Calipatria

Project #: 10-4089-003

715 AM

Total IN & OUT


AM Peak Hour:

NOON Peak Hour:

400 PM

PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM

NOON

Total IN & OUT

IN

OUT

End:

PM Peak Hour:

Southbound Approach

Bla

ir R

d

Peterson Rd

Date:

Day:

3/16/2010

Tuesday

Ea

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

hControl:

Total IN & OUT

We

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

1-Way Stop (WB)

12:00 AM 12:00 AM

AM 7:00 AM 9:00 AM


Northbound Approach

IN OUTTotal IN &

OUT






LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0

7:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 20 8 0 0 5 1 367:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 1 23 6 0 0 5 6 437:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 4 47 7 0 0 4 12 757:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 4 68 10 0 0 4 10 978:00 AM 0 0 1 1 0 5 31 13 0 2 9 2 648:15 AM 1 0 0 2 1 7 18 9 1 0 6 3 488:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 5 10 9 1 0 5 5 378:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 0 0 3 2 149:00 AM



730 AM

PEAKVOLUMES = 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27 284


CONTROL:

EASTBOUND

1.000 0.600 0.654

2-Way Stop (NB/SB)


City of Calipatria

0.813

WESTBOUND

Blair Rd

SR-115


10-4089-004






LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0

4:00 PM 0 0 1 10 1 55 2 6 1 19 0 954:15 PM 0 0 0 7 3 31 3 9 0 7 2 624:30 PM 0 1 0 4 0 46 1 8 1 13 0 744:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 8 1 6 0 11 0 275:00 PM 1 0 0 2 0 10 1 11 0 17 1 435:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 8 2 3 0 14 0 295:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 4 2 4 0 12 0 235:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 4 1 8 1 5 1 226:00 PM



400 PM

PEAKVOLUMES = 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2 258


CONTROL:

10-4089-004


City of Calipatria

0.684

WESTBOUND

Blair Rd

SR-115


0.500 0.629 0.792

2-Way Stop (NB/SB)



0 1 0 Lanes N

20 1 3 AM

0 0 0 NOON

140 4 22 PM


1 164 0 7 27 0 2

1 39 0 29 23 0 50

0 1 0 2 2 0 0

2 1 1 AM

0 0 0 NOON

0 1 1 PM

730 AMAM Peak Hour:

PM Peak Hour:

NOON Peak Hour:

400 PM

End:

9:00 AM7:00 AM

Northbound Approach

0 1 0 Lanes

PM

12:00 AM 12:00 AM

4:00 PM 6:00 PM

AM

NOON


Blair Rd and SR-115 , City of Calipatria

10-4089-004

Ea

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

Peak Hour Summary


Control: 2-Way Stop (NB/SB)

Bla

ir R

d

SR-115

TuesdayDay:

We

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

Lanes

0

1

1



IN OUT N

24 192 216 AM

0 0 0 NOON

166 10 176 PM


249 0 228 95 0 104

IN 204 0 38 52 0 52

OUT 45 0 190 43 0 52

4 4 8 AM

0 0 0 NOON

2 6 8 PM

Blair Rd and SR-115 , City of Calipatria

Project #: 10-4089-004

730 AM

Total IN & OUT


AM Peak Hour:

NOON Peak Hour:

400 PM

PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM

NOON

Total IN & OUT

IN

OUT

End:

PM Peak Hour:

Southbound Approach

Bla

ir R

d

SR-115

Date:

Day:

3/16/2010

Tuesday

Ea

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

hControl:

Total IN & OUT

We

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

2-Way Stop (NB/SB)

12:00 AM 12:00 AM

AM 7:00 AM 9:00 AM


Northbound Approach

IN OUTTotal IN &

OUT






LANES: 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

7:00 AM 0 8 0 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 197:15 AM 2 16 0 3 16 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 417:30 AM 2 15 0 2 32 4 0 0 0 0 3 2 607:45 AM 0 19 0 4 35 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 648:00 AM 1 18 0 2 38 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 648:15 AM 3 20 0 1 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 528:30 AM 0 18 1 1 34 3 5 1 0 1 0 3 678:45 AM 2 23 1 0 37 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 659:00 AM



800 AM

PEAKVOLUMES = 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5 248


CONTROL:

EASTBOUND

0.837 0.900 0.417

2-Way Stop (EB/WB)


City of Calipatria

0.438

WESTBOUND

SR-111

Sinclair Rd


10-4089-001






LANES: 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

4:00 PM 1 44 1 18 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 704:15 PM 0 39 1 24 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 694:30 PM 0 34 0 28 0 3 1 2 0 2 2 724:45 PM 1 30 0 27 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 635:00 PM 0 26 0 25 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 575:15 PM 1 33 3 17 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 615:30 PM 0 35 1 21 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 625:45 PM 0 37 0 22 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 676:00 PM



400 PM

PEAKVOLUMES = 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 9 274


CONTROL:

10-4089-001


City of Calipatria

0.750

WESTBOUND

SR-111

Sinclair Rd


0.828 0.920 0.417

2-Way Stop (EB/WB)



N-S STREET: DATE: LOCATION:

E-W STREET: DAY: NEED DATE PROJECT#


LANES:

12:00 AM 12:15 AM12:30 AM12:45 AM1:00 AM1:15 AM1:30 AM1:45 AM2:00 AM2:15 AM2:30 AM2:45 AM3:00 AM3:15 AM3:30 AM3:45 AM4:00 AM4:15 AM4:30 AM4:45 AM5:00 AM5:15 AM5:30 AM5:45 AM6:00 AM6:15 AM6:30 AM6:45 AM7:00 AM7:15 AM7:30 AM7:45 AM8:00 AM8:15 AM8:30 AM8:45 AM9:00 AM9:15 AM9:30 AM9:45 AM

10:00 AM10:15 AM10:30 AM10:45 AM11:00 AM11:15 AM11:30 AM11:45 AM12:00 PM12:15 PM12:30 PM12:45 PM1:00 PM1:15 PM1:30 PM1:45 PM2:00 PM2:15 PM2:30 PM2:45 PM3:00 PM3:15 PM3:30 PM3:45 PM4:00 PM4:15 PM4:30 PM4:45 PM5:00 PM5:15 PM5:30 PM5:45 PM6:00 PM6:15 PM6:30 PM6:45 PM7:00 PM7:15 PM7:30 PM7:45 PM8:00 PM8:15 PM8:30 PM8:45 PM9:00 PM9:15 PM9:30 PM9:45 PM

10:00 PM10:15 PM10:30 PM10:45 PM11:00 PM11:15 PM11:30 PM11:45 PM



0 AM

PEAKVOLUMES = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


CONTROL:

NOON Peak Hr Begins at:

0.000

WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND

0.000 0.000 0.000



0 1 1 Lanes N

3 137 4 AM

0 0 0 NOON

4 97 2 PM


0 6 0 7 5 0 9

1 3 0 1 0 0 2

0 1 0 2 2 0 1

6 79 2 AM

0 0 0 NOON

2 147 0 PM

800 AMAM Peak Hour:

PM Peak Hour:

NOON Peak Hour:

400 PM

End:

9:00 AM7:00 AM

Northbound Approach

1 1 0 Lanes

PM

12:00 AM 12:00 AM

4:00 PM 6:00 PM

AM

NOON


SR-111 and Sinclair Rd , City of Calipatria

10-4089-001

Ea

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

Peak Hour Summary


Control: 2-Way Stop (EB/WB)

SR

-111

Sinclair Rd

TuesdayDay:

We

stb

ou

nd

Ap

pro

ac

h

Lanes

0

1

0

APPENDIX B: RELATED PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT

APPENDIX C: INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS

COMPARE Wed Mar 24 12:32:55 2010 Page 2-1

Traffix 7.9.0215 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to F & P, INLAND EMPIRE

Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)

Existing AM

Intersection #1: Sinclair/SR-111 Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Initial Vol: 3 137 4

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 3/16/2010 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol:

6

0

Cycle Time (sec): 100 0

5

0

Loss Time (sec): 0 0

3 1!

Critical V/C: 0.000 1! 0

0

Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 1.0 0

1 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 1.0 0 2

LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 6 79 2

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound

Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 8am-9am

Base Vol: 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93

PHF Volume: 6 85 2 4 148 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 6 85 2 4 148 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2

FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 151 xxxx xxxxx 88 xxxx xxxxx 261 259 150 260 259 86

Potent Cap.: 1442 xxxx xxxxx 1521 xxxx xxxxx 696 649 902 697 648 978

Move Cap.: 1442 xxxx xxxxx 1521 xxxx xxxxx 689 644 902 690 644 978

Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Level Of Service Module:

2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

Control Del: 7.5 xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * *

Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT

Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 691 xxxxx xxxx 873 xxxxx

SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.3 xxxxx xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx

Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * A *

ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.3 9.2

ApproachLOS: * * B A

Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report

********************************************************************************

Intersection #1 Sinclair/SR-111

********************************************************************************

Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]

Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]

FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=10]

FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=248]

FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection

with less than four approaches.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER

This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an

"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting

a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant

are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based

signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace

a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible

jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond

the scope of this software, may yield different results.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]

********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Major Street Volume: 231

Minor Approach Volume: 10

Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 790

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














Existing PM


Initial Vol: 4 97 2

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


7

0


9

0


1 1!


0


2 0


LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00 PM

Base Vol: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 9

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 9

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 9

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95

PHF Volume: 2 155 0 2 102 4 7 1 2 1 2 9

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 2 155 0 2 102 4 7 1 2 1 2 9

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * *





Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * A *





********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 9


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 9

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














E+C AM



Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


6

0


5

0


3 1!


0


1 0


LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 6 79 2




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 8am-9am

Base Vol: 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

Added Vol: 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 6 79 2 58 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93

PHF Volume: 6 85 2 63 148 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 6 85 2 63 148 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * *





Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * A *





********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 6 79 2 58 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 6 79 2 58 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














E+C PM


Initial Vol: 4 97 2

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


7

0


63

0


1 1!


0


2 0


LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00 PM

Base Vol: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 9

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 9

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 63

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95

PHF Volume: 2 155 0 2 102 4 7 1 2 1 2 66

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 2 155 0 2 102 4 7 1 2 1 2 66

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * *





Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * A *





********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 63


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 63

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














Existing AM

Intersection #2: Sinclair/Blair Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Initial Vol: 0 7 0

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


1

0


0

0


3 1!


0


10 0


LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 4 5 1


Street Name: Blair Sinclair



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 7:45AM-8:45AM

Base Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73

PHF Volume: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 14 1 0 0

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 14 1 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx xxxxx

FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 10 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 28 29 10 37 xxxx xxxxx

Potent Cap.: 1623 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 986 868 1078 973 xxxx xxxxx

Move Cap.: 1623 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 984 865 1078 955 xxxx xxxxx

Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 xxxx xxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx

Control Del: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx

LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * A * *


Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1017 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shared LOS: * * * * * * * A * * * *


ApproachLOS: * * A A



********************************************************************************

Intersection #2 Sinclair/Blair

********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














Existing PM


Initial Vol: 0 3 1

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


1

0


0

0


1 1!


0


3 0


LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 4 2 1





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00PM

Base Vol: 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67

PHF Volume: 6 3 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 0 0

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 6 3 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * *



SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shared LOS: * * * A * * * A * * * *

ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx

ApproachLOS: * * A *



********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














E+C AM


Initial Vol: 0 7 0

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


1

0


0

0


3 1!


0


64 0


LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 4 5 1





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 7:45AM-8:45AM

Base Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 64 1 0 0

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73

PHF Volume: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 88 1 0 0

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 88 1 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx xxxxx

FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 10 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 28 29 10 74 xxxx xxxxx

Potent Cap.: 1623 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 986 868 1078 921 xxxx xxxxx

Move Cap.: 1623 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 984 865 1078 840 xxxx xxxxx

Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 xxxx xxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx

Control Del: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxx xxxxx

LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * A * *



SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shared LOS: * * * * * * * A * * * *


ApproachLOS: * * A A



********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 64 1 0 0


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 64 1 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














E+C PM


Initial Vol: 0 3 1

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


1

0


0

0


1 1!


0


3 0


LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 58 2 1





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Base Vol: 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0

Added Vol: 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 58 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67

PHF Volume: 87 3 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 0 0

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 87 3 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * *



SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shared LOS: * * * A * * * A * * * *


ApproachLOS: * * A *



********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 58 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 58 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














Existing AM

Intersection #3: Peterson/Blair Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Initial Vol: 0 18 0

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0

0


0

0


0 1!


0


0 0


LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0



Street Name: Blair Peterson



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Volume Module: >> Count Date: 18 Mar 2010 << 7:15-8:15AM

Base Vol: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69

PHF Volume: 0 308 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 0 308 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 xxxx xxxxx

FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 334 334 26 334 xxxx xxxxx

Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 623 589 1055 665 xxxx xxxxx

Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 623 589 1055 665 xxxx xxxxx

Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx

Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.4 xxxx xxxxx

LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * *



SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *

ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.4

ApproachLOS: * * * B



********************************************************************************

Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair

********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














Existing PM



Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0

0


0

0


0 1!


0


0 0


LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 9 0





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Base Vol: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66

PHF Volume: 0 14 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 5 0 0

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 0 14 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 5 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * *





Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *


ApproachLOS: * * * A



********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














E+C AM


Initial Vol: 0 72 0

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0

0


0

0


0 1!


0


0 0


LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0






------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Base Vol: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 0 212 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69

PHF Volume: 0 308 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 0 308 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * *





Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *





********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 212 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 1 0 0


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 212 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














E+C PM



Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0

0


0

0


0 1!


0


0 0


LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 63 0





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Base Vol: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Added Vol: 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 0 63 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66

PHF Volume: 0 96 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 5 0 0

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 0 96 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 5 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * *





Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *





********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 63 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 63 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














Existing AM

Intersection #4: SR-115/Blair Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Initial Vol: 20 1 3

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Signal=Uncontrol


164

1


27

0


39 0

Critical V/C: 0.000 0 23

1


1 0


LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 2 1 1

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Street Name: Blair SR-115



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Base Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73

PHF Volume: 3 1 1 4 1 27 224 53 1 3 31 37

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 3 1 1 4 1 27 224 53 1 3 31 37

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx

FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 572 576 54 559 558 50 68 xxxx xxxxx 55 xxxx xxxxx

Potent Cap.: 434 431 1019 443 441 1024 1546 xxxx xxxxx 1563 xxxx xxxxx

Move Cap.: 374 368 1019 392 376 1024 1546 xxxx xxxxx 1563 xxxx xxxxx

Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.14 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 0.5 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx

Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.6 7.7 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx

LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * A * *


Shared Cap.: xxxx 442 xxxxx 388 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 13.2 xxxxx 14.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shared LOS: * B * B * * * * * * * *

ApproachDel: 13.2 9.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx

ApproachLOS: B A * *



********************************************************************************

Intersection #4 SR-115/Blair

********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign]


FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach.


FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














Existing PM



Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Signal=Uncontrol


7

1


2

0


29 0


1


2 0


LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 1 1





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Base Vol: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68

PHF Volume: 0 1 1 32 6 206 10 43 3 0 74 3

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 0 1 1 32 6 206 10 43 3 0 74 3

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Critical Gp:xxxxx 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

FollowUpTim:xxxxx 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx 141 44 141 141 75 77 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

Potent Cap.: xxxx 753 1032 833 753 992 1535 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

Move Cap.: xxxx 748 1032 826 748 992 1535 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

Volume/Cap: xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.21 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.8 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.6 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * * * *


Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx 867 813 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx 0.0 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx 9.2 9.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shared LOS: * * A A * * * * * * * *


ApproachLOS: A A * *



********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





SUCCEED - Approach volume >= 150 for two or more lane approach.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














E+C AM


Initial Vol: 20 1 3

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Signal=Uncontrol


164

1


27

0


39 0


1


1 0


LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 2 1 1





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Base Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73

PHF Volume: 3 1 1 4 1 27 224 53 1 3 31 37

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 3 1 1 4 1 27 224 53 1 3 31 37

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx

FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 572 576 54 559 558 50 68 xxxx xxxxx 55 xxxx xxxxx

Potent Cap.: 434 431 1019 443 441 1024 1546 xxxx xxxxx 1563 xxxx xxxxx

Move Cap.: 374 368 1019 392 376 1024 1546 xxxx xxxxx 1563 xxxx xxxxx

Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.14 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 0.5 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx

Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.6 7.7 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx

LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * A * *


Shared Cap.: xxxx 442 xxxxx 388 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 13.2 xxxxx 14.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shared LOS: * B * B * * * * * * * *


ApproachLOS: B A * *



********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------














E+C PM



Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Signal=Uncontrol


7

1


2

0


29 0


1


2 0


LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Initial Vol: 0 1 1





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Base Vol: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2

Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Initial Bse: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2

Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Initial Fut: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2

User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

PHF Adj: 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68

PHF Volume: 0 1 1 32 6 206 10 43 3 0 74 3

Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FinalVolume: 0 1 1 32 6 206 10 43 3 0 74 3

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Critical Gp:xxxxx 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

FollowUpTim:xxxxx 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|

Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx 141 44 141 141 75 77 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

Potent Cap.: xxxx 753 1032 833 753 992 1535 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

Move Cap.: xxxx 748 1032 826 748 992 1535 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

Volume/Cap: xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.21 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.8 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.6 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * * * *


Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx 867 813 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx

SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx 0.0 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx 9.2 9.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx

Shared LOS: * * A A * * * * * * * *


ApproachLOS: A A * *



********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************




------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





SUCCEED - Approach volume >= 150 for two or more lane approach.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












********************************************************************************


********************************************************************************


------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|


Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

Initial Vol: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2

------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------











COMPARE Wed Jan 12 09:54:16 2011 Page 3-1


Calipatria Solar Farm IE10-0037

Opening Year (PM)


2012 AM

Intersection #1: Sinclair/SR-111 Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include Initial Vol: 16 143 112 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 3/16/2010 Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 6

0


5

0


3 1!


0


1 0


LOS: C

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 101 82 2 Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 8:00-9:00AM Base Vol: 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 6 82 2 4 143 3 6 3 1 2 0 5 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 95 0 0 108 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 101 82 2 112 143 16 6 3 1 2 0 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 109 89 2 121 154 17 7 3 1 2 0 6 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 109 89 2 121 154 17 7 3 1 2 0 6 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 172 xxxx xxxxx 91 xxxx xxxxx 717 715 163 716 723 90 Potent Cap.: 1418 xxxx xxxxx 1517 xxxx xxxxx 347 359 887 348 355 973 Move Cap.: 1418 xxxx xxxxx 1517 xxxx xxxxx 305 304 887 304 301 973 Volume/Cap: 0.08 xxxx xxxx 0.08 xxxx xxxx 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.3 xxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 326 xxxxx xxxx 598 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 16.4 xxxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.4 11.1 ApproachLOS: * * C B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Sinclair/SR-111 ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 101 82 2 112 143 16 6 3 1 2 0 5 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.4 11.1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=10] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=474] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=7] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=474] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Sinclair/SR-111 ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 101 82 2 112 143 16 6 3 1 2 0 5 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 456 Minor Approach Volume: 10 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 555 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.




Opening Year (PM)


2012 PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


20

0 Cycle Time (sec): 100

0

117

0


1 1!


0


97 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 4.8 0 1

LOS: B


Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 8:00-9:00AM Base Vol: 2 147 0 2 97 4 7 1 2 1 2 9 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 2 153 0 2 101 4 7 1 2 1 2 9 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 95 0 0 108 Initial Fut: 2 153 0 2 101 4 20 1 97 1 2 117 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 2 161 0 2 106 4 21 1 102 1 2 123 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 2 161 0 2 106 4 21 1 102 1 2 123 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 110 xxxx xxxxx 161 xxxx xxxxx 341 278 108 329 280 161 Potent Cap.: 1492 xxxx xxxxx 1431 xxxx xxxxx 617 633 951 628 632 889 Move Cap.: 1492 xxxx xxxxx 1431 xxxx xxxxx 529 631 951 558 630 889 Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.04 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.14 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 833 xxxxx xxxx 879 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxxx xxxxx 9.8 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * A * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.1 9.8 ApproachLOS: * * B A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Sinclair/SR-111 ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|



Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 2 153 0 2 101 4 20 1 97 1 2 117 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.1 9.8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.3] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=118] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=501] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.3] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=120] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=501] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Sinclair/SR-111 ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 2 153 0 2 101 4 20 1 97 1 2 117 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 262 Minor Approach Volume: 120 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 746 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.




Opening Year (PM)


2012 + P AM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


5

0


3 1!


0



LOS: C


Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 8:00-9:00AM Base Vol: 6 79 2 4 137 3 6 3 1 2 0 5 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 6 82 2 4 143 3 6 3 1 2 0 5 Added Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 95 0 0 108 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 101 82 2 114 143 16 6 3 1 2 0 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 109 89 2 123 154 17 7 3 1 2 0 6 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 109 89 2 123 154 17 7 3 1 2 0 6 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 172 xxxx xxxxx 91 xxxx xxxxx 721 720 163 721 727 90 Potent Cap.: 1418 xxxx xxxxx 1517 xxxx xxxxx 345 356 887 345 353 973 Move Cap.: 1418 xxxx xxxxx 1517 xxxx xxxxx 303 302 887 302 299 973 Volume/Cap: 0.08 xxxx xxxx 0.08 xxxx xxxx 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.3 xxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 324 xxxxx xxxx 595 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 16.5 xxxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.5 11.1 ApproachLOS: * * C B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Sinclair/SR-111 ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|







Opening Year (PM)


2012 + P PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


20


0

119

0


1 1!


0



LOS: B





Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 2 153 0 2 101 4 20 1 97 1 2 119 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.1 9.8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.3] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=118] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=503] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.3] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=122] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=503] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Sinclair/SR-111 ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 2 153 0 2 101 4 20 1 97 1 2 119 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 262 Minor Approach Volume: 122 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 746 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.




Opening Year (PM)


2012 AM

Intersection #2: Sinclair/Blair Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include Initial Vol: 0 7 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


3 1!


0



LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 4 5 1 Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Street Name: Blair Sinclair Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 7:45-8:45AM Base Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 10 1 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 118 1 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 PHF Volume: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 163 1 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 163 1 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 10 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 29 30 10 113 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1623 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 985 867 1077 869 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1623 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 982 864 1077 733 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.9 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1070 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * A * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.0 9.9 ApproachLOS: * * A A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Sinclair/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 118 1 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.0 9.9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.3] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=123] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=141] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=1] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=141] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Sinclair/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 118 1 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 18 Minor Approach Volume: 123 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1296 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.




Opening Year (PM)


2012 PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


1 1!


0



LOS: A


Street Name: Blair Sinclair Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00PM Base Vol: 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 4 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 112 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 PHF Volume: 168 3 2 2 5 0 2 2 5 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 168 3 2 2 5 0 2 2 5 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 5 xxxx xxxxx 5 xxxx xxxxx 348 349 5 351 348 4 Potent Cap.: 1630 xxxx xxxxx 1630 xxxx xxxxx 653 578 1084 607 579 1086 Move Cap.: 1630 xxxx xxxxx 1630 xxxx xxxxx 596 512 1084 550 513 1086 Volume/Cap: 0.10 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.3 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.5 xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 781 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * A * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.7 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Sinclair/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 112 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.7 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=5] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=125] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Sinclair/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 112 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 119 Minor Approach Volume: 5 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 786 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.




Opening Year (PM)


2012 + P AM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


3 1!


0



LOS: A





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 120 1 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.0 9.9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.3] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=125] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=143] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=1] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=143] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Sinclair/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 4 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 120 1 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 18 Minor Approach Volume: 125 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1296 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.




Opening Year (PM)


2012 + P PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


1 1!


0



LOS: A









Opening Year (PM)


2012 AM

Intersection #3: Peterson/Blair Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include Initial Vol: 0 19 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


0 1!


0



LOS: B


Street Name: Blair Peterson Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 7:15-8:15 AM Base Vol: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 221 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 221 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 PHF Volume: 0 321 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 321 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 348 348 27 348 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 611 579 1054 653 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 611 579 1054 653 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.5 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 221 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.5 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=1] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=240] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 221 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 239 Minor Approach Volume: 1 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 601 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.




Opening Year (PM)


2012 PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


0 1!


0



LOS: A


Street Name: Blair Peterson Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00PM Base Vol: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 9 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 9 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 PHF Volume: 0 14 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 14 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 249 249 235 249 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 709 657 809 744 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 709 657 809 744 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.9 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.9 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met







Opening Year (PM)


2012 + P AM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


0 1!


0



LOS: B


Street Name: Blair Peterson Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 7:15-8:15 AM Base Vol: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 221 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 221 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 PHF Volume: 0 321 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 321 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 351 351 30 351 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 608 577 1050 651 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 608 577 1050 651 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.5 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met







Opening Year (PM)


2012 + P PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


0 1!


0



LOS: A


Street Name: Blair Peterson Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00PM Base Vol: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 9 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 11 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 PHF Volume: 0 17 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 17 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 252 252 235 252 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 705 655 809 741 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 705 655 809 741 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.9 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.9 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met







Opening Year (PM)


2012 AM

Intersection #4: SR-115/Blair Signal=Stop/Rights=Include Initial Vol: 21 1 3 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Signal=Uncontrol


171


0

28

0


41 0


1



LOS: C

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 2 1 1 Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Street Name: Blair SR-115 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 7:30-8:30AM Base Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 2 1 1 3 1 21 171 41 1 2 24 28 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 0 Initial Fut: 2 1 1 3 1 21 171 41 1 2 119 28 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 PHF Volume: 3 1 1 4 1 28 233 55 1 3 162 38 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 1 1 4 1 28 233 55 1 3 162 38 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 725 729 56 711 710 182 201 xxxx xxxxx 57 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 343 352 1016 350 361 866 1383 xxxx xxxxx 1561 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 288 292 1016 303 300 866 1383 xxxx xxxxx 1561 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.17 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 0.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.3 8.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 352 xxxxx 302 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 15.4 xxxxx 17.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * C * C * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 15.4 10.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C B * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SR-115/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 21 171 41 1 2 119 28 ApproachDel: 15.4 10.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=4] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=390] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=25] FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=390] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SR-115/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 21 171 41 1 2 119 28 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 361 Minor Approach Volume: 25 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 812 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.




Opening Year (PM)


2012 PM


Signal=Uncontrol

Signal=Uncontrol


1


2

0


125 0


1



LOS: B


Street Name: Blair SR-115 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00PM Base Vol: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 1 1 23 4 146 7 30 2 0 52 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1 1 23 4 146 7 125 2 0 52 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 PHF Volume: 0 2 2 34 6 215 11 184 3 0 77 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 2 2 34 6 215 11 184 3 0 77 3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx 287 186 287 287 78 80 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx 626 861 669 626 988 1531 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx 622 861 663 622 988 1531 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.22 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.8 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.7 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx 722 656 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx 0.0 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx 10.0 10.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * B B * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 10.0 9.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B A * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SR-115/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 1 1 23 4 146 7 125 2 0 52 2 ApproachDel: 10.0 9.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=2] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=363] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.5] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=173] SUCCEED - Approach volume >= 150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=363] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SR-115/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 1 1 23 4 146 7 125 2 0 52 2 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 189 Minor Approach Volume: 173 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1091 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.




Cumulative (2030) AM


Cumulative AM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


7

0


4 1!


0


1 0


LOS: B











Cumulative PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


14

0


4 1!


0



LOS: B


Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 18 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00 PM Base Vol: 2 147 0 2 97 4 6 3 1 1 2 9 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 3 219 0 3 145 6 9 4 1 1 3 13 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Fut: 3 219 0 3 145 6 9 4 1 1 3 14 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 230 0 3 152 6 9 5 2 2 3 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 230 0 3 152 6 9 5 2 2 3 15 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 158 xxxx xxxxx 230 xxxx xxxxx 407 398 155 401 401 230 Potent Cap.: 1434 xxxx xxxxx 1349 xxxx xxxxx 558 543 896 563 541 814 Move Cap.: 1434 xxxx xxxxx 1349 xxxx xxxxx 543 540 896 557 538 814 Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.5 xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 565 xxxxx xxxx 728 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11.6 xxxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.6 10.1 ApproachLOS: * * B B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Sinclair/SR-111 ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









C+P AM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


7

0


4 1!


0



LOS: B











C+P PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


16

0


4 1!


0



LOS: B


Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 18 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00 PM Base Vol: 2 147 0 2 97 4 6 3 1 1 2 9 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 3 219 0 3 145 6 9 4 1 1 3 13 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Fut: 3 219 0 3 145 6 9 4 1 1 3 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 230 0 3 152 6 9 5 2 2 3 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 230 0 3 152 6 9 5 2 2 3 17 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 158 xxxx xxxxx 230 xxxx xxxxx 408 398 155 401 401 230 Potent Cap.: 1434 xxxx xxxxx 1349 xxxx xxxxx 557 543 896 563 541 814 Move Cap.: 1434 xxxx xxxxx 1349 xxxx xxxxx 541 540 896 557 538 814 Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.5 xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 563 xxxxx xxxx 736 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11.6 xxxxx xxxxx 10.0 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.6 10.0 ApproachLOS: * * B B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Sinclair/SR-111 ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|









Cumulative AM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


4 1!


0



LOS: A





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 16 1 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.7 8.9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=22] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=49] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=1] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=49] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Sinclair/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 16 1 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 25 Minor Approach Volume: 22 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1200 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.






Cumulative PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


1 1!


0



LOS: A











C+P AM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


4 1!


0



LOS: A





------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 18 1 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.7 8.9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=24] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=51] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=1] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=51] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Sinclair/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 6 7 1 0 10 0 1 4 18 1 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 25 Minor Approach Volume: 24 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1200 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.






C+P PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


1 1!


0



LOS: A











Cumulative AM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 0

0


0

0


0 1!


0



LOS: B


Street Name: Blair Peterson Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 0 316 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 316 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 PHF Volume: 0 459 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 459 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 498 498 39 498 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 486 477 1038 535 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 486 477 1038 535 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.8 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met









Cumulative PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


0 1!


0



LOS: B


Street Name: Blair Peterson Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00PM Base Vol: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 0 13 0 0 221 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 13 0 0 221 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 PHF Volume: 0 20 0 0 336 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 20 0 0 336 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 357 357 336 357 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 602 573 710 646 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 602 573 710 646 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.6 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met









C+P AM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop

Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 0

0


0

0


0 1!


0



LOS: B


Street Name: Blair Peterson Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 212 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 0 316 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 316 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 PHF Volume: 0 459 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 459 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 501 501 42 501 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 484 475 1035 533 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 484 475 1035 533 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.8 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met









C+P PM


Signal=Stop

Signal=Stop


0


0

0


0 1!


0



LOS: B


Street Name: Blair Peterson Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00PM Base Vol: 0 9 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 0 13 0 0 221 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 15 0 0 221 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 PHF Volume: 0 23 0 0 336 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 23 0 0 336 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 360 360 336 360 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 600 570 710 643 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 600 570 710 643 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.7 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.7 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Peterson/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met









Cumulative AM


Signal=Uncontrol

Signal=Uncontrol


247


0

40

0


62 0


1



LOS: C


Street Name: Blair SR-115 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 7:30-8:30AM Base Vol: 2 1 1 3 1 20 164 39 1 2 23 27 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 3 1 1 4 1 30 244 58 1 3 34 40 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 15 0 Initial Fut: 3 1 1 4 1 30 247 62 1 3 49 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 PHF Volume: 4 2 2 7 2 44 364 91 2 4 73 59 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 4 2 2 7 2 44 364 91 2 4 73 59 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 955 962 93 934 933 102 132 xxxx xxxxx 94 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 240 258 970 248 268 958 1466 xxxx xxxxx 1513 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 183 193 970 198 201 958 1466 xxxx xxxxx 1513 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.25 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 1.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.9 8.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 234 xxxxx 199 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 21.0 xxxxx 24.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * C * C * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 21.0 11.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C B * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SR-115/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 3 1 1 4 1 30 247 62 1 3 49 40 ApproachDel: 21.0 11.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=6] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=445] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=36] FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=445] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SR-115/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 3 1 1 4 1 30 247 62 1 3 49 40 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 403 Minor Approach Volume: 36 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 764 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.






Cumulative PM


Signal=Uncontrol

Signal=Uncontrol


10


0 3

0


58 0


1



LOS: B


Street Name: Blair SR-115 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 16 Mar 2010 << 4:00-5:00PM Base Vol: 0 1 1 22 4 140 7 29 2 0 50 2 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 0 1 1 33 6 209 10 43 3 0 75 3 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Related Pro: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 15 0 0 4 0 Initial Fut: 0 1 1 33 6 212 10 58 3 0 79 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 PHF Volume: 0 2 2 48 9 312 15 86 4 0 116 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 2 2 48 9 312 15 86 4 0 116 4 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx 239 88 239 239 118 120 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx 666 976 720 666 940 1480 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx 659 976 711 659 940 1480 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.33 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.5 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10.7 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B A * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx 787 702 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx 0.0 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx 9.6 10.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * A B * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 9.6 10.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A B * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SR-115/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met



------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 1 1 33 6 212 10 58 3 0 79 3 ApproachDel: 9.6 10.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=3] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=406] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=2][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.7] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=250] SUCCEED - Approach volume >= 150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=406] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SR-115/Blair ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 1 1 33 6 212 10 58 3 0 79 3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 153 Minor Approach Volume: 250 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1181 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.

Documents

Calipatria Solar Farm TIA - Granicus