10
JEADV ISSN 1468-3083 JEADV 2006, 20, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 493 Blackwell Publishing Ltd REVIEW ARTICLE Calciphylaxis – a topical overview G Arseculeratne,*† AT Evans‡, SM Morley† Department of Dermatology and Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK Keywords end-stage renal disease (ESRD), calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (CUA), calciphylaxis, secondary hyperparathyroidism, skin ulceration *Corresponding author, Department of Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK, tel. +1382 632294; fax. +1382 633916; E-mail: [email protected] Received: 28 October 2004, accepted 27 January 2005 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01506.x Abstract ‘Calciphylaxis’, a calcification syndrome associated with ischaemic cutaneous necrosis, is acquired naturally in humans in disease states. It is a life and limb- threatening complication, usually observed in patients with renal disease and secondary hyperparathyroidism, but known to occur in the absence of renal or parathyroid disease. The reported mortality rate, which ranges from 60 – 80%, relates to wound infection, sepsis and organ failure. It is a small-vessel vasculopathy, which is estimated to occur in about 4% of haemodialysis patients. Clinically, violaceous, reticulate areas of cutaneous necrosis and eschar may be evident, particularly in the extremities. In addition to the clinical picture, a raised calcium phosphorous product, an elevated parathyroid hormone level, radiographic evidence of vessel and soft-tissue calcification and the finding of mural calcification affecting small arteries and arterioles on histopathology help to confirm the diagnosis of this entity which generally has a poor prognosis. A high index of suspicion and an active multidisciplinary management approach, with rigorous attention to wound care and prevention of sepsis, are vital in the management of these patients. In this overview, we discuss the pathophysiology, clinical features and associations, risk factors, diagnosis and management issues relating to calciphylaxis. Pathophysiology Atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis and Mönckeberg’s sclerosis are vascular diseases associated with calcification and it is recognized that Mönckeberg’s sclerosis, which affects smaller elastic arteries, is a cardiovascular risk factor in patients with diabetes mellitus. 1,2 Arterial calcification is considered to be a strong independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and hyper- phosphataemia, as well as an increased calcium phosphorous product, are recognized as predictors of cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic renal disease. 3–5 Calciphylaxis is a relatively poorly understood syndrome which pre- dominantly affects small- and medium-sized blood vessels, and is a life-threatening entity usually seen in patients with renal disease, and may manifest as ischaemic cutaneous necrosis (Box 1). Calcification of cutaneous vasculature is known to be associated with chronic renal disease. 6 The association between cutaneous gangrene and vascular calcification was described by Bryandt and White in 1898. 7 Calciphylaxis was described by Hans Selye in 1962 following experimental observations in animal models. Selye utilized ‘sensitizing’ agents (parathyroid hormone, dihydrotachysterol) followed by ‘challenging’ agents such as metal salts, egg white or yolk and albumin to induce calcification. As the process was considered to be one of ‘induced hypersensitivity’, resulting in local calcification following the two-step process of sensitizing and challenging Box 1 Calciphylaxis A small and medium vessel vasculopathy First described by Hans Selye in 1962 Referred to as calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (CUA), when vascular calcification occurs Usually associated with chronic renal disease and secondary hyperparathyroidism Estimated to occur in about 4% of haemodialysis patients 10 Incidence of new cases, 1 case per 100 haemodialysis patients per year Known to occur in the absence of renal or parathyroid disease Mortality, ranging from 60–80%, relates to sepsis and organ failure May manifest as cutaneous necrosis

Calciphylaxis Review

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

research article

Citation preview

Page 1: Calciphylaxis Review

JEADV ISSN 1468-3083

JEADV

2006,

20

, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

493

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

REVIEW ARTICLE

Calciphylaxis – a topical overview

G Arseculeratne,*† AT Evans‡, SM Morley†

Department of Dermatology and

Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK

Keywords

end-stage renal disease (ESRD), calcific uraemic

arteriolopathy (CUA), calciphylaxis, secondary

hyperparathyroidism, skin ulceration

*

Corresponding author, Department of

Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical

School, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK,

tel.

+

1382 632294;

fax.

+

1382 633916;

E-mail: [email protected]

Received: 28 October 2004, accepted 27 January

2005

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01506.x

Abstract

‘Calciphylaxis’, a calcification syndrome associated with ischaemic cutaneousnecrosis, is acquired naturally in humans in disease states. It is a life and limb-threatening complication, usually observed in patients with renal disease andsecondary hyperparathyroidism, but known to occur in the absence of renalor parathyroid disease. The reported mortality rate, which ranges from 60–80%,relates to wound infection, sepsis and organ failure. It is a small-vesselvasculopathy, which is estimated to occur in about 4% of haemodialysispatients. Clinically, violaceous, reticulate areas of cutaneous necrosis andeschar may be evident, particularly in the extremities. In addition to the clinicalpicture, a raised calcium phosphorous product, an elevated parathyroidhormone level, radiographic evidence of vessel and soft-tissue calcification andthe finding of mural calcification affecting small arteries and arterioles onhistopathology help to confirm the diagnosis of this entity which generally hasa poor prognosis. A high index of suspicion and an active multidisciplinarymanagement approach, with rigorous attention to wound care and preventionof sepsis, are vital in the management of these patients. In this overview, wediscuss the pathophysiology, clinical features and associations, risk factors,diagnosis and management issues relating to calciphylaxis.

Pathophysiology

Atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis and Mönckeberg’ssclerosis are vascular diseases associated with calcificationand it is recognized that Mönckeberg’s sclerosis, whichaffects smaller elastic arteries, is a cardiovascular risk factorin patients with diabetes mellitus.

1,2

Arterial calcificationis considered to be a strong independent risk factor forcardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and hyper-phosphataemia, as well as an increased calcium phosphorousproduct, are recognized as predictors of cardiovascularrisk in patients with chronic renal disease.

3–5

Calciphylaxisis a relatively poorly understood syndrome which pre-dominantly affects small- and medium-sized blood vessels,and is a life-threatening entity usually seen in patientswith renal disease, and may manifest as ischaemiccutaneous necrosis (Box 1). Calcification of cutaneousvasculature is known to be associated with chronic renaldisease.

6

The association between cutaneous gangrene andvascular calcification was described by Bryandt and Whitein 1898.

7

Calciphylaxis was described by Hans Selye in 1962

following experimental observations in animal models.Selye utilized ‘sensitizing’ agents (parathyroid hormone,dihydrotachysterol) followed by ‘challenging’ agents suchas metal salts, egg white or yolk and albumin to inducecalcification. As the process was considered to be one of‘induced hypersensitivity’, resulting in local calcificationfollowing the two-step process of sensitizing and challenging

Box 1 Calciphylaxis

• A small and medium vessel vasculopathy

• First described by Hans Selye in 1962

• Referred to as calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (CUA), when vascular

calcification occurs

• Usually associated with chronic renal disease and secondary

hyperparathyroidism

• Estimated to occur in about 4% of haemodialysis patients10

• Incidence of new cases, 1 case per 100 haemodialysis patients per

year

• Known to occur in the absence of renal or parathyroid disease

• Mortality, ranging from 60–80%, relates to sepsis and organ failure

• May manifest as cutaneous necrosis

Page 2: Calciphylaxis Review

Calciphylaxis – a topical overview

Arseculeratne

et al.

494

JEADV

2006,

20

, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

(i.e. analogous to anaphylaxis), it was termed calciphylaxis.

8,9

It is known, however, that the clinical appearance and thehistolopathogical findings on which a diagnosis ofcalciphylaxis is made, differ between animal models andhumans. Experimental calcinosis is known to produceextravascular rather than arteriolar/arterial calcification,hence the term calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (CUA),proposed by Coates

et al

. when vascular calcificationoccurs.

11,12

Calciphylaxis as a syndrome was proposed byGipstein

et al

. in 1976 and Winklemann and Keatingdescribed vascular calcification and cutaneous necrosis,developing on a background of hyperparathyroidism result-ing from adenoma/carcinoma.

13,14

In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), increased dietary calcium,calcium-based phosphate binders, calcium absorptionfrom dialysate, abnormalities of bone buffering andturnover contribute to positive calcium balance.

15

Thewidespread use of oral phosphate binders to combaturaemic osteodystrophy has been implicated as a causativefactor in accelerating uraemic vasculopathy in the dialysispopulation.

16

Attention to mineral metabolism is vital in themanagement of patients with renal disease. The United StatesNational Kidney Foundation Clinical Practice Guidelinesrecommends that in stage 5 chronic kidney disease, theserum calcium, phosphate and the calcium phosphorousproduct should be maintained between 8.4 and 9.5 mg/dL, 3.5–5.5 mg/dL and less than 55 mg

2

/dL

2

, respectively.

17

Several proteins are known to play key roles in thepathogenesis of calcification. Studies on vascular diseaseincluding calciphylaxis in humans have revealed glycopro-teins such as matrix Gla protein (MGP) and osteopontin(OPN), in pathological arteries, and these findings supportthe view that they play a role in the development ofvascular fibrosis and calcification.

18

In animal models,OPN has been shown to play a nephro-protective role

invivo

as an inhibitor of calcium oxalate crystal formation inthe renal tubules.

19

Alpha 2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein/fetuin A (ahsg/fetuin) is a serum protein, produced by theliver in adults, which has been shown to play a preventativerole in the pathogenesis of calcification.

20

This protein isknown to act systemically to inhibit ectopic calcification,and fetuin-A knock-out mice are known to develop extra-skeletal calcification in the presence of hypercalcaemia,demonstrating that this protein plays a key role in theinhibition of calcification. Normalization of impairedinhibition of hydroxyapatite precipitation followingaddition of fetuin-A to the serum of dialysis patients hav-ing calciphylaxis has been demonstrated.

21

Core-bindingfactor alpha 1 (Cbfa 1), a transcription factor, is consideredto play a key role in activating stem cells into osteoblastsand Cbfa knock-out mice have been shown to be unableto produce mineralized bone.

22,23

It has also been demon-strated that, together with arterial mineralization, Cbfa

expression occurs in arteries from MGP knock-out miceand phosphorous has been shown to induce the expressionof Cbfa1 in vascular smooth muscle cells – Cbfa 1 is eviden-tially considered to play a key role in blood vessel calcifi-cation in the dialysis population.

24–26

Bone proteins areknown to be expressed in calcified arteries in patients withcalciphylaxis and there is evidence to suggest that mineral-forming micro-organisms (nanobacteria) can inducecalcium deposition in mammalian cell cultures and mayplay a role in human diseases characterized by extra-osseouscalcification.

27–29

Bone morphogenic protein-4 (BMP-4),which is physiologically involved in bone metabolism, isconsidered to play a role as a promoter of vascular medialcalcification.

30

Clinical features

Metastatic calcification is a well-recognized complicationobserved in patients with chronic renal disease and occursas a result of elevated calcium or phosphate levels resultingin calcium deposition in normal tissue. Relatively acutecutaneous necrosis is a recognised feature of calciphylaxis(Box 2). Early lesions may have a purpuric componentwhile violaceous reticulate skin lesions, painful induratedareas (‘peau de orange’), tender subcutaneous nodules,irregularly ulcerated areas and eschar formation beingevident subsequently (fig. 1). Violaceous, mottled, painfulcutaneous lesions should alert clinicians to the possibilityof calciphylaxis.

31

The initial presentation may appearsimilar to that of thrombophlebitis and calf pain is arecognized presenting symptom.

32,33

Patients may presentwith indurated plaques without ulceration, painful ulceratedplaques and livedoid bleeding in the lower limbs, leadingto sepsis and death in about 60% of such patients.

34,35

Extra-cutaneous calciphylaxis has been described involvingmuscle and rhabdomyolysis, resulting in leg pain andweakness, has been reported in calciphylaxis in theabsence of chronic renal failure.

36,37

Acute calcification ofmajor organs such as the heart and lungs may give rise tothe syndrome of ‘bony’ heart and lungs, the latter beinga cause of acute respiratory failure in these patients.

38,39

Intractable cardiac failure may follow renal transplantation

Box 2 Clinical features of calciphylaxis

• Purpuric/violaceous reticulate or mottled areas of cutaneous

discoloration

• Proximal or distal involvement

• Non-healing ulcers

• Painful cutaneous or subcutaneous necrosis/gangrene

• Eschar formation

• Clinical similarity to thrombophlebitis

• Calf pain and tenderness

• May be associated with calcification of internal organs

Page 3: Calciphylaxis Review

Arseculeratne

et al.

Calciphylaxis – a topical overview

JEADV

2006,

20

, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

495

as a result of cardiac calciphylaxis. Cardiac calciphylaxismay be localized and has been described in association withnanobacteria affecting the mitral valve.

40

Penile gangreneas well as Fournier’s gangrene are known complicationsof calciphylaxis and rarely, areas such as the tongue maybe affected by calciphylaxis.

41–43

Calcific cerebral embolismis a recognized cause of neurological symptomatology inpatients with renal disease.

44

The occurrence of the rashin meningococcal sepsis is considered to be associatedwith extravasation of calcium from the intravascularspace into the interstitium and therefore bears somesimilarity to the pathophysiology of calciphylaxis.

45

Differential diagnoses

Vasculitic syndromes, cholesterol embolization syndrome,cryoglobulinaemia, cryofibrinogenaemia, warfarin-inducedskin necrosis (WISN) and disseminated intravascularcoagulation (DIC) may present with cutaneous featuressimilar to that of calciphylaxis (Box 3).

46,47

Cowper

et al.

described scleromyxoedema-like cutaneous disease inhaemodialysis patients and nephrogenic fibrosingdermopathy (NFD) in renal transplant patients.

48

Boththese entities are associated with thickening of skin inpatients with renal disease and need to be considered inthe differential diagnosis. An increase in the number offibroblasts, as well as thickening of collagen fibres are seenin this rare fibrosing disorder of NFD, and its occurrencewith calciphylaxis, has been reported.

49

Scleromyxoedema,a rare entity which is characterized by papular mucinousdeposits, dermal fibroblast proliferation and monoclonalparaproteinaemia, also needs to be considered in thedifferential diagnosis of calciphylaxis.

50

Type 1 primaryoxaluria, a cause of cutaneous necrosis, needs to be con-sidered in the differential diagnosis.

51

Skin manifestationsof connective tissue diseases, such as livedoid erythema,may mimic some of the manifestations of calciphylaxis.

52

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, deep fungalinfections, panniculitides, pyoderma gangrenosum,

atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease, cellulitisand necrotizing fasciitis may all have clinical featuresresembling those of calciphylaxis and need exclusion.

53

Calciphylaxis has a wide differential diagnosis and therefore,in addition to the routine haematological and biochemicalparameters, investigations such as a vasculitis screen,estimation of cryoglobulins and cryofibrinogens, fibrindegradation products (FDPs), antiphospholipid antibodies,and Doppler assessment of limb vessels need to be considered.Involvement of subcutaneous arterioles in calciphylaxiscan be assessed by xeroradiography, a technique which isknown to demonstrate that the appearance of arteriolarcalcification differs from that of atherosclerosis.

54

Clinical associations

Calciphylaxis has been described in association withmetastatic malignancies, primary hyperparathyroidism(with normal renal function), end-stage liver disease/alcoholic liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis and long-termsteroid and methotrexate use and protein S deficiency inthe absence of renal disease.

55–60

Among other associationsare cholangiocarcinoma, malignant melanoma of softparts (clear-cell sarcoma) with calciphylactic changes inthe absence of renal or parathyroid disease, necrotizingmastopathy (caused by calciphylaxis) and long-standingCrohn’s disease.

61–64

Ultraviolet light treatment wasconsidered to have triggered calciphylaxis in a patientwho had renal disease secondary to systemic lupuserythematosus.

65

Calciphylaxis can be associated withwidespread visceral injury and a case with massive gastro-intestinal haemorrhage has been described.

66

Coexistenceof benign nodular calcification and calciphylaxis havebeen described in a haemodialysed patient.

67

Widespread

fig. 1 Calciphylaxis affecting right leg with ulceration and eschar formation.

Box 3 Differential diagnosis of calciphylaxis

• Vasculitic syndromes

• Cryoglobulinaemia (type 1)

• Cryofibrinogenaemia

• Cholesterol embolism syndrome

• Warfarin-induced skin necrosis (WISN)

• Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)

• Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD)

• Scleromyxedema

• Primary hyperoxaluria

• Connective tissue diseases

• Atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease

• Pyoderma gangrenosum

• Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

• Cellulitis

• Panniculitis

• Deep fungal infections

• Necrotizing fasciitis

Page 4: Calciphylaxis Review

Calciphylaxis – a topical overview

Arseculeratne

et al.

496

JEADV

2006,

20

, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

calciphylaxis has been described in patients with theacquired immunodeficiency syndrome in associationwith renal disease and has also been reported to occur inassociation with osteosclerotic myeloma.

68,69

Coexistentantiphospholipid antibody syndrome and calciphylaxis hasbeen documented and calciphylaxis has also been reportedin association with POEMS (Crowe–Fukase) syndrome, aplasma-cell lymphoproliferative disease.

70,71

A recent casereport documents calciphylaxis in a patient with chronicmyelomonocytic leukaemia.

72

Calciphylaxis needs to beconsidered in the differential diagnosis of renal failure inpatients with transplanted kidneys.

73

Risk/trigger factors

Risk/trigger factors for calciphylaxis include renal impair-ment, being a female, Caucasian race, obesity, warfarinuse, hypercoaguable states, diabetes mellitus, dialysisdependency, protein malnutrition and those receivingcalcium salts and vitamin D therapy (Box 4).

74–78

Albumininfusions as well as subcutaneous insulin injections havebeen considered as being precipitants of calciphylaxis.

79,80

In most series, patients with co-morbid conditionsgenerally have had a worse prognosis. It has beenestimated that the incidence of new cases of calciphylaxisis 1 case per 100 haemodialysis patients per year and amathematical formula {2

×

[CaP0(4) – 5]

×

alkalinephosphatase level (IU)

×

PTH ratio} has been suggested asbeing useful in identifying patients at risk of developingcalciphylaxis, this arithmetic model being based on aliterature review of calciphylaxis, clinical observationsand physiological principles.

81

Diagnosis and prognosis

The diagnosis of calciphylaxis is based on clinical,biochemical and histopathological features.

82

A highindex of suspicion needs to be maintained, particularly inpatients with renal impairment. An elevated PTH level,high calcium, an elevated phosphate level, an elevatedcalcium phosphorous product, elevated alkaline phos-phatase, a high urea and creatinine value and anaemiamay be noted. It is recognized, however, that calciphylaxiscan occur despite normal calcium and phosphate levels.Elevation of the enzyme alkaline phosphatase may reflectchronicity of the underlying renal disease and hyper-parathyroidism while anaemia may reflect underlyingrenal disease or poor nutrition as a result of chronicillness. A ‘pipe-stem’ pattern of vascular calcification maybe noted on conventional radiography and calcificationof subcutaneous arterioles may be noted on xeroradio-graphy. A recent case report documents increased traceraccumulation in subcutaneous tissue in a patient withESRD and calciphylaxis, who underwent a bone scanfor pain in the extremities.

83

Radiography may revealsubperiosteal bone resorption and enlargement of theparathyroid glands may be evident on echography. Vascularmural calcification has been noted to be an early andessential process in the development of calciphylaxisplaques.

84

Mural calcification occurs in small and mediumsized blood vessel walls (arteries and arterioles) andintimal proliferation may be noted (fig. 2a). Special stainsmay demonstrate calcium deposits and degeneration ofelastic fibres. Inflammation may be absent or minimal.Histological features of pseudoxanthoma elasticum havebeen observed in association with calciphylaxis.

85

Perineuralcalcification may occur in association with vascularcalcification in patients with calciphylaxis, and may becontributory to pain associated with the syndrome

86

(fig. 2b). Experimental neurotropic calcification has beendemonstrated in animal models.

87

Oxalate crystals maybe noted in tissue biopsies in cases of primary oxaluria,and in deep skin biopsies, calcifying septal panniculitismay be noted. An endovascular giant cell reaction may beobserved microscopically and early endovascular fibro-blastic activation has been found to be statisticallystrongly associated with the presence of giant cells.

88

Adeep incisional biopsy is likely to provide a betterhistological yield but in cases where a biopsy is inadvisableowing to sepsis or the potential to aggravate ulceration,the biochemical and endocrine profile may be sufficientto make the diagnosis and institute early managementstrategies. High-resolution high-frequency ultrasoundmay aid in the diagnosis of lesions, prior to the occurrenceof the typical skin lesions.

89

In a case series of five patients,extensive tissue involvement, previous renal transplant

Box 4 Calciphylaxis-recognized risk/trigger factors and precipitants

• High calcium-phosphate product

• Hypercalcaemia

• Hyperphosphataemia

• Hyperparathyroidism

• Females

• Caucasians

• Long-term obesity

• Corticosteroids

• Hypercoaguable states

• Low serum albumin

• Albumin infusions

• Iron-dextran injections

• Warfarin

• Vitamin D treatment

• Immunosuppression

• Trauma

• Diabetes mellitus

• Subcutaneous insulin injections

• Dialysis dependency

Page 5: Calciphylaxis Review

Arseculeratne

et al.

Calciphylaxis – a topical overview

JEADV

2006,

20

, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

497

and higher preoperative leucocyte counts (over 20 000cells/mL) were found to be factors related to early deathin patients with calciphylaxis.

90

In another case series ofsix patients with CUA, a relationship between distallocation of the lesions, normal serum albumin and earlydiagnosis were related to survival, rather than the typeof treatment patients received.

91

In a study of sevenpatients with calciphylaxis, lesion severity at time ofparathyroidectomy correlated with clinical outcome.

92

Management

Maintenance of a high index of suspicion, early recognitionand timely, appropriate intervention as well as an activemultidisciplinary approach are mandatory in com-bating the syndrome of calciphylaxis, which has a

poor prognosis (Box 5). Prevention of systemic infectionis vital. Diligent wound care, avoidance of trauma, andappropriate antibiotic usage together with nutritionalsupport and adequate pain control are important aspectsof general care of these patients. Neurolytic lumbarsympathetic blockade (LSB) has been proven to be a usefulmethod of alleviating pain associated with calciphylaxis.

93

In the initial stages when skin is eroded, gentle handlingis important and careful dressing of wounds with materialsuch as petrolatum-impregnated gauze help to minimizetissue damage. Debridement and skin grafting may bewarranted – however, the role of debridement is con-troversial and it has been suggested that debridement iscontraindicated for wounds covered with dry, non-infectedeschars.

94

Sterile maggot therapy and pentoxyfillin hasbeen used to treat ulcerated areas in calciphylaxis.

95

Transcutaneous oxygen tension (TCPO2) measurementhas been used as a rapid non-invasive screening for skinischaemia before the development of skin lesions.

96

Attention to calcium and phosphate levels are vital in themanagement of patients with this syndrome and referral toa dietician is an important facet of treatment. Increasedfrequency of haemodialysis too has been employed asa management strategy. Calcium- and aluminium-freephosphate binders such as sevelamer hydrochloride(RenaGel) have been found to be useful in the manage-ment of renal osteodystrophy particularly in patients withextraskeletal calcification and hypercalcaemia.

97

In astudy by Chertow

et al

. haemodialysis patients treatedwith sevelamer were found to be protected from increasedcalcification of the aorta and coronary arteries.

98

Cautionshould be exercised with the use of calcium-containingheparins as calcifying panniculitits has been reportedfollowing subcutaneous injections of nadroparin-calcium in a patient with osteomalacia.

99

Hyperbaricoxygen therapy has been used particularly in the absenceof severe secondary hyperparathyroidism where relativelyfew therapeutic options are available.

100,101

Attention toand regulation of divalent metabolism is required prior toconsidering revascularization procedures in patients withcalciphylaxis.

102

Parathyroidectomy is known to beassociated with resolution of pain, wound healing and alonger median survival in patients with calciphylaxis.

103–110

Total parathyroidectomy and auto-transplantation oftissue to the forearm has proven to be satisfactory in somecases, subtotal parathyroidectomy being an alternativesurgical approach.

111

Healing of lower extremity ulcers in22 patients with calciphylaxis has been reported following‘near total’ parathyroidectomy (where a vascularizedparathyroid remnant is left

in situ

); this procedure alsobeing noted to improve bone density in patients withhyperparathyroidism.

112

Recurrent hyperparathyroidismhas been reported and re-operation may be warranted in

fig. 2 (A) Histological appearance of circumferential mural calcification of

an arteriole affected by calciphylaxis (H&E preparation, magnification

×300). (B) histological appearance of perineural calcification in calciphy-

laxis (H&E preparation, magnification ×200).

Page 6: Calciphylaxis Review

Calciphylaxis – a topical overview

Arseculeratne

et al.

498

JEADV

2006,

20

, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

such cases.

113

Revascularization and amputation mayhave to be resorted to in cases where all other supportiveand conservative measures have failed. Steroid use hasbeen associated with calciphylaxis, but treatment of apatient with renal failure with oral prednisolone followedby cimetidine has been reported to have reversed changesof calcifying panniculitis.

114

Sodium thiosulphate, anantidote for cyanide poisoning, is recognized to be apotent antioxidant as well as a chelator of calcium.

115

Intravenous sodium thiosulphate may have an adjunctiverole in therapy – it has been documented to reverse thesigns and symptoms of calciphylaxis.

116,117

Rapid resolutionof calciphylaxis has been reported following intravenoussodium thiosulphate and continuous veno-venoushaemofiltration.

118

In experimental animal models, theamino bisphosphonate ibandronate has been found toinhibit arterial calcification at doses that inhibit boneresorption, and improvement of calciphylaxis has beenreported after the intravenous use of pamidronate in apatient with chronic renal failure.

119,120

Intravenous maxa-calcitol, a vitamin D (3) formulation, used in conjunctionwith percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) hasbeen documented to lead to a reduction in PTH secretion,regression of parathyroid hyperplasia and control of thecalcium-phosphorous product in dialysis patients – thiscombination is also considered to have a preventative rolein vascular calcification in the dialysis population.

121

Conclusions

Calciphylaxis is potentially lethal syndrome seen usuallyin patients with end-stage renal disease and secondaryhyperparathyroidism. It may, however, be associated with

other disease entities in the absence of renal or parathyroiddisease. A high index of suspicion, early intervention, and anactive multidisciplinary medical and surgical approach arevital aspects of the management strategy. Discovery of serumproteins, which play key regulatory roles in calciumhomeostasis, is likely to lead to novel therapeutic conceptswhich will broaden the therapeutic armamentarium avail-able to clinicians who manage patients with calciphylaxis.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Computing and Media ServicesDepartment, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School,Dundee, Scotland, for providing the illustrations.

References

1 Lehto S, Niskanen L, Suhonen M

et al.

Medial artery

calcification. A neglected harbinger of cardiovascular

complications in non-insulin-dependant diabetes mellitus.

Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol

1996;

16

: 978–983.

2 Niskanen L, Siitonen O, Suhonen M

et al.

Medial artery

calcification predicts cardiovascular mortality in patients

with NIDDM.

Diabetes Care

1994;

17

: 1252–1256.

3 Block GA. Control of serum phosphorous: implications

for coronary artery calcification and calcific uremic

arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis).

Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens

2001; 10: 741–747.

4 Block GA. Prevalence and clinical consequences of

elevated Ca X P product in hemodialysis patients. Clin

Nephrol 2000; 54: 318–324.

5 Cannata-Andia JB, Rodriguez-Garcia B.

Hyperphosphataemia as a cardiovascular risk factor-how

Principles

• Maintenance of a high index of suspicion

• Early intervention

• An active, multidisciplinary approach

Prevention/Treatment Options

• Use of calcium-free/aluminium-free phosphate binders (e.g. sevelamer hydrochloride)

• Institution of a low-phosphate diet

• Increased frequency of haemodialysis

• Correction of anaemia

• Use of less calcaemic vitamin D analogues

• Wound care debridement/skin grafting

• Use of appropriate antibiotics

• Adequate pain control

• Parathyroidectomy (total, subtotal, near-total)

• Hyberbaric oxygen therapy

• Intravenous bisphosphonates

• Intravenous sodium thiosulphate

• Continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and intravenous sodium thiosulphate

• Intravenous maxacalcitol and percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) (a preventative role)

Box 5 Management of calciphylaxis

Page 7: Calciphylaxis Review

Arseculeratne et al. Calciphylaxis – a topical overview

JEADV 2006, 20, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 499

to manage the problem. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17

(Suppl. 11): 16–19.

6 Kossard S, Winklemann RK. Vascular calcification in

dermatopathology. Am J Dermatopathol 1979; 1: 27–34.

7 Bryant JH, White WH. A case of calcification of the arteries

and obliterative endarteritis associated with

hydronephrosis in a child aged six months. Guys Hosp Rep

1899; 55: 17–28.

8 Selye H. Calciphylaxis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago,

IL, 1962.

9 Selye H. The dermatologic implications of stress and

calciphylaxis. J Invest Dermatol 1962; 39: 259–275.

10 Angelis M, Wong LL, Myers SA, Wong LM. Calciphylaxis in

patients on hemodialysis: a prevalence study. Surgery 1997;

122: 1083–1090.

11 Chan YL, Mahony JF, Turner JJ et al. The vascular lesions

associated with skin necrosis in renal disease. Br J Dermatol

1983; 109: 85–95.

12 Coates T, Kirkland GS, Dymock RB et al. Cutaneous

necrosis from calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Am J Kidney

Dis 1998; 32: 384–391.

13 Gipstein RM, Coburn JW, Adams DA et al. Calciphylaxis

in man. Arch Intern Med 1976; 136: 1273–1280.

14 Winklemann RK, Keating FR. Cutaneous vascular

calcification, gangrene and hyperparathyroidism.

Br J Dermatol 1970; 83: 263–268.

15 Valek M, Sulkova S, Schestauberova E et al. The

calciphylaxis syndrome as a complication of chronic kidney

failure. 6 case reports and literature review. Cas Lek Cesk

2002; 141: 355–358.

16 Goldsmith D, Ritz E, Covic A. Vascular calcification: a stiff

challenge for the nephrologist: does preventing bone disease

cause arterial disease? Kidney Int 2004; 66: 1315–1333.

17 Al Aly Z, Gonzalez EA, Martin KJ, Gelens ME. Achieving

target values for bone and mineral metabolism: an uphill

battle. Am J Nephrol 2004; 24: 422–426.

18 Canfield AE, Farrington C, Dziobon MD et al. The

involvement of matrix glycoproteins in vascular

calcification and fibrosis: an immunohistochemical study.

J Pathol 2002; 196: 228–234.

19 Wesson JA, Johnson RJ, Mazzali M et al. Osteopontin is

critical inhibitor of calcium crystal formation and retention

in renal tubules. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 139–147.

20 Jahnen-Dechent W, Schafer C, Heiss A et al. Systemic

inhibition of spontaneous calcification by the serum

protein alpha 2-HS glycoprotein/fetuin. Z Kardiol 2001; 90

(Suppl. 3): 47–56.

21 Schafer C, Heiss A, Schwartz A et al. The serum protein

alpha 2-Heremans Schmid glycoprotein/fetuin-A is a

systemically acting inhibitor of ectopic calcification. J Clin

Invest 2003; 112: 357–366.

22 Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S et al. Targeted disruption of

Cbfa 1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing

to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 1997; 89: 755–

764.

23 Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V et al. Osf2/Cbfa 1: a

transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation.

Cell 1997; 89: 747–754.

24 Steitz SA, Speer MY, Curinga G et al. Smooth muscle

cell phenotypic transition associated with calcification:

upregulation of Cbfa 1 and downregulation of smooth

muscle lineage markers. Circ Res 2001; 89: 1147–1154.

25 Jono S, McKee MD, Murry CE et al. Phosphate regulation

of vascular smooth muscle cell calcification. Circ Res 2000;

87: E10–E17.

26 Giachelli CM. Vascular calcification: evidence for the role of

inorganic phosphate. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14 (9 Suppl.

4): S300–S304.

27 Moe SM, O’Neill KD, Duan D et al. Medial artery

calcification in ESRD patients is associated with deposition

of bone matrix proteins. Kidney Int 2002; 61: 638–647.

28 Kajander EO, Ciftcioglu N. Nanobacteria: an alternative

mechanism for pathogenic intra- and extracellular

calcification and stone formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

1998; 95: 8274–8279.

29 Carson DA. An infectious origin of extraskeletal

calcification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:

7846–7847.

30 Griethe W, Schmitt R, Jurgensen JS et al. Bone

morphogenic protein-4 expression in vascular lesions

of calciphylaxis. J Nephrol 2003; 16: 728–732.

31 Payasli C, Hosnuter M, Babuccu O et al. Spotting the signs:

a case of late diagnosed painful calciphylaxis. J Wound Care

2005; 14: 12–13.

32 Lang N, Davie R, Whitworth C et al. Fatal calcific uraemic

atreriolopathy (CUA): a case report and review of the

literature. Scott Med J 2004; 49: 108–111.

33 Fine A, Fleming S, Leslie W. Calciphylaxis presenting with

calf pain and plaques in four continuous ambulatory

peritoneal dialysis patients and in one pre-dialysis patient.

Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 25: 498–502.

34 Nahm WK, Badiavas E, Touma DJ et al. Calciphylaxis with

peau d’orange induration and absence of classical features

of purpura, livedo reticularis and ulcers. J Dermatol 2002;

29: 209–213.

35 Somorin AO, Al Harbi A, Subaity Y et al. Calciphylaxis: case

report and literature review. Afr J Med Sci 2002; 31: 175–

178.

36 Edelstein CC, Wickham MK, Kirby PA. Systemic

calciphylaxis presenting as a painful proximal myopathy.

Postgrad Med J 1992; 68: 209–211.

37 Randall DP, Fisher MA, Thomas C. Rhabdomyolysis as

the presenting manifestation of calciphylaxis. Muscle Nerve

2000; 23: 289–293.

38 Kloeppel R, Luebke P, Mittag M et al. Acute hypercalcaemia

of the heart (‘bony heart’). J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25:

407–411.

39 Matsuo T, Tsukamoto Y, Tamura M. Acute respiratory

failure due to ‘pulmonary calciphylaxis’ in a maintenance

haemodialysis patient. Nephron 2001; 87: 75–79.

Page 8: Calciphylaxis Review

Calciphylaxis – a topical overview Arseculeratne et al.

500 JEADV 2006, 20, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

40 Jelic TM, Malas AM, Groves SS et al. Nanobacteria-caused

mitral valve calciphylaxis in a man with diabetic renal

failure. South Med J 2004; 97: 194–198.

41 Jacobsohn HA, Jenkins PG, Jacobsohn KM. Penile

calciphylaxis. Urology 2002; 60: 344.

42 So A, Bell D, Metcalf P et al. Calciphylaxis of the penis:

a unique cause of Fournier’s gangrene. Can J Urol 2001; 8:

1377–1379.

43 Bedoya RM, Gutierrez JL, Mayorga F. Calciphylaxis

causing localised tongue necrosis: a case report. J Oral

Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 193–196.

44 Katsamakis G, Lukovits TG, Gorelick PB. Calcific cerebral

embolism in systemic calciphylaxis. Neurology 1998; 51:

295–297.

45 Holland PC, Thompson D, Hancock S et al. Calciphylaxis,

proteases and purpura: an alternative hypothesis for the

severe shock, rash and hypocalcaemia associated with

meningococcal septicaemia. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 2757–

2761.

46 Mathur RV, Shortland JR, el-Nahas AM. Calciphylaxis.

Postgrad Med J 2001; 77: 557–561.

47 Sankarasubbaiyan S, Scott G, Holley JL.

Cryofibrogenaemia: an addition to the differential

diagnosis of calciphylaxis in end-stage renal failure. Am J

Kidney Dis 1998; 32: 494–498.

48 Cowper SE, Robin HS, Steinberg SM et al.

Scleromyxedema-like cutaneous disease in renal-dialysis

patients. Lancet 2000; 356: 1000–1001.

49 Edsall LC, English JC 3rd, Patterson JW. Calciphylaxis

and metastatic calcification associated with nephrogenic

fibrosing dermopathy. J Cutan Pathol 2004; 31: 247–253.

50 Pomman JJ, Rudner EJ. Scleromyxedema revisited.

Int J Dermatol 2003; 42: 31–35.

51 Somach SC, Davis BR, Paras FA et al. Fatal cutaneous

necrosis mimicking calciphylaxis in a patient with type 1

primary hyperoxaluria. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 821–823.

52 Lue C, Boulware DW, Sanders PW. Calciphylaxis

mimicking skin lesions of connective tissue diseases. South

Med J 1996; 89: 1099–1000.

53 Oh DH, Eulau D, Tokugawa DA et al. Five cases of

calciphylaxis and a review of the literature. (Clinical

review). J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40 (6 pt1): 979–987.

54 Lazorik FC, Friedman AK, Leyden JJ. Xeroradiographic

observations in four patients with chronic renal disease

and cutaneous gangrene. Arch Dermatol 1981; 117:

325–328.

55 Mastruserio DN, Nguyen EQ, Neilsen T et al. Calciphylaxis

associated with metastatic breast carcinoma. J Am Acad

Dermatol 1999; 41 (2 pt 2): 295–298.

56 Pollock B, Cunliffe WJ, Merchant WJ. Calciphylaxis in the

absence of renal failure. Clin Exp Dermatol 2000; 25: 389–

392.

57 Lim SP, Batta K, Tan BB. Calciphylaxis in a patient with

alcoholic liver disease in the absence of renal failure.

Clin Exp Dermatol 2003; 28: 34–36.

58 Goli AK, Goli SA, Shah LS et al. Calciphylaxis: a rare

association with alcoholic cirrhosis. Are deficiencies in

protein C and S the cause? South Med J 2005; 98: 736–739.

59 Korkmaz C, Dunbar E, Zubaroglu I. Calciphylaxis in a

patient with rheumatoid arthritis without renal failure and

hyperparathyroidism: the possible role of long-term steroid

use and protein S deficiency. Clin Rheumatol 2002; 21: 66–

69.

60 Ozbalkan Z, Calguneri M, Onat AM. Development of

calciphylaxis after long-term steroid and methotrexate use

in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Intern Med 2005; 44:

1178–1181.

61 Reigert-Johnson DL, Kaur JS, Pfiefer EA. Calciphylaxis

associated with cholangiocarcinoma treated with

low-molecular heparin and vitamin K. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;

76: 749–752.

62 Kutlu NO, Aydin NE, Aslan M et al. Malignant melanoma

of the soft parts showing calciphylaxis. Pediatr Hematol

Oncol 2003; 20: 141–146.

63 Patetsios P, Bernstein M, Kim S et al. Severe

necrotizing mastopathy caused by calciphylaxis

alleviated by total parathyroidectomy. Am Surg 2000; 66:

1056–1058.

64 Barri YM, Graves GS, Knochel JP. Calciphylaxis in a patient

with Crohn’s disease in the absence of end-stage renal

disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 29: 773–776.

65 James LR, Lajoie G, Prajapati D et al. Calciphylaxis

precipitated by ultraviolet light in a patient with end-stage

renal disease secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus.

Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 34: 932–936.

66 Brown DF, Denney CF, Burns DK. Systemic calciphylaxis

associated with massive gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998; 122: 656–659.

67 Strumia R, Lombardi AR, Bedani PI et al. Benign nodular

calcification and calciphylaxis in a haemodialysed patient.

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1998; 11: 69–71.

68 Cockerell CJ, Dolan ET. Widespread cutaneous and

systemic calcification (calciphylaxis) in patients with the

acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and renal disease. J

Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 26: 559–562.

69 Raper RF, Ibels LS. Osteosclerotic myeloma complicated

by diffuse arteritis, vascular calcification and extensive

cutaneous necrosis. Nephron 1985; 39: 389–392.

70 Wong JJ, Laumann A, Martinez M et al. Calciphylaxis and

antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (Letter). J Am Acad

Dermatol 2000; 42 (5 pt 1): 849.

71 De Roma I, Filotico R, Cea M et al. Calciphylaxis in a patient

with POEMS syndrome without renal failure and/or

hyperparathyroidism. A case report. Ann Ital Med Int 2004;

19: 283–287.

72 Goff HW, Grimwood RE. A case of calciphylaxis and

chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. Cutis 2005; 75:

325–328.

73 Brewster UC, Perazella MA. Calcific uremic arteriolopathy

in a transplanted kidney. Am J Med Sci 2005; 329: 102–103.

Page 9: Calciphylaxis Review

Arseculeratne et al. Calciphylaxis – a topical overview

JEADV 2006, 20, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 501

74 Wilmer WA, Magro CM. Calciphylaxis; emerging concepts

in prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Semin Dial 2002;

15: 172–186.

75 Mazhar AR, Johnson RJ, Gillen D et al. Risk factors and

mortality associated with calciphylaxis in end-stage renal

disease. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 2210–2217.

76 Fine A, Zacharias J. Calciphylaxis is usually non-ulcerating:

risk factors, outcome and therapy. Kidney Int 2002; 61:

2210–2217.

77 Bleyer AJ, Choi M, Igwemezie B et al. A case control study

of proximal calciphylaxis (Comment in). Am J Kidney Dis

1998; 32: 376–383.

78 Dahl PR, Winklemann RK, Connolly SM. The vascular

calcification-cutaneous necrosis syndrome. J Am Acad

Dermatol 1995; 33: 53–58.

79 Richens G, Piepkorn MW, Kreuger GS. Calcifying

panniculitis associated with renal failure: a case of Selyes’

calciphylaxis in man. J Am Acad Dermatol 1982; 6 (4 Part 1):

537–539.

80 Ruggian JC, Maesaka JA, Fishbane S. Proximal

calciphylaxis in four insulin-requiring diabetic

haemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1996; 28:

409–414.

81 Levin A, Mehta RL, Goldstein MB. Mathematical

formulation to help identify the patient at risk of ischaemic

tissue necrosis – a potentially lethal complication of chronic

renal failure. Am J Nephrol 1993; 13: 448–453.

82 Howe SC, Murray JD, Reeves RT et al. Calciphylaxis,

a poorly understood clinical syndrome: three case reports

and a review of the literature. Ann Vasc Surg 2001; 15: 470–

473.

83 Norris B, Vaysman V, Line BR. Bone scintigraphy of

calciphylaxis: a syndrome of vascular calcification and

skin necrosis. Clin Nucl Med 2005; 30: 725–727.

84 Au S, Crawford RI. Three-dimensional analysis of

a calciphylaxis plaque: clues to pathogenesis. J Am Acad

Dermatol 2002; 47: 53–57.

85 Nikko AP, Dunnigan M, Cockerell CJ. Calciphylaxis with

changes of pseudoxanthoma elasticum. Am J Dermatopathol

1996; 18: 396–399.

86 Ruiz-Geugo D, Garcia-F-Villalta M, Fraga J et al. Perineural

and vascular calcification in a patient with chronic renal

failure. Acta Derm Venereol 2005; 85: 72–73.

87 Robinson MJ, Strebel RF, Wagner BM. Experimental tissue

calcification. IV. Ultrasrtuctural observations in vagal

calciphylaxis. Arch Path 1968; 85: 503–515.

88 Fischer AH, Morris DJ. Pathogenesis of calciphylaxis: study

of three cases with literature review. Hum Pathol 1995; 26:

1055–1064.

89 Tiefenthaler M, Riedl-Huter C, Roth T et al. Ultrasonic

diagnosis of calciphylactic lesions. Ultraschall Med 2002; 23:

403–406.

90 Kriskovich MD, Holman JM, Haller JR. Calciphylaxis: is

there a role for parathyroidectomy? Laryngoscope 2000;

110: 603–607.

91 Galimberti RL, Farias Edos R, Parra IH et al. Cutaneous

necrosis by calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Int J Dermatol

2005; 44: 101–106.

92 Roe SM, Graham LD, Brock MB, Barker DE. Calciphylaxis:

early recognition and management. Am Surg 1994; 60: 81–

86.

93 Green JA, Green CR, Minott SD. Calciphylaxis treated

with neuroplytic lumbar sympathetic block: case report

and review of the literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25:

310–312.

94 Martin R. Mysterious calciphylaxis: wounds with eschar

– to debride or not to debride. Ostomy Wound Manage 2004;

50: 64–66.

95 Tittelbach J, Graefe T, Wollina U. Painful ulcers in

calciphylaxis – combined therapy with maggot therapy and

oral pentoxyfillin. J Dermatolog Treat 2001; 12: 211–214.

96 Wilmer WA, Voroshilova O, Singh I et al. Transcutaneous

oxygen tension in patients with calciphylaxis. Am J Kidney

Dis 2001; 37: 797–806.

97 Bardin T. Musculoskeletal manifestations of chronic renal

failure. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2003; 15: 48–54.

98 Chertow GM, Burke SK, Raggi P. Sevelamer attenuates the

progression of coronary aortic calcification in hemodialysis

patients. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 245–252.

99 Campanelli A, Kaya G, Masouye I et al. Calcifying

panniculitis following subcutaneous injections of

nadroparin-calcium in a patient with osteomalacia.

Br J Dermatol 2005; 153: 657–660.

100 Basile C, Montanaro A, Masi M et al. Hyperbaric oxygen

therapy for calcific uremic arteriolopathy – a case series.

J Nephrol 2002; 15: 676–680.

101 Podymow T, Wherrett TC, Burns KD. Hyperbaric oxygen

in the treatment of calciphylaxis: a case series. Nephrol Dial

Transplant 2001; 16: 2176–2180.

102 Mureebe L, Moy B, Balfour E et al. Calciphylaxis: a poor

prognostic indicator for limb salvage. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33:

1275–1279.

103 Girotto JA, Harmon JW, Ratner LE et al.

Parathyroidectomy promotes wound healing and prolongs

survival in patients with calciphylaxis from secondary

hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 2001; 130: 645–650.

104 Hafner J, Keusch G, Wahl C et al. Uraemic small-artery

disease with medial calcification and intimal hyperplasia

(so-called calciphylaxis): a complication of chronic renal

failure and benefit from parathyroidectomy. J Am Acad

Dermatol 1995; 33: 954–962.

105 Garrigue V, Lorho R, Canet S et al. Necrotic skin lesions in

a dialysis patient: a multifactorial entity. Clin Nephrol 2002;

57: 163–166.

106 Torok L, Kozepessy L. Cutaneous gangrene due to

hyperparathyroidism secondary to chronic renal failure

(uraemic gangrene syndrome). Clin Exp Dermatol 1996; 21:

75–77.

107 Milas M, Bush RL, Lin P et al. Calciphylaxis and

non-healing wounds: the role of the vascular surgeon in

Page 10: Calciphylaxis Review

Calciphylaxis – a topical overview Arseculeratne et al.

502 JEADV 2006, 20, 493–502 © 2006 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

a multidisciplinary treatment. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37:

501–507.

108 Younis N, Sells RA, Desmond A et al. Painful cutaneous

lesions, renal failure and urgent parathyroidectomy.

J Nephrol 2002; 15: 324–329.

109 Duh QY, Lim RC, Clark OH. Calciphylaxis in secondary

hyperparathyroidism. Diagnosis and parathyroidectomy.

Arch Surg 1991; 126: 1213–1218.

110 Duffy A, Schurr M, Warner T et al. Long-term outcomes in

patients with calciphylaxis from hyperparathyroidism. Ann

Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 96–102.

111 Kang AS, McCarthy JT, Rowland C et al. Is calciphylaxis

best treated surgically or medically? Surgery 2000; 128:

967–971.

112 Milas M, Weber CJ. Near-total parathyroidectomy is

beneficial for patients with secondary and tertiary

hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 2004; 136: 1252–1260.

113 Kane WJ, Petty PM, Sterioff S et al. The uraemic gangrene

syndrome: improved healing in spontaneously forming

wounds following subtotal parathyroidectomy. Plast

Reconstr Surg 1996; 98: 671–678.

114 Elamin EM, McDonald AB. Calcifying panniculitis with

renal failure: a new management approach. Dermatology

1996; 192: 156–159.

115 Cicone JS, Petronis JB, Embert CD et al. Successful

treatment of calciphylaxis with intravenous sodium

thiosulphate. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: 1104–1108.

116 Brucculeri M, Cheigh J, Bauer G et al. Long-term

intravenous sodium thiosulphate in the treatment

of a patient with calciphylaxis. Semin Dial 2005; 18:

431–434.

117 Hayden MR, Tyagi SC, Kolb L et al. Vascular

ossification–calcification in metabolic syndrome, type 2

diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and

calciphylaxis–calcific uremic arteriolopathy: the

emerging role of sodium thiosulfate. Cardiovasc Diabetol

2005; 4: 4.

118 Guerra G, Shah RC, Ross EA. Rapid resolution of

calciphylaxis with intravenous sodium thiosulphate and

continuous veno-venous haemofiltration using low

calcium replacement fluid: case report. Nephrol Dial

Transplant 2005; 20: 1260–1262.

119 Price PA, Omid N, Than TN et al. The amino

bisphosphonate Ibandronate prevents calciphylaxis in the

rat at doses that inhibit bone resorption. Calcif Tissue Int

2002; 71: 356–363.

120 Monney P, Nguyen QV, Perroud H et al. Rapid

improvement of calciphylaxis after intravenous

pamidronate therapy in a patient with chronic renal

failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 2130–2132.

121 Tanaka M, Itoh K, Matsushita K et al. Combination therapy

of intravenous maxacalcitol and percutaneous ethanol

injection therapy lowers serum parathyroid hormone

level and calcium X phosphorous product in secondary

hyperparathyroidism. Nephrol Clin Pract 2005; 102: cl–c7.

E-pub 2005 Sept 13.