Please be advised that the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) & TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) will be meeting on:

DATE: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 TIME: 1:30 P.M. (CAC) & 3:00 P.M. (TCC) PLACE: River to Sea TPO Conference Room

2570 W. International Speedway Blvd., Suite 100 Daytona Beach, Florida 32114

****************************************************************************************** Ms. Judy Craig, CAC Chairperson Mr. Tim Burman, TCC Chairman

CAC & TCC AGENDA

I. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL / DETERMINATION OF QUORUM

II. PUBLIC COMMENT/PARTICIPATION (Public comments may be limited to three (3) minutes at the discretion ofthe Chairperson)

III. CONSENT AGENDA

A. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF APRIL 18, 2017 CAC/TCC MEETING MINUTES (Contact: Debbie Stewart) (Enclosure, CAC: pages 3-14; TCC: pages 15-24)

IV. ACTION ITEMS

A. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT & COMPLAINT PROCEDURES (Contact: Pamela Blankenship) (Enclosure, pages 25-36)

B. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP) ACCESS PLAN (Contact: Pamela Blankenship) (Enclosure, pages 37-45)

C. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## AMENDING THE FY 2016/17 TO 2020/21 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) (Contact: Robert Keeth) (Enclosure, pages 46-51)

D. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## SUPPORTING UPDATES TO THE FLORIDA GREENWAYS AND TRAIL SYSTEM (FGTS) PLAN AND THE OPPORTUNITY AND PRIORITY MAPS (Contact: Stephan Harris) (Enclosure, pages 52-56)

1

V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS

A. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE TPO’S DRAFT PRIORITY PROJECT LISTS (Contact: Robert Keeth and Stephan Harris) (Enclosure, pages 57-91)

B. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT FY 2017/18-2021/22 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) (Contact: Robert Keeth) (Enclosure, page 92)

C. PRESENTATION AND UPDATE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PLAN SCOPE OF SERVICES (Contact: Vince Wang) (Enclosure, pages 93-98)

D. FDOT REPORT (Contact: Gene Ferguson, FDOT District 5) (Enclosure, pages 99-108)

E. VOLUSIA COUNTY AND FLAGLER COUNTY CONSTRUCTION REPORTS (Contact: Volusia & Flagler County Traffic Engineering) (Enclosure, pages 109-111)

VI. STAFF COMMENTS (Enclosure, page 112)

® Update on SunRail

® Update on the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study

VII. CAC/TCC MEMBER COMMENTS (Enclosure, page 112)

VIII. INFORMATION ITEMS (Enclosure, pages 112-117)

® April 26, 2017 River to Sea TPO Board Meeting Summary® April TPO Outreach and Events® National Trails Day Flyer

IX. ADJOURNMENT (Enclosure, page 112)

**The next CAC and TCC meetings will be on Tuesday, June 20, 2017**

Note: Individuals covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 in need of accommodations for this public meeting should contact the River to Sea TPO office, 2570 W. International Speedway Blvd., Suite 100, Daytona Beach, Florida 32114-8145; (386) 226-0422, extension 20425, at least five (5) working days prior to the meeting date.

Note: If any person decides to appeal a decision made by this board with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he/she will need a record of the proceedings including all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. To that end, such person will want to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made.

Note: The River to Sea TPO does not discriminate in any of its programs or services. To learn more about our commitment to nondiscrimination and diversity, visit our Title VI page at www.r2ctpo.org or contact our Title VI/Nondiscrimination Coordinator, Pamela Blankenship, at 386-226-0422, extension 20416, or pblankenship@r2ctpo.org. Persons who require translation services, which are provided at no cost, should contact the River to Sea TPO at (386) 226-0422 or by email at PBlankenship@r2ctpo.org at least five (5) business days prior to the event.

2

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

III. CONSENT AGENDA A. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 18, 2017 CAC/TCC MEETING MINUTES Background Information: Minutes are prepared for each CAC and TCC meeting and said minutes must be approved by their respective committees. ACTION REQUESTED: MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA

3

Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting Minutes

April 18, 2017

CAC Members Present: Representing: Donald Smart Daytona Beach Ralph Bove DeBary Bliss Jamison Edgewater Greg Feldman, Vice Chairman Flagler County Gilles Blais Holly Hill Nora Jane Gillespie New Smyrna Beach Alan Peterson Palm Coast Bobby Ball Port Orange Bob Storke Orange City Dan D’Antonio Volusia County Chair Judy Craig, Chairperson Volusia County Patricia Lipovsky Volusia County Elizabeth Alicia Lendian Volusia County Terry Bledsoe Volusia County Edie Biro Votran (CTC) Melissa Winsett (non-voting) Volusia County Traffic Engineering Gene Ferguson (non-voting advisor) FDOT District 5 Bob Owens (non-voting) Flagler County Adam Mengel (non-voting) Flagler County Traffic Engineering CAC Members Absent: Representing: Janet Deyette (excused) Deltona Bob Owens (excused) Flagler County Transit Susan Elliott (excused) Pierson Joe Villanella (excused) Ponce Inlet Jack Delaney South Daytona Others Present: Representing: Debbie Stewart, Recording Secretary TPO Staff Pamela Blankenship TPO Staff Lois Bollenback TPO Staff Robert Keeth TPO Staff Stephan Harris TPO Staff Vince Wang TPO Staff Aarti Sharma TPO Staff Marie Kerr Citizen, New Smyrna Beach Adam Burghdoff Kittelson & Associates Mark Manwell ETM Travis Terpstra Volusia County Jon Cheney Volusia County Traffic Engineering

I. Call to Order / Roll Call / Determination of Quorum

Chairperson Craig called the meeting of the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) to order at 1:36 p.m. The roll was called and it was determined that a quorum was present.

II. Press/Citizen Comments There were no press/citizen comments.

4

III. Consent Agenda

A. Review and Approval of March 21, 2017 CAC Meeting Minutes

MOTION: A motion was made by Ms. Gillespie to approve the March 21, 2017 CAC meeting minutes. The motion was seconded by Mr. Peterson and carried unanimously.

IV. Action Items

A. Review and Recommend Approval of Request from Volusia County to Increase Funding for the

Construction Phase of the Doyle Road Paved Shoulders Project Mr. Keeth stated this item was on the agenda last month and by request from Volusia County it was deferred because they did not have key staff in the audience to answer questions. This application is for paved shoulders on Doyle Road from Lush Lane to Courtland Boulevard for purposes of safety. In 2011, the initial cost estimate was just under $500,000 and when it was programmed for construction in June of 2015 the cost estimate had been inflated in accordance with FDOT’s standard of inflation factors to $677,000. About a year ago, Volusia County prepared a new estimate, presented that to the TPO and asked that the cost increase be funded. The cost estimate is currently $1.035 million and represents an increase of $358,000 over the programmed amount of $677,000. The cost increase is due in part to a general increase in construction costs that were higher than anticipated. There are also new items in the cost estimate that warrant attention; mobilization increased by $45,000, maintenance of traffic $45,000, clearing and grubbing increased by $90,000, excavation by $85,000, embankment by $100,000 and concrete sidewalks increased by $55,000. Volusia County is asking for approval of this request for the cost increase. He introduced Mr. Travis Terpstra, Volusia County Public Works Department, to answer any questions. Mr. Peterson commented he had opposed this item last month and was even more concerned now. Looking at the agenda on page 29, listing the itemized cost increases, mobilization and maintenance have increased 100%. Clearing and grubbing is up $90,000 when the original estimate was $10,000; so now it is $100,000. Excavation was originally $15,000 and is up $85,000; these are massive increases. The embankment and concrete sidewalks are a total of $155,000 and were not even listed on the original estimate. He appreciates that was proposed in 2011 has somewhat changed but these increases indicate that the original estimate was poorly done. The TPO policy is that any increase in cost is to be paid for by the county or the city involved. There are reasons for changes but he wants to know why there are such massive changes that will require the TPO to change its policy and procedures to allow this type of increase. Mr. Terpstra replied the county has observed that costs have gone up steadily by significant amounts over the last few years so last year during the call for projects, the county did a thorough project review of applications that had been submitted to the TPO in an attempt to update cost estimates across the board. This project had already been programmed and that means an adjustment or update cannot be done without TPO Board action. The biggest cost increase is inflation since 2011; mobilization and maintenance of traffic are considered 10% of the total. Some of the changes included conflicts between the paved shoulders with existing sidewalks which requires the sidewalks to be moved back so additional clearing and grub work is required. There is a small section of a new sidewalk to make a connection to a city park and help in a school area. Mr. Feldman commented he understands that from 2011 to 2017 the costs will go up but this is a 48% increase over the projected amount from June of 2015. It seems like a lot in just two years and he is not able to reconcile that with the explanation.

5

Mr. Terpstra replied the TPO adjusts for inflation at 3% per year so that the 2011 cost at 3% per year were probably not adequate in 2015. The funding is for 2018 so it is another three years out. Mr. Feldman commented that is still a 40% increase; he asked where the additional $358,000 would come from and if it would come from another project. Mr. Keeth replied no; this money is already on the project in FDOT’s Work Program. This action is going to bring the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) in line with what the Work Program now shows. In this case, it is the TIP that controls; if this change is not approved, the FDOT will have to amend its Work Program and remove those funds. The funds are available and ready to go. Mr. Ferguson stated the funds are on there because the funds are available. The funds did not come from any other project; the funds came from other projects that came in under budget and it helps those projects that go over budget. Mr. Feldman asked to confirm that no other project will suffer from this allocation. Mr. Keeth replied that there is not another project available to use these funds on at this time. Mr. Ferguson stated that is correct; there is not time to get another project up and ready by the end of June. Mr. D’Antonio asked if the update did not get included in the TIP because it would have required a TIP amendment since the project was already programmed when the county came with the cost update last year. Mr. Keeth replied it was programmed at his request; it had not been approved by the TPO. It was his error in requesting that it get programmed. Mr. D’Antonio asked what the benefit was of adding paved shoulders and if sidewalks were being added where there were none. Mr. Terpstra replied safety and adding sidewalks. MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. D’Antonio to recommend approval of the request from Volusia

County to increase funding for the construction phase of the Doyle Road paved shoulders project. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ball.

Mr. Bove asked when the project was scheduled to go to construction. Mr. Keeth replied 2018. Mr. Bove asked what will happen when the construction bids come in higher or lower than the actual construction cost. Mr. Terpstra replied that is why the county looked at all the current projects on the list with the TPO during the call for projects last year; to update cost estimates to be more in line with what the actual cost might be. The county does not anticipate coming back for more funding. Mr. Bove asked if in the county’s cost estimate process, they accounted for unknowns, contingencies or factors that alleviate these issues. Mr. Terpstra replied yes, in the initial stages cost estimates should be more conservative to allow for those types of contingencies.

6

Mr. Ferguson stated FDOT does not allow for explicit funding of contingencies but does have to allow for inflation. For FDOT’s projects, the inflation annual increase is 20%, so a two year inflation would be a 40% increase. Ms. Bledsoe asked if the county had the $358,000 available. Mr. Terpstra replied no, not for this project; it is not budgeted. Ms. Bledsoe asked how the county reconciled the TPO’s resolution that states that whoever is promoting the project has to pay for the cost overruns. Mr. Terpstra replied that is why the county looked at all the cost estimates again to get updated costs. Chairperson Craig commented this project, and especially the sidewalks are for safety reasons. Children are walking to school and to a park. Doyle Road is an extremely unsafe road to be on; there are entrances to I-4 and a lot of another things going on. To be able to have the children walk in safety is extremely important. Mr. Peterson asked if the available funds were not used by June 30 would they be lost. Mr. Ferguson replied the funds are added to the Work Program now; if FDOT released them now the funds could be used elsewhere and this project could suffer. If county does not have the funds to pursue the project in 2018 all of that money goes back to the FDOT and that would mean the TPO would have to find a lot of projects that would all have to be delivered in 2018. Most agencies require at least a year for design. Mr. Peterson asked if the funds were not lost could they be redistributed during 2017/18 to other projects if the TPO so decides. Mr. Ferguson replied that is speculative; this project is ready and it seems a shame to lose that. Mr. Feldman asked for clarification that these funds are coming from FDOT, it is encumbered by FDOT for the project and the TPO is basically amending its plan for the year to include this money. Mr. Ferguson replied that is correct; the TPO does have explicit control over the money and that is what this is all about. Mr. Feldman asked again for confirmation that no project would suffer if this is approved. He is not questioning the merits of the project, just the funding. Ms. Gillespie stated if the project was submitted in 2011 for 2018, did the county make a mistake and how this got missed last year. Mr. Terpstra replied the county did catch it last year; the project was submitted in March 2016 during the call for projects. Due to the TPO’s processes, it was not able to be incorporated last year because funding had been allocated a few months prior. Ms. Gillespie asked if it was because it was too close to the other money received. Mr. Keeth replied once a project is programmed the funds can only be amended through the TPO review. The TPO could not adjust the amount on that project when the revised estimate was submitted last year because the project had already been programmed and it required it be moved through this review. Mr. Ferguson stated this is the reason things got locked down last year. The way the federal government looks at the use of their funds is it is either needed or it is not needed; and if it is not needed, they will take

7

it away and give it to an area that does need it. Needing it means it has been assigned to a project and not needing it means it is sitting in a funding reserve box. That had been the pattern here, only programming out a couple of years which does allow some flexibility but makes it look like the funds are not needed. FDOT has begun to correct this through the TPO and had been programming farther out; the federal government wants projects programmed four years out and the state prefers five years out. Circumstances are that costs are going up and are going to require additional funds. Eventually, projects will be programmed five years before the funds are used. FDOT will try to build in inflation factors, but when inflation soars on transportation projects, like it is now, it is hard to project the cost. The economy could take a downward turn and then all the estimates would be high. Ms. Bledsoe commented as a discussion item, that in the 2016 resolution regarding cost overruns, the word “shall” is used and “shall” means they should pay for it themselves. There are twenty different political subdivisions and each come for more money. She suggested an amendment to the motion to change the language to “may” instead of “shall”. Mr. Keeth replied the policy does need to be reconsidered. It is very difficult to project costs several years in advance. It is customary for a project sponsor to review projects periodically. Projects are often programmed years before construction occurs and once they are programmed the policy kicks in and allows no flexibility other than this amendment process. It does need to be revisited, to find a better way while holding the project applicants accountable to some degree. Chairperson Craig introduced new CAC member Ms. Patricia Lipovsky, appointed by Volusia County Council Member Billie Wheeler. Ms. Lipovsky asked what would happen to the leftover money if the county was allowed the extra funding and it was not all used. Mr. Keeth replied this is a reimbursable fund program. FDOT will pay the bill when the project sponsor submits the bill; no money is advanced so there is no money to return.

A hand count vote was taken with nine approving the motion and four opposing. The motion carried.

B. Review and Recommend Approval of Request from South Daytona to Increase Funding for the

Construction Phase of the Big Tree Road Shared Use Path Mr. Harris stated this project was recommended in the Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Study for South Daytona in 2009 with a cost estimate of $500,000. In 2011, the city applied for construction funding for that amount. The city had already undertaken the design and requested $500,000 for construction and that was the amount programmed. The city is asking for additional funds because of a more recent cost estimate date March 31, 2017. The current construction cost estimate is $607,000 which represents inflation and unforeseen costs such as replacing a pedestrian signal, extending pedestrian railing and for crosswalk improvements. The TPO does have the policy addressing cost overruns and the resolution containing that policy is included in the agenda. Chairperson Craig asked what the LAP funds are. Mr. Harris replied LAP funds are Local Agency Program funds. The federal funds that the TPO has allocated to this project are $500,000; there are additional local funds on this project because the city is required to provide a 10% match. Those are not included; the $500,000 is federal funds. The additional amount the city is asking for is in federal or state funds from the TPO. Ms. Lipovsky asked what part of Big Tree Road this construction would be and what it would cover.

8

Mr. Harris replied in addition to inflation it would cover additional work such as replacing a pedestrian signal, extending pedestrian railings and patterned pavement in a crosswalk along the shopping center. This shared use path runs from Nova Road to east of Segrave Street; those are the project limits. Chairperson Craig commented this is from the Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Study and is for the South Daytona Elementary School. Big Tree Road is a busy road and safety issues need attention. Ms. Lipovsky asked if this would be done on both sides of the road. Mr. Harris replied only on the south side. Mr. Peterson asked where the federal funds were coming from and what they were originally earmarked for. Mr. Harris replied these would be Advanced Construction (ACSU) funds. Mr. Peterson replied no, they are asking federal funds of $107,000 and he asked where those funds are allocated now. Mr. Harris replied the funds are not allocated to any given project right now; the TPO receives a certain amount of ACSU funds each year. They are not on any given project until the TPO allocates them. Mr. Peterson asked if there was a project design with no change, why the original estimate did not include the replacement of the pedestrian signal and extended railing. He thinks this is an error in the original cost and should not be approved at this point. This money is coming out of reserves that could be used for other projects. This is another item in conflict with TPO policy. Mr. Feldman asked how long the shared use path is. Mr. Harris replied the path is approximately 5,000 feet. Ms. Lipovsky asked if the pedestrian signal was going to be replaced with an accessible pedestrian signal (APS). Mr. Harris replied he cannot answer on behalf of the city. The BPAC approved this funding request last week but there was extensive discussion as to the desirability of an APS signal. The BPAC thought it was a worthy addition to this project but the funding was approved without it. It is not in the current scope; the city would have to revise the design, as the current plans do not call for it to be included. Ms. Bledsoe asked if there was a length of time that a project remains on the list to be funded before it is withdrawn and the money reallocated. Mr. Keeth replied if a project is not programmed within three years due to the fault of the applicant, the project is removed. Ms. Bledsoe asked if this project started in 2009, submitted in 2011 and it is now 2017, if that fit in that particular regulation. Mr. Keeth replied if it was not programmed due to the responsibilities of the project applicant, yes, it should be removed, but that is not case here. Mr. Harris stated it was programmed in 2011; the programming is in the current year, fiscal year (FY) 2017. It was put in the Work Program several years ago.

9

Ms. Gillespie stated the city has a lot of drainage built into this project, and these things are city enterprise funded projects and they should pay for that. The normal maintenance expenses should be removed and the amount of money needed would not be as much. MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. Storke to recommend approval of the request from South

Daytona to increase funding for the construction phase of the Big Tree Road shared use path. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bove. A hand count vote was taken with nine approving and five opposing. The motion carried.

V. Presentation Items

A. Presentation and Discussion of the R2CTPO’s Draft Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans

Ms. Blankenship stated the TPO is updating its Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans and that it had been two years since they were last updated. Title VI provides that the TPO cannot discriminate on the basis of race, color or national origin; there are other Titles that cover age, disability and other items. She reviewed the changes and additions to the Title VI Plan. Ms. Blankenship stated the LEP requires that the TPO take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to the TPO’s programs, services and activities to those that do not speak English well. She reviewed the changes and additions. These draft plans area available for review and comment for the next 30 days and will be adopted next month. Mr. Peterson asked if the TPO Survey has to be provided in Spanish. Ms. Blankenship replied the TPO does not have to, but chooses to. Mr. Peterson stated he was a strong proponent that anyone living in this country should learn English. He asked how much it cost the TPO to print the survey in Spanish instead of inserting a line stating that it could be provided if necessary. Ms. Blankenship replied she was not sure and introduced Mr. Adam Burghdoff, Kittelson and Associates, to answer as he is the consultant that works on the survey with the TPO. Mr. Burghdoff replied he did not have the exact specifics; the website that was developed for the survey was developed in English and Spanish. There were very few printed surveys disseminated and filled out and returned. The printed surveys were printed on the TPO’s copier in black and white. Ms. Blankenship replied the copies are $0.06 per black and white copy. Mr. Feldman asked if LEP was a federal mandate. Ms. Blankenship replied yes.

B. Presentation and Discussion of Updates to the Florida Greenways and Trail System (FGTS) Plan and the

Opportunity and Priority Maps Mr. Harris gave a PowerPoint presentation and stated the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) is the statewide trail system with many types of trails. The plan is the vision for implementing a connected system of these trails. The plan was created in 1998 and authorized by the Florida Legislature in 1999. The existing plan and priority maps were last updated in 2012, the opportunity maps in 2015 and they are in the current update cycle for the next plan for 2018-2022. He showed the land trail opportunity and priority corridor maps. The TPO is concerned with the land trail maps; federal funds only allow the TPO to fund paved land trails. The opportunity portions of these land trails are existing, planned and conceptual trails that are part of the statewide system. The priority trails are the most important within the

10

opportunity maps. There are four corridors proposed to be updated; two going north-south and two going east/west. The north/south corridors are the Bunnell to Ormond Corridor (US 1 Trail) and the Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor (the Graham Swamp Trail) and are being proposed to be extended as far north as possible within the planning area and elevated to priority. The east/west corridors are the SR 40 Trail Corridor and the Cross Volusia Trail Corridor and are being proposed to be elevated to priority with the same limits and no extensions. Chairperson Craig asked if this item would be back for approval. Mr. Harris replied yes, next month. Mr. Bove commented that trails are like roads and are multi-jurisdictional and asked if the TPO was coordinating with St. Johns County to understand what their master plan is or is not. He asked if anything was planned in the neighboring jurisdiction where the TPO’s boundary ends. Mr. Harris replied he was not sure of the trail plans in St. John’s County. The TPO has coordinated with Flagler County, Palm Coast and Volusia County because those are the jurisdictions responsible for building and maintaining the trails. Mr. Peterson asked if the trails were paved and able to be used for walking and biking. Mr. Harris replied yes, they are all paved facilities.

C. Presentation and Discussion of Pedestrian Crash Statistics

Mr. Harris gave a PowerPoint presentation on pedestrian safety. He covered the five “Es” of safety; education, encouragement, engineering, enforcement and evaluation, and stated the TPO incorporates these in its overall safety program. He explained that consultants such as Kittleson & Associates assist with engineering, the TPO partners with law enforcement on enforcement, and covers the education and encouragement at different helmet fitting events throughout the year. He went over the national statistics on pedestrian safety and fatalities, state statistics and local statistics. The Daytona Beach-Deltona-Ormond Beach area ranked number five in the Dangerous by Design Report from 2016. The TPO sets aside 30% of its annual funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects and $100,000 for bicycle and pedestrian feasibility studies. In addition to that, the TPO sets aside monies from the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for local initiatives. The TPO participates in at least a dozen events a year to encourage and educate on bicycle and pedestrian safety. He went over the pedestrian plans and the feasibility studies recently completed, public awareness efforts and pedestrian safety best practices. Mr. Peterson asked if the correlation between alcohol and pedestrian fatalities referred to the driver or the pedestrian. Mr. Harris replied it could be both. Mr. Peterson asked if the data used clarified if it was the driver, pedestrian or both. Mr. Harris said no; the crash reports would have to be drilled down more in detail. Mr. Peterson stated he understands emphasizing road safety but if there is a major problem with pedestrians not following the rules and regulations or being impaired in some manner, we could be looking at the wrong solution to the problem. Mr. Harris replied when alcohol is involved it could be a drunk driver, a drunk pedestrian or a combination of both.

11

Mr. Ferguson stated that the identification of US 1 as being the most dangerous corridor for pedestrians was just mirrored in the Ft. Lauderdale area. The report did not say where on US 1 so it could be widespread from there to here. It may be worth taking a closer look at.

D. Presentation and Discussion of Project Applications Received from the Annual Call for Projects (Handout provided) Mr. Keeth stated the TPO just concluded the annual call for projects on March 31, 2017 and received 50 project applications. The call for projects is the process used to identify many of the transportation projects funded through the TPO. This process focuses on traffic operations and safety projects, bicycle/ pedestrian projects, transportation enhancement projects and transportation planning studies. It does not include transportation capacity projects such as new roadways or lane additions; those are identified and ranked through the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and moved to the priority project list. The project applications received were about equally divided between traffic operations and safety projects and bicycle/pedestrian projects, with 22 and 23 received respectively. Within those categories the TPO received equal numbers of applications for feasibility studies and project implementations. Of the applications received, 42 were from Volusia County and 8 from Flagler County which is the exact same number of applications per capita. There was also a good distribution from city to city; 14 cities submitted applications. These project applications will be reviewed by the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Subcommittee, which will focus on the traffic operations and safety projects and transportation planning studies, and the BPAC Project Review Subcommittee, which will review the bicycle and pedestrian projects. These two subcommittees will meet this week to begin the evaluation and ranking of the projects. In the course of that review, the subcommittees will be screening the projects to ensure they all are eligible and have fully complied with the application requirements. There are a few projects that have raised red flags for the TPO and the subcommittees will be asked to look at those in particular. He briefly covered a couple of red flag projects; the Nova Road widening project, a Saul Street traffic calming island and the East International Speedway Boulevard (ISB) Corridor Improvement project. The TPO is pleased with the range of projects received and many of these were identified in the corridor studies and other studies the TPO has done. This is a great opportunity for project costs and other information to be updated and he encouraged anyone that had a special interest in any of these projects to attend the meetings. Mr. Blais asked if the East International Speedway Boulevard (ISB) beachside corridor project was one way street to redo the traffic or do away with the beach toll booth. Mr. Keeth replied no, the project limits are from the river to the beach and involves the installation of a median barrier to limit left hand turn movements and possibly involving a roundabout at SR A1A and US 92. It also includes bicycle and pedestrian improvements as well. The city submitted this as a traffic operations/safety project and as a bicycle/pedestrian project. Mr. Blais asked how many dollars it involved. Mr. Keeth replied it is a multi-million dollar project.

E. Presentation and Discussion of the Flagler Bicycle & Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies (Part 2) Mr. Adam Burghdoff, Kittelson & Associates, gave a PowerPoint presentation update on the Flagler Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies and stated there were seven schools in the study. The four schools in part 2 are Wadsworth Elementary, Buddy Taylor Middle School, Old Kings Elementary and Bunnell Elementary. Reports of the studies have been distributed to the stakeholders; the cities and Flagler County, FDOT and the school staff. The schools studied in 2016 were Belle Terre Elementary, Indian Trails Middle School, which are co-located school sites and Rymfire Elementary. Wadsworth Elementary and Buddy Taylor Middle School are also co-located school sites and it was noted that the park located on the east side was creating friction with the school circulation with arrival and dismissal periods. A lot of the

12

issues observed around these all seven sites are related to parent pick-up and drop off; queuing on site, parents not wanting to wait through the serpentine snake so they are dropping students off on the side of the road that is creating conflict points where there are crosswalks and driveways. Some improvements identified that can potentially offset some of these issues are programmatic in nature such as encouraging walking/biking to school, car pooling and educating parents. The low volume roadways in smaller neighborhoods have been identified; there is new technology and new research underway that considers giving part of the road to the non-motorist called an advisory shoulder. There was an article published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regarding this and FHWA is looking for pilot programs and there could be research dollars available if an agency is willing to implement something like this. It does not exist in Florida, but might be worth considering because it could be cost advantageous rather than sidewalks. He is sure the TPO would be willing to work with an agency that may be considering implementing something like this.

F. Presentation and Discussion of Resiliency to Sea Level Rise, Storm Surge and Coastal Flooding

Mr. Harris stated that last year the TPO adopted a Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Study which included a tool used to model sea level rise. The TPO had a workshop with local stakeholders to train them on using this tool. This is the second phase of that study; to take sea level rise and put storm surge and coastal flooding elements on top of it. This year there are new impact areas as a result of the 100 year storm coastal flooding events and storm surge that was also modeled. Implementation strategies were also identified. He went over evacuation routes, critical facilities, transportation facilities, public works facilities and shelters. The two models of the phase are Coastal Flood Hazards model which FEMA uses to develop their flood insurance rate maps and relies on the 100 year still water elevation and still water depth to identify impacts of storm surge. The second model is the Coastal Surge model where storm surge and wave modeling is used to develop an estimate for wind and flood losses for a single hurricane event. He went over the sea level rise impacts with coastal flooding and the three target years of 2040, 2070 and 2100. He reviewed the financial exposure and some of the losses caused from sea level rise with coastal flooding could reach over $11 billion. There is a low, intermediate and high level curve. An analysis was done of Hurricane Dora, the last category 3 hurricane to make landfall in 1964 that was used as a model. Hurricane Matthew came close enough but was so recent the data was not available. The next step is to adopt the report and develop a resiliency action plan and incorporate that into TPO documents. Chairperson Craig suggested putting this on the agenda for next month as a discussion item due to a lack of time.

G. FDOT Report

Mr. Ferguson gave the FDOT report and gave details of various projects.

H. Volusia and Flagler County Construction Reports

Ms. Winsett gave the Volusia County Construction Report; there was no Flagler County Construction Report.

VI. Staff Comments ® Update on SunRail

There was no update.

® Update on SR A1A Stabilization There was no update.

® Update on the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study

13

There was no update.

® Update on development of the new FY 2017/18- FY 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Mr. Keeth announced the deadline for the opportunity to comment on the scope of work for Votran’s Bus Stop Improvement Plan is April 28, 2017.

VII. CAC Member Comments

There were no member comments.

VIII. Information Items

® March 22, 2017 River to Sea TPO Board Meeting Summary ® March TPO Outreach and Events ® Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Public Meeting Notice

IX. Adjournment There being no further business, the CAC meeting adjourned at 3:04 p.m.

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

_______________________________________ JUDY CRAIG, CHAIRPERSON

CITIZENS’ ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the minutes of the April 18, 2017 regular meeting of the Citizens’ Advisory Committee (CAC), approved and duly signed this 16th day of May 2017. ______________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

14

Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC)

Meeting Minutes

April 18, 2017

TCC Members Present: Representing: Fred Griffith Bunnell Fred Ferrell Daytona Beach Mike Holmes DeLand Ron Paradise Deltona Darren Lear Edgewater Larry Newsom Flagler Beach Tom Harowski Holly Hill Becky Mendez Orange City Ric Goss, Vice Chairman Ormond Beach Jose Papa Palm Coast Mark Karet Pierson Aref Joulani Ponce Inlet Tim Burman, Chairman Port Orange John Dillard South Daytona Jon Cheney V.C. Traffic Engineering Eric Kozielski Volusia County School District Heather Blanck Votran Gene Ferguson (non-voting advisor) FDOT District 5

TCC Members Absent: Representing: Stewart Cruz Daytona Beach Shores Arlene Smith Daytona Beach Int’l Airport Matt Boerger DeBary Faith Alkhatib F.C. Traffic Engineering Jason Yarborough Lake Helen Amye King (excused) New Smyrna Beach Larry LaHue V.C. Emergency Management Others Present: Representing: Debbie Stewart, Recording Secretary TPO Staff Robert Keeth TPO Staff Pamela Blankenship TPO Staff Lois Bollenback TPO Staff Stephan Harris TPO Staff Vince Wang TPO Staff Aarti Sharma TPO Staff Rich Walton Daytona Beach Auba Joseph DeLand Heather Roberts Kimley-Horn Lisa Buscher FDOT Jason Klempin FDOT Jake Baker Ponce Inlet Heather Roberts Kimley-Horn Mark Manwell ETM Andrea Ostrodka Lochner Travis Terspstra Volusia County Traffic Engineering

15

I. Call to Order / Roll Call / Determination of Quorum

Chairman Tim Burman called the meeting of the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) to order at 3:12 p.m. The roll was called and it was determined that a quorum was present.

II. Press/Citizen Comments There were no press/citizen comments.

III. Consent Agenda A. Review and Approval of March 21, 2017 TCC Meeting Minutes

MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. Lear to approve the March 21, 2017 TCC meeting minutes. The

motion was seconded by Mr. Cheney and carried unanimously.

IV. Action Items

A. Review and Recommend Approval of Request from Volusia County to Increase Funding for the Construction Phase of the Doyle Road Paved Shoulders Project Mr. Keeth stated this item was on the agenda last month and by request from Volusia County it was deferred because they did not have key staff in the audience to answer questions. This application is for paved shoulders on Doyle Road from Lush Lane to Courtland Boulevard for purposes of safety. In 2011 the initial cost estimate was just under $500,000 and when it was programmed for construction in June of 2015 the cost estimate had been inflated in accordance with FDOT’s standard of inflation factors to $677,000. About a year ago, Volusia County prepared a new estimate, presented that to the TPO and asked that the cost increase be funded. The cost estimate is currently $1.35 million and represents an increase of $358,000 over the programmed amount of $677,000. The cost increase is due in part to a general increase in construction costs higher than anticipated. There are also new items in the cost estimate that warrant attention: mobilization increased by $45,000, maintenance of traffic $45,000, clearing and grubbing increased by $90,000, excavation by $85,000, embankment by $100,000 and concrete sidewalks increased by $55,000. Volusia County is asking for approval of this request for the cost increase. Mr. Cheney stated since the project is already programmed, Mr. Ferguson will speak on additional information pertinent to this worthy project. He then introduced new Volusia County engineer, Mr. Travis Terpstra, who will answer any questions. Mr. Ferguson stated this project was added to FDOT’s Work Program last year during the application of the Advanced Construction (ACSU) funds. The reason it is important to program these funds is because FDOT has a target that has to be met. If the target is met, agencies can go above the minimum. The TPO worked with FDOT to identify projects that were known to need additional funds and applied the funds to those projects, as well as any new projects that could realistically be advanced within that time frame. All of that was done last fall. Mr. Terpstra replied the county has observed that costs have steadily gone up by significant amounts over the last few years so last year during the call for projects, the county did a thorough project review of applications that had been submitted to the TPO in an attempt to update cost estimates across the board. This project had already been programmed, which means an adjustment or update cannot be done without TPO Board action.

16

Mr. Ferrell asked if the project was 100% funded. Mr. Ferguson replied yes. Mr. Paradise asked if the cost estimates were Volusia County’s estimates based on recent bid activity and not actual bids that have come in for the project. Mr. Terpstra replied the county uses a variety of sources to compare estimates; mainly FDOT. It also uses county bid projects that have come in to make comparisons. Mr. Paradise asked if the funds used were ACSU funds. Mr. Ferguson replied yes. Mr. Paradise asked how much was available in the ACSU fund. Mr. Ferguson replied it is inaccurate to talk about as a fixed sum; it is a budgeted amount that is assigned to FDOT. As money ebbs and flows through FDOT, it grows and shrinks over time. No one has informed him that it is running low and since it is close to the end of the fiscal year, that suggests there is more available. Mr. Paradise stated he is not adverse to cost overruns and thinks this is a worthy project for a number of reasons. He asked how sustainable this rush for funds is to address all these overruns and commented he would like to have the opportunity to take advantage of it. He wonders which local governments will request more money before it is gone. Mr. Cheney stated everyone knows that bids are coming in higher because of this project and others like it. Back in November, he asked when the county could submit revised cost estimates and the answer was they could be submitted at any time, they did not have to wait for the call for projects. This information was given to the Engineering and Construction Department so when they did their internal review, updates would get out in a more timely manner. There used to be an internal mechanism called an intake meeting within FDOT after the design to review the cost estimates to make sure they were accurate. FDOT no longer does this. He has spoken to Ms. Bollenback about asking for those intake meetings to occur when they have partnership meetings to have a better feel of the true cost. The county is working to resolve the issue. The mega projects in Orlando are sapping everyone’s bids. Regarding the Turnbull Bay Bridge project, the county was fortunate to receive the extra funds and was able to value engineer to reduce the cost and give some of the money back to the TPO. Mr. Paradise stated it is well understood that the price structure is rapidly evolving northward and asked what happens when the bids come in substantially higher than the latest estimate and what the contingency is for that. Mr. Cheney replied there could be a possibility of scaling back the scope of the project and not doing as much, especially with a paved shoulder project. Instead of going from Providence to Kirkland, it could go from Providence to Saxon Boulevard; change the project limits for what money is available and then submit for another project. Mr. Paradise asked if the policy allows a local government to come back and ask again for augmented funds based on the actual bids that come in. Mr. Keeth replied it happened with the bridge and the US 92 project. Mr. Cheney commented it happened for Volusia County on Kepler Road and SR 44; nothing worked so the county pulled the project and asked FDOT to re-allocate the money. Now the county is back submitting a project on behalf of FDOT to reevaluate that intersection to see what solution is technically feasible.

17

Ms. Bollenback stated the ACSU funding is funding that FDOT puts on projects and by moving projects forward and guaranteeing funding, FDOT can take advantage of funds in other areas that have not been obligated. If another area in the state does not obligate all their funding, it becomes available for FDOT to use on sound projects that are ready to go. FDOT fronts this ACSU funding and then replenishes it. Last year, after looking at years of data, the state decided they could do as much as 70% of the regular SU set aside funding. On top of the $5 million the TPO normally receives each year, the ACSU was increased to $7 million. The TPO was asked to find $3-5 million of additional projects. It will last as long as it lasts, but it takes the opportunity to shift funding from the local level to the federal level. It eventually will hit the ceiling but at this point the TPO is at the end of the fiscal year. The opportunity to fund good projects with available federal funds is a good opportunity. Projects do drop out; projects run into problems and have to drop off the list. This keeps the TPO’s obligating authority above the threshold, so if a project does drop out the TPO does not lose obligating authority for the following year. These are great financial mechanisms that FDOT has put in place and the TPO wants to take advantage of it.

MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. Ferrell to recommend of approval of the request from Volusia

County to increase funding for the construction phase of the Doyle Road paved shoulders project. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cheney and carried unanimously.

B. Review and Recommend Approval of Request from South Daytona to Increase Funding for the

Construction Phase of the Big Tree Road Shared Use Path

Mr. Harris stated this project was recommended in the Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Study for South Daytona in 2009 with a cost estimate of $500,000. In 2011, the city applied for construction funding for that amount. The city had already undertaken the design and requested $500,000 for construction and that was the amount programmed. The city is asking for additional funds because of a more recent cost estimate dated March 31, 2017. The current construction cost estimate is $607,000 which represents inflation and unforeseen costs such as replacing a pedestrian signal, extending pedestrian railing and for crosswalk improvements. The TPO does have a policy addressing cost overruns and the resolution containing that policy is included in the agenda. Mr. Cheney commented Volusia County was one of the participants that reviewed the plans and asked for some of the unforeseen work to be done. MOTION: A motion was made by Mr. Cheney to recommend approval of request from South Daytona

to increase funding for the construction phase of the Big Tree Road shared use path. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ferrell and carried unanimously.

V. Presentation Items

A. Presentation and Discussion of the R2CTPO’s Draft Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans

Ms. Blankenship stated the TPO is updating its Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans and that it had been two years since they were last updated. Title VI provides that the TPO cannot discriminate on the basis of race, color or national origin; there are other Titles that cover age, disability and other items. She reviewed the changes and additions to the Title VI Plan. Ms. Blankenship stated the LEP requires that the TPO take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to the TPO’s programs, services and activities to those that do not speak English well. She reviewed the changes and additions. These draft plans are available for review and comment for the next 30 days and they will be adopted next month.

B. Presentation and Discussion of Updates to the Florida Greenways and Trail System (FGTS) Plan and the

Opportunity and Priority Maps

18

Mr. Harris gave a PowerPoint presentation and stated the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) is the statewide trail system with many types of trails. The plan is the vision for implementing a connected system of these trails. The plan was created in 1998 and authorized by the Florida Legislature in 1999. The existing plan and priority maps were last updated in 2012, the opportunity maps in 2015, and they are in the current update cycle for the next plan for 2018-2022. He showed the land trail opportunity and priority corridor maps. The TPO is concerned with the land trail maps; federal funds only allow the TPO to fund paved land trails. The opportunity portions of these land trails are existing, planned and conceptual trails that are part of the statewide system. The priority trails are the most important within the opportunity maps. There are four corridors proposed to be updated; two going north-south and two going east/west. The north/south corridors are the Bunnell to Ormond Corridor (US 1 Trail) and the Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor (the Graham Swamp Trail) and are being proposed to be extended as far north as possible within the planning area and elevated to priority. The east/west corridors are the SR 40 Trail Corridor and the Cross Volusia Trail Corridor and are being proposed to be elevated to be priority with the same limits and no extensions. Mr. Karet asked what the impact was of making this a priority. Mr. Harris replied the hope is to put it in line for state funding, particularly for SunTrail funding. Mr. Ferguson commented that Flagler County received funding for the Grand Swamp Trail that connects to the Lehigh Trail and that design should be starting in a year or two.

C. Presentation and Discussion of Pedestrian Crash Statistics

Mr. Harris gave a PowerPoint presentation on pedestrian safety. He covered the five “Es” of safety; education, encouragement, engineering, enforcement and evaluation, and stated the TPO incorporates these in its overall safety program. He explained that consultants such as Kittleson & Associates assist with engineering, the TPO partners with law enforcement on enforcement, and covers the education and encouragement at different helmet fitting events throughout the year. He went over the national statistics on pedestrian safety and fatalities, state statistics and local statistics. The Daytona Beach-Deltona-Ormond Beach area ranked number five in the Dangerous by Design Report from 2016. The TPO sets aside 30% of its annual funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects and $100,000 for bicycle and pedestrian feasibility studies. In addition to that, the TPO sets aside monies from the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for local initiatives. The TPO participates in at least a dozen events a year to encourage and educate on bicycle and pedestrian safety. He went over the pedestrian plans and the feasibility studies recently completed, public awareness efforts and pedestrian safety best practices.

Mr. Cheney asked if the TPO had not just approved several projects for lights on state roads. Mr. Keeth replied yes. Mr. Cheney commented that maybe the focus was on the wrong problem or wrong location. Mr. Harris stated the time and day of the crashes correlate to the high fatalities at night. He reviewed more evidence that pedestrian fatalities occur overwhelming at night. Mr. Cheney asked if this data also correlates to intoxication. Mr. Harris replied that yes, alcohol involvement is a factor in about half; drunk driving, drunk walking or both. Mr. Cheney commented that most bars close at 2:00 am. Mr. Harris replied that the hours between midnight and 6:00 am are also a problem. He reviewed local statistics on pedestrian fatalities and the roadways associated with them.

19

Mr. Cheney referred to the table of local statistics and asked if the TPO could develop its own index as a comparison to the Dangerous by Design Report for each of the local jurisdictions. He also asked what data was not applicable and if it was the unincorporated part of the county. Mr. Harris replied the unincorporated areas of Volusia County are not applicable. Mr. Cheney asked if when pulling the statistics did the study account for and remove parking lots, private roads and driveways. Mr. Harris replied no, these statistics come straight from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) as is. The TPO did not make any modifications. He continued to review the statistics. Mr. Ferguson stated the lighting bundles FDOT did partially involve pedestrians as well as vehicles as part of the safety program and it was where crashes were happening at night. These were highway safety program funds and required a cost benefit ratio of 2:1.

D. Presentation and Discussion of Project Applications Received from the Annual Call for Projects

(Handout provided) Mr. Keeth stated the TPO just concluded the annual call for projects on March 31, 2017 and received 50 project applications. The call for projects is the process used to identify many of the transportation projects funded through the TPO. This process focuses on traffic operations and safety projects, bicycle/ pedestrian projects, transportation enhancement projects and transportation planning studies. It does not include transportation capacity projects such as new roadways or lane additions; those are identified and ranked through the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and moved to the priority project list. The project applications received were about equally divided between traffic operations and safety projects and bicycle/pedestrian projects, with 22 and 23 received respectively. Within those categories the TPO received equal numbers of applications for feasibility studies and project implementations. Of the applications received, 42 were from Volusia County and 8 from Flagler County which is the exact same number of applications per capita. There was also a good distribution from city to city; 14 cities submitted applications. These project applications will be reviewed by the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Subcommittee which will focus on the traffic operations and safety projects and transportation planning studies and the BPAC Project Review Subcommittee will review the bicycle and pedestrian projects. These two subcommittees will meet this week to begin the evaluation and ranking of the projects. In the course of that review, the subcommittees will be screening the projects to ensure they all are eligible and have fully complied with the application requirements. There are a few projects that have raised red flags for the TPO and the subcommittees will be asked to look at those in particular. He briefly covered a couple of red flag projects; the Nova Road widening project, a Saul Street traffic calming island and the East International Speedway Boulevard (ISB) Corridor Improvement project. The TPO is pleased with the range of projects received and many of these were identified in the corridor studies and other studies the TPO has done. He reminded the committee that the project applications received during the call for projects will be added to the priority project list in accordance with the scores that are applied. This is a great opportunity for project costs and other information to be updated and he encouraged anyone that had a special interest in any of these projects to attend the subcommittee meetings. Mr. Holmes asked if the order of projects listed would be the order they would be reviewed at the meeting. Mr. Keeth replied it was up to the committees to decide that; they are listed in alphabetical order. Mr. Cheney asked if the project applications were available online. Mr. Keeth replied yes and an email notice was sent to the subcommittee members with the link in it. He stated he would send the link to anyone who requests it.

E. Presentation and Discussion of the Flagler Bicycle & Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies (Part 2)

20

Mr. Adam Burghdoff, Kittelson & Associates, gave a PowerPoint presentation update on the Flagler Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies and stated there were seven schools in the study. The four schools in part 2 are Wadsworth Elementary, Buddy Taylor Middle School, Old Kings Elementary and Bunnell Elementary. Reports of the studies have been distributed to the stakeholders; the cities and Flagler County, FDOT and the school staff. The schools studied in 2016 were Belle Terre Elementary, Indian Trails Middle School, which are co-located school sites and Rymfire Elementary. Wadsworth Elementary and Buddy Taylor Middle School are also co-located school sites and it was noted that the park located on the east side was creating friction with the school circulation with arrival and dismissal periods. A lot of the issues observed around these all seven sites are related to parent pick-up and drop off; queuing on site, parents not wanting to wait through the serpentine snake so they are dropping students off on the side of the road that is creating conflict points where there are crosswalks and driveways. Some improvements identified that can potentially offset some of these issues are programmatic in nature such as encouraging walking/biking to school, car pooling and educating parents. The low volume roadways in smaller neighborhoods have been identified; there is new technology and new research underway that considers giving part of the road to the non-motorist called an advisory shoulder. There was an article published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regarding this and FHWA is looking for pilot programs and there could be research dollars available if an agency is willing to implement something like this. It does not exist in Florida, but might be worth considering because it could be cost advantageous rather than sidewalks. He is sure the TPO would be willing to work with an agency that may be considering implementing something like this.

Mr. Harowski referred to the parent drop off/pick-up issues and asked if there was any information on if the students were walking or biking or if it was parents trying to avoid the bus. Mr. Burghdoff replied there is; parallel to this study, two surveys from the Federal Safe Routes to School Program were sent out. One survey was a teacher disseminated survey where the teacher took a show of hands as to how many students were walking, biking, riding the bus or parent drop off. The other survey was completed online by the parents that had more detail as to the locations. The results of those surveys have not been received yet; the federal government is processing them. Bus service is not provided within the walk zones depicted on the maps. State law states that bus service does not need to be provided within two miles of a school; Flagler County has the ability to provide for their elementary schools within one mile. Mr. Harowski commented that Flagler County is a full choice district so parents driving students to a school may not live in that district. Mr. Burghdoff replied that issue has been discussed.

F. Presentation and Discussion of Resiliency to Sea Level Rise, Storm Surge and Coastal Flooding

Mr. Harris stated that last year the TPO adopted a Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Study which included a tool used to model sea level rise. The TPO had a workshop with local stakeholders to train them on using this tool. This is the second phase of that study; it considers potential impacts of sea level rise combined with storm surge and coastal flooding. This year there are new impact areas as a result of the 100 year storm coastal flooding events and storm surge that was also modeled. Implementation strategies were also identified. He went over evacuation routes, critical facilities, transportation facilities, public works facilities and shelters. The two models of the phase are Coastal Flood Hazards model which FEMA uses to develop their flood insurance rate maps and relies on the 100 year still water elevation and still water depth to identify impacts of storm surge. The second model is the Coastal Surge model where storm surge and wave modeling is used to develop an estimate for wind and flood losses for a single hurricane event. He went over the sea level rise impacts with coastal flooding and the three target years of 2040, 2070 and 2100. He reviewed the financial exposure and some of the losses caused from sea level rise with coastal flooding could reach over $11 billion. There is a low, intermediate and high level curve. An analysis was done of Hurricane Dora, the last category 3 hurricane to make landfall in 1964 that was used as a model. Hurricane Matthew came close enough but was so recent the data was not available. The next step is to adopt the report and develop a

21

resiliency action plan and incorporate that into TPO documents, such as the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Mr. Cheney asked what this means and what the implications are of this. Mr. Harris replied the TPO will take the report to the stakeholders to develop an action plan. Mr. Cheney asked what the action plan will address. Mr. Harris replied it will address the resiliency of transportation infrastructure and facilities to the effects of projected coastal flooding and projected sea level rise. Mr. Cheney asked how to sell that to an elected official. Mr. Harris replied that it should be explained to them that this action plan is how we can protect our assets, road assets, shelters and critical facilities against the effects of sea level rise and increased coastal flooding. The TPO will attempt to take the action plan and apply it to the facilities and it will be included in the next 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). This will be the first time an element that addresses sea level rise, coastal flooding and storm surge will be in the LRTP. Mr. Cheney stated the conservative Republicans do not believe in climate change and asked how to sell it to them. Mr. Harris suggested showing them this presentation and telling them that the economic impacts could be upwards of $11 billion by 2100; these are damages to their assets and infrastructure. Mr. Papa commented he thought there were two parts to this study and asked if he missed something; was Flagler County not included? Mr. Harris replied this study was from a grant where Volusia County and the stakeholders participated but not Flagler County; Phase 2 of the study covers Volusia County. The TPO intends to engage the stakeholders in Flagler County and ask if they would like to be a part of this. If so, they will make changes so that this plan incorporates urbanized areas of Flagler County. Another reason Flagler County is not in this study is the East Central Florida Planning Council is the lead agency and Flagler County is not a part of that planning council; it is part of the Northeast Florida Planning Council. This TPO has interlocal agreements with both planning councils so it can incorporate all of its planning area this study. Mr. Papa asked if the same policies and procedures that apply to Volusia County would apply to Flagler County. Mr. Harris replied yes. Mr. Harowski announced the Florida APA State Conference will be held in Daytona Beach in September and for those interested in this topic, there will be a half-day session on techniques and options for responding to sea level rise.

G. FDOT Report

Mr. Ferguson gave the FDOT report and gave specific details of various projects.

G. Volusia and Flagler County Construction Reports

Mr. Cheney gave the Volusia County Construction Report. He stated at last month’s meeting, Mr. Chad Lingenfelter, FDOT, had questions regarding the 10th Street project and the county is still waiting on the agreement from the Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC). Every time the county sends the agreement, FEC comes

22

back wanting more money. Originally, the FEC was going to pay for half of the trestle but they have backed off and now want the county to pay for 100%. If Mr. Lingenfelter is concerned about the railway signal arms and the condition, he can provide the money to the county and the county can incorporate it within the county project. The county is still working out an interlocal agreement with Edgewater and New Smyrna Beach because they are physically moving the road and it is taking longer than anticipated.

VI. Staff Comments

® Update on SunRail There was no update.

® Update on the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study

Mr. Keeth stated the Central Florida Expressway Authority has issued the notice to proceed on the study. For those looking for an opportunity to be involved, they are compiling a stakeholder list and will be coordinating stakeholder meetings through the TPO; the TPO will keep the committee updated.

® Update on SR A1A Stabilization There was no update.

® Update on development of the new FY 2017/18 –FY 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

Mr. Keeth stated the TPO has begun the development of the FY 2017/18-FY 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). He asked for input on the jurisdictions’ locally funded transportation projects; this is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirement that the TPO include significant projects that are locally funded. The draft TIP will be reviewed at the May meetings and adopted in June. Mr. Keeth stated House Bill 865, filed by Representative Matt Caldwell of Lehigh Acres, calls for a fiscal analysis of moving the FDOT District 5 office from DeLand to Bartow; Bartow is not in the district, so it is expected that Bartow and the surrounding will be incorporated into the district. Mr. Keeth stated the TPO was in the process of receiving comments on the scope of the Bus Stop Improvement Plan. The deadline for comments is April 28, 2017. There are some significant implications for the cities and counties when it comes to bus stop improvements.

VII. TCC Member Comments

Mr. Ferguson announced it was his 60th birthday. Mr. Cheney reminded the committee if anyone had 2016 traffic counts to get them to the county so the spreadsheet can be updated. The county counts for 2016 are on the Volusia County website and he requested anyone doing traffic impact analyses to use the county counts. The counts are broken down into a.m., midday and p.m. peaks. The county is developing the critical/near critical map and hopes to have that published soon. There has been an increase in daily traffic, specifically on Williamson Boulevard.

VIII. Information Items

® March 22, 2017 River to Sea TPO Board Meeting Summary ® March TPO Outreach and Events ® Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Public Meeting Notice

IX. Adjournment There being no further business, the TCC meeting adjourned at 4:41 p.m.

23

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

________________________________________ MR. TIM BURMAN, CHAIRMAN

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC)

CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the minutes of the April 18, 2017 regular meeting of the Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC), approved and duly signed this 16th day of May 2017. __________________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

24

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

IV. ACTION ITEMS A. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S

TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT & COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

Background Information: The purpose of the River to Sea TPO’s Title VI Plan is to establish and implement procedures that comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as well as other related federal and state statutes and regulations. These procedures are necessary to conform to Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regulations, as well to Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) guidelines. The TPO’s Title VI plan defines the purpose of Title VI, includes a written process on how to file a Title VI complaint, and describes the complaint investigation process. Title VI states “no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” The River to Sea TPO’s Title VI Plan has been updated to reflect updated Federal Highway Administration requirements. The Title VI Plan is provided for your review and recommended approval.

A draft was provided for review in April. There have been no changes to the document as a result of the review.

ACTION REQUESTED: MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

25

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

RESOLUTION 2017-##

RESOLUTION OF THE RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADOPTING THE TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

_____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) is the duly designated and constituted body responsible for carrying out the urban transportation planning and programming process for Volusia County and portions of Flagler County inclusive of the cities of Flagler Beach, Beverly Beach, and portions of Palm Coast and Bunnell; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes 339.175; 23 U.S.C. 134; and 49 U.S.C. 5303 require that the urbanized area, as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, have a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the comprehensively planned development of the urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO has developed the Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures, whose purpose is to establish and implement procedures that comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), and other related federal and state statutes and regulations, and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO will not exclude participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination anyone on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, income or family status; and WHEREAS, the Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures have been provided for review by the general public, the River to Sea TPO’s Advisory Committees and the River to Sea TPO Board.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the River to Sea TPO that the: 1. River to Sea TPO Board and advisory committees have reviewed and adopted the

River to Sea TPO’s Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures; and the

2. River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization’s Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures are attached hereto as Attachment "A"; and the

4. Chairman of the TPO (or his designee) is hereby authorized and directed to

provide a copy of this resolution along with the adopted Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint Procedures to: a. the Florida Department of Transportation; b. the Federal Highway Administration, via the Florida Department of

26

Transportation; and the c. the Federal Transit Administration, via the Florida Department of

Transportation. DONE AND RESOLVED at the regularly convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on

the 24th day of May 2017.

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

__________________________________________ CITY OF FLAGLER BEACH COMMISSIONER MARSHALL SHUPE

CHAIRMAN, RIVER TO SEA TPO CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution, adopted at a legally convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on May 24, 2017.

ATTEST: _______________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

27

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT AND DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT

The River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (R2CTPO) values diversity and both

welcomes and actively seeks input from all interested parties, regardless of cultural identity,

background or income level. Moreover, the River to Sea TPO does not tolerate discrimination in

any of its programs, services or activities. The River to Sea TPO will not exclude participation in,

deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination anyone on the grounds of race, color, national

origin, sex, age, disability, religion, income or family status. The River to Sea TPO will actively work

to ensure the inclusion of everyone in our community so that the River to Sea TPO's programs,

services and activities represent the diversity we enjoy.

The purpose of the River to Sea TPO Title VI program is to establish and implement procedures

that comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, the

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), and other related federal and state statutes and

regulations. These procedures have been adopted to conform to Federal Transit Administration

(FTA) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regulations, as well as to the Florida

Department of Transportation (FDOT) guidelines.

COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

Filing of Title VI Complaints of Discrimination

Any person who feels that he/she has been subjected to race, color or national origin

discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or other forms of discrimination based

upon sex, age, disability, religion, family or income status discrimination under related

nondiscrimination laws and regulations, may file a complaint with the River to Sea TPO.

28

A complaint must be filed within one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of the alleged

discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by the FTA, FHWA or other federal authorities.

If possible, complaints should be submitted in writing, signed by the complainant or his/her

representative(s), and must include the following information:

1. Complainant(s) name, address and telephone number

2. Basis of the complaint (i.e. race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, family or

income discrimination)

3. Date of the alleged discrimination

4. Statement of the complaint

5. Other agencies (state, local or federal) where the complaint has been filed

6. Explanation of the actions the complainant has taken or proposed to resolve the allegation in

the complaint

Allegations of discrimination received via facsimile, mail or e-mail will be acknowledged and

processed within five (5) business days. Allegations received by telephone will be documented in

writing and provided to the complainant(s) for review before processing. If the complainant is

hearing or speech-impaired, call the Florida Relay Service (FRS) by dialing 711 or 1-800-955-8771

(TTY) or email the Title VI Coordinator for assistance.

Complaints should be submitted to:

River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization

ATTN: Pamela Blankenship, Title VI Coordinator

2570 W. International Speedway Boulevard, Suite 100

Daytona Beach, FL 32114

Phone: 386.226.0422, ext. 20416

Fax: 386.226.0428

pblankenship@r2ctpo.org

Complaint Investigation

Upon receipt of a signed complaint, the River to Sea TPO Title VI Coordinator will, within five (5)

business days, provide the complainant or his/her representative with a written acknowledgement

of the complaint.

29

The Title VI Coordinator will take reasonable steps to resolve the matter and respond to the

complaint within thirty (30) business days of receipt. The Title VI Coordinator will notify the

complainant in writing of the final decision and/or action recommended to be taken. The River to

Sea TPO’s Title VI Coordinator has ‘easy access’ to the TPO Executive Director and will immediately

report allegations of discrimination to the Executive Director.

If the complainant is dissatisfied with the River to Sea TPO’s final decision, the River to Sea Title VI

Coordinator shall forward the complaint, along with a record of its disposition, to the Florida

Department of Transportation (FDOT) Title VI Coordinator for further processing.

Should the complainant be unable or unwilling to complain to the River to Sea TPO, or if the

complainant is dissatisfied with the River to Sea TPO’s handling of a complaint, a written complaint

may be submitted directly to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Title VI

Coordinator.

The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Title VI Coordinator can be contacted at:

Jacqueline E. Paramore

Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Title VI Coordinator

605 Suwannee Street

Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450

850-414-4753

Jacqueline.Paramore@dot.state.fl.us

Complaints may also be submitted directly to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ will

ensure that the matter is assigned to the correct federal or state authority for processing.

The U.S. Department of Justice may be contacted at:

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division

Federal Coordination and Compliance Section, NWB

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530

Title VI Hotline: 1-888-TITLE-06 (1-888-848-5306) (Voice / TTY)

https://www.justice.gov/crt/fcs/TitleVI-Overview

30

RETALIATION

Retaliation is prohibited under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related federal and state

nondiscrimination authorities. It is the policy of the River to Sea TPO that persons filing a complaint

of discrimination should have the right to do so without interference, intimidation, coercion or fear

of reprisal. Anyone who feels he/she has been subjected to retaliation should report such incident

to the River to Sea TPO’s Title VI Coordinator.

The TPO Title VI Coordinator will maintain a log of all verbal and written complaints received by

the TPO. The log will include:

1. Name of Complainant

2. Basis of Complaint (i.e., race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, familial status

or retaliation)

3. Date of verbal or written complaint

4. Explanation of the actions the TPO has taken or proposed to resolve the issue raised in the

complaint

ADA/504 STATEMENT

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA),

and related federal and state laws and regulations forbid discrimination against those who have

disabilities. Furthermore, these laws require federal aid recipients and other government entities

to take affirmative steps to reasonably accommodate the disabled and ensure that their needs are

equitably represented in the transportation planning process.

The River to Sea TPO will make every effort to ensure that its facilities, programs, services and

activities are accessible to those with disabilities. The River to Sea TPO will also make every effort

to ensure that its advisory committees and public involvement activities include representation of

the disabled community and disability service groups.

The River to Sea TPO encourages the public to report any facility, program, service or activity that

appears inaccessible to the disabled. Furthermore, the River to Sea TPO will provide reasonable

accommodations to disabled individuals who wish to participate in public involvement events or

who require special assistance to access River to Sea TPO facilities, programs, services or activities.

Because providing reasonable accommodation may require outside assistance, organization or

31

resources, the River to Sea TPO asks that requests be made at least five (5) calendar days prior to

the need for accommodations.

The following notice is provided on all meeting agendas and notices:

Individuals covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 in need of accommodations for

this public meeting should contact the River to Sea TPO office, 2570 W. International Speedway

Blvd., Suite 100, Daytona Beach, Florida 32114-8145; (386) 226-0422, extension 20416, at least

five (5) working days prior to the meeting date.

Questions, concerns, comments or requests for accommodations should be made to:

River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization

ATTN: Pamela Blankenship, Title VI Coordinator

2570 W. International Speedway Boulevard, Suite 100

Daytona Beach, FL 32114

386.226.0422, ext. 20416

Fax: 386.226.0428

pblankenship@r2ctpo.org

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

In order to plan for efficient, effective, safe, equitable and reliable transportation systems, the

River to Sea TPO must solicit the input of the public. The TPO expends extensive staff and financial

resources in the furtherance of this goal and strongly encourages the participation of the entire

community. The TPO offers a number of volunteer roles for those wishing to become more

involved in the planning process. The TPO also holds a number of transportation meetings,

workshops and other events designed to gather public input on planning activities. In addition, the

TPO attends and participates in other community events to promote its services and improve its

name recognition among the public. The TPO is constantly seeking ways of measuring the

effectiveness of its public involvement.

For more information on the TPO’s public involvement and measures of effectiveness, the public

may view the TPO Public Participation Plan (PPP), on the River to Sea TPO’s website

(http://www.r2ctpo.org/resources/planning-documents) and at the TPO office. Persons wishing to

request special presentations by the TPO, volunteer for any of its activities or offer suggestions for

32

the improvement of TPO public involvement activities may contact:

River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization

ATTN: Pamela Blankenship, Title VI Coordinator

2570 W. International Speedway Boulevard, Suite 100

Daytona Beach, FL 32114

386.226.0422 ext. 20416

Fax: 386.226.0428

pblankenship@r2ctpo.org

DATA COLLECTION

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regulations require federal-aid recipients to collect racial,

ethnic and other similar demographic data on beneficiaries of those affected by TPO programs,

services and activities. The TPO accomplishes this through the use of Census data, American

Community Survey reports, Environmental Screening Tools (EST), driver and ridership surveys as

well as other methods. From time to time, the TPO may find it necessary to request voluntary

identification of certain racial, ethnic or other data from those who participate in its public

involvement events. This information assists the TPO with improving its targeted outreach and

measures of effectiveness. Self-identification of personal data to the TPO will always be voluntary

and anonymous. Moreover, the TPO will not release or otherwise use this data in any manner

inconsistent with the federal regulations.

ASSURANCES

Each year, the TPO must certify to FHWA and FDOT that its programs, services and activities are

being conducted in a nondiscriminatory manner. These certifications are termed ‘assurances’ and

serve two important purposes. First, they document the TPO’s commitment to nondiscrimination

and equitable service to its community. Second, they serve as a legally enforceable agreement by

which the TPO may be held liable for breach. The public may view the annual assurances on the

TPO website (www.r2ctpo.org) or by visiting the TPO offices.

33

TITLE VI PROGRAM REVIEW AND TRAINING

The TPO's Title VI Program will be reviewed on an annual basis by the Title VI Coordinator to

ensure compliance with Title VI (policies, regulations, procedures, etc.). Updates to the Title VI

Plan will be made as needed.

The TPO's Title VI Coordinator will provide comprehensive staff training on Title VI and Limited

English Proficiency (LEP) on an annual basis.

34

Rio al Mar Organización de Planificación Transporte

Titulo VI / Programa Antidiscriminatorio Querella de Discriminación

Nombre del querellante:

Dirección:

Número de teléfono: Dirección de correo electrónico:

Nombre, dirección, teléfono y relación (ej. amigo, abogado, pariente, etc.) del Representante del querellante:

Nombre y dirección de la Agencia, Institución, o Departamento que usted alega discrimino en su contra:

Nombre(s) del Individuo(s) Quien(es) Usted Allega Discrimino Contra Usted Si lo(s) Conoce:

Razón de la discriminación:

¨ Raza ¨ Color ̈ Origen Nacional ¨ Incapacidad/Impedimento Físico ¨ Edad ¨ Sexo ¨ Represalia ¨ Status de Ingreso ¨ Otro

Fecha de la alegada discriminación:

Favor de indicar el nombre (s) y número(s) de teléfono(s) de alguna persona(s) que el Rio al Mar Organización de Planificación Transporte puede comunicarse para información adicional que clarifique o respalde su alegación o alegaciones.

Favor de explicar tan claro como sea posible, como, porque, cuando y donde usted cree que fue discriminado. Incluya suficiente información acerca de los antecedentes según le sea posible, de los alegados actos de discrimen. Puede añadir paginas adicionales, si es necesario.

Firma del Querellante(s) o su Representante: Fecha:

35

River to Sea to Sea Transportation Planning Organization

Title VI / Nondiscrimination Program

Complaint of Discrimination

Complainant(s) Name: Complainant(s) Address:

Complainant(s) Phone Number: E-mail Address:

Complainant's Representative's Name, Address, Phone Number and Relationship (e.g. friend, attorney, parent, etc.):

Name and Address of Agency, Institution, or Department Whom You Allege Discriminated Against You:

Names of the Individual(s) Whom You Allege Discriminated Against You (If Known):

Discrimination Because of:

ÿ糎Race Ｚÿ糎Color Ｚÿ糎National Origin ÿ Sex Ｚÿ糎Age Ｚÿ糎Handicap/Disability ÿ糎Income Status Ｚÿ糎Retaliation ÿ糎Other

Date of Alleged Discrimination:

Please list the name(s) and phone number(s) of any person, if known, that the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization could contact for additional information to support or clarify your allegation(s).

Please explain as clearly as possible how, why, when and where you believe you were discriminated against. Include as much background information as possible about the alleged acts of discrimination. Additional pages may be attached if needed.

Complainant(s) or Complainant(s) Representative(s) Signature: Date of Signature:

36

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

IV. ACTION ITEMS B. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S

LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP) ACCESS PLAN

Background Information: The Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan addresses the TPO’s responsibilities as recipients of federal financial assistance as they relate to the needs of individuals with limited English language skills. The goal of the River to Sea TPO Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan is to ensure that the TPO recognizes the needs of limited English proficient (LEP) members of the community, implements a plan to communicate effectively and ensures reasonable access to our processes, information and decision-making. The River to Sea TPO’s Limited English Proficiency Plan has been updated to reflect updated Federal Highway Administration requirements. In addition, the demographic and socioeconomic data for the TPO's metropolitan planning area has been updated. The LEP Plan is provided for your review and recommended approval. A draft was provided for review in April. There have been no changes to the document as a result of the review.

ACTION REQUESTED: MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## ADOPTING THE R2CTPO’S LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP) PLAN

37

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

RESOLUTION 2017-##

RESOLUTION OF THE RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADOPTING THE LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY ACCESS (LEP) PLAN

_____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) is the duly designated and constituted body responsible for carrying out the urban transportation planning and programming process for Volusia County and portions of Flagler County inclusive of the cities of Flagler Beach, Beverly Beach, and portions of Palm Coast and Bunnell; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes 339.175; 23 U.S.C. 134; and 49 U.S.C. 5303 require that the urbanized area, as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, have a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the comprehensively planned development of the urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO has developed the Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan, whose purpose is to ensure that the River to Sea TPO recognizes the needs of limited English proficient (LEP) members of the community, implements a plan to communicate effectively and ensures reasonable access to our processes, information and decision-making, and WHEREAS, the Limited English Proficiency Access Plan has been provided for review by the general public, the River to Sea TPO’s Advisory Committees and the River to Sea TPO Board.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the River to Sea TPO that the: 1. River to Sea TPO Board and advisory committees have reviewed and adopted the

River to Sea TPO’s Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan; and the

2. River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization’s Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan is attached hereto as Attachment "A"; and the

4. Chairman of the TPO (or his designee) is hereby authorized and directed to

provide a copy of this resolution along with the adopted Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan to: a. the Florida Department of Transportation; b. the Federal Highway Administration, via the Florida Department of

Transportation; and the c. the Federal Transit Administration, via the Florida Department of

Transportation.

38

DONE AND RESOLVED at the regularly convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on

the 24th day of May 2017.

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

__________________________________________ CITY OF FLAGLER BEACH COMMISSIONER MARSHALL SHUPE

CHAIRMAN, RIVER TO SEA TPO CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution, adopted at a legally convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on May 24, 2017.

ATTEST: _______________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

39

River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization

Limited English Proficiency Access Plan

I. Introduction

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from discriminating against or otherwise excluding individuals on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any of their activities. It has been recognized that one form of discrimination occurs through an inability to communicate due to a limited proficiency in the English language. This limitation is often the result of an individual’s national origin. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order 13166 and various directives from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) require federal aid recipients to take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to programs, services and activities by those who do not speak English well.

To determine the extent to which LEP services are required and in which languages, the law requires the analysis of four factors:

1. The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered by the River to Sea TPO’s programs, services or activities;

2. The frequency with which LEP individuals come in contact with these programs, services or activities;

3. The nature and importance of the program, service, or activity to people’s lives; and 4. The resources available and the overall cost to the River to Sea TPO.

The goal of the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (R2CTPO) Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Access Plan is to ensure that the River to Sea TPO recognizes the needs of limited English proficient (LEP) members of the community, implements a plan to communicate effectively and ensures reasonable access to our processes, information and decision-making.

Background

On August 11, 2000, the President issued Executive Order 13166, entitled "Improving Access to Services by Persons with Limited English Proficiency,” 65 FR 50121 (August 16, 2000). On the same day, the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a Policy Guidance Document, entitled "Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – National Origin Discrimination Against Persons With Limited English Proficiency” (hereinafter referred to as "DOJ LEP Guidance"), reprinted at 65 FR 50123 (August 16, 2000). In addition, the U.S. Department of

40

Transportation (USDOT) issued a policy guidance document, titled “Policy Guidance Concerning Recipients’ Responsibilities to Limited English Proficient (LEP) Persons,” reprinted at 70 FR 74087, dated December 14, 2005.

Executive Order 13166 requires federal agencies to: (1) examine services provided, (2) identify specific needs necessary to provide meaningful access for Limited English Proficiency (LEP) persons, and (3) implement a system to provide meaningful access to such services. The DOJ LEP Guidance advises each federal department or agency to "take reasonable steps to ensure ‘meaningful’ access [to LEP individuals] to the information and services they provide." [DOJ LEP Guidance, 65 FR at 50124]. The DOJ LEP Guidance goes on to provide that:

What constitutes reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access will be contingent on a number of factors. Among the factors to be considered is the number or proportion of LEP persons in the eligible service population, the frequency with which LEP individuals come in contact with the program, the importance of the service provided by the program, and the resources available to the agency.

The DOJ LEP Guidance explains that the identification of "reasonable steps" to provide oral and written services in languages other than English is to be determined on a case-by-case basis through a balancing of all four factors. The DOJ LEP and USDOT Guidance focus principally on the obligation of federal departments and agencies extending federal financial assistance to clarify the long-standing legal obligation on the part of recipients of such assistance to address the language needs of their otherwise-eligible LEP beneficiaries. Executive Order 13166 applies this same obligation to programs and activities undertaken directly by a federal department or agency. Section 2 of the Executive Order directs each federal department or agency "to prepare a plan to improve access to . . . federally conducted programs and activities by eligible LEP persons . . . consistent with the standards set forth in the LEP Guidance . . .”

The River to Sea TPO's Limited English Proficiency Plan works in concert with its Public Participation Plan (PPP), which identifies specific tactics for outreach and involvement.

II. River to Sea TPO Four-Factor Analysis

To determine the extent to which LEP services are required and in which languages, the law requires the analysis of four factors. The following sections address each of these factors with respect to the River to Sea TPO planning area.

Factor 1: Review of LEP Populations Understanding the needs of the community begins with identifying the number of Limited English Proficiency (LEP) persons eligible to be served, likely to be served or likely to be encountered by the River to Sea TPO through its programs, services or activities. In an effort to determine potential LEP needs within the River to Sea TPO planning area, TPO staff reviewed the data available through the U.S. Census Bureau American Fact Finder for the period of 2011 through 2015. Data collected for Volusia County indicated that 4.3% of households speak English “less than very well.” A further breakdown of the data showed that 3.1% speak Spanish as the primary language. Other languages (other than

41

Spanish) spoken in households that speak English “less than very well” include Indo-European (.9 0.7%), Asian and Pacific Islander (0.4%) and Other (0.2%) (see Table 1). This information led staff to review the Spanish speaking LEP group to identify whether this population was concentrated into specific communities.

Table 1: The Top Languages Spoken at Home in Volusia County

Table 1: The Top Five Languages Spoken at Home in Volusia County (US Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey)

Population 5 years and older

Number of LEP Persons

Percent of Population over 5 years old that are LEP

LEP Persons who speak Spanish

LEP Persons who speak Indo-European Languages

LEP Persons who speak Asian and Pacific Islander Languages

LEP Persons who speak Other Languages

479,923 20,815 4.3% 3.01% 0.7% 0.4% 0.2%

After reviewing a breakdown of Volusia County Spanish LEP populations by city, (2011-2015 American Community Survey Five-Year Estimates), it became clear that much of the data was not statistically significant when viewed on a local level; however, the data did appear to indicate a slight concentration of Spanish speaking LEP persons in the city of Deltona (9.3%) and the town of Pierson (23.0%). Because the River to Sea TPO realizes that statistical data can be outdated or inaccurate, TPO staff worked with the local public transit provider, Votran, to confirm estimates of LEP populations. Under the Title VI program, Spanish was reported to be the prevalent LEP language and the geographic locations of those populations were consistent with the TPO analysis. Table 2: The Top Languages Spoken at Home in Flagler County

Table 2: The Top Five Languages Spoken at Home in Flagler County (US Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey)

Population 5 years and older

Number of LEP Persons

Percent of Population over 5 years old that are LEP

LEP Persons who speak Spanish

LEP Persons who speak Indo-European Languages

LEP Persons who speak Asian and Pacific Islander Languages

LEP Persons who speak Other Languages

96,414 6,465 6.7% 2.76 % 6.7% 1.6% 0.3%

Flagler County does not have a substantial population of people who rely solely on a language other than English; however, as Table 2 (above) shows, an estimated 6.7% of the population 5 years and over speak English “less than very well.” While a sizeable portion of that group is comprised of Spanish speakers (2.76%), 6.7% are those who speak Indo-European languages. This family of languages (other than Spanish) includes Russian, along with other major language groups such as Irish, Polish, French, German, Portuguese and Italian. Anecdotally, this has been attributed to a significant Russian-speaking population in Flagler County (See Table 2).

42

Factor 2: Assessing Frequency of Contact with LEP Persons

The results of the Census data indicate that Spanish is the most prevalent language spoken by the LEP population in the area covered by the River to Sea TPO. To date, the TPO has not received any requests for translation or interpretation of its programs, services or activities into Spanish or any other language. The TPO has translated and distributed a Spanish language version of the “Tell the TPO” transportation survey and four were returned to the TPO. The TPO has not, for the most part, had any LEP attendees at public events.

Factor 3: Assessing the Importance of TPO Programs

All of the River to Sea TPO programs are important; however, those related to safety, public transit, right-of-way, the environment, nondiscrimination and public involvement are among the most important. The TPO must ensure that all segments of the population, including LEP persons, have been involved or have had the opportunity to be involved in the transportation planning process to be consistent with the goal of the Federal Environmental Justice Program and Policy.

Factor 4: Determining Available Resources

When planning any activity, it is imperative that an organization assess the resources available to conduct the activity in a way that is meaningful and balances those efforts with the overall cost to the organization. Given the size of the Spanish LEP population in the River to Sea TPO planning area and current financial constraints, full language translations of plan documents are not considered warranted or cost feasible at this time; however, the River to Sea TPO is fortunate to house within its jurisdiction a number of institutions of higher education and military facilities, both of which have extensive language services. The TPO will continue to evaluate its programs, services and activities to ensure that persons who may be LEP are always provided with meaningful access.

The analyses of these four factors suggest that, although the costs for providing access are reasonable, the need is limited and extensive LEP services are not required at this time. Nevertheless, the River to Sea TPO believes that Spanish language assistance is necessary for certain activities in order to provide broad access by members of the public.

III. Language Access Implementation Plan and Procedures

A limited English proficiency plan helps management and staff members understand their roles and responsibilities with respect to overcoming language barriers for LEP individuals. It is a management roadmap that outlines how the agency defines tasks, assigns responsibilities and allocates the resources necessary to come into, or maintain compliance with, language access requirements. It describes how the agency will meet the service delivery standards delineated in the policy directives, provide notice of language assistance services, provide staff training and conduct ongoing monitoring and evaluation. The following sections outline the activities that are being undertaken by the River to Sea TPO to comply with LEP needs.

43

Administer LEP services by:

1. Assigning a staff member to oversee the LEP program; this includes the development and implementation of this plan and annually examining the LEP plan to ensure that it remains reflective of the community’s needs.

2. Documenting the number and type of contacts by LEP persons and activities and events requiring LEP assistance.

3. Ensuring that the River to Sea TPO staff is familiar with the requirements and resources for LEP persons.

Provide verbal translation as follows:

1. The Census Bureau’s “I Speak” language cards are available at the TPO's reception desk and TPO staff is able to identify language needs in order to match them with available services.

2. A list of support contacts who competently speak Spanish and who are willing to provide translation and/or interpretation services is maintained. The resource list has been distributed to TPO staff.

3. Agreements have been made with local agencies, colleges, universities and community partners to provide oral and written LEP services with reasonable notification.

4. Events and activities that may require a translator to ensure meaningful access by LEP persons have been identified and will be periodically updated.

Provide written translation as follows:

1. Meeting notifications are provided in English and Spanish, where appropriate.

2. Outreach documents include a notice that language services are available free of charge in a language LEP persons can understand: “Persons who require translation services, which are provided at no cost, should contact the River to Sea TPO at (386) 226-0422 or by email at PBlankenship@r2ctpo.org at least five (5) business days prior to the event.”

3. Spanish language outreach materials from other organizations including federal, state and local transportation agencies are provided whenever possible.

4. Documents that will be provided in Spanish language format have been, and will continue to be, identified.

LEP Services Required

Given the four-factor analysis, the River to Sea TPO has identified the following documents for translation into Spanish language format:

· The Walk and Ride Bicycle & Pedestrian Safety Video · The Tell the TPO Survey, which is issued biannually · Spanish, as well as other language formats, have been made available on the TPO website using

Google Translate

44

The TPO has also identified the following events and activities that will require a Spanish language translator:

· Univision Telefutura Health Fair · Public outreach events in Northwest Volusia

For questions or concerns regarding the River to Sea TPO’s commitment to nondiscrimination or to request LEP services, contact Pamela Blankenship, Title VI Coordinator, at (386) 226-0422 ext. 20416 or by email at PBlankenship@r2ctpo.org.

45

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

IV. ACTION ITEMS C. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## AMENDING THE FY 2016/17

TO 2020/21 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) Background Information: This proposed TIP amendment provides $124,623 in additional funds for construction of FM# 4355321 Big Tree Road Shared Use Path pursuant to a request by the City of South Daytona. It also adds $358,546 for construction of FM# 4355951 Doyle Road Paved Shoulders from Lush Ln to Courtland Blvd as requested by Volusia County. Both requests were reviewed by the advisory committees and approved by the TPO Board in April. The proposed amendment is more fully described in the enclosed Resolution 2017-## and Attachment "A”. ACTION REQUESTED: MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## AMENDING THE FY 2016/17 TO 2020/21 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

46

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

RESOLUTION 2017-##

RESOLUTION OF THE RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION AMENDING THE FY 2016/17 TO FY 2020/21

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) is the duly designated and constituted body responsible for carrying out the urban transportation planning and programming process for Volusia County and portions of Flagler County inclusive of the cities of Flagler Beach, Beverly Beach and portions of Palm Coast and Bunnell; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes 339.175; 23 U.S.C. 134; and 49 U.S.C. 5303 require that the urbanized area, as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, have a continuing, cooperative and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the comprehensively planned development of the urbanized area; and

WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO shall annually endorse and amend as appropriate, the plans and programs required by 23 C.F.R. 450.300 through 450.324, among which is the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO’s adopted TIP is required to be consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation’s adopted Five-Year Work Program; and

WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation has provided additional information to the River to Sea TPO regarding the FDOT adopted Five-Year Work Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the River to Sea TPO that the:

1. River to Sea TPO’s FY 2016/17 to FY 2020/21 TIP is hereby amended as shown in Attachment "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and the

2. Chairman of the River to Sea TPO (or his designee) is hereby authorized and

directed to submit the FY 2016/17 to FY 2020/21 TIP as amended to the: a. Florida Department of Transportation; b. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (through the Florida Department of

Transportation); and the c. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (through the Florida

Department of Transportation).

47

DONE AND RESOLVED at the regularly convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on the 24th day of May 2017.

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

______________________________________ FLAGLER BEACH COMMISSIONER MARSHALL SHUPE

CHAIRMAN, RIVER TO SEA TPO CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution, adopted at a legally convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on May 24, 2017. ATTEST: ________________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

48

Attachment "A"

Resolution 2017-##

Amending the

FY 2016/17 - FY 2020/21

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

Proposed for adoption May 24, 2017

49

River to Sea TPO Transportation Improvement Program - FY 2016/17 - 2020/21

[Note: Underlined type indicates an addition; struck-through type indicates a deletion.] Pg 2 of 3

4355321 Big Tree Road Shared Use Path Non-SIS

Work Summary: BIKE PATH/TRAIL From:

James Street

To:

SR 5A (Nova Rd)

Lead Agency: City of South Daytona Length:

Phase Fund Source

2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total

PE LF 19,700 0 0 0 0 19,700

CEI LF 50,000 47,268

0 0 0 0 50,000 47,268

CEI SU ACSU 27,500 0 0 0 0 27,500

CST SU ACSU 450,000 607,161

0 0 0 0 450,000 607,161

CST LF 50,000 494

0 0 0 0 50,000 494

Total 577,500 702,123

0 0 0 0 577,500 702,123

Prior Cost < 2016/17: 0

Future Cost > 2020/21: 0

Total Project Cost: 577,500 702,123

Project Description: LAP agreement with the City of South Daytona to construct a 10' wide shared use path along Big Tree Road from James Street to SR 5A (Nova Road). (Reference 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, pgs 10, 11, 85, table 31 on pg 73.)

50

River to Sea TPO Transportation Improvement Program - FY 2016/17 - 2020/21

[Note: Underlined type indicates an addition; struck-through type indicates a deletion.] Pg 3 of 3

4355951 Doyle Road Paved Shoulders from Lush Ln to Courtland Blvd Non-SIS

Work Summary: PAVED SHOULDERS From:

Lush Lane

To:

Lead Agency: Volusia County Length: 0.795 mile

Phase Fund

Source 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total

PE LF 98,662 0 0 0 0 98,662 CEI LF 0 101,562 0 0 0 101,562

CEI SU 0 5,000 0 0 0 5,000

CST ACSU 0 500,000 0 0 0 500,000

CST SU 0 677,074 535,620

0 0 0 677,074 535,620

Total 98,662 783,636 1,142,182

0 0 0 882,298 1,240,844

Prior Cost < 2016/17: 0

Future Cost > 2020/21: 0

Total Project Cost: 1,240,844

Project Description: LAP agreement with Volusia County to add paved shoulders on Doyle Road between Lush Lane and Courtland Boulevard. The TPO's support for traffic operations, intelligent transportation systems (ITS), and safety projects is expressed on page 65, table 31 on page 73 of the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan.

51

SUMMARY SHEET CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

IV. ACTION ITEMS

D. REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## SUPPORTING UPDATES TO THE FLORIDA GREENWAYS AND TRAIL SYSTEM (FGTS) PLAN AND THE OPPORTUNITY AND PRIORITY MAPS

Background Information:

The Florida Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT) is seeking input for the update of the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) Plan and the Opportunity and Priority Maps. The FGTS Plan and maps are being updated in 2016 through 2017 through a detailed schedule. Updates are requested on or before June 30, 2017. The updated FGTS Plan and maps will guide implementation of the connected statewide trail system from 2018 through 2022.

Resolution 2017-## requests the following: · designating the Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor and extending it

north to the River to Sea TPO boundary; · designating the Bunnell to Ormond Connector a Land Trail Priority Corridor and extending it

north to the Flagler/St. Johns County line; · designating the SR 40 Trail Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor; and· designating the Cross Volusia Trail Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor.

A map depicting these corridors is included in the agenda. A draft of this proposal was presented in April.

ACTION REQUESTED:

MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2017-## SUPPORTING UPDATES TO THE FLORIDA GREENWAYS AND TRAIL SYSTEM (FGTS) PLAN AND THE OPPORTUNITY AND PRIORITY MAPS

52

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

RESOLUTION 2017-##

RESOLUTION OF THE RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION SUPPORTING UPDATES TO THE FLORIDA GREENWAYS AND TRAILS SYSTEM (FGTS) PLAN

AND THE OPPORTUNITY AND PRIORITY MAPS _____________________________________________________________________________________

WHEREAS, the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) is the duly designated and constituted body responsible for carrying out the urban transportation planning and programming process for Volusia County and portions of Flagler County inclusive of the cities of Flagler Beach, Beverly Beach, and portions of Palm Coast and Bunnell; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes 339.175; 23 U.S.C. 134; and 49 U.S.C. 5303 require that the urbanized area, as a condition to the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, have a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the comprehensively planned development of the urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) Plan establishes the vision for implementing a connected statewide system of greenways and trails for recreation, conservation, alternative transportation, healthy lifestyles, a vibrant economy, a high quality of life; and WHEREAS, the FGTS Plan and Priority Maps were last updated in 2012 and the Opportunity Maps updated in 2015; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT) is seeking input to update the FGTS Plan and the Opportunity and Priority Maps; and

WHEREAS, the updated FGTS Plan and the Opportunity and Priority Maps will guide

implementation of the connected statewide trail system from 2018 through 2022; and WHEREAS, the River to Sea TPO is a strong proponent of the provision of bicycle and

pedestrian facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the River to Sea TPO that the:

1. River to Sea TPO supports updates to the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) Plan and the Opportunity and Priority Maps by designating the Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor and extending it north to the River to Sea TPO boundary; and

2. Designating the Bunnell to Ormond Connector a Land Trail Priority Corridor and extending it north to the Flagler/St. Johns County Line; and

3. Designating the State Road 40 Trail Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor; and

53

4. Designating the Cross Volusia Trail Corridor a Land Trail Priority Corridor; and the

5. Chairman of the River to Sea TPO (or his designee) is hereby authorized and directed to submit this resolution to the following:

a. Florida Department of Transportation; b. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (through the Florida Department of

Transportation); c. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (through the Florida Department of

Transportation); d. Florida Greenways and Trails Council; e. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council (ECFRPC); f. Members of the Central Florida MPO Alliance; and g. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Office of Greenways

and Trails (OGT);

DONE AND RESOLVED at the regular meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on the 24TH day of May, 2017.

RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

_______________________________________ FLAGLER BEACH COMMISSIONER MARSHALL SHUPE

CHAIRMAN, RIVER TO SEA TPO CERTIFICATE: The undersigned duly qualified and acting Recording Secretary of the River to Sea TPO certified that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution, adopted at a legally convened meeting of the River to Sea TPO held on May 24, 2017. ATTEST: _____________________________________ DEBBIE STEWART, RECORDING SECRETARY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

54

0 10 20 30 405Miles

µM A P I N D E XM A P I N D E X

NortheastNortheastRegionRegion

¹L A N D T R A I LL A N D T R A I L

O P P O R T U N I T I E SO P P O R T U N I T I E S

Map Date: 9/29/16

*LAND TRAIL OPPORTUNITY CORRIDORS

* The different colors of the Land Trails represent the beginning and ending points of individual corridors.

LAND TRAIL PRIORITY CORRIDORS

55

East Coast Greenway-Flagler Corridor

East Coast Greenway-Volusia Corridor

East Central Regional Rail Trail - ECG Corridor

Lehigh Greenway Rail Trail Corridor

State Road 40 Trail Corridor

US 17 Trail Corridor

Cross Volusia Trail Corridor

Bunnell to Ormond Connector

Palm Coast to Bulow Corridor

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN,Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

±

0 5 10 15 202.5Miles

Florida Greenways & Trails System (FGTS) Plan

LegendLand Trail Priority CorridorsLand Trail Opportunity CorridorsProposed Land Trail Priority Corridors56

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS A. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE TPO’S DRAFT PRIORITY PROJECT LISTS

Background Information: The River to Sea TPO develops seven lists of priority projects (LOPP), each representing a different category of projects. Once adopted, the lists are transmitted to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) district office for use in allocating transportation funds to the area. Two of the priority project lists – the Strategic Intermodal System projects (SIS); Regionally Significant, and Non-SIS Roadway projects list – are generally updated following the update or revision of the TPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. Four additional lists – the Traffic Operations, Safety, and Local Initiatives (traffic operations-focused) projects; Bicycle/Pedestrian and Local Initiatives (bicycle/pedestrian-focused) projects; Regional Trails projects; and Transportation Planning studies – are updated annually with the "call for projects". Project applications submitted to the TPO are reviewed and ranked based upon the criteria developed through the committee process and approved by the River to Sea TPO Board. For Transit projects, the TPO generally defers to Votran and Flagler County Public Transportation to determine project priorities. The draft priority project lists reflect changes to the status of projects already on the lists (e.g., completed phase(s), updated cost estimates, etc.). The draft Traffic Operations, Safety, and Local Initiatives Project List will be provided under separate cover. The Transportation Planning Studies list includes new projects received through the "call for projects". These have been reviewed and scored by the TIP Subcommittee and added in ranked order according to the project scores. The draft Bicycle/Pedestrian and Local Initiatives (bicycle/pedestrian-focused) project list and the Regional Trails project list will be reviewed by the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee and are provided herein to the CAC and TCC for information purposes only. The draft List of Priority Projects are provided for your review. A marked up version is also provided to reflect changes from the 2016 Lists of Priority Projects. ACTION REQUESTED:

NO ACTION REQUIRED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE

57

DRAF

TPg 1 

River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization

2017 LIST OF PRIORITY PROJECTS   Page 

STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM (SIS) PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 

REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT, NON‐SIS ROADWAY PROJECTS  ............................................................................................................................................... 3 

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, SAFETY, AND LOCAL INITIATIVES PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................. 6 

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN AND B/P LOCAL INITIATIVES PROJECTS ......................................................................................................................................... 13 

TRANSIT PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 20 

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STUDIES ............................................................................................................................................................................ 21 

58

DRAF

TPg 2 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Projects DRAFT 5/9/17 

Priority Rank1  FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits Project Type  Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

1  4084642  P12s‐202‐01 

I‐4 widening to 10 Lanes (1‐4 Beyond the Ultimate) 

Volusia/Seminole county line to 1/2 mile east of SR 472

widening PE ‐ $1,228,818‐FY 16/17; ENV ‐ $150,270 ‐ FY 17/18

ROW ‐ $46.355 million;CST ‐ $372.07 million (all costs are 2014)

$424.8 million  To be funded as a public‐private partnership using tolled lanes 

      SR 472 ‐ widen from 4 lanes to 6 

Graves Av to Kentucky/MLK Blvd 

widening CST ‐ $40.48 million, $40.48 million  To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project; also on Regionally‐Significant, Non‐SIS List 

      Saxon Blvd Ramp/Roadway

I‐4 to Normandy Blvd

CST ‐ $35.38 million $35.38 million  To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project 

      Rhode Island Extension Veterans Memorial Pkwy to Normandy Blvd

CST ‐ $34.87 million $34.87 million  To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project 

2  4102511  P10s‐205‐01 

SR 15 (US 17) ‐ widen to 4 lanes 

Ponce de Leon Blvd to SR 40 

widening  PE ‐  $455,410 ‐ FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $ 13,691,472  ‐ FY 16/17 through FY 20/21; RRU ‐ $3,000,000 ‐ FY 20/21; CST ‐ $50,186,043 ‐ FY 20/21 

  $76.7million  FULLY‐FUNDED 

3  4289471  P11s‐201‐01 

SR 40 ‐ widen to 6 lanes Williamson to Breakaway Tr 

widening PE ‐ $2.13 million, ENV ‐$0.13, ROW ‐ $7.43 million, CST ‐ $22.99 million,  (all costs are 2014)

$33 .26 million (2014) 

Also on Regionally‐Significant, Non‐SIS List 

4  2408371  P10s‐206‐01 

SR 40  ‐ widen to 4 lanes Cone Rd to SR 11 widening ROW ‐ $2.3 million,CST ‐ $41.5  million (all costs are 2015)

$50.36 million   

5  2408361  P10s‐207‐01 

SR 40 ‐ widen to 4 lanes SR 11 to SR 15 (US 17) 

widening ENV ‐ $4,500,000 ‐ FY 16/17ROW ‐ $5,246,000 ‐ FY 21/22

CST ‐ $35.0million; (all costs are2017) 

$48.5 million (2017) 

 

6      SR 100 ‐ widen to 6 lanes  

Old Kings Rd to Belle Terre Pkwy  

widening  ROW ‐ $3.17 million; CST ‐ $31.70 million 

$34.87 million (2015) 

Also on Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Projects List 

                                                            1 Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program.  

59

DRAF

T

 

Pg 3 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Projects  DRAFT 5/9/17 

Priority Rank2 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits  Project Type

Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

1      US 1 intersections (from the US 1 AIS) 

  intersection improvements

‐ ‐  ‐ ‐     

4371211    SR 5 (US 1) at Park Av SR 5 (US 1) at Park Av ‐ ‐ PE‐ $372,000 ‐FY 19/20 

CST TBD  Southbound right turn lane added as part of FM# 4268891, US 1 Median Modifications); PE for signal system upgrade to improve intersection operations is programmed in FY 19/20 

2409925  P10r‐210‐05 

SR 5 (US 1) at Canal St Intersection Improvements 

SR 5 (US 1) at Canal St ‐ ‐ PE ‐ $107,342 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $5,718 – FY 16/17; RRU ‐ $605,264 – FY CST ‐ $4,887,349‐ FY 18/19

‐ ‐ 7,345,128  FULLY‐FUNDED 

2409927  P10r‐210‐08 

SR 5 (US 1) at Reed Canal Rd Intersection Improvements 

SR 5 (US 1) at Reed Canal Rd ‐ ‐ PE ‐ $7,793 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $15,152 – FY 16/17; CST ‐ $1,279,781‐ FY 16/17 through FY 17/18

‐ ‐ $2,485,713  FULLY‐FUNDED 

2409928  P10r‐210‐06 

SR 5 (US 1) at Big Tree Rd Intersection Improvements 

SR 5 (US 1) at Big Tree Rd Intersection 

‐ ‐ PE ‐ $10,389 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $17,171 – FY 16/17; CST ‐ $635,530 ‐ FY 17/18

‐ ‐ $1,237,336  FULLY‐FUNDED 

2  4081781  P10r‐212‐01 

SR 483 (Clyde Morris Blvd) widen to 6 lanes 

SR 400 (Beville Rd) to SR 600 (US 92 ‐ International Speedway Blvd) 

widening PE ‐ $13,934 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $24,673,760 ‐ FY 17/18 through FY 21/22

CST ‐ $29.1million (2017) 

$70.1  CST cost matches CFLRoads info last updated 2017 

                                                            2 Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program. 

60

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects – Continued…  

Pg 4 

Priority Rank2 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits  Project Type

Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

3  4159641  P14r‐202‐01 

Old Kings Rd widen from 2 lanes to 4 

Palm Coast Pkwy to Forest Grove Dr 

widening CST ‐ $13,250,000 (2014); CEI ‐ $1,600,000 (2014)

$17,260,000  Cost estimates per Table 1, Palm Coast FY 14/15 ‐ FY 2018/19 FDOT 5‐Yr Work Program Project Priorities 

4  ‐ ‐  P11r‐208‐01 

SR 44 – Miscellaneous upgrades to improve access to DeLand SunRail 

between SR 15A and SunRail Station 

misc. upgrades to improve access to the SunRail station

‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $1.74,CST ‐ $17.36 

$19,100,000  SR 44 corridor study completed  

5  4226271  P11R‐209‐01 

US 92 – widen from 4 to 6 lanes 

I‐4 EB Ramps to SR 600 (US 92) to CR 415 (Tomoka Farms Rd) 

widening PE ‐ $185,655 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $9,863,891‐ FY 18/19 through FY 21/22; ENV ‐ $1,500,000 – FY 16/17

CST ‐ $23.0 million (2017) 

$37.5  CST cost estimate from CFLRoads (2017) 

6  4355611  P14r‐203‐01 

Old Kings Road Extension ‐Phase II 

Matanzas Woods Pkwy to Old Kings Rd 

new road construction  CST ‐ $3,782,318 ‐ 

FY 18/19

‐ ‐ $5,600,000  FULLY‐FUNDED 

7  4271181 and 

4271182 

P14r‐204‐01 

Commerce Pkwy Connector Road – new 2 lane roadway 

SR 100 to US 1 new road construction 

CST ‐ $4,073,000 (2015) 

$5,372,000  $694,000 remaining in LAP to apply toward CST; 60% plans w/ revised cost estimate expected June 2015 

8  4336751  P14r‐205‐01 

Matanzas Woods Pkwy – (west) – widen to 4 lanes 

US 1 to I‐95 southbound ramps  widening PE ‐ $1,903,000 ‐FY 18/19 

ROW ‐ $183,000; ENV ‐ $28,000; CST ‐ $12,653,000; CEI ‐ $1,265,000

$16,032,000  Cost estimates per Table 1, Palm Coast FY 14/15 ‐ FY 18/19 FDOT 5‐Yr Work Program Project Priorities 

9      SR 600/SR15 (US 17/92) –Emerging SIS 

SR 472 to SR 15A (Taylor Rd) not yet determined

‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3,000,000CST ‐ $27,000,000

$30,000,000   

10      LPGA Blvd  ‐ widen to 3 lanes SR 5A (Nova Rd) to SR 5/US 1 widening ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3,500,000CST ‐ $9,000,000

$12,500,000   

11      Howland Blvd ‐ widen to 4lanes 

Providence Blvd to Elkcam Blvd  widening ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $2,500,000CST ‐ $11,820,000

$14,320,000   

12      North Entrance DeLand Airport  (Industrial Park) 

Industrial Park to SR 11  new road ‐ ‐ CST ‐ $970,000 $970,000   

61

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects – Continued…  

Pg 5 

Priority Rank2 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits  Project Type

Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

13  4289471    SR 40 ‐ widen to 6 lanes Williamson Blvd to Breakaway Trails 

widening PD&E ‐ $5,881 – FY 16/17 

PE ‐ $2.13 million, ENV ‐ $0.13, ROW ‐ $7.43 million, CST ‐ $22.99 million, 

  Also on SIS Projects List 

14      SR 100 – widen to 6 lanes Old Kings Rd to Belle Terre Pkwy

widening ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3.17 millionCST ‐ $31.70 million

$34,870,000  Also on SIS Projects List 

15      SR 442 Extension SR 442 to SR 415 PD&E for new road

‐ ‐ PD&E ‐ $10,000,000 $10,000,000   

Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program. 

62

DRAF

T

 

Pg 13 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

DRAFT 5/9/17 

Tier "A" – Projects with One or More Phases Funded 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits

Project Type

Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)

Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost 

Local Match %  Comments 

‐‐  4354871  P13w‐103‐01  Flagler Av Sidewalk  12th St to Park Av  Sidewalk  Edgewater  PE ‐ $4,312 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $416,830 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $457,945  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4355351  P11p‐113‐01  Forrest Hills Connector 

Old Tomoka Rd to Scottdale Dr 

Trail  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $1,281 ‐ FY 2016/17; CST ‐ $589,288 FY 17/18 

‐‐  $645,692  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4355391  P13w‐110‐01  N. Spruce Creek Rd Sidewalk 

Nova Rd to Angelina Ct  

Sidewalk  Port Orange 

PE ‐ $74,355 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $404,595 FY 18/19 

‐‐  $478,158  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4398661  P14‐104‐01  Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail

Wilder Bv to Shady Place 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE – 101,000  ‐ FY 16/17CST ‐ 1$400,000 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $525,517  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED  

‐‐  4364341  P14n‐601‐01  Seminole/Volusia Gap 

Wayside Park to (Seminole County) Spring to Spring Trail (Volusia County) 

Trail  Volusia County 

CST ‐ $2,572,266 ‐ FY 16/17$25,675 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $2,099,356  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED  

‐‐  4106761  P14n‐605‐01  Black Bear Scenic Trail 

SR 35 (Marion County) to US 17 (Volusia County) 

Trail  Volusia County 

PD&E ‐ $4,620 ‐ FY 16/17  PE, CST  TBD  0%   

‐‐  4355381  P13p‐109‐01  W. French Av Shared Use Path 

Spring to Spring Trail to Valentine Park 

Trail  Orange City PE ‐ $19,299 ‐ FY 16/17  ROW; CST  TBD  10%   

‐‐  4302172  P10p‐155‐01  Alabama Av Trail   Minnesota Av to US 92 

Trail  DeLand  CST ‐ $1,344,112 ‐ FY 19/20   ‐‐  $1,344,112  0%   

‐‐  4390371  P15p‐101‐01  Beville Rd Shared Use Path 

Williamson Bv to Clyde Morris Bv 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $131,800 ‐ FY 16/17CST ‐ 1$964,030 ‐ FY 2020/21 

‐‐  $1,095,830  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED  

‐‐  4154348  P14e‐160‐01  East Central Regional Rail Trail (ECRRT) 

Guise Rd to Gobbler’s Lodge Rd

Trail  Volusia County 

CST ‐ $$5,003,500 ‐ FY 17/18  ‐‐  $5,003,500  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED  

‐‐  4390391  P10e‐121‐01  Spring to Spring Trail  Detroit Terrace to US 17‐92 

Trail  Volusia County 

PE ‐ $299,271 ‐ FY 16/17  ROW, CST  TBD  10%     

63

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 14 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits

Project Type

Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)

Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost 

Local Match %  Comments 

‐‐  4102511  P10e‐122‐01  US 17 Trail  W. Baxter St to SR 40 

Trail  Volusia County 

PE, ROW,CST  ‐‐  TBD  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED  Included in roadway widening project 

‐‐  4398741    Spring to Spring Trail  Lake Beresford Park to Grand Av 

Trail  Volusia County 

PE ‐ $751,000 ‐ FY 16/17  CST  TBD  0%  SUN Trail 

‐‐  4390571    Nova Rd Trail  Bellevue Av to South St 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $298,116 ‐ FY FY 16/17  ‐‐  $298,116  10%   

‐‐  4398691    Halifax River Greenway Trail 

Marina Point Dr to Orange Av 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $101,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $450,000 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $551,000  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED SUN Trail 

‐‐  4399711    Freemont Av Sidewalk 

Niles St to US 1  Sidewalk  Daytona Beach 

CST (RR Xing Only)  ‐ $350,000 – FY 16/17 

PE, CST for sidewalk segments 

     

‐‐  4398771    US 17 Trail  Washington Av to Palmetto Av 

Trail  Pierson  PE ‐ $301,000 ‐ FY 17/18  ‐‐  $1,424,240  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED  SUN Trail 

‐‐  4398651    Riverwalk Shared Use Path 

US 1 from Canal St to Beville Rd 

Trail  Port Orange 

PD&E Study ‐ $1,510,000; PE ‐ $4,000,000 – FY 18/19 

CST  $5,510,000  0%  SUN Trail 

‐‐  4408481    Deltona Lakes/Spirit Elem Sidewalks 

[multiple limits]  Sidewalk  Deltona  PE ‐ $15,901 ‐  FY 17/18  CST  TBD  10%   

‐‐  4391951    Spring to Spring Connector Trail 

Spring to Spring Trail to US 17‐92 

Trail  DeBary  PE ‐ $25,000 ‐  FY 16/17; CST ‐ $225,000 ‐  FY 18/19 

‐‐  $250,000  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED Coast to Coast Trail 

‐‐  4398681    Halifax River Greenway Trail 

Bellevue to Marina Point Dr 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $66,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $450,000 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $516,000  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED  SUN Trail 

‐‐  4408521    Tomoka Elementary Connector Sidewalk 

Main Trail to Granada Bv 

Sidewalk  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $28,400 ‐ FY 17/18  CST  TBD  10%   

‐‐  4408531    Williamson Bv/Hand Av Pedestrian Improvements 

Hand Av to Regal Theater Driveway 

Sidewalk  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $28,400  CST  TBD  10%   

64

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 15 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits

Project Type

Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)

Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost 

Local Match %  Comments 

‐‐  4409061    Navy Canal Trail  Museum Bv to Clyde Morris Bv 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $48,500; CST ‐ $250,570  ‐‐  $299,070  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4409411    Tomoka State Park Trail 

Sanchez Park to Tomoka State Park 

Trail  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $87,000  CST  TBD  10%   

‐‐  4408541    Lakeview Bv Trail  Matanzas Parkway to London Dr 

Trail  Palm Coast  CST ‐ $563,771  ‐‐  $563,771  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

65

DRAF

T

 

Pg 16 

Tier "B" – Projects Ready for Funding 

Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project

#  Project Name  Project Limits Project Type  Sponsor 

Needed Phase(s) 

Estimated Total Project 

Cost Local 

Match % Year 

Submitted Project Score  Comments 

1  P15w‐101‐01 

N. Orange/E. Graves Av Sidewalks  French Av to University Av/Thorpe Av to Leavitt Av 

Sidewalk Orange City 

PE ‐ $56,587; CST ‐ $185,665 (2015) 

$241,952  10%  2015  87  Protected Status 

2    Providence Bv Shared Use Path  Spring to Spring Trail to Alexander Dr and Tivoli Dr to Joyner Dr  

Trail  Deltona  PE ‐ $284,256; CST ‐ $1,421,281 (2017) 

$1,918,729  10%  2017  90.25   

3    East ISB Beachside Corridor Improvement Plan  US 92 Bridge to SR A1A 

Sidewalk Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $750,000; ROW ‐ $20,000,000; CST ‐ $6,000,000 (2017) 

$27,500,000  10%  2017  85.75   

4    Coast to Coast Trail Wayfinding Signage Improvements 

Lake Monroe Park to Rotary Park 

Signage  Volusia County 

PE/CST ‐ $150,000 (2017)

$150,000  10%  2017  82   

5    W. French Av Sidewalk and Bike Lane  N. Carpenter Av to Valentine Park 

Sidewalk and Bike Lane 

Orange City 

CST ‐ $579,083 (2017) 

CST $579,083 10%  2017  76.75  This project replaces FM #4354991. 

6    Center Av, Phase 1 Sidewalk  LPGA Bv to Flomich St 

Sidewalk Holly Hill  PE ‐ $207,208; CST ‐ $664,026 (2017) 

$937,667  10%  2017  76   

7    Ormond Beach Downtown Crosswalk RRFB  Southside of SR 40 to Northside of SR 40 

RRFB  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $10,000; CST ‐ $36,750 (2017) 

$52,750  0%  2017  75.25   

8  P14w‐103‐01 

Flomich St Sidewalk  Nova Rd to Decatur St  

Sidewalk Holly Hill  PE ‐ $87,110 ROW ‐ $79,050 CST ‐ $340,729 (2016) 

$506,889  10%  2014  75   

9  P11e‐126‐01 

SR A1A National Scenic & Historic Coastal Byway Beautification, Phase 1 

N. 10th St to S. 10th St 

Hardscaping/  

Flagler Beach 

PE ‐ ; CST ‐   TBD  10%  2011  75  To be completed in the reconstruction of SR A1A 

66

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 17 

Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project

#  Project Name  Project Limits Project Type  Sponsor 

Needed Phase(s) 

Estimated Total Project 

Cost Local 

Match % Year 

Submitted Project Score  Comments 

10    15th St Sidewalk  Nova Rd to Center Av 

Sidewalk Holly Hill  PE ‐ $170,700; CST ‐ $542,304 (2017) 

$767,234  10%  2017  74.25   

11    SR A1A Pedestrian Safety Improvements  [multiple locations]  Crosswalks 

Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $18,000; CST ‐ $120,000 (2017) 

$144,000  10%  2017  73.50   

12  P15w‐102‐01 

S. Holly/E. Lansdowne Av Sidewalks  Graves Av to Blue Springs Av/Volusia Av to Orange Av 

Sidewalk Orange City 

PE – $101,294 CST ‐ $289,412 (2016)  

$492,883  10%  2015  72   

13  TBD  Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail  Orange Av to Intl. Speedway Bv 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $55,000; CST ‐ $385,500 CEI ‐ $77,000 (2016)  

$517,000  10%  2016  70.67   

14    Graham Swamp Trail Gap, Phase 2  Lehigh Trail to Graham Swamp Trail head 

Trail  Palm Coast 

PE ‐ $350,000; CST ‐ $250,000 (2017) 

$3,100,000  10%  2017  66.75   

15  TBD  Reed Canal Rd Shared Use Path  Nova Rd to Ridgewood Av 

Trail  South Daytona 

PE ‐ $725,608; CST‐TBD (2016) 

TBD  10%  2016  66.33   

16  P15w‐103‐01 

US 1 Sidewalk  Airport Rd to Wilmette Av 

Sidewalk Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $28,000 CST ‐ $253,000 (2015)  

$281,000   10%  2015  65   

17  P14e‐102‐01 

Lehigh Trailhead  At Palm Coast Tennis Center 

Trailhead Palm Coast 

PE ‐ $100,000; CST ‐ TBD (2016)

TBD  10%  2014  64.38   

18  P14e‐103‐01 

Derbyshire Park Trail and Sidewalks   Internal to Derbyshire Park 

Trail and Sidewalk

Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $458,736 (2014) 

$458,736  10%  2014  63.5   

19  P15w‐104‐01 

Bunnell Elementary School Sidewalks  [multiple limits]  Sidewalk Bunnell  PE ‐ $83,467 CST ‐ $417,333 (2015) 

$500,800  10%  2015  57   

67

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 18 

Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project

#  Project Name  Project Limits Project Type  Sponsor 

Needed Phase(s) 

Estimated Total Project 

Cost Local 

Match % Year 

Submitted Project Score  Comments 

20  P14w‐106‐01 

Derbyshire Park Sidewalk  Vine St to Nova Rd and Brentwood St to 5th St 

Sidewalk Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $413,648 (2014) 

$413,648  10%  2014  54   

21  TBD  SR 44 Median Improvements, Phase 2  Glencoe Rd to Sugarmill Dr 

Landscaping and Median Improvements 

New Smyrna Beach 

PE ‐ $80,000; CST ‐ $548,000; CEI ‐ $20,000 (2015) 

$648,000  10%  2015  52.75   

22  P10e‐134‐01 

Tarragona Way Sidewalk  Australia St to Museum St 

Sidewalk Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $300,894 (2014) 

$300,894  10%  2006  35   

    

68

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 19 

Tier "C" – Projects Awaiting Feasibility Study Priority Ranking  R2CTPO Project#  Project Name  Project Limits  Project Type Sponsor  Local Match %  Year Submitted  Project Score  Comments 

1  TBD  Flomich St Sidewalk, Phase 2  Decatur St to Ridgewood Av  Sidewalk  Holly Hill  10%  2016  71.80  

2    Ponce Inlet Mobility Project  [multiple limits]  Sidewalk  Ponce Inlet  10%  2017  68   

3    Turnbull Bay Road Trail  Industrial Park Av to Fairgreen Av  Trail  New Smyrna Beach 10%  2017  59   

4  S11w‐121‐01  SR 442 Sidewalk  I‐95 to Air Park Rd  Sidewalk  Edgewater  10%  2016  57.83   

5    Taylor Road Sidewalk  Leaning Tree Place to Blue Lake Av  Sidewalk  DeLand  10%  2017  57.75   

6    Madeline Av Sidewalk  Clyde Morris Bv to Nova Rd  Sidewalk  Port Orange  10%  2017  57.50   

7  S15w‐102‐01  Willow Run Bv Sidewalk  Harms Way to Clyde Morris Bv  Sidewalk  Port Orange  10%  2015  57   

8    Sugarmill Drive Trail  NSB Multi‐Use Trail to Gibralter Bv   Trail  New Smyrna Beach 10%  2017  56.5   

9  S15p‐107‐01  Magnolia Av Shared Use Path Reed Canal Rd to Beville Rd    Trail  South Daytona  10%  2015  56.3   

10    South St Trail  Turnbull Bay Rd to US 1  Trail  New Smyrna Beach 10%  2017  56.25   

11  S15w‐103‐01  Center Av Sidewalk, Phase 2  3rd St to LPGA Bv  Sidewalk  Holly Hill  10%  2015  55.7   

12  S15p‐108‐01  Anastasia Dr Shared Use Path Reed Canal Rd to Big Tree Rd  Trail  South Daytona  10%  2015  52.3   

13    Ocean Av Sidewalk  S. Peninsula Av to S. Atlantic Av  Sidewalk  New Smyrna Beach 10%  2017  52.25   

14  S14p‐108‐01  Volusia Gap  US 17‐92 Bridge to Spring to Spring Trail  Trail  Volusia County  10%  2014  43   

15    Art Center Bv Sidewalk  Sundance Trail to US 1  Sidewalk  New Smyrna Beach 10%  2017  44   

16  S11w‐110‐01  Lambert Av Sidewalk  Palm Dr to Lambert Cove  Sidewalk  Flagler Beach  10%  2016  35.5    TBD – to be determined

69

DRAF

T

 

Pg 20 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transit Projects [DRAFT 5/9/17] 

Priority Rank  FDOT FM#  R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s) Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

                     

Note:  Transit projects are typically identified by the designated recipient of transit funding. No transit projects have been identified at this time.

70

DRAF

T

 

Pg 21 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transportation Planning Studies [DRAFT 5/9/17] 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Study ID#  Study Name Study Limits Sponsor

Programmed (Year)

Estimated Total Study 

CostYear 

Submitted  Score  Comments 1      Mason Avenue Corridor Study  from Riverside Dr to Williamson 

Blvd Daytona Beach 

‐  $75,000  2015  35.75  FDOT is committed to a “partnership”, but can’t initiate before FY 17/18. 

2      SR 44 & Beresford Avenue Extension  from Kepler Rd to SR 44  DeLand  ‐  $100,000  2015  34.88   

      LPGA Blvd Corridor Management Plan  LPGA Blvd from US 92 to SR 5A (Nova Rd) 

Volusia County 

‐    2017  33.56   

3      Beachside Neighborhood Pedestrian Safety, Mobility & Access 

beachside in Daytona Beach  Daytona Beach 

‐  $75,000  2015  32.50   

4      Ft Florida Road Planning Study  US 17   DeBary  ‐  $75,000  2016  31.83   

5      DeBary Village Center Corridor Improvement Study 

from Highbanks Rd at US 17‐92 to Plantation Rd at US 17‐92. 

DeBary  ‐  TBD  2017  31.78   

6      West extension of DeLand Greenway  downtown area along the DeLand Greenway or Alabama Greenway to the Spring to Spring Trail between Minnesota Av south to Euclid Av 

DeLand  ‐  $25,000 to $55,000 

2017  29.89   

7      New Smyrna Beach Trolley Feasibility Study  City‐wide  New Smyrna Beach 

‐   $50,000  2016  27.67   

8      New Smyrna Beach US 1 Complete Streets  South city limit to north city limit 

New Smyrna Beach 

‐   $64,000  2016  27.50   

9      Flagler Beach Multi‐Modal Hub Study  City‐wide  Flagler Beach 

‐  $150,000  2017  25.44   

10      Daytona Beach Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan 

City‐wide  Daytona Beach 

‐  $115,000  2015  24.75   

11      I‐95/ US 1 Interchange Modifications  at SR 5/US 1    ‐  TBD  2016  (not scored) 

SIS Needs List 

71

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transportation Planning Studies 

Pg 22 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Study ID#  Study Name Study Limits Sponsor

Programmed (Year)

Estimated Total Study 

CostYear 

Submitted  Score  Comments 12      I‐95/LPGA Blvd Interchange Modifications  at LPGA Blvd    ‐  TBD  2016  (not 

scored) SIS Needs List 

13      I‐95/Pioneer Trail New Interchange  at Pioneer Trail    ‐  TBD  2016  (not scored) 

Volusia County‐Funded Projects List 

TBD – to be determined 

72

DRAF

TPg 1 

River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization

2016 2017 LIST OF PRIORITY PROJECTS   Page 

STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM (SIS) PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 

REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT, NON‐SIS ROADWAY PROJECTS  ............................................................................................................................................... 4 

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, SAFETY, AND LOCAL INITIATIVES PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................. 7 

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN AND B/P LOCAL INITIATIVES PROJECTS ......................................................................................................................................... 20 

TRANSIT PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3031 

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STUDIES ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3132 

73

DRAF

TPg 2 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Projects ADOPTED 6/22/16DRAFT 5/9/17 

Priority Rank1  FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits Project Type  Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

1  4084642  P12s‐202‐01 

I‐4 widening to 10 Lanes (1‐4 Beyond the Ultimate) 

Volusia/Seminole county line to 1/2 mile east of SR 472 

widening PE ‐$6,400,000$1,228,818 ‐ FY 14/1516/17 and FY 15/16; ENV ‐ $150,270 ‐ FY 17/18

ROW ‐ $46.355 million;CST ‐ $372.07 million (all costs are 2014) 

$424.8 million  To be funded as a public‐private partnership using tolled lanes 

      SR 472 ‐ widen from 4 lanes to 6 

Graves Av to Kentucky/MLK Blvd 

widening CST ‐ $40.48 million, $40.48 million  To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project; also on Regionally‐Significant, Non‐SIS List 

      Saxon Blvd Ramp/Roadway

I‐4 to Normandy Blvd

CST ‐ $35.38 million $35.38 million  To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project 

      Rhode Island Extension Veterans Memorial Pkwy to Normandy Blvd

CST ‐ $34.87 million $34.87 million  To be undertaken as part of the I‐4 Beyond the Ultimate Project 

2  4102511  P10s‐205‐01 

SR 15 (US 17) ‐ widen to 4 lanes 

Ponce de Leon Blvd to SR 40 

widening  PE ‐ $2,050,000 $455,410 ‐ FY 14/1516/17; ROW ‐ $11,005,890$ 13,691,472  ‐ FY 14/15FY 16/17 through FY 17/18FY 20/21; RRU ‐ $3,000,000 ‐ FY 20/21; CST ‐ $50,186,043 ‐ FY 20/21 

CST ‐ $33.4 million (plus $5‐6 million for multi‐use trail) (all costs are 2014)  

$55.36$76.7 million 

FULLY‐FUNDED 

3  4289471  P11s‐201‐01 

SR 40 ‐ widen to 6 lanes Williamson to Breakaway Tr 

widening PD&E ‐ $583,917 –FY 10/11 through FY 14/15 

PE ‐ $2.13 million, ENV ‐$0.13, ROW ‐ $7.43 million, CST ‐ $22.99 million,  (all costs are 2014)

$33 .26 million (2014) 

Also on Regionally‐Significant, Non‐SIS List 

4  2408371  P10s‐206‐01 

SR 40  ‐ widen to 4 lanes Cone Rd to SR 11 widening PE/ENV ‐ $6,560,991 –FY 12 through FY 15 

ROW ‐ $2.3 million,CST ‐ $41.5  million (all costs are 2015)

$50.36 million   

                                                            1 Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program.  

74

DRAF

TPg 3 

Priority Rank1  FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits Project Type  Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

5  2408361  P10s‐207‐01 

SR 40 ‐ widen to 4 lanes SR 11 to SR 15 (US 17) 

widening PE ‐ $3,307,549 – FY 13/14 ENV ‐ $400,000$4,500,000 ‐ FY 14/15FY 16/17 ROW ‐ $5,246,000 ‐ FY 21/22

ROW ‐ $7.5 million,CST ‐ $30.4$35.0 million; (all costs are 20152017) 

$41.6$48.5 million (20152017) 

 

6      SR 100 ‐ widen to 6 lanes  

Old Kings Rd to Belle Terre Pkwy  

widening  ROW ‐ $3.17 million; CST ‐ $31.70 million 

$34.87 million (2015) 

Also on Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Projects List 

75

DRAF

T

 

Pg 4 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Projects ADOPTED 6/22/16 DRAFT 5/9/17 

Priority Rank2 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits Project Type Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

1      US 1 intersections (from the US 1 AIS) 

  intersection improvements

‐ ‐  ‐ ‐     

4371211    SR 5 (US 1) at Park Av SR 5 (US 1) at Park Av ‐ ‐  PE‐ $200,000$372,000 ‐FY 19/20 

CST TBD  Southbound right turn lane added as part of FM# 4268891, US 1 Median Modifications); PE for signal system upgrade to improve intersection operations is programmed in FY 19/20 

2409925  P10r‐210‐05 

SR 5 (US 1) at Canal St Intersection Improvements 

SR 5 (US 1) at Canal St ‐ ‐  PE ‐ $107,342 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $5,718 – FY 16/17; RRU ‐ $605,264 – FY CST ‐ $4,360,519$4,887,349 ‐ FY 18/19

‐ ‐ $5,862,9147,345,128  FULLY‐FUNDED 

2409927  P10r‐210‐08 

SR 5 (US 1) at Reed Canal Rd Intersection Improvements 

SR 5 (US 1) at Reed Canal Rd  ‐ ‐  PE ‐ $7,793 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $15,152 – FY 16/17; CST ‐ $1,034,977$1,279,781 ‐ FY 17/1816/17 through FY 17/18

‐ ‐ $1,531,349$2,485,713  FULLY‐FUNDED 

2409928  P10r‐210‐06 

SR 5 (US 1) at Big Tree Rd Intersection Improvements 

SR 5 (US 1) at Big Tree Rd Intersection 

‐ ‐  PE ‐ $10,389 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $17,171 – FY 16/17; CST ‐ $687,829$635,530 ‐ FY 17/18

‐ ‐ $961,925$1,237,336  FULLY‐FUNDED 

2  4081781  P10r‐212‐01 

SR 483 (Clyde Morris Blvd) widen to 6 lanes 

SR 400 (Beville Rd) to SR 600 (US 92 ‐ International Speedway Blvd) 

widening  PE ‐ $13,934 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $19,465,853$24,673,760 ‐ FY 17/18 through FY 19/20FY 21/22

CST ‐ $30.6 $29.1million (20152017) 

$66,400,000$70.1  CST cost matches CFLRoads info last updated 20152017 

                                                            2 Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program. 

76

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects – Continued…  

Pg 5 

Priority Rank2 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits Project Type Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

3  4159641  P14r‐202‐01 

Old Kings Rd widen from 2 lanes to 4 

Palm Coast Pkwy to Forest Grove Dr 

widening  ROW ‐ $60,000 ‐FY 14/15 

CST ‐ $13,250,000 (2014); CEI ‐ $1,600,000 (2014)

$17,260,000  Cost estimates per Table 1, Palm Coast FY 14/15 ‐ FY 2018/19 FDOT 5‐Yr Work Program Project Priorities 

4  ‐ ‐  P11r‐208‐01 

SR 44 – Miscellaneous upgrades to improve access to DeLand SunRail 

between SR 15A and SunRail Station 

misc. upgrades to improve access to the SunRail station 

‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $1.74,CST ‐ $17.36 

$19,100,000  SR 44 corridor study completed  

5  4226271  P11R‐209‐01 

US 92 – widen from 4 to 6 lanes 

I‐4 EB Ramps to SR 600 (US 92) to CR 415 (Tomoka Farms Rd) 

widening  PE ‐ $185,655 – FY 16/17; ROW ‐ $6,185,020$9,863,891 ‐ FY 18/19 through FY 19/20FY 21/22; ENV ‐ $1,500,000 – FY 16/17

CST ‐ $25.427 $23.0 million (20132017) 

$18,600,000$37.5  CST cost estimate from CFLRoads (2017); FDOT to provide updated estimate by mid June 2015 

6  4355611  P14r‐203‐01 

Old Kings Road Extension ‐Phase II 

Matanzas Woods Pkwy to Old Kings Rd 

new road construction 

ROW ‐ $600,000 ‐FY 15/16, CST ‐ $4,500,000$3,782,318 ‐ FY 18/19

‐ ‐ $5,600,000  FULLY‐FUNDED 

7  4271181 and 

4271182 

P14r‐204‐01 

Commerce Pkwy Connector Road – new 2 lane roadway 

SR 100 to US 1  new road construction 

PD&E ‐ $488,000PE ‐ $811,000 

CST ‐ $4,073,000 (2015) 

$5,372,000  $694,000 remaining in LAP to apply toward CST; 60% plans w/ revised cost estimate expected June 2015 

8  4336751  P14r‐205‐01 

Matanzas Woods Pkwy –(west) – widen to 4 lanes 

US 1 to I‐95 southbound ramps 

widening  PE ‐ $1,903,000 ‐FY 17/18FY 18/19 

ROW ‐ $183,000; ENV ‐ $28,000; CST ‐ $12,653,000;CEI ‐ $1,265,000

$16,032,000  Cost estimates per Table 1, Palm Coast FY 14/15 ‐ FY 18/19 FDOT 5‐Yr Work Program Project Priorities 

9      SR 600/SR15 (US 17/92) –Emerging SIS 

SR 472 to SR 15A (Taylor Rd)  not yet determined

‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3,000,000CST ‐ $27,000,000

$30,000,000   

10      LPGA Blvd  ‐ widen to 3 lanes SR 5A (Nova Rd) to SR 5/US 1

widening  ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3,500,000CST ‐ $9,000,000

$12,500,000   

11      Howland Blvd ‐ widen to 4lanes 

Providence Blvd to Elkcam Blvd

widening  ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $2,500,000CST ‐ $11,820,000

$14,320,000   

77

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects – Continued…  

Pg 6 

Priority Rank2 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits Project Type Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

12      North Entrance DeLand Airport  (Industrial Park)

Industrial Park to SR 11 new road ‐ ‐ CST ‐ $970,000 $970,000   

13  4289471    SR 40 ‐ widen to 6 lanes Williamson Blvd to Breakaway Trails 

widening  PD&E ‐ $583,917$5,881– FY 10/11 through FY 14/15FY 16/17 

PE ‐ $2.13 million, ENV ‐ $0.13, ROW ‐ $7.43 million, CST ‐ $22.99 million, 

PD&E ‐ $583,917 – FY 10/11 through 

FY 14/15 

Also on SIS Projects List 

14      SR 100 – widen to 6 lanes Old Kings Rd to Belle Terre Pkwy 

widening  ‐ ‐ ROW ‐ $3.17million CST ‐ $31.70 million

$34,870,000  Also on SIS Projects List 

15      SR 442 Extension  SR 442 to SR 415 PD&E for new road 

‐ ‐ PD&E ‐$10,000,000

$10,000,000   

Projects which are ranked one through five on the List of Prioritized Regionally Significant, Non‐SIS Roadway Projects will remain in their current spot or move to the next available higher spot until they are completed and drop out of the Work Program. 

78

DRAF

T

 

Pg 20 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

DRAFT 5/11/165/4/175/9/17 

Tier "A" – Projects with One or More Phases Funded 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits

Project Type

Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)

Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost 

Local Match %  Comments 

‐‐  4354871  P13w‐103‐01  Flagler Av Sidewalk  12th St to Park Av  Sidewalk  Edgewater  PE ‐ $41,115 FY 2015/16$4,312 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $416,830 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $457,945  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4355361  P13w‐106‐01  Victoria Gardens Bv Sidewalk 

Clyde Morris Bv to Appleview Way 

Sidewalk  Port Orange 

PE ‐ $56,404 FY 2015/16; CST ‐ $153,843 FY 2018/19 

‐‐  $244,778  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4355351  P11p‐113‐01  Forrest Hills Connector 

Old Tomoka Rd to Scottdale Dr 

Trail  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $58,704 FY 2015/16$1,281 ‐ FY 2016/17; CST ‐ $589,288 FY 2016/17FY 17/18 

‐‐  $645,692  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4355321  P11w‐102‐01  Big Tree Rd Shared Use Path 

James St to Nova Rd 

Trail  South Daytona 

CST ‐ $577,500 FY 16/17  ‐‐  $577,500  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4355391  P13w‐110‐01  N. Spruce Creek Rd Sidewalk 

Nova Rd to Angelina Ct  

Sidewalk  Port Orange 

PE ‐ $75,563$74,355 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $404,595 FY 17/18FY 18/19 

‐‐  $478,158  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  435881  P13w‐112‐01  Magnolia St Sidewalk 6th St to 10th St  Sidewalk  New Smyrna Beach 

CST – 57,928 FY 16/17  ‐‐  $57,928  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  43613914398661 

P14‐104‐01  Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail

Wilder Bv to Shady Place 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE – 101,000  ‐ FY 16/17CST ‐ $525,517 FY 18/19$400,000 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $525,517  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED (from Regional Trail Project List) 

‐‐  4364341  P14n‐601‐01  Seminole/Volusia Gap 

Wayside Park to (Seminole County) Spring to Spring Trail (Volusia County) 

Trail  Volusia County 

CST ‐ $2,572,266 ‐ FY 16/17$1,379,067$25,675 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $2,099,356  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED (from Regional Trail Project List) 

‐‐  4106761  P14n‐605‐01  Black Bear Scenic Trail 

SR 35 (Marion County) to US 17 (Volusia County) 

Trail  Volusia County 

PD&E ‐ $4,620 FY 15/16$4,620 ‐ FY 16/17 

PE, CST  TBD  0%  (from Regional Trail Project List) 

79

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 21 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits

Project Type

Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)

Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost 

Local Match %  Comments 

‐‐  4354991  P13w‐104‐01  W. French Av Sidewalk 

N. Carpenter Av to Valentine Park 

Sidewalk  Orange City  PE ‐ $59,338 FY 15/16  CST  TBD  10%   

 ‐ FY1‐‐  4355001  P13w‐105‐01  McDonald Rd Sidewalk 

Sauls Rd to 6th St  Sidewalk  Port Orange 

PE ‐ $2,297 FY 15/16  CST  TBD  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4353814355381 

P13p‐109‐01  W. French Av Shared Use Path 

Spring to Spring Trail to Valentine Park 

Trail  Orange City PE ‐ $494,419 FY 15/16; ROW ‐ $4,449 FY 16/17$19,299 ‐ FY 16/17 

ROW; CST  TBD  10%   

‐‐  4398671  TBD  Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail

Shady Place to Bellevue Av 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $510,000 FY 16/17  ‐‐  $510,000  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List) 

‐‐  43021714302172 

P10p‐155‐01  Alabama Av Trail   Minnesota Av to US 92 

Trail  DeLand  PECST ‐ $1,344,112 ‐ FY 19/20   CST‐‐  TBD$1,344,112  0%  Design Underway 

‐‐  4302172  P10p‐156‐01  Alabama Av Trail  US 92 to Sperling Sports Complex 

Trail  DeLand  CST ‐ $1,344,112 FY 19/20  ‐‐  $1,344,112  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

‐‐  4390371  P15p‐101‐01  Beville Rd Shared Use Path 

Williamson Bv to Clyde Morris Bv 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $131,800 ‐ FY 16/17CST ‐ $131,800 FY 17/18$964,030 ‐ FY 2020/21 

‐‐  $131,800$1,095,830  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED (from Tier B) 

‐‐  4154348  P14e‐160‐01  East Central Regional Rail Trail (ECRRT) 

Guise Rd to Gobbler’s Lodge Rd

Trail  Volusia County 

CST ‐ $4,432,301 FY 18/19$5,003,500 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $4,432,301$5,003,500  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List) 

‐‐  4154349  P14e‐160‐02  ECRRT  Gobbler’s Lodge Rd to Maytown Spur  

Trail  Volusia County 

$730,327 FY 16/17   ‐‐  $730,327  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List) 

‐‐  4154343  P10e‐160‐04  ECRRT  Brevard County Line to Cow Creek 

Trail  Volusia County 

CST ‐ $2,989,804 FY 15/16$2,512,308 FY 16/17   

‐‐  $2,989,804  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List) 

‐‐  4390391  P10e‐121‐01  Spring to Spring Trail  Detroit Terrace to US 17‐92 

Trail  Volusia County 

PE ‐ $396,000 FY 17/18$299,271 ‐ FY 16/17 

ROW, CST  TBD  10%  (from TAP List)   

‐‐  4102511  P10e‐122‐01  US 17 Trail  W. Baxter St to SR 40 

Trail  Volusia County 

PE, ROW,CST  CST‐‐  TBD  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED (from TAP List) Included in roadway widening project 

  4398741    Spring to Spring Trail  Lake Beresford Park to Grand Av 

Trail  Volusia County 

PE ‐ $751,000 ‐ FY 16/17  CST  TBD  0%  SUN Trail 

80

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 22 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits

Project Type

Project Sponsor Programmed Phase(s)

Needed Phase(s)

Estimated Total Project Cost 

Local Match %  Comments 

  4390571    Nova Rd Trail  Bellevue Av to South St 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $298,116 ‐ FY FY 16/17  ‐‐  $298,116  10%   

  4398691    Halifax River Greenway Trail 

Marina Point Dr to Orange Av 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $101,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $450,000 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $551,000  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED SUN Trail 

  4399711    Freemont Av Sidewalk 

Niles St to US 1  Sidewalk  Daytona Beach 

CST (RR Xing Only)  ‐ $350,000 – FY 16/17 

PE, CST for sidewalk segments 

     

  4399721    North St Sidewalk  Clyde Morris Bv to Nova Rd 

Sidewalk  Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $325,562 FY 16/17    $325,562  10%   

  4398771    US 17 Trail  Washington Av to Palmetto Av 

Trail  Pierson  PE ‐ $301,000 ‐ FY 17/18  ‐‐  $1,424,240  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED  SUN Trail 

  4398651    Riverwalk Shared Use Path 

US 1 from Canal St to Beville Rd 

Trail  Port Orange 

PD&E Study ‐ $1,510,000; PE ‐ $4,000,000 – FY 18/19 

CST  $5,510,000  0%  SUN Trail 

  4408481    Deltona Lakes/Spirit Elem Sidewalks 

[multiple limits]  Sidewalk  Deltona  PE ‐ $15,901 ‐  FY 17/18  CST  TBD  10%   

  4391951    Spring to Spring Connector Trail 

Spring to Spring Trail to US 17‐92 

Trail  DeBary  PE ‐ $25,000 ‐  FY 16/17; CST ‐ $225,000 ‐  FY 18/19 

‐‐  $250,000  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED Coast to Coast Trail 

  4398681    Halifax River Greenway Trail 

Bellevue to Marina Point Dr 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $66,000 ‐ FY 16/17; CST ‐ $450,000 ‐ FY 17/18 

‐‐  $516,000  0%  FULLY‐FUNDED  SUN Trail 

  4408521    Tomoka Elementary Connector Sidewalk 

Main Trail to Granada Bv 

Sidewalk  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $28,400 ‐ FY 17/18  CST  TBD  10%   

  4408531    Williamson Bv/Hand Av Pedestrian Improvements 

Hand Av to Regal Theater Driveway 

Sidewalk  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $28,400  CST  TBD  10%   

  4409061    Navy Canal Trail  Museum Bv to Clyde Morris Bv 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $48,500; CST ‐ $250,570  ‐‐  $299,070  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

  4409411    Tomoka State Park Trail 

Sanchez Park to Tomoka State Park 

Trail  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $87,000  CST  TBD  10%   

  4408541    Lakeview Bv Trail  Matanzas Parkway to London Dr 

Trail  Palm Coast  CST ‐ $563,771  ‐‐  $563,771  10%  FULLY‐FUNDED 

81

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 23 

Tier "B" – Projects Ready for Funding 

Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project

#  Project Name  Project Limits Project Type  Sponsor 

Needed Phase(s) 

Estimated Total Project 

Cost Local 

Match % Year 

Submitted Project Score  Comments 

1  P15w‐101‐01 

N. Orange/E. Graves Av Sidewalks  French Av to University Av/Thorpe Av to Leavitt Av 

Sidewalk Orange City 

PE ‐ $56,587; CST ‐ $185,665 (2015) 

$241,952  10%  2015  87  Protected Status 

2  P10e‐128‐01 

Spring to Spring Trail, Segments 5 and 6  Lake Beresford Park to Minnesota Av 

Trail  Volusia County 

PLN ‐ $515,500; PE ‐ $227,059; ROW; CST ‐ $1,740,789 

TBD  10%  2010  85  Protected Status (from TAP List)Moved to Tier “A” 

3  P14p‐101‐01 

Nova Rd Trail  Bellevue Av to South St 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $118,433  $118,433  10%  2014  80  Protected StatusMoved to Tier “A” 

4  P14p‐102‐01 

Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail  Live Oak Av to Orange Av 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $60,904  $60,904  10%  2014  78  Protected Status Moved to Tier “A” 

5  P10e‐130‐01 

Spring to Spring Trail, Phase 7B  Lemon St to King St  Trail  Volusia County 

PE ‐ $162,752 (2013); CST ‐ $1,247,769 (2013) 

$2,100,000   10%  2006  56  Protected Status (from TAP List) 

  P10e‐123‐01 

Fremont Av Sidewalk  Niles St to US 1  Sidewalk Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $439,631 (2014) 

  10%  2005  ‐‐ 

Protected Status (from TAP List)Moved to Tier “A” 

8  P10e‐124‐01 

North St Sidewalk  Clyde Morris Bv to Nova Rd 

Sidewalk Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $399,190  TBD  10%  2005    Protected Status (from TAP List)Moved to Tier “A” 

92  PP12e‐101‐01 

Flagler Beach Multimodal Hub  S. Flagler Av business district  

Multimodal  

Flagler Beach 

PE, CST  TBD  10%  2012  81   Parking/Transit Stop/Transit Circulator/Bicycle Rentals 

10  TBD  US 17 Sidewalk  Washington Av to Palmetto Av 

Sidewalk Pierson  PE ‐ $94,430; CST ‐ $472,148 (2016) 

$614,983  10%  2016  79.4   

82

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 24 

Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project

#  Project Name  Project Limits Project Type  Sponsor 

Needed Phase(s) 

Estimated Total Project 

Cost Local 

Match % Year 

Submitted Project Score  Comments 

11  P15p‐102‐01 

Riverwalk Shared Use Path  Dunlawton Av to Ocean Av 

Trail  Port Orange 

PE ‐ $65,000; CST ‐ $341,218 (2016) 

$406,218  10%  2014  77   

12  TBD  Deltona Lakes and Spirit Elem. Sidewalk Program  [multiple limits]  Sidewalk Deltona  PE ‐ $149,010; CST ‐ $397,360 (2016) 

$894,060  10%  2016  76.83   

13  TBD  Spring to Spring Connector Trail  Spring to Spring Trail to US 17‐92  

Trail  DeBary  PE ‐ $25,000; CST ‐ $225,000 (2016) 

$250,000  10%  2016  76.67   

14  TBD  Halifax River/East Coast Greenway  Bellevue Av to Live Oak Av 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $55,000; ROW ‐ $385,000CST ‐ $401,500 (2016) 

 $924,000  10%  2016  76    

2    Providence Bv Shared Use Path  Spring to Spring Trail to Alexander Dr and Tivoli Dr to Joyner Dr  

Trail  Deltona  PE ‐ $284,256; CST ‐ $1,421,281 (2017) 

$1,918,729  10%  2017  90.25   

3    East ISB Beachside Corridor Improvement Plan  US 92 Bridge to SR A1A 

Sidewalk Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $750,000; ROW ‐ $20,000,000; CST ‐ $6,000,000 (2017) 

$27,500,000  10%  2017  85.75   

4    Coast to Coast Trail Wayfinding Signage Improvements 

Lake Monroe Park to Rotary Park 

Signage  Volusia County 

PE/CST ‐ $150,000 (2017)

$150,000  10%  2017  82   

5    W. French Av Sidewalk and Bike Lane  N. Carpenter Av to Valentine Park 

Sidewalk and Bike Lane 

Orange City 

CST ‐ $579,083 (2017) 

CST $579,083 10%  2017  76.75  This project replaces FM #4354991. 

6    Center Av, Phase 1 Sidewalk  LPGA Bv to Flomich St 

Sidewalk Holly Hill  PE ‐ $207,208; CST ‐ $664,026 (2017) 

$937,667  10%  2017  76   

83

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 25 

Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project

#  Project Name  Project Limits Project Type  Sponsor 

Needed Phase(s) 

Estimated Total Project 

Cost Local 

Match % Year 

Submitted Project Score  Comments 

7    Ormond Beach Downtown Crosswalk RRFB  Southside of SR 40 to Northside of SR 40 

RRFB  Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $10,000; CST ‐ $36,750 (2017) 

$52,750  0%  2017  75.25   

158  P14w‐103‐01 

Flomich St Sidewalk  Nova Rd to Decatur St  

Sidewalk Holly Hill  PE ‐ $87,110 ROW ‐ $79,050 CST ‐ $340,729 (2016) 

$506,889  10%  2014  75   

169  P11e‐126‐01 

SR A1A National Scenic & Historic Coastal Byway Beautification, Phase 1 

N. 10th St to S. 10th St 

Hardscaping/ landscaping 

Flagler Beach 

PE ‐ $75,000; CST ‐ $675,000 

$750,000 (2011)TBD 

10%  2011  75  To be completed in the reconstruction of SR A1A 

17  TBD  Tomoka Elementary Connector Sidewalk  Main Trail to Granada Bv 

Sidewalk Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $16,200 CST ‐ $108,000 CEI ‐ $10,800 (2016) 

$135, 000  10%  2016  72.50   

10    15th St Sidewalk  Nova Rd to Center Av 

Sidewalk Holly Hill  PE ‐ $170,700; CST ‐ $542,304 (2017) 

$767,234  10%  2017  74.25   

11    SR A1A Pedestrian Safety Improvements  [multiple locations]  Crosswalks 

Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $18,000; CST ‐ $120,000 (2017) 

$144,000  10%  2017  73.50   

1812  P15w‐102‐01 

S. Holly/E. Lansdowne Av Sidewalks  Graves Av to Blue Springs Av/Volusia Av to Orange Av 

Sidewalk Orange City 

PE – $101,294 CST ‐ $289,412 (2016)  

$492,883  10%  2015  72   

1913  TBD  Halifax River/East Coast Greenway Trail  Orange Av to Intl. Speedway Bv 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

PE ‐ $55,000; CST ‐ $385,500 CEI ‐ $77,000 (2016)  

$517,000  10%  2016  70.67   

84

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 26 

Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project

#  Project Name  Project Limits Project Type  Sponsor 

Needed Phase(s) 

Estimated Total Project 

Cost Local 

Match % Year 

Submitted Project Score  Comments 

20  TBD  Williamson Bv/Hand Av Pedestrian Improvements  Hand Av to Regal Theater Driveway 

Sidewalk, Crosswalk, Pedestrian Signals 

Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $26,400 CST ‐ $176,00 CEI ‐ $17,600 (2016) 

$220,000  10%  2016  68.50   

21  P14e‐101‐01 

Navy Canal/Museum Bv Trail  Museum Bv to Clyde Morris Bv 

Trail  Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $225,973  $225,973  10%  2014  67.5  (from TAP List)  

14    Graham Swamp Trail Gap, Phase 2  Lehigh Trail to Graham Swamp Trail head 

Trail  Palm Coast 

PE ‐ $350,000; CST ‐ $250,000 (2017) 

$3,100,000  10%  2017  66.75   

2215  TBD  Reed Canal Rd Shared Use Path  Nova Rd to Ridgewood Av 

Trail  South Daytona 

PE ‐ $725,608; CST‐TBD (2016) 

TBD  10%  2016  66.33   

2316  P15w‐103‐01 

US 1 Sidewalk  Airport Rd to Wilmette Av 

Sidewalk Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $28,000 CST ‐ $253,000 (2015)  

$281,000   10%  2015  65   

2417  P14e‐102‐01 

Lehigh Trailhead  At Palm Coast Tennis Center 

Trailhead Palm Coast 

PE ‐ $100,000; CST ‐ TBD (2016)

TBD  10%  2014  64.38  (from TAP List) 

2518  P14e‐103‐01 

Derbyshire Park Trail and Sidewalks   Internal to Derbyshire Park 

Trail and Sidewalk

Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $458,736 (2014) 

$458,736  10%  2014  63.5  (from TAP List) 

26  P15p‐103‐31 

NSB Multi‐Use Trail  SR 44 to Gibraltar Bv 

Trail  New Smyrna Beach 

PE ‐ $28,000 CST ‐ $253,000 

$281,000  10%  2015  63  Removed by Project Sponsor 

2719  P15w‐104‐01 

Bunnell Elementary School Sidewalks  [multiple limits]  Sidewalk Bunnell  PE ‐ $83,467 CST ‐ $417,333 (2015) 

$500,800  10%  2015  57   

28  P14p‐105‐01 

Tomoka State Park Sidewalk  Sanchez Park to Tomoka State Park 

Sidewalk Ormond Beach 

PE ‐ $86,000 CST ‐ $789,627 

$875,626  10%  2014  55   

2920  P14w‐106‐01 

Derbyshire Park Sidewalk  Vine St to Nova Rd and Brentwood St to 5th St 

Sidewalk Daytona Beach 

CST ‐ $413,648 (2014) 

$413,648  10%  2014  54   

85

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 27 

Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project

#  Project Name  Project Limits Project Type  Sponsor 

Needed Phase(s) 

Estimated Total Project 

Cost Local 

Match % Year 

Submitted Project Score  Comments 

30  P14p‐107‐01 

Lakeview Bv Trail  Matanzas Parkway to London Dr 

Trail  Palm Coast 

CST ‐ $565,916  $565,916  10%  2014  53   

3121  TBD  SR 44 Median Improvements, Phase 2  Glencoe Rd to Sugarmill Dr 

Landscaping and Median Improvements 

New Smyrna Beach 

PE ‐ $80,000; CST ‐ $548,000; CEI ‐ $20,000 (2015) 

$648,000  10%  2015  52.75  (from TAP List) 

3222  P10e‐134‐01 

Tarragona Way Sidewalk  Australia St to Museum St 

Sidewalk Daytona Beach 

CST ‐$300,984 $300,894 (2014)

TBD$300,894 10%  2006  35  (from TAP List) 

    

86

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 28 

Tier "C" – Projects Awaiting Feasibility Study Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name  Project Limits  Project Type  Sponsor 

Local Match %

Year Submitted 

Project Score  Comments 

1  TBD  Halifax River Trail  Commonwealth Bv to Dunlawton Av 

Trail  Port Orange  10%  2016  78.80 SUN Trail;  

2  TBD  Thompson Creek Trail  Division Av to Wilmette Av  Trail  Ormond Beach  10%  2016  75.75 Initial project application submitted in 2011  

3  TBD  NSB West Canal Bike‐Ped Study 

W. Pine Av to S. Myrtle Av  Trail  New Smyrna Beach  10%  2016  74.60 SUN Trail;  

4  TBD  Port Orange Sidewalk Gaps  [multiple limits]  Sidewalk  Port Orange  10%  2016  73.20 Sidewalk gaps in 5 separate locations 

51  TBD  Flomich St Sidewalk, Phase 2 Decatur St to Ridgewood Av 

Sidewalk  Holly Hill  10%  2016  71.80  

6  TBD  South Daytona Riverwalk  South Daytona/Port Orange limit to Palmetto Av  

Trail  South Daytona  10%  2016  69.40 Tied with #7SUN Trail; 

7  TBD  15th Sidewalk  Nova Rd to Center Av   Sidewalk  Holly Hill  10%  2016  69.40 Tied with #6 

8  TBD  Oak Hill Sidewalk  Osteen St to Sunrise Park  Sidewalk  Oak Hill  10%  2016  65.25  

9  S14w‐105‐01 

Highbanks Rd Sidewalk  Simcoe St to Enterprise Rd  Sidewalk  DeBary  10%  2014  63   

10  S14w‐106‐01 

Center Av Sidewalk  Flomich St to LPGA Bv  Sidewalk  Holly Hill  10%  2014  58.3  

11  S15p‐106‐01 

US 1 Shared Use Path  Art Center Bv to Bayshore Dr  

Trail  New Smyrna Beach and Port Orange 

10%  2015  58 SUN Trail; 

2    Ponce Inlet Mobility Project  [multiple limits]  Sidewalk  Ponce Inlet  10%  2017  68   

3    Turnbull Bay Road Trail  Industrial Park Av to Fairgreen Av 

Trail  New Smyrna Beach  10%  2017  59   

124  S11w‐121‐01 

SR 442 Sidewalk  I‐95 to Air Park Rd  Sidewalk  Edgewater  10%  2016  57.83  Initial project application submitted in 2011 

5    Taylor Road Sidewalk  Leaning Tree Place to Blue Lake Av 

Sidewalk  DeLand  10%  2017  57.75   

87

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 

Pg 29 

Priority Ranking 

R2CTPO Project#  Project Name  Project Limits  Project Type  Sponsor 

Local Match %

Year Submitted 

Project Score  Comments 

6    Madeline Av Sidewalk  Clyde Morris Bv to Nova Rd Sidewalk  Port Orange  10%  2017  57.50   

137  S15w‐102‐01 

Willow Run Bv Sidewalk  Harms Way to Clyde Morris Bv 

Sidewalk  Port Orange  10%  2015  57   

8    Sugarmill Drive Trail  NSB Multi‐Use Trail to Gibralter Bv  

Trail  New Smyrna Beach  10%  2017  56.5   

149  S15p‐107‐01 

Magnolia Av Shared Use Path 

Reed Canal Rd to Beville Rd   Trail  South Daytona  10%  2015  56.3   

10    South St Trail  Turnbull Bay Rd to US 1  Trail  New Smyrna Beach  10%  2017  56.25   

1511  S15w‐103‐01 

Center Av Sidewalk, Phase 2  3rd St to LPGA Bv  Sidewalk  Holly Hill  10%  2015  55.7   

1612  TBD  Pedestrian Enhancements and Traffic Control Calming 

[multiple locations on SR A1A and SR 100] 

Pedestrian Signals and Speed Indicators

Flagler Beach  10%  2016  54  Removed by Project Sponsor Submitted on Traffic Operations and Safety Project Application 

1712  S15p‐108‐01 

Anastasia Dr Shared Use Path 

Reed Canal Rd to Big Tree Rd 

Trail  South Daytona  10%  2015  52.3   

13    Ocean Av Sidewalk  S. Peninsula Av to S. Atlantic Av 

Sidewalk  New Smyrna Beach  10%  2017  52.25   

1814  S14p‐108‐01 

Volusia Gap  US 17‐92 Bridge to Spring to Spring Trail 

Trail  Volusia County  10%  2014  43   

15    Art Center Bv Sidewalk  Sundance Trail to US 1  Sidewalk  New Smyrna Beach  10%  2017  44   

1916  S11w‐110‐01 

Lambert Av Sidewalk  Palm Dr to Lambert Cove  Sidewalk  Flagler Beach  10%  2016  35.5  Initial project application submitted in 2011 

20  S12w‐109‐01 

Herbert St Sidewalk‐East  Jackson St to Railroad Crossing 

Sidewalk  Port Orange  10%  2012  35  Removed by Project Sponsor 

 TBD – to be determined

88

DRAF

T

 

Pg 30 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transit Projects ADOPTED 6/22/16[DRAFT 5/9/17 

Priority Rank  FDOT FM#  R2CTPO Project#  Project Name Project Limits Project Type Sponsor Programmed Phase(s) Needed Phase(s) Estimated Total Project Cost  Comments 

                     

Note:  Transit projects are typically identified by the designated recipient of transit funding. No transit projects have been identified at this time.

89

DRAF

T

 

Pg 31 

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transportation Planning Studies ADOPTED 6/22/16[DRAFT 5/9/17 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Study ID#  Study Name Study Limits Sponsor

Programmed (Year)

Estimated Total Study 

CostYear 

Submitted  Score  Comments 1      Mason Avenue Corridor Study  from Riverside Dr to Williamson 

Blvd Daytona Beach 

‐  $75,000  2015  35.75  FDOT is committed to a “partnership”, but can’t initiate before FY 17/18. 

2      SR 44 & Beresford Avenue Extension  from Kepler Rd to SR 44  DeLand  ‐  $100,000  2015  34.88   

3      LPGA Blvd Corridor Management Plan  LPGA Blvd from US 92 to SR 5A (Nova Rd) 

Volusia County 

‐    2017  33.56   

34      Beachside Neighborhood Pedestrian Safety, Mobility & Access 

beachside in Daytona Beach  Daytona Beach 

‐  $75,000  2015  32.50   

45      Ft Florida Road Planning Study  US 17   DeBary  ‐  $75,000  2016  31.83   

5      DeBary Village Center Corridor Improvement Study 

from Highbanks Rd at US 17‐92 to Plantation Rd at US 17‐92. 

DeBary  ‐  TBD  2017  31.78   

6      West extension of DeLand Greenway  downtown area along the DeLand Greenway or Alabama Greenway to the Spring to Spring Trail between Minnesota Av south to Euclid Av 

DeLand  ‐  $25,000 to $55,000 

2017  29.89   

56      Daytona Beach Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan 

City‐wide  Daytona Beach 

‐  $115,000  2015  24.75   

67      New Smyrna Beach Trolley Feasibility Study  City‐wide  New Smyrna Beach 

‐   $50,000  2016  27.67   

78      New Smyrna Beach US 1 Complete Streets  South city limit to north city limit 

New Smyrna Beach 

‐   $64,000  2016  27.50   

9      Flagler Beach Multi‐Modal Hub Study  City‐wide  Flagler Beach 

‐  $150,000  2017  25.44   

510      Daytona Beach Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan 

City‐wide  Daytona Beach 

‐  $115,000  2015  24.75   

90

DRAF

T

River to Sea TPO List of Prioritized Transportation Planning Studies 

Pg 32 

Priority Rank 

FDOT FM# 

R2CTPO Study ID#  Study Name Study Limits Sponsor

Programmed (Year)

Estimated Total Study 

CostYear 

Submitted  Score  Comments 811      I‐95/ US 1 Interchange Modifications  at SR 5/US 1    ‐  TBD  2016  (not 

scored) SIS Needs List 

912      I‐95/LPGA Blvd Interchange Modifications  at LPGA Blvd    ‐  TBD  2016  (not scored) 

SIS Needs List 

1013      I‐95/Pioneer Trail New Interchange  at Pioneer Trail    ‐  TBD  2016  (not scored) 

Volusia County‐Funded Projects List 

 

TBD – to be determined 

91

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS B. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT FY 2017/18 – FY 2021/22 TRANSPORTATION

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) Background Information: The TPO is required by 23 U.S.C. 134(j) to develop a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is a prioritized listing of transportation projects covering a period of five years that is developed and formally adopted by the TPO, consistent with the Long Range Transportation Plan, and required for projects to be eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53. The TIP is developed in cooperation with FDOT and public transit operators.

The TIP lists capital and non-capital surface transportation projects proposed for funding under Title 23 U.S.C. and Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 (including transportation enhancements; safety projects; trails projects; pedestrian walkways; and bicycle facilities). Also required to be included are all regionally significant projects requiring an action by FHWA or FTA regardless of funding source and projects that implement paratransit plans required for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. For information and conformity purposes, the TIP includes all regionally significant projects to be funded with federal funds other than those administered by the FHWA or FTA, as well as all regionally significant projects to be funded with non-federal funds.

Robert Keeth, TPO Senior Planner, will lead a committee discussion regarding the draft FY 2017/18 to FY 2021/22 TIP which is available for download from the TPO’s website.

Also available for download from the TPO’s website is the TIP Comparison Report. This report provides a project by project comparison of the current FY 2016/17 – FY 2020/21 TIP and the draft FY 2017/18 – FY 2021/22 TIP.

Issues identified during this discussion will be addressed in a subsequent draft which will be presented to the CAC/TCC for final review and recommended approval in June.

The Draft FY 2017/18 – FY 2021/22 TIP and TIP Comparison Report are available for your review at: http://www.r2ctpo.org/agendasminutes/tcc/agenda/

ACTION REQUESTED:

NO ACTION REQUIRED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE

92

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS C. PRESENTATION AND UPDATE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PLAN

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Background Information:

The purpose of the Volusia County Bus Stop Improvement Plan is to better serve the general public with safe and accessible bus stops. The two-phased plan aims to update the existing bus stop database in a systematic format, to help identify roles for maintenance and to offer improvement strategies based on the individual city’s need. The effort is intended to identify a uniform process to document bus stop conditions throughout Volusia County and within each of the individual cities served by Votran. A final report and database will be prepared for the entire Votran fixed route transit system to identify infrastructure near existing bus stops and outline an approach for implementing improvements in unincorporated areas of the county. Phase II may extend the effort from Phase I to provide city profile reports for each of the individual cities based on the voluntary participation of the cities. The project scope was presented to the TPO Board and Advisory Committees in March. Under direction from the board, the draft Scope of Services for the study was distributed to TPO Board members and TCC members for further review and comments during April. One comment and one letter (attached) was received for the draft scope. ACTION REQUESTED: STAFF REQUESTS DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH THIS EFFORT

93

April 4, 2017

Volusia County Bus Stop Improvement Project (Phase I)

DRAFT Scope of Work

Purpose

The purpose of the Volusia County Bus Stop Improvement Plan is to better serve the general public with safe and accessible bus stops. The two-phased plan aims to update the existing bus stop database in a systematic format, to help identify roles for maintenance and to offer improvement strategies based on individual city’s need. The effort is intended to identify a uniform process to document bus stop conditions throughout Volusia County and within each of the individual cities served by Votran. A final report and database will be prepared for the entire Votran fixed route transit system to identify infrastructure near existing bus stops and outline an approach for implementing improvements in unincorporated areas of the county. Phase II may extend the effort from Phase I to provide city profile reports for each of the individual cities based on the voluntary participation of the cities.

Scope of Work/Plan Elements

Building on Votran’s existing bus stop inventory data, Phase I activities will use a systematic method for collecting and updating existing conditions data. A standardized industry database will be utilized for this data collection effort. Activities will be coordinated through a stakeholder group to ensure that local plans and policies are collected and understood and stakeholders can provide input and gain understanding of county efforts. Phase I will also develop the Unincorporated County’s Profile with input from and coordination with stakeholders. The Unincorporated County’s profile will include a coordinated plan for the unincorporated area in the County to implement improvements based on anticipated funding and/or resource availability over time. A bus stop maintenance agreement template will also be developed to serve as a basis for future efforts in service delivery. This can provide an example that can be modified for other individual jurisdictions.

Outcomes

1. Documentation of existing plans and policies of cities 2. A refined and updated database of existing infrastructure for Votran bus stops 3. A Transit Development Design Guideline (TDDG) cross-reference for all bus stops in the

inventory 4. Establishment of Key Contacts for Cities/Local Agencies

94

5. Improved communication and coordination with stakeholders 6. Unincorporated County Profile that includes planned improvements based on the jurisdiction’s

need 7. Bus Stop Inter-local Maintenance Agreement template

Staff meetings with project progress discussion will be held as needed. In addition to the documentation of the Phase I Plan, a final presentation will be made to Volusia County, the R2CTPO standing committees and board, and the public for comments. The final report will be presented for approval by the River to Sea TPO.

Deliverables

1. A Bus Stop Inter-local Maintenance Agreement Template 2. The Draft Bus Stop Improvement Plan Phase I Report 3. An updated bus stop database

Scope of Work

Phase I: System Existing Conditions and Unincorporated County Profile

Task 1: Kick-Off and Development of Goals, Objectives & Criteria The Consultant shall identify stakeholders that include representatives of cities interested in participating. The Consultant shall meet with Votran staff, River to Sea TPO staff and the project stakeholders to review the proposed scope of work and discuss the existing inventory in the ATSIM software system, verify the project schedule, refine tasks, and identify project communication and decision procedures. The Consultant shall establish a draft framework for the program that includes goals/objectives, policies/guiding principles, performance measures and targets, standards/requirements, and methodologies that address public access to Votran fixed route service. The Consultant shall meet with the project stakeholders to discuss the draft framework, and recommend a basis for developing a rating system that establishes categories of the unincorporated County’s bus stop conditions and further determines priorities within the jurisdiction.

Task 2: Overview of Existing Conditions

The consultant shall review Votran’s existing ATSIM database and categorize each bus stop, based upon the available ATSIM data and with Votran’s guidance, generally as follows:

95

· “Good” – A safe and viable route is provided for transit users to access the bus stop. The sidewalk slopes and surfaces are in good condition, lighting is adequate, the boarding and alighting area is of appropriate material and dimension, route signage is available, amenities are appropriate for the location, and obstructions are non-existent.

· “Fair” – A safe and viable route is provided to access the bus stop, the sidewalk slopes and surfaces are generally in fair condition, the boarding and alighting area is of appropriate material and dimensions, route signage is available, lighting is adequate and some amenities are provided as appropriate.

· “Poor” – A bus stop does not meet any of the above criteria.

Other factors, such as location, pedestrian crossing and etc. may also be considered in the category. The overall existing conditions data will be summarized. Task 3: Perform Unincorporated County Inventory Analysis The consultant shall create a sample Profile for the unincorporated County. As such, the consultant shall perform a comprehensive inventory assessment of Votran’s field data collection within the unincorporated Volusia County, which is estimated to contain approximately 300 bus stops.

The objectives of this work component are to: 1. Review the existing ATSIM bus stop inventory within the unincorporated County and

perform supplementary data collection as needed to compile a fully inclusive bus stop inventory of the system. The data collected during this task will include the identification and assessment of each bus stop’s accessibility issue(s), if any, including but not limited to: a. Board and alighting areas; b. Percent of slope and surface connections; c. Curb cuts, ramps, and detectable warnings; d. Signage, shelters, benches, and amenities; and e. Other accessibility issues, sidewalks, signs and poles, irrigation sprinklers, lighting,

protruding objects (such as trees), and pedestrian push buttons. Note: Task 3 will have an upset limit of $9,000 to allow for a wide range of supplementary, as-needed data collection and will be billed on a cost-plus basis, not to exceed this price. However, approval is required from the TPO and Votran project management staff prior to any Consultant’s filed activities. TPO and Votran staff will assist with the field data collection effort when possible to reduce project costs.

Task 4: Unincorporated County Bus Stop and Right of Way Improvements Votran’s existing unincorporated Volusia County ATSIM database and any newly collected bus stop inventory data will be refined to determine the necessary improvements needed to bring the jurisdiction’s approximately 300 bus stops into the adopted TDDG standard. In addition, any newly collected data whose attributes can be added logically to the ATSIM database will be included to provide Votran, and the County with a more complete bus stop attribute database.

96

Task 5: Prepare a Unincorporated County Plan The Consultant will prepare an unincorporated Volusia County plan, which will include:

· Identifying needed improvements at each bus stop o The design standard in the adopted TDDG shall be recommended to be implemented at

each bus stop that has barriers to accessibility. · A phasing program for implementing improvements based on the anticipated funding will be

developed. o This will involve using the established criteria for prioritization of improvements, as

determined by stakeholders in Task 1, as well as developing the following: 1. Detailed cost estimate associated with all necessary improvements; 2. A list of projects in consultation with Votran staff, stakeholders, and Volusia County

staff; and 3. Unincorporated Volusia County implementation schedule.

Task 6: Meetings and Documentation This task includes meetings, status reports, and documentation of the Phase 1 analysis.

1. Status meetings with Votran/TPO staff will be scheduled monthly, or as needed, and include stakeholders, as appropriate.

2. Coordination meetings with identified stakeholders to review the inventory, discuss and develop a three-tiered rating system for bus stops and that prioritizes projects for bus stop improvements in the unincorporated county (three meetings).

3. The Bus Stop Improvement Plan Phase I Reports will be created. An appendix will be included that contains a description of the database developed as part of the project, procedures for database updates, and the database in a GIS format. (Note: all data records generated by the project will be transferred to Votran for their use.)

4. The Consultant shall deliver a PDF of Bus Stop Improvement Plan Report to the Project Manager.

Phase II of the Plan will continue based on the voluntary participation of the individual jurisdictions.

97

98

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS D. FDOT REPORT Background Information: Mr. Gene Ferguson, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), will be present to answer questions regarding projects on the FDOT Construction Status Report. The Construction Status Report is provided for your information. ACTION REQUESTED: NO ACTION REQUIRED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE

99

Volusia/Flagler County Project Status Update as of April 21, 2017

The following is a brief status update on major FDOT road construction projects in Volusia and Flagler counties as of the April cutoff. The next cutoff date is May 21, 2017. Information is also available on www.cflroads.com.

Interstate Projects

· 408464-1-52-01 -- I-4 Widening – from SR 44 to East of I-95 o Contract: E5R16 o All travel lanes are open. o Last contract day is May 7 (as of 4/28/2017)

· 242715-2-52-01 -- I-95 Widening, I-4, US 92 System to System Interchange o Contract: E5W26 o Work Began: November 2014 o Estimated Completion: Spring 2018 o Demolition of old Spruce Creek bridges in progress. o Demolition of old bridge over SR 421 occurring May 1-5 o Traffic shifted at the I-4/I-95 interchange onto new ramps last week

· 432455-1-52-01 -- SR 400 / I-4 Resurfacing between St. John’s River Bridge and

Saxon Boulevard o Contract: T5542 o Work Began: February 2016 o Work substantially complete. Final striping underway this week

Other Current Projects:

· 434455-1-52-01 – SR 40 from Interchange Blvd. to I-95 SB ramp, turn lane improvements, including drainage improvements

o Contract: E5Y32 o Work Began: Nov. 7, 2016

100

o Paving completed. o This project has been accepted

· 430678-1-52-01 – Resurfacing US 1 from South Street in Oak Hill to Magnolia

Ave/Shangri-La Circle in Edgewater o Contract: T5563 o Work Began: August 2016 o Estimated Completion: Early 2018 o Contractor working on drainage and placing the new sidewalk. o Paving has resumed

· 437448-1-52-01 -- SR 46 Bridge Deck Overlay – Bridge No. 790030 over the St.

John’s River just east of Little Big Econ State Park o Contract: E5Y37 o Work Began: march 27, 2017 o The contractor is placing final striping May 5

· 436937-1-52-01 -- SR 40 (Granada Boulevard) Bridge Pier Repair – Bridge No.

790132 over the Halifax River. o Contract: E5Y33 o Work Began: March 27, 2017 o Estimated Completion: Late 2017 o Coffer dam construction was delayed. Expected to start in the next few weeks. o The channel will remain open

101

FDOT District 5 - DeLand Operations Office 1650 N. Kepler Road , DeLand, FL 32724

Phone (386) 740-3548 Fax (386) 736-5469 DeLand Operations Engineer Ron Meade, P.E

Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017

Outside Consultant

In-House Construction

Maintenance

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Archer Western Contractors LLC LET DATE: 9/05/2014 ORIGINAL: 1,100 $204,975,000.00

CCEI: Jacobs Engineering Group NTP: 11/25/2014 CURRENT: 1,290 $204,975,000.00

FED. AID #: 0954-140-1 TIME BEGAN: 11/25/2014 ELAPSED: 874 $131,022,399.42

FUND TYPE Federal WORK BEGAN: 11/25/2014 % ORIGINAL: 79.45% 63.92%

DBE Achieved 3.43% EST. COMPLETION: Spring 2018 % TO DATE: 67.75% 63.92%

Current CPPR: 100 LIQ. DAMAGES: 0

Robert Parker

CEI PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR David Bowden C: 407.873.1905 O: 386.333.9538 dbowden@go-iei.com

Catherine Abernethy

Jeff Hutchinson, P.E.

Eric Jones

Jaime Venegas

Bradley Bauknecht, P.E.

Tony Phillips

Jose Medina

Jim Read

Jeff Hutchinson, P.E.

Jason Roberts

FDOT PROJECT MANAGER: C: 386.290.6844 O: 386.740.3519 bradley.bauknecht@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER:

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 904.669.8931 O: 386.333.9575 jhutchinson@walshgroup.com

CONTRACTOR'S ASST PROJECT MANAGER C: 504.202.5340 O: 813.489.4128 eejones@walshgroup.com

CONTRACTOR'S ASST PROJECT MANAGER C: 817.721.5071 O: 386.333.9576 jvenegas@walshgroup.com

CEI SENIOR PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 904.449.0923 O: 386.333.9537 robert.parker@jacobs.com

MEETING SCHEUDLE: Tuesday 9:30 a.m., Field Office, 735 Fentress Blvd.

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 jim.read@dot.state.fl.us

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.669.8931 O: 386.333.9575 jhutchinson@walshgroup.com

SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 904.626.0076 O: 386.333.9537 tony.phillips@jacobs.com

SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 386.804.2403 O: 386.333.9537 jose.medina@jacobs.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.916.4439 O: 386.333.9575 jproberts@walshgroup.com

Volusia County

I-95, I-4, US 92 SYSTEM TO SYSTEM INTERCHANGE

242715-2-52-01

E5W26

DESIGN BUILD

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) C: 407.335.6390 O: 386.333.9537 catherine.abernethy@jacobs.com

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widening of I-95 from four to six lanes, complete reconstruction of the I-4/SR 400 and US 92 interchanges, reconstruction of Bellevue Bridge,

improvements to SR 400, US 92, Bellevue Road and Tomoka Farms Road

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Condotte / DeMoya Group LET DATE: 2/3/2012 ORIGINAL: 900 $134,462,000.00

CCEI: Parsons Brinkerhoff Inc. NTP: 5/9/2012 CURRENT: 1,818 $142,782,597.66

FED. AID #: 422501 TIME BEGAN: 5/9/2012 ELAPSED: 1,804 $140,680,965.98

FUND TYPE FAO WORK BEGAN: 5/9/2012 % ORIGINAL: 200.44% 104.63%

DBE Achieved 10.03% EST. COMPLETION: May 2017 % TO DATE: 99.23% 98.53%

Current CPPR: 96% LIQ. DAMAGES:

Steve Wigle, P.E.

Mike Atkins

Barry Johnson

Grant Cool

Brad Bauknecht, P.E.

Jay Johnson

Jim Read

Grant Cool

Wade Knowlton

C: 407.406.1218 matkins@metriceng.com

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 305.322.5597 O: 386.873.0770 grant.cool@demoya.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 305.338.8027

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 jim.read@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR:

Volusia County

I-4 WIDENING - SR 44 to East of I -95

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 305.322.5597 O: 386.873.0770 grant.cool@demoya.com

FDOT PROJECT MANAGER: C: 386.846.4149 Alt: 386.748.6502 bradley.bauknecht@dot.state.fl.us

EMAIL

CEI SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER C: 407.509.8541 wigle@pbworld.com

C: 407.947.7426 O: 386.873.0772 johnsonba@pbworld.comCEI PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR

408464-1-52-01

E5R16

DESIGN BUILD

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Interstate widening from four lanes to six lanes

CONTACT PHONE

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS)

C: 321.229.9821

MEETING SCHEUDLE: Thursday 1:30 p.m. at the Field Office 102

Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017

Outside Consultant

In-House Construction

Maintenance

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Ranger Construction Industries LET DATE: 10/28/2015 ORIGINAL: 260 $6,389,000.00

CCEI: Mehta and Associates Inc. NTP: 12/29/2015 CURRENT: 435 $6,567,625.98

FED. AID #: 0042 270 I TIME BEGAN: 2/27/2016 ELAPSED: 415 $6,069,231.64

FUND TYPE CLS WORK BEGAN: 2/27/2016 % ORIGINAL: 159.62% 95.00%

DBE Achieved 4.54% EST. COMPLETION: Spring 2017 % TO DATE: 95.40% 92.41%

Current CPPR 96 LIQ. DAMAGES:

Kerry Worrell, P.E.

Chris Kochis

Juan Arce

Terry Overcash

Glenn Raney

Anu Shah, P.E.

Alan Forget

Chris McKenzie

Jim Read

Juan Arce

Trent Dion

MEETING SCHEUDLE: Tuesdays 10:30 a.m., Mehta & Associates, 1 Purlieu Place, Suite 100, Winter Park

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 jim.read@dot.state.fl.us

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 407.948.4553 juan.arce@rangerconstruction.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.527.3436 trent.dion@rangerconstruction.com

SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER: O: 407.657.8662 C: 850.341.6114 ashah@mehtaeng.com

SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 321.377.5848 aforget@mehtaeng.com

RESIDENT ASPHALT SPECIALIST C: 386-290-9301 chrisopher.mckenzie@atkinsglobal.com

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 407.948.4553 juan.arce@rangerconstruction.com

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 863.559.1206 terry.overcash@rangerconstruction.co

FDOT PROJECT MANAGER: O: 386.740.3524 C: 386.846.4862 michael.raney@dot.state.fl.us

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

CEI SENIOR PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR O: 407.657.6662 C: 321.239.7308 kworrell@mehateng.com

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 407.754.6425 C: 386.690.9690 ckochis@mehtaeng.com

Volusia County

SR 400 (I-4) RESURFACING ST. JOHN'S RIVER BRIDGE TO SAXON BOULEVARD

432455-1-52-01

T5542

LUMP SUM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Milling and resurfacing of I-4 from east end of St. John's River Bridge to just west of Saxon Boulevard, including ramps at Exit 108

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: P&S Paving Inc. LET DATE: 6/15/2016 ORIGINAL: 480 $10,074,300.00

FED. AID #: 4857054P NTP: 8/11/2016 CURRENT: 513 $10,109,055.06

FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 8/15/2016 ELAPSED: 245 $4,803,534.29

DBE Achieved 1.20% WORK BEGAN: 8/15/2016 % ORIGINAL: 51.04% 47.68%

Current CPPR: 100 EST. COMPLETION: 12/30/2017 % TO DATE: 47.76% 47.52%

LIQ. DAMAGES:

Barry Johnson

Denise Druding

Brian Davidson

John Dunlap

Paul Wabi, P.E.

Jessy Heflin

Kamlesh Suthar

Jim Read

John Dunlap

Brian Davidson

VOLUSIA

SR 5/US 1 Resurfacing Oak Hill-Edgewater

430678-1-52-01

T5563

Construction Pay Item

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Resurfacing from South Street in Oak Hill to Magnolia Ave/Shangri-La Circle in Edgewater. Also includes new sidewalks, drainage and signal

improvements.

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 407.947.7426 johnsonba@pbworld.com

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3430 denise.druding@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 386.566.0551 bdavidson@pandspavinginc.com

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 386.214.8896 jd@pandspavinginc.com

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 paul.wabi@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 407.973.6510 jheflin@go-iei.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.566.0551 bdavidson@pandspavinginc.com

MEETING SCHEDULE:

ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR C: 863.399.0304 ksuthar@pics-llc.com

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 james.read@dot.state.fl.us

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.214.8896 jd@pandspavinginc.com

103

Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017

Outside Consultant

In-House Construction

Maintenance

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Blacktip Services Inc. LET DATE: 8/02/2016 ORIGINAL: 120 $622,133.25

FED. AID #: NTP: 10/07/2016 CURRENT: 178 $622,133.25

FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 11/4/2016 ELAPSED: 137 $522,278.03

DBE Achieved 0.81% WORK BEGAN: 11/7/2016 % ORIGINAL: 114.17% 83.95%

Current CPPR: 94 EST. COMPLETION: 4/27/2017 % TO DATE: 76.97% 83.95%

LIQ. DAMAGES:

Dwight Grube

Denise Druding

Billy Rose

Dusty Baumgartner

Paul Wabi, P.E.

Kristina Widup

Charles Woods

Billy Rose

Gina Spencer

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Cheyenne Associates Inc. LET DATE: 10/04/2016 ORIGINAL: 90 $862,770.36

FED. AID #: N/A NTP: 11/29/2016 CURRENT: 108 $862,770.36

FUND TYPE CPI TIME BEGAN: 1/3/2017 ELAPSED: 103 $710,982.33

DBE Achieved 0.00% WORK BEGAN: 1/9/2017 % ORIGINAL: 114.44% 82.41%

Current CPPR: 98 EST. COMPLETION: 4/30/2017 % TO DATE: 95.37% 82.41%

LIQ. DAMAGES:

Glenn Raney

Denise Druding

Jeff Hansen

Gary Wingate

Paul Wabi, P.E.

Paul Stacks

Jim Read

Gary Wingate

Jeff Hansen

VOLUSIA

SR 40 from Interchange Boulevard to I-95 South Ramp

434455-1-52-01

E5Y32

Construction Pay Item

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen and lengthen the right turn lane from SR 40 to the I-95 SB ramp

Work Complete - Update Pending Final Acceptance

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 386.846.4587 O: 386.740.3482 dwight.grube@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3430 denise.druding@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 954.303.4593 billy@blacktip.us

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 239.601.1536 dusty@blacktip.us

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 paul.wabi@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 561.385.6358 kristina.widup@rsandh.com

ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR

MEETING SCHEDULE:

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3541 C: 386.847.3700 charles.woods@dot.state.fl.us

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 954.303.4593 billy@blacktip.us

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 954.324.5300 blacktipemail@yahoo.com

FLAGLER

SR 20/100 Milling and Resurfacing from West of Bunnell to SR 5/US 1

432346-1-52-01

E5Y63

Construction Pay Item

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Mill and resurface SR 20/SR 100 from west of Bunnell City limits to SR 5/US 1 with minor safety upgrades.

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C:386.846.4862 O: 386.740.3524 michael.raney@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3430 denise.druding@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 708.254.5333 jhansen@cai-fl.com

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: O: 352.544.2723 C: 727.271.6441 gwingate@cai-fl.com

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 paul.wabi@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 863-243-9440 paul.stacks@aecom.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 708.254.5333 jhansen@cai-fl.com

MEETING SCHEDULE:

ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: C: 386.801.5584 O: 386.740.3406 james.read@dot.state.fl.us

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: O: 352.544.2723 C: 727.271.6441 gwingate@cai-fl.com

104

Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017

Outside Consultant

In-House Construction

Maintenance

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: CMA Corporation LET DATE: 9/07/2016 ORIGINAL: 250 $1,750,000.00

FED. AID #: NTP: 11/14/2016 CURRENT: 260 $1,750,000.00

FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 2/27/2017 ELAPSED: 49 $137,700.00

DBE Achieved 0.00% WORK BEGAN: 3/27/2017 % ORIGINAL: 19.60% 7.87%

Current CPPR: 98 EST. COMPLETION: 11/13/2017 % TO DATE: 18.85% 7.87%

LIQ. DAMAGES:

Rick Coe

Denise Druding

Armando Cardona Jr.

Robert Bell

Paul Wabi, P.E.

Chuck Crossman

Chris Eckert

Armando Cardona Jr.

Robert Bell

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Oceaneer Consulting LLC LET DATE: 12/06/2016 ORIGINAL: 85 $339,868.20

FED. AID #: N/A NTP: 2/15/2017 CURRENT: 103 $339,868.20

FUND TYPE CLS TIME BEGAN: 2/15/2017 ELAPSED: 62 $183,417.60

DBE Achieved 0.00% WORK BEGAN: 2/15/2017 % ORIGINAL: 72.94% 53.97%

Current CPPR: 98 EST. COMPLETION: 5/21/2017 % TO DATE: 60.19% 53.97%

LIQ. DAMAGES:

Glenn Raney

Ernie Saltar

Christian Villegas

Edwin Aponte

Paul Wabi, P.E.

Prince Dorvilus

N/A

Chris Eckert

Christian Villegas

Edwin AponteALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 954.328.3477

MEETING SCHEDULE: TBD

ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3463 C: 386.801.5505 chris.eckert@dot.state.fl.us

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 321.604.1371 christian@oceaneer.us

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 954.328.3477

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 paul.wabi@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 407.276.5810 pdorvilus@pics-llc.com

PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C:386.846.4862 O: 386.740.3524 michael.raney@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3416 ernesto.saltar@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 321.604.1371 christian@oceaneer.us

VOLUSIA

SR 46 Bridge Deck Epoxy/Flint Rock Overlay (Bridge No. 790030)

437448-1-52-01

E5Y37

Lump Sum Contract

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SR 46 bridge deck overlay of bridge #790030 over the St. John's River Bridge, with milling and resurfacing of east bridge approach

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

VOLUSIA

SR 40 (Granada Boulevard) Bridge Pier Repair over the Halifax River

436937-1-52-01

E5Y33

Construction Lump Sum

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Repairs to Pier 8 crash wall of bridge No. 790132 in Ormond Beach

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 386.527.3831 O: 386.740.3490 frederick.coe@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3430 denise.druding@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 786.586.0597 acardonajr@cmacorporation.net

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 305.923.0508

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 paul.wabi@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 407.907-4300 crossman@etminc.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 305.923.0508

MEETING SCHEDULE:

ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3463 C: 386.801.5505 chris.eckert@dot.state.fl.us

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 786.586.0597 acardonajr@cmacorporation.net

105

Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017

Outside Consultant

In-House Construction

Maintenance

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Evans Contracting Services Inc. LET DATE: 3/01/2016 ORIGINAL: 220 $1,831,436.50

FED. AID #: NTP: 5/10/2016 CURRENT: 399 $1,860,516.87

FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 5/24/2016 ELAPSED: 299 $1,385,194.47

DBE Achieved 0% WORK BEGAN: 5/24/2016 % ORIGINAL: 135.91% 75.63%

Current CFPR: 86 EST. COMPLETION: Summer 2017 % TO DATE: 74.94% 74.45%

LIQ. DAMAGES:

Ernie Saltar

Denise Druding

Clint McKee

Geoff Perry

Paul Wabi, P.E.

Mallie Hunt

Rick Snow

Geoff Perry

Clint McKee

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Evans Contracting Services Inc. LET DATE: 9/07/2016 ORIGINAL: 180 $1,077,875.00

FED. AID #: NTP: 11/06/2016 CURRENT: 209 $1,077,875.00

FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 11/20/2016 ELAPSED: 148 $557,471.00

DBE Achieved 0% WORK BEGAN: 11/21/2016 % ORIGINAL: 82.22% 51.72%

Current CFPR: 98 EST. COMPLETION: 6/16/2017 % TO DATE: 70.81% 51.72%

LIQ. DAMAGES:

Rick Coe

Denise Druding

Clint McKee

Sylvan Taylor

Paul Wabi, P.E.

Alan Forget

Charles Woods

Clint McKee

Brian Frey

MEETING SCHEDULE: Wednesdays as needed on site

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.485.0158 clint.evanscontracting@gmail.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.203.3147

SENIOR BRIDGE INSPECTOR (if applicable):

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3541 C: 386.847.3700 charles.woods@dot.state.fl.us

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 paul.wabi@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR: C: 321.377.5848 aforget@mehtaeng.com

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 904.485.0158 clint.evanscontracting@gmail.com

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 904.353.2486

PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 386.527.3831 O: 386.740.3490 frederick.coe@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST O: 386.740.3430 denise.druding@dot.state.fl.us

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Desilt, video and line drainage pipes, repair concrete inlet caps, between Nova Road and SR A1A.

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

VOLUSIA

SR 600/US 92 Pipe Lining and Repair

427986-1-72-12

E5T89

Maintenance Pay Item

VOLUSIA

SR 441 (S. Peninsula Drive) Pipe Lining and Repair

427986-1-72-10

E5T55

Maintenance Pay Item

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Desilt, video and line drainage pipes, repair concrete inlet caps, replace drainage pipe US 92 and SR A1A

Maintenance Contract - Update as of March invoice

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR O: 386.740.3416 ernesto.saltar@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST O: 386.740.3430 denise.druding@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 904.485.0158 clint.evanscontracting@gmail.com

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 904.588.4302 geoffperry1955@gmail.com

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 paul.wabi@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR: C: 407.509.2042 mhunt@pics-llc.com

SENIOR BRIDGE INSPECTOR (if applicable):

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3414 rick.snow@dot.state.fl.us

MEETING SCHEDULE: Wednesdays as needed on site

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.588.4302 geoffperry1955@gmail.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.485.0158 clint.evanscontracting@gmail.com

106

Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017

Outside Consultant

In-House Construction

Maintenance

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Shen-Line, LLC LET DATE: 10/04/2016 ORIGINAL: 180 $1,008,407.50

FED. AID #: NTP: 11/20/2016 CURRENT: 207 $1,008,407.50

FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 12/4/2016 ELAPSED: 134 $243,484.20

DBE Achieved 0% WORK BEGAN: 2/13/2017 % ORIGINAL: 74.44% 24.15%

Current CFPR: 96 EST. COMPLETION: 6/28/2017 % TO DATE: 64.73% 24.15%

LIQ. DAMAGES:

Rick Coe

Denise Druding

Louis Woska

Garrett Kulp

Paul Wabi, P.E.

TBD

Charles Woods

Louis Woska

Clint McKee

FIN #

CONTRACT #

TIME COST

CONTRACTOR: Envirowaste Services Group, Inc. LET DATE: 12/06/2016 ORIGINAL: 215 $1,085,190.00

FED. AID #: N/A NTP: 2/12/2017 CURRENT: 226 $1,085,190.00

FUND TYPE TIME BEGAN: 2/26/2017 ELAPSED: 22 $158,555.90

DBE Achieved 0% WORK BEGAN: 2/27/2017 % ORIGINAL: 10.23% 14.61%

Current CPPR: 100 EST. COMPLETION: 10/92017 % TO DATE: 9.73% 14.61%

LIQ. DAMAGES:

Rick Coe

Ernie Saltar

Cathy Oliphant

Cesar Maldonado

Paul Wabi, P.E.

Tom Barry

Charles Woods

Cesar Maldonado

Cathy Oliphant

MEETING SCHEDULE: Wednesdays as needed on site

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 386.479.8318 l.woska@shenandoahconstruction.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 904.485.0158 clint.evanscontracting@gmail.com

VOLUSIA

Pipe Cleaning, Lining, Repair and Video Inspection - Various Roads, Volusia County

429179-1-72-04

E5T90

Maintenance Pay Item

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Storm drain desilting, video inspection, lining and replacement on SR 15A, SR 5A, SR 430 and SR 44

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR

SENIOR BRIDGE INSPECTOR (if applicable):

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3541 C: 386.847.3700 charles.woods@dot.state.fl.us

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 paul.wabi@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR:

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 386.479.8318

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT:

PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR C: 386.527.3831 O: 386.740.3490 frederick.coe@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST O: 386.740.3430 denise.druding@dot.state.fl.us

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Desilt, video and line drainage pipes, repair concrete inlet caps, between US 92 and Beresford Avenue

CONTACT PHONE EMAIL

VOLUSIA

US 17/92 Pipe Cleaning, Lining and Video Inspection

427986-1-72-11

E5T88

Maintenance Pay Item

C: 386.527.3831 O: 386.740.3490 frederick.coe@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST (CSS) O: 386.740.3416 ernesto.saltar@dot.state.fl.us

CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT MANAGER: C: 407.276.0517 cathy.oliphantesg@gmail.com

CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT: C: 813.270.0132 cesar.maldonado@envirowastesg.com

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C: 386.279.5504 O: 386.740.3594 paul.wabi@dot.state.fl.us

SENIOR INSPECTOR: C: 561.301.4509 tbarry@mehtaeng.com

ALT. 24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 407.276.0517 cathy.oliphantesg@gmail.com

MEETING SCHEDULE:

ADD'L SENIOR INSPECTOR

MAINTENANCE CONTACT: O: 386.740.3541 C: 386.847.3700 charles.woods@dot.state.fl.us

24 HR CONTRACTOR EMERGENCY CONTACT: C: 813.270.0132 cesar.maldonado@envirowastesg.com

107

Project Status Report as of April 21, 2017

Outside Consultant

In-House Construction

Maintenance

LANDSCAPE PROJECTS CURRENTLY IN ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD

FIN # 435469-2-52-01 Contract Days: 951

CONTRACT # E5Y26

FIN # 435469-3-52-01 Contract Days: 907

CONTRACT # E5Y19

FIN # 435469-1-52-01 Contract Days: 876

CONTRACT # E5W92

VOLUSIA

I-4 / SR 44 Interchange Landscaping

Days Elapsed: 171

Present Amount: $798,477.26 Paid to Date: $630,715.22

VOLUSIA

I-95/US 1 Interchange Landscaping

Days Elapsed: 158

Present Amount: $907,950.50 Paid to Date: $811,351.80

VOLUSIA

I-4 / Saxon Boulevard Interchange Landscaping

Present Amount: $827,000 Paid to Date: $620,920

Days Elapsed: 205

108

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

V. PRESENTATIONS, STATUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS E. VOLUSIA AND FLAGLER COUNTY CONSTRUCTION REPORTS Background Information: The staff from Volusia County Traffic Engineering and Flagler County Traffic Engineering will present an update on the county projects that are either under construction or close to being ready for construction. The Volusia County Construction Report and the Flagler County Construction Report are provided for your review. The Flagler County Construction Report will be provided under separate cover. ACTION REQUESTED: NO ACTION REQUIRED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE

109

Volusia County Construction Report – APRIL 2017* Recently Completed within the last 6 months: 1) ECRRT - Segment 6 Trail (Cow Creek to Dale St.) 2) Spring to Spring Trail (Blue Springs Park to Detroit Terrace) 3) Pioneer Trail Curve Realignment at Turnbull Bay Rd. 4) Beville Road/Airport Business Park (Pelican Bay) Signal (includes fire preemption) 5) Doyle Rd. (Courtland Bl. to SR 415) – Paved shoulders 6) Howland Blvd. 4-lane widening (Courtland Bl. to SR 415) 7) S. Williamson Blvd. Ext. 4-lane widening (Pioneer Tr. to Airport Rd.) 8) Plymouth Ave. Sidewalk (from E. of Hazen Rd. to W. of SR 15A) 9) Atlantic Ave. Sidewalk (Major Ave. to Marcelle Ave.) Under Construction or Advertised for Construction: 1) Veterans Memorial Bridge (Orange Ave.) – Under construction 2) LPGA Blvd 4-lane widening (Jimmy Ann Dr. to Derbyshire)– Under construction 3) Turnbull Bay Bridge – Contract Awarded 4) Doyle Road paved shoulders (Providence Blvd to Saxon Blvd) – Under Construction 5) Spring to Spring Trail - Grand Ave. (Lemon St. to King St.) – Under Construction 6) ECRRT Segment 5 (Brevard County Line to Cow Creek Rd.) – Design/Build – Under Construction

Near Construction Projects:

Design Projects: 1) ECRRT – Segment 4B (Gobblers Lodge to Maytown Spur) – Design/Build - Design underway 2) Tenth St 4-lane widening (Myrtle to US 1) – Waiting for Railroad and interlocal agreements. 3) ECRRT – Segment 4A (Guise Rd. to Gobblers Lodge) - ROW LAP funded 2013/14, Const. 2017/18 4) Spring to Spring Trail Segment 3A (Detroit Terrace to Rob Sullivan Park) – Design funded 2016/17,

Construction FY 2017/18 5) Spring to Spring Trail- Segment 3B (Rob Sullivan Park to Dirksen Dr) – Design funded 2016/17,

Construction FY 2018/19 6) Orange Camp Rd. 4-lane widening (MLK Blvd. to I-4) – Design 2016/17. Construction funded in FY

2018/2019 7) Old New York paved shoulders (from Shell Rd. to SR 44) – Construction funded FY 20/21 8) Beresford Ave 2-lane Extension (Blue Lake to MLK) 9) W. Park Avenue 3-lane widening (Dale Street to Old Mission Rd) – Design underway 10) Howland Blvd 4-lane widening (Providence Blvd to Elkcam Blvd) –Design Funded FY 2016/17 11) Spring to Spring (DeLeon Springs gap) – Design Funded FY 2016/17 12) Spring to Spring (Lake Beresford to Grand Avenue) – PD&E study –Funded FY 2016/17 13) Doyle Road paved shoulders (Twisted Oak to Courtland Blvd) – Design Funded FY 2016/17,

Construction unfunded 14) Turnbull Bay Road paved shoulders – Construction funded FY 2018/19 15) Doyle Road paved shoulders (Lush Lane to Courtland Blvd) – Construction funded FY 2017/18

*Changes/Updates since last report are underlined. Note: Dates are subject to change due to normal project development issues. Please see Volusia County's road program at http://www.volusia.org/publicworks/ for more information.

110

FLAGLER COUNTY CONSRUCTION REPORTAS OF MAY 2017

Completed 1 Matanzas Woods Parkway Interchange at Interstate 952 Old Kings Road Extension Forest Grove Drive to Matanzas Parkway 3 Flagler County Jail Improvements4 Flagler County Sheriff's Operation Center5 Varn Park Improvements6 Replacement of Three Box Culverts along County Road 3057 Roberts Road Bike/ Pedestrian Path8 County Road 305 Bridge Replacement # 7340869 Bunnell Elementary Trails

10 John Anderson Widening and Resurfacing11 Palm Coast Parkway 6 Laning (Boulder Rock Drive to Florida Park Drive)12 County Road 302 Resurfacing from County Road 305 to SR 10013 Florida Agricultural Museum Improvements

Construction Phase and Near Construction1 Old Kings Road South Widening and Resurfacing from SR 100 to Volusia County Line2 County Road 2009 Design & Construction Resurfacing from County Road 305 to Lake Disston3 SR A1A Landscaping4 County Road 13 - Widening and Resurfacing from County Road 205 to US 15 County Road 205 Design for Widening and Resurfacing from SR 100 to County Road 13 - Design Completed6 Dune Restoration 7 Princess Place - Island House Bridge8 Plantation Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility

Design Phase1 County Road 305 Widening and Resurfacing from bridge # 734006 to SR 1002 County Road 305 Widening and Resurfacing from bridge # 734086 to 7340843 Old Dixie Highway Widening and Resurfacing4 Mahogany Blvd. Resurfacing5 North Mala Compra Drainage Basin Improvements 6 Colbert Lane7 Briarwood Drive8 County Road 2006 Resurfacing9 Bay Drive Park

Planning Phase1 County Road 304 Resurfacing from County Road 305 to SR5 (US1)2 Durrance Lane from Shedd lane to Flagler County line3 Old Haw Creek from County Road 304 to SR 114 Old Kings Road Box Culverts5 Otis Stone from County Road 13 to US 16 Water Oak Road from County Road 2006 to Mahogany Blvd.

111

MEETING SUMMARY CAC & TCC

MAY 16, 2017

VI. STAFF COMMENTS ® Update on SunRail ® Update on the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study

VII. CAC/TCC MEMBER COMMENTS

VIII. INFORMATION ITEMS ® April 26, 2017 River to Sea TPO Board Meeting Summary ® April 2017 TPO Outreach and Events ® National Trails Day Flyer

IX. ADJOURNMENT

________________________________________________________________________________________

***The next meetings of the CAC & TCC will be on June 20, 2017*** ________________________________________________________________________________________

112

River to Sea TPO Board

Meeting Summary April 26, 2017

• Approved the consent agenda items as amended including the approval of the March 22, 2017 TPO Board meeting minutes, approval of expenditure for the Alternative Intersection Design report for the SR 44 and Mission Drive/Wallace Road/Canal Street Feasibility Study and approval of expenditure for the development of a fixed route service implementation plan for Flagler County

• Approved a request from Volusia County to increase funding for the construction phase of the Doyle Road paved shoulders project

• Approved a request from South Daytona to increase funding for the construction phase of the Big Tree Road Shared Use Path

• Received a TPO staff presentation of the draft R2CTPO’s Title VI and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plans

• Received a PowerPoint presentation on the updates to the Florida Greenways and Trail System (FGTS) Plan and the Opportunity and Priority maps

• Received a TPO staff presentation on the project applications received from the annual Call for Projects

• Received a PowerPoint presentation of Pedestrian Crash Statistics

• Received a PowerPoint presentation of Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge/Resiliency Study

• Received a PowerPoint presentation of the Flagler Bicycle and Pedestrian School Safety Review Studies (Part 2)

• Received the FDOT report

• Received the Executive Director’s report providing an update the I-95 to SR 417 Connector Environmental Study; additional updates to be sent in follow up email

• Received board member comment reminding members that comments on the Bus Stop Improvement Plan are due April 28, 2017

113

Items Requiring Follow Up:

• Executive Director to send the report from Mr. Mighk Wilson, MetroPlan Orlando, on pedestrian

crashes that he presented at the Central Florida MPO Alliance meeting last week

• Executive Director to send follow up email detailing items not covered under Executive Director comments

The next River to Sea TPO Board meeting will be on Wednesday, May 24, 2017

114

TPO Outreach & Activities Completed in April 2017

TPO Presentation to the ISB Coalition

Date: Monday, April 24, 2017 Location: MetroPlan Orlando Description: TPO staff gave a presentation to the ISB Coalition on Transportation and Tourism

Announcement: The TPO's draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Maps are available for public review and comment on the TPO's website at:

http://www.r2ctpo.org/bicycle-pedestrian-program/draft-bicycle-pedestrian-plan/

MPO Advisory Council (MPOAC) Meeting

Date: Thursday, April 6, 2017 Location: Cocoa Beach Description: TPO staff attended the MPO Advisory Council meeting

Central Florida MPO Alliance (CFMPOA) Meeting

Date: Friday, April 21, 2017 Location: MetroPlan Orlando

Description: TPO staff attended the Central Florida MPO Alliance meeting

Earth Day Press Release

Date: Saturday, April 22, 2017 Description: The TPO issued a press release in recognition of Earth Day 2017

River to Sea TPO Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Public Workshops:

May 10: River to Sea TPO Conference Room, 5:00 – 6:30 p.m.

May 11: Palm Coast City Hall, Council Chambers, 5:00 – 6:30 p.m.

May 12: Volusia County Administration Center, 1st Floor Training Room, 5:00 – 6:30 p.m.

June 3: National Trails Day – TPO Bicycle Helmet Fitting, Lake Beresford Park

June 16: CFMPOA Meeting (Joint meeting with the West Florida Chairs Coordinating Committee), MetroPlan Orlando

June/July: Dates TBD: Volusia County Summer School Helmet Fittings

July 17-18: Flagler County Summer School Program Helmet Fittings, Flagler County

· Update of the TPO’s Citizens Guide to the R2CTPO · Storm Surge Vulnerability/Resiliency Assessment · Flagler Bicycle/Pedestrian School Safety Review

Studies · Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan · General Planning Consultant (GPC) Consultant

Selection · Thompson Creek Trail Feasibility Study · Crash Analysis Report · Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Masterplan

Phase 2 Consultant Selection · Development of TPO Priority Project Lists · SR 44 @Mission Rd/Wallace Rd/Canal St Alternative

Intersection Analysis Design Study · Update to the TPO Title VI and Limited English

Proficiency (LEP) Plans · Website Upgrade and Ongoing Support Services

Consultant Selection · Development of the FY 2017/18 – 2021/22

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

115

May 12, 2017 Media contact: Pat Kuehn, CPRC Community Information Specialist 386-822-5062, ext. 12934 Lake Beresford Park hosts Trails Day celebration

Get your heart pumping and your feet moving as you celebrate Volusia County’s growing trails system on National Trails Day, Saturday, June 3. Volusia County’s Parks, Recreation and Culture Division will sponsor an outdoor family event from 9 a.m. to noon at Lake Beresford Park, 2100 Fatio Road, DeLand. The celebration will be set up near the trailhead to park’s 1.8-mile multi-use trail and the county’s Spring-to-Spring Trail. County staff will lead a guided nature hike and walking tour through the picturesque park, while the River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization will give away free children’s bicycle helmets. Vendors and local environmental organizations will have informational displays.

National Trails Day is promoted by the American Hiking Society to promote the importance of trails in the United States. The county’s major trail systems are the Spring-to-Spring Trail and the East Central Regional Rail Trail. When finished, the Spring-to-Spring Trail will stretch 26 miles from DeLeon Springs State Park to Gemini Springs Park, and the Rail Trail will cover 52 miles from Deltona to Edgewater with a 10-mile leg to Titusville. Once the links are completed, the trails will become part of the five-county St. Johns River-to-Sea Loop. For more information about Trails Day, call 386-736-5953. Learn more about the county’s trails system at www.volusia.org/trails. - 30 -

116

117