CABRAL NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION AND SAFETY …acerail.com/wp-content/uploads/Friday-August-5... · 2016. 8. 5. · Cabral Station Neighborhood Revitalization Plan (2005, 2008):

ITEM 5Presentations by Staff regarding Plans for the Cabral Neighborhood Revitalization and Safety Improvements and Representatives of Ten Space regarding the Open Window Development Project in Downtown Stockton, which include Portions of the Cabral Neighborhood

CABRAL NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS

SJRRC has been actively pursuing revitalization of the Cabral Station area for years. SJRRC efforts include two land-use/revitalization related plans

for Cabral Station Areao “The Robert J. Cabral Station Neighborhood: A Plan for

Revitalizing East Downtown Stockton” (2005, 2008)o “ACE Planning and Parking Strategy” (2011)


SJRRC staff pursuing parking expansion of approximately 200 spaces at the site of old Western Pacific Station (which will be demolished soon due to a major fire). Staff included this project in

the recent TIRCP grant application. Staff is exploring the

possibility of partnering with a developer to provide the public parking as part of mixed-use development.

Old WP Station Site

CabralStation


Downtown Stockton recently approved the Open Window Project, a large development proposal by local developer Ten Space.

Ten Space is here today to present details on their urban infill project that will also encourage Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and ACE ridership given the project’s proximity to the ACE station.

The Open Window Project is a major revitalization and redevelopment effort in the Cabral Station Neighborhood Area.


Currently many existing and potential riders perceive the area surrounding the Cabral Station as unsafe. Blighted and abandoned buildings present real safety

concerns. To date, there has been a lack of private sector investment in

Downtown Stockton in the area near Cabral Station. The SJRRC’s partnership in the Open Window Project is

proposed to help address these issues by providing funding support for site preparation (including removal of abandoned buildings, backfilling and grading), which will improve safety while also expediting revitalization and redevelopment efforts.


Cabral Station Neighborhood Revitalization Plan (2005, 2008): "The Rail Commission should partner with the City, local

non-profit agencies, and private developers to encourage infill residential along Miner Avenue.” 2005, pg. 3-24

“Becoming directly involved in the development of the parcels around its station is in ACE’s interest. The underutilized parcels create indirect but major costs for ACE, by increasing both real and perceived personal security problems and thereby discouraging ridership.” 2008, pg. 26


ACE Planning and Parking Strategy (2011): “Another key role often associated with public agencies

is undertaking or facilitating infrastructure improvements that are needed to support TOD projects. Increasingly, public agencies recognize that making development sites “shovel ready” for their development partners enhances value.” pg. 2.48

The Open Window Project is a comprehensive, mixed-use Master Development Plan for nearly 12 acres controlled by Ten Space in Downtown Stockton which will allow for over 1,000 residential units, 400,000 square feet of commercial

CabralStation

Thank you!

For more info visit tenspacedev.com

ITEM 6Approve Letters Supporting Transportation-Related Sales Tax Measures in Santa Clara, Stanislaus, and Merced Counties and Authorize the Chair to Sign the Letters of Support

SALES TAX MEASURES LETTERS OF SUPPORT

The Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG), and Merced County Association of Governments (Merced CAG) are each trying to pass transportation sales tax measures November 2016.

The VTA measure has capital funding for improvements on the Caltrain line used by ACE service between Santa Clara and San Jose that are needed for future ACE expansion.

The StanCOG and Merced CAG measures have a component for rail/transit which could be used to enhance ACE connectivity to local and regional transit and could be used to help fund ACE operations in these counties if ACE is extended.

SALES TAX MEASURES LETTERS OF SUPPORT

Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact.

Recommendation: Approve letters supporting transportation-related sales tax

measures in Santa Clara, Stanislaus, and Merced Counties.

ITEM 7Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Approving the “Early Action” Projects Associated with the ACEforward Program and Authorize and Direct the Executive Directorto Execute all Documents Related to the Notices

ITEM 8Presentation on ACEforward BART Connection Alternatives

ACEforward Project Goals

Tri-ValleyBART Connection

Union CityBART Connection

2

ACEforward Ridership Forecast – Merced ExtensionJuly 2016

No-build ridership forecast to increase by more than 25% by 2025

The highest long-term annual ridership could be up to 5.15 million riders, an increase of more than 280% compared to today’s usage

1.33

2.25

5.9

3

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

2015 2020 2025

No Build(NoExtension)

6 DailyRound Trips(Extend toModesto)

10 DailyRound Trips(Extend toMerced)

1.33

2.25

5.15

Annu

al R

ider

s

Altamont Corridor Improvements

Section Project Cost($-MM 2014)

# of miles $ / mile($-MM 2014)

Extension to Modesto• San Joaquin County (1)

• Stanislaus County$102.8$96.2

9.79.1

$10.6$10.6

5th & 6th Train Capital Cost (2) $202.0 n/a n/a

5th & 6th Train Equipment $60.5 n/a n/aStation Improvements to Support 5th & 6th Train• Parking• Platform Extensions

$59.8$14.4

n/an/a

n/an/a

Extension to Merced• Stanislaus County (3)

• Merced County$122.5$227.2

12.625.9

$9.7$8.8

7th – 10th Train Capital Cost (4) $200.0 n/a n/a7th – 10th Train Equipment $117.5 n/a n/aTOTAL $1202.9

1 – Extension to Ripon 3 – Extension to Turlock2 – Capacity and grade crossing improvements Stockton – San Jose section 4 – Capacity improvements Stockton – San Jose section

& maintenance facility expansion4

Tri Valley and BART Connectivity

5

Existing Shuttle Connection

Existing Shuttle Connections

Trip # Transfers

Travel Time (2025)

# Daily Round Trips (2025)

Tracy-San Francisco 2 1:45 10

Tracy-Great America 0 1:10 10

Ridership for 2025

4.56 million

Capital Cost

ACE - $1.20 billion

6

2. BART Connection at Greenville

BART Extension to Greenville Rd

Capital Cost

ACE - $1.20 billion

BART - $3.27 billion (12.0 mi)

7

Trip # Transfers

Travel Time (2025)




Ridership for 2025

5.15 million

3. BART Connection at Vasco

BART Extension to Vasco Rd via Downtown Livermore

Capital Cost

ACE - $1.20 billion

BART - $4.05 – 4.28 billion(10.0 mi)

8

Trip # Transfers

Travel Time (2025)




Ridership for 2025

5.07 million

4. BART Connection at Downtown

BART Extension to Vasco Rd w/ Downtown Livermore Intermodal

Capital Cost

ACE - $1.20 billion

BART - $4.05 – 4.28 billion(10.0 mi)

9

Trip # Transfers

Travel Time (2025)




Ridership for 2025

5.07 million

5a. ACE Extension to BART at Isabel6 trains between Merced and Isabel, 4 Stockton – San Jose

BART Extension to Isabel / I-580 ACE Extension to Isabel / I-580

Capital Cost (without Isabel extension)

Additional Cost(with Isabel extension:aerial – at-grade)

Total

ACE $0.75 billion $0.71 – 1.23 billion $1.46 – 1.98

BART $1.25 billion (5.0 mi)

10

Trip # Transfers Travel Time (2025)

# DailyRound Trips (2025)



Ridership for 2025

3.59 million

5b. ACE Extension to BART at Isabel 6 trains Merced – Isabel – San Jose, 4 Stockton – San Jose

BART Extension to Isabel / I-580 ACE Extension to Isabel / I-580

Capital Cost (without Isabelextension)

Additional Cost(with Isabel extension:aerial – at-grade)

Total



11




Tracy-Great America 0backtrack

1:101:40

46

Ridership for 2025

4.55 million

6. BART Connection via DMU to Isabel

BART Extension to Isabel / I-580DMU Shuttle between Greenville and Isabel / I-580

Capital Cost

ACE $1.20 billion

DMU $0.63 billion


12





Ridership for 2025

4.89 million

7a. ACE Extension to BART at Dublin/Pleasanton6 trains between Merced and Dublin/Pleasanton, 4 Stockton – San Jose

ACE Extension to Dublin/Pleasanton BART

14





Capital Cost (without Dublin-Pleasanton extension)

Additional Cost(with Dublin/P. extension:aerial – at-grade)

Total


BART n/a

Ridership for 2025

3.36 million

7b. ACE Extension to BART at Dublin/Pleasanton6 trains Merced – Dublin/Pleasanton – San Jose, 4 Stockton – San Jose

ACE Extension to Dublin/Pleasanton BART

15





1:101:48

46

Capital Cost (without Dublin-Pleasanton extension)

Additional Cost(with Dublin/P. extension:aerial – at-grade)

Total


BART n/a

Ridership for 2025

4.10 million

8. BART Connection via DMU to Dublin/Pleasanton

DMU Shuttle between Greenville and Dublin/Pleasanton BART

16





Capital Cost

ACE $1.20 billion

DMU $1.08 billion

BART n/a

Ridership for 2025

4.89 million

9. Shuttle Connection at Isabel BART

BART Extension & Bus Connection

Capital Cost

ACE - $1.20 billion

BART - $1.25 billion (5.0 mi)

18

Trip # Transfers

Travel Time (2025)




Ridership for 2025

4.56 million

Summary of Tri-Valley ACE-BART Connection Options

ACERidership(millions)

ACECost

(billions)

DMU Cost

(billions)

BARTCost

(billions)

Existing Shuttle Connection 4.56 $1.20 n/a n/a

BART Connection at Greenville 5.15 $1.20 n/a $3.27

BART Connection at Vasco 5.07 $1.20 n/a $4.05 – 4.28

BART Connection at Downtown 5.07 $1.20 n/a $4.05 – 4.28

ACE Extension to Isabel BART- 6 trains Merced – Isabel, 4 Stockton – San Jose- 6 Merced – Isabel – San Jose, 4 Stockton - SJ

3.594.55

$1.46 - 1.98$1.91 - 2.43

n/a $1.25

BART Connection via DMU to Isabel 4.89 $1.20 $0.63 $1.25

ACE Extension to Dublin/Pleasanton BART- 6 trains Merced – Dublin/P., 4 Stockton – San Jose- 6 trains Merced – D/P – San Jose, 4 Stockton - SJ

3.364.10

$1.89 - 3.13$2.34 - 3.58

n/a n/a

BART Connection via DMU to Dublin/Pleasanton 4.89 $1.20 $1.08 n/a

Shuttle Connection at BART Isabel 4.56 $1.20 n/a $1.25

19

ACEforward Altamont Pass – StocktonExisting and Potential Alignmentswith Alameda County-Owned Former SPRR

Trip # Transfers Travel Time (2025) # Daily Round Trips (2025)



Capital Cost (without Union City Extension)

AdditionalCost (with Union City Extension)

Total

$1.20 billion $0.02 billion $1.22

ACE Extension to BART at Union City6 trains between Merced and Union City, 4 Stockton – San Jose

21

Ridership for 2025

3.34 million

ACE Extension to BART at Union City6 trains Merced – Union City – San Jose, 4 Stockton – San Jose

22

Capital Cost (without Union City Extension)

AdditionalCost (with Union City Extension)

Total

$1.20 billion $0.02 billion $1.22




1:101:32

46

Ridership for 2025

4.16 million

BART Connection via DMU to Union City

23




Capital Cost

ACE $1.20 billion

DMU $0.10 billion

Ridership for 2025

4.66 million

Summary of Tri-Valley and Union City ACE-BART Connection Options

24

ACERidership(millions)

ACECost

(billions)

DMU Cost

(billions)

BARTCost

(billions)Existing Shuttle ConnectionShuttle Connection at Isabel BART* 4.56 $1.20 n/a $1.25*

BART Connection at Greenville 5.15 $1.20 n/a $3.27

BART Connection at Vasco or Downtown 5.07 $1.20 n/a $4.05 – 4.28

ACE Extension to Isabel BART- 6 trains Merced – Isabel, 4 Stockton – San Jose- 6 Merced – Isabel – San Jose, 4 Stockton - SJ

3.594.55

$1.46 - 1.98$1.91 - 2.43

n/a $1.25

BART Connection via DMU to Isabel 4.89 $1.20 $0.63 $1.25

ACE Extension to Dublin/Pleasanton BART- 6 trains Merced – Dublin/P., 4 Stockton – San Jose- 6 trains Merced – D/P – San Jose, 4 Stockton - SJ

3.364.10

$1.89 - 3.13$2.34 - 3.58

n/a n/a

BART Connection via DMU to Dublin/Pleasanton 4.89 $1.20 $1.08 n/a

ACE Extension to Union City BART- 6 trains Merced – Union City, 4 Stockton – SJ- 6 trains Merced – Union City – SJ, 4 Stockton - SJ

3.344.16

$1.22$1.22

n/a n/a

BART Connection via DMU to Union City 4.66 $1.20 $0.10 n/a