CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    1/32

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    2/32

    Agenda

    Enterprise Benchmarks HCM

    North American Payroll 8.9

    Campus Solutions DIL 8.9

    Campus Solutions 8.9

    HR Self Service 8.9 GP France 8.9 with 2 year history

    GP France 8.9 with 1 year history

    EPM

    FMS SCM

    References

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    3/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    North American Payroll 8.9

    Component Configuration

    Hardware(IBM z990)

    6 x IBM z990 Gen 1 Processors32 Gigabytes of Memory

    Storage IBM Total Storage DS8300 Enterprise

    Storage Server 2107-922

    O/S IBM z/OS version 1.4

    Database IBM DB2 for z/OS 8.1 (New Function Mode)

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    4/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    North American Payroll 8.9

    Employee Demographics

    120,000 paid employees

    132,000 paychecks calculated and produced

    4 Pay groups based on pay-cycles of weekly, bi-weekly, semi-monthly and monthly intervals

    Weekly, bi-weekly and semi-monthly pay groups include bothhourly and salaried employees

    Employees with multiple jobs within the same pay group are paidon a single check.

    Batch Processes

    Paysheet Creation 8 Concurrent Job Streams

    Payroll Calculation 8 Sequential Job Streams

    Payroll Confirmation 8 Concurrent Job Streams

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    5/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    North American Payroll 8.9

    Employees Paid Concurrent Total Process Run Time

    (120,000) Processes

    Paysheet Creation 8 x 1 1.7 min

    Payroll Calculation 1 x 8 116.8 min

    Payroll Confirmation 8 x 1 11.6 min

    Total Runtime - 130.1 min

    Checks Per Hour - 60,876

    Employees Per Hour - 55,342

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    6/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    Campus Solutions DIL 8.9 (4000 users)

    Server Configuration

    Database

    (HP rx8620)

    8 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium2 Processors /

    16 GB Memory

    Application

    (5 HP Proliant

    BL20p G2 Blade)

    2 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 3

    GB Memory

    Web(HP Proliant BL20p

    G2 Blade)

    2 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 3GB Memory

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    7/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM Campus Solutions DIL 8.9 (4000 users)

    Average Response times Logon Around 0.69 sec

    Page Load Around 1 sec

    Save Around 1.6 sec

    Batch Throughput

    Process Refund 3158 Students/Hr

    Process Test Scores 5806 Students/Hr

    Online Transactions

    Add Class Load Student Center

    Calculate Tuition Make Payment

    Drop Class Schedule Plan

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    8/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    Campus Solutions 8.9 (4000 users)

    OAS versus Web Logic versus Web Sphere

    Server Configuration

    Database

    (HP rx8620)

    8 x 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 16

    GB Memory

    Application

    (5 HP Proliant

    BL20p G2 Blade)

    2 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 3

    GB Memory

    Web(HP Proliant BL20p

    G2 Blade)

    1 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 3GB Memory

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    9/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    Campus Solutions 8.9 (4000 users)

    OAS versus Web Logic versus Web Sphere

    Transaction Name

    (Online)

    OAS

    (sec)

    Web Logic

    (sec)

    Web Sphere

    (sec)Average Logon 0.96 1.11 1.00

    Average Load Student

    Center

    1.29 1.34 1.57

    Average Page Load 1.07 1.05 1.15

    Average Page Save 1.83 1.83 1.97

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    10/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    Campus Solutions 8.9 (4000 users)

    OAS versus Web Logic versus Web Sphere

    Web CPU

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    OAS WebLogic WebSphere

    CPUUtilization

    Web CPU

    Web Memory

    2900.00

    3000.00

    3100.00

    3200.00

    3300.003400.00

    3500.00

    3600.00

    3700.00

    3800.00

    OAS WebLogic WebSphere

    Memory

    (MB)

    Web Memory

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    11/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    HR Self Service 8.9 (4000 Users)

    Server Configuration

    Database

    (IBM P570)

    4 x 1.9 GHz Power 5 Processors / 60

    GB Memory

    Application/Web(IBM P570)

    12 x 1.9 GHz Power 5 Processors / 40GB Memory

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    12/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM HR Self Service 8.9 (4000 users)

    Transaction Name (Online) Avg. Save/Search (sec)

    A1 - Add a Person 0.369

    A2 - Hire a Person 1.046

    A3 - Add Job 1.959

    E1 Update Home Address 0.65

    E2

    Update Phone Number 0.65E3 View Benefits Summary 0.816

    E4 Update Beneficiary 0.887

    E5 View Paycheck 1.266

    E6 Update Direct Deposit 0.16

    M1

    View Employees 0.233

    M2 Initiate Termination 0.221

    M3 Initiate Promotion 0.371

    M4 Initiate Employee Salary Chg 1.979

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    13/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    Global Payroll France 8.9 (2 Years History)

    Server Configuration

    Database(Sun Fire E25k)

    18 x 1.5 GHz Ultra Sparc IV+ Dual coreProcessors / 160 GB Memory

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    14/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    Global Payroll France 8.9 (2 Years History)

    Process Name

    (Batch)

    No Retro

    Payees/Hour

    Retro

    Payees/Hour

    Identify Parallel (54) 3,000,000 1,125,000

    Calculate

    Parallel (54) 112,500 75,630Finalize - Serial 9,000,000 4,500,000

    Payslip Parallel (54) 500,000 115,385

    Banking Preparation

    Parallel (54)

    1,800,000 1,000,000

    Banking Preparation France

    Serial

    1,125,000 818,182

    Banking EFT Serial 2,250,000 1,125,000

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    15/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    Global Payroll France 8.9 (2 Years History)

    Global Payroll France (50 versus 100 streams)

    0

    20,000

    40,000

    60,000

    80,000

    100,000120,000

    140,000

    160,000

    50 Job Streams

    18 CPUs

    100 Job Streams

    26 CPUs

    Employees/ho

    ur

    Calculate

    Calculate Retro

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    16/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    Global Payroll France 8.9 (1 Year History)

    Server Configuration

    Database(IBM p5 570)

    8 x 1.9 GHz Power 5 Processors / 64GB Memory

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    17/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM

    Global Payroll France 8.9 (1 Year History)

    Process Name

    (Batch)

    No Retro

    Throughput

    Payees/Hour

    Retro Throughput

    Payees/Hour

    Identify Parallel (32) 3,829,787 2,523,364

    Calculate Parallel (32) 130,751 75,356

    Finalize - Serial 11,739,130 3,529,412

    Payslip Parallel (32) 296,703 101,944

    Banking Preparation Serial 671,642 198,895

    Banking Preparation France

    Serial

    1,921,708 983,607

    Banking EFT Serial 7,200,000 2,950,820

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    18/32

    Agenda

    Enterprise Benchmarks HCM

    EPM

    Planning & Budgeting 8.9

    FMS

    SCM

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    19/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - EPM

    Planning & Budgeting 8.9

    Server Configuration

    Database

    (HP rx8620)

    8 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium2 Processors /

    16 GB Memory

    Application

    (HP rx4640)

    4 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium2 Processors /

    8 GB Memory

    Web

    (HP rx1620)

    2 x 1.3 GHz Intel Itanium2 Processors /

    64 GB Memory

    Load Driver

    HP ProLiant 6400R

    4 x 550 MHz Pentium Zeon Processors

    / 2 GB Memory

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    20/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - EPM

    Planning & Budgeting 8.9

    Batch Throughput

    Data Staging Serial 2,071,737 Rows/Hr

    Data Staging Parallel 3,258,240 Rows/Hr

    Full Model Recalculation - Serial 2,625,632 Rows/Hr

    Online Response Time

    Line Item Add 19.3 sec

    Position Add 3.46 sec

    View Variance Analysis 7.83 sec

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    21/32

    Agenda

    Enterprise Benchmarks HCM

    EPM

    FMS

    Financials Close the Books DIL 8.9

    Expenses 8.8 SCM

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    22/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS

    Financials Close the Books 8.9

    Server Configuration

    Database(Sun V440)

    8 x 900 MHz Ultra Sparc III+Processors / 16 GB Memory

    Application/Web

    (Sun V440)

    8 x 900 MHz Ultra Sparc III+

    Processors / 32 GB Memory

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    23/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS

    Financials Close the Books 8.9

    Throughput for Close Book Processes

    720K Journal Lines / Hr

    503K Ledger Lines/ Hr

    Batch Processes

    Journal Generator Summary Ledger

    Journal Edits & Post Consolidation

    Allocation SQRs

    Journal Edits & Post nVision Reports

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    24/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS

    Financials Close the Books 8.9

    Online Users (250) %Users Total Response Times (sec)

    Asset Management 5 6 14

    Accounts Payable 25 3 21

    Accounts Receivable 15 3 - 23

    Cash Management 5 2 18

    Expenses 30 4 - 23General Ledger 20 3 - 67

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    25/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS

    Expense 8.8/PT 8.5 Online Benchmark

    Benchmark 1700 Users 2000 Users

    DB2 for z/OS V7 Completed Completed

    DB2 for z/OS V8 incompatibility mode

    Completed Completed

    DB2 for z/OS V8 in new

    function mode

    Completed Completed

    DB2 for z/OS V8 in new

    function mode

    UNICODE

    database

    Completed Completed

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    26/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS

    Expense 8.8/PT 8.5

    CPU/MIPS usage increased by 20-28% from DB2

    V7 to DB2 V8 compatibility mode

    CPU/MIPS usage increased by 5-7% from DB2 V7

    to DB2 V8 new function mode

    Some Transaction response times are slightly

    higher

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    27/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS

    Unicode migration with Enterprise

    Methodology to migrate a PeopleSoft applicationdatabase from the EBCDIC to UNICODE encoding

    scheme Incorporates DataMover Tool, REXX Programs

    and IBM Cross Loader Utility

    White Paper is published on migration process.

    PeopleTools Development is currently working on

    tools to facilitate the migration process

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    28/32

    Agenda

    Enterprise Benchmarks HCM EPM

    FMS

    SCM

    Order Management (Counter Sale) 8.9

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    29/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - SCM

    Order Management (Counter Sales) 8.9

    Server Configuration

    Database

    (HP rx8620)

    16 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium 2

    Processors / 64 GB Memory

    3 Application

    (HP rx8620)

    16 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium 2

    Processors / 64 GB Memory

    2 Web

    (HP DL585 G1s)

    2 X 2.4 GHz AMD Opteron dual core

    Processors / 10 GB Memory

    1 Web

    (HP DL580 G2)

    4 x 4.0 GHz Intel Pentium IV Xeon

    Processors / 8 GB Memory

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    30/32

    Enterprise Benchmarks - SCM

    Order Management (Counter Sales) 8.9

    Transaction Name (Online) No of

    users

    Single

    user (sec)

    Multi user

    (sec)

    Lines /

    hour

    Create 5 line counter sale order 5000 9.35 10.07 100,000

    5 line order & payment 5000 4.52 5.04 100,000

    5 line order & margin adjustment on

    1 line

    4000 3.19 3.52 80,000

    25 line order & margin adjustment 1000 6.76 7.51 75,000

    Create MSR 1 line of 5 line order 4000 6.42 7.22 80,000

    Alternate source lookup 1 line of

    10 line order

    2500 1.33 1.42 100,000

  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    31/32

    References

    Benchmark Reports can be found at CustomerConnection

    Navigate to Implement, Optimize + Upgrade -> Implementation

    Guide -> Performance Tools -> Benchmark PerformanceReports

    http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&

    Expand=1

    http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1
  • 7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3

    32/32