Upload
nasir-ahmed
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
1/32
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
2/32
Agenda
Enterprise Benchmarks HCM
North American Payroll 8.9
Campus Solutions DIL 8.9
Campus Solutions 8.9
HR Self Service 8.9 GP France 8.9 with 2 year history
GP France 8.9 with 1 year history
EPM
FMS SCM
References
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
3/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
North American Payroll 8.9
Component Configuration
Hardware(IBM z990)
6 x IBM z990 Gen 1 Processors32 Gigabytes of Memory
Storage IBM Total Storage DS8300 Enterprise
Storage Server 2107-922
O/S IBM z/OS version 1.4
Database IBM DB2 for z/OS 8.1 (New Function Mode)
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
4/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
North American Payroll 8.9
Employee Demographics
120,000 paid employees
132,000 paychecks calculated and produced
4 Pay groups based on pay-cycles of weekly, bi-weekly, semi-monthly and monthly intervals
Weekly, bi-weekly and semi-monthly pay groups include bothhourly and salaried employees
Employees with multiple jobs within the same pay group are paidon a single check.
Batch Processes
Paysheet Creation 8 Concurrent Job Streams
Payroll Calculation 8 Sequential Job Streams
Payroll Confirmation 8 Concurrent Job Streams
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
5/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
North American Payroll 8.9
Employees Paid Concurrent Total Process Run Time
(120,000) Processes
Paysheet Creation 8 x 1 1.7 min
Payroll Calculation 1 x 8 116.8 min
Payroll Confirmation 8 x 1 11.6 min
Total Runtime - 130.1 min
Checks Per Hour - 60,876
Employees Per Hour - 55,342
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
6/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
Campus Solutions DIL 8.9 (4000 users)
Server Configuration
Database
(HP rx8620)
8 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium2 Processors /
16 GB Memory
Application
(5 HP Proliant
BL20p G2 Blade)
2 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 3
GB Memory
Web(HP Proliant BL20p
G2 Blade)
2 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 3GB Memory
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
7/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM Campus Solutions DIL 8.9 (4000 users)
Average Response times Logon Around 0.69 sec
Page Load Around 1 sec
Save Around 1.6 sec
Batch Throughput
Process Refund 3158 Students/Hr
Process Test Scores 5806 Students/Hr
Online Transactions
Add Class Load Student Center
Calculate Tuition Make Payment
Drop Class Schedule Plan
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
8/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
Campus Solutions 8.9 (4000 users)
OAS versus Web Logic versus Web Sphere
Server Configuration
Database
(HP rx8620)
8 x 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 16
GB Memory
Application
(5 HP Proliant
BL20p G2 Blade)
2 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 3
GB Memory
Web(HP Proliant BL20p
G2 Blade)
1 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon Processors / 3GB Memory
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
9/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
Campus Solutions 8.9 (4000 users)
OAS versus Web Logic versus Web Sphere
Transaction Name
(Online)
OAS
(sec)
Web Logic
(sec)
Web Sphere
(sec)Average Logon 0.96 1.11 1.00
Average Load Student
Center
1.29 1.34 1.57
Average Page Load 1.07 1.05 1.15
Average Page Save 1.83 1.83 1.97
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
10/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
Campus Solutions 8.9 (4000 users)
OAS versus Web Logic versus Web Sphere
Web CPU
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
OAS WebLogic WebSphere
CPUUtilization
Web CPU
Web Memory
2900.00
3000.00
3100.00
3200.00
3300.003400.00
3500.00
3600.00
3700.00
3800.00
OAS WebLogic WebSphere
Memory
(MB)
Web Memory
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
11/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
HR Self Service 8.9 (4000 Users)
Server Configuration
Database
(IBM P570)
4 x 1.9 GHz Power 5 Processors / 60
GB Memory
Application/Web(IBM P570)
12 x 1.9 GHz Power 5 Processors / 40GB Memory
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
12/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM HR Self Service 8.9 (4000 users)
Transaction Name (Online) Avg. Save/Search (sec)
A1 - Add a Person 0.369
A2 - Hire a Person 1.046
A3 - Add Job 1.959
E1 Update Home Address 0.65
E2
Update Phone Number 0.65E3 View Benefits Summary 0.816
E4 Update Beneficiary 0.887
E5 View Paycheck 1.266
E6 Update Direct Deposit 0.16
M1
View Employees 0.233
M2 Initiate Termination 0.221
M3 Initiate Promotion 0.371
M4 Initiate Employee Salary Chg 1.979
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
13/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
Global Payroll France 8.9 (2 Years History)
Server Configuration
Database(Sun Fire E25k)
18 x 1.5 GHz Ultra Sparc IV+ Dual coreProcessors / 160 GB Memory
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
14/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
Global Payroll France 8.9 (2 Years History)
Process Name
(Batch)
No Retro
Payees/Hour
Retro
Payees/Hour
Identify Parallel (54) 3,000,000 1,125,000
Calculate
Parallel (54) 112,500 75,630Finalize - Serial 9,000,000 4,500,000
Payslip Parallel (54) 500,000 115,385
Banking Preparation
Parallel (54)
1,800,000 1,000,000
Banking Preparation France
Serial
1,125,000 818,182
Banking EFT Serial 2,250,000 1,125,000
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
15/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
Global Payroll France 8.9 (2 Years History)
Global Payroll France (50 versus 100 streams)
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000120,000
140,000
160,000
50 Job Streams
18 CPUs
100 Job Streams
26 CPUs
Employees/ho
ur
Calculate
Calculate Retro
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
16/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
Global Payroll France 8.9 (1 Year History)
Server Configuration
Database(IBM p5 570)
8 x 1.9 GHz Power 5 Processors / 64GB Memory
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
17/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - HCM
Global Payroll France 8.9 (1 Year History)
Process Name
(Batch)
No Retro
Throughput
Payees/Hour
Retro Throughput
Payees/Hour
Identify Parallel (32) 3,829,787 2,523,364
Calculate Parallel (32) 130,751 75,356
Finalize - Serial 11,739,130 3,529,412
Payslip Parallel (32) 296,703 101,944
Banking Preparation Serial 671,642 198,895
Banking Preparation France
Serial
1,921,708 983,607
Banking EFT Serial 7,200,000 2,950,820
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
18/32
Agenda
Enterprise Benchmarks HCM
EPM
Planning & Budgeting 8.9
FMS
SCM
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
19/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - EPM
Planning & Budgeting 8.9
Server Configuration
Database
(HP rx8620)
8 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium2 Processors /
16 GB Memory
Application
(HP rx4640)
4 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium2 Processors /
8 GB Memory
Web
(HP rx1620)
2 x 1.3 GHz Intel Itanium2 Processors /
64 GB Memory
Load Driver
HP ProLiant 6400R
4 x 550 MHz Pentium Zeon Processors
/ 2 GB Memory
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
20/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - EPM
Planning & Budgeting 8.9
Batch Throughput
Data Staging Serial 2,071,737 Rows/Hr
Data Staging Parallel 3,258,240 Rows/Hr
Full Model Recalculation - Serial 2,625,632 Rows/Hr
Online Response Time
Line Item Add 19.3 sec
Position Add 3.46 sec
View Variance Analysis 7.83 sec
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
21/32
Agenda
Enterprise Benchmarks HCM
EPM
FMS
Financials Close the Books DIL 8.9
Expenses 8.8 SCM
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
22/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS
Financials Close the Books 8.9
Server Configuration
Database(Sun V440)
8 x 900 MHz Ultra Sparc III+Processors / 16 GB Memory
Application/Web
(Sun V440)
8 x 900 MHz Ultra Sparc III+
Processors / 32 GB Memory
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
23/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS
Financials Close the Books 8.9
Throughput for Close Book Processes
720K Journal Lines / Hr
503K Ledger Lines/ Hr
Batch Processes
Journal Generator Summary Ledger
Journal Edits & Post Consolidation
Allocation SQRs
Journal Edits & Post nVision Reports
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
24/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS
Financials Close the Books 8.9
Online Users (250) %Users Total Response Times (sec)
Asset Management 5 6 14
Accounts Payable 25 3 21
Accounts Receivable 15 3 - 23
Cash Management 5 2 18
Expenses 30 4 - 23General Ledger 20 3 - 67
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
25/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS
Expense 8.8/PT 8.5 Online Benchmark
Benchmark 1700 Users 2000 Users
DB2 for z/OS V7 Completed Completed
DB2 for z/OS V8 incompatibility mode
Completed Completed
DB2 for z/OS V8 in new
function mode
Completed Completed
DB2 for z/OS V8 in new
function mode
UNICODE
database
Completed Completed
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
26/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS
Expense 8.8/PT 8.5
CPU/MIPS usage increased by 20-28% from DB2
V7 to DB2 V8 compatibility mode
CPU/MIPS usage increased by 5-7% from DB2 V7
to DB2 V8 new function mode
Some Transaction response times are slightly
higher
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
27/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - FMS
Unicode migration with Enterprise
Methodology to migrate a PeopleSoft applicationdatabase from the EBCDIC to UNICODE encoding
scheme Incorporates DataMover Tool, REXX Programs
and IBM Cross Loader Utility
White Paper is published on migration process.
PeopleTools Development is currently working on
tools to facilitate the migration process
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
28/32
Agenda
Enterprise Benchmarks HCM EPM
FMS
SCM
Order Management (Counter Sale) 8.9
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
29/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - SCM
Order Management (Counter Sales) 8.9
Server Configuration
Database
(HP rx8620)
16 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium 2
Processors / 64 GB Memory
3 Application
(HP rx8620)
16 x 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium 2
Processors / 64 GB Memory
2 Web
(HP DL585 G1s)
2 X 2.4 GHz AMD Opteron dual core
Processors / 10 GB Memory
1 Web
(HP DL580 G2)
4 x 4.0 GHz Intel Pentium IV Xeon
Processors / 8 GB Memory
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
30/32
Enterprise Benchmarks - SCM
Order Management (Counter Sales) 8.9
Transaction Name (Online) No of
users
Single
user (sec)
Multi user
(sec)
Lines /
hour
Create 5 line counter sale order 5000 9.35 10.07 100,000
5 line order & payment 5000 4.52 5.04 100,000
5 line order & margin adjustment on
1 line
4000 3.19 3.52 80,000
25 line order & margin adjustment 1000 6.76 7.51 75,000
Create MSR 1 line of 5 line order 4000 6.42 7.22 80,000
Alternate source lookup 1 line of
10 line order
2500 1.33 1.42 100,000
7/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
31/32
References
Benchmark Reports can be found at CustomerConnection
Navigate to Implement, Optimize + Upgrade -> Implementation
Guide -> Performance Tools -> Benchmark PerformanceReports
http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&
Expand=1
http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1http://www4.peoplesoft.com/AllConn/stsbenchm.nsf/CCPerfReportsByApp?ReadForm&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=17/30/2019 CAB E Benchmarking 06 3
32/32