Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
The effectiveness of pictorial presentation of risks of breastcancer and screening for improving health literacy among
minority ethnic women in the UK
Dr. Lai Fong ChiuSenior Research Fellow
Institute of Heath SciencesUniversity of Leeds
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Health LiteracyHealth Literacy is the ability to make sound health decision in the context of every day life – at home, in the community, at the workplace, the health care system, the market place and the political arena. It is a critical empowerment strategy to increase people’s control over their health, their ability to seek out information and their ability to take responsibility.
Kickbusch, Maag, Health Literacy: towards active health citizenship 2005
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Informed decision and choice
• The significance of health literacy-personal, social, economic and inequalities
• The choice agenda in health– In danger of disenfranchising vulnerable
groups i.e. less educated, disabled, elderly and socially excluded (migrants and minority ethnic communities)
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Informed decision and choice
• Successful access to increasingly complex health systems requires people to have high level of health literacy – How do migrant and minority ethnic communities fare
?• More likely to use accident and emergency services• Less likely to use preventive services (breast and cervical
screening)• Providing (translated) information is not enough
– Other strategies i.e. Community Health Educator model are needed
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Communication For Health (C4H) Project
• Participatory Action Research approach to improve health literacy through the production of health videos ‘Your Health, Your Choice’– Involving 4 language communities:
• Mirpuri/Pakistani, Syhleti/Bengali, Cantonese and Mandarin/Chinese The Process – documented in an audio/visual report: ‘Reflection’ can be view on http://healthcommunication.leeds.ac.uk/C4h
• Audience evaluation to assess outcomes
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Informed Choice and the understanding of risks
• Rationalists’ estimations of risks– Probabilities of good and adverse outcomes as
decision making tools• Probabilities are used in health resources to aid informed
choice• Lay people appreciate the need to take risks in order to
come to a diagnosis• Understanding of risks expressed in basic numerical
forms is not well understood• Embedded messages in video provided a good
opportunity for an exploration of this link
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Presentation of risks
• Context – Consultation, teaching, conversation, media
• What is being presented?– Probabilities in numerical terms as constructed by
epidemiologists• How are these messages being presented in the video?
– Biographically through narration of individual life stories
– Verbal didactic materials – Visual representations
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Key risk message 1
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Key risk message 2
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Key risk message 3
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Key risk message 4
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Aims of the evaluation
• To observe women’s responses to the video
• To investigate the effectiveness of the video in facilitating informed choice of breast screening
• The effectiveness of the novel presentation of four key risk messages in improving informed choice
Hypothesis: Risk messages would more likely to be understood and retained using a combination of visual and aural representations
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
• Cantonese• Mandarin• Bengali• Pakistani
-women aged between 40 – 85 -the role of younger women in thesegroups as “significant others”
Target audience
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Audience
• A total of 115 women from four ethnic groups took part in previewing the video
• Experimental (58) and control (57) groups
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Training of Community Health Educators
• Familiarising CHEs with the content of the video• Understanding conventional research ethics and
procedures• Micro-teaching and audience research
– Facilitating discussion – Individual interviewing – Non-literate environment – Adaptation of research material e.g. questionnaire
with visual material for memory retention test
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Field trial design
Shown slides then watch film
Watch film only
Discussion Discussion
Individual Interviews Individual Interviews
Experimental Control
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Slides shown to experimental group
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Results
2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00
R a tin g o f film
0
10
20
30
40
Freq
uenc
y M ean = 8.2212Std. Dev. = 2.00464N = 104
H o w did yo u fin d th e film ?
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Results (cont.)After watching the film, do you think you have enough
information to make a choice?
y e s n o n o t s u r eE n o u g h i n f o r m a t i o n to m a k e a c h o i c e ?
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
Freq
uenc
y
8 4 .2 1 %
3 .5 1 %
1 2 .2 8 %
N = 1 1 4
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Risk message 1:How many women develop breast cancer in the UK?
correct incorrect
one in nine
0
10
20
30
40
50
Cou
nt
GroupExperimentalControl
one in nine * Group Crosstabulation
Count
50 47 978 9 17
58 56 114
correctincorrect
one innine
Total
Experimental ControlGroup
Total
Z= -0.340 p=0.734
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Risk message 2:For 100 women screened how many will be called back?
correct incorrect
Call back
0
10
20
30
40
50
Cou
nt
GroupExperimentalControl
Call back * Group Crosstabulation
Count
46 32 7812 25 3758 57 115
correctincorrect
Call back
Total
Experimental ControlGroup
Total
Z=2.6 p=0.008
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Risk message 3:For eight of the women who are called back,
how many will likely be diagnosed with cancer?
correct incorrect
Risk of diagnosed of cancer
0
10
20
30
40
50
Cou
nt
GroupExperimentalControl
Risk of diagnosed of cancer * Group Crosstabulation
Count
48 35 8310 22 3258 57 115
correctincorrect
Risk of diagnosedof cancer
Total
Experimental ControlGroup
Total
Z=-2.5 p=0.01
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Risk message 4:The incidence of breast cancer increases with age
40-50 60-70 80-85over "unsure"
Estimated age risk
0
10
20
30
40
50
Cou
nt
Estimated age risk * Group Crosstabulation
Count
3 14 177 8 15
45 31 763 4 7
58 57 115
40-5060-7080-85over"unsure"
Estimatedage risk
Total
Experimental ControlGroup
Total
Z=-2.31 p=0.02
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Some comments from groups
• Very clear and easy to understand what breast screening is about
• Good to see women from our own communities talking about this issue
• It [the film] is new in style and not boring• “It seems fun”- some women would like to be involved in
making films like this• “What about me?” – one woman (53yrs of age) asked
about screening after watching the film.
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Other comments...
• Too noisy in community centres• The volume of the film was too low, can’t hear
well• Need more information
• Lessons learnt:– Select good venue– Ensure good equipment available– Give time for discussion
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Conclusion (1)
• The film was well received by target audience• Most women felt that the film provided adequate
information to make a choice• The majority of women were able to understand the key
risk information contained in the film• Those women who were shown the slides about
numerical risks appeared to have retained those messages better than those who were not
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Conclusion (2)• Participatory approach is an important strategy to
develop health literacy among migrants and minority ethnic communities
• This trial demonstrates a possibility of helping minority ethnic women with low health literacy to understand risks in numerical terms
• Health literacy is a complex concept, the link between ‘information’ and ‘choice’ is tenuous– Other barriers stopping women to access services e.g. fear, lack
of language support or lack of transport.• Further exploration of the different dimensions (i.e.
mental and social) of health literacy is necessary
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Key points
• Videos are only tools for developing health literacy• Improving the understanding of risk and probability is
important but it is not the only way to facilitate informed choice
• Presentation of risk and probability information in a novel way can stimulate interests for the topic among vulnerable groups
• Specifically, presenting both aural and visual information increase the chance of helping people to understand and retain abstract information such as cancer and cancer screening risks
11-13/4/2007 HPH Conference
Thank You for listening!grazie per ascoltare!
Gracias por escuchar!