19
COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES Flawed Arguments

C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIESFlawed Arguments

Page 2: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

LOGICAL FALLACIES…

Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will:

Strengthen your own arguments Help you critique other’s arguments

Page 3: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

HASTY GENERALIZATION

A generalization based on insufficient or unrepresented evidence

Deaths from drug overdoses in Metropolis have doubled over the last three years. Therefore, more Americans than ever are dying from drug abuse.

One student is arrested for drugs and suddenly all students in that school are called druggies.

Page 4: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

NON SEQUITUR (DOES NOT FOLLOW)

A conclusion that does not follow logically from preceding statements. Or the train of thought jumps the tracks at some point. Mary loves children, so she will make an excellent

school teacher. (This support alone does not follow or is Non-Sequitor—If Mary is a murderer, or has a 50 IQ, she will not make a good teacher no matter how much she loves kids.)

No one should grill their steaks. Cows don’t like smoke. (This does not follow because it does not make sense. The cows are dead. They are steaks.)

Page 5: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

FALSE ANALOGY

The assumption that because two things are alike in some respects, they are alike in others. If we put humans on the moon, we should be

able to find a cure for the common cold! IF teachers can use the phones and drink coffee

in school, students should be able to also! If adults can legally drink alcohol, teenagers

should be able to also!

Page 6: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

“EITHER… OR” FALLACY

The suggestion that only two alternatives exist when in fact there are more.

Either learn how to program a computer, or you won’t be able to get a decent job after college.

Page 7: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

FALSE CAUSE (POST HOC, COINCIDENCE VS. CAUSALITY) The assumption that because one event

follows another, the first is the cause of the second.

Every time I wear my blue sweater, it snows. OMG, MY BLUE SWEATER CAUSES SNOW!!!

Page 8: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

TU QUO QUE

YOU DO IT TOO Saying they do it too does not negate their

argument it is valid. Claiming a person’s argument is wrong or

weak because they do the behavior they are arguing against.

Ex: Dr. says “Stop smoking or you will die. You have bronchitis.

Patient says “I don’t have to listen to you, you smoke too!”

Page 9: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

CIRCULAR REASONING/ BEGGING THE QUESTION

An argument in which the writer, instead of applying evidence simply restates the point in other language. God exists. How do you know? The Bible says

so. Who wrote the Bible? God. Chicken nuggets are good. Why are they good?

Because they are tasty. Why are they tasty? Because they are good!

Page 10: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

FALSE AUTHORITYThe person presenting the argument is an

authority, but not on the subject at hand.

Three types:Self Proof—”Because I said so”Spokes Person—”Because famous person says so”Too much Credit—”Because they are good at one

thing, they know all things”I have a degree in Medicine and I am here to tell you the economy is about to FAIL!

Page 11: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

AD BACULUMAPPEAL TO FEAR

Proving your argument through fear or the threat of consequences instead of using logical reasoning.

Scare people in order to prove your point.

“If you do not believe in God, you will go to Hell.”

“Global warming will kill us all so stop using hairspray.”

“If you do not sit down, I will fail you.”

Page 12: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

ARGUMENT TO THE PERSON (AD HOMINEM) An attack on the person proposing an

argument rather than on the argument itself.

Senator Jones was a conscientious objector during the Vietnam War, so his proposal to limit military spending has no merit.

Why are you talking about an open campus? You cannot even drive, silly sophomore!

Page 13: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

RED HERRING

An argument that focuses on an irrelevant issue to detract attention from the real issue.

A Red Herring is literally a SMELLY FISH. You basically say, “My back is against the wall. I cannot win this argument. HERE IS AN AWFUL SMELLY FISH TO DISTRACT YOU!

Mom, I know I have ISS for tardies but at least I am not doing drugs like all those other kids up there!

Page 14: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

PITY (AD MISERICORDIAM) Ad Misericordiam is an appeal to accept the

truth of a conclusion out of pity for the arguer or some third party. Either the arguer (or someone else) is already an object of pity, or they will become one if the conclusion is not accepted. If I don’t get at least a B in this course my GPA

will drop below 2.0. If that happens I’ll lose my scholarship and have to quit school, so I ought to get a B in this course.

Page 15: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

NON-DISPROOF

One sometimes encounters arguments that some claim should be accepted because they have never been disproved. The move from ‘not disproved’ to ‘proved’ is invalid. No one has ever proven that I can’t flap my arms

and fly, so maybe I can. No one has ever shown that it is impossible that

the stars rule our lives; therefore, astrology is true.

No one has ever proved that Big Foot doesn’t exist, so thus he does!

Page 16: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

SLIPPERY SLOPE Like a muddy hill, if we go down this slope we will

fall If we allow one thing a whole slew of other,

negative events will occur as a result If we allow students to have ipods, pretty soon

they will have entire systems out in class bumping bass all over the school.

If we pass this health care bill eventually the government will take over the decision-making from patients and doctors

Page 17: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

STRAW MAN

The person attacks an argument which is different from, and usually weaker than, the opposition's best argument. Setting up a fake version of something or

someone that is easy for others to not like.

Ex. Katie, my shih-tzu, isn’t really hungry; she just wants us to get up all the time and cater to her every whim!

People who think abortion should be banned have no respect for the rights of women. They treat them as nothing but baby-making machines. That's wrong. Women must have the right to choose.

Page 18: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

Circular reasoning

http://www.cafepress.com

Page 19: C OMMON L OGICAL F ALLACIES Flawed Arguments. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: Strengthen your own

http://www.cafepress.com

Either/Or