Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research22nd Annual ConferenceMarch 30 – 31, 2010
C iti l HHRC iti l HHR R l t dR l t dCritical HHRCritical HHR--Related Related
Success Factors Underlying Success Factors Underlying
Effective System Change I Effective System Change I ––y gy g
SystemSystem--level (macro) Success Storeslevel (macro) Success Stores
Dr. Brian Postl
1
Joint Operating DivisionJoint Operating Division
Supporting Development ofSupporting Development of Manitoba’s Academic Health Sciences NetworkSciences Network
2
Joint Operating Divisionp g
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority and University of Manitoba
• approximately 1500 medical staff
• independent contractor relationship with the WRHA• independent contractor relationship with the WRHA
• separate employment relationship (or volunteer) with the University
3
Joint Operating DivisionJoint Operating Division
Shared vision of an Academic Health Sciences Network within a regional context:
• Functional integration of patient‐centred clinical service, health sciences education research and administrationsciences education, research and administration
• Pooling of Resources between Region and faculty
• Single job description and accountabilities for all of clinical, education, and research responsibilities
4
Joint Operating DivisionJoint Operating Division
Joint administrative structure:
– Recruitment and retention of medical staff and facultyy
– Coordination of educational programs and projects
– Coordination of research programs and projects
5
Joint Operating DivisionJoint Operating Division
• JOD created in fall of 2008
• Executive Director and WRHA Chief Medical Office/Associate D Cli i l Aff i i l J 2009Dean Clinical Affairs in place – January 2009
6
Joint Operating DivisionJoint Operating Division
JOD AFP AHS Network
7
Joint Operating DivisionJoint Operating Division
Coordination of Education Programs and Projectsg j
• Terms of Reference for an Education Advisory Council established
• Clinical Learning Simulation Facility operational
8
Joint Operating DivisionJoint Operating Division
Coordination of Research Programs and Projects
• Terms of Reference for Research Advisory Council established• Terms of Reference for Research Advisory Council established
• Centre for Healthcare Innovation established
• Neurobiology Program under development
9
Nurse Practitioner in Long Term Careu se act t o e o g e Ca e
Outcome of NP as Primary Care Provider:
• Decreased drug cost/bed/day from $3.50 to $2.51
• Polypharmacy rate reduced by 55%
• Antipsychotic medication use decreased by 63%
• Transfers to emergency reduced by 20%
• Family satisfaction with the quality of health care provided increased 24%
10
Nurse Practitioner in Emergency D Mi TDepartments – Minor Treatment
Outcomes:
• Left Not Seen reduced by approximately 11% 7 9% in first 6 months• Left Not Seen reduced by approximately 11% ‐ 7.9% in first 6 months
• Reduced Length of Stay for ALL patients by 30 – 40 minutes
• Reduced Length of Stay for CTAs 4 & 5
11
Addressing an anesthesiology shortage in /WRHA/UM system
• 1990s/early 2000s: Anesthesia shortage
• Multiple solutions– New leadership
– Enhanced recruitment of faculty–– Fellowship trainingFellowship training
– Improved OR efficiencies
12
Alternate Provider ModelsOpthalmic Sedation Practioners (OSP)
Impetus: • Shortage of anesthesiologists, OR cancellations
Opthalmic Sedation Practioners (OSP)
g g ,
Solution:l h l i f i h i l i f h ll i• Less‐complex opthalmic cases, freeing up anesthesiologists for challenging
slates
– RTs/RNs/IMGs (1‐month course, OR‐based, tailored content)
Success Factors:• Strong LeadershipStrong Leadership
• Similar models had demonstrated success elsewhere
• Convincing anesthesiologists/surgeons/hospital
13
Ophthalmic Sedation Providers (OSPs)
Outcomes: Rare situation where all are winners
• Improved use of anesthesiologists
– Anesthesiologist:OR ratio (1:1 1:3, soon to be 1:4) – Central monitoring allows MD to troubleshoot/oversee while OSP i t i kflOSPs maintain workflow
• Redeploy anesthesiologists to other sites• Redeploy anesthesiologists to other sites
– ↓ cancellations
14
Ophthalmic Sedation Providers (OSPs)
• FFS redirected to stipend anesthesiologist, OSP salaries
• Significant FFS excess redirected to
• Hire academic anesthesiologists with changing allegiances
D l• Departmental capital/research/educational/administration
• Created new practice opportunities for RTs/RNs/IMGs
15
Ophthalmic Sedation Providers (OSPs)
• Surgeon/hospital satisfaction high
– 100% slate delivery maintained volumes no safety– 100% slate delivery, maintained volumes, no safety issues in > 5000 cases
• Patient satisfaction high, unchanged
16
Anesthesia Clinical Assistants (ACA)Anesthesia Clinical Assistants (ACA)
• Advanced 1‐year course for RTs, nurse, IMG, others
• Deliver anesthesia care under direct supervision of Anesthesiologist, governed by CPSMAnesthesiologist, governed by CPSM
17
Anesthesia Clinical Assistants (ACA)Anesthesia Clinical Assistants (ACA)
Success FactorsSuccess Factors
• LeadershipLeadership
• “Slippery slope to nurse anesthesia”
• Anesthesia shortage/over‐work
• Would improve quality of work‐life, enhance safety/efficiency
18
Patient Transport ProgramPatient Transport Program
• Since 2000, Inter‐facility Patient Transport Team staffed with Advanced Practice Respiratory Therapists (RTs)
• Collaboration with Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Servicep g– Single communication centre staff – Primary Care Paramedic crews staff ambulances– Transfer ambulances or roaming supervisory units rapidly transport RTs to any WRHA site for unstable/critical patients
19
unstable/critical patients
Patient Transport Programat e t a spo t og a
• Delegation of function from physician
20
Patient Transport Programat e t a spo t og a
• Full scope of RT clinical practice
– Advanced life support, including intubation, d fib ill i di i idefibrillation, medications, pacing, etc.
– Administer medications as required, including vasopressors, inotropes, antiarrhythmics, sedatives narcotics etcsedatives, narcotics, etc
21
Patient Transport Programat e t a spo t og a
• Scheduled time for ongoing competency maintenancemaintenance
Simulation lab and clinical time for low– Simulation lab and clinical time for low volume/high risk skills built into rotation
22
Patient Transport Program
Benefits of Model:
• Staffing efficiencies– NursingAdvanced Care Paramedics on emergency ambulances– Advanced Care Paramedics on emergency ambulances remain available to respond to 911 calls
• Enhanced safety and consistency for patients movingEnhanced safety and consistency for patients moving between WRHA sites
• RTs also accept patients from paramedic crews duringRTs also accept patients from paramedic crews during offloading delays in Emergency Departments
23
Patient Transport Program
Benefits of Model:
• High job satisfaction for RTs who are empowered to work to f ll scope of practiceto full scope of practice
24