C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    1/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Basics of Reservoir Engineering Module I

    I.1.B Reservoir Fundamentals of Fluid Flow

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    2/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Porosity

    Porosity of a measure of the

    void space within a rock

    Range or Typical Values:

    30%, unconsolidated well-sorted

    sandstone

    20%, clean, well-sorted consolidated

    sandstone8%, low permeability reservoir rock

    0.5%, natural fracture porosity

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    3/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Reservoir Make-up

    Rock matrix

    Pore space Fluids: Water,

    Oil and gas

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    4/97Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Rock Matrix and Pore Space

    Rock matrix Pore space

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    5/97Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Rock Matrix and Pore Space

    Rock matrix Water Oil and/or gas

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    6/97Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Porosity Definition

    Porosity: The fractional void space within a rock that isavailable for the storage of fluids

    b

    mab

    b

    p

    V

    VV

    V

    VPorosity

    ===

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    7/97Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Effect Grain Size and Packing

    Cubic Packing of SpheresPorosity = 48%

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    8/97Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Porosity Calculations Cubic/Uniform Spheres

    Bulk volume = (2r)3 = 8r3

    Matrix volume =

    Pore volume = bulk volume - matrix volume

    34

    3

    r

    Calculations for Cubic Packing

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    9/97Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Porosity Calculations Cubic/Uniform Spheres

    ( ) %6.47

    321

    8

    3/48

    3

    33

    ==

    =

    =

    =

    r

    rr

    VolumeBulk

    VolumeMatrixVolumeBulk

    VolumeBulk

    VolumePorePorosity

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    10/97Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Effect Grain Size and Packing

    Rhombic Packing of SpheresPorosity = 27 %

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    11/97Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Effect Grain Size and Packing

    Packing of Two Sizes of Spheres

    Porosity = 14%

    P S Cl ifi ti

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    12/97Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Pore-Space Classification

    Total porosity, t =

    Effective porosity, e =

    VolumeBulk

    SpacePoreTotal

    VolumeBulk

    SpacePorectedInterconne

    C i f T t l d Eff ti P iti

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    13/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Comparison of Total and Effective Porosities

    Very clean sandstones : t = e

    Poorly to moderately well -cemented intergranular

    materials: t e

    Highly cemented materials and most carbonates: e

    < t

    F t Th t Aff t P it

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    14/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Factors That Affect Porosity

    Particle shape

    Packing

    Particle sizes Cementing materials

    Overburden stress

    Vugs and fractures

    Example Porosity/Overburden Pressure Relationship

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    15/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Example Porosity/Overburden Pressure Relationship

    50

    Overburden pressure, psi

    Po r o

    s ity ,

    %30

    40

    20

    10

    00 1,000 3,0002,000 4,000 5,000 6,000

    Sandstones

    Shales

    Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    16/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Permeability

    Permeability is a measure of the rocks ability to transmit fluids

    pA

    Lqk

    = Aq q

    p1p

    2

    L

    Permeability Values

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    17/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Permeability Values

    The quality of the reservoir, as it relates to permeability, can be

    classified as follows:

    k < 1 md poor

    1 < k < 10 md fair

    10 < k < 50 md moderate

    50 < k < 250 md good

    250 md < k very good

    Example

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    18/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Example

    Permeability-Porosity Relationship

    From Tiab and Donaldson

    Factors affecting permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    19/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Factors affecting permeability

    1.0

    .8

    .6

    .4

    .2

    .0

    0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

    Permeability:fractionofo

    riginal

    Net overburden pressure: psi

    A

    B

    C

    A

    Well cemented

    Friable

    Unconsolidated

    Scales of Geological Reservoir Heterogeneity

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    20/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Scales of Geological Reservoir Heterogeneity

    FieldWide

    Interw

    ell

    Well-Bore

    (modified from Weber, 1986)

    Hand Lens or

    Binocular Microscope

    Unaided Eye

    Petrographic orScanning Electron

    Microscope

    DeterminedFrom Well Logs,Seismic Lines,

    StatisticalModeling,etc.

    10-100'sm

    10-100'smm

    1-10'sm

    100's

    m

    10'sm

    1-10 km

    100's m

    Well WellInterwellArea

    ReservoirSandstone

    Scales of Investigation Used in Reservoir

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    21/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Scales of Investigation Used in Reservoir

    Characterization

    Gigascopic

    Megascopic

    Macroscopic

    Microscopic

    Well Test

    Reservoir ModelGrid Cell

    Wireline LogInterval

    Core Plug

    GeologicalThin Section

    Relative Volume

    1

    1014

    2 x 1012

    3 x 107

    5 x 102

    300 m

    50 m

    300 m

    5 m 150 m

    2 m

    1 m

    cm

    mm -m

    (modified from Hurst, 1993)

    Permeability Exercise 1

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    22/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Permeability Exercise 1

    What are the units of permeability?

    Use Dimensional Analysis:pALqk

    =

    Permeability Exercise 2

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    23/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Permeability Exercise 2

    Relate the permeability concept to other common fluid flow

    situations: laminar fluid flow through a pipe and through parallelplates (fractures).

    What is the permeability of a circular opening (vug) of 0.005

    inches?

    What is the permeability of a fracture of 0.01 in thickness?

    Saturations

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    24/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Saturations

    H2O

    Fluid Saturations

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    25/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Fluid Saturations

    Grain Water Gas Oil

    Definition of Fluid Saturation

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    26/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Definition of Fluid Saturation

    p

    w

    w V

    VS =

    Water saturation:

    Oil saturation:

    Gas saturation:

    p

    ooV

    VS =

    wog SSS = 0.1

    Net Pay Thickness

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    27/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Net Pay Thickness

    Shale

    Sand

    h3

    h2

    h1

    h = h1 + h2 + h3

    Rock Wettability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    28/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Rock Wettability

    Wettability: Tendency of one fluid to spread on or adhere

    to a solid surface in the presence of other immiscible fluidsWettability refers to interaction between fluid and solidphases

    Solid

    WaterOil

    os

    ws

    ow

    Solid

    WaterOil

    os ws

    ow

    Solid surface is reservoir rock (i.e., sandstone, limestone,

    dolomite or mixtures of each) -- Fluids are oil, water, and/or gas

    Interfacial Tension and Adhesion Tension

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    29/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Interfacial Tension and Adhesion Tension

    Interfacial tension is the force per unit length required to create a new

    surface

    Interfacial tension is commonly expressed in Newtons/meter or

    dynes/cm

    Adhesion tension can be expressed as the difference between two

    solid-fluid interfacial tensions

    cosowwsosTA

    Contact Angle

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    30/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    g

    Solid

    Water

    Oil

    Oil Oil

    os ws

    ow

    Wetting Phase Fluid

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    31/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Wetting Phase Fluid

    A wetting phase preferentially wets the solid rock surface

    Because of attractive forces between rock and fluid, the wetting phase

    is drawn into smaller pore spaces of porous media

    Wetting phase fluid often is not very mobile

    Attractive forces prohibit reduction in wetting phase saturation belowsome irreducible value (called irreducible wetting phase saturation)

    Many hydrocarbon reservoirs tend to be either totally or partially

    water wet

    Nonwetting Phase Fluid

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    32/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Nonwetting Phase Fluid

    A nonwetting phase does not preferentially wet the solid rock

    surface

    Repulsive forces between rock and fluid cause nonwetting phase tooccupy largest pore spaces of porous media

    Nonwetting phase fluid is often the most mobile fluid, especially at

    large nonwetting phase saturationsNatural gas is never the wetting phase in hydrocarbon reservoirs

    Water-Wet Reservoir Rock

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    33/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Reservoir rock is considered to be water-wet if water

    preferentially wets the rock surfaces

    The rock is water-wet under the following conditions:

    ws >os

    AT < 0 (i.e., the adhesion tension is negative)0

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    34/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Solid

    Water

    Oil

    os ws

    ow

    Note: 0

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    35/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Reservoir rock is considered to be oil-wet if oil preferentially

    wets the rock surfaces

    The rock is oil-wet under the following conditions:

    os >ws

    AT > 0 (i.e., the adhesion tension is positive)

    90

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    36/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Solid

    Water

    Oil

    os ws

    ow

    Note: 90

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    37/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Wettability affects the shape of the relative permeability curves.

    Oil moves easier in water-wet rocks than oil-wet rocks.

    Primary oil recovery is affected by the wettability.

    A water-wet system will exhibit greater primary oil recovery.

    Oil recovery under waterflooding is affected by wettability

    A water-wet system will exhibit greater oil recovery under

    waterflooding.

    Implications of Wettability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    38/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    1

    2345

    Coreno

    Percentsilicone Wettability

    0.00

    0.02000.2002.001.00

    0.649

    0.176- 0.222- 0.250- 0.333

    Curves cut off at Fwd 100

    1 23

    4

    5

    Water injected, pore volumes

    Recoveryefficiency,percent,Soi

    Implications of Wettability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    39/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Squirrel oil - 0.10 N NaCl - Torpedo core ( 33 O W 663,K 0945, Swi 21.20%)

    Squirrel oil - 0.10 N NaCl Torpedo Sandstone core,after remaining in oil for 84 days ( 33.0 W 663, K

    0.925, Swi 23.28%)

    Recoveryefficiency,percentS

    pi

    Water injection, pore volumes

    Capillary Pressure Definition

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    40/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Capillary Pressure Definition

    Capillary Pressure is the pressure difference existing

    across the interface separating two immiscible fluids.It is usually calculated as:

    Pc=pnwt-pwt

    ow

    Pw, Water

    Po, Oil

    Pw, Water

    Po, Oil

    ow

    os

    wsos

    ws

    Capillary Example 1

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    41/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Define capillary pressure in the following systems: Water-gas system

    Water-wet water-oil system Oil-gas system

    Capillary Tube Model. Air-Water System

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    42/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Water

    Air

    h

    Capillary Tube Model. Air-Water System

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    43/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Capillary Tube Model. Air Water System

    The height of water is a function of

    The adhesion tension between the air and water

    The radius of the tube

    The density difference between fluids

    aw

    aw

    grh

    =

    cos2

    Capillary Tube Model. Air-Water System

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    44/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Capillary Tube Model. Air Water System

    Air

    Water

    pa2

    h

    pa1pw1

    pw2

    Capillary Pressure. Air-Water System

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    45/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    p y y

    Combining the two relations results in the following

    expression :

    r

    P awc cos2

    =

    Capillary Pressure. Oil-Water System

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    46/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    From a similar derivation, the equation for capillarypressure for an oil/water system is

    rP

    ow

    c

    cos2

    =

    Imbibition and Drainage & Capillary Pressure

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    47/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Imbibition: Fluid flow process in which the saturation of

    the wetting phase increases and the nonwetting phasesaturation decreases

    Mobility of wetting phase increases as wetting phasesaturation increases

    Drainage: Fluid flow process in which the saturation of the

    nonwetting phase increases

    Mobility of nonwetting fluid phase increases as nonwetting

    phase saturation increases

    Typical Drainage and Imbibition Capillary Pressure

    Curves

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    48/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Curves

    Drainage (1)

    Imbibition (2)

    Si Sm

    Sw

    Pd

    Pc

    0 0.5 1.0

    The pc-drainage curve is

    always higher than the pc-imbibition curve.

    Capillarity Exercise 2

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    49/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    50

    0

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    (1)

    (2)

    Sw

    Pc, psi

    0 0.5 1.00.25 0.75

    Converting Laboratory Capillary Pressure Data to

    Reservoir Conditions

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    50/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Reservoir Conditions

    Based on our previous derivation, we use the following basic

    equations:

    L

    LL

    cL rP

    cos2

    =

    R

    RRcR

    rP

    cos2=

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    51/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Setting rL = rR and combining equations yields

    Capillary pressure at reservoir conditions

    cR

    RR

    cL

    LLRL

    PPrr

    cos2cos2==

    cL

    LL

    RRcR PP

    cos

    cos=

    Capillarity Example 3

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    52/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Converting Laboratory Capillary Pressure Data to Reservoir Conditions

    0

    400

    800

    1200

    1600

    2000

    020406080

    Mercury Saturation, percent pore space

    InjectionPress

    ure,psia

    Example 3

    Solution

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    53/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Solution

    MercurySaturation

    (SHg)%

    PcLpsia

    PcRpsia

    70 1,320 80.560 820 50.0

    50 560 34.2

    40 410 25.030 310 18.920 240 14.610 200 12.2

    Effects of Reservoir Properties on Capillary Pressure

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    54/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Capillary pressure characteristics in reservoir are affected by

    Variations in permeability Grain size distribution

    Saturation history

    Contact angle

    Interfacial tension

    Density difference between fluids

    Effect of Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    55/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Decreasing

    Permeability

    A B

    C

    20

    16

    12

    8

    4

    00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    Water Saturation

    Capillary

    Pressure

    Effect of Grain Size Distribution

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    56/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Well-sorted Poorly sorted

    Cap

    illarypres

    sure,psia

    Water saturation, %

    Effect of Saturation History

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    57/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Water saturation, %

    Cap

    illarypres

    sure,psia

    Imbibition

    Drainage

    Effect of Contact Angle

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    58/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Decreasing R

    R = 30

    R = 60

    R = 0

    Capillary

    Pressure

    R = 80

    20

    16

    12

    8

    4

    00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    Water Saturation

    Effect of Interfacial Tension

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    59/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Water Saturation

    Heig

    htAboveF

    reeWaterL

    evel

    High Tension

    Low Tension

    0 1.0

    Effect of Density Difference

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    60/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Water Saturation

    Small Density Difference

    LargeDensity

    DifferenceHeightAbove

    FreeWater

    Level

    0 1.0

    Uses of Capillary Pressure Data

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    61/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Determine initial water saturation in the reservoir

    Determine fluid distribution in reservoir

    Determine residual oil saturation for water flooding applications

    Determine pore size distribution index

    May help in identifying zones or rock types

    Input for reservoir simulation calculations.

    Capillary Pressure Data Using

    the Leverett J-Function

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    62/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    the Leverett J Function

    A universal capillary pressure

    curve is impossible to generate

    because of the variation ofproperties affecting capillary

    pressures in reservoir

    The Leverett J-function was

    developed in an attempt to

    convert all capillary pressuredata to a universal curve

    ( ) kP

    SJ c

    wcos

    22.0

    =

    Example J-Function for West Texas Carbonate

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    63/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    0.00

    1.00

    2.00

    3.00

    4.00

    5.00

    6.00

    7.00

    8.00

    9.00

    10.00

    0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

    Water saturation, fraction

    J-

    fun

    ction

    Jc

    Jmatch

    Jn1

    Jn2

    Jn3

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    64/97

    Capillarity Example 4Calculation of J-function

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    65/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    A v e r a g e d A ir /B r in e C a p illa r yP re s s u re D a ta

    Pcp s i a

    Sw%

    1 9 8 .32 9 8 .3

    4 9 6 .8

    8 5 9 .0

    1 5 3 6 .33 5 2 5 .4

    5 0 0 1 5 .3

    Capillarity Example 4Solution

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    66/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    CalculatedJ-Functions

    Sw%

    0.22*

    J(Sw)

    98.3 0.2298.3 0.43

    96.8 0.86

    59.0 1.7336.3 3.24

    25.4 7.57

    15.3 108.1

    Capillarity Example 4Solution

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    67/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    120

    100

    80

    60

    40

    0

    20

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    0.22*J

    (Sw

    )

    Sw , %

    Capillarity Example 5Estimating Pc from J-function

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    68/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    c

    Estimate capillary pressures from Leverett J-functioncalculated in Example 4 for a different core sample.

    Properties of core sample:

    k= 100 md

    = 10 %

    Capillarity Example 5Solution

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    69/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Estimated Capillary

    Pressures for the 100-mdPermeability Core Sample

    Sw,

    %

    Pc,

    psia98.3 2.27

    98.3 4.45

    96.8 8.91

    59.0 17.9136.3 36.90

    25.4 78.18

    15.3 1118.63

    Intro to the Relative Permeability Concept

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    70/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Permeability is a property of the porous medium and is a

    measure of the capacity of the medium to transmit fluids

    When the medium is completely saturated with one fluid, then

    the permeability measurement is often referred to as

    absolute permeability

    Calculating Absolute Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    71/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Absolute permeability is often calculated from the flowequation:

    L

    pAkq

    =

    Effective Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    72/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    When the rock pore spaces contain more than one fluid,

    then the permeability to a particular fluid is called the

    effective permeability

    Effective permeability is a measure of the fluid

    conductance capacity of a porous medium to a particularfluid when the medium is saturated with more than one

    fluid

    Calculating Effective Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    73/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    L

    pAk

    qo

    oeo

    o

    =Oil

    Water

    Gas

    LpAkq

    w

    weww

    =

    L

    pAkq

    g

    geg

    g

    =

    Relative Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    74/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Relative permeability is defined as the ratio of the

    effective permeability to a fluid at a given saturation to abase permeability

    The base permeability is commonly taken as the effective

    permeability to the fluid at 100% saturation (absolutepermeability) or the effective non-wetting phasepermeability at irreducible wetting phase saturation

    Calculating Relative Permeabilities

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    75/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    k

    kk eo

    ro

    =Oil

    Water

    Gas

    kkk ewrw =

    k

    kk

    eg

    rg =

    Fundamental Concepts

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    76/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Water phase

    Water is located in smaller pore spaces and along sandgrains

    Therefore, relative permeability to water is a function of water

    saturation only (i.e., it does not matter what the relative

    amounts of oil and gas are)

    Thus, we can plot relative permeability to water against watersaturation on Cartesian coordinate paper

    Fundamental Concepts

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    77/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Oil phase

    Oil is located between water and gas in the pore spaces, and to

    a certain extent, in the smaller pores

    Thus, relative permeability to oil is a function of oil, water, and

    gas saturations If the water saturation can be considered constant (i.e., the

    minimum interstitial water saturation), then kro can be plotted

    against So on Cartesian coordinate paper

    Fundamental Concepts

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    78/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Gas phase

    Gas is located in the center of the larger pores Therefore, the relative permeability to gas is a function of

    gas saturation only (i.e., it does not matter what the

    relative amounts of oil and water are)

    Thus ,we can plot krg against Sg (or Sw + So) on Cartesiancoordinate paper

    Common Multi-Phase Flow Systems

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    79/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Water-oil systems

    Oil-gas systemsWater-gas systems

    Three phase systems (water, oil, and gas)

    Relative Permeability Exercise 1

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    80/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    What are the relative permeability data sets we need to

    use for the following situations? Water flooding an oil reservoir above the bubble point

    Production from an oil reservoir with a gas-cap andwater aquifer

    Relative Permeability Exercise 1Solution

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    81/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    For water flooding an oil reservoir above the bubble

    point : Water-oil relative permeability

    For three phase flow : Water-oil relative permeability

    Gas-oil (or gas-liquid) relative permeability 3 phase relative permeability

    Oil-Water Relative Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    82/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    40

    0

    20

    400 1006020 80

    Water Saturation (%)

    Re

    lativePermeability(%)

    100

    60

    80

    Waterkrw@ Sor

    Oil

    Two-Phase FlowRegion

    Irreducible

    Water

    Saturation

    kro @ Swi

    Residual Oil

    Saturation

    Oil-Gas Relative Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    83/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    40

    0

    20

    400 1006020 80

    Total Liquid Saturation - % of Pore Volume

    RelativeP

    ermeabilit

    y(%)

    100

    60

    80

    Gaskro

    Oil

    krg

    SL = So + Swi

    Relative Permeability Exercise 2

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    84/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    0.4

    0

    0.2

    400 1006020 80

    Water Saturation (% PV)

    RelativePermeability,Frac

    tion

    1.0

    0.6

    0.8 (1)

    (2)

    Importance of Relative Permeability Data

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    85/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Relative permeability data affect the flow characteristics of

    reservoir fluids.Relative permeability data affect the recovery of oil and/or

    gas.

    Relative Permeability Example 3Effect of Relative Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    86/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Water Saturation (%)

    Rela

    tivePerm

    eability(

    %)

    Rock Type 2

    Rock Type 1

    Relative Permeability Example 3Effect of Relative Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    87/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0 2 4 6 8 10

    Pore Volumes Injected

    Perce

    ntofRec

    overable

    Oil

    Rock Type 1Rock Type 2

    Factors Affecting Effective and RelativePermeabilities

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    88/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Fluid saturations

    Geometry of the rock pore spaces and grain size distribution

    Rock wettability

    Fluid saturation history (i.e., imbibition or drainage)

    Effect of Wettability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    89/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    0.4

    0

    0.2

    400 1006020 80

    Water Saturation (% PV)

    RelativePermeability,Fraction

    1.0

    0.6

    0.8

    Water

    Oil

    Strongly Water-Wet Rock

    0.4

    0

    0.2

    400 1006020 80

    Water Saturation (% PV)

    RelativePermeability,Fraction

    1.0

    0.6

    0.8

    WaterOil

    Strongly Oil-Wet Rock

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    90/97

    Effect of Saturation History

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    91/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Drainage

    Imbibition

    Wetting Phase Saturation, % PV

    R

    elativePermeability,%

    Residual non-wetting

    phase saturation

    Interstitial wetting

    phase saturation

    Choosing the Right Curve

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    92/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    When simulating the waterflood of a water-wet reservoir

    rock, imbibition relative permeability curves should beused.

    When modeling gas injection into an oil reservoir, drainagerelative permeability curves should be used.

    Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    93/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    100% Gas

    100% Oil100% Water

    Relative Permeability to Water in a Three-PhaseSystem

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    94/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    100% Gas

    100% Water 100% Oil

    0%

    10%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    krw= 80%

    Relative Permeability to Oil in a Three-Phase System

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    95/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    100% Gas

    100% Water 100% Oil

    5%

    10%20%

    30%

    40%

    kro = 50%

    Uses of Effective and Relative Permeability

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    96/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    Reservoir simulation

    Flow calculations that involve multi-phase flow in

    reservoirs

    Estimation of residual oil (and/or gas) saturation

    References

  • 8/11/2019 C (I-1B) Reservoir Fundam Fluid Flow

    97/97

    Copyright 2008, NExT, All rights reserved

    1. Amyx, J.W., Bass, D.M., and Whiting, R.L.: Petroleum Reservoir

    Engineering, McGrow-Hill Book Company New York, 1960.

    2. Tiab, D. and Donaldson, E.C.: Petrophysics, Gulf Publishing

    Company, Houston, TX. 1996.

    3. Dandekar, A. Petroleum Reservoir Rock and Fluid Properties,

    Taylor and Francis, 2006.