15
7 優塡王式 불입상형성·복제 그리고 확산 임영애 I. 머리말 통일신라 불입상의 주름은 알려진 대로 가지 형식으로 나뉜다 . Y자형 U자형 이다 1 , 2 . 우리는 Y자형 주름을 통칭 우전왕( 優塡王, Udyana ) ’, U자형 주름을 아소카왕( 阿育王 , Asoka ) 이라 부른다 . 1 Y자형 주름이란 U모양의 주름이 가슴부터 아래까지 이어지다가 양쪽 리부터 Y모양으로 서로 갈라져 양다리 위로 각각 주름이 흘러내리는 형식이며 , U 자형 주름은 반원의 동심원이 가슴부터 무릎 아래까지 물결치듯 이어져 내려 오는 형식을 말한다 . Y자형 주름을 가진 대표 예로 언급되는 상이 바로 719 년경 감산사 아미타불입상과 국립경주박물관의 사암불입상이며 , 외에도 없이 많은 통일신라 금동불입상에서 유사한 모양의 주름을 찾아볼 있다 . 2 * 필자의 최근 논저: 석굴암 사천왕상의 도상과 불교 경전 」, 강좌미술사37 , 2011 . 12; 신라 불탑 탑신( 塔身) 부조상의 추이: 금강역사상에서 사천왕상으로 」, 先史古代35 , 2011 . 12; 황룡사 중금당 佛眷屬 16존상의 복원: 불제자상 , 금강역사상과 獅子像 그리고 공양자상」, 신라사학보38, 신라사학회, 2011 . 12; 삼단팔각 연화대좌의 통일신라 수용과 전개」, 신라문화』, 2011 . 8; 북방 多聞天그의 持物 寶塔: 원과 고려 이전 양상」, 미술사와 시각문화9 , 미술사와 시각문화 학회, 2010 . 10 . 1 Alexander Soper , Chinese , Korean and Japanese bronzes : a catalogue of the auriti collection donated to IsMEO and preserved in the museo nazionale d arte orientale in Roma( Roma: IsMEO, 1966), pp . 37-39; 영원한 생명의 울림 통일신라 조각』( 국립중앙박물 , 2008 ), p . 222. 2 감산사 아미타불입상과 사암불입상의 주름에 관해서는 김리나 , 신라 감산사여래식 불상의 美術史論壇 342012. 6 林玲愛 慶州大學校 文化財學科 敎授 梨花女子大學校 美術史學科 博士 佛敎美術史

優塡王式 - casasia.orgae).pdf · 2015-04-18 · 특징을 분명히 제시하고 있다. 바로 그 우전왕 불입상은 부처님 열반 후 코샴비국에. 서 호탄 북쪽의

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview


I.
.
‘Y’ ‘U’1, 2. ‘Y’ ‘(, Udyana)’, ‘U’ ‘(, Asoka)’ .1
‘Y’ U
‘Y’ ,
‘U’
. ‘Y’ 719
,
.2
* : , 37, 2011. 12; () : , 35, 2011. 12; 16 : , , 38, , 2011. 12; , , 2011. 8; : , 9, , 2010. 10.
1 Alexander Soper, Chinese, Korean and Japanese bronzes: a catalogue of the auriti collection donated to IsMEO and preserved in the museo nazionale d’arte orientale in Roma(Roma: IsMEO, 1966), pp.37-39; ( , 2008), p.222.
2 ,
34 2012. 6
8 ‘ ’ · 9
? ‘
’ .
‘Y’ ‘’
.
‘’ ,
, ?
‘’ ‘ ’
. ‘’
, ‘ ’ ‘’ ‘’
‘Y’ .
. ‘’
.
, .3
90
.4
‘’ ‘’ .
.5 ‘’
,
.6
3 ‘ ’ . T2087 05:0898a.
4 28, 6, , .; , ‘’ , 55(, 2008), pp.23-
32 . 5 , Alexander C. Soper, “The Sandalwood First
Image”, Literary Evidence for Early Buddhist Art in China(Ascona: artibus Asiae Publishers, 1959), p.259; Martha L. Carter, “The Mystery of the Udayana Buddha,” Annali vol.50(Naples: Istituto universitario orientale, 1990), pp.1-43 .
6 3
‘U’ .
, .
‘Y’ 985 ()
, ‘’
.
‘Y’ ‘’
. ‘’
? ‘’ ,
, (, 1989), p.210; , , 123·124(1976. 12), pp.41-43 .
1
(,2011, 70)
(,2011, 70)
10 ‘ ’ · 11
.
.
.


. ()
7
.
. .
.
.



.9
‘’
.
.
,

. ,
.
(Phema), [] []
(Uzun-Tati) .10
9 T2087 12:945b 12 …… …… …… ; T2053 5:245c 5 .
10 Uzun-
Tati . A. Stein, Sand-buried Ruins of Khotan: Personal
‘’ . (602~664)
.
60 ,
. ,
, .

. ,
.7
,
.
, .

. ‘
’, ‘

.

.
,
. 12
.8
30 .
[]
. , .
7 T2087 5:0898a 5 . 8 , , , (: , 1990), pp.1026-
1027; ·, , (: , 1965), pp.186-188; , , (, 1983), pp.364-365.
12 ‘ ’ · 13
50km
. 1901 5
, 1928
.16
3.17
, ‘
, ’
. ‘ ’ 100
547 .18
16 A. Stein, (1907), pp.482-506; Gerd Gropp, Archäologische Funde aus Khotan, Chinesisch -Ostturkestan. Die Trinkler-Sammlung im Übersee-Museum, Bremen(Bremen: Verlag Friedrich Röver, 1974). pp.221-240.
17 91 , R.29 2.5cm . A. Stein, (1907), p.496.
18 T2092 05:1018 5 ‘ ’ , ‘ ’ . , , (, 2001), pp.182-183.
.
644 . 100
5,000 .11 7~8
.
.
.
,

.
644 6~7
.
,
‘’ . ‘’
‘ ’ .12
‘(rauraka, roruka)’ ‘’ , ‘r’
‘l’ .13
‘’ ‘ro’ ‘rau’ , ‘’ ‘ruka’ ‘raka’
. ,
(rauraka), (roraka) .14
.
, ‘’
.15
Narrative of a Journey of Archaeological and Geographical Exploration in Chinese Turkestan(London: Hurst and Blackett, 1904), pp.439-440; A.Stein, Ancient Khotan: Detailed Report of Archaeological Explorations in Chinese Turkestan, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907), pp.285-286 , , (1990), pp.1028-1029; , (: , 1984), pp.260-261; , ,, 2(1981) .
11 T2087 12:943a 12 . 12 , , 25:10(1922), pp.209-225. 13 , , 1(1928), pp.102-103; , , (1990), p.1029.
14 , , 100(1978), p.65. 15 , (, 1996), pp.144-146.
3
(Aurel Stein, Ancient Khotan Vol., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907, pl.17-b)
14 ‘ ’ · 15
, ‘

,
4.21 6
.
6

.

5.22
4, 118

5
.23
.24
6
.
.25 7~8


.26
21 (A.Stein, (1904), p.449; A.Stein, (1907), p.483), . A.Stein, (1904), pp.451-452; A.Stein, (1907), p.488.
22 A.Stein, (1907), pp.500-501. 23 , (, 2007), pp.64-82. 24 A.Stein, (1907), pp.500-501. 25 . Joanna Williams, “The Iconography of Khotanese Paintings,” East & West, vol.23(1973), pp.109-154; , , 16(2011), pp.105-129.
26 7 , -(Domoko-Yar) -- 6(F) . 7~8 . , , · , 15: (:
“ .
.
.
.


, .
. 19(493),
2(501), 2(513) .19

’ , .
414 ,
.20

.
19 , , (2001), pp.182. 20 T2085 1:857a~858a .
4
5

(Susan Whitfield, The Silk Road–Trade, Travel, War and Faith, London: British Library, 2004, 34a-i)
16 ‘ ’ · 17
.30
.
.
7~8

.31
7 , , ,

.32 7
, ,
.
‘’ .
, .
,
.
‘’
.
, .
. 6
(655) 7 7.33
30 T2053 6:252b 6. 31 T2053 5:245c 5. 32 . Robert L. Brown, “Expected miracles: the unsurprisingly miraculous nature of Buddhist images and relics,” Images, miracles, and authority in Asian religious traditions, Boulder(Colorado: Westview Press, 1998), pp.24-27.
33 , - , (, 1985-4), pp.102-106 ; , ( , 2010) .

. 1900

.27

.
.

‘ ’
‘ ’ .


14.28
645 1 .
7 ‘ ’ .29 645 1 26
150, 7, 657
, 1999), p.282. 5 5~6 .
27 , (1996), pp.142-146. 28 , (1996), pp.276-286. 29 (T2052 1:2147a) ‘’ · ( )6(T2053 6:252b) 7 . 7 . , -, 3, 48(, 2003), pp.153-168; , 7 , (, 2007), pp.83-99.
6
,: , 2009, 23)
18 ‘ ’ · 19
. ()

657
655 , 663

, ‘ ’



.38


.39
645
.


645
.40 , 200 839
231, 237
, . 231 237
38, 41 , ,
.41 ‘ ’ ‘’
8, 9.42 , ,
38 , (1988. 3), p.108; , (2006), p.45; 3 . 39 , (2002), pp.156-157; , (2010), p.82. 40 , (2003), pp.156-157; , , p.213. 41 27 . 12 10,
220 30, 231 38, 237 41 . , 12 : (: 2000), p.106.
42 , “”, , (: , 1993), pp.212-279.
42 70 ,
,
.34
645 45cm ‘ ’ ?
, .
,
.35
5 8~9
. 7
, 7 20~30 .
645
‘’
.36

.

.37 ,
. 340

34 . , (1985), pp.102-106; 35 46 . , (2010), pp.123-128 .
35 , , 120(1986), pp.92-93; , , 177(1988. 3), pp.61-74 ; , (2003), pp.153- 168; , , 287(2006), pp.45-72; ‘ ’ , (2010), p.82 . . , (2010), pp.12-17. , , (1985), pp.102-106; , , 60(1988), pp.199-397; , - , -2(: , 1996-4), pp.26-39.
36 , (, 2003), p.214. 37 , (2010), pp.78-81.
7

306 6(655) 113cm ( , 2,: , 2002, 220)
20 ‘ ’ · 21
.


.
200 . 270~280cm
, 160~180cm ·
.
.
, ,
10.
U ‘Y’
5~6 .46
(440~450)
(477~499) . <4(443)
>, <486 >11, <13, 19(489, 495)
46 , 5 . , (1996), p.143; , (Khotan ) (Rawak) , 198(1991), pp.45-58; Marylin Martin Rhie, Early Buddhist Art of China and Central Asia 2(Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2002), pp.276-316 .

.43
, ,
.44 237 ‘ ’
. 231
38
.
,
231
‘Y’ .

,45




.
.
, ,

.

.
43 231 ‘Y’ .
44 . Alexander C. Soper, “Representations of Famous Images at Tun-huang,” Artibus Asiae 27(1965), pp.352-361.
45 , (1986), pp.82-83.
8
9
10

5 (Ancient Khotan, vol.3, 1907, pl. 16b)
22 ‘ ’ · 23
50 .48
‘Y’ 5
.
‘’ . 4

, 6 ‘
’ ‘’ .
‘ ’ ‘Y’ ‘’ ,
‘’ .
48 ‘(316) (435~439) ’(114 10 20).
>12, <23(499) >13 ,
14.47
5
5, 439 9 .
.
(316) .
.
, . (435~439)

.
47 , , 11(1997), pp.45-66( (, 2008), pp.70-96 ).
13
(, 1, : , 1995, 91)
14
- (Serindia vol. 3, 1921, pl.295)
11
<> 486 140.3cm, (Angela Falco Howard, Li song, Wu Hung, Yang Hong, Chinese Sculpture, New Haven & London: Yale Univ. Press, 2006, pl.3-30)
12
<>
13, 19(489, 495) 370cm
24 ‘ ’ · 25
. ‘’

’ . ‘’ . 644
‘ ’
.
, 45cm . ‘’ ,
15.49
,
49 , , . , , no.513(: , 2009), pp.31-41.
‘Y’ .
,
U 3
, ‘Y’ 16.
() 15
,
.50 9
, 10~11
, ‘’
, 17.
‘Y’ .
‘Y’ ‘U’ , ‘Y
’ ‘U’ 8
. 719 18
8 ,
.
, , ,
,
1.51

, .52 8
‘’ ‘’
.
.
, ‘’ ( ) . (938~1016)
985 ,
50 20 Eumorphopoulos .
51 , , (, 1989), pp.180-184; , , pp.206-232 .
52 , (2008), pp.88-90.
15
<>
(, 3, , 1995, 679)
16
<>
79cm (- , , 1998~1999, 18)
17
18
( 10, , 1998, 100)
26 ‘ ’ · 27
. ‘’

, ‘Y’ ‘’
.53
.
,
5 19, 20.54
,
. ‘Y’
. 13
1249 , 21.55
53 Gregory Henderson & Leon Hurvitz, “The Buddha of Seiryji: New Finds and New Theory,” Artibus Asiae 19(Artibus Asiae Publishers, 1956), pp.5-21; , (2009), p.20.
54 . , (2009), pp.22- 28.
55 Donald F. McCallum, “The replication of miraculous images : the Zenkoji Amida and the Seiryoji Shaka”, , pp.207-226; , (937~975) (936~944) () 2(964) . (976~997)

18 . <>
, 1595 < >
22.56
’ ‘’
,

.
7
.
‘’
‘’
. 7~8 ‘Y’
‘’ 8 ‘Y’
‘’ ‘ ’
. 985
, ‘Y’ ‘’
.
. ( ) 1900 . , , ()( , 1982), p.9.
56 <> 1412 . (22). , 55 . . , (2009), pp.29-37.
19
22
< > (no.513, , 2009. 53)
28 ‘ ’ · 29
.
‘’ .
. 645
.

. 644
.
.

.
,
.
, ‘ ’
, ‘ ’
‘’ . 645

, ‘’
.57

, .
, ‘ ’
.
,
231, 237
57 , . Gregory Henderson & Leon Hurvitz, (1956), p.12; A.B.Griswold, “Prolegomena to the Study of the Buddha’s Dress in Chinese Sculpture,” Artibus Asiae 27-2(1963), pp.117-118; , , ( , 2004), pp.141-142. . , .
.58
.
,

.59

,
.
.
, 60 418~420
.60 689

699 80
.61
‘’ ‘Y’
. ‘’ ‘
’ . ,
, .
‘’ , ‘Y
=’ ‘Y > ’
.
‘’ .
58 T2053 5:245c 5. 59 1183 (Lii-Yul lu-bStan-Pa) . (T2087 12:943a), , (T2053 5:245c); W.W.Rockhill, The Life of the Buddha and the Early History of His Order(London:Kegan Paul, Trench,Trübner & Co. 1982), pp.233-237; , (, 1974), pp.16-20; Yamazaki Genichi(), “The Legend of the Foundation of Khotan,” The Memoirs of the Toyo Bunko, 48(1990), pp.6-16.
60 T278 60:788; , -, 17(1978), pp.88-93; , (: , 1937), pp.302-306.
61 T2154 9:566; , , -350(1980), pp.4-8.
30 ‘ ’ · 31


, , , , 1989.
, ‘’ , 55, , 2008.
, , , 2010.
, , 11,
, 1997. 10( , , 2008 )
, , , 1996.
, 7 , , , 2007.
, , , , 2004.
, - , 1985-4, , 1985.
, -, -2, : , 1996. 4.
, ,, , 1981 2.
, “”, , , : , 1993.
, , 177, 1988. 3. , -,
17, 1978.
, ,
,
.
.
‘’ , ‘Y’
‘’ ‘’ .
key words
Udyana image, Khotan, Rawak temple site, auspicious Image,
Gamsansa, Seryoji
2012 1 16 | 2012 3 26 | 2012 3 30

Formation, Copying, and Extension of
‘Udyana Style Standing Figures of Buddha’
Lim, Youngae
Though the ‘Udyana image’ exist in the literature, we have different reality
because there is no substantial evidence in India while we can find several
similar stories. However, Xuanzang heard a story of a Udyana image that had
been said to be delivered from Kausambi to Khotan when he visited the latter
in 644. This Udyana image was moved to Phema within Khotan after doing a
miracle at Rauraka[] within the same land of Khotan. This statue was
said to have a marvel power to the effect that one could completely cure his or
her lesions when he or she attach gold leaf sheets to the same parts of the statue
as his or her lesions. The place which Xuanzang referred to as Rauraka was
highly likely to be Rawak temple site, and the gold leaf sheets on the thigh and
knee sites discovered from the standing figure of Buddha in Rawak temple site
also suggest its close relationship with Udyana image. Judging from matters as
they stand, Udyana image from Kausambi that Xuanzang carried on his way
back to Tang in 645 would be in the same form as the standing figure of Buddha
of Rawak temple site, and the unique shapes of the ‘Udyana image’ handed
down to the present are highly likely to have originated from the form of the
standing figure of Buddha here in Khotan.
If Xuanzang’s record is true, Udyana image came to exist in Khotan, a
more excellent country than Kausambi, where it could not stay despite the
fact that it was the first place of the foundation of Udyana image. It seemed
that Khotan had been already recognized as a ‘significant place where India’
s auspicious image stayed’ when Xuanzang visited there. In the state-founding
120, 1986.
, , 287, 2006.
, , , 1974. , , -350, 1980. , , 25:10, 1922.
, , no.513, : , 2009.
, , 100, 1978.
, , (), :
A.Stein, Ancient Khotan: Detailed Report of Archaeological Explorations in
Chinese Turkestan, , Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.
A.Stein, Sand-buried Ruins of Khotan: Personal Narrative of a Journey of
Archaeological and Geographical Exploration in Chinese Turkestan,
London: Hurst and Blackett, 1904.
Alexander C. Soper, “Representations of Famous Images at Tun-huang”,
Artibus Asiae 27, 1965.
Alexander C. Soper, “The Sandalwood First Image”, Literary Evidence for
Early Buddhist Art in China, Ascona: artibus Asiae Publishers, 1959.
Alexander Soper, Chinese, Korean and Japanese bronzes : a catalogue of
the auriti collection donated to IsMEO and preserved in the museo
nazionale d’arte orientale in Roma, Roma: IsMEO, 1966.
Martha L. Carter, “The Mystery of the Udayana Buddha” Annali vol. 50,
Naples: Istituto universitario orientale, 1990.
Marylin Martin Rhie, Early Buddhist Art of China and Central Asia 2, Leiden: E.
J. Brill, 2002.
of Buddhist images and relics”, Images, miracles, and authority in
Asian religious traditions, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1998.
Yamazaki Genichi(), “The Legend of the Foundation of Khotan”,
The Memoirs of the Toyo Bunko, 48, 1990.
ABSTRACT
34 ‘ ’ · 35
myth of Khotan, another auspicious king, Asoka appears. Of course, the whole
story would have been devised by Khotan people in order to give authority
to the nation, and the security of the legitimacy of Khotan as the center of
Buddhism could have serve as an important factor.
Khotan recognized and embodied the ‘Udyana image’ that had existed
only in legends as an auspicious image. Since then, Udyana image have just
been copied and extended only with its rimples in a special form while losing
not only its original identity but also its mysterious powers. In other words,
Udyana image has left only the ‘Y-shaped’ rimples, being separated from its
original context. We have called them ‘Udyana style rimples’ so far without any
great meaning, and after all those standing figures of Buddha with ‘Y-shaped’
rimples have got the label of ‘Udyana style’ in separation with the ‘Udyana
image’.