Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Clarification or Land Grab? How EPA’s Proposal to Redefine “Water” to Include Dry Land Expands Agency Jurisdiction Beyond Historical Limits. By Steve C. Morasch Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt. New definition of “water”:. The EPA published a new definition of “water” for comment . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Clarification or Land Grab?How EPA’s Proposal to Redefine “Water” to
Include Dry LandExpands Agency Jurisdiction Beyond
Historical Limits
BySteve C. Morasch
Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
New definition of “water”:• The EPA published a new definition of “water” for
comment.• The definition determines the EPA and Army
Corps of Engineers jurisdiction for a variety of regulatory programs under the Clean Water Act, including: – Section 404 dredge and fill– Section 402 pollution control (NPDES)
• Comment period expires November 14, 2014
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
What is “water”?• Clean Water Act adopted in 1972• Regulates only the "navigable" waters of the United
States • Traditionally, a "navigable" water was large enough
to float a boat used in commerce
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Over the years. . . EPA and Corps (with help of the courts) expanded
the definition of "navigable" far beyond any traditional concept of navigation
Agencies often seek to regulate land that is sometimes saturated with water
(from majority leader Kevin McCarthy’s webpage)
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
What’s the issue?
Water runs downhill, gathering pollutants along the way
Effort to stop pollution at its source by regulating the outer capillaries of the system
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Local vs Federal control
• Many argue that the capillaries of the system are adequately protected by local regulations
– Washington has the GMA critical areas protections and SMA, which require habitat protection; Oregon has statewide planning goals 5, 6, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19
• Definition of “water” applies to more than just water quality regulations
– Also applies to dredge and fill rules
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Proposed rule has been broadly criticized. . .House Appropriations committee chair Harold Rogers called the new rule “the biggest land grab in history”
Groups opposed to the rule include: American Farm Bureau Pacific Legal Foundation Waters Advocacy Coalition National Council of Farmer Cooperatives Agricultural Retailers Association Congressional Western Caucus
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Proposed rule also opposed in its current form by
• Pacific Northwest Waterways Association (PNWA)
• National Waterways Conference (NWC)
• American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Bipartisan opposition
• Opposed by both democrats and republicans
• H.R. 5078 passed the House with bipartisan support, and a vote of 262 to 152
• Bill prohibits EPA and ACOE from redefining “water” without consensus
• President Obama threatens veto
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
The proposed rule is supported by
• The Obama administration
• Environmental groups
• Seven state AG’s, including Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
How do we sort out the truth?
The Obama administration claims the “land grab” is a myth. . .
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Let’s start with the Supreme Court decisions:
•2001: Solid Waste Agency of NorthernCook County (SWANCC) v. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
•2006: Rapanos v. United States
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
SWANCC v. ACOE (2001)
Case involved “isolated waters” – not traditionally navigable, not adjacent or tributary to a navigable water, in this case an abandoned gravel pit
Court held “migratory bird rule” - whether a bird lands there – did not create CWA jurisdiction
Court’s broad rationale cast doubt on CWA jurisdiction over any “isolated waters”
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Rapanos v. United States (2006)• The Court noted that these agencies had, over
the years, attempted to expand their jurisdiction to "any plot of land" containing a drainage "channel or conduit – whether man-made or natural, broad or narrow, permanent or ephemeral – through which rainwater or drainage may occasionally or intermittently flow"
• EPA and Corps not authorized to undertake such an "immense" expansion of their jurisdiction
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
The Rapanos case involved. . .
• four Michigan wetlands
• which lie near ditches or man-made drains
• that eventually empty into traditional navigable waters
• located some 11 to 20 miles away
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
For filling these wetlands without a federal permit. . .
John Rapanos faced 63 months in prison
And hundreds of thousands of dollars in criminal and civil fines
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Cost of wetland permitting in the U.S. in 2006
Average applicant for an individual permit spends: 788 days (over two years) $271,596 in permitting and consulting fees Plus the cost of mitigating for the loss of the
wetlands
Over $1.7 billion is spent each year in the process of obtaining federal wetland permits in the U.S.
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Rapanos holding:
Court rules in favor of Mr. Rapanos, stating:• Corps stretched the term ‘waters of the United
States' beyond parody • CWA does not authorize 'Land is Waters'
approach to federal jurisdiction
Given the clear and unambiguous language of the Rapanos decision, why does EPA claim the Court created uncertainty?
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
No majority (4/1/4 decision)
Rapanos was a plurality decision
Four justices joined the plurality
Justice Kennedy concurred but for different reasons (the “significant nexus” test)
Four justices dissented
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
The EPA draft rule expands on the “significant nexus” test from Justice Kennedy’s concurrence:
“Significant nexus" – not a scientific term:
• It’s a legal term
• Defined in the draft rule with broad sweeping language
• Includes any connection to a "navigable" water that is "more than speculative or insubstantial"
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
In simple terms, the draft rule defines “water” to include:• Traditionally navigable waters, like navigable
lakes, rivers and seas
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
In simple terms, the draft rule defines “water” to include:• Traditionally navigable waters, like navigable
lakes, rivers and seas• Interstate waters and wetlands
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
In simple terms, the draft rule defines “water” to include:• Traditionally navigable waters, like navigable
lakes, rivers and seas• Interstate waters and wetlands• Tributaries of navigable waters
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
In simple terms, the draft rule defines “water” to include:• Traditionally navigable waters, like navigable
lakes, rivers and seas• Interstate waters and wetlands• Tributaries of navigable waters • Waters that are “adjacent” to navigable waters
or their tributaries
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
In simple terms, the draft rule defines “water” to include:• Traditionally navigable waters, like navigable
lakes, rivers and seas• Interstate waters and wetlands• Tributaries of navigable waters • Waters that are “adjacent” to navigable waters
or their tributaries• Waters that have a “significant nexus” to
traditionally navigable waters
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Tributaries are defined broadly:
• Includes wetlands, lakes and ponds– even if they lack a bed and banks or a ordinary high
water mark
• Any water that flows directly or indirectly into a navigable or interstate water
– any hydrological connection is a tributary
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Adjacent waters
• No hydrological connection required
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Adjacent waters include:• Waters that are bordering, contiguous or
neighboring to a navigable water or a tributary
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Adjacent waters include:• Waters that are bordering, contiguous or
neighboring to a navigable water or a tributary• Waters, including wetlands that are separated
from navigable waters or tributaries by man made dikes or barriers, natural berm, beach dunes, etc.
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Adjacent waters include:• Waters that are bordering, contiguous or
neighboring to a navigable water or a tributary• Waters, including wetlands that are separated
from navigable waters or tributaries by man made dikes or barriers, natural berm, beach dunes, etc.
• “Neighboring” waters that are located within the riparian area or floodplain of a navigable water or tributary or that have a hydrological connection to such waters
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Significant Nexus means:
• A water or wetland
• That alone or in combination with other waters
• Significantly affects the chemical, physical or biological integrity of a navigable water
The effect need only be “more than speculative or insubstantial”
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Significant Nexus waters are:
• Evaluated on a case by case basis
• Highly discretionary with the agency
• Viewed “in combination” with other waters
So, individually, a significant nexus water might only have an insubstantial effect, but if it is combined with other waters that have a “significant” affect as a whole, it will still be regulated
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
The only clarity in the proposed rule is the exemptionsWaste Treatment Systems that meet the CWA are exempt
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Exemptions
Prior Converted Cropland
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Exemptions
Prior Converted CroplandWhat about ditches?
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Exemptions
Prior Converted CroplandWhat about ditches?
• EPA has authority to override other agencies’ determinations about prior conversion to cropland
• Normal farming operations on existing farms are exempt from dredge and fill permits under 40 CFR 232.3(c)(1)
• Farming activities not be exempt from water quality rules
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Ditches exempt?
Only ditches with no hydrological connection are exempt:
• Ditches that are excavated wholly in uplands, drain only uplands and do not have perennial flow
• Ditches that do not contribute flow, either directly or indirectly to a navigable or interstate water
A ditch that touches a wetland or that eventually flows into a navigable water, no matter how remote, is NOT exempt.
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Exemptions continued:
Artificially irrigated uplands
are exempt
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Exemptions continued:Artificial lakes or ponds created from uplands and used exclusively for stock watering, irrigation, settling basins or rice growing are exempt
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Exemptions continued:• Artificial reflecting or swimming pools created out of dry
uplands are exempt
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Exemptions continued:
Small ornamental ponds in dry uplands are exempt
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Exemptions continued:
• Water filled depressions created incidental to construction activity are exempt
• Groundwater is exempt
• Gullies, rills and non-wetland swales are exempt
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Conclusion:
Outside of these narrow exemptions, the draft rule broadly defines “waters” to allow EPA and ACOE great discretion to assert CWA jurisdiction over virtually any piece of land that, when viewed in combination with other lands, has anything more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on navigable waters.
www.schwabe.com
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C.
Questions?
Comment period expires November 14, 2014
