25
By: John Marron Nicole Scamuffo JOLLY RANCHERS

By: John Marron Nicole Scamuffo

  • Upload
    hewitt

  • View
    75

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

JOLLY RANCHERS. By: John Marron Nicole Scamuffo. DESCRIPTION OF TOPIC. Distribution of color Time it takes to dissolve: w arm vs. cold water stirring vs. not stirring . HISTORY OF JOLLY RANCHERS . Originally produced by Jolly Rancher Company - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

By: John MarronNicole Scamuffo

JOLLY RANCHERS

Page 2: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• Distribution of color • Time it takes to

dissolve:–warm vs. cold water–stirring vs. not

stirring

DESCRIPTION OF TOPIC

Page 3: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• Originally produced by Jolly Rancher Company – Founded in 1949 by Bill and Dorothy Harmsen

• Sold to Beatrice Foods in 1966• Purchased by Leaf Candy Company in 1983• 1996 Hershey bought the Jolly Rancher Candy

Company

HISTORY OF JOLLY RANCHERS

Page 4: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• We used the “original” Jolly Rancher which contain 5 flavors:

NEED TO KNOW

Blue RaspberryCherryGrapeGreen AppleWatermelon

Page 5: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• 1 bag of Jolly Ranchers from 3 stores = 3 bags– Each bag is estimated

to have 66 hard candies

– Claimed that the colors are evenly distributed within bags

• Grouped colors together from all 3 bags

OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Page 6: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

CHI- SQUARED GRAPH

Color Distribution Purple Red Green Pink Blue0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Genuardi'sWegmans Target

Page 7: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• Larger overall total:– Red and blue

• Smallest overall total:– Purple

• Green and pink have around same count• Different stores have different amounts • Based off of this data we feel;

– Jolly Rancher company doesn’t fill the bags evenly

ANALYSIS & CONCLUSION

Page 8: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

STATE• SRS• All expected counts

≥ 5

CHI-SQUARE GOODNESS OF FITASSUMPTIONS

CHECK• assumed• All expected counts

≥ 5

Page 9: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• Ho: the observed frequency distribution of Jolly Rancher color fits the expected distribution

• Ha: the observed frequency distribution of Jolly Rancher color doesn’t fit the expected distribution

P(x2> 1.0456 Idf =4) = 0.903• We fail to reject Ho because the p-value >α= 0.05• We have sufficient evidence that the observed

frequency distribution of Jolly Rancher color fits the expected distribution

CHI-SQUARE GOODNESS OF FIT

Page 10: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

1. Determine whether candy dissolves faster in hot water or cold water – Heated up half in the

microwave for 5 minutes and refrigerated other half

WARM VS. COLD

Page 11: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

2. Place 50 jolly ranchers into plastic cups that hold ¼ cup of warm water

3. Place 50 jolly ranchers into plastic cups that hold ¼ cup of cold water– Used calc for random sample

WARM VS. COLD

Page 12: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

4. Record the amount of time it takes for each jolly rancher to dissolve in the water

5. Perform a 2 sample t-test

WARM VS. COLD

Page 13: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

2 SAMPLE T-TEST GRAPH

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55hot_water_not_stirring

Jolly Rancher Box Plot

60 65 70 75 80 85 90cold_water_not_stirring

Jolly Rancher Box Plot

Jolly Rancherhot_water_not_stirring

38.96922.6735.2240.6942.43

50.57.21

S1 = meanS2 = minS3 = Q1S4 = medianS5 = Q3S6 = maxS7 = iqr

Jolly Ranchercold_water_not_stirring

75.038461.4

71.9174.2976.2387.464.32

S1 = meanS2 = minS3 = Q1S4 = medianS5 = Q3S6 = maxS7 = iqr

Page 14: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• As you can see in the two box plots:

ANALYSIS & CONCLUSION

Hot water:Minimum: 22.69 –outlier Maximum: 50.5Mean: 30.97Q1: 35.22Q3: 42.43IQR: 7.21

•Hot water graph is left skewed •Cold water graph is symmetric•Based off of the graphs , we believe that it takes longer for a Jolly Rancher to dissolve in cold water than it take for one to dissolve in warm water

Cold water:Minimum: 61.4 –outlier Maximum: 87.46—outlier Mean: 75.04Q1: 71.91Q3: 76.23IQR: 4.32

** cold water seemed to have a lot of outliers

Page 15: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

STATE • 2 independent SRS• 2 normal pops or

n1 and n2 ≥ 30

• S1= S2

2 SAMPLE T-TEST (pooled)ASSUMPTIONS

CHECK• Assumed • n1 and n2 ≥ 30

N1 = 50 N2 = 50

• 5.6 = 5.1

Page 16: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

Ho: µw = µc

Ha: µw < µc

P(t> -33.44 I df = 98 ) = < 0.0001 • We reject Ho because the p-value is < α= 0.05.• We have sufficient evidence that the mean of dissolving a

Jolly Rancher in warm water is less than the mean of dissolving a Jolly Rancher in cold water

2 SAMPLE T-TEST POOLED

Page 17: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

1. Heated up water for 5 minutes

2. Placed ¼ cup of water into 30 plastic cups containing 1 Jolly Rancher

3. Stirred water with a plastic knife until J.R dissolved

STIRRING VS. NOT STIRRING

Page 18: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

4. Recorded times 5. Perform 2 sample t-test

to determine if stirring has an effect on the amount of time the candy took to dissolve– reused warm water data

STIRRING VS. NOT STIRRING

Page 19: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

STIRRING VS. NOT STIRRING GRAPH

18 20 22 24 26 28Stirring_in_warm_water

Jolly Rancher Box Plot

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55hot_water_not_stirring

Jolly Rancher Box Plot

Jolly RancherStirring_in_warm_water

23.530318.0421.66

23.97525.6

27.593.94

S1 = meanS2 = minS3 = Q1S4 = medianS5 = Q3S6 = maxS7 = iqr

Jolly Rancherhot_water_not_stirring

38.96922.6735.2240.6942.4350.57.21

S1 = meanS2 = minS3 = Q1S4 = medianS5 = Q3S6 = maxS7 = iqr

Page 20: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• The graphs show that:

• Both graphs are left skewed– Stirring = more clustered and a more extreme skew

• Based off of the data we feel that a Jolly Rancher will dissolve faster in warm water while being stirred rather than just sitting in the warm water

ANALYSIS & CONCLUSION

Hot water:Minimum: 22.69 –outlier Maximum: 50.5Mean: 30.97Q1: 35.22Q3: 42.43IQR: 7.21

Hot water + stirring:Minimum: 18.04 Maximum: 27.59Mean: 23.53Q1: 21.66Q3: 25.6IQR: 3.94

Page 21: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

STATE • 2 independent SRS

• 2 normal pops or • n1 and n2 ≥ 30

2 SAMPLE T-TESTASSUMPTIONS

CHECK• Assumed

• n1 and n2 ≥ 30

• N1 = 50

• N2 = 30

Page 22: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

Ho: µw = µs

Ha: µw > µs

P(t> -16.57 I df = 73.469 ) = < 0.0001• We reject Ho because the p- value is < α= 0.05.• We have sufficient evidence that the mean of dissolving a Jolly

Rancher in warm water without stirring is greater than the mean of dissolving a Jolly Rancher in warm water while stirring

2 SAMPLE T-TEST

= -16.57

Page 23: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• Applies to people who purchase Jolly Ranchers– Getting a good deal—colors seem to be equally

distributed • Melt faster in a warm environment (mouth)

APPLICATION

Page 24: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• 1st study– only took bags from Buck County area– Most likely same

distribution center• 2nd test– water

temperature changed as it sat– Both ended up at room

temp• 3rd test– different stirring

techniques

BIAS/ERROR

Page 25: By: John  Marron Nicole  Scamuffo

• Too much work to do in too little time– Not every store had Jolly Ranchers

• Jolly Ranchers took too long to dissolve – Cold water took over an hour

• Surprised at the time difference between the temperature waters

PERSONAL OPINIONS