Upload
penny
View
41
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Business-to-Business Marketing Media Markets. Haas School of Business UC Berkeley Fall 2008 Week 12 Zsolt Katona. 1. Overview. Week 12 Media Markets (Two-sided markets) Second Life Week 13 B2B E-Marketplaces Industrat Decision 9 Week 14 Online Marketing and B2B - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
11
Business-to-Business MarketingMedia Markets
Haas School of BusinessUC Berkeley
Fall 2008Week 12
Zsolt Katona
2
Overview
• Week 12– Media Markets (Two-sided markets)– Second Life
• Week 13– B2B E-Marketplaces– Industrat Decision 9
• Week 14– Online Marketing and B2B– Industrat Decision 10
• Week 15– Pricing in Industrial Markets
XM Satellite Radio – What Happened?
• Launched in September 2001– first operational satellite service (beat Sirius)
• Hugh Panero: “I am proud to announce that after being fully national for only 56 days, XM has over 30k subscribers… will people pay for radio? The answer is a resounding ‘YES’.”
• 2001: “Product of the Year” (Fortune), “Invention of the Year” (Time)
• XM fastest-selling audio product in 20 years (based on first 3 months)
XM Satellite Radio– What Happened (cont.)
• XM launched with a $10 subscription price (combination of competitive pressure + advertising analysis)
• XM aired with ads: 4-6 minutes on about half of music channels (35 channels with ads) 7-9 minutes on talk and third-party programming, like CNN (XM believed other value propositions were far more important than
completely ad free, consumers won’t mind limited ads, will be possible to change)– initial research 3 months after launch:
AM/FM Much Better
AM/FM Better
The Same
XM Better XM Clearly Better
Rating of XM Compared to Regular Radio
1% 6% 93%
XM Has Many More
XM Has More
About the Same
XM Has Fewer
XM Has Far Fewer
Commercials on XM and Regular Radio
2% 13% 85%
XM vs. SIRIUS
• Sirius launched in February of 2002
• 100% commercial free on all music channels
• Service price: $12.95 a month ($3 more than XM! More consistent with market research analysis…)
• XM secured GM, Sirius secured Ford and DaimlerChrysler
• Sirius puts emphasis on retailers – particularly Best Buy and Circuit City
XM vs. SIRIUSAt retail the sales rep had no easy way to communicate the
difference between XM and Sirius other than:-- “XM is cheaper on subscription but you have the ads while Sirius
is ad free and costs you 3 bucks more”-- didn’t always mention that advertising was limited, didn’t always
remember the nuanced details, no real incentive to differentiate-- both had 100 channels (and impossible for the salesperson to
articulate a specific difference) -- XM couldn’t afford the discussion to be framed that way
• In February of 2004 XM announces: “Commercial free on all music channels!”
• In April of 2005 XM announces that it is raising the price of its subscription to $12.95 a month – at that point, no difference in revenue model…
XM FinancialsRevenue Net Loss CPGA
2002 $20.2m $495.0m $425
2003 $91.8m $584.5m $137
2004 $244.4m $642.4m $100
2005 $503m $666.7m $109
2006 $933.4m $718.9m $108
2007 $1136.5m $682m $121
Revenue Net Loss CPGA
2002 $805k $313.1m
2003 $12.9m $437.5m $293
2004 $66.9m $456.2m $177
2005 $242.2m $567.5m $139
2006 $637.2m $1.1b $114
2007 $922.1m $565.3m $101
Sirius Financials
Advertising Revenue on Non-Music Channels
In 2006– XM $35.3m– Sirius $31m
In 2007– XM $39.2m
– Sirius $39.95m (corresponds to roughly 40cents per month per subscriber)
Satellite Radio Diffusion PatternDate Total XM SIRI
01 Q4 28 28 0
02 Q1 77 76 0
02 Q2 140 137 3
02 Q3 213 202 12
02 Q4 390 360 30
03 Q1 551 483 68
03 Q2 797 692 105
03 Q3 1079 930 150
03 Q4 1621 1360 261
04 Q1 2034 1682 352
04 Q2 2581 2100 480
04 Q3 3178 2516 662
04 Q4 4343 3200 1143
05 Q1 5219 3770 1449
05 Q2 6215 4400 1815
05 Q3 7209 5035 2174
05 Q4 9250 5933 3317
06 Q1 10580 6502 4078
06 Q2 11578 6900 4678
06 Q3 12305 7186 5119
06 Q4 13654 7629 6025
07 Q1 14481 7900 6581
07 Q2 15393 8250 7143
07 Q3 16237 8570 7667
07 Q4 17420 9100 8320
Cumulative Satellite Radio Subscribers (in '000s)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
01 Q
4
02 Q
2
02 Q
4
03 Q
2
03 Q
4
04 Q
2
04 Q
4
05 Q
2
05 Q
4
06 Q
2
06 Q
4
07 Q
2
07 Q
4
XM and Sirius Merger• Announced February 19th 2007; needs government + FCC approval
• When gave licenses in 1997 stipulated: “ One licensee will not be permitted to acquire control of the other remaining one”
• Merger approved in July, 2008. New name: Sirius XM Radio
• Regulators require: price freeze for three years; 24 channels turned over to noncommercial and minority programming; a la carte channel subscriptions and cross-offering of packages
• “Best of both” subscription for $16.99
• Working on a dual-receiver
Media Markets
• Media firms buy consumers’ attention by offering free content
• Low content prices attract more eyeballs, which can be sold to advertisers
• Too many commercials may annoy viewers
Broadcast TVConsumers Advertisers
Payment (free content) Payment
Attention Attention
XM RadioConsumers Advertisers
Payment (less then w/o advertising)
Payment
Attention AttentionSubsidy
Content
Two-Sided Markets
• Platform: the product or service that brings together two markets
• More demand on one side stimulates (sometimes hurts) demand on the other side
• XM Radio– Side 1: Subscribers– Side 2: Advertisers
• Typical scenario: One side is B2C, other is B2B
PlatformSide 1 Side 2
Examples
Market Side 1 Side 2 Providers
Web Search Searchers Advertisers Google, Yahoo
PC OS Consumers Application developers
Microsoft, Apple
Online recruitment Job seekers Employers Monster, CareerBuilder
HMOs Patients Doctors Kaiser, WellPoint
Video Games Players Developers PS, Xbox, Wii
Universal Product Code Product suppliers Retailers NCR, Symbol Tech.
Credit Cards Cardholders Merchants Visa, MasterCard
Travel Reservation Travelers Airlines Orbitz, Travelocity
Shopping malls Shoppers (Buyers) Retailers (Sellers) Next week
Key Challanges
• How to price? Which side to subsidize?
• Winner-takes-all dynamics
• Envelopment
Pricing
• Take into account cross-side network effects
• Subsidize one side
• Which one?– Price sensitivity– Quality sensitivity– Variable cost– Brand value
Pricing
Price Price
Dem
and
Dem
and
Side 1 Side 2
Winner-Takes-All Dynamics
• How many platforms can the market support?
• User switching costs
• Network effects
• No strong preference for special features
Envelopment
• Multiplatform bundles as threats (convergence)
• Sell or
• Change business model or
• Sue
Summary
• Two-sided markets are common in high-tech industries
• Usually one side is B2B, but
• Cannot be treated separately from B2C side