business law sample assignment

7/27/2019 business law sample assignment

1/5

Page 1of 5

PART A

Question One

i. Identification of the legal issue

The legal issue is the element of agreement required for the formation of a legallyenforceable contract.

Explanations of the relevant principles of law (with reference to cases/legislation)

The courts presume that when a condition is fulfilled, a legally binding agreement is

created. Whether or not it hinges on an event happening does not matter.

In the case of Masters v Cameron [1954] 91 CLR 353, Cameron agreed to sell her farm

off to Masters for an amount of 17,500. Both parties signed an agreement, in which a

stipulation stated that a formal contract would be drawn up later. With respects to the

issue of whether or not there was a contract created upon agreement between the two

parties, the court held that there had not been.

When it is an issue of electronic communication, the courts refer to legislation.

According to the Electronic Transitions Act 2000 Section 13 A sub-section 1 a, the time

of receipt of the electronic communication is the time when the electronic

communication becomes capable of being retrieved by the addressee at an electronic

address designated by the addressee. Section 2 then goes on to state that it is to be

assumed that the electronic communication is capable of being retrieved by the

addressee when it reaches the addressees electronic address. Taking these two factsinto mind, the courts will presume that any fault on behalf of the receiver which leads

him or her to not check their electronic communication in time does not affect any

contract being communicated electronically at the time.

The courts will presume that any communication via post in order to accept an offer

translates into acceptance as soon as the post of acceptance leaves the offeree.

In the case of Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27, Fraser offered to sell houses to

Henthorn for a sum of 750. Henthorn had 14 days to accept the offer, and posted a

letter to Fraser accepting it. Prior to Fraser receiving the letter, he decided to entertain ahigher purchase offer by another buyer. In the issue of whether Henthorn had accepted

the offer before Frasers attempt to withdraw it and entertain the other buyer, the courts

decided that acceptance of the offer occurred as soon as the acceptance letter from

Henthorn was sent via the post.


2/5

Page 2of 5

ii. Application of the law to the facts

As a contract is only formed when there is a clear agreement of the express terms and

condition, an objective assessment of the acceptance and the specific terms must be

made.

The question is whether, given the circumstances, a reasonable person would regard

the contract between Constructs Pty Ltd (hereafter referred to as Constructs) and the

Minister of Education (hereafter referred to as the Minister) as legally binding.

In the Ministers emailto Nicholas from Constructs, there was no future contract

formation stipulation or anything of the sort. In fact, the email itself was an offer that

could be accepted by Constructs straight away, which is what occurred.

The fact that the Minister was incapable of receiving the facsimile due to a lack of paper

does hold in her favour, if legislation is to be followed. However, the assumption that the

Minister was capable of receiving electronic communication when she was the partywho suggested it in the first place is a point against her case; Constructs could not have

known that the Minister would encounter such an obstacle.

Finally, Nicholas from Constructs ensured that he sent an acceptance letter by post as

well. The fact that the Minister did not receive this letter by post on time does not hold in

her favour. Nicholas had already conveyed his acceptance as soon as he posted the

letter.

iii. Possible Conclusions

In conclusion, it is likely that the courts will find there was indeed a legally enforceable

contract between Constructs Pty Ltd and the Minister of Education. The Minister will not

be able to hold in court that there was a contract as acceptance had occurred despite

her not knowing.

PART B

Question Two

i. Identification of the legal issue

The legal issue is the express contents of the contract, based on the correspondence

that has taken place between Nicholas Rogers of Constructs Pty Ltd (hereafter referred

to as Constructs) and the Minister for Education (hereafter referred to as the Minister)

thus far.


3/5

Page 3of 5

ii. Explanations of the relevant principles of law (with reference to

cases/legislation)

Before a contract can come into existence, terms must be negotiated, some of which

are those without which a party / the parties would not have agreed to enter into an

agreement, and others which are of lesser importance (Lambiris 2011). In this case,both the former (conditions) and the latter (warranties) must be discussed.

The court presumes that for there to be an element of agreement between two parties,

the essential terms (conditions) of the contract must be agreed upon (Lambiris 2011).

In the case ofAssociated Newspapers Ltd v Bancks[1951] 83 CLR 322, cartoonist

Bancks agreed to have his drawings published on the front page of the newspapers

comic section in exchange for a salary. Bancks drawings, however, appeared on the

third page instead, due to production problems. When addressing the issue of whether

or not publishing on the front page was an essential term i.e. a condition, the courtfound that it was indeed, and hence Bancks was justified in terminating his

performance.

Moreover, the court presumes that the breach of a warranty (a non-essential term) does

not entitle termination of performance by the breaching party.

In Bettini v Gye [1876] 1 QBD 183, singer Bettini was contracted to promoter Gye for

various events running between 15 weeks. One of the terms of the contract was that

Bettini arrive six days before the first performance to rehearse, a term she failed to live

up to due to being ill and missing four days. When addressing the issue of whether the

term requiring attendance for rehearsals was a warranty or a condition, the court foundthat it was a warranty, a breach of which would not cause the contract to be terminated.

The court further presumes that, if a party makes a statement to the other party to

encourage entering into an agreement, then the circumstances in which the statement

is made must be considered prior to establishing whether or not the statement is an

actual condition or merely a representation (which, if proved untrue, does not affect the

contract) (Lambiris 2011).

In Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957] 1 ALL ER 325, Williams mother owned a second

hand car which Williams took to a used car dealer to trade in. Although documentsgiven to Williams by his mother outlined the car to be a 1948 model, it turned out to be a

1939 model instead. Regarding the issue of whether or not the statement in the cars

documents was a term of the contract, the court found that the age of the car was in fact

mere representation rather than a contractually binding promise.|


4/5

Page 4of 5

iii. Application of the law to the facts

As an agreement is only valid if there is acceptance of the conditions of the contract by

the two parties involved, an objective assessment of the terms offered and what was

accepted must take place.

The question is what kind of terms in the assumed agreement between Constructs and

the Minister can be identified by a reasonable person to be conditions.

In her email to Nicholas Rogers, the Minister Hon. Joanne Lim MLA expressly states the

cash amount she is ready to offer in exchange for the construction work for a new high

school in Perth amounts to $20 million. It is further stated that work must commence

this monthand end no later than, 2 January 2014.The amount offered can be

considered to be a condition as it is an expressly stated consideration in exchange for

the construction work by Nicholas company. Moreover, the term involving the dates

between which work must occur are also deemed conditions, as they come withexplanations as to why this term is essential to the offerer; [the] department of

Education teaching staff will commence work on 3 January 2014.

The statement given by the Minister of Education also contains a request regarding the

use of local materials to produce as being in the interest of the state. This can be

considered to be a warranty as it is made clear this is an optional undertaking for

Constructs. There is no requirement for this term to be fulfilled, and failure to do so will

not terminate the contract between Constructs and the Minister.

The term of accepting the offer via a reply on facsimile or in the post is what the Minister

concludes her email by discussing. These terms can be considered to be conditionsbecause it is here that the offerer is granting the offeree the chance to accept. Upon

Nicholas acceptance, a legally enforceable contract comes into practice.

iv. Possible Conclusions

There is indeed an enforceable legally binding contract between Nicholas Rogers and

Hon. Joanne Lim MLA, with conditions already offered and accepted and an executed

condition paving the way for a contract.

.


5/5

Page 5of 5

Reference List

Associated Newspapers Ltd v Bancks [1951] 83 CLR 322

Bettini v Gye [1876] 1 QBD 183

Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (Cth)

Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27

Lambiris, Michael. 2011. First Principles of Business Law: Interactive

Tutorials and Source Book. Sydney: CCH Australia

Masters v Cameron [1954] 91 CLR 353

Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957] 1 ALL ER 325

Documents

business law sample assignment