Business and Enterprise Systems › Resources › Documents › … · I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 5 Foundations of the SEP DOD, AF, MAJCOM and other HHQ

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Business and Enterprise Systems

The New World of SEP,

BCL, and SDDP

Mr. David Sampson

Chief, Architecture and Process Branch

ESC/HIJG

23 May 12


What is the Systems Engineering Process (SEP)?

IT Acquisition Reform Initiatives

Business Capability Lifecycle (BCL) & the SEP

Service Development and Delivery Process (SDDP) & the SEP

Way Ahead / Current Initiatives

Rebuilding the SEP; Integration of BCL and SDDP

Process Management Board (PMB)

Model RFP/Standard Contract Language

SEP Hosting

2

Overview

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 3

What is the Systems Engineering

Process (SEP)?

Role-based technical and managerial frameworks for applying

methods, tools, and people to the acquisition, development, and

sustainment of information technology programs

Step-by-step procedural guidance at the global, phase, and work

product levels; includes comprehensive entry and exit criteria

Built-in systems engineering to reduce risk and avoid potential

programmatic shortfalls

Tailorable to accommodate the unique characteristics of individual

programs; PM and Engineering agreement

300+ Artifacts

A resource that provides guides, forms,

templates, procedures, reference materials,

and checklists to assist program teams

in every step of acquisition lifecycle management

TOTAL

LIFE CYCLE

SYSTEMS

MANAGEMENT


SEP Global Disciplines

– Configuration Management

– Decision Analysis and Resolution

– Measurement and Analysis

– Organizational Process Definition

– Process/Product Quality Assurance

– Project Monitoring and Control

– Requirements Development

– Requirements Management

– Risk Management

– Supplier Agreement Management

– Test and Evaluation

– Training

– Verification and Validation

Po

licy

Pro

ce

ss

Art

ifa

cts

Su

pp

ort

Systems Engineering Process

PEO

Capability Delivery


Foundations of the SEP

DOD, AF, MAJCOM and other HHQ publications

DODI 5000.02

AFI 63-1201 and Supplements, 63-101 and Supplements

Defense Acquisition Guidebook

Process area AFIs and T.O.s (PM, T&E, ORM, Requirements, etc.)

OSD and AF Directive Memorandums

Business Capabilities Lifecycle (BCL) Interim Guidance Memo

Public Law (e.g., NDAA, Clinger Cohen Act)

IEEE and Military Standards

SEI’s Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)®

Best Commercial Practices

Lessons Learned


AFPEO BES Policy

SEP mandated by AFPEO BES Memorandum – 13 Jan 2012

Applies to all Directorate programs, projects, and sustainment

activities regardless of ACAT or lifecycle phase

Directs development of Tailoring Worksheets

BES OI 63-3, Mission Capability Lifecycle Management will

replace the memorandum

Formalizes SEP mandate under formal OI

Establishes the Process Management Board (PMB)

Initial coordination complete; final coordination in progress

Estimated Publication Date: 15 Jun 2012


Benefits of Employing the SEP

Provides program teams a structured process that supports

delivery of mission-ready and sustainable products

Assists in satisfying customer and user requirements

Delivers repeatable processes

Provides the structure and rigor to satisfy AF SEAM requirements

Guides teams through DoD, AF, AFMC, Center and statutory

directives, instructions and life cycle policies; centralized

location for the most current policy and guidance

Ensures verification and validation of product(s); higher quality

program documentation/artifacts = better deliverables

Reduces program risks


Current SEP Frameworks


Master Process Flow

9


SEP Process Workflows

Materiel Solution Analysis Phase

Overview

Life Cycle

Overview

View

Entire PhaseClose Diagram

View Legend

Start Materiel Solution

Analysis Phase

1.0

Phase Initiation & Project

Management Activities

3.0

System Engineering

Activities

5.0

Preferred System

Concept Activities

2.0

Project Estimation

Activities

9.0

Acquisition

Activities

8.0

Compliance

Activities

12.0

Pre-Technology

Development Phase

Activities

11.0

Formal Reviews

Start Technology

Development Phase

4.0

Compliance

Activities

6.0

Project Estimation

Activities

7.0

Pre-Acquisition

Activities

10.0

Capabilities

Documentation

MS

A

MDD

Return to

Previous PageICD

1.0

Phase Initiation

and Project

Management

Activities

2.0

Project

Estimation

Activities

4.0

Compliance

Activities

7.0

Pre-

Acquisition

Activities

11.0

Formal

Reviews

6.0

Project

Estimation

Activities

5.1

Conduct

Initial Technical

Review (ITR)

ITR Procedure

ITR Checklist

5.10

Develop Systems

Engineering (SE)

Plan

5.11

Evaluate Product

Support

Capabilities

5.13

Develop

Technology

Development

Strategy (TDS)

Refine Initial

Concept Procedure

5.12

Start SISSU

Questions in

EITDR

SE Plan Guide

SE Plan for 5000

Framework Template

5.5

Complete

Economic

Analysis

MAIS Only

5.3

Complete

Analysis of

Alternatives

(AoA)

5.7Establish Integrated

Test Team (ITT) &

Develop Charter

5.9

Develop Test &

Evaluation (T&E)

Strategy

ITT GuideT&E Strategy Template

5.8

Recommend

Responsible Test

Organization

(RTO)

Effective Meetings

Procedure

Defense Acquisition

Guidebook

5.6

Coordinate Test

Activities with

AFOTEC

Air Force

Operational Test and

Evaluation Center

(AFOTEC)T&E Guide ITT Charter Template

Security, Inoperability,

Supportability,

Sustainability, & Usability

5.4

Conduct

Alternative

Systems Review

(ASR)

ASR Procedure

ASR Checklist

AoA Study Plan

Template

SEP Tailoring Guide

DoD Directive 8320.02

DoD Instruction 5200.39

DoD Manual 5000.04-M-1

5.2 Refine

Initial Concept



DTM 11-009

Acquisition Policy for DBS

12

Establishes policy requiring the use of the

Business Capability Lifecycle (BCL) model as

the acquisition process for Defense Business

Systems (DBS)

BCL is the overarching framework for the

planning, design, acquisition, deployment,

operations, maintenance, and

modernization of DBS, in accordance with

section 2222(f) of title 10, United States

Code (U.S.C.).

BCL facilitates DBS acquisition by

providing a process tailored to the unique

requirements of business systems.

Establishes roles and responsibilities for

Defense Business System Management

Committee (DBSMC), Certification

Authority (CA), Investment Review Board

(IRB), Milestone Decision Authority (MDA),

Component Acquisition Executive (CAE),

and functional sponsors


Applicability to PEO BES

Portfolio

BCL shall apply to each DBS modernization with a total cost over $1,000,000 across the current FYDP Modernization Defined (Section 2222, title 10 USC):

(A) the acquisition or development of a new defense business system; or

(B) any significant modification or enhancement of an existing defense business system (other than necessary to maintain current services).

Implementation is effective immediately; DTM will be included in an upcoming change to DoDI 5000.02

The BCL acquisition business model and this DTM take precedence over applicable sections DoDI 5000.02. Where applicable to DBS, certain sections of DoDI 5000.02 are referenced within this DTM and shall continue to apply


Roles and Responsibilities

DTM sets specific roles and responsibilities (not all inclusive):

Certification Authority (CA; usually the IRB chair)

Employs IRBs; certifies investments

Defense Business Systems Management Committee (DBSMC)

Approves CA certification of funds for DBS modernization efforts

Investment Review Board (IRB)

Reviews problem statements and business cases; advises the MDA (MAIS DBS)

Investment Review Board (IRB) Chair

Approves problem statements; provides MDA with MS acquisition

recommendation (MAIS DBS)

Functional Sponsor

Identifies funding for all phases throughout the DBS lifecycle

Ensures Business Process Reengineering (BPR) has been performed

Develops Problem Statement

Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)

Responsible for DBS acquisition decisions

Tailor regulatory and acquisition processes to achieve cost, schedule performance

goals


Intent – Incremental

Approach

Business needs will be divided into useful, supportable, distinct, fully-

funded, manageable increments that can be developed, tested,

produced, deployed and sustained

Multiple increments may be approved concurrently; each require:

Well defined and approved requirements with full funding

Appropriate entry and exit criteria

MDA’s Authority To Proceed (ATP) documented in an ADM

Rapid and responsive deployment – the “Big Bang” is gone

No more than 12 months between MDD and MS A

No more than 12 months between initial contract award and MS B

No more than 18 months between contract award and Full Deployment Decision (FDD)

For Non-MAIS DBS, IOC must be achieved within 5 years from MS A

For MAIS DBS, a Full Deployment Decision (FDD) no later than 5 years from when the

MDA selected the alternative and documented it (usually the Funds First Obligated (FFO)

date)

Exceptions reviewed by MDA and IRB


BCL Acquisition Model


Framework Alignments

17

A B C


Business Capability

Definition Phase

Purpose: To analyze a perceived business need and document the results in a Problem Statement to inform

future decision making.

Begins: Identification of a business need by anyone.

Activities (shall be used in lieu of JCIDS): Analysis conducted by Functional Sponsor and results in a

summarized Problem Statement; IRB and possibly JROC review of problem statement; AoA Study Guidance

prepared by DCAPE for MAIS (or Component for non-MAIS); AoA Study Plan prepared by Functional

Sponsor based on approved AoA Study Guidance.

Ends: IRB Chair approves Problem Statement.


Investment Management

Phase

Purpose: Assess material solutions and satisfy phase-specific entrance criteria designated by the MDA for

the next milestone.

Enter: Approved Problem Statement, approved AOA Study Guidance and AoA Study Plan for conducting

AoA.

Activities: Analysis describing requirements for a material solution; solution summary; program justification;

acquisition and contracting approach; Business Case and Program Charter development; ERAM (MAIS

DBS) and risk mitigation plan; DBSMC certification; CAE compliance memo for MAIS DBS.

Exit: Phase specific requirements are satisfied; IRB reviews the Business Case; IRB Chair forwards a MS A

recommendation to the MDA.


Prototyping Phase

Purpose: To demonstrate the capability of the software in a relevant environment to meet business process

requirements outlined in the Business Case. Provides knowledge to refine user requirements and inform RFP

and APB development.

Enter: AoA Results and proposed materiel solution; CAE approved Program Charter; full funding for

Prototyping activities; compliance with MS A statutory and regulatory requirements for DBS.

Activities: Review and approval of business case by MDA at MS A; demonstration of IT in a relevant

environment; software usability, scalability, accessibility and utility; peak performance definition and

prediction; design approach evaluation; system level PDR (prior to MSB for modernizations over $1M); CSP

goals documented in draft APB; identify IOC requirements; conduct ERAM for MAIS DBS; PM forwards MS B

acquisition decision package to IRB.

Exit: Phase specific requirements are satisfied and the IRB Chair forwards a MS B recommendation to the

MDA.


Engineering Development

Phase

Purpose: Demonstration that the materiel solution for the increment has been designed, configured,

developed and tested in consistent with the approved Business Case and Program Charter and supports

limited fielding and testing in an operational environment.

Enter: Completion of prototyping phase objectives, if conducted; full funding of program or increment;

submission of draft APB; updated business case and charter; compliance with MS B statutory and

regulatory requirements.

Activities: Review and approval of updated business case by MDA at MS B; refine system requirements;

configure software; build functionality as required; conduct AOTR for DOT&E oversight programs; conduct

DT and plan OT; PM forwards MS C acquisition decision package to IRB.

Exit: Phase specific requirements are satisfied; Functional sponsors review test reports and determine that

the outcomes and metrics as stated in the approved business case objectives have been satisfied.


Limited Fielding Phase

Purpose: Limit risk by fielding the capability to a limited number of users and testing in an operational

environment; Determination of operational effectiveness and suitability by OT&E.

Enter: Completion of the Engineering Development (ED) phase objectives; Functional Sponsor’s

determination that capabilities achieves the outcomes specified in the Business Case; and, the program is in

compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements for MS C in accordance with attachment 3 of the DTM.

Activities: Review and approval of the updated business case by MDA at MS C; MDA and functional

sponsor approval to field capability in an operational environment; verification by operational testers that

functional requirements are satisfied; determination of effectiveness and suitability; written declaration that

system has achieved IOC.

Exit: Phase specific requirements are satisfied; completed IOT&E, IOC declared.


Full Deployment Phase

Purpose: To field an increment of capability for operational use to all users.

Enter: Completion IOT&E; Declaration of IOC; Satisfaction of DOTMLPF solution outlined in Business

Case.

Activities: Review of business case, IOT&E results and DOT&E recommendation by MDA at FDD to

make determination to proceed to full deployment; close out review with IRB upon completion of phase.


Operations and Support

Phase

Purpose: Execution of support program over lifecycle.

Enter: Satisfaction of MDA imposed conditions at FDD; Functional Sponsor’s written declaration of FD, as

defined in the business case.

Activities: Lifecycle support for availability, maintainability, sustainability, scalability, reliability, and

affordability; reviews of sustainment strategies and identification of deficiencies documented in an updated

business case; System disposal at end of life

End: System Disposal


DoDI 5000.02 Changes

Full rewrite of DoDI 5000.02 is underway

Major restructuring; guidance divided into different parts/sections

Part 1 will include specific sections for Weapons Systems, IT/IS, Defense

Business Systems (BCL)*, etc.

Part 2 will include supporting processes that supplement Part 1

(USD) AT&L currently reviewing draft; further coordination

pending

* DTM 11-009 will be incorporated into the new version of the DoDI

25


What is SDDP?

26

“The SDDP is an effort by the United States Air Force (USAF) to improve the definition,

design, acquisition, implementation and delivery of warfighter capabilities. The SDDP is

end user-centric to better align the assistance required by an end user to address a

process-based problem. The SDDP comprises six individual Steps that can be tailored

to accommodate both large and small scale problems. Each Step in the SDDP has

specific product outcomes that serve as the basis for downstream activities in the SDDP

and facilitate enterprise-level analysis to maximize reuse of existing capabilities.”

-- SDDP AFMAN Execsum v1 1-04-12 Final Draft, p. 3

What the SDDP Is… What the SDDP Is Not…

• It’s all about outcomes!

• It’s a flexible framework for achieving

the end goal.

• It’s not a prescriptive set of procedures.

• It’s not a set of boxes to check or

templates to fill out.


SDDP FAQs

27

Question Answer

1. What is SDDP?

2. What is it used for?

The SDDP is a path with guidance designed to walk a user from

understanding and defining a need, through determining the best solution(s),

to implementing the solution(s).

3. Generally, how is it

used?

The SDDP is a path for the end-user (warfighter) that brings diverse skill sets,

resources, and organizations to solve the end-user’s needs, without placing

the burden on the end-user to be skilled in or to perform all the activities

necessary to satisfy the need.

4. What are the desired

results?

Process-derived solutions across the entire Doctrine, Organization, Training,

Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities (DOTMLPF) spectrum resulting in

more effective and efficient mission operations.

5. What’s different

versus what was

done in the past?

SDDP is the Air Force’s methodology to implement a Solution for a need or

problem. Past practice utilized the consulting industry to gather solution

proposals based on a “Statement of Objectives” based acquisition pattern,

which, in retrospect, fails to provide efficient/effective Defense IT.

6. What training and

skills are relevant to

SDDP?

Many training courses and experiences are applicable to the SDDP (Business

analysis, performance measurement, process re-engineering), however the

SDDP is based on outcomes.


SDDP Step 1

28

PURPOSE

To define the user’s problem in sufficient detail such that a plan for

implementing capabilities to solve the user’s problem can be developed and

implemented.

OUTCOMES

■ Clear, concise statement of the user’s problem and/or needs.

■ Documentation of relevant Legislation, Regulation and Policy (LRP).

■ Delineation of a proposed set of capabilities that will solve the user’s

problem or meet the user’s needs.

■ Generation of a set of performance measures that will indicate whether

the capabilities, once implemented, actually solve the user’s problem or

meet the user’s need.

Identify

DOTMLPF

Capability

Requirements

Define

DOTMLPF

Executable

Actions

Define Materiel

Solution and

Implementation

Plan

Plan / implement

developmental

components of

the Materiel

Solution

Sustain

Application

Lifecycle

Deploy/Operate

the Materiel

Solution

Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 1 Step 6

Fu

nctio

nal/ S

ME

Sponsor

Architecture T

eam

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

"Sandbox"

.

Determine, prioritize, and present DOTMLPF capability requirements to Sponsor

Conduct Enterprise Architecture analysis

Obtain formal Review and approval to proceed

"Sandbox"

Identify relevant legal, regulatory, and policy constraints

Define statement of need/problem statement

Identified

Top Level

Need

Start

SDDP 1.0 Draft Initial

Statement of

Need/Problem

Statement

Review and

Approve statement

of need/problem

statement and work

plan with Sponsor.

Scope the downstream

efforts to complete steps

1 and 2 (define scope,

charter, schedule of

milestones and

deliverables, resource

requirements)

Gather known LRP

requirements

Identify Public Laws,

DOD Directives,

Manuals& Instructions,

and OMB, GAO, BTA

Findings

Determine

Sub-Capability

requirements based on

constraints (with user)

Prioritization of

Sub-Capability based on

SME/Functional defined

criteria

Verify Requirements

Satisfy

all relevant LRP

Constraints

Conduct Enterprise

Architecture analysis

Ensure alignment with AF

Strategy

Determine potential

duplication/conflict with

other enterprise

requirements

Sponsor

Approval?

Receive Needs Data

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Open)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (WIP)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Query 'As is'

Repository for

related LRP.

Complete LRP section of

PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Complete

Sub-Capability

Requirements section

of PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(WIP)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Approved Prioritized

Sub-Capabilities

Requirements?

Complete performance

measures and Key

Performance Attributes

section of PRM

Template

Identify existing

Key Performance

Attributes to satisfy

the Sub-Capability,

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Document :

Statement

of Need /

Problem

Statement

Begin 1.1 End 1.1 Begin 1.2

List: Laws,

Regulations,

Policies

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

NoEnterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Identify Public Laws, DOD

Directives, Manuals&

Instructions, and OMB,

GAO, BTA Findings


PRM Template

No

Yes

End 1.2

Analyze for relevance

(Down-select pertinent

LRP.)

Begin 1.3

Decompose

Need/Problem

Statement into

Sub-Capabilities

Needs

PRM

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 1.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 2.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree N.

Query Architecture

to look for similar

Sub-Capabilities

End 1.3 Begin 1.4

For the sub-capability,

identify the Key


Report:

Identified

attributes to

satisfy the

capability

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Determine

Sub-Capability

requirements

based on constraints

Complete

Sub-Capability

Requirement section

of PRM Template

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes


measures and thresholds for

each Key Performance

Attributes of PRM Template

End 1.4

Begin 1.5

Engage the

Enterprise

Architecture Team

End 1.5

Begin 1.6

Submit

Capabilities

Requirements for

approval

Determine Initial

Scope with general

cost estimate

Identify Key Performance Attributes

End 1.6

Review

Capability

Requirements

Corporate

Approval?

Yes

Report:

Performance

Requirements

for the

Capability

No

Yes

All Stop

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Document: Laws,

Regulations and

Policy constrains/

mandates with

findings for

relevance

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Report:

Sub-Capabilities

for the Need

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

All Stop

Capability Requirements Completion Criteria:

1. Prioritized by Sponsor

2. Satisfies all relevant LRP constraints

3. Does not duplicate other required capabilities

4. Reviewed and approved by AF Corporate Structure, as appropriate

5. Meets EA standards for representation

6. Registered in PRM

7. Performance Measures defined

No

All Stop

Go to Step 2

Approved

Revise

DeniedApproved

Revise

Denied Approved

Denied

Proceed Previous

Sponsor Decision Point

Revise

Proceed to


No

No

Fu

nctio

nal/

SM

ES

ponsor

Process T

eam

Architectu

re T

eam

Approval Success Criteria

A. Institutionalization of business processes through AFI/policy documentation (includes LRP)

B. Prioritization of information assets by SRA

D. Validation of adherence to EA standards by CIO

F. Obtain approval to execute requirements to put the process into practice from appropriate authority (depending on scope)

G. Capture auditable process models into Business Reference Model

H. Contextual description of information assets clearly delineated from information flows within auditable business processes

Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Process Team

"Sandbox"

Conduct Process Engineering

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Start

SDDP 2.0

Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis

Identify Reuse Capability

Ensure other processes that

may be affected by

modification of these

processes have been

identified and impacts

addressed

Define Start Points, Ends

and Outcomes Define Process Steps

Ensure processes

adequately define context

for information assets

Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis

Capture DOTMLPF

interdependencies

(temporal, decisional,

informational) to other

processes

Inform/Adjudicate other

processes that may be

affected by modification

of these processes

(understand impacts)

Validate BPR/process

improvement effects at an

enterprise level

Develop

Implementation Plans Obtain

formal review

and approval to

proceed

Validation of appropriate

BPR

Package BPR

Assertion Documentation

Register content

in Business

Reference Model

Process

Engineering

Content

Approved?

Yes

BRM

-Mission Process Map (Close)

-Auditable Process (WIP)

- Business Rules (Close)

-Dependencies (Open)

Information Assets (Close)

-Information Flows (Close)

-BPR Assertion Documentation

(Open)

BRM


-Auditable Process (Close)


-Dependencies (Close)



-BPR Assertion

Documentation (Open)

Define required skill sets

and proficiencies for each

process step

Sequence Process Steps to

create Discrete Process

Steps including information

dimension supporting process

steps

Characterize Information Flows

( input, manipulation of

information, output)

BPR

Assertion

Complete?

Yes

Revise

Characterize Information Assets

needed for Information Flows

Define ROI and

investment auditability

Build work plans

Generate BCA

Ensure All expected

outcomes from 1.0 are

address/satisfied

Define Mission

Processes to Deliver

DOTMLPF Capability

Requirements

High Level

Process

describing

expected

outcomes

Work plan

approved?

Revisit work plan for

additional resources

required

Approved

Revise

Provide basic process

information to Process

Team (I.E "Yellow

Sticky's", "Napkins" etc)

Process Engineering Completion Criteria:

A. Define process steps inputs and outputs. (Note: Put/Gets of Information Assets are process steps)

B. Define business rules for each process step, including manipulations to information needed for process step, creation of record/store, workflow

C. Define decisions taken in the step

D. Define outputs from process steps, including information outputs to store or to next process step

No

Characterize the

DOTMLPF execution

requirements to put the

process into practice

and be successful

Execution

Requirements

Approved?

Approved

Begin End

Process

Engineering

DOTMLPF

Implementation

Plan

-Characterized execution

requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

BRM







-BPR Assertion Documentation (Close)

Process

Information

from SME

Proceed to Define Mission Processes

to Deliver DOTMLPF

Capability Requirements

All Stop

Denied

Proceed to Process

Engineering Activities

No

Proceed to Step 3

All Stop

Denied

All Stop

Denied

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

YesCorporate

Approval?

Yes

Approved

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

No

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Obtain SME Support for

Process Engineering

Activities

BRM








(Open)

Work Plan

SDDP 1 & 2

- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones

(from Step 1)

Revise

Functional/S

ME

Spon

sor

Syste

m E

ngin

eering

/ D

esig

n

Arc

hitectu

re T

eam

CO

I/E

VT

Govern

ance

Pro

ject Lead / P

roduct

Cente

rP

latform

En

gin

eering

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor

System Engineering / Design

COI / EVT

Governance

Project Lead / Product Center

Platform Engineering


Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance


Governance

Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



BCL Compliance Governance

"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Prepare Bounded User Requirements for Implementation

"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Onboarding

Information Analysis

Build Material Solution Implementation Plan

Information Exchange RequirementsDesign Contextual Model

Package bounded user

requirements for Product

Center

Go to SDDP Step 4

BRM from

Step 2

Begin Finish

Lift information

puts/gets for each

process model

Capture the business

rules, authorization and

access rules, service

requirements for each

put/get within the

process

Define the information

flow necessary to

satisfy each put/get

from the process

For each information flow

describe the business

rules and service levels

requirements necessary

to meet the process

Evaluate ability of source to

satisfy part or all of

Contextual Model both from

a function and a feasibility of

implementation

Develop COAs that align the

best uses of the various

sources (combination of

sources may be the most

efficient path) to satisfy the

Contextual Model

Approve

Review Package

and Select

COA?

Investigate potential

solutions (COTS/GOTS/

Web Service Code /

Systems) to satisfy all or

part of the Contextual

Model

All Stop

Revise

Denied

Begin 3.0

Start

Material

Solution

Design

Review

and Approve,

Contextual Model

and Work

Plan

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Sponsor Review Package

-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)

-COA Components (Close)

-COA Sequence (Close)

-COA Evaluation Criteria (Close)

-COA Compliance Requirements (Close)

-Onboarding Compliance Rqts (Close)

-BEA Compliance Rqts (Close)

-LRP Compliance Rqts (Close)

-COA DOTLPF Impact Analysis (Close)

- Reusability (Close)

- Dependencies (Close)

- Constraints (Close)

-COA Change Management Plan (Close)

-COA Cost Estimates (Close)

Return to Material Solution Design

Revise

Contextual Model

-Information Puts/Gets (WIP)

-Business Rules (WIP)

-Authorization and Access (WIP)

-End User Design Guidelines (WIP)

Architecture

Support?

No

Assess capability coverage

of solution options

Yes

Discover existing potential

solutions (COTS/GOTS /

Web Service Code /



Model

Auditable

Process

model 1

Auditable

Process

model 2

Auditable

Process

model N

Contextual

model for

Process 1

Contextual

model for

Process 2

Contextual

model for

Process N

Work Plan to build the

M-Implementation Plan

- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones

Scope Work Plan to build

the M-Implementation

Define impacts for each

COA to DOTLPF

necessary to support the

material solution

Additional

Process

Flows?

Yes

SME

Validation of

Contextual

Model?

Architecture

Support?

No

Yes

For each COA, Identify the reuse

opportunities across the

enterprise to support the DOTLPF

change management requirements

Approve

Bounded User

Requirements?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

All Stop

Approved?

SWG review of

Governance

Package

IRB review of

Governance

Package

Greater than

$1M

Approved Yes

Denied

Validate

Contextual Model

content

Provide LRP compliance

requirements checklist for

each COA

DBSMC review of

Governance

Package

No

No

Get SME validation on

contextual model

Yes

Update DOTMLPF

Implementation plan

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Bounded User

Requirements

- M Implementation Plan

-SRM

-DRM

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Assemble

Governance

package

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Approved?

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

All Stop

Denied

Onboarding Requirements (close)

-Mission Critical Requirements (Close)

-Topology Requirements (Close)

-Additional Infrastructure Requirements (Close)

-Distributing Components Requirements (Open)

-Service Monitoring Requirements (Open)

-SLAs (Open)

-Onboarding Compliance Requirements (Close)

CMO review of

Governance

Package

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Derive additional

infrastructure

service necessary

to support COA

Update

Implementation

Plan

Approved

Derive mission

critical -Onboarding

requirements

Conduct

infrastructure

topology analysis

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (WIP)

-COA Components (Open)

-COA Sequence (Open)


-COA Compliance Requirements (Open)

-Onboarding Compliance Rqts (Open)

-BEA Compliance Rqts (Open)

-LRP Compliance Rqts (Open)

-COA DOTLPF Impact Analysis (Open)

- Reusability (Open)

- Dependencies (Open)

- Constraints (Open)

-COA Change Management Plan (Open)

-COA Cost Estimates (Open)


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Conduct Cost

Estimates for each

COA

SRM

-Contextual Model (Close)

-Web Service Code Requirements (Open)

-Information Exchange Requirements (Open)

-Functional Requirements( Open)

-Service Levels (Open)

-Detailed Design Requirements (Open)

-Automated Information Assets (Open)

-Reuse components (Open)

-COTS/GOTS Requirements (Open)


-Functional Requirements (Open)




-System Requirements (Open)






-Compliance Requirements (Open)

-On Boarding Requirements (Open)

Create Draft

M- Implementation Plan


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)








-COA DOTLPF Impact Analysis (WIP)






SRM





















-Compliance Requirements (WIP)

-On Boarding Requirements (WIP)

SRM








-Reuse components (WIP)














-On Boarding Requirements (Close)

Identify information

exchanges / assets

Define Initial Functional

Requirements to implement

information exchanges

COI Coordination Panel will

make a recommendation to the

Sponsor to either re-charter an

existing COI or establish a new

COI to meet information sharing

requirement.

Charter Approved

by SWG?

Approve COI

vocabulary

package

Identify

authoritative

and source data

from a process

perspective

Identify ADS

Determine access

rules ,roles and

permissions for assets

and planned services

Stand Up

COI

Develop Draft

Ontology

Stand Down

COI

Proceed to

Begin Vocabulary Work

No

SWG Approval

COI Vocabulary

package

Yes

Generate

Vocabulary

Package

Proceed to


No

SRM


-Web Service Code Requirements (WIP)

-Information Exchange Requirements (Close)

-Functional Requirements( Close)

-Service Levels (Close)




-COTS/GOTS Requirements (WIP)






-System Requirements (WIP)






-Compliance Requirements (Close)


SRM







-Automated Information Assets (Close)

-Reuse components (Close)

-COTS/GOTS Requirements (Close)






-System Requirements (Close)








DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)

-List of information assets (Close)

Vocabulary Package (WIP)

-Authoritative data Source (ADS) Mapping (Close)

-Roles and permissions (Close)

-Example Data Record (Close)

-Ontology (Open)

-Reusable COI Artifacts (WIP)

DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)



-Authoritative data Source (ADS) Mapping

(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


DRM

-COI Charter (Close)




(WIP)

-Roles and permissions (WIP)

-Example Data Record (WIP)

-Ontology (WIP)


Yes

NoCapture how the user

wants to use each

put/get (ex.

Presentation, Usability)

LRP Compliance

Requirements Checklist

-Clinger & Cohen. (Open)

-PIA (Open)

-FISMA (Open)

-NDAA (Open)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering

*Section 508 Compliance

*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP

*Investment included in

AF Budget

-DIACAP (Open)

For each COA, identify the

inherited attributes that

sufficiently satisfy the

compliance requirements

checklist

Identify evidence

that can satisfy

compliance

requirements

LRP Compliance


-Clinger & Cohen. (Close)

-PIA (Close)

-FISMA (Close)

-NDAA (Close)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Close)

Build evaluation criteria

for COAs to satisfy the

Contextual Model

Provide to Sponsor

recommended

evaluation criteria for

COAs to satisfy the

Contextual Model


-Work Break Structure/ RTM (WIP)

-Service Implementation Schedule (WIP)

-Cost Estimate (WIP)

-DOTLPF Change Management Plan (WIP)

-Governance Package (WIP)

-IT Dashboards (Close)

-BPR Assertion (Close)

-Funding Profile (Close)

-CMO Determination Memo - If Greater than $1M (Open)

-Approval Signatures (Open)

-Compliance Completion Plan (Close)

-Onboarding Plan (WIP) (from SRM)

-Resourcing (WIP)


-Work Break Structure/ RTM (Close)

-Service Implementation Schedule (Close)

-Cost Estimate (Close)

-DOTLPF Change Management Plan (Close)

-Governance Package (Close)




-CMO Determination Memo - If Greater

than $1M (Close)

-Approval Signatures (Close)


-Onboarding Plan (Close)

-Resourcing (Close)

Based on the COA

selected, commence the

information analysis


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














For each COA determine the

scope, scalability and degree of

difficultly of its associated

DOTLPF change management

requirements

DRM



Vocabulary Package (Close)

-Authoritative data Source (ADS)

Mapping (Close)



-Ontology (Close)

-Reusable COI Artifacts (Close)

Identify reuse opportunities for

Web Services, Point to Point

Interfaces, Data Services, and

Exposure Services

Initiate COI

Coordination

Submit COI Charter to

SWG

Proceed to Previous Sponsor Checkpoint

No

Request SME support for

COA evaluation criteria

development

Draft a new COI

charter or revise

existing COI Charter

Approved and

COA Selected

For the selected COA identify any

information exchange reuse

opportunities within the enterprise

that will support the implementation

of the contextual model

DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)

-List of information assets

(Open)


-Authoritative Data Source

(ADS) Mapping (WIP)

-Roles and permissions

(WIP)

-Example Data Record

(WIP)

-Ontology (WIP)


Sponsor

Champions

ADS

Yes

Identify additional

information

exchanges requiring

new implementation

COI Coordination Panel

reviews charter and provides

a recommendation to the

Sponsor

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

Yes

Corporate

Approval?

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

Yes

No

SRM























SRM























Identify Project Lead










-CMO Determination Memo - If Greater than $1M (Close)



-Onboarding Plan (WIP)

-Resourcing (WIP)

Determine

Distributing

Computing

requirements

Develop service

monitoring requirements

Develop Service

Levels

Agreements

(SLA's) for each

layer of service

Review Legacy

System

Requirements

Onboarding Requirements (Close)




-Distributing Components Requirements (Close)

-Service Monitoring Requirements (Close)

-SLAs (Close)


Provide Sponsor

Cost Estimate

Updates


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (Close)

-COAs (Close)














Update cost

estimates to M-

Implementation

Plan

BRM (From Step 2)



-Business Rules (Close)





(Close)

BRM (From Step 2)

-Mission Process Map

(Close)

-Auditable Process

(Close)



Information Assets

(Close)


-BPR Assertion

Documentation (Close)

COI Panel Review

Vocabulary Package and

provide Recommendations to

Sponsor

Ensure ontology

reuse

Information

Exchange

Reuse?

No

Extract Reusable

Information Exchange

Assets from previous

DRMs

Yes

DRM

-COI Charter (Open)

-List of information assets (Open)

-Vocabulary Package (WIP)

-Authoritative data Source (ADS) Mapping (WIP)



-Ontology (WIP)















-Resourcing (WIP)

Define Platform

Compliance

Requirements

Identify Business /

War Fighter

Enterpise

Architecture

Compliance

Requirements

Search the

Enterpise

Architecture to

identify additional

compliance

requirements

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


SRM























Proceed to COA

Evaluation Decision

Revise

Match Compliance

Requirements to

individual information

exchanges, services

and function

Operational

Baseline

Target CEIT

Baseline

Fu

nct

ion

al/S

ME

Sp

on

sor

Sys

tem

En

gin

ee

rin

gP

roje

ct L

ea

d /

Pro

du

ct C

en

ter

Arc

hite

ctu

re

Pla

tfo

rm

En

gin

ee

rin

gT

est

ing

ITL

CA

Q A

uth

ori

tyC

on

tra

ctin

gF

ina

nce

A

sso

cia

ted

P

EO

/PM

OG

ove

rna

nce

(C

&A

)

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor

Functional / SMEFunctional / SME

Sponsor

System Engineering


Architecture

Testing


ITLC

AQ Authority

Finance

PEO/PMO

Governance (C&A)

Acquire Capability

"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Participate in

Kickoff Session

Participate in Kickoff Session

Begin Step 4

Review Bounded

User Requirements

(Acquisition

Strategy Package)

Identify Kickoff

meeting attendees

Call Kickoff

Meeting

Facilitate Kickoff

Meeting

Identify the POC's that will support the Project Lead during the

implementation of the Bounded User Requirements Create Top Level IMS









Participate in

Kickoff Session

Approve

IMS

Execute Appropriate IMS

Activities


Activities

Task POCs to

execute IMS


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities

Yes

Proceed Back to Beginning of Step 4

No


Activities


Activities

Proceed to Step 5

Participate in

Kickoff Session

Task POCs for IMS Input













Complete IMS

Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (Open)

- Product Center Activities (Open)

-Contracting Activities

-Acquisition Activities

- PEO Activities (Open)

-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment

- Finance Activities (Open)

-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources

- Architecture Activities (Open)

-Air Force EA Compliance

-Air Force EA artifact generation

-FEA, DOD EA, BEA Compliance

Engineering

- System Engineering Activities (Open)

-SEMP/TEMP Update Activities

-Requirement traceability activities

-Compliance/Certification Activities

-Help Desk Activities

-Versioning and CM activities

-Data Deployment Strategy Service

-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing

-COTS Product Configuration

-Code Generation

-Developer Testing

-Pre-Deployment Activities (Open)

-Platform Engineering Activities

-Test environment definition

-Test environment provisioning

-Platform Adjustment and Tuning Activities

-Platform provisioning

-Security Activities

-Data Deployment Strategy

-Service Deployment Strategy

-Legacy System Interface Engineering Activities

-Testing Activities

-Government Unit acceptance Testing

-Platform Integration Testing

-Performance Measurement Testing

-Deployment Activities (Open)

-Monitoring Activities

-Maintenance Support Activities

-COOP

-Failover and Recovery activities

-Product Deployment Activities

-Deployment Strategy

-Operations & Sustainment (Open)

Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)

- Product Center Activities (WIP)



- PEO Activities (WIP)

-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment

- Finance Activities (WIP)

-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources

- Architecture Activities (WIP)




Engineering

- System Engineering Activities (WIP)







-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing

-Pre-Deployment Activities (WIP)










-Testing Activities




-Deployment Activities (WIP)



-COOP




-Operations & Sustainment (WIP)

Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





IMS (Close)

Programmatic (Close)

- Product Center Activities (Close)



- PEO Activities (Close)

-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment

- Finance Activities (Close)

-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources

- Architecture Activities (Close)




Engineering

- System Engineering Activities (Close)







-Development (Close)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing

-Pre-Deployment Activities (Close)










-Testing Activities




-Deployment Activities (Close)



-COOP




-Operations & Sustainment (Close)

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Complete notional

Development

Schedule











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Draft IMS (Open)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Review Notional

Development

Schedule and Kick

off meeting

attendees

Validate IMS to M-

Implementation Plan

Write SOW / Task Order

(with data rights required)

Develop Code

Configure COTS/GOTS

Modify Legacy Systems/COTS-

GOTS/Web Services

Update "M" - DOTLPF

Change Management Plan

(ex. Training, Help Desk)

SOW/Task

Order

-Developer

Guidance

DOTLPF Change Management

Plan (From Step 3)

Draft Test Plan

Implementation

Baseline

Provision Development

Environment

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Initiate Government

Acceptance

Source code review

Source Code Review Criteria

-Target Baseline

-Function Correct

-No Malware, Virus, Back Doors

-No Common Vulnerability (CVE)

-No Accessibility Points

SME Quick Look Criteria

-Presentation Layer Review

-Basic Functionality

-Unit Test Results

Engage SME for User

Quick Look

Perform User Quick

Look

Discuss Government

Acceptance and

determine next steps

All Stop

Next

Steps

All Stop

Close out contract / task

order

Validate Developer

Testing

Government

Accept?

(w/ Sponsor)

Developer Test Criteria

-Code compiles

-Passes Developer Unit Tests

-Meets Bounded User Requirements

User Quick Look Failed

Source Code / DT Failed

Government Accepted

Government Accepted Developer Package (WIP)

-Source Code (WIP)

-Build Materials (WIP)

-Training Documentation (WIP)

-Development Environment Documentation (WIP)

-Integration / Test Environment Documentation (WIP)

-Independent Test Organization Report (Open)

-Test Data Documentation (WIP)

-Developer Testing Results (Close)

-Open Deficiency Reports(WIP)

-Prioritzed Corrections List(Open)

Open Deficiency Reports

for ITLC to fix

ITLC to Fix


-Source Code (WIP)





-Independent Test Organization Report (WIP)




-Prioritzed Corrections List(Close)

Proceed to Step 3 -

Determine COA Evaluation Criteria

Proceed to Step 3

Government Acceptance

Contracting

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor

Functional / SME Func

tiona

l/SM

ESp

onso

rIT

LCSy

stem

Eng

inee

ring

Arch

itect

ure

Test

ing

Plat

form

Eng

inee

ring

Netw

ork

Op's

Proj

ect L

ead

/ Pro

duct

Cen

ter

Gov

erna

nce

(C&

A)

System Engineering

Perform Integration

(Service, COTS & Legacy)

Testing

Architecture

ITLC


Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME



Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Architecture

Testing


Network Ops


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Rebuild Capability In the

environment

Verify Rebuild

(Spot Check)

Pass?

Fix & Update Code

package

Initiate Integration

& Testing

Perform Limited User evaluation of Integrated

Functionality

User

Evaluation &

Integration

Successful?

Discuss User Evaluation

& Integration results with

Project Leader and


Fix & Update Code

package

Create Tech Order for Deployment

Yes

Conduct

Net worthiness Review

Begin Step 5

Conduct Limited User

Evaluation

Engage SME for Limited User

evaluation

Update Test plans and

Procedures

Provision Integration/Test

Environment

Perform Independent Testing

Analyze Test

Report

Fix & Update Code package

Independent Testing

Successful?

Success

Discuss Independent Test

results and determine next steps

Continue?

Proceed to Selected Step

Proceed to Sponsor Selected Step

Major Change Required

SRM




-Functional Requirements( Close) -Service Levels (Close)





-Information Exchange Requirements (Close) -Functional Requirements( Close)










-On Boarding Requirements (Close)_________________AS Deployed_____________

Version Reference to Deployed Software Repository (Open) - Source Code Reference (Open) - Training Material (Open) - Test Results (WIP)Testing Activities (WIP)

Participate in User

Evaluation

Create Authorization Attribute Mapping based on Authorization

Documentation

Update C&A

information

Specify Integration/Test

Environment

Develop Help Desk Materials

For Tier 1

Develop Training Materials and performance

Measures & Metrics

Support Help Desk Material

Development

Support Training Material

Development

SRM

-Contextual Model (Close)-Web Service Code Requirements (WIP)





-Automated Information Assets (Close) -Reuse components (Close)













_________________AS Deployed___________

Version Reference to Deployed Software Repository (Open) - Source Code Reference (Open) - Training Material (Open) - Test Results (Open)Testing Activities (Open)

IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing





-Platform Adjustment and Tuning

Activities





-Legacy System Interface Engineering

Activities

-Testing Activities


-Platforming Integration Testing





-COOP





Yes

DRM







-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT_________________

Attribute Authorization Mapping Package (WIP)

-SysAd Instructions (WIP)

Initiates Deployment

iTRM Application Alignment

Evaluation (of as built )

Deployment Package

-Deployment Tech Order (WIP)

- Executable Code (Open)

- Help Desk Guidance (Close) - Training Materials (Close)

- Configuration Instructions (WIP)

- Installation Instructions (Open)


-Monitoring Instructions (Close)

-Deployment Readiness Assertion (Open)-C&A Certification package (WIP)

-iTRM Application Alignment Assertion (Close)

-User's Evaluation Assertion (Open)

-Functional & Performance Assertion (Open)

Update IMS with

Deployment Activities

IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Deployment Package


- Executable Code (Close)

- Help Desk Guidance (Close)

- Training Materials (Close)

- Configuration Instructions (Close)

- Installation Instructions (Close)

-SysAd Instructions (Close)


-Deployment Readiness Assertion (Open)

-C&A Certification package (Close)


-User's Evaluation Assertion (Close)

-Functional & Performance Assertion (Close)

Deployment Package

-Deployment Tech Order (Close)








-Deployment Readiness Assertion (Close)





-Operational Test Components (Close)

DRM




-Authoritative data Source (ADS) Mapping (Close) -Roles and permissions (Close)


-Ontology (Close)


__________AS BUILT_______

Attribute Authorization Mapping Package (Open)

-SysAd Instructions (Open)

Initiate Lifecycle Activities

No

Perform Test

Procedure Dry Run

All Stop

All Stop

Deployment Package

-Deployment Tech Order (WIP) - Executable Code (Close) - Help Desk Guidance (Close) - Training Materials (Close) - Configuration Instructions (Close) - Installation Instructions (Close) -SysAd Instructions (Close) -Monitoring Instructions (Close)-Deployment Readiness Assertion (Open)-C&A Certification package (WIP)-iTRM Application Alignment Assertion (Close)-User's Evaluation Assertion (Close)-Functional & Performance Assertion (Close)

Deployment Package

-Deployment Tech Order (WIP) - Executable Code (Close) - Help Desk Guidance (Close) - Training Materials (Close) - Configuration Instructions (Close) - Installation Instructions (Close) -SysAd Instructions (Close) -Monitoring Instructions (Close)-Deployment Readiness Assertion (Open)-C&A Certification package (WIP)-iTRM Application Alignment Assertion (Close)-User's Evaluation Assertion (Open)-Functional & Performance Assertion (Open)

Generate Recommended

solutions for failures in test report

Determine Return

Point

Continue?


All Stop

All Stop

Determine Return Point

Major Change

SRM























_________________AS Deployed____________

_

Version Reference to Deployed Software

Repository (Close)

- Source Code Reference (Close)

- Training Material (Close)

- Test Results (Close)

Update the

"As Deployed" Architecture

Proceed to Step 6

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT____________




Network Ops

System Engineering

Sponsor

Functional / SME


For Tier 2


For Tier 3

Initiate Helpdesk

Documentation ("M" portion of the DOTMLPF)

BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)






-BPR Assertion


Implementation

Baseline

Minor Correction

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed_____________


Sponsor Review Package (From Step 3)

-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)-COA Package (Close)

-COAs (Close)




-COA Compliance Requirements (Close) -Onboarding Compliance Rqts (Close)





- Dependencies (Close) - Constraints (Close)



Bounded User Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Integration of Build Package

Components

Integration of Build Package with

infrastructure


external interfaces

Build Package (WIP) -Source Code (WIP)





-Independent Test Organization Report (WIP) -Independent Test Organization Plans and Procedures (WIP)



-Open Deficiency Reports (WIP)

-Prioritized Corrections List (Close)































Minor Change

No





















Deployment Readiness

Evaluation Criteria

-C&A Complete

-Net Worthiness Complete

-Testing Successful

-DOT_LPF Readiness

Deployment Readiness?

ITLC Fix

No Yes

Coordinate & Evaluate DOT_LPF Activities

Complete DOT_LPF Activities

Wait on DOT_LPF

DOTMLPF (From Step 2)

Implementation Plan

-Characterized execution requirements

-ROI and investment auditability

-Work plans

-BCA



Deployment Package-Deployment Tech Order (WIP)





- Installation Instructions (Close) -SysAd Instructions (Close)



-C&A Certification package (WIP)


-User's Evaluation Assertion (Close)-Functional & Performance Assertion (Close)

Specify Monitoring Instructions

Governance (C&A) Governance (C&A) Governance (C&A) Governance (C&A)

Func

tiona

l/SME

Spon

sor

ITLC

Arch

itectu

re

Testi

ngPl

atfor

m En

ginee

ring

Netw

ork O

p'sPr

oject

Lead

/ Pro

duct

Cente

r

"Sandbox"M-Implementation Plan (From Step 3)










than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

System Engineering

Testing


Network Op's


Network Op's


System Engineering

"Sandbox"

Deployment Package (From Step 5)

-Deployment Tech Order (Close) - Executable Code (Close) - Help Desk Guidance (Close) - Training Materials (Close) - Configuration Instructions (Close) - Installation Instructions (Close) -SysAd Instructions (Close) -Monitoring Instructions (Close)-Deployment Readiness Assertion (Close)-C&A Certification package (Close)-iTRM Application Alignment Assertion (Close)-User's Evaluation Assertion (WIP)-Functional & Performance Assertion (Close)-Net-Worthiness (Close)

Initiate Deployment

Provision Prototype to

operational environment

Help Desk Prototype

Training

IMS (Close)Programmatic (Close)- Product Center Activities (Close) -Contracting Activities -Acquisition Activities- PEO Activities (Close) -Resourcing -Training -Equipment- Finance Activities (Close) -Allocate Funds -Assign Resources- Architecture Activities (Close) -Air Force EA Compliance -Air Force EA artifact generation -FEA, DOD EA, BEA ComplianceEngineering- System Engineering Activities (Close) -SEMP/TEMP Update Activities -Requirement traceability activities -Compliance/Certification Activities -Help Desk Activities -Versioning and CM activities -Data Deployment Strategy Service-Development (Close) -Component Designs -Blue Printing -COTS Product Configuration -Code Generation -Developer Testing-Pre-Deployment Activities (Close) -Platform Engineering Activities -Test environment definition -Test environment provisioning -Platform Adjustment and Tuning Activities -Platform provisioning -Security Activities -Data Deployment Strategy -Service Deployment Strategy -Legacy System Interface Engineering Activities -Testing Activities -Government Unit acceptance Testing -Platform Integration Testing -Performance Measurement Testing-Deployment Activities (Close) -Monitoring Activities -Maintenance Support Activities -COOP -Failover and Recovery activities -Product Deployment Activities -Deployment Strategy -Operations & Sustainment (Close)

Install Prototype

Begin Step 6

Install

Successful?

User Evaluation of

Prototype

OT&E and KPP evaluation

of Prototype

Assessment of

Prototype

Approved

and Ready

to Field?

Yes

No

Yes

Return to

Step 5

No

Obtain DAA Approval for

the ATT for the Prototype

Engage users for

Prototype Training

Perform User training for

Prototype

Return to

Step 5

Provision User Access for

Prototype

Complete Help Desk

Training


the ATO

Train Users Per Phasing

Plan

All Phases

Complete?

Provision Access to

trained users per phasing

plan

No

Conduct Post

Implementation Review

(PIR)

PIR

Successful?

End SDDP

Yes

Return to

Sponsor Selected Point

No

SRM


-Web Service Code Requirements (Close)





















__________AS Deployed_____________

Version Reference to Deployed Software Repository (Close)




-Operational Test &

Evaluation Report (Open)

-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans

and Procedures (Open)

-Post Implementation Review (PIR) Report (Open)

Certification Package

(WIP)

-Net-Worthiness

(Close)

-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Open)

Certification Package (Close)

-Net-Worthiness (Close)

-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Close)

Provision Per Phasing

Plan


SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &

Evaluation Report (Close)

-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans

and Procedures (Close)


SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans


-Post Implementation Review (PIR) Report (Close)

SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



Update IMS with

Fielding Activities

Yes

Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Deployment Package

-Deployment Tech Order (Close) - Executable Code (Close) - Help Desk Guidance (Close) - Training Materials (Close) - Configuration Instructions (Close) - Installation Instructions (Close) -SysAd Instructions (Close) -Monitoring Instructions (Close)-Deployment Readiness Assertion (Close)-C&A Certification package (Close)-iTRM Application Alignment Assertion (Close)-User's Evaluation Assertion (Close)-Functional & Performance Assertion (Close)-Net-Worthiness (Close)

Deployment Package















Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

Testing


User Evaluation of

Prototype

Update DOT_LPF

Implementation Plan

M-Implementation Plan (From Step 3)










than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

PRM

BRM

SRM

DRM

TRM

Captured in and informed by

enterprise architecture


PURPOSE

Establish a plan to implement the capabilities across the DOTMLPF

spectrum that are necessary to solve the user’s problems and/or

satisfy the user’s needs.

OUTCOMES

■ Re-engineered Air Force processes to improve efficiency and

effectiveness to deliver the capabilities

■ Definition of the DOTMLPF executable actions and the

implementation plan

■ Sponsor approval to pursue the investigation of the Materiel

Solution

Identify

DOTMLPF

Capability

Requirements

Define

DOTMLPF

Executable

Actions

Define Materiel

Solution and

Implementation

Plan

Plan / implement

developmental

components of

the Materiel

Solution

Sustain

Application

Lifecycle

Deploy/Operate

the Materiel

Solution


Fu

nctio

nal/ S

ME

Sponsor

Architecture T

eam

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

"Sandbox"

.




"Sandbox"



Identified

Top Level

Need

Start


Statement of

Need/Problem

Statement

Review and

Approve statement

of need/problem

statement and work

plan with Sponsor.





milestones and


requirements)

Gather known LRP

requirements


DOD Directives,


and OMB, GAO, BTA

Findings

Determine

Sub-Capability



Prioritization of



criteria

Verify Requirements

Satisfy

all relevant LRP

Constraints

Conduct Enterprise



Strategy

Determine potential


other enterprise

requirements

Sponsor

Approval?

Receive Needs Data

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Open)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (WIP)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Query 'As is'

Repository for

related LRP.


PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Complete

Sub-Capability


of PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(WIP)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)


Sub-Capabilities

Requirements?


measures and Key


section of PRM

Template

Identify existing

Key Performance


the Sub-Capability,

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Document :

Statement

of Need /

Problem

Statement


List: Laws,

Regulations,

Policies

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

NoEnterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?




GAO, BTA Findings


PRM Template

No

Yes

End 1.2



LRP.)

Begin 1.3

Decompose

Need/Problem

Statement into

Sub-Capabilities

Needs

PRM

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 1.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 2.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree N.

Query Architecture

to look for similar

Sub-Capabilities

End 1.3 Begin 1.4


identify the Key


Report:

Identified

attributes to

satisfy the

capability

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Determine

Sub-Capability

requirements


Complete

Sub-Capability

Requirement section

of PRM Template

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes





End 1.4

Begin 1.5

Engage the

Enterprise

Architecture Team

End 1.5

Begin 1.6

Submit

Capabilities

Requirements for

approval

Determine Initial

Scope with general

cost estimate


End 1.6

Review

Capability

Requirements

Corporate

Approval?

Yes

Report:

Performance

Requirements

for the

Capability

No

Yes

All Stop

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Document: Laws,

Regulations and

Policy constrains/

mandates with

findings for

relevance

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Report:

Sub-Capabilities

for the Need

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

All Stop









No

All Stop

Go to Step 2

Approved

Revise

DeniedApproved

Revise

Denied Approved

Denied

Proceed Previous


Revise

Proceed to


No

No

Fu

nctio

nal/

SM

ES

ponsor

Process T

eam

Architectu

re T

eam








Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Process Team

"Sandbox"


PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Start

SDDP 2.0

Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis



may be affected by


processes have been


addressed



Ensure processes



Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis

Capture DOTMLPF

interdependencies



processes




of these processes




enterprise level

Develop


formal review

and approval to

proceed


BPR

Package BPR


Register content

in Business

Reference Model

Process

Engineering

Content

Approved?

Yes

BRM








(Open)

BRM







-BPR Assertion




process step





steps




BPR

Assertion

Complete?

Yes

Revise



Define ROI and


Build work plans

Generate BCA

Ensure All expected


address/satisfied

Define Mission


DOTMLPF Capability

Requirements

High Level

Process

describing

expected

outcomes

Work plan

approved?



required

Approved

Revise



Team (I.E "Yellow







No

Characterize the

DOTMLPF execution



and be successful

Execution

Requirements

Approved?

Approved

Begin End

Process

Engineering

DOTMLPF

Implementation

Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

BRM








Process

Information

from SME


to Deliver DOTMLPF


All Stop

Denied

Proceed to Process


No

Proceed to Step 3

All Stop

Denied

All Stop

Denied

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

YesCorporate

Approval?

Yes

Approved

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

No

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)


Process Engineering

Activities

BRM








(Open)

Work Plan

SDDP 1 & 2

- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones

(from Step 1)

Revise

Functional/S

ME

Spon

sor

Syste

m E

ngin

eering

/ D

esig

n

Arc

hitectu

re T

eam

CO

I/E

VT

Govern

ance

Pro

ject Lead / P

roduct

Cente

rP

latform

En

gin

eering

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor


COI / EVT

Governance




Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance


Governance

Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance




"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Onboarding






Center

Go to SDDP Step 4

BRM from

Step 2

Begin Finish

Lift information

puts/gets for each

process model





put/get within the

process


flow necessary to


from the process





to meet the process





implementation






Contextual Model

Approve

Review Package

and Select

COA?



Web Service Code /



Model

All Stop

Revise

Denied

Begin 3.0

Start

Material

Solution

Design

Review

and Approve,

Contextual Model

and Work

Plan

All Stop

Approved

Denied


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)















Revise

Contextual Model





Architecture

Support?

No


of solution options

Yes



Web Service Code /



Model

Auditable

Process

model 1

Auditable

Process

model 2

Auditable

Process

model N

Contextual

model for

Process 1

Contextual

model for

Process 2

Contextual

model for

Process N



- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones




COA to DOTLPF


material solution

Additional

Process

Flows?

Yes

SME

Validation of

Contextual

Model?

Architecture

Support?

No

Yes





Approve

Bounded User

Requirements?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

All Stop

Approved?

SWG review of

Governance

Package

IRB review of

Governance

Package

Greater than

$1M

Approved Yes

Denied

Validate

Contextual Model

content



each COA

DBSMC review of

Governance

Package

No

No


contextual model

Yes

Update DOTMLPF

Implementation plan

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Assemble

Governance

package

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Approved?

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

All Stop

Denied







-SLAs (Open)


CMO review of

Governance

Package

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Derive additional

infrastructure

service necessary

to support COA

Update

Implementation

Plan

Approved

Derive mission


requirements

Conduct

infrastructure

topology analysis

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (WIP)















-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Conduct Cost

Estimates for each

COA

SRM























Create Draft



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














SRM























SRM
























exchanges / assets









requirement.

Charter Approved

by SWG?

Approve COI

vocabulary

package

Identify

authoritative

and source data

from a process

perspective

Identify ADS

Determine access

rules ,roles and



Stand Up

COI

Develop Draft

Ontology

Stand Down

COI

Proceed to


No

SWG Approval

COI Vocabulary

package

Yes

Generate

Vocabulary

Package

Proceed to


No

SRM























SRM























DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)






-Ontology (Open)


DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)




(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


DRM





(WIP)



-Ontology (WIP)


Yes


wants to use each

put/get (ex.


LRP Compliance



-PIA (Open)

-FISMA (Open)

-NDAA (Open)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Open)





checklist

Identify evidence

that can satisfy

compliance

requirements

LRP Compliance



-PIA (Close)

-FISMA (Close)

-NDAA (Close)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Close)



Contextual Model

Provide to Sponsor

recommended


COAs to satisfy the

Contextual Model














-Resourcing (WIP)











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Based on the COA




-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)


















requirements

DRM





Mapping (Close)



-Ontology (Close)





Exposure Services

Initiate COI

Coordination


SWG


No



development

Draft a new COI

charter or revise


Approved and

COA Selected






DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)


(Open)



(ADS) Mapping (WIP)


(WIP)


(WIP)

-Ontology (WIP)


Sponsor

Champions

ADS

Yes

Identify additional

information

exchanges requiring

new implementation




Sponsor

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

Yes

Corporate

Approval?

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

Yes

No

SRM























SRM





































-Resourcing (WIP)

Determine

Distributing

Computing

requirements

Develop service


Develop Service

Levels

Agreements

(SLA's) for each

layer of service

Review Legacy

System

Requirements







-SLAs (Close)


Provide Sponsor

Cost Estimate

Updates


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)


-COAs (Close)














Update cost

estimates to M-

Implementation

Plan

BRM (From Step 2)








(Close)

BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)

-Auditable Process

(Close)



Information Assets

(Close)


-BPR Assertion


COI Panel Review



Sponsor

Ensure ontology

reuse

Information

Exchange

Reuse?

No

Extract Reusable



DRMs

Yes

DRM

-COI Charter (Open)






-Ontology (WIP)















-Resourcing (WIP)

Define Platform

Compliance

Requirements

Identify Business /

War Fighter

Enterpise

Architecture

Compliance

Requirements

Search the

Enterpise

Architecture to

identify additional

compliance

requirements

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


SRM























Proceed to COA

Evaluation Decision

Revise

Match Compliance

Requirements to


exchanges, services

and function

Operational

Baseline

Target CEIT

Baseline

Fu

nct

ion

al/S

ME

Sp

on

sor

Sys

tem

En

gin

ee

rin

gP

roje

ct L

ea

d /

Pro

du

ct C

en

ter

Arc

hite

ctu

re

Pla

tfo

rm

En

gin

ee

rin

gT

est

ing

ITL

CA

Q A

uth

ori

tyC

on

tra

ctin

gF

ina

nce

A

sso

cia

ted

P

EO

/PM

OG

ove

rna

nce

(C

&A

)

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


Sponsor

System Engineering


Architecture

Testing


ITLC

AQ Authority

Finance

PEO/PMO

Governance (C&A)

Acquire Capability

"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Participate in

Kickoff Session


Begin Step 4

Review Bounded

User Requirements

(Acquisition

Strategy Package)

Identify Kickoff

meeting attendees

Call Kickoff

Meeting

Facilitate Kickoff

Meeting











Participate in

Kickoff Session

Approve

IMS


Activities


Activities

Task POCs to

execute IMS


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities

Yes


No


Activities


Activities

Proceed to Step 5

Participate in

Kickoff Session














Complete IMS

Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Complete notional

Development

Schedule











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Draft IMS (Open)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Review Notional

Development

Schedule and Kick

off meeting

attendees

Validate IMS to M-

Implementation Plan



Develop Code

Configure COTS/GOTS


GOTS/Web Services

Update "M" - DOTLPF



SOW/Task

Order

-Developer

Guidance


Plan (From Step 3)

Draft Test Plan

Implementation

Baseline


Environment

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Initiate Government

Acceptance

Source code review


-Target Baseline

-Function Correct







-Unit Test Results

Engage SME for User

Quick Look

Perform User Quick

Look

Discuss Government

Acceptance and


All Stop

Next

Steps

All Stop


order

Validate Developer

Testing

Government

Accept?

(w/ Sponsor)


-Code compiles





Government Accepted


-Source Code (WIP)











for ITLC to fix

ITLC to Fix


-Source Code (WIP)










Proceed to Step 3 -


Proceed to Step 3


Contracting

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


tiona

l/SM

ESp

onso

rIT

LCSy

stem

Eng

inee

ring

Arch

itect

ure

Test

ing

Plat

form

Eng

inee

ring

Netw

ork

Op's

Proj

ect L

ead

/ Pro

duct

Cen

ter

Gov

erna

nce

(C&

A)

System Engineering

Perform Integration


Testing

Architecture

ITLC


Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME



Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Architecture

Testing


Network Ops


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


environment

Verify Rebuild

(Spot Check)

Pass?

Fix & Update Code

package


& Testing


Functionality

User

Evaluation &

Integration

Successful?



Project Leader and


Fix & Update Code

package


Yes

Conduct


Begin Step 5


Evaluation


evaluation


Procedures


Environment


Analyze Test

Report


Independent Testing

Successful?

Success



Continue?




SRM





















Participate in User

Evaluation


Documentation

Update C&A

information


Environment


For Tier 1


Measures & Metrics


Development


Development

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed___________


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Yes

DRM







-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT_________________






Deployment Package












Update IMS with


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Deployment Package














Deployment Package















DRM






-Ontology (Close)


__________AS BUILT_______




No

Perform Test

Procedure Dry Run

All Stop

All Stop

Deployment Package


Deployment Package




Determine Return

Point

Continue?


All Stop

All Stop


Major Change

SRM























_________________AS Deployed____________

_


Repository (Close)




Update the


Proceed to Step 6

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT____________




Network Ops

System Engineering

Sponsor

Functional / SME


For Tier 2


For Tier 3

Initiate Helpdesk


BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)






-BPR Assertion


Implementation

Baseline

Minor Correction

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed_____________



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)


-COAs (Close)














-SRM

-DRM


Components


infrastructure


external interfaces









































Minor Change

No






















Evaluation Criteria

-C&A Complete


-Testing Successful

-DOT_LPF Readiness


ITLC Fix

No Yes



Wait on DOT_LPF


Implementation Plan



-Work plans

-BCA
















Func

tiona

l/SME

Spon

sor

ITLC

Arch

itectu

re

Testi

ngPl

atfor

m En

ginee

ring

Netw

ork O

p'sPr

oject

Lead

/ Pro

duct

Cente

r











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

System Engineering

Testing


Network Op's


Network Op's


System Engineering

"Sandbox"



Initiate Deployment



Help Desk Prototype

Training


Install Prototype

Begin Step 6

Install

Successful?

User Evaluation of

Prototype


of Prototype

Assessment of

Prototype

Approved

and Ready

to Field?

Yes

No

Yes

Return to

Step 5

No



Engage users for

Prototype Training


Prototype

Return to

Step 5


Prototype

Complete Help Desk

Training


the ATO


Plan

All Phases

Complete?

Provision Access to


plan

No

Conduct Post


(PIR)

PIR

Successful?

End SDDP

Yes

Return to


No

SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans




(WIP)

-Net-Worthiness

(Close)

-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Open)



-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Close)


Plan


SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



Update IMS with

Fielding Activities

Yes

Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

Testing


User Evaluation of

Prototype

Update DOT_LPF

Implementation Plan











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

PRM

BRM

SRM

DRM

TRM



SDDP Step 2


PURPOSE

Define the Materiel Solution component of the DOTMLPF capabilities

and to plan the implementation of the Materiel Solution.

OUTCOMES

■ The bounded user requirement (BUR) that includes definition of

the materiel solution, information and data sources, and

implementation plan. The plan should:

Consider implementation methods, e.g., Web services code,

systems, and COTS/GOTS.

Optimize reuse.

■ Approval by Air Force corporate structure to fund / execute the

implementation of Materiel Solution.

Identify

DOTMLPF

Capability

Requirements

Define

DOTMLPF

Executable

Actions

Define Materiel

Solution and

Implementation

Plan

Plan / implement

developmental

components of

the Materiel

Solution

Sustain

Application

Lifecycle

Deploy/Operate

the Materiel

Solution


Fu

nctio

nal/ S

ME

Sponsor

Architecture T

eam

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

"Sandbox"

.




"Sandbox"



Identified

Top Level

Need

Start


Statement of

Need/Problem

Statement

Review and

Approve statement

of need/problem

statement and work

plan with Sponsor.





milestones and


requirements)

Gather known LRP

requirements


DOD Directives,


and OMB, GAO, BTA

Findings

Determine

Sub-Capability



Prioritization of



criteria

Verify Requirements

Satisfy

all relevant LRP

Constraints

Conduct Enterprise



Strategy

Determine potential


other enterprise

requirements

Sponsor

Approval?

Receive Needs Data

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Open)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (WIP)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Query 'As is'

Repository for

related LRP.


PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Complete

Sub-Capability


of PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(WIP)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)


Sub-Capabilities

Requirements?


measures and Key


section of PRM

Template

Identify existing

Key Performance


the Sub-Capability,

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Document :

Statement

of Need /

Problem

Statement


List: Laws,

Regulations,

Policies

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

NoEnterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?




GAO, BTA Findings


PRM Template

No

Yes

End 1.2



LRP.)

Begin 1.3

Decompose

Need/Problem

Statement into

Sub-Capabilities

Needs

PRM

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 1.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 2.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree N.

Query Architecture

to look for similar

Sub-Capabilities

End 1.3 Begin 1.4


identify the Key


Report:

Identified

attributes to

satisfy the

capability

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Determine

Sub-Capability

requirements


Complete

Sub-Capability

Requirement section

of PRM Template

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes





End 1.4

Begin 1.5

Engage the

Enterprise

Architecture Team

End 1.5

Begin 1.6

Submit

Capabilities

Requirements for

approval

Determine Initial

Scope with general

cost estimate


End 1.6

Review

Capability

Requirements

Corporate

Approval?

Yes

Report:

Performance

Requirements

for the

Capability

No

Yes

All Stop

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Document: Laws,

Regulations and

Policy constrains/

mandates with

findings for

relevance

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Report:

Sub-Capabilities

for the Need

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

All Stop









No

All Stop

Go to Step 2

Approved

Revise

DeniedApproved

Revise

Denied Approved

Denied

Proceed Previous


Revise

Proceed to


No

No

Fu

nctio

nal/

SM

ES

ponsor

Process T

eam

Architectu

re T

eam








Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Process Team

"Sandbox"


PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Start

SDDP 2.0

Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis



may be affected by


processes have been


addressed



Ensure processes



Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis

Capture DOTMLPF

interdependencies



processes




of these processes




enterprise level

Develop


formal review

and approval to

proceed


BPR

Package BPR


Register content

in Business

Reference Model

Process

Engineering

Content

Approved?

Yes

BRM








(Open)

BRM







-BPR Assertion




process step





steps




BPR

Assertion

Complete?

Yes

Revise



Define ROI and


Build work plans

Generate BCA

Ensure All expected


address/satisfied

Define Mission


DOTMLPF Capability

Requirements

High Level

Process

describing

expected

outcomes

Work plan

approved?



required

Approved

Revise



Team (I.E "Yellow







No

Characterize the

DOTMLPF execution



and be successful

Execution

Requirements

Approved?

Approved

Begin End

Process

Engineering

DOTMLPF

Implementation

Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

BRM








Process

Information

from SME


to Deliver DOTMLPF


All Stop

Denied

Proceed to Process


No

Proceed to Step 3

All Stop

Denied

All Stop

Denied

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

YesCorporate

Approval?

Yes

Approved

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

No

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)


Process Engineering

Activities

BRM








(Open)

Work Plan

SDDP 1 & 2

- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones

(from Step 1)

Revise

Functional/S

ME

Spon

sor

Syste

m E

ngin

eering

/ D

esig

n

Arc

hitectu

re T

eam

CO

I/E

VT

Govern

ance

Pro

ject Lead / P

roduct

Cente

rP

latform

En

gin

eering

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor


COI / EVT

Governance




Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance


Governance

Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance




"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Onboarding






Center

Go to SDDP Step 4

BRM from

Step 2

Begin Finish

Lift information

puts/gets for each

process model





put/get within the

process


flow necessary to


from the process





to meet the process





implementation






Contextual Model

Approve

Review Package

and Select

COA?



Web Service Code /



Model

All Stop

Revise

Denied

Begin 3.0

Start

Material

Solution

Design

Review

and Approve,

Contextual Model

and Work

Plan

All Stop

Approved

Denied


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)















Revise

Contextual Model





Architecture

Support?

No


of solution options

Yes



Web Service Code /



Model

Auditable

Process

model 1

Auditable

Process

model 2

Auditable

Process

model N

Contextual

model for

Process 1

Contextual

model for

Process 2

Contextual

model for

Process N



- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones




COA to DOTLPF


material solution

Additional

Process

Flows?

Yes

SME

Validation of

Contextual

Model?

Architecture

Support?

No

Yes





Approve

Bounded User

Requirements?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

All Stop

Approved?

SWG review of

Governance

Package

IRB review of

Governance

Package

Greater than

$1M

Approved Yes

Denied

Validate

Contextual Model

content



each COA

DBSMC review of

Governance

Package

No

No


contextual model

Yes

Update DOTMLPF

Implementation plan

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Assemble

Governance

package

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Approved?

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

All Stop

Denied







-SLAs (Open)


CMO review of

Governance

Package

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Derive additional

infrastructure

service necessary

to support COA

Update

Implementation

Plan

Approved

Derive mission


requirements

Conduct

infrastructure

topology analysis

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (WIP)















-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Conduct Cost

Estimates for each

COA

SRM























Create Draft



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














SRM























SRM
























exchanges / assets









requirement.

Charter Approved

by SWG?

Approve COI

vocabulary

package

Identify

authoritative

and source data

from a process

perspective

Identify ADS

Determine access

rules ,roles and



Stand Up

COI

Develop Draft

Ontology

Stand Down

COI

Proceed to


No

SWG Approval

COI Vocabulary

package

Yes

Generate

Vocabulary

Package

Proceed to


No

SRM























SRM























DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)






-Ontology (Open)


DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)




(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


DRM





(WIP)



-Ontology (WIP)


Yes


wants to use each

put/get (ex.


LRP Compliance



-PIA (Open)

-FISMA (Open)

-NDAA (Open)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Open)





checklist

Identify evidence

that can satisfy

compliance

requirements

LRP Compliance



-PIA (Close)

-FISMA (Close)

-NDAA (Close)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Close)



Contextual Model

Provide to Sponsor

recommended


COAs to satisfy the

Contextual Model














-Resourcing (WIP)











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Based on the COA




-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)


















requirements

DRM





Mapping (Close)



-Ontology (Close)





Exposure Services

Initiate COI

Coordination


SWG


No



development

Draft a new COI

charter or revise


Approved and

COA Selected






DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)


(Open)



(ADS) Mapping (WIP)


(WIP)


(WIP)

-Ontology (WIP)


Sponsor

Champions

ADS

Yes

Identify additional

information

exchanges requiring

new implementation




Sponsor

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

Yes

Corporate

Approval?

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

Yes

No

SRM























SRM





































-Resourcing (WIP)

Determine

Distributing

Computing

requirements

Develop service


Develop Service

Levels

Agreements

(SLA's) for each

layer of service

Review Legacy

System

Requirements







-SLAs (Close)


Provide Sponsor

Cost Estimate

Updates


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)


-COAs (Close)














Update cost

estimates to M-

Implementation

Plan

BRM (From Step 2)








(Close)

BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)

-Auditable Process

(Close)



Information Assets

(Close)


-BPR Assertion


COI Panel Review



Sponsor

Ensure ontology

reuse

Information

Exchange

Reuse?

No

Extract Reusable



DRMs

Yes

DRM

-COI Charter (Open)






-Ontology (WIP)















-Resourcing (WIP)

Define Platform

Compliance

Requirements

Identify Business /

War Fighter

Enterpise

Architecture

Compliance

Requirements

Search the

Enterpise

Architecture to

identify additional

compliance

requirements

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


SRM























Proceed to COA

Evaluation Decision

Revise

Match Compliance

Requirements to


exchanges, services

and function

Operational

Baseline

Target CEIT

Baseline

Fu

nct

ion

al/S

ME

Sp

on

sor

Sys

tem

En

gin

ee

rin

gP

roje

ct L

ea

d /

Pro

du

ct C

en

ter

Arc

hite

ctu

re

Pla

tfo

rm

En

gin

ee

rin

gT

est

ing

ITL

CA

Q A

uth

ori

tyC

on

tra

ctin

gF

ina

nce

A

sso

cia

ted

P

EO

/PM

OG

ove

rna

nce

(C

&A

)

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


Sponsor

System Engineering


Architecture

Testing


ITLC

AQ Authority

Finance

PEO/PMO

Governance (C&A)

Acquire Capability

"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Participate in

Kickoff Session


Begin Step 4

Review Bounded

User Requirements

(Acquisition

Strategy Package)

Identify Kickoff

meeting attendees

Call Kickoff

Meeting

Facilitate Kickoff

Meeting











Participate in

Kickoff Session

Approve

IMS


Activities


Activities

Task POCs to

execute IMS


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities

Yes


No


Activities


Activities

Proceed to Step 5

Participate in

Kickoff Session














Complete IMS

Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Complete notional

Development

Schedule











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Draft IMS (Open)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Review Notional

Development

Schedule and Kick

off meeting

attendees

Validate IMS to M-

Implementation Plan



Develop Code

Configure COTS/GOTS


GOTS/Web Services

Update "M" - DOTLPF



SOW/Task

Order

-Developer

Guidance


Plan (From Step 3)

Draft Test Plan

Implementation

Baseline


Environment

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Initiate Government

Acceptance

Source code review


-Target Baseline

-Function Correct







-Unit Test Results

Engage SME for User

Quick Look

Perform User Quick

Look

Discuss Government

Acceptance and


All Stop

Next

Steps

All Stop


order

Validate Developer

Testing

Government

Accept?

(w/ Sponsor)


-Code compiles





Government Accepted


-Source Code (WIP)











for ITLC to fix

ITLC to Fix


-Source Code (WIP)










Proceed to Step 3 -


Proceed to Step 3


Contracting

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


tiona

l/SM

ESp

onso

rIT

LCSy

stem

Eng

inee

ring

Arch

itect

ure

Test

ing

Plat

form

Eng

inee

ring

Netw

ork

Op's

Proj

ect L

ead

/ Pro

duct

Cen

ter

Gov

erna

nce

(C&

A)

System Engineering

Perform Integration


Testing

Architecture

ITLC


Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME



Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Architecture

Testing


Network Ops


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


environment

Verify Rebuild

(Spot Check)

Pass?

Fix & Update Code

package


& Testing


Functionality

User

Evaluation &

Integration

Successful?



Project Leader and


Fix & Update Code

package


Yes

Conduct


Begin Step 5


Evaluation


evaluation


Procedures


Environment


Analyze Test

Report


Independent Testing

Successful?

Success



Continue?




SRM





















Participate in User

Evaluation


Documentation

Update C&A

information


Environment


For Tier 1


Measures & Metrics


Development


Development

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed___________


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Yes

DRM







-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT_________________






Deployment Package












Update IMS with


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Deployment Package














Deployment Package















DRM






-Ontology (Close)


__________AS BUILT_______




No

Perform Test

Procedure Dry Run

All Stop

All Stop

Deployment Package


Deployment Package




Determine Return

Point

Continue?


All Stop

All Stop


Major Change

SRM























_________________AS Deployed____________

_


Repository (Close)




Update the


Proceed to Step 6

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT____________




Network Ops

System Engineering

Sponsor

Functional / SME


For Tier 2


For Tier 3

Initiate Helpdesk


BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)






-BPR Assertion


Implementation

Baseline

Minor Correction

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed_____________



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)


-COAs (Close)














-SRM

-DRM


Components


infrastructure


external interfaces









































Minor Change

No






















Evaluation Criteria

-C&A Complete


-Testing Successful

-DOT_LPF Readiness


ITLC Fix

No Yes



Wait on DOT_LPF


Implementation Plan



-Work plans

-BCA
















Func

tiona

l/SME

Spon

sor

ITLC

Arch

itectu

re

Testi

ngPl

atfor

m En

ginee

ring

Netw

ork O

p'sPr

oject

Lead

/ Pro

duct

Cente

r











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

System Engineering

Testing


Network Op's


Network Op's


System Engineering

"Sandbox"



Initiate Deployment



Help Desk Prototype

Training


Install Prototype

Begin Step 6

Install

Successful?

User Evaluation of

Prototype


of Prototype

Assessment of

Prototype

Approved

and Ready

to Field?

Yes

No

Yes

Return to

Step 5

No



Engage users for

Prototype Training


Prototype

Return to

Step 5


Prototype

Complete Help Desk

Training


the ATO


Plan

All Phases

Complete?

Provision Access to


plan

No

Conduct Post


(PIR)

PIR

Successful?

End SDDP

Yes

Return to


No

SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans




(WIP)

-Net-Worthiness

(Close)

-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Open)



-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Close)


Plan


SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



Update IMS with

Fielding Activities

Yes

Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

Testing


User Evaluation of

Prototype

Update DOT_LPF

Implementation Plan











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

PRM

BRM

SRM

DRM

TRM



SDDP Step 3


PURPOSE

Implement the components of the Materiel Solution.

OUTCOMES

■ Formation of team with wide range of skill sets.

■ Generation of detailed, program-level schedule for: implementation,

assignment of responsibilities, allocation of resources

■ Implementation of Materiel solution components.

■ Preparation of materiel solution components for testing.

Identify

DOTMLPF

Capability

Requirements

Define

DOTMLPF

Executable

Actions

Define Materiel

Solution and

Implementation

Plan

Plan / implement

developmental

components of

the Materiel

Solution

Sustain

Application

Lifecycle

Deploy/Operate

the Materiel

Solution


Fu

nctio

nal/ S

ME

Sponsor

Architecture T

eam

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

"Sandbox"

.




"Sandbox"



Identified

Top Level

Need

Start


Statement of

Need/Problem

Statement

Review and

Approve statement

of need/problem

statement and work

plan with Sponsor.





milestones and


requirements)

Gather known LRP

requirements


DOD Directives,


and OMB, GAO, BTA

Findings

Determine

Sub-Capability



Prioritization of



criteria

Verify Requirements

Satisfy

all relevant LRP

Constraints

Conduct Enterprise



Strategy

Determine potential


other enterprise

requirements

Sponsor

Approval?

Receive Needs Data

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Open)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (WIP)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Query 'As is'

Repository for

related LRP.


PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Complete

Sub-Capability


of PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(WIP)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)


Sub-Capabilities

Requirements?


measures and Key


section of PRM

Template

Identify existing

Key Performance


the Sub-Capability,

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Document :

Statement

of Need /

Problem

Statement


List: Laws,

Regulations,

Policies

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

NoEnterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?




GAO, BTA Findings


PRM Template

No

Yes

End 1.2



LRP.)

Begin 1.3

Decompose

Need/Problem

Statement into

Sub-Capabilities

Needs

PRM

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 1.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 2.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree N.

Query Architecture

to look for similar

Sub-Capabilities

End 1.3 Begin 1.4


identify the Key


Report:

Identified

attributes to

satisfy the

capability

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Determine

Sub-Capability

requirements


Complete

Sub-Capability

Requirement section

of PRM Template

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes





End 1.4

Begin 1.5

Engage the

Enterprise

Architecture Team

End 1.5

Begin 1.6

Submit

Capabilities

Requirements for

approval

Determine Initial

Scope with general

cost estimate


End 1.6

Review

Capability

Requirements

Corporate

Approval?

Yes

Report:

Performance

Requirements

for the

Capability

No

Yes

All Stop

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Document: Laws,

Regulations and

Policy constrains/

mandates with

findings for

relevance

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Report:

Sub-Capabilities

for the Need

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

All Stop









No

All Stop

Go to Step 2

Approved

Revise

DeniedApproved

Revise

Denied Approved

Denied

Proceed Previous


Revise

Proceed to


No

No

Fu

nctio

nal/

SM

ES

ponsor

Process T

eam

Architectu

re T

eam








Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Process Team

"Sandbox"


PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Start

SDDP 2.0

Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis



may be affected by


processes have been


addressed



Ensure processes



Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis

Capture DOTMLPF

interdependencies



processes




of these processes




enterprise level

Develop


formal review

and approval to

proceed


BPR

Package BPR


Register content

in Business

Reference Model

Process

Engineering

Content

Approved?

Yes

BRM








(Open)

BRM







-BPR Assertion




process step





steps




BPR

Assertion

Complete?

Yes

Revise



Define ROI and


Build work plans

Generate BCA

Ensure All expected


address/satisfied

Define Mission


DOTMLPF Capability

Requirements

High Level

Process

describing

expected

outcomes

Work plan

approved?



required

Approved

Revise



Team (I.E "Yellow







No

Characterize the

DOTMLPF execution



and be successful

Execution

Requirements

Approved?

Approved

Begin End

Process

Engineering

DOTMLPF

Implementation

Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

BRM








Process

Information

from SME


to Deliver DOTMLPF


All Stop

Denied

Proceed to Process


No

Proceed to Step 3

All Stop

Denied

All Stop

Denied

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

YesCorporate

Approval?

Yes

Approved

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

No

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)


Process Engineering

Activities

BRM








(Open)

Work Plan

SDDP 1 & 2

- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones

(from Step 1)

Revise

Functional/S

ME

Spon

sor

Syste

m E

ngin

eering

/ D

esig

n

Arc

hitectu

re T

eam

CO

I/E

VT

Govern

ance

Pro

ject Lead / P

roduct

Cente

rP

latform

En

gin

eering

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor


COI / EVT

Governance




Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance


Governance

Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance




"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Onboarding






Center

Go to SDDP Step 4

BRM from

Step 2

Begin Finish

Lift information

puts/gets for each

process model





put/get within the

process


flow necessary to


from the process





to meet the process





implementation






Contextual Model

Approve

Review Package

and Select

COA?



Web Service Code /



Model

All Stop

Revise

Denied

Begin 3.0

Start

Material

Solution

Design

Review

and Approve,

Contextual Model

and Work

Plan

All Stop

Approved

Denied


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)















Revise

Contextual Model





Architecture

Support?

No


of solution options

Yes



Web Service Code /



Model

Auditable

Process

model 1

Auditable

Process

model 2

Auditable

Process

model N

Contextual

model for

Process 1

Contextual

model for

Process 2

Contextual

model for

Process N



- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones




COA to DOTLPF


material solution

Additional

Process

Flows?

Yes

SME

Validation of

Contextual

Model?

Architecture

Support?

No

Yes





Approve

Bounded User

Requirements?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

All Stop

Approved?

SWG review of

Governance

Package

IRB review of

Governance

Package

Greater than

$1M

Approved Yes

Denied

Validate

Contextual Model

content



each COA

DBSMC review of

Governance

Package

No

No


contextual model

Yes

Update DOTMLPF

Implementation plan

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Assemble

Governance

package

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Approved?

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

All Stop

Denied







-SLAs (Open)


CMO review of

Governance

Package

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Derive additional

infrastructure

service necessary

to support COA

Update

Implementation

Plan

Approved

Derive mission


requirements

Conduct

infrastructure

topology analysis

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (WIP)















-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Conduct Cost

Estimates for each

COA

SRM























Create Draft



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














SRM























SRM
























exchanges / assets









requirement.

Charter Approved

by SWG?

Approve COI

vocabulary

package

Identify

authoritative

and source data

from a process

perspective

Identify ADS

Determine access

rules ,roles and



Stand Up

COI

Develop Draft

Ontology

Stand Down

COI

Proceed to


No

SWG Approval

COI Vocabulary

package

Yes

Generate

Vocabulary

Package

Proceed to


No

SRM























SRM























DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)






-Ontology (Open)


DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)




(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


DRM





(WIP)



-Ontology (WIP)


Yes


wants to use each

put/get (ex.


LRP Compliance



-PIA (Open)

-FISMA (Open)

-NDAA (Open)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Open)





checklist

Identify evidence

that can satisfy

compliance

requirements

LRP Compliance



-PIA (Close)

-FISMA (Close)

-NDAA (Close)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Close)



Contextual Model

Provide to Sponsor

recommended


COAs to satisfy the

Contextual Model














-Resourcing (WIP)











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Based on the COA




-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)


















requirements

DRM





Mapping (Close)



-Ontology (Close)





Exposure Services

Initiate COI

Coordination


SWG


No



development

Draft a new COI

charter or revise


Approved and

COA Selected






DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)


(Open)



(ADS) Mapping (WIP)


(WIP)


(WIP)

-Ontology (WIP)


Sponsor

Champions

ADS

Yes

Identify additional

information

exchanges requiring

new implementation




Sponsor

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

Yes

Corporate

Approval?

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

Yes

No

SRM























SRM





































-Resourcing (WIP)

Determine

Distributing

Computing

requirements

Develop service


Develop Service

Levels

Agreements

(SLA's) for each

layer of service

Review Legacy

System

Requirements







-SLAs (Close)


Provide Sponsor

Cost Estimate

Updates


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)


-COAs (Close)














Update cost

estimates to M-

Implementation

Plan

BRM (From Step 2)








(Close)

BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)

-Auditable Process

(Close)



Information Assets

(Close)


-BPR Assertion


COI Panel Review



Sponsor

Ensure ontology

reuse

Information

Exchange

Reuse?

No

Extract Reusable



DRMs

Yes

DRM

-COI Charter (Open)






-Ontology (WIP)















-Resourcing (WIP)

Define Platform

Compliance

Requirements

Identify Business /

War Fighter

Enterpise

Architecture

Compliance

Requirements

Search the

Enterpise

Architecture to

identify additional

compliance

requirements

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


SRM























Proceed to COA

Evaluation Decision

Revise

Match Compliance

Requirements to


exchanges, services

and function

Operational

Baseline

Target CEIT

Baseline

Fu

nct

ion

al/S

ME

Sp

on

sor

Sys

tem

En

gin

ee

rin

gP

roje

ct L

ea

d /

Pro

du

ct C

en

ter

Arc

hite

ctu

re

Pla

tfo

rm

En

gin

ee

rin

gT

est

ing

ITL

CA

Q A

uth

ori

tyC

on

tra

ctin

gF

ina

nce

A

sso

cia

ted

P

EO

/PM

OG

ove

rna

nce

(C

&A

)

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


Sponsor

System Engineering


Architecture

Testing


ITLC

AQ Authority

Finance

PEO/PMO

Governance (C&A)

Acquire Capability

"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Participate in

Kickoff Session


Begin Step 4

Review Bounded

User Requirements

(Acquisition

Strategy Package)

Identify Kickoff

meeting attendees

Call Kickoff

Meeting

Facilitate Kickoff

Meeting











Participate in

Kickoff Session

Approve

IMS


Activities


Activities

Task POCs to

execute IMS


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities

Yes


No


Activities


Activities

Proceed to Step 5

Participate in

Kickoff Session














Complete IMS

Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Complete notional

Development

Schedule











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Draft IMS (Open)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Review Notional

Development

Schedule and Kick

off meeting

attendees

Validate IMS to M-

Implementation Plan



Develop Code

Configure COTS/GOTS


GOTS/Web Services

Update "M" - DOTLPF



SOW/Task

Order

-Developer

Guidance


Plan (From Step 3)

Draft Test Plan

Implementation

Baseline


Environment

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Initiate Government

Acceptance

Source code review


-Target Baseline

-Function Correct







-Unit Test Results

Engage SME for User

Quick Look

Perform User Quick

Look

Discuss Government

Acceptance and


All Stop

Next

Steps

All Stop


order

Validate Developer

Testing

Government

Accept?

(w/ Sponsor)


-Code compiles





Government Accepted


-Source Code (WIP)











for ITLC to fix

ITLC to Fix


-Source Code (WIP)










Proceed to Step 3 -


Proceed to Step 3


Contracting

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


tiona

l/SM

ESp

onso

rIT

LCSy

stem

Eng

inee

ring

Arch

itect

ure

Test

ing

Plat

form

Eng

inee

ring

Netw

ork

Op's

Proj

ect L

ead

/ Pro

duct

Cen

ter

Gov

erna

nce

(C&

A)

System Engineering

Perform Integration


Testing

Architecture

ITLC


Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME



Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Architecture

Testing


Network Ops


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


environment

Verify Rebuild

(Spot Check)

Pass?

Fix & Update Code

package


& Testing


Functionality

User

Evaluation &

Integration

Successful?



Project Leader and


Fix & Update Code

package


Yes

Conduct


Begin Step 5


Evaluation


evaluation


Procedures


Environment


Analyze Test

Report


Independent Testing

Successful?

Success



Continue?




SRM





















Participate in User

Evaluation


Documentation

Update C&A

information


Environment


For Tier 1


Measures & Metrics


Development


Development

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed___________


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Yes

DRM







-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT_________________






Deployment Package












Update IMS with


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Deployment Package














Deployment Package















DRM






-Ontology (Close)


__________AS BUILT_______




No

Perform Test

Procedure Dry Run

All Stop

All Stop

Deployment Package


Deployment Package




Determine Return

Point

Continue?


All Stop

All Stop


Major Change

SRM























_________________AS Deployed____________

_


Repository (Close)




Update the


Proceed to Step 6

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT____________




Network Ops

System Engineering

Sponsor

Functional / SME


For Tier 2


For Tier 3

Initiate Helpdesk


BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)






-BPR Assertion


Implementation

Baseline

Minor Correction

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed_____________



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)


-COAs (Close)














-SRM

-DRM


Components


infrastructure


external interfaces









































Minor Change

No






















Evaluation Criteria

-C&A Complete


-Testing Successful

-DOT_LPF Readiness


ITLC Fix

No Yes



Wait on DOT_LPF


Implementation Plan



-Work plans

-BCA
















Func

tiona

l/SME

Spon

sor

ITLC

Arch

itectu

re

Testi

ngPl

atfor

m En

ginee

ring

Netw

ork O

p'sPr

oject

Lead

/ Pro

duct

Cente

r











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

System Engineering

Testing


Network Op's


Network Op's


System Engineering

"Sandbox"



Initiate Deployment



Help Desk Prototype

Training


Install Prototype

Begin Step 6

Install

Successful?

User Evaluation of

Prototype


of Prototype

Assessment of

Prototype

Approved

and Ready

to Field?

Yes

No

Yes

Return to

Step 5

No



Engage users for

Prototype Training


Prototype

Return to

Step 5


Prototype

Complete Help Desk

Training


the ATO


Plan

All Phases

Complete?

Provision Access to


plan

No

Conduct Post


(PIR)

PIR

Successful?

End SDDP

Yes

Return to


No

SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans




(WIP)

-Net-Worthiness

(Close)

-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Open)



-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Close)


Plan


SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



Update IMS with

Fielding Activities

Yes

Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

Testing


User Evaluation of

Prototype

Update DOT_LPF

Implementation Plan











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

PRM

BRM

SRM

DRM

TRM

Developed against

configuration managed

technical standards

SDDP Step 4


PURPOSE

Prepare the components of the Materiel Solution for deployment

across the Air Force Platform Environment.

OUTCOMES

■ Successfully tested components of the materiel solution that

demonstrate networthiness, functionality, and satisfy performance

measures.

■ Platform Environment prepared to accept and manage the

components throughout the lifecycle of the materiel solution,

including sustainment functions such as monitoring and Help

Desk support.

Identify

DOTMLPF

Capability

Requirements

Define

DOTMLPF

Executable

Actions

Define Materiel

Solution and

Implementation

Plan

Plan / implement

developmental

components of

the Materiel

Solution

Sustain

Application

Lifecycle

Deploy/Operate

the Materiel

Solution


Fu

nctio

nal/ S

ME

Sponsor

Architecture T

eam

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

"Sandbox"

.




"Sandbox"



Identified

Top Level

Need

Start


Statement of

Need/Problem

Statement

Review and

Approve statement

of need/problem

statement and work

plan with Sponsor.





milestones and


requirements)

Gather known LRP

requirements


DOD Directives,


and OMB, GAO, BTA

Findings

Determine

Sub-Capability



Prioritization of



criteria

Verify Requirements

Satisfy

all relevant LRP

Constraints

Conduct Enterprise



Strategy

Determine potential


other enterprise

requirements

Sponsor

Approval?

Receive Needs Data

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Open)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (WIP)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Query 'As is'

Repository for

related LRP.


PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Complete

Sub-Capability


of PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(WIP)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)


Sub-Capabilities

Requirements?


measures and Key


section of PRM

Template

Identify existing

Key Performance


the Sub-Capability,

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Document :

Statement

of Need /

Problem

Statement


List: Laws,

Regulations,

Policies

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

NoEnterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?




GAO, BTA Findings


PRM Template

No

Yes

End 1.2



LRP.)

Begin 1.3

Decompose

Need/Problem

Statement into

Sub-Capabilities

Needs

PRM

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 1.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 2.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree N.

Query Architecture

to look for similar

Sub-Capabilities

End 1.3 Begin 1.4


identify the Key


Report:

Identified

attributes to

satisfy the

capability

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Determine

Sub-Capability

requirements


Complete

Sub-Capability

Requirement section

of PRM Template

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes





End 1.4

Begin 1.5

Engage the

Enterprise

Architecture Team

End 1.5

Begin 1.6

Submit

Capabilities

Requirements for

approval

Determine Initial

Scope with general

cost estimate


End 1.6

Review

Capability

Requirements

Corporate

Approval?

Yes

Report:

Performance

Requirements

for the

Capability

No

Yes

All Stop

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Document: Laws,

Regulations and

Policy constrains/

mandates with

findings for

relevance

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Report:

Sub-Capabilities

for the Need

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

All Stop









No

All Stop

Go to Step 2

Approved

Revise

DeniedApproved

Revise

Denied Approved

Denied

Proceed Previous


Revise

Proceed to


No

No

Fu

nctio

nal/

SM

ES

ponsor

Process T

eam

Architectu

re T

eam








Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Process Team

"Sandbox"


PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Start

SDDP 2.0

Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis



may be affected by


processes have been


addressed



Ensure processes



Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis

Capture DOTMLPF

interdependencies



processes




of these processes




enterprise level

Develop


formal review

and approval to

proceed


BPR

Package BPR


Register content

in Business

Reference Model

Process

Engineering

Content

Approved?

Yes

BRM








(Open)

BRM







-BPR Assertion




process step





steps




BPR

Assertion

Complete?

Yes

Revise



Define ROI and


Build work plans

Generate BCA

Ensure All expected


address/satisfied

Define Mission


DOTMLPF Capability

Requirements

High Level

Process

describing

expected

outcomes

Work plan

approved?



required

Approved

Revise



Team (I.E "Yellow







No

Characterize the

DOTMLPF execution



and be successful

Execution

Requirements

Approved?

Approved

Begin End

Process

Engineering

DOTMLPF

Implementation

Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

BRM








Process

Information

from SME


to Deliver DOTMLPF


All Stop

Denied

Proceed to Process


No

Proceed to Step 3

All Stop

Denied

All Stop

Denied

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

YesCorporate

Approval?

Yes

Approved

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

No

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)


Process Engineering

Activities

BRM








(Open)

Work Plan

SDDP 1 & 2

- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones

(from Step 1)

Revise

Functional/S

ME

Spon

sor

Syste

m E

ngin

eering

/ D

esig

n

Arc

hitectu

re T

eam

CO

I/E

VT

Govern

ance

Pro

ject Lead / P

roduct

Cente

rP

latform

En

gin

eering

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor


COI / EVT

Governance




Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance


Governance

Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance




"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Onboarding






Center

Go to SDDP Step 4

BRM from

Step 2

Begin Finish

Lift information

puts/gets for each

process model





put/get within the

process


flow necessary to


from the process





to meet the process





implementation






Contextual Model

Approve

Review Package

and Select

COA?



Web Service Code /



Model

All Stop

Revise

Denied

Begin 3.0

Start

Material

Solution

Design

Review

and Approve,

Contextual Model

and Work

Plan

All Stop

Approved

Denied


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)















Revise

Contextual Model





Architecture

Support?

No


of solution options

Yes



Web Service Code /



Model

Auditable

Process

model 1

Auditable

Process

model 2

Auditable

Process

model N

Contextual

model for

Process 1

Contextual

model for

Process 2

Contextual

model for

Process N



- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones




COA to DOTLPF


material solution

Additional

Process

Flows?

Yes

SME

Validation of

Contextual

Model?

Architecture

Support?

No

Yes





Approve

Bounded User

Requirements?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

All Stop

Approved?

SWG review of

Governance

Package

IRB review of

Governance

Package

Greater than

$1M

Approved Yes

Denied

Validate

Contextual Model

content



each COA

DBSMC review of

Governance

Package

No

No


contextual model

Yes

Update DOTMLPF

Implementation plan

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Assemble

Governance

package

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Approved?

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

All Stop

Denied







-SLAs (Open)


CMO review of

Governance

Package

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Derive additional

infrastructure

service necessary

to support COA

Update

Implementation

Plan

Approved

Derive mission


requirements

Conduct

infrastructure

topology analysis

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (WIP)















-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Conduct Cost

Estimates for each

COA

SRM























Create Draft



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














SRM























SRM
























exchanges / assets









requirement.

Charter Approved

by SWG?

Approve COI

vocabulary

package

Identify

authoritative

and source data

from a process

perspective

Identify ADS

Determine access

rules ,roles and



Stand Up

COI

Develop Draft

Ontology

Stand Down

COI

Proceed to


No

SWG Approval

COI Vocabulary

package

Yes

Generate

Vocabulary

Package

Proceed to


No

SRM























SRM























DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)






-Ontology (Open)


DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)




(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


DRM





(WIP)



-Ontology (WIP)


Yes


wants to use each

put/get (ex.


LRP Compliance



-PIA (Open)

-FISMA (Open)

-NDAA (Open)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Open)





checklist

Identify evidence

that can satisfy

compliance

requirements

LRP Compliance



-PIA (Close)

-FISMA (Close)

-NDAA (Close)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Close)



Contextual Model

Provide to Sponsor

recommended


COAs to satisfy the

Contextual Model














-Resourcing (WIP)











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Based on the COA




-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)


















requirements

DRM





Mapping (Close)



-Ontology (Close)





Exposure Services

Initiate COI

Coordination


SWG


No



development

Draft a new COI

charter or revise


Approved and

COA Selected






DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)


(Open)



(ADS) Mapping (WIP)


(WIP)


(WIP)

-Ontology (WIP)


Sponsor

Champions

ADS

Yes

Identify additional

information

exchanges requiring

new implementation




Sponsor

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

Yes

Corporate

Approval?

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

Yes

No

SRM























SRM





































-Resourcing (WIP)

Determine

Distributing

Computing

requirements

Develop service


Develop Service

Levels

Agreements

(SLA's) for each

layer of service

Review Legacy

System

Requirements







-SLAs (Close)


Provide Sponsor

Cost Estimate

Updates


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)


-COAs (Close)














Update cost

estimates to M-

Implementation

Plan

BRM (From Step 2)








(Close)

BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)

-Auditable Process

(Close)



Information Assets

(Close)


-BPR Assertion


COI Panel Review



Sponsor

Ensure ontology

reuse

Information

Exchange

Reuse?

No

Extract Reusable



DRMs

Yes

DRM

-COI Charter (Open)






-Ontology (WIP)















-Resourcing (WIP)

Define Platform

Compliance

Requirements

Identify Business /

War Fighter

Enterpise

Architecture

Compliance

Requirements

Search the

Enterpise

Architecture to

identify additional

compliance

requirements

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


SRM























Proceed to COA

Evaluation Decision

Revise

Match Compliance

Requirements to


exchanges, services

and function

Operational

Baseline

Target CEIT

Baseline

Fu

nct

ion

al/S

ME

Sp

on

sor

Sys

tem

En

gin

ee

rin

gP

roje

ct L

ea

d /

Pro

du

ct C

en

ter

Arc

hite

ctu

re

Pla

tfo

rm

En

gin

ee

rin

gT

est

ing

ITL

CA

Q A

uth

ori

tyC

on

tra

ctin

gF

ina

nce

A

sso

cia

ted

P

EO

/PM

OG

ove

rna

nce

(C

&A

)

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


Sponsor

System Engineering


Architecture

Testing


ITLC

AQ Authority

Finance

PEO/PMO

Governance (C&A)

Acquire Capability

"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Participate in

Kickoff Session


Begin Step 4

Review Bounded

User Requirements

(Acquisition

Strategy Package)

Identify Kickoff

meeting attendees

Call Kickoff

Meeting

Facilitate Kickoff

Meeting











Participate in

Kickoff Session

Approve

IMS


Activities


Activities

Task POCs to

execute IMS


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities

Yes


No


Activities


Activities

Proceed to Step 5

Participate in

Kickoff Session














Complete IMS

Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Complete notional

Development

Schedule











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Draft IMS (Open)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Review Notional

Development

Schedule and Kick

off meeting

attendees

Validate IMS to M-

Implementation Plan



Develop Code

Configure COTS/GOTS


GOTS/Web Services

Update "M" - DOTLPF



SOW/Task

Order

-Developer

Guidance


Plan (From Step 3)

Draft Test Plan

Implementation

Baseline


Environment

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Initiate Government

Acceptance

Source code review


-Target Baseline

-Function Correct







-Unit Test Results

Engage SME for User

Quick Look

Perform User Quick

Look

Discuss Government

Acceptance and


All Stop

Next

Steps

All Stop


order

Validate Developer

Testing

Government

Accept?

(w/ Sponsor)


-Code compiles





Government Accepted


-Source Code (WIP)











for ITLC to fix

ITLC to Fix


-Source Code (WIP)










Proceed to Step 3 -


Proceed to Step 3


Contracting

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


tiona

l/SM

ESp

onso

rIT

LCSy

stem

Eng

inee

ring

Arch

itect

ure

Test

ing

Plat

form

Eng

inee

ring

Netw

ork

Op's

Proj

ect L

ead

/ Pro

duct

Cen

ter

Gov

erna

nce

(C&

A)

System Engineering

Perform Integration


Testing

Architecture

ITLC


Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME



Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Architecture

Testing


Network Ops


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


environment

Verify Rebuild

(Spot Check)

Pass?

Fix & Update Code

package


& Testing


Functionality

User

Evaluation &

Integration

Successful?



Project Leader and


Fix & Update Code

package


Yes

Conduct


Begin Step 5


Evaluation


evaluation


Procedures


Environment


Analyze Test

Report


Independent Testing

Successful?

Success



Continue?




SRM





















Participate in User

Evaluation


Documentation

Update C&A

information


Environment


For Tier 1


Measures & Metrics


Development


Development

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed___________


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Yes

DRM







-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT_________________






Deployment Package












Update IMS with


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Deployment Package














Deployment Package















DRM






-Ontology (Close)


__________AS BUILT_______




No

Perform Test

Procedure Dry Run

All Stop

All Stop

Deployment Package


Deployment Package




Determine Return

Point

Continue?


All Stop

All Stop


Major Change

SRM























_________________AS Deployed____________

_


Repository (Close)




Update the


Proceed to Step 6

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT____________




Network Ops

System Engineering

Sponsor

Functional / SME


For Tier 2


For Tier 3

Initiate Helpdesk


BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)






-BPR Assertion


Implementation

Baseline

Minor Correction

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed_____________



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)


-COAs (Close)














-SRM

-DRM


Components


infrastructure


external interfaces









































Minor Change

No






















Evaluation Criteria

-C&A Complete


-Testing Successful

-DOT_LPF Readiness


ITLC Fix

No Yes



Wait on DOT_LPF


Implementation Plan



-Work plans

-BCA
















Func

tiona

l/SME

Spon

sor

ITLC

Arch

itectu

re

Testi

ngPl

atfor

m En

ginee

ring

Netw

ork O

p'sPr

oject

Lead

/ Pro

duct

Cente

r











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

System Engineering

Testing


Network Op's


Network Op's


System Engineering

"Sandbox"



Initiate Deployment



Help Desk Prototype

Training


Install Prototype

Begin Step 6

Install

Successful?

User Evaluation of

Prototype


of Prototype

Assessment of

Prototype

Approved

and Ready

to Field?

Yes

No

Yes

Return to

Step 5

No



Engage users for

Prototype Training


Prototype

Return to

Step 5


Prototype

Complete Help Desk

Training


the ATO


Plan

All Phases

Complete?

Provision Access to


plan

No

Conduct Post


(PIR)

PIR

Successful?

End SDDP

Yes

Return to


No

SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans




(WIP)

-Net-Worthiness

(Close)

-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Open)



-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Close)


Plan


SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



Update IMS with

Fielding Activities

Yes

Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

Testing


User Evaluation of

Prototype

Update DOT_LPF

Implementation Plan











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

PRM

BRM

SRM

DRM

TRM

Tested / accredited to

configuration managed

technical standards

SDDP Step 5

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 33 33

PURPOSE

Deploy the Materiel Solution and deliver capabilities that solve the

user’s problem and satisfy the user’s needs.

OUTCOMES

■ Fully operational materiel solution that meets the user’s needs

and achieves the performance measures

■ Platform environment prepared to operate and sustain the

materiel solution for the duration of the useful life of the materiel

solution.

Identify

DOTMLPF

Capability

Requirements

Define

DOTMLPF

Executable

Actions

Define Materiel

Solution and

Implementation

Plan

Plan / implement

developmental

components of

the Materiel

Solution

Sustain

Application

Lifecycle

Deploy/Operate

the Materiel

Solution


Fu

nctio

nal/ S

ME

Sponsor

Architecture T

eam

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

"Sandbox"

.




"Sandbox"



Identified

Top Level

Need

Start


Statement of

Need/Problem

Statement

Review and

Approve statement

of need/problem

statement and work

plan with Sponsor.





milestones and


requirements)

Gather known LRP

requirements


DOD Directives,


and OMB, GAO, BTA

Findings

Determine

Sub-Capability



Prioritization of



criteria

Verify Requirements

Satisfy

all relevant LRP

Constraints

Conduct Enterprise



Strategy

Determine potential


other enterprise

requirements

Sponsor

Approval?

Receive Needs Data

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Open)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (WIP)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Query 'As is'

Repository for

related LRP.


PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Complete

Sub-Capability


of PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(WIP)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)


Sub-Capabilities

Requirements?


measures and Key


section of PRM

Template

Identify existing

Key Performance


the Sub-Capability,

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Document :

Statement

of Need /

Problem

Statement


List: Laws,

Regulations,

Policies

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

NoEnterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?




GAO, BTA Findings


PRM Template

No

Yes

End 1.2



LRP.)

Begin 1.3

Decompose

Need/Problem

Statement into

Sub-Capabilities

Needs

PRM

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 1.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 2.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree N.

Query Architecture

to look for similar

Sub-Capabilities

End 1.3 Begin 1.4


identify the Key


Report:

Identified

attributes to

satisfy the

capability

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Determine

Sub-Capability

requirements


Complete

Sub-Capability

Requirement section

of PRM Template

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes





End 1.4

Begin 1.5

Engage the

Enterprise

Architecture Team

End 1.5

Begin 1.6

Submit

Capabilities

Requirements for

approval

Determine Initial

Scope with general

cost estimate


End 1.6

Review

Capability

Requirements

Corporate

Approval?

Yes

Report:

Performance

Requirements

for the

Capability

No

Yes

All Stop

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Document: Laws,

Regulations and

Policy constrains/

mandates with

findings for

relevance

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Report:

Sub-Capabilities

for the Need

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

All Stop









No

All Stop

Go to Step 2

Approved

Revise

DeniedApproved

Revise

Denied Approved

Denied

Proceed Previous


Revise

Proceed to


No

No

Fu

nctio

nal/

SM

ES

ponsor

Process T

eam

Architectu

re T

eam








Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Process Team

"Sandbox"


PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Start

SDDP 2.0

Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis



may be affected by


processes have been


addressed



Ensure processes



Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis

Capture DOTMLPF

interdependencies



processes




of these processes




enterprise level

Develop


formal review

and approval to

proceed


BPR

Package BPR


Register content

in Business

Reference Model

Process

Engineering

Content

Approved?

Yes

BRM








(Open)

BRM







-BPR Assertion




process step





steps




BPR

Assertion

Complete?

Yes

Revise



Define ROI and


Build work plans

Generate BCA

Ensure All expected


address/satisfied

Define Mission


DOTMLPF Capability

Requirements

High Level

Process

describing

expected

outcomes

Work plan

approved?



required

Approved

Revise



Team (I.E "Yellow







No

Characterize the

DOTMLPF execution



and be successful

Execution

Requirements

Approved?

Approved

Begin End

Process

Engineering

DOTMLPF

Implementation

Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

BRM








Process

Information

from SME


to Deliver DOTMLPF


All Stop

Denied

Proceed to Process


No

Proceed to Step 3

All Stop

Denied

All Stop

Denied

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

YesCorporate

Approval?

Yes

Approved

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

No

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)


Process Engineering

Activities

BRM








(Open)

Work Plan

SDDP 1 & 2

- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones

(from Step 1)

Revise

Functional/S

ME

Spon

sor

Syste

m E

ngin

eering

/ D

esig

n

Arc

hitectu

re T

eam

CO

I/E

VT

Govern

ance

Pro

ject Lead / P

roduct

Cente

rP

latform

En

gin

eering

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor


COI / EVT

Governance




Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance


Governance

Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance




"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Onboarding






Center

Go to SDDP Step 4

BRM from

Step 2

Begin Finish

Lift information

puts/gets for each

process model





put/get within the

process


flow necessary to


from the process





to meet the process





implementation






Contextual Model

Approve

Review Package

and Select

COA?



Web Service Code /



Model

All Stop

Revise

Denied

Begin 3.0

Start

Material

Solution

Design

Review

and Approve,

Contextual Model

and Work

Plan

All Stop

Approved

Denied


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)















Revise

Contextual Model





Architecture

Support?

No


of solution options

Yes



Web Service Code /



Model

Auditable

Process

model 1

Auditable

Process

model 2

Auditable

Process

model N

Contextual

model for

Process 1

Contextual

model for

Process 2

Contextual

model for

Process N



- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones




COA to DOTLPF


material solution

Additional

Process

Flows?

Yes

SME

Validation of

Contextual

Model?

Architecture

Support?

No

Yes





Approve

Bounded User

Requirements?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

All Stop

Approved?

SWG review of

Governance

Package

IRB review of

Governance

Package

Greater than

$1M

Approved Yes

Denied

Validate

Contextual Model

content



each COA

DBSMC review of

Governance

Package

No

No


contextual model

Yes

Update DOTMLPF

Implementation plan

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Assemble

Governance

package

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Approved?

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

All Stop

Denied







-SLAs (Open)


CMO review of

Governance

Package

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Derive additional

infrastructure

service necessary

to support COA

Update

Implementation

Plan

Approved

Derive mission


requirements

Conduct

infrastructure

topology analysis

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (WIP)















-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Conduct Cost

Estimates for each

COA

SRM























Create Draft



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














SRM























SRM
























exchanges / assets









requirement.

Charter Approved

by SWG?

Approve COI

vocabulary

package

Identify

authoritative

and source data

from a process

perspective

Identify ADS

Determine access

rules ,roles and



Stand Up

COI

Develop Draft

Ontology

Stand Down

COI

Proceed to


No

SWG Approval

COI Vocabulary

package

Yes

Generate

Vocabulary

Package

Proceed to


No

SRM























SRM























DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)






-Ontology (Open)


DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)




(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


DRM





(WIP)



-Ontology (WIP)


Yes


wants to use each

put/get (ex.


LRP Compliance



-PIA (Open)

-FISMA (Open)

-NDAA (Open)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Open)





checklist

Identify evidence

that can satisfy

compliance

requirements

LRP Compliance



-PIA (Close)

-FISMA (Close)

-NDAA (Close)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Close)



Contextual Model

Provide to Sponsor

recommended


COAs to satisfy the

Contextual Model














-Resourcing (WIP)











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Based on the COA




-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)


















requirements

DRM





Mapping (Close)



-Ontology (Close)





Exposure Services

Initiate COI

Coordination


SWG


No



development

Draft a new COI

charter or revise


Approved and

COA Selected






DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)


(Open)



(ADS) Mapping (WIP)


(WIP)


(WIP)

-Ontology (WIP)


Sponsor

Champions

ADS

Yes

Identify additional

information

exchanges requiring

new implementation




Sponsor

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

Yes

Corporate

Approval?

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

Yes

No

SRM























SRM





































-Resourcing (WIP)

Determine

Distributing

Computing

requirements

Develop service


Develop Service

Levels

Agreements

(SLA's) for each

layer of service

Review Legacy

System

Requirements







-SLAs (Close)


Provide Sponsor

Cost Estimate

Updates


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)


-COAs (Close)














Update cost

estimates to M-

Implementation

Plan

BRM (From Step 2)








(Close)

BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)

-Auditable Process

(Close)



Information Assets

(Close)


-BPR Assertion


COI Panel Review



Sponsor

Ensure ontology

reuse

Information

Exchange

Reuse?

No

Extract Reusable



DRMs

Yes

DRM

-COI Charter (Open)






-Ontology (WIP)















-Resourcing (WIP)

Define Platform

Compliance

Requirements

Identify Business /

War Fighter

Enterpise

Architecture

Compliance

Requirements

Search the

Enterpise

Architecture to

identify additional

compliance

requirements

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


SRM























Proceed to COA

Evaluation Decision

Revise

Match Compliance

Requirements to


exchanges, services

and function

Operational

Baseline

Target CEIT

Baseline

Fu

nct

ion

al/S

ME

Sp

on

sor

Sys

tem

En

gin

ee

rin

gP

roje

ct L

ea

d /

Pro

du

ct C

en

ter

Arc

hite

ctu

re

Pla

tfo

rm

En

gin

ee

rin

gT

est

ing

ITL

CA

Q A

uth

ori

tyC

on

tra

ctin

gF

ina

nce

A

sso

cia

ted

P

EO

/PM

OG

ove

rna

nce

(C

&A

)

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


Sponsor

System Engineering


Architecture

Testing


ITLC

AQ Authority

Finance

PEO/PMO

Governance (C&A)

Acquire Capability

"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Participate in

Kickoff Session


Begin Step 4

Review Bounded

User Requirements

(Acquisition

Strategy Package)

Identify Kickoff

meeting attendees

Call Kickoff

Meeting

Facilitate Kickoff

Meeting











Participate in

Kickoff Session

Approve

IMS


Activities


Activities

Task POCs to

execute IMS


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities

Yes


No


Activities


Activities

Proceed to Step 5

Participate in

Kickoff Session














Complete IMS

Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Complete notional

Development

Schedule











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Draft IMS (Open)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Review Notional

Development

Schedule and Kick

off meeting

attendees

Validate IMS to M-

Implementation Plan



Develop Code

Configure COTS/GOTS


GOTS/Web Services

Update "M" - DOTLPF



SOW/Task

Order

-Developer

Guidance


Plan (From Step 3)

Draft Test Plan

Implementation

Baseline


Environment

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Initiate Government

Acceptance

Source code review


-Target Baseline

-Function Correct







-Unit Test Results

Engage SME for User

Quick Look

Perform User Quick

Look

Discuss Government

Acceptance and


All Stop

Next

Steps

All Stop


order

Validate Developer

Testing

Government

Accept?

(w/ Sponsor)


-Code compiles





Government Accepted


-Source Code (WIP)











for ITLC to fix

ITLC to Fix


-Source Code (WIP)










Proceed to Step 3 -


Proceed to Step 3


Contracting

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


tiona

l/SM

ESp

onso

rIT

LCSy

stem

Eng

inee

ring

Arch

itect

ure

Test

ing

Plat

form

Eng

inee

ring

Netw

ork

Op's

Proj

ect L

ead

/ Pro

duct

Cen

ter

Gov

erna

nce

(C&

A)

System Engineering

Perform Integration


Testing

Architecture

ITLC


Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME



Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Architecture

Testing


Network Ops


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


environment

Verify Rebuild

(Spot Check)

Pass?

Fix & Update Code

package


& Testing


Functionality

User

Evaluation &

Integration

Successful?



Project Leader and


Fix & Update Code

package


Yes

Conduct


Begin Step 5


Evaluation


evaluation


Procedures


Environment


Analyze Test

Report


Independent Testing

Successful?

Success



Continue?




SRM





















Participate in User

Evaluation


Documentation

Update C&A

information


Environment


For Tier 1


Measures & Metrics


Development


Development

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed___________


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Yes

DRM







-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT_________________






Deployment Package












Update IMS with


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Deployment Package














Deployment Package















DRM






-Ontology (Close)


__________AS BUILT_______




No

Perform Test

Procedure Dry Run

All Stop

All Stop

Deployment Package


Deployment Package




Determine Return

Point

Continue?


All Stop

All Stop


Major Change

SRM























_________________AS Deployed____________

_


Repository (Close)




Update the


Proceed to Step 6

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT____________




Network Ops

System Engineering

Sponsor

Functional / SME


For Tier 2


For Tier 3

Initiate Helpdesk


BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)






-BPR Assertion


Implementation

Baseline

Minor Correction

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed_____________



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)


-COAs (Close)














-SRM

-DRM


Components


infrastructure


external interfaces









































Minor Change

No






















Evaluation Criteria

-C&A Complete


-Testing Successful

-DOT_LPF Readiness


ITLC Fix

No Yes



Wait on DOT_LPF


Implementation Plan



-Work plans

-BCA
















Func

tiona

l/SME

Spon

sor

ITLC

Arch

itectu

re

Testi

ngPl

atfor

m En

ginee

ring

Netw

ork O

p'sPr

oject

Lead

/ Pro

duct

Cente

r











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

System Engineering

Testing


Network Op's


Network Op's


System Engineering

"Sandbox"



Initiate Deployment



Help Desk Prototype

Training


Install Prototype

Begin Step 6

Install

Successful?

User Evaluation of

Prototype


of Prototype

Assessment of

Prototype

Approved

and Ready

to Field?

Yes

No

Yes

Return to

Step 5

No



Engage users for

Prototype Training


Prototype

Return to

Step 5


Prototype

Complete Help Desk

Training


the ATO


Plan

All Phases

Complete?

Provision Access to


plan

No

Conduct Post


(PIR)

PIR

Successful?

End SDDP

Yes

Return to


No

SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans




(WIP)

-Net-Worthiness

(Close)

-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Open)



-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Close)


Plan


SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



Update IMS with

Fielding Activities

Yes

Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

Testing


User Evaluation of

Prototype

Update DOT_LPF

Implementation Plan











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

PRM

BRM

SRM

DRM

TRM

Deployed to platform

configured to technical

standards

SDDP Step 6


SDDP Delivery Process LTD

Deploy Full

Deploy

Func

tiona

l/SME

Spon

sor

ITLC

Arch

itectu

re

Testi

ngPl

atfor

m En

ginee

ring

Netw

ork O

p'sPr

oject

Lead

/ Pro

duct

Cente

r











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

System Engineering

Testing


Network Op's


Network Op's


System Engineering

"Sandbox"



Initiate Deployment



Help Desk Prototype

Training


Install Prototype

Begin Step 6

Install

Successful?

User Evaluation of

Prototype


of Prototype

Assessment of

Prototype

Approved

and Ready

to Field?

Yes

No

Yes

Return to

Step 5

No



Engage users for

Prototype Training


Prototype

Return to

Step 5


Prototype

Complete Help Desk

Training


the ATO


Plan

All Phases

Complete?

Provision Access to


plan

No

Conduct Post


(PIR)

PIR

Successful?

End SDDP

Yes

Return to


No

SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans




(WIP)

-Net-Worthiness

(Close)

-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Open)



-ATT (Close)

-ATO (Close)


Plan


SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



SRM























__________AS Deployed_____________





-Operational Test &


-Operational Test &

Evaluation Plans



Update IMS with

Fielding Activities

Yes

Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Deployment Package


Deployment Package















Functional / SME

Sponsor

ITLC

Testing


User Evaluation of

Prototype

Update DOT_LPF

Implementation Plan











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5Step 1 Step 6

Fu

nc

tio

na

l/ S

ME

Sp

on

so

rA

rch

ite

ctu

re

T

ea

m

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

"Sandbox"

.




"Sandbox"



Identified

Top Level

Need

Start


Statement of

Need/Problem

Statement

Review and

Approve statement

of need/problem

statement and work

plan with Sponsor.





milestones and


requirements)

Gather known LRP

requirements


DOD Directives,


and OMB, GAO, BTA

Findings

Determine

Sub-Capability



Prioritization of



criteria

Verify Requirements

Satisfy

all relevant LRP

Constraints

Conduct Enterprise



Strategy

Determine potential


other enterprise

requirements

Sponsor

Approval?

Receive Needs Data

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Open)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (WIP)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Query 'As is'

Repository for

related LRP.


PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Complete

Sub-Capability


of PRM Template

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(WIP)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)


Sub-Capabilities

Requirements?


measures and Key


section of PRM

Template

Identify existing

Key Performance


the Sub-Capability,

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Document :

Statement

of Need /

Problem

Statement


List: Laws,

Regulations,

Policies

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Complete Needs

section of PRM

Template

NoEnterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?




GAO, BTA Findings


PRM Template

No

Yes

End 1.2



LRP.)

Begin 1.3

Decompose

Need/Problem

Statement into

Sub-Capabilities

Needs

PRM

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 1.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree 2.

Sub-

Capability

PRM

Tree N.

Query Architecture

to look for similar

Sub-Capabilities

End 1.3 Begin 1.4


identify the Key


Report:

Identified

attributes to

satisfy the

capability

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes

Determine

Sub-Capability

requirements


Complete

Sub-Capability

Requirement section

of PRM Template

Enterprise

Architecture

Assistance

Needed?

Yes





End 1.4

Begin 1.5

Engage the

Enterprise

Architecture Team

End 1.5

Begin 1.6

Submit

Capabilities

Requirements for

approval

Determine Initial

Scope with general

cost estimate


End 1.6

Review

Capability

Requirements

Corporate

Approval?

Yes

Report:

Performance

Requirements

for the

Capability

No

Yes

All Stop

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Open)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Document: Laws,

Regulations and

Policy constrains/

mandates with

findings for

relevance

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Open)

- Performance

Measures (Open)

Report:

Sub-Capabilities

for the Need

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

All Stop









No

All Stop

Go to Step 2

Approved

Revise

DeniedApproved

Revise

Denied Approved

Denied

Proceed Previous


Revise

Proceed to


No

No

Fu

nctio

nal/

SM

ES

ponsor

Process T

eam

Architectu

re T

eam








Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Process Team

Achitecture Team

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Achitecture Team

Process Team

"Sandbox"


PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)

Start

SDDP 2.0

Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis



may be affected by


processes have been


addressed



Ensure processes



Conduct

Enterprise

Architecture

Analysis

Capture DOTMLPF

interdependencies



processes




of these processes




enterprise level

Develop


formal review

and approval to

proceed


BPR

Package BPR


Register content

in Business

Reference Model

Process

Engineering

Content

Approved?

Yes

BRM








(Open)

BRM







-BPR Assertion




process step





steps




BPR

Assertion

Complete?

Yes

Revise



Define ROI and


Build work plans

Generate BCA

Ensure All expected


address/satisfied

Define Mission


DOTMLPF Capability

Requirements

High Level

Process

describing

expected

outcomes

Work plan

approved?



required

Approved

Revise



Team (I.E "Yellow







No

Characterize the

DOTMLPF execution



and be successful

Execution

Requirements

Approved?

Approved

Begin End

Process

Engineering

DOTMLPF

Implementation

Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

BRM








Process

Information

from SME


to Deliver DOTMLPF


All Stop

Denied

Proceed to Process


No

Proceed to Step 3

All Stop

Denied

All Stop

Denied

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

YesCorporate

Approval?

Yes

Approved

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

No

PRM

- Needs (Close)

- LRP (Close)

- Sub-capabilities

(Close)

- Performance

attributes (Close)

- Performance

Measures (Close)


Process Engineering

Activities

BRM








(Open)

Work Plan

SDDP 1 & 2

- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones

(from Step 1)

Revise

Functional/S

ME

Spon

sor

Syste

m E

ngin

eering

/ D

esig

n

Arc

hitectu

re T

eam

CO

I/E

VT

Govern

ance

Pro

ject Lead / P

roduct

Cente

rP

latform

En

gin

eering

Achitecture Team

Functional / SME

Sponsor


COI / EVT

Governance




Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance


Governance

Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance



Functional / SME

Sponsor


Achitecture Team

COI / EVT

Governance




"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Onboarding






Center

Go to SDDP Step 4

BRM from

Step 2

Begin Finish

Lift information

puts/gets for each

process model





put/get within the

process


flow necessary to


from the process





to meet the process





implementation






Contextual Model

Approve

Review Package

and Select

COA?



Web Service Code /



Model

All Stop

Revise

Denied

Begin 3.0

Start

Material

Solution

Design

Review

and Approve,

Contextual Model

and Work

Plan

All Stop

Approved

Denied


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)















Revise

Contextual Model





Architecture

Support?

No


of solution options

Yes



Web Service Code /



Model

Auditable

Process

model 1

Auditable

Process

model 2

Auditable

Process

model N

Contextual

model for

Process 1

Contextual

model for

Process 2

Contextual

model for

Process N



- Tasks

- Resources

- Timelines

- Milestones




COA to DOTLPF


material solution

Additional

Process

Flows?

Yes

SME

Validation of

Contextual

Model?

Architecture

Support?

No

Yes





Approve

Bounded User

Requirements?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

All Stop

Approved?

SWG review of

Governance

Package

IRB review of

Governance

Package

Greater than

$1M

Approved Yes

Denied

Validate

Contextual Model

content



each COA

DBSMC review of

Governance

Package

No

No


contextual model

Yes

Update DOTMLPF

Implementation plan

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Assemble

Governance

package

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

Approved?

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Revise

All Stop

Denied







-SLAs (Open)


CMO review of

Governance

Package

Approved?

All Stop

Approved

Denied

Revise

Proceed To Sponsor

Review of Package

Derive additional

infrastructure

service necessary

to support COA

Update

Implementation

Plan

Approved

Derive mission


requirements

Conduct

infrastructure

topology analysis

DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (WIP)















-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














DOTMLPF

Implementation Plan


requirements

-ROI and investment

auditability

-Work plans

-BCA

Conduct Cost

Estimates for each

COA

SRM























Create Draft



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)














SRM























SRM
























exchanges / assets









requirement.

Charter Approved

by SWG?

Approve COI

vocabulary

package

Identify

authoritative

and source data

from a process

perspective

Identify ADS

Determine access

rules ,roles and



Stand Up

COI

Develop Draft

Ontology

Stand Down

COI

Proceed to


No

SWG Approval

COI Vocabulary

package

Yes

Generate

Vocabulary

Package

Proceed to


No

SRM























SRM























DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)






-Ontology (Open)


DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)




(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


DRM





(WIP)



-Ontology (WIP)


Yes


wants to use each

put/get (ex.


LRP Compliance



-PIA (Open)

-FISMA (Open)

-NDAA (Open)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Open)





checklist

Identify evidence

that can satisfy

compliance

requirements

LRP Compliance



-PIA (Close)

-FISMA (Close)

-NDAA (Close)

*CCA

*BEA

*EITDR Registration

*Business Process

Reengineering


*Records Management

*FISMA

*ETP


AF Budget

-DIACAP (Close)



Contextual Model

Provide to Sponsor

recommended


COAs to satisfy the

Contextual Model














-Resourcing (WIP)











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Based on the COA




-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)

-COA Package (WIP)

-COAs (Close)


















requirements

DRM





Mapping (Close)



-Ontology (Close)





Exposure Services

Initiate COI

Coordination


SWG


No



development

Draft a new COI

charter or revise


Approved and

COA Selected






DRM

-COI Charter (WIP)


(Open)



(ADS) Mapping (WIP)


(WIP)


(WIP)

-Ontology (WIP)


Sponsor

Champions

ADS

Yes

Identify additional

information

exchanges requiring

new implementation




Sponsor

AF Corporate

Structure

Review

Needed?

Review

Capability

Requirements

with AF

Corporate

Structure

Yes

Corporate

Approval?

No

Proceed to Sponsor

Decision Point

Yes

No

SRM























SRM





































-Resourcing (WIP)

Determine

Distributing

Computing

requirements

Develop service


Develop Service

Levels

Agreements

(SLA's) for each

layer of service

Review Legacy

System

Requirements







-SLAs (Close)


Provide Sponsor

Cost Estimate

Updates


-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)

-SRM (WIP)


-COAs (Close)














Update cost

estimates to M-

Implementation

Plan

BRM (From Step 2)








(Close)

BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)

-Auditable Process

(Close)



Information Assets

(Close)


-BPR Assertion


COI Panel Review



Sponsor

Ensure ontology

reuse

Information

Exchange

Reuse?

No

Extract Reusable



DRMs

Yes

DRM

-COI Charter (Open)






-Ontology (WIP)















-Resourcing (WIP)

Define Platform

Compliance

Requirements

Identify Business /

War Fighter

Enterpise

Architecture

Compliance

Requirements

Search the

Enterpise

Architecture to

identify additional

compliance

requirements

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


SRM























Proceed to COA

Evaluation Decision

Revise

Match Compliance

Requirements to


exchanges, services

and function

Operational

Baseline

Target CEIT

Baseline

Funct

ional/S

ME

Sponso

rS

yste

m E

ngin

eering

Pro

ject

Lead / P

roduct

Cente

rA

rchite

cture

P

latform

E

ngin

eering

Test

ing

ITLC

AQ

Auth

ority

Contr

act

ing

Fin

ance

A

ssoci

ate

d

PE

O/P

MO

Gove

rnance

(C

&A

)

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


Sponsor

System Engineering


Architecture

Testing


ITLC

AQ Authority

Finance

PEO/PMO

Governance (C&A)

Acquire Capability

"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"

Participate in

Kickoff Session


Begin Step 4

Review Bounded

User Requirements

(Acquisition

Strategy Package)

Identify Kickoff

meeting attendees

Call Kickoff

Meeting

Facilitate Kickoff

Meeting











Participate in

Kickoff Session

Approve

IMS


Activities


Activities

Task POCs to

execute IMS


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities


Activities

Yes


No


Activities


Activities

Proceed to Step 5

Participate in

Kickoff Session














Complete IMS

Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Draft IMS (WIP)

Programmatic (WIP)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (WIP)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Complete notional

Development

Schedule











than $1M (Close)




-Resourcing (Close)

Draft IMS (Open)

Programmatic (Open)





-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering








-Development (Open)

-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing











-Testing Activities







-COOP





Review Notional

Development

Schedule and Kick

off meeting

attendees

Validate IMS to M-

Implementation Plan



Develop Code

Configure COTS/GOTS


GOTS/Web Services

Update "M" - DOTLPF



SOW/Task

Order

-Developer

Guidance


Plan (From Step 3)

Draft Test Plan

Implementation

Baseline


Environment

Bounded User

Requirements


-SRM

-DRM

Initiate Government

Acceptance

Source code review


-Target Baseline

-Function Correct







-Unit Test Results

Engage SME for User

Quick Look

Perform User Quick

Look

Discuss Government

Acceptance and


All Stop

Next

Steps

All Stop


order

Validate Developer

Testing

Government

Accept?

(w/ Sponsor)


-Code compiles





Government Accepted


-Source Code (WIP)











for ITLC to fix

ITLC to Fix


-Source Code (WIP)










Proceed to Step 3 -


Proceed to Step 3


Contracting

Governance (C&A)

PEO/PMO

Finance

AQ Authority

ITLC


Testing

Architecture


System Engineering

Sponsor


tiona

l/SM

ESp

onso

rIT

LCSy

stem

Eng

inee

ring

Arch

itect

ure

Test

ing

Plat

form

Eng

inee

ring

Netw

ork

Op's

Proj

ect L

ead

/ Pro

duct

Cen

ter

Gov

erna

nce

(C&

A)

System Engineering

Perform Integration


Testing

Architecture

ITLC


Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME



Network Ops


Testing

Architecture

System Engineering

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

ITLC

Sponsor

Functional / SME

Architecture

Testing


Network Ops


"Sandbox"

"Sandbox"


environment

Verify Rebuild

(Spot Check)

Pass?

Fix & Update Code

package


& Testing


Functionality

User

Evaluation &

Integration

Successful?



Project Leader and


Fix & Update Code

package


Yes

Conduct


Begin Step 5


Evaluation


evaluation


Procedures


Environment


Analyze Test

Report


Independent Testing

Successful?

Success



Continue?




SRM





















Participate in User

Evaluation


Documentation

Update C&A

information


Environment


For Tier 1


Measures & Metrics


Development


Development

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed___________


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Yes

DRM







-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT_________________






Deployment Package












Update IMS with


IMS (Close)






-Resourcing

-Training

-Equipment


-Allocate Funds

-Assign Resources





Engineering









-Component Designs

-Blue Printing


-Code Generation

-Developer Testing






Activities






Activities

-Testing Activities







-COOP





Deployment Package














Deployment Package















DRM






-Ontology (Close)


__________AS BUILT_______




No

Perform Test

Procedure Dry Run

All Stop

All Stop

Deployment Package


Deployment Package




Determine Return

Point

Continue?


All Stop

All Stop


Major Change

SRM























_________________AS Deployed____________

_


Repository (Close)




Update the


Proceed to Step 6

DRM





(Close)



-Ontology (Close)


_____________AS BUILT____________




Network Ops

System Engineering

Sponsor

Functional / SME


For Tier 2


For Tier 3

Initiate Helpdesk


BRM (From Step 2)


(Close)






-BPR Assertion


Implementation

Baseline

Minor Correction

SRM



















_________________AS Deployed_____________



-PRM (Close)

-BRM (Close)


-COAs (Close)














-SRM

-DRM


Components


infrastructure


external interfaces









































Minor Change

No






















Evaluation Criteria

-C&A Complete


-Testing Successful

-DOT_LPF Readiness


ITLC Fix

No Yes



Wait on DOT_LPF


Implementation Plan



-Work plans

-BCA
















BCL & SDDP Alignments

34

The DoD Business Capability Lifecycle (BCL) provides a single governance

and decision support framework to enable faster delivery of business capabilities.

The Challenge: Aligning and integrating BCL, SDDP, and the SEP



Way Ahead & Initiatives

Assessing impact of IT Acquisition Reform on Current SEP

Current SEP requires major revision to align with BCL & SDDP

Infuse new guidance and existing systems engineering practices into a

single, tailorable end-to-end workflow

New phase names and reviews; different process triggers

Incremental delivery; defined timeframes established

Must identify applicability across the spectrum of BES programs

Conduct value stream analysis of existing processes and artifacts

More of “what” and “when”; more flexibility on “how”

Every SEP artifact must be assessed for impact (300+)

1000+ man hours to complete (estimate); extensive reviews

NOTE: New guidance does not supplant existing SE disciplines

36


Process Management Board

(PMB)

Formal board established to manage Continuous Process

Improvement within the SEP

Membership:

Chaired by the BES Directorate Deputy Director

Other members include the OSFs, Division Representatives, and

Functional Area SMEs (T&E, C&A, etc.)

CPI Activities

Initiate changes needed to address policy or governance changes

Review and approve SEP Change Requests (CRs) submitted

Initiate change management activities to support approved

changes (communication, training, monitoring, etc.)

PMB will function as the Configuration Control Board (CCB) for the

SEP; changes will be documented via formal CCB Directive

Facilitated the ESC/HIJG (SEPG)

37


Model RFP / Standard Contract

Language

Request for Proposals (RFPs) typically lack consistency in

Systems Engineering (SE) Language leading to inefficient and

ineffective SE discipline in resulting proposals and contracts

BES is developing model RFP/standard contractual language

Goal: Improve efficiency and effectiveness of RFPs and resulting

proposals

Used as a starting point for RFP development; content may include:

Sample Statement of Objective (SOO) and Statement of Work (SOW)

language

Information to Offerors and Instructions for Proposal Preparation

(ITO/IFPP) – Section L

Standard Evaluation Factors for Award – Section M

Develop standard Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) via

sample DD Form 1423s and document templates

Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) are outdated; studying if SEP

templates can be tied to the CDRLs in place of DIDs

38



Language (Cont’d)

Building upon Industry Day and expanding scope

ESC/EN has developed the Engineering Model RFP Program (EM-

RFP) that includes standard contractual language for SE

disciplines

Modules developed are an excellent starting point but will require

extensive review and update required before PEO BES can

implement

Modules must undergo extensive SME, PK and JA reviews before

publishing

39



Language (Cont’d)

Model RFP/standard contractual language opportunities:

Integrated Master Plan (IMP) & Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

Risk Management

Technical Reviews / Technical Performance Measures

Configuration Management

Program Monitoring and Control (i.e., Metrics)

Architecture

Requirements Analysis and Management

Prototyping and Demonstration

Modeling and Simulation

Software Engineering

Program Protection Planning

IV&V and Test / System Test and Evaluation

40


Legacy web-based SEP decommissioned – budget casualty

Originally delivered via public-facing web page with test/staging

environment; test/staging environment lost

Custom-coded application – lost funding for development personnel;

no organic personnel to fill void

Migrated SEP to SharePoint instance with major issues

Not accessible to those outside AFMC domain and not on .mil net

New access granted case-by-case (via DD Fm 2875 and AF Fm 4394);

approval required by ESC SharePoint manager – (1) month process

Significant external user base without access – including industry

partners, DAU, and other services

Some contracts mandated use of the SEP, but off-base vendors

could not access the SharePoint instance

SEP Hosting – A Solution?


Explored several possibilities

Criteria: Free; unrestricted access; content ownership

GCSS-AF Functional Area (Portal)

Possible solution, but AF Portal accounts required

DAU Acquisition Community Connection (ACC)

Viable solution that meets all criteria

Look and feel different, but allows for complete content delivery

GCSS-AF.com site may be assessed as a potential solution

Proof of Concept: DAU Acquisition Community Connection

SEP Hosting – A Solution?

(Cont’d)


DAU ACC Practice Center

43


Main Page

44


Artifact Types

45


Phase Overviews

46


Phase Overviews (Cont’d)

47


Process Areas

48


Process Areas (Cont’d)

49


What is the Systems Engineering Process (SEP)?

IT Acquisition Reform Initiatives

Business Capability Lifecycle (BCL) & the SEP

Service Development and Delivery Process (SDDP) & the SEP

Way Ahead / Current Initiatives

Rebuilding the SEP

Process Management Board (PMB)

Model RFP/Standard Contract Language

SEP Hosting

50

Summary
