11
Burning mouth syndrome Lisa A. Drage, MD * , Roy S. Rogers III, MD Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA The burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is defined as a symptom complex of those patients with mouth pain who have a clinically normal oral mucosal examination. BMS is a diagnosis of exclusion. Many oral mucosal diseases present with mouth pain; a few examples include lichen planus, recurrent herpes simplex virus infections, and recurrent aphthous stomatitis. A thorough oral examination must be completed to exclude these and other oral diseases before diagnosing BMS. Synonyms for BMS have included glossodynia, glossopyrosis, glossalgia, sto- matodynia, stomatopyrosis, sore tongue and mouth, burning tongue, oral or lingual paresthesia, and oral dysesthesia. Burning mouth syndrome is often stereotyped as a purely psychosomatic disorder occurring in postmen- opausal women, which is resistant to therapy. Although BMS can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, multiple studies have linked BMS to real organic and psychiatric disease and show an improve- ment in symptoms in about 70% of patients with directed therapy [1 – 6]. Faced with a patient who has BMS, dermatologists and other clinicians need to be familiar with its associations and management, and optimistic about potential outcome. The patient variably describes a burning, tingling, painful, hot, scalded, or numb sensation in the oral cavity. The magnitude of BMS pain is quantitatively similar to a toothache [7]. This sensation occurs most commonly on the anterior two thirds and tip of the tongue. Multiple oral sites may be involved. These may include the upper alveolar region, palate, lips, and lower alveolar region [1,2,5,6,8]. Less commonly affected are the buccal mucosa, floor of the mouth, and the throat [4]. With prevalence in the general population of 3.7% [9], BMS affects women seven times more frequently than men [5]. It particularly affects the middle-aged and elderly population (mean age 60) [2,6,10] and has not been reported in children. The average duration of BMS is 2 to 3 years [2,11], with rare patients suffering for decades. Most BMS patients have consulted multiple dentists, physicians, and other health care providers for their complaint and may have tried a host of over-the-counter and pre- scription medications before their presentation [2,4]. Over half state they received insufficient information about BMS from their health care provider [12]. Burning mouth syndrome has been divided into three subtypes based on the daily variation of the symptoms (Table 1) [13]. Type 1 BMS (35%) is characterized by daily pain that is not present on awakening but progresses throughout the day with the greatest problems occurring in the evening hours. Type 2 BMS (55%) patients awake with a constant daily pain, whereas Type 3 BMS (10%) patients have intermittent pain with symptom-free intervals and the pain occurs in unusual sites, such as the buccal mucosa, floor of mouth, and throat. Nonpsychiatric factors have been linked with Type 1 BMS, chronic anxiety with Type 2, and food additives or flavoring allergies with Type 3 BMS. The patients with Type 2 BMS tend to be most resistant to therapy [13,14]. Associated factors Many conditions have been associated with BMS (Table 2) [2]. It should not be surprising that oral pain like any type of pain can have more than one cause. The four main categories are (1) systemic, (2) local, 0733-8635/03/$ – see front matter D 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. PII:S0733-8635(02)00063-3 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (L.A. Drage). Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135 – 145

Burning Mouth Syndrome

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

latest notes on BMS etio patho and management

Citation preview

  • Burning mouth syndrome

    Lisa A. Drage, MD*, Roy S. Rogers III, MD

    Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

    The burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is defined as

    a symptom complex of those patients with mouth

    pain who have a clinically normal oral mucosal

    examination. BMS is a diagnosis of exclusion. Many

    oral mucosal diseases present with mouth pain; a few

    examples include lichen planus, recurrent herpes

    simplex virus infections, and recurrent aphthous

    stomatitis. A thorough oral examination must be

    completed to exclude these and other oral diseases

    before diagnosing BMS. Synonyms for BMS have

    included glossodynia, glossopyrosis, glossalgia, sto-

    matodynia, stomatopyrosis, sore tongue and mouth,

    burning tongue, oral or lingual paresthesia, and

    oral dysesthesia.

    Burning mouth syndrome is often stereotyped as a

    purely psychosomatic disorder occurring in postmen-

    opausal women, which is resistant to therapy.

    Although BMS can be a diagnostic and therapeutic

    challenge, multiple studies have linked BMS to real

    organic and psychiatric disease and show an improve-

    ment in symptoms in about 70% of patients with

    directed therapy [16]. Faced with a patient who has

    BMS, dermatologists and other clinicians need to be

    familiar with its associations and management, and

    optimistic about potential outcome.

    The patient variably describes a burning, tingling,

    painful, hot, scalded, or numb sensation in the oral

    cavity. The magnitude of BMS pain is quantitatively

    similar to a toothache [7]. This sensation occurs most

    commonly on the anterior two thirds and tip of the

    tongue. Multiple oral sites may be involved. These

    may include the upper alveolar region, palate, lips,

    and lower alveolar region [1,2,5,6,8]. Less commonly

    affected are the buccal mucosa, floor of the mouth,

    and the throat [4]. With prevalence in the general

    population of 3.7% [9], BMS affects women seven

    times more frequently than men [5]. It particularly

    affects the middle-aged and elderly population (mean

    age 60) [2,6,10] and has not been reported in children.

    The average duration of BMS is 2 to 3 years [2,11],

    with rare patients suffering for decades. Most BMS

    patients have consulted multiple dentists, physicians,

    and other health care providers for their complaint and

    may have tried a host of over-the-counter and pre-

    scription medications before their presentation [2,4].

    Over half state they received insufficient information

    about BMS from their health care provider [12].

    Burning mouth syndrome has been divided into

    three subtypes based on the daily variation of the

    symptoms (Table 1) [13]. Type 1 BMS (35%) is

    characterized by daily pain that is not present on

    awakening but progresses throughout the day with

    the greatest problems occurring in the evening hours.

    Type 2 BMS (55%) patients awake with a constant

    daily pain, whereas Type 3 BMS (10%) patients have

    intermittent pain with symptom-free intervals and the

    pain occurs in unusual sites, such as the buccal

    mucosa, floor of mouth, and throat. Nonpsychiatric

    factors have been linked with Type 1 BMS, chronic

    anxiety with Type 2, and food additives or flavoring

    allergies with Type 3 BMS. The patients with Type 2

    BMS tend to be most resistant to therapy [13,14].

    Associated factors

    Many conditions have been associated with BMS

    (Table 2) [2]. It should not be surprising that oral pain

    like any type of pain can have more than one cause.

    The four main categories are (1) systemic, (2) local,

    0733-8635/03/$ see front matter D 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

    PII: S0733 -8635 (02 )00063 -3

    * Corresponding author.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (L.A. Drage).

    Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145

  • (3) psychiatric or psychologic, and (4) idiopathic

    factors. The most common associations include psy-

    chiatric or psychologic disorders, xerostomia, nu-

    tritional deficiencies, allergic contact stomatitis,

    denture-related factors, parafunctional behavior, can-

    didiasis, diabetes mellitus, and menopause or hor-

    monal alterations [2].

    Multifactorial

    In more than a third of patients, multiple, concur-

    rent causes of BMS may be identified and need to be

    addressed simultaneously to achieve the best outcome

    possible [15,12,15].

    Psychiatric or psychologic disorders

    Psychiatric disease is a common underlying factor

    in patients with BMS. A psychiatric disease asso-

    ciation has been reported in many series ranging from

    19% to 85% [35,9,11,1325]. At least one third of

    patients may have an underlying psychiatric diag-

    nosis, most commonly depression or anxiety disor-

    ders [2]. A phobic concern regarding cancer is also

    Table 1

    Lamey classification of subtypes of BMS [13]

    Clinical course Association

    Type 1 Daily pain, not present on awakening, increases throughout day Nonpsychiatric

    Type 2 Daily pain, constant Psychiatric, especially chronic anxiety

    Type 3 Intermittent pain, unusual sites (buccal mucosa, floor of mouth) Allergic contact stomatitis to flavorings, additives

    From Lamey PJ, Lamb AB, Hughes A, et al. Type 3 burning mouth syndrome: psychological and allergic aspects. J Oral Pathol

    Med 1994;23:2169; with permission.

    Table 2

    Reported etiologic agents of BMS [2]

    Systemic Local Psychogenic and psychiatric Idiopathic

    Deficiencies Denture factors Psychiatric

    Iron Dental work Depression

    Vitamin B12 Mechanical Anxiety

    Folate Oral habit or parafunctional behavior Obsessive compulsive disorder

    Zinc Clenching Somatoform disorder

    B complex vitamins Bruxism Cancerphobia

    Endocrine Tongue thrusting Psychosocial stressors

    Diabetes mellitus Myofascial pain

    Hypothyroidism Allergic contact stomatitis

    Menopause or hormonal Dental restoration or denture materials

    Foods

    Xerostomia Preservative, additives, flavorings

    Connective tissue disease Neurologic

    Sjogrens syndrome Referred from tonsils or teeth

    Sicca syndrome Lingual nerve neuropathy

    Drug-related Glossopharyngeal neuropathy

    Anxiety or stress Acoustic neuroma

    Medication Infection

    ACE inhibitor Candidiasis

    Esophageal reflux Antibiotic related

    Anemia Denture related

    Local trauma

    Corticosteroid

    Diabetes mellitus

    Fusospirochetal

    Xerostomia

    Irradiation

    Local disease

    From Drage LA, Rogers RS III. Clinical assessment and outcome in 70 patients with complaints of burning or sore mouth

    symptoms. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:2238; with permission.

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145136

  • prominent in 20% of patients [5]. The BMS patient

    may be concerned that the symptoms are caused by

    oral or systemic cancer, although the patient rarely

    shares this concern spontaneously with the physician.

    Repeated self-examination may be a marker for

    cancerphobia [4].

    Although BMS may be a somatic symptom of

    depression in some cases, the association does not

    always equate to a causal relationship. Depression and

    psychologic disturbance are common in chronic pain

    populations and may be secondary to chronic pain

    rather than the cause of BMS. Studies have reported

    similarities between the personality characteristics of

    chronic oral pain patients and other chronic pain

    populations [7]. Similar sleep disturbances have also

    been documented in these populations [8]. In addition,

    many of the medications used to treat psychiatric

    disease can cause xerostomia and exacerbate BMS.

    Although psychiatric disorders are clearly sig-

    nificant for some patients with BMS, it is important

    not to leap to the conclusion that all BMS is caused

    by psychiatric problems. Unfortunately, psychiatric

    causes are frequently postulated when no easy

    answer is apparent. Each patient with BMS should

    receive a careful evaluation for both psychiatric and

    organic causes of pain. This thorough examination

    may unveil a local or systemic cause for their

    symptomatology and is often therapeutic, reassuring

    the patient about concerns regarding oral cancer.

    During the evaluation, direct questions about depres-

    sion, anxiety, and fear of cancer and a family history

    of psychiatric disorders or oral cancer should be

    posed. When warranted, further evaluation and docu-

    mentation of psychiatric disease by psychiatric con-

    sultation should be sought. A team approach is

    important; psychiatric staff may not feel as comfort-

    able confirming the diagnosis of BMS because they

    are less familiar with oral disease.

    Xerostomia

    A dry mouth is a frequent complaint among BMS

    patients and can be found in up to 25% [2,5,6] of

    patients with these complaints. Decreased oral lu-

    brication may result in increased friction and discom-

    fort leading to BMS (Fig. 1). Xerostomia itself can be

    multifactorial. Drug-related xerostomia is common

    [2,22] and can occur with many medications includ-

    ing tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, mon-

    amine oxidase inhibitors, antihypertensives, and

    antihistamines. Connective tissue diseases, such as

    Sjogrens syndrome or sicca syndrome, can cause

    xerostomia [2,8], as can a history of local irradiation

    or diabetes mellitus. Even stress and anxiety can lead

    to a dry mouth. Although hypothesized, age-related

    or menopausal xerostomia has not been conclusively

    documented [26].

    Nutritional deficiencies

    Because of rapid cell turnover and trauma, the oral

    cavity is especially sensitive to nutritional deficien-

    cies and may be the first indicator of such a problem.

    Iron deficiency anemia, pernicious anemia (an auto-

    immune B12 deficiency), zinc deficiency, and B

    complex vitamin deficiency [20] have all been

    reported to cause BMS. Nutritional deficiencies have

    been claimed to cause BMS in as few as 2% [15] and

    as many as 33% [1] of patients. The mucosal alter-

    ations associated with these deficiency states, such as

    erythema, glossitis, loss of papillae, or atrophy, may

    be absent in BMS patients (Fig. 2). Replacement

    therapy may be helpful in BMS patients with docu-

    mented deficiencies [2,5,6,20,27].

    Allergic contact stomatitis

    The role of allergens in BMS is somewhat con-

    troversial. Although some studies claim a high prev-

    alence of allergy to dentures and dental materials,

    such as acrylates, nickel, mercury, gold, and cobalt

    [2830], more recent studies [2,31] were unable to

    implicate denture or denture materials as a frequent

    cause of BMS. Because true allergies to denture

    materials are rare, patients should not be considered

    allergic to denture or dental material until controlled

    patch testing has been correlated with clinical symp-

    Fig. 1. Xerostomia. A dry mouth is a common complaint of

    patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Note the dry,

    erythematous, fissured tongue plus angular cheilitis.

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145 137

  • toms. Patients with Type 3 BMS (intermittent pain)

    are more likely to have positive patch tests [13].

    Flavoring or food additives have been implicated.

    This subtype clearly merits patch testing. Lamey et al

    [13] noted 65% of Type 3 BMS cohort had positive

    patch tests and 80% of this group improved with

    avoidance of the implicated allergen. Cinnamon alde-

    hyde (cinnamon), sorbic acid, tartrazine, benzoic

    acid, propylene glycol, menthol, and peppermint have

    all been identified as potential causes of mouth pain

    [2,13,31]. Note the contribution of LeSueur and

    Yiannis on contact stomatitis elsewhere in this issue.

    Denture-related problems

    Pain affecting only denture-bearing tissue, a tem-

    poral association with denture use, or improvement

    with discontinuation of dentures is a clue to denture-

    related BMS. Rather than an allergic response to

    denture material, denture-related pain is usually

    caused by faulty design, irritation, or parafunctional

    behavior. Candidiasis can also contribute to denture-

    related pain. Main and Basker [6] attributed BMS to

    denture design faults in 50% of patients; with replace-

    ment of dentures the patients improved. Lamey and

    Lamb [5] noted 60% of BMS patients had denture

    design faults, but only half of these patients improved

    after denture replacement. The main denture design

    faults of concern are (1) restricted tongue space, (2)

    lack of freeway space, and (3) underextended denture

    bases [4]. These denture design faults can increase the

    stress on surrounding tissues or change the normal

    function of the tongue. Most BMS patients with

    dentures or significant dental work benefit from

    referral for a formal dental consultation to assess

    dental work, dentures, occlusion, and the need for

    modification or replacement. This topic is addressed

    by Kupp and Sheridan elsewhere in this issue.

    Parafunctional behavior

    Burning mouth syndrome associated with para-

    functional behavior is probably more common than is

    realized and is often under appreciated by physicians.

    Lamey and Lamb [5] found parafunctional activity a

    concern in 13% of a group of patients with BMS.

    Patients who clench or grind their teeth, thrust their

    tongue repetitively (Fig. 3), run their tongue against

    Fig. 2. Smooth tongue. A smooth tongue is atrophic with

    loss of filiform papillae. This permits an increased sen-

    sitivity to irritants causing BMS. A smooth tongue may

    indicate a systemic condition, such as pernicious anemia,

    iron deficiency anemia, or gluten-sensitive enteropathy.

    Fig. 3. Tongue thrusting. Parafunctional habits, such as

    tongue thrusting, may cause, or occur secondary to, the

    symptoms of BMS. Note the crenulated or scalloped borders

    to the tongue. Similar findings are seen with macroglossia.

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145138

  • their teeth, or try to reseat an ill-fitting denture with

    their tongue may develop oral pain. These behaviors

    may be unconscious or may only occur at times of

    stress. Examination of the tooth surface and dentures

    can sometime give clues to parafunctional behavior.

    Dental consultation may be helpful in identifying and

    managing these behaviors.

    Candidiasis

    Reported as a causative factor in 6% [5] to 30%

    [15] of patients with BMS, the mucosal alterations

    typically associated with candidiasis may be minimal

    or absent in BMS patients. Osaki et al [32] reported

    subclinical candidiasis as a cause of BMS in 25% of a

    patient cohort. Glossal pain subsided with treatment

    with 3% amphotericin mouthwash solution. Oral

    candidiasis is an opportunistic infection. A normal

    constituent of the mouth in 40% of patients, candidal

    overgrowth occurs with xerostomia, corticosteroid

    treatment, antibiotic treatment, denture use, and dia-

    betes mellitus. Empiric treatment for oral candidiasis

    is often prescribed to patients with BMS.

    Diabetes mellitus

    Metabolic alterations in the oral mucosae, diabetic

    neuropathy, and angiopathy are all proposed mecha-

    nisms behind BMS in patients with diabetes mellitus.

    Xerostomia and oral candidiasis may also contribute

    to the problem. About 5% of BMS patients have

    diabetes mellitus [4]. BMS is the second most com-

    mon oral complaint after xerostomia in a study of

    diabetic patients [1]. Control of diabetes mellitus may

    lead to improvement or cure of BMS.

    Menopause or hormonal alterations

    Most patients seen by physicians for BMS are

    women. All the literature on BMS finds that this

    condition is more common in women than men with a

    ratio of 7 to 1 [4]. Other oral pain syndromes are also

    seen more commonly in women [33]. In light of the

    prevalence of BMS in postmenopausal women, a role

    for a hormonal impact on BMS has long been

    suspected [1,34]. In controlled clinical trials with

    systemic or local estrogen treatment, however, neither

    was more effective than placebo in the treatment of

    BMS [10,35]. No significant differences are found

    between women with mouth pain and a control group

    in number of years since menopause, use of estrogen

    replacement therapy, or number of years of use of

    estrogen replacement therapy [8,33]. Although

    clearly a significant link between BMS and this age

    group of women exists and may be tied with meno-

    pause, there is currently no proven benefit of hor-

    mone replacement therapy in BMS.

    Drug-related BMS

    The ACE inhibitors enalapril, captopril, and lisi-

    nopril can cause scalded mouth or BMS. There is

    improvement with reduction or discontinuation of the

    medication [36].

    Normal mucosal findings

    Often regarded as asymptomatic variants of nor-

    mal, multiple studies have shown geographic (Fig. 4),

    fissured (Fig. 5), or scalloped tongues more frequently

    in patients with tongue pain [2,15,37,38]. Although

    the patient with oral pain and these findings techni-

    cally does not fit under the rubric of BMS, the

    connection between these oral findings and oral pain

    has been documented and should be recognized.

    These findings can also increase the patients fear of

    cancer. The article on glossitis by Byrd et al elsewhere

    in this issue addresses this topic in greater detail.

    Evaluation and work-up of the patient with BMS

    The many causes and multifactorial nature of

    BMS make an organized approach to evaluation

    important (Table 3). Diagnosis and treatment may

    Fig. 4. Geographic tongue. The geographic tongue is a

    combination of an atrophic tongue with a red base caused by

    diminished filiform papillae (with resultant hypersensitivity)

    and a furred tongue with a white base and hyperplasia of

    filiform papillae. The geographic tongue may be sympto-

    matic. (From Drage LA, Rogers RS III. Clinical assessment

    and outcome in 70 patients with complaints of burning or

    sore mouth symptoms. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:2238;

    with permission.)

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145 139

  • be achieved best by a multidisciplinary approach

    involving the dermatologist and the primary care

    provider, dentist, psychiatrist, and otorhinolaryngol-

    ogist. Simply treating the patient in a sympathetic

    manner may improve the interaction and perhaps the

    outcome [2,3,12].

    Directed history concentrating on the medical,

    dental, and psychologic or psychiatric history and

    review of symptoms should occur. The description

    of oral pain should include the following: duration;

    character; level (scale of 1 to 10); site of involve-

    ment; and subtype or pattern. Frank questions about

    depression, anxiety, and fear of cancer should be

    posed. Exacerbating factors, such as food and oral

    preparations (mouthwash, gum, mints, toothpaste,

    lip cosmetics, and smoking), should be elicited.

    Relationship of pain to denture use, dental work,

    and parafunctional oral behavior (tongue thrusting,

    bruxism, or jaw clenching) should be documented.

    All medications must be assessed for xerosto-

    mic potential.

    Physical examination with emphasis on a thor-

    ough oral examination must be completed. Besides

    identifying other diseases that could cause mouth

    pain, this reassures the patient that cancer is not

    present. Evaluation should include assessment for

    erythema, glossitis, atrophy, candidiasis, geographic

    tongue, lichen planus, and xerostomia. Clinicians with

    knowledge and experience in the broad range and

    presentation of oral disease are best equipped to

    certify a truly normal oral mucosal examination.

    Examination of dental work, dentures, denture func-

    tion, and signs of parafunctional behavior may be

    assessed best by a dental consultation.

    Laboratory examination should include the per-

    tinent tests in Table 2. Biopsy specimens are

    unlikely to be beneficial if a normal clinical

    examination is confirmed. Patch testing is espe-

    cially important and fruitful in the patient with

    Type 3 BMS and should include a standard series,

    metal series, and oral flavorings and preservatives

    (Box 1). The list of allergens is discussed in the

    contribution by LeSueur and Yiannis elsewhere in

    this issue.

    Management

    Burning mouth syndrome is a manageable prob-

    lem with most patients responding to tailored therapy

    (Box 2). Management should focus on controlling or

    eliminating all potential causes of BMS, keeping in

    mind that in many patients more than one factor

    plays a role. Because of the number of conditions

    causing oral pain, a single treatment protocol is not

    appropriate. Treatment is tailored to the proposed

    Table 3

    Work-up of BMS

    Thorough history and review of symptoms

    Medications causing xerostomia

    Dental or denture work

    Oral care, oral products

    Oral habits or parafunctional behavior

    History of depression, anxiety, cancerphobia

    Family history of oral cancer, psychiatric diagnoses, and

    connective tissue disease

    Oral examination

    Erythema, candidiasis, xerostomia or other mucosal

    abnormalities

    Tongue disorders, such as a geographic, fissured, or

    atrophic tongue

    Dental work or dentures

    Laboratory tests

    Complete blood count

    Iron, total iron binding capacity, iron saturation, ferritin

    Vitamin B12, folate, zinc

    Glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin

    Culture for Candida

    Patch testing

    Include standard series, metal series, oral flavors and

    preservatives

    Further consultation if indicated by history and review

    of systems

    Psychometric testing and psychiatric consultation

    Dentistry

    Neurology

    Otorhinolaryngology

    Fig. 5. Fissured tongue. The fissured tongue is rare in

    neonates and more common with age. About one sixth of

    older patients have grooves and fissuring of the tongue

    dorsum. Impaction of food and keratin debris can predispose

    to inflammation and halitosis.

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145140

  • causes. Management plans for different scenarios

    are reviewed.

    Psychiatric disorders

    A supportive environment is beneficial for con-

    tinued treatment of the patient and may aid resolu-

    tion of the symptoms in concert with other therapies

    [2,3]. Psychiatric evaluation, medication, and psy-

    chotherapy [39] may play a role in alleviating the

    symptoms. Although optimally undertaken with the

    guidance of a psychiatrist or psychologist; some

    patients are resistant to psychiatric evaluation. Anti-

    depressants and anxiolytics with less anticholinergic

    impact (hence less xerostomia) are preferred. Sero-

    tonin reuptake inhibitors typically cause less xero-

    stomia and may be a good choice in this setting.

    Reassurance that cancer is not present should be

    stated clearly and repeatedly.

    Denture or dental-related pain

    Evaluation of dental work, dentures, denture

    design faults, and parafunctional behavior by a spe-

    cialist should be sought. Adaptation or replacement

    may lead to relief of BMS. Removal of dentures at

    night may be helpful. Avoidance of irritants, treat-

    ment of dentures with anti-candidal agents, and a

    review of dental hygiene should occur.

    Deficiency syndromes

    Replacement of iron, B12, folate, or zinc should

    occur in patients with documented deficiencies. Grad-

    ual improvement may follow. Evaluation into the

    cause of the document deficiency must occur before

    supplementation. Supplementation in absence of

    documented deficiency is difficult to justify aside

    from B vitamin replacement [20]. Lamey [3] recom-

    mends empiric replacement of vitamins B1 (300 mg,

    once a day) and vitamin B6 (50 mg, three times a day)

    for 4 weeks.

    Allergic contact stomatitis

    Patch testing to dental and denture components,

    metals, additives, preservatives, flavors and a stan-

    dard series should occur under the supervision of a

    dermatologist who is experienced in their proper use

    and interpretation. The clinical correlation between

    the patch test results and patient exposure history is

    the most important component of the testing. Patient

    education and training regarding the avoidance of

    identified allergens is imperative.

    Candidiasis

    Because Candida is a normal part of the oro-

    pharyngeal flora, a positive culture does not equate

    to a pathologic process. Tests that quantitate Can-

    dida infection are not available routinely. Typically,

    empiric treatment for oral candidiasis is offered to

    the patient with BMS and may benefit a subset of

    patients. Treatment may include use of nystatin or

    clotrimazole, which are available in multiple forms

    including creams, rinses, and troche. One example

    of an effective treatment regimen includes the use

    of oral fluconazole, 100 mg Number 15: Day 1,

    two pills; days 27, one pill; days 821, one pill

    every other day. Dentures should also be treated for

    Box 1. Patch testing in BMS

    1. Standard series (The MayoClinic series includes 68 differentallergens)

    2. Oral flavorings and preservatives3. Metal series

    The allergens tested should include (butnot be limited to) the following:

    Methyl methacrylateEthyl acrylateEthyleneglycol dimethacrylateTriethyleneglycol dimethacrylateBIS GMABenzoyl peroxidePropylene glycolSorbic acidBenzoic acidTartrazine yellowPeppermintSpearmintCinnamic aldehydeMentholFragrance mixBalsam of PeruCobalt chlorideNickel sulfateGold sodium thiosulfateAmalgamMercuric chlorideCadmium chloridePotassium dichromateFormaldehydep- Phenylenediamine

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145 141

  • candidiasis and dental hygiene reviewed. Dentures

    should always be removed at night. Many patients

    sleep with dentures in place all night. This predis-

    poses to parafunctional habits and recurrent candi-

    diasis (denture stomatitis).

    Diabetes mellitus

    All patients with BMS need to have diabetes

    mellitus excluded with fasting blood glucose levels.

    Patients with abnormal findings should be referred

    for management and education. Control of diabetes

    mellitus many lead to decrease in BMS. Change of

    the diabetic medications can sometimes be helpful.

    Some patients may need oral agents or some may

    need insulin therapy.

    Parafunctional habits

    Once identified, management many include modi-

    fication of denture design; behavioral therapy consist-

    ing of habit monitoring, biofeedback, and relaxation

    techniques [12]; and use of sugar-free chewing gum,

    mouth guards, and even hypnotherapy.

    Xerostomia

    A number of general measures may be instituted

    to counteract xerostomia (Box 3). The discontinua-

    tion or substitution of medications with potential for

    Box 2. Management strategies for BMS

    Tenets of treatment:1. Focus on controlling or eliminating

    all potential causes of BMS2. Tailor treatment for individual pa-

    tient based on suspected causes3. Resort to empiric therapy only if

    no cause of BMS is found or failureof treatment

    Management plans may include thefollowing:

    Psychiatric and psychologic disorder

    Maintain supportive environmentPsychiatric evaluation and

    managementAppropriate medication or

    psychotherapyReassure cancer is not present

    Denture or dental work

    Evaluation by dentistAdaptation or replacement as needed

    Deficiency syndromes

    Document deficiencyEvaluate cause of deficiencyReplacement therapy

    Allergic contact stomatitis

    Referral to dermatologist with experi-ence in use and interpretation ofpatch tests

    Patch test to standard, metal, oralpreservatives, flavor series

    Clinical correlationPatient education in avoidance of iden-

    tified allergen

    Candidiasis

    CultureTreatment with anti-candidiasis agents

    Diabetes mellitus

    Referral for management and education

    Parafunctional behavior

    Dental evaluation

    Behavioral therapySugar-free chewing gum

    Xerostomia

    Discontinue medications thatcause xerostomia

    General measuresSaliva substituteSialogogues

    Idiopathic (empiric treatment)

    Avoid irritantsTrial of treatment with

    anti-candidal agentB-vitamin replacementDoxepin trialLow-dose tricyclic antidepressantsLocal clonazepamConsider referral to specialist in

    oral medicine

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145142

  • causing xerostomia should be sought. Because xero-

    stomia is a very common medication side effect,

    sometimes a simple reduction in the number of

    drugs used may improve xerostomia. Artificial sali-

    va substitutes may be helpful. Sialogogues, such as

    pilocarpine, are sometimes used [32]. Note the

    contribution by Parks and Lancaster on oral mani-

    festations of systemic disease elsewhere in this issue

    for additional discussion of xerostomia and therapy

    of the dry mouth.

    Idiopathic

    If no underlying cause for BMS is found or

    treatment targeted to a proposed etiology is not

    beneficial, treatment options may follow a more

    empiric approach. This may include discontinuation

    of irritating substances (alcohol-based mouthwashes,

    cinnamon or mint products, and smoking); a trial

    treatment with anti-candidal agents; and trial treat-

    ment with B complex vitamins [3]. Doxepin, famil-

    iar to many dermatologists, is often prescribed in

    doses up to 75 mg for its antianxiety and antide-

    pressant affects. At higher doses doxepin has a

    greater potential for cardiac arrhythmia, xerostomia,

    and full antidepressant effect and needs to be

    carefully monitored

    If no response is seen, tricyclic antidepressants

    may be used in a chronic pain protocol manner

    [2,5,26]. Typical doses include amitriptyline, 10 to

    75 mg. Low doses of tricyclic antidepressants may

    have an analgesic affect that is separate from their

    action as antidepressants [33]. Use of benzodiaze-

    pines [40,41] including systemic clonazepam [18]

    have been reported to be effective in BMS.

    Although the mechanism for their action may not

    rely solely on their anxiolytic effect, concerns

    regarding the chronic nature of BMS and the poten-

    tial for abuse of this class of medication merits

    cautious use. Interestingly, Woda et al [42] reported

    benefit in 52% of patients treated with local applica-

    tion of clonazepam (0.5 to 1 mg) two to three times

    a day. They theorized that local application of

    clonazepam acts locally to disrupt the neuropatho-

    logic mechanism that underlies BMS. More unusual

    treatments reported have included use of capsaicin

    [43] and infrared laser [44].

    Burning mouth syndrome is a treatable syndrome.

    Treatment is associated with improvement in about

    70% of patients [16] using a directed approach. If

    that fails, an empiric approach is warranted. Spon-

    taneous remissions have also been noted to occur

    [45,46].

    Summary

    Burning mouth syndrome is the occurrence of oral

    pain in a patient with a normal oral mucosal exam-

    ination. It can be caused by both organic and psycho-

    logic or psychiatric factors, which can be broken

    down into local, systemic, psychologic or psychiatric,

    and idiopathic causes. The most frequently associated

    conditions are psychiatric (depression, anxiety, or

    cancerphobia); xerostomia; nutritional deficiency;

    allergic contact dermatitis; candidiasis; denture-

    related pain; and parafunctional behavior. Multiple

    different factors contributing to the oral pain are

    common, and a systematic approach to the evaluation

    is important.

    Identification of correctable causes of BMS should

    be emphasized and psychiatric causes should not be

    invoked without thorough evaluation of the patient. A

    Box 3. Xerostomia management

    General measures include the following:

    Review medications and replacethose with known xerostomic po-tential. Discontinue unnecessarymedications.

    Increase water intake throughoutthe day

    Use humidifier in bedroomAvoid alcohol and alcohol-containing

    mouthwashAvoid caffeineUse sugar-free candy, gum, and

    beveragesUse petroleum jelly on lips before bed

    and throughout dayFrequent dental examination. Patients

    with xerostomia have increased riskof cavities and gum disease.

    Commercial saliva substitutes: use asoften as needed and before bed;available without a prescription.

    Examples include the following:

    Mouth Kote (spray)Moi-stir-spray and swabsOptimoist (spray)

    SialogoguePilocarpine, 5 mg tidCivemeline, 30 mg tid

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145 143

  • directed history and careful oral examination must be

    completed to exclude local diseases and identify clues

    to potential causes. Assessment of medications, psy-

    chiatric history and background, and selected labora-

    tory and patch tests may help identify the etiologies of

    these symptoms.

    Treatment should be tailored to each patient and

    may best be managed in a multidisciplinary approach

    with input from dermatologists, dentists, psychiatrists,

    otorhinolaryngologists, and primary care providers. A

    thoughtful and structured evaluation of the patient

    with BMS has been associated with improvement in

    about 70% of patients. The remaining patients may

    benefit from empiric therapy with a chronic pain pro-

    tocol and continued supportive interactions.

    References

    [1] Basker RM, Sturdee DW, Davenport JC. Patients with

    burning mouths: a clinical investigation of causative

    factors, including the climacteric and diabetes. Br

    Dent J 1978;145:916.

    [2] Drage LA, Rogers III RS. Clinical assessment and out-

    come in 70 patients with complaints of burning or sore

    mouth symptoms. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:2238.

    [3] Lamey PJ. Burning mouth syndrome: approach to suc-

    cessful management. Dent Update 1998;25:298300.

    [4] Lamey PJ. Burning mouth syndrome. Dermatol Clin

    1996;14:33954.

    [5] Lamey PJ, Lamb AB. Prospective study of aetiological

    factors in burning mouth syndrome. BMJ 1988;296:

    12436.

    [6] Main DM, Basker RM. Patients complaining of a burn-

    ing mouth: further experience in clinical assessment

    and management. Br Dent J 1983;154:20611.

    [7] Grushka M, Sessle BJ, Miller R. Pain and personality

    profiles in burning mouth syndrome. Pain 1987;28:

    15567.

    [8] Grushka M. Clinical features of burning mouth syn-

    drome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol

    Endod 1987;63:306.

    [9] Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J. Burning mouth syndrome:

    prevalence and associated factors. J Oral Pathol Med

    1999;28:3504.

    [10] Ferguson MM, Carter J, Boyle P, et al. Oral complaints

    related to climacteric symptoms in oophorectomized

    women. J R Soc Med 1981;74:4928.

    [11] Browning S, Hislop S, Scully C, et al. The association

    between burning mouth syndrome and psychosocial

    disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol

    Endod 1987;64:1714.

    [12] Tourne LP, Fricton JR. Burning mouth syndrome: crit-

    ical review and proposed clinical management. Oral

    Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1992;

    74:15867.

    [13] Lamey PJ, Lamb AB, Hughes A, et al. Type 3 burning

    mouth syndrome: psychological and allergic aspects.

    J Oral Pathol Med 1994;23:2169.

    [14] Lamb AB, Lamey PJ, Reeve PE. Burning mouth syn-

    drome: psychological aspects. Br Dent J 1988;165:

    25660.

    [15] Zegarelli DJ. Burning mouth: an analysis of 57 pa-

    tients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol

    Endod 1984;58:348.

    [16] Bogetto F, Maina G, Ferro G, et al. Psychiatric comor-

    bidity in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Psy-

    chosom Med 1998;60:37885.

    [17] Grinspan D, Blanco FG, Allevato MA, et al. Burning

    mouth syndrome. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:4837.

    [18] Grushka M, Epstein J, Mott A. An open-label, dose

    escalation pilot study of the effect of clonazepam in

    burning mouth syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral

    Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:55761.

    [19] Haneke E. Burning mouth syndrome. In: Burgdorf

    WHC, Katz SB, editors. Dermatology: progress and

    perspectives. New York: Parthenon Publishing; 1993.

    p. 5845.

    [20] Lamey PJ, Allam BF. Vitamin status of patients with

    burning mouth syndrome and the response to replace-

    ment therapy. Br Dent J 1986;160:814.

    [21] Lamey PJ, Lewis MA. Oral medicine in practice: burn-

    ing mouth syndrome. Br Dent J 1989;167:197200.

    [22] Maresky LS, van der Bijl P, Gird I. Burning mouth

    syndrome: evaluation of multiple variables among 85

    patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol

    Endod 1993;75:3037.

    [23] Rojo L, Silvestre FJ, Bagan JV, et al. Psychiatric mor-

    bidity in burning mouth syndrome: psychiatric inter-

    view versus depression and anxiety scales. Oral Surg

    Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1993;75:

    30811.

    [24] van der Ploeg HM, van der Waal N, Eijkman MAJ, et

    al. Psychological aspects of patients with burning

    mouth syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral

    Radiol Endod 1987;63:6648.

    [25] van der Waal I. The burning mouth syndrome. Copen-

    hagen: Munksgaard; 1990.

    [26] Grushka M. Burning mouth syndrome. Dent Clin

    North Am 1991;35:17184.

    [27] Schmitt RJ, Sheridan PJ, Rogers III RS. Pernicious

    anemia with associated glossodynia. J Am Dent Assoc

    1988;117:83840.

    [28] Dutree-Meulenberg ROGM, Kozel MMA, van Joost

    Th. Burning mouth syndrome: a possible etiologic role

    for local contact hypersensitivity. J Am Acad Dermatol

    1992;26:93540.

    [29] Kaaber S, Thulin H, Nielsen E. Skin sensitivity to

    denture base materials in the burning mouth syndrome.

    Contact Dermatitis 1979;5:906.

    [30] van Joost TH, van Ulsen J, van Loon LAJ. Contact

    allergy to denture materials in the burning mouth syn-

    drome. Contact Dermatitis 1988;18:979.

    [31] Helton J, Storrs F. The burning mouth syndrome: lack

    of a role for contact urticaria and contact dermatitis.

    J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:2015.

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145144

  • [32] Osaki T, Yoneda K, Yamamoto T, et al. Candidiasis

    may induce glossodynia without objective manifesta-

    tion. Am J Med Sci 2000;319:1005.

    [33] Mott AE, Grushka M, Sessle BJ. Diagnosis and man-

    agement of taste disorders and burning mouth syn-

    drome. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:3371.

    [34] Wardrop RW, Hailes J, Burger H, et al. Oral discomfort

    at menopause. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral

    Radiol Endod 1989;67:53540.

    [35] Pisanty S, Rafaely B, Polishuk WZ. The effect of ste-

    roid hormones on buccal mucosa of menopausal wom-

    en. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod

    1975;40:34653.

    [36] Savino LB, Haushalter NM. Lisinopril induced

    scalded mouth syndrome. Pharmacol Ther 1992;26:

    13812.

    [37] Gorsky M, Silverman Jr S, Chinn H. Burning mouth

    syndrome: a review of 98 cases. J Oral Med 1987;42:

    79.

    [38] Powell FC. Glossodynia and other disorders of the

    tongue. Dermatol Clin 1987;5:68793.

    [39] Bergdahl J, Anneroth G. Burning mouth syndrome:

    literature review and model for research and manage-

    ment. J Oral Pathol Med 1993;22:4338.

    [40] Gorsky M, Silverman Jr S, Chinn H. Clinical charac-

    teristics and management outcome in the burning

    mouth syndrome: an open study of 130 patients. Oral

    Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod

    1991;72:1925.

    [41] Huang W, Rothe MJ, Grant-Kels JM. The burning

    mouth syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34:918.

    [42] Woda A, Navez ML, Picard P, et al. A possible ther-

    apeutic solution for stomatodynia (burning mouth syn-

    drome). J Orofacial Pain 1998;12:2728.

    [43] Epstein JB, Marcoe JH. Topical application of capsai-

    cin for treatment of oral neuropathic pain and trigemi-

    nal neuralgia. Oral Surg Oral Path 1994;77:13540.

    [44] Cekic-Arambasin A, Durdevic-Matricc A, Mravak-

    Stipetic M, et al. Use of soft laser in the treatment of

    oral symptoms. Acta Stomatol Croat 1990;24:2818.

    [45] Gilpin SF. Glossodynia. JAMA 1936;106:17224.

    [46] Grushka M, Katz RL, Sessle BJ. Spontaneous remis-

    sion in burning mouth syndrome (BMS) [abstract].

    J Dent Res 1986;66:274.

    L.A. Drage, R.S. Rogers III / Dermatol Clin 21 (2003) 135145 145