1
Bunye vs. Sandiganbayan 306 SCRA 663; May 5, 1999 J. Purisima FACTS: Criminal Case No. 13966 before the Sandiganbayan charged herein petitioners Bunye et. al., with a violation of Section 3, paragrapg (e) of R.A. No. 3019. Accused allegedly while in the performance of their official functions in conspiracy with one another and taking advantage of their official positions, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously enact Kapisayahan Bilang 45 on August 1, 1988, and on the basis thereof, forcibly took possession of the New Public Market in Alabang, Muntinlupa, Metro Manila, and thereafter took over the operation and management of the aforesaid public market starting August 19, 1988, despite the fact that, there was a valid and subsisting lease contract executed on September 2, 1985 for a term of 25 years, renewable for another 25 years, between the Municipality of Muntinlupa, Metro Manila, and complainants. After trial on the merits, the Sandiganbayan came out with its July 26, 1995 Decision, finding petitioners guilty of violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. Hence, this petition. ISSUE: Whether or not petitioners are indeed guilty of violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act HELD: Explicit in Sec. 149 (3) of B.P. No. 337 is the requirement of a public bidding and that the term of the contract does not exceed 5 years. Thus, Mayor Bunye is not guilty of anti-graft in canceling the lease contract of the market with a term of 25 years.

Bunye vs Sandiganbayan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Bunye vs Sandiganbayan

Bunye vs. Sandiganbayan306 SCRA 663; May 5, 1999

J. Purisima

FACTS:Criminal Case No. 13966 before the Sandiganbayan charged herein petitioners Bunye et. al., with a violation of Section 3, paragrapg (e) of R.A. No. 3019.

Accused allegedly while in the performance of their official functions in conspiracy with one another and taking advantage of their official positions, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously enact Kapisayahan Bilang 45 on August 1, 1988, and on the basis thereof, forcibly took possession of the New Public Market in Alabang, Muntinlupa, Metro Manila, and thereafter took over the operation and management of the aforesaid public market starting August 19, 1988, despite the fact that, there was a valid and subsisting lease contract executed on September 2, 1985 for a term of 25 years, renewable for another 25 years, between the Municipality of Muntinlupa, Metro Manila, and complainants.

After trial on the merits, the Sandiganbayan came out with its July 26, 1995 Decision, finding petitioners guilty of violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. Hence, this petition.

ISSUE: Whether or not petitioners are indeed guilty of violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act

HELD:Explicit in Sec. 149 (3) of B.P. No. 337 is the requirement of a public bidding and that the term of the contract does not exceed 5 years. Thus, Mayor Bunye is not guilty of anti-graft in canceling the lease contract of the market with a term of 25 years.