12

Click here to load reader

Bulgarian Language and the Language Universals

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Лилия ИлиеваЛ. Илиева. Българският език и езиковите универсалии. – В: Summa cum pietate. Studia litterarum. Отговорността пред езика. Книга 2. Шумен, 2009, с. 34-43. [Lilia Ilieva. Bulgarian Language and the Language Universals. A Paper]. BULGARIAN AND LANGUAGE UNIVERSALSKey words: Greenberg`s Universal no.28; exceptions; demonstrative pronouns in Bulgarian, relative pronouns in Bulgarian, Slovenian, Slovak, Czech, Old Bulgarian (Abstract) The paper presents some exceptions of Greenberg`s Universal no.28, in which the derivation is not placed between the root and the inflection, but the inflection follows the root and precedes the derivation. Typical example is the Bulgarian demonstrative pronoun tak-a-va (Feminine form), tak-o-va (Neutral), tak-i-va (Plural), meaning `such kind of`, in which the derivation –va follows the inflections –o-, -a-, -i-. The same exceptions of the rule are the forms of relative pronouns in Bulgarian (e.g. koj-to MASC., koja-to FEM, koe-to NEUT, koi-to PL` which`) as well as the relative pronouns in Slovenian, Slovak, and Czech, where we can trace the origin of the construction to Old Bulgarian and Common Slavic. The complicated word-formation of pronouns in Bulgarian and some other Slavonic languages presents unique structures, which throw new light upon the morphological patterns in the World languages.

Citation preview

. . . : Summa cum pietate. Studia litterarum. . 2. , 2009, . 34-43. [Lilia Ilieva. Bulgarian Language and the Language Universals. A Paper].

BULGARIAN AND LANGUAGE UNIVERSALS

Key words: Greenberg`s Universal no.28; exceptions; demonstrative pronouns in Bulgarian, relative pronouns in Bulgarian, Slovenian, Slovak, Czech, Old Bulgarian

(Abstract)

The paper presents some exceptions of Greenberg`s Universal no.28, in which the derivation is not placed between the root and the inflection, but the inflection follows the root and precedes the derivation. Typical example is the Bulgarian demonstrative pronoun tak-a-va (Feminine form), tak-o-va (Neutral), tak-i-va (Plural), meaning `such kind of`, in which the derivation va follows the inflections o-, -a-, -i-. The same exceptions of the rule are the forms of relative pronouns in Bulgarian (e.g. koj-to MASC., koja-to FEM, koe-to NEUT, koi-to PL` which`) as well as the relative pronouns in Slovenian, Slovak, and Czech, where we can trace the origin of the construction to Old Bulgarian and Common Slavic.

The complicated word-formation of pronouns in Bulgarian and some other Slavonic languages presents unique structures, which throw new light upon the morphological patterns in the World languages.

, . , , . , - , , ., , . , ( , , , , , . 1984, . 75-76; ). , , , . , 28 . ( 1963/1966/, 1970 ( , . 161). : , . . . , ( 1994 (2007). . , , , , . Kinderchen ``, Kind- ``, r ( ) chen ( 1994, . 2556). chen e er. , 28 . . 1. . ( ) : ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( , ). , , , (-- , -- , -- ). . ( , . 147, . ( , . 114) - , ). ) , - (, . 175). - , . : :

: - - , , : (. .), * (..),* (..), * ( ). , , , . - , , ( . , ``, . 1963, . 138). :: (..), (..), (.), (.., ..), (....), (.., . .)

(..), (..), (..), (.., ..), (....),

(.., ..)( 2001, .140, .143) ( , ) , . ( , , `` , ( ) .1.1. , , , ( , , , , ), . .1.2. , , , . , -- ( ..), - (. .), - (..). , . - , , , . ,. : , ( , ). , ( ) (. .), (. . ), (...). : , , , . . . , : ? .1.3. , , , . 70- . . . ( , , ), . , , . . , , . . , , . --- --- ( ) ( ) , - )) . .

1.4. , , , ( , ), ( ), ( ). -/ -, ( ). . ( 1971). - , .. , . , . , ( ., - - ), . , , , , .. . , /, / , /. , , , - : . , , , , . , , , , . .-2 . , : - -, -, -, - ; -/-, -/-, -, -// - `-, -, -, - ; -, -, -, -. (`/, -, -/) , . 28 . . , . . ( . 172). V . , , , : . , _( . , - ). , : - (-); -. , .: ( ) ( - ) = ( - ), - ( ); ( ) - = . , , , , . ``:- (.), - (..), - (..), - (. . . ..), - (.. . .). , -, - - ( ). (, - , , .. . .. .. , . .. .. .. .. ( -), . , , / . , ( ), ,/ , . . , , :

j (..), (..), (..), (.. . .), ( .. . .), (.. . .).3. . ( , ) , , . :

:

+

+ + + , ( -, -, -, -) . . , : + ( ),

+ ( )

+ ( )

, - . : : *j + > *j + > *j- + > , , , , .. . , ; , . , ( , ) , . - ( ), ( ), ( ) (, . 116). , (.. , , , . -, -, / , , . . . , , , `, , , ` (. .), , . , , , . () - , . , , , , -. , - , . , , *e, . , , , . . e > r , (, . 281). kdor (< kdo + r) , : kdor ( ), kogar ( ), komur (), kogar (), komer (), komer (). , . , , -, ( -, ), , , . , . - - . , . - , , . , ( ), . ( , ), , . , :

1. . , , , .2. , , , , . , .

3. . , * , . 28 . , , - . 1963: . . . , , 1963 , .1971: . , 20, 1971

1963/1966 (1970): . . , (. .). . .5. . , 1970). 1986: . . . . , 1986 1986: . . . , 1986 1994: A. Castrairs McCarthy. Morphological universals . In: R. E. Asher (ed. in-chief). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford etc, 1994 1984: . . . , 1984 2001: . . - (, , ). , 2001 1994 (2007): . , . (. ). , 2007 1999 . . - . , . . . . , 1999 , . . , , ( , ), .